Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE FURTHER that, if you fail to appear and defend and
Page 1 of 10
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Jan 03 9:03 AM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2600014
fail to answer the Complaint as required by this Summons within thirty (30) days after the
service hereof, judgment by default will be rendered against you for the relief demanded
in the Complaint.
Page 2 of 10
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Jan 03 9:03 AM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2600014
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
) FOR THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
COUNTY OF HORRY )
its principal place of business, or its “nerve center” located in Myrtle Beach, Horry County,
Page 3 of 10
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Jan 03 9:03 AM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2600014
South Carolina and is the owner and operator of the Aquarius Motel, a short term, weekly
2. Plaintiff, MB MO, LLC, is a South Carolina limited liability company with its
principal place of business, or its “nerve center” located in Myrtle Beach, Horry County,
South Carolina and is the owner and operator of the Atlantic Motel North and the Atlantic
Motel South, both of which are short term, weekly rental motels located in Myrtle Beach,
South Carolina.
Carolina and is the owner and operator of the Sand Dollar Motel, San Marcus Villas and
the Ocean West Motel, each of which are short term, weekly rental motels located in
4. Plaintiff, Liberty & New Life, LLC, is a South Carolina limited liability
company with its principal place of business, or its “nerve center” located in Myrtle Beach,
Horry County, South Carolina and is the owner and operator of the White Sands Motel, a
short term, weekly rental motel located in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
existing pursuant to the laws of the State of South Carolina with its principal place of
business, or its “nerve center” located in Myrtle Beach, Horry County, South Carolina and
is the owner and operator of the Ocean Waves Motel, a short term, weekly rental motel
and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of South Carolina with its principal place of
business, or its “nerve center” located in Myrtle Beach, Horry County, South Carolina and
Page 4 of 10
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Jan 03 9:03 AM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2600014
is the owner and operator of The Boulevard Motel, a short term, weekly rental motel
company with its principal place of business, or its “nerve center” located in Myrtle Beach,
Horry County, South Carolina and is the owner and operator of The Virginian Motel which
is a short term, weekly rental motel located in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
company with its principal place of business, or its “nerve center” located in Myrtle Beach,
Horry County, South Carolina and is the owner and operator of Summer Winds Motel and
7 Brothers Motel, each of which are short term, weekly rental motels located in Myrtle
company with its principal place of business, or its “nerve center” located in Myrtle Beach,
Horry County, South Carolina and is the owner and operator of the Blake Motel which is
a short term weekly rental motel located in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
with its principal place of business, or its “nerve center” located in Myrtle Beach, Horry
County, South Carolina and is the owner and operator of the Fountainbleau Inn which is
a short term weekly rental motel located in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
11. Plaintiff, Academy Way, LLC, is a South Carolina limited liability company
with its principal place of business, or its “nerve center” located in Myrtle Beach, Horry
County, South Carolina and is the owner and operator of the Oasis Motel and Sea Nymph
Motel, each of which are short term weekly rental motels located in Myrtle Beach, South
Page 5 of 10
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Jan 03 9:03 AM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2600014
Carolina.
12. Plaintiff, IIG, LLC, is a South Carolina limited liability company with its
principal place of business, or its “nerve center” located in Myrtle Beach, Horry County,
South Carolina and is the owner and operator of the Sea Palms Motel which is a short
13. Plaintiff, Americana, LLC, is a South Carolina limited liability company with
its principal place of business, or its “nerve center” located in Myrtle Beach, Horry County,
South Carolina and is the owner and operator of the Americana Motel which is a short
14. Upon information and belief, Defendant Horry County is a body politic
organized and existing under the laws of the State of South Carolina and is authorized by
statute to sue and be sued in its own name, and pursuant to state law operates and
maintains its own law enforcement agency, the Horry County Sheriff’s Department, under
the supervision and direction of the duly elected Horry County Sheriff. Defendant Horry
County also, pursuant to state law, operates and maintains a Magistrate’s Court, under
15. Upon information and belief, Defendant City of Myrtle Beach is a body
politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of South Carolina and is
authorized by statute to sue and be sued in its own name, and pursuant to state law
operates and maintains its own law enforcement agency, the Myrtle Beach Police
Department, under the supervision and direction of the duly appointed Police Chief.
Defendant City of Myrtle Beach also, pursuant to state law, operates and maintains a
Municipal Court, under the supervision and direction of a duly appointed Chief Municipal
Page 6 of 10
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Jan 03 9:03 AM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2600014
Judge.
16. Venue is proper in Horry County as this is where the events complained of
herein occurred.
JURISDICTION
17. This matter is brought pursuant to Rule 57 of the South Carolina Rules of
Civil Procedure and pursuant to the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, South Carolina
18. Each of the Plaintiffs are short term, weekly rental motels in Myrtle Beach.
19. Any time the Plaintiffs have renters who fail to pay or otherwise violate the
rules and conditions of their stay, Plaintiffs call law enforcement to seek assistance with
the ejectment of the renters, as authorized by law, and the responding law enforcement
agency may be the Myrtle Beach Police Department or the Horry County Sheriff’s
Department.
20. For the past several months, despite the clear and unambiguous statutes
and laws, officers of both agencies have refused to remove the violators and non-
compliant renters and have informed Plaintiffs they must file “eviction” actions with the
21. Despite the clear and unambiguous statutes and laws, Plaintiffs have filed
the actions in local courts, under protest and objection because they are all innkeepers
as defined by South Carolina statute, only to be told by at least one judge of the
Defendants, that they are in fact “landlords” and subject to the South Carolina Residential
Landlord Tenant Act. This legal conclusion is simply wrong, false and flies in the face of
Page 7 of 10
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Jan 03 9:03 AM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2600014
the clear language of South Carolina statutes.
. . .
. . .”
23. It is undisputed each of Plaintiffs are required to, and do, pay accommodations
accommodations taxes, thereby recognizing them as hotels or motels, while at the same
time labeling them “landlords” when such classification suits them in Court, which is totally
25. South Carolina Code Ann. § 45-2-60 provides all the legal grounds upon
which any Innkeeper, including Plaintiffs, may eject a person including, but not limited to,
firearms, violation of laws, or violation of rules which have been posted in a conspicuous
place. These are the reasons for which Plaintiffs have sought to eject persons from their
inns and for which they sought assistance of Defendants’ law enforcement agencies.
26. The refusal of the Defendants’ law enforcement agencies to eject these
Page 8 of 10
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Jan 03 9:03 AM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2600014
people from Plaintiffs’ premises, and the Defendants’ local judicial officers’ legal rulings
and determinations that Plaintiffs are “landlords” subject to the Residential Landlord
Tenant Act have cost Plaintiffs substantial sums of money in free accommodations due
to the time taken to “evict” them when no such eviction is legally required, as well as filing
fees for eviction proceedings, time and expense of employees to handle these matters
and other direct and indirect costs and expenses and damages.
27. The refusal of the Defendants’ law enforcement agencies to eject these
people from Plaintiffs’ premises, and the Defendants’ local judicial officers’ legal rulings
and determinations that Plaintiffs are “landlords” subject to the Residential Landlord
Tenant Act is factually and legally unfounded, wrong, in blatant violation of Plaintiffs’
28. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference, as if fully set forth, each and every
29. Pursuant to South Carolina Code Ann. § 15-53-20, Plaintiffs hereby seek a
and a judicial declaration and confirmation they are not “landlords” and, in fact, are
specifically excluded by statute from the terms of the South Carolina Residential Landlord
Tenant Act, and as such their legal relationship with their guests is one of innkeeper/guest
“Innkeepers” as defined by statute, and declaring they are not “landlords” and, in fact, are
specifically excluded by statute from the terms of the South Carolina Residential Landlord
Page 9 of 10
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2020 Jan 03 9:03 AM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2020CP2600014
Tenant Act and declaring their legal relationship with their guests as innkeeper/guest and
not landlord/tenant.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray that this Court enter a declaratory judgment against
statute, and declaring they are not “Landlords” and declaring they are specifically
excluded by statute from the terms of the South Carolina Residential Landlord Tenant
Act, and declaring their legal relationship with their guests as innkeeper/guest and not
landlord/tenant, costs, attorney’s fees, and any other relief the Court may deem just and
proper.
Page 10 of 10