Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
College of Engineering
Manila
Experiment no. 3
SOLUBILITY DIAGRAM OF A
Section: 51018
The purpose of this experiment is to determine the solubility diagram for a system that is made up
of two partially miscible liquid components A and B which is phenol and water. This solubility diagram is
an equilibrium composition of solution as a function of temperature and pressure. In the experiment, 80%
phenol solution was prepared. Using a burette, distilled water was added to the phenol solution. The tube
was placed in the water bath and the water in the hot bath was heated with continuous stirring using the
copper stirrer until a clear solution formed. After that, the solution was subjected to air bath with
continuous stirring until the solution became cloudy. The clouding and clearing temperatures were
recorded. The results showed that the increase in water content of the solution decreases the %wt phenol.
The different volume ratios of mixtures prepared were subjected to constant heating and cooling in order
to gather the needed temperature necessary for the construction of the solubility curve of Phenol-Water
solution.
INTRODUCTION:
𝑃𝑎 = 𝑃𝑎∗ . 𝑋𝑎
Where:
𝑃𝑎 - Vapour pressure of pure substance A
𝑃𝑎∗ - Partial vapour pressure of substance A in solution
𝑋𝑎 - Molar fraction of substance A
The components of a binary system no longer continuously mix, but instead have the
tendency to again unmixed. A miscibility gap can be observed. This is a range of concentrations
in which the two liquids form two phases. The molar mixing enthalpy is positive. Unmixing
means in this case the transition to a lower energy condition.
Systems with limited miscibility can be presented as isobars in temperature/ mass content
and temperature/ quantity diagrams. In these separation curves, the compositions of the two
coexisting liquid phases, which form from the homogeneous mixture when a certain temperature
has been reached, are plotted as functions of temperature. The coexisting liquid phases are
described as conjugated solutions. They are saturated solutions of the one component in the
other. The line connecting the coexisting liquids is designated as the tie line. Normally the
mutual solubility of liquid components increases with increasing temperature. The coexisting
solutions are identical at a critical dissolving temperature. Above the critical dissolving
temperature the components are miscible with one another in any ratio. The compositions of the
coexisting solutions at certain temperature are constant and independent of the mass ratios or the
two components.
Solubility and phase diagrams for complex mixtures of soluble and membrane proteins
are being examined in recent studies (Talreja, 2010). Solubility diagrams have many applications
and uses. Analysis of solubility diagrams are made on some important pharmaceutical drugs like
diazepam and nitrazepam (Hadziabdic, 2012). Solubility and phase diagrams for fatty acids are
also being examined in some researches (Tzocheva, 2011).
Heats of mixing of polymers with each other have been measured, the behavior of the
mixtures of solutions of various polymers has been studied, and the dependence of mechanical
properties of polymer mixtures on the ratio of components has been investigated. It has been
shown that mixing of polymers with each other is usually an endothermic process and, therefore,
leads to formation of macroscopically homogenous, but actually microheterogenous, systems
with an extremely high degree of dispersion. These microheterogenous polymer mixtures are
formed because of the enormous viscosity of polymer mixtures, which prevents macroscopic
separation into phases but does not hinder the considerable mobility of the segments of flexible
chain molecules. (Slonimski, 1998)
The terms, miscibility and solubility, are widely used in phase behavior studies of
multicomponent hydrocarbon systems. The distinction between these two terms appears to be
still hazy, leading to their synonymous use in some quarters. (Ayiralam and Rao, 2006)
The phenol-water system is the mixture used in this experiment. Other studies examine
phase and solubility of other systems. For example, in a certain study the liquid-liquid equibria
of the water-acetic acid-butyl acetate system was investigated. (Ince, 2002). Studies are also
made about the equilibria of mixtures involving water -phenol and another third component like
carbon dioxide. (Yoon, 2004)
The study of phenol-water system has many industrial applications. It can be applied to
cases that involve extraction of phenol from industrial water (Jabrou, 2012). It can also be
applied to phenol removal from water in some recent study (Zhang, 2013). Another research
probed the degradation of phenol in water solution by photo catalysis (Laoufi, 2008). A recent
study quantified phenol in surface water by gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy.
(Hossain, 2009)
METHODOLOGY:
Eighty percent of phenol solution was prepared. This was done by using graduated
cylinder. About twenty ml of melted phenol was put in the graduated cylinder and distilled water
was added which was equivalent to one-fourth the weight of the phenol using burette.
The weight of the phenol was recorded. The phenol was transferred to the 50-ml test tube
that is covered with a cork fitted with a thermometer and a copper wire stirrer. Using acid
burette, distilled water was added to phenol solution. Stirred continuously until the solution
turned cloudy. The volume of the phenol solution was recorded.
The test tube was placed in a water bath and stirred until a clear solution was formed. The
temperature of the clear solution was recorded. The tube was removed from water bath and
continuously stirred the solution until the solution turned cloudy. The clouding temperature was
recorded. An additional 1-ml of distilled water was added from the burette and the previous step
was repeated. This was done nine times.
Finally, all the data was recorded in the table. The % weight of pure phenol in all solution
was computed and the density of the eighty percent of phenol solution used is 1.05 g/mL. The
data of the temperature versus the percent weight of phenol was graphed.
RESULTS:
Run No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Clearing
70 67 66 64 62 61 60 58 58 56
temperature
(oC)
Clouding
59 60 60 59 59 57 50 53 50 51
temperature
(oC)
Average
64.5 63.5 63 61.5 60.5 59 55 55.5 54 53.5
temperature
(oC)
Volume of
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
phenol
solution
Weight of
10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5
the phenol
solution
(W1)
Weight of
8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4
pure phenol
Weight of
water added
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
to phenol
(W2)
Total weight
9.4 10.4 11.4 12.4 13.4 14.4 15.4 16.4 17.4 19.4
of solution
(WT)
Weight %
89.36 80.77 73.68 67.74 62.69 58.33 54.55 51.22 48.28 43.30
phenol
GRAPH:
Solubility Curve
70
60
50
Temperature
40
30
20
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
%Weight of Phenol
DISCUSSION:
Phenol and water are partially miscible at normal temperatures though the solubility of
both liquids increases with the increasing temperature until the critical solution temperature is
attained and the liquids become completely miscible above this point. Water becomes more
soluble in phenol. In this experiment mixtures of known composition are heated until they
dissolve completely. This is easily recognized by the disappearance of cloudiness due to two
phases.
On the water added to phenol the results showed that as the number of runs increases, the
weight% of the phenol decreases. For the clearing temperature, as the runs increases, the
temperature decreases. On the other hand, in the clouding temperature, as the runs continue, the
temperature becomes unsteady.
If a small amount of water is added to a large quantity of liquid phenol, it gives a single
phase system, which means the solution of water in phenol. When water and liquid phenol are
mixed in ‘comparable’ proportion, a two phase system results in one phase. The solubility of
partially miscible liquids rises with temperature. In this case, the solubility curve exhibits a
maximum temperature of 70°C. The critical solution temperature didn’t attained because as the
%weight of phenol decreases as the temperature decreases.
The possible sources of error are personal errors. Personal errors may appear from the
fault of determining the correct temperature and fault in giving an accurate volume reading.
From the water added to phenol, as the volume of water increases, the weight percent of
phenol decreases. Partially miscible liquids become more soluble in each other with increasing
temperature but the critical solution temperature didn’t reached. As the %weight of phenol
decreases, the temperature decreases.
The researchers recommend avoiding any solution of phenol. Also avoid spilling and
clean up immediately with large amounts of water, and to never pipette by mouth.
APPENDIX:
Sample computations:
59 + 70
𝐴𝑣𝑒. 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 = = 64.5℃
2
𝑔
𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑙 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 1.05 ∗ 10𝑚𝑙 = 10.5𝑔
𝑚𝑙
𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑙
𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡% 𝑜𝑓 𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑙 = 𝑥100%
𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
8.4
𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑙 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 𝑥100% = 89.36%
9.4
REFERENCES:
Ayiralam, Subhash C. and Dandina N. Rao. “Solubility, miscibility and their relation to
interfacial tension in ternary liquid systems.” Fluid Phase Equilibria 249.1 (2006): 82-91.
Hadziabdic J., Elezovic A., Rahic O., 2012. Indira MujezinEffect of Cyclodextrin Complexation
on the Aqueous Solubility of Diazepam and Nitrazepam: Phase-Solubility Analysis,
Thermodynamic Properties. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2012, Vol 3, pp 811-819
Hales, B. J.; Bertrand, G. L.; Hepler, L. G. Effects of third components on critical mixing in
the water-triethylamine system. Journal of Physical Chemistry 1966, 70(12), 3970-3975.
Kondepudi, D.; Prigogine, I. Modern Thermodynamics: From heat Engines to Dissipative
Structures; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, England; 1999. Critical phenomena in binary
solutions are discussed in Section 13.2.
Laoufi N.A., Tassalit D., Bentahar F., 2008. The Degradation of Phenol in Water Solution by
TiO2 photocatalysis in a Helical Reactor. Global Nest Journal, 2008, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp 404-418
Talreja S., Perry S.L., Guha S., Bhamidi V., Zukoski C.F., Kenis P.J.A., 2010. Determination of
the Phase Diagram for Soluble and Membrane Proteins. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2010,
114 (13), pp 4432–4441
Tsocheva S.S., Kralchevsky P.A. , Danov K., Georgieva G.S., Post A.J., Ananthapadmanabhan
K.P., 2011. Solubility limits and phase diagrams for fatty acids in anionic (SLES) and zwitterion
(CAPB) micellar surfactant solutions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2011, Vol. 369,
pp 274-286
Yoon J.H., Lee H., 2004. Clathrate phase equilibria for the water–phenol–carbon dioxide system.
AIChE Journal. Vol. 43, Issue 7, pp 1884–1893
Zhang J., 2013. Phenol Removal from Water with Potassium Permanganate Modified Granular
Activated Carbon. Journal of Environmental Protection, 2013, Vol. 4, pp 411-417