Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CHAPTER 1:
NATURE AND INQUIRY OF RESEARCH
2. Research provides answer to a question. People have always been left with myriad of questions about anything
else in the environment. For example, a child may ask questions such as why the sun comes up, how birds lay
eggs, why people eat, and a lot more. At a higher level one may inquire about causes of climate change, nuclear
energy for water desalting, impact of online gaming to the youth, and others. This is where the science of
inquiry comes into play.
Contemporary researchers, however added certain criteria for defining a research problem. It should possess
newness or novelty, and international characters especially if the research output is intended for presentation
in international conference, if not, publication in international scientific journals.
2. Developing a research plan. Doing a research is like building a house. Researchers have to lay out a plan in such
a way it will surely guide them through and through. Some essentials of research plan include specific research
aim, background and significance, related readings, and research designs and methods to use.
3. Collecting research data. One of the important steps in scientific inquiry is data collection. Primary data can be
collected through observation, interview, survey, experimentation, document analysis, etc.
4. Analyzing research data. This step is carried out when all necessary data are intact and ready for analysis. An
inquiry that uses qualitative method usually requires a different method of analysis. A quantitative research,
however, requires a different technique which is statistical in nature.
5. Presenting the findings. Checking the accuracy and completeness of the research data is an essential task before
writing and revising the contents of the research paper; otherwise the presentation of data would appear
insufficient, and yes, even questionable.
6. Disseminating and utilizing the findings. Regardless of stature in conducting research, one should strive to
disseminate the research results which may be considered an excellent baseline information for another study.
Modern-day research scientists present their research findings in research conference; others publish them in
reputable journals. And this should be made the ultimate purpose of knowledge creation.
2. Obtaining Informed Consent. One of the foundations of research ethics is the idea of informed consent. Simply
put, informed consent means the participants should understand that they are taking part in research and what
the research requires them. Such information may include the purpose of research, the methods being used,
the possible outcomes of the research, as well, as associated demands, discomforts, inconvenience and risks
that the participants may face.
3. Protecting anonymity and confidentiality. Protecting the anonymity and confidentiality of research participants
is another practical component of research ethics. After all, participant will typically only be willing to volunteer,
especially information of a private or sensitive nature, if the researcher agrees to hold such information in
confidence.
4. Avoiding deceptive practices. At first sight, deceptive practices fly in the face of informed consent. After all, how
can participants know that they are taking part in research and what the research requires of them if they are
being deceived? This is part of what makes the use of deceptive practices controversial. For this reason, in most
circumstances, research should avoid any kinds of deceptive practices. However, this is not always the case.
Deception is sometimes a necessary component of covert research, which can be justified in some cases. Covert
research reflects research where the identity of the observer and/or the purpose of the research is not known
to participants. Cases where you may choose to engage in covert research may include instances where:
It is not feasible to let everyone in a particular research setting know what you are doing.
Overt observation or knowledge of the purpose of the research may alter the particular phenomenon
that is being studied.
Imagine some of the following scenarios where covert research may be considered justifiable:
Scenario A
You are conducting a piece of research looking at prejudice. While participants are given a questionnaire to
complete that measures their prejudice, it is not obvious from the questions that this is the case. Furthermore,
participants are not told that the research is about prejudice because it is felt that this could alter their
responses. After all, few people would be happy if other people thought they were prejudice. As a result, if
participants knew that this is the purpose of the study, they may well provide responses that they think will make
them appear less prejudice.
Scenario B
You are interested in understanding the organizational culture in a single firm. You feel that observation
would be an appropriate research method in such a naturalistic setting. However, you feel that if employees
knew that you were monitoring them, they may behave in a different way. Therefore, you may have received
permission to go undercover or provide a story to explain why you are there, which is not the truth.
The Republic Act No. 8485 or also known as the “Animal Welfare Act of 1998” establishes rules and
regulations for promoting animal welfare throughout the country. It is the purpose of this Act to protect and
promote the welfare of all animals in the Philippines by supervising and regulating the establishment and operations
of all facilities utilized for breeding, maintaining, keeping, treating or training of all animals either as objects of trade
or as household pets.
Section 8 of the act states that any person who violates any of the provisions of this Act shall, upon conviction by
final judgment, be punished by imprisonment of not less than six (6) months nor more than two (2) years or a fine of
not less than P1,000.00 nor more than P5,000.00 or both at the discretion of the Court. If the violation is committed
by a juridical person, the officer responsible therefor shall serve the imprisonment when imposed. If the violation
is committed by an alien, he or she shall be immediately deported after service of sentence without any further
proceedings.
E. SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT
Scientific dishonesty happens when a researcher deviates from the acceptable norms of conduct while
doing his or her study. These include:
Plagiarism – using other people's work without acknowledging their contribution.
Fabrication – making up results and recording or reporting them.
Falsification – manipulating research materials, equipment or process or changing or omitting data or
results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record.
REFERENCES:
Amorado, R. (2017). Qualitative Research: A Practical Approach. Mutya Publishing House, Inc. Malabon City
Fernandez, F. & Ramos, L. (2014). Handbook on Research Writing.
Mason, J. (2002).Qualitative Researching, 2nd Edition. Sage Publishing, Inc. London
Yin, R. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. The Guilford Press. New York