Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ISSN 0719-4250
http://jppres.com/jppres
Colombia.
*E-mail: juan.ramirez06@usc.edu.co
Abstract Resumen
Context: The work in the field, in the production of sugarcane Contexto: El trabajo en campo, en la producción de caña de azúcar
(Saccharum officinarum L.), makes it necessary to have quick and simple (Saccharum officinarum L.), hace necesario contar con métodos rápidos y
methods of detecting different compounds. sencillos de detección de diferentes compuestos.
Aims: To optimize the analysis of glucose and fructose in juice of Objetivos: Optimizar el análisis de glucosa y fructosa en jugo de caña de
sugarcane in field, we studied the possibility the use of Near-infrared azúcar en campo, estudiamos la posibilidad del uso de espectroscopía
spectroscopy (NIR) and their correlation with high-performance liquid de infrarrojo cercano (NIR) y su correlación con cromatografía líquida
chromatography (HPLC) (reference method) to reporting from the de alta eficacia (HPLC) (método de referencia) para informar desde el
laboratory reliable in short time data. laboratorio datos fiables en poco tiempo.
Methods: Sugarcane samples were collected in the field. The extraction of Métodos: Se recolectaron muestras de caña en campo. La extracción del
cane juice was done by macerating pieces of sugarcane. The jugo de caña se realizó mediante la maceración de trozos de caña de
determination of glucose and fructose was carried out by reference azúcar. La determinación de glucosa y fructosa se realizó por método
method HPLC and by NIR in the transmittance mode. Through primario y/o referencia HPLC y por NIR en el modo transmitancia. A
chemometrics and principal components analysis, the calibration model través de la quimiometría y el análisis de componentes principales, se
was developed. desarrolló el modelo de calibración.
Results: The statistical parameters of the regression method were Resultados: Se obtuvieron los parámetros estadísticos del método de
obtained as the coefficient of determination of 0.9717 and 0.9965, and regresión como: coeficiente de determinación de 0,9717 y 0,9965 y error
smallest calibration error of 0.0681 and 0.0229. The standard prediction estándar de calibración de 0,0681 y 0,0229. El modelo predictivo reportó
error was predicted between 0.136 and 0.08 for glucose and fructose, el error estándar de predicción de 0,136 y 0,08 para la glucosa y fructosa,
respectively, using the regression model. The above statistical variables respectivamente. Las variables estadísticas anteriores indicaron la alta
indicated the high correlation between HPLC and NIR. correlación entre HPLC y NIR.
Conclusions: These results allow to incorporate the NIR technique in the Conclusiones: Estos resultados permiten incorporar la técnica NIR en la
routine of analysis of samples, complementing the quality analysis of rutina de análisis de muestras, complementando el análisis de calidad
sugarcane juice (quality control field). de jugos de caña (control calidad campo).
Keywords: fructose; glucose; high-performance liquid chromatography; Palabras Clave: cromatografía líquida de alta eficacia; espectrofotometría
near-infrared spectroscopy. de infrarrojo cercano; fructosa; glucosa.
ARTICLE INFO
Received: February 2, 2018.
Received in revised form: July 5, 2018.
Accepted: July 9, 2018.
Available Online: July 27, 2018.
Declaration of interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding: The authors confirm that the project has not funding or grants.
_____________________________________
García Asprilla and Ramírez-Navas Reducing sugars determination by NIR
MATERIAL AND METHODS the wavelength range between 400 nm and 2500
nm (FOSS, 2012). In this way, they were processed
Location for the construction of the calibration model and
The samples were collected in the Mayagüez the correlation study between these two instru-
SA facilities, located in Candelaria, Valle del Cauca mental techniques, between 129 to 141 samples in
(3°24'00.5"N 76°19'37.2"W). The determination of the calibration phase and 66 samples in the predic-
inverted sugars (glucose-fructose) was carried out tion phase.
in the chromatography laboratory of CENICAÑA.
The reading in NIR was developed in the soil la- Determination of glucose and fructose by HPLC
boratory of Ingenio Mayagüez S.A. (IMSA).
The determination of glucose and fructose was
Sampling performed using an HPLC (WATERS, Breeze,
USA), with a binary pump system with flow 0.6
The sampling procedure in the field was carried mL/min, the autosampler with a temperature of
out according to internal manuals of the Quality 10°C, the heating chamber of the column at 90°C,
Management System of the organization. The the refractive index detector at 48°C. The separa-
samples analyzed in this study (129 to 141 in the tion column packed with sulfonated styrene-
calibration phase and 66 in the prediction phase),
divinylbenzene resin with Ca2+ exchanger was
were sampled in the period between January 2014 used (Column Sugar pack I). The mobile phase:
and March 2015. The population sample consid-
0.05 M EDTA solution (analytical reagent, Fisher
ered for this study is represented in the farms brand, USA). In the quantification, glucose stand-
planted with sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.), ards (analytical reagent, Fisher, USA), fructose
selected randomly and with a range of ages be- (analytical reagent, Merck, Germany) were used.
tween 8 to 14 months. For these ages under study, The juice samples were taken to a dilution of 2 mL
the concentration range of glucose and fructose in 50 mL, flask type A, completing the volume
ranges from 1.5 to 0.1% (each) (Meade, 1967; Chen with type I water. Subsequently, it was passed
et al., 1991; ICUMSA, 2007). In this group of sam- through a 0.22-micron filter and taken to the HPLC
ples, the representative varieties make up 80% of autosampler chamber, in the corresponding vial
the planted area in general, which are represented (Quattrocchi et al., 1992).
in CC 85-92, CC 93-4181, CC 93-4418, (CC, CENI-
CAÑA Colombia). Analysis by near-infrared spectrophotometry
In the field process, the extraction of sugarcane The analytical development was carried out us-
juice was carried out by macerating pieces of sug- ing the near infrared absorption spectrophotome-
arcane. The amount of juice extracted in each sam- ter (NIR, FOSS, XDS RLA model, Silver Spring,
ple ranged from 100 mL to 150 mL. Once the juice Maryland, USA), in a wavelength range from 400
was extracted, the plastic container was immedi- nm to 2500 nm, with a Si/SPb transmittance detec-
ately identified according to the consecutive inter- tor (Silicon-Lead Sulfide) (Skoog et al., 2000). For
nal, relating the place where the sample of sugar- the start of the reading in the NIR, the instrument
cane juice was taken. For the conservation in the was stabilized by turning on the instrument 45
field, portable coolers and gel coolant bags (UTEK, minutes before the readings and 10 minutes the
-23ºC, USA) were used. The samples were received tungsten filament lamp. The temperature of the
in the laboratory, where they were refrigerated samples at the time of the analysis was between 20
and/or frozen until analysis. Approximately 75 to 22°C. A 1 mm wide quartz cell was used to take
mL of juice sample was removed for the determi- the sample in NIR. The cell was previously
nation of glucose and fructose by the primary purged, the first time with distilled water and the
method and/or HPLC reference (ICUMSA, 2007). two subsequent times with the sample of analysis.
The remaining amount of the juice sample was an- Subsequently, 1 mL of sugarcane juice sample was
alyzed by NIR in the transmittance mode, and in
http://jppres.com/jppres J Pharm Pharmacogn Res (2018) 6(5): 394
García Asprilla and Ramírez-Navas Reducing sugars determination by NIR
transferred (with the help of the transfer pipette) tors (factors in this model is 6 and 9 for glucose
in the quartz cell. A 400 mL plastic beaker was and fructose, respectively), we sought to incorpo-
used to receive the waste. The readings of the NIR rate all relevant information, eliminating noise.
spectra were made according to the operating pro- The selection of the number of factors was carried
cedure of the ISIscan software (version 4.6.8, Foss out through cross-validation. In this method, the
Infrasoft International, USA). Each spectrum of group of samples is divided into segments. This
sugarcane juice was stored in the corresponding process leaves a sample outside each time and us-
software project. The results obtained for glucose es the rest of the samples to calculate the model,
(%) and fructose (%) by the HPLC reference meth- repeating the process until all the samples are ex-
od were recorded in the corresponding NIR spec- cluded and predicting the property to be deter-
trum. This set of spectra (samples) was then ex- mined (FOSS, 1998; Castillo, 2007) .
ported in the WinISIS program (version 4.6.8, Foss
Simultaneously, with cross-validation, the crite-
Infrasoft International, USA). The spectrum selec-
rion for selecting the number of factors with which
tion process was developed, the mathematical
the smallest calibration error (SCE) is calculated is
treatment of the group of spectra in the range of
used. The SCE is a statistical parameter that indi-
wavelength between 1100 nm and 2500 nm, as
cates the upper limit when a prediction occurs.
well as the statistical regression method of the cal-
When the calibration equation is applied to the
ibration model.
training set itself (calibration), the SCE is calculat-
ed from f-residuals as:
Statistical analysis (chemometry)
In the development of the calibration model,
(1)
the selection of samples was first taken into ac-
count by principal components analysis (PCA).
PCA information was restricted by the company Where N is the number of samples and number
(IMSA). The PCA only uses spectral information, K of wavelengths or factor.
allowing to condense the variability of the data
matrix into a smaller volume of information. Subsequently, its prediction was evaluated in a
Therefore, a more efficient calibration process is new group of samples, independent of the calibra-
achieved. Likewise, it allows to find the structure tion group, in the working concentration range of
of the data and identify logical groups and even the calibration model and of known composition,
"outlier" or unwanted samples. Then, the mathe- by means of the analysis by the reference method.
matical pre-treatment used is the second deriva- In this process, the prediction of the statistical
tive, which solves problems of band overlap and model has new comparison variables such as the
the displacement of baselines, this type of deriva- Standard Prediction Error (SPE), coefficient of de-
tive eliminates displacements that vary linearly termination (RSQ), which finally represent the var-
with the wavelength (FOSS, 1998, 2012; Cozzolino, iability of the calibration model developed for the
2002; Miller and Miller, 2002; Castillo, 2007). NIR prediction. The SPE is calculated from f-
residuals of the new set of samples as:
In the development and evaluation of the cali-
bration model, different parameters involved in
the calculation were taken as spectral interval, (2)
spectral pre-treatment, outliers, number of factors,
errors concerning the calibration. For this process,
the calibration model was developed by the modi- Once the calibration model was developed us-
fied partial least squares (MPLS) regression meth- ing: 1) principal components analysis, PCA, 2) the
od. This model has as its principle the reduction of model of mathematical pre-treatment of the spec-
the number of measured variables. In the devel- tra (samples): second derivative, 3) the regression
opment of this model, through the selection of fac- method for the equation: PLS and MPLS , and, 4)
scatter analysis: scatter: Detrend, with the samples pores, and they elute more rapidly. The chromato-
destined for this purpose (FOSS, 2012). The type of gram of the separated components is obtained by
correlation presented by the comparison of the refractometric differences of the eluent of the col-
spectral data concerning the comparison of the in- umn. The exact estimation of peak height for sugar
strumental techniques and the type of response of is obtained by an electronic integration system that
the constituents under study was observed. then relates it to that obtained by a standard
(Quattrocchi et al., 1992; ICUMSA, 2007; Herrera
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Zambrano, 2011; Skoog et al., 2014).
Table 1. Statistical results of the calibration model: glucose and fructose parameters.
Components N SD Est Min Est Max SEC RSQ SECV 1-VR
Glucose 141 0.4049 0.000 1.8162 0.0681 0.9717 0.0993 0.9428
Fructose 129 0.3862 0.000 1.7206 0.0229 0.9965 0.0424 0.9887
N: number of samples (spectra); Est Min- Est Max: concentration reading range; SD: standard deviation; SEC: standard calibration error;
RSQ: coefficient of determination; SECV: standard error of cross validation; 1-VR: coefficient of determination in the cross validation.
Complementing these results, the coefficient of of samples in this area represents 70%. Between
determination in the cross-validation (1-VR), indi- the concentration range of 0.5 to 1.8% where there
cates that the constitutive variation in the calibra- is a greater dispersion, and the sample population
tion samples is explained by the statistical model is 30% of the group of selected samples. Figs. 4 and
in 94 and 98% for glucose and fructose, respective- 5 also show this behavior. In the residual range,
ly. Therefore, gathering these parameters, it is pre- for concentrations from 0.0 to 0.4% the dispersion
sented that the statistical model developed is a is between + 0.1 to - 0.2, and ± 0.15 for glucose and
source of high reliability in the prediction of said fructose respectively. On the other hand, in the
constituents. residual range, for the concentrations from 0.5 to
1.83% the dispersion is between + 0.22 to + 0.44,
The results obtained in the present study are
and - 0.1 to -0.25 for the glucose and the fructose,
similar to those reported by Larrahondo et al.
respectively.
(2001) in sugarcane where acceptable results of the
correlation coefficients of R2 0.80 were presented,
in the analysis of sucrose, glucose, fructose, using
HPLC reference method and a FOSS NIRSystems
6500. Also, in the determination of Brix (%) and
Pol (%), apparent sucrose content, using refracto-
metric and polymetric reference methods respec-
tively, where the results were more conclusive,
presenting correlation coefficients between 0.98
and 0.99 and standard errors of 0.13 to 0.14%. In a
group of 128 samples in the Valle del Cauca region
(Colombia).
Zossi et al. (2010) report satisfactory results, us- Figure 2. Correlation between data obtained from high-performance
ing as reference method a digital polarimeter opti- liquid chromatography (HPLC) standard method (glucose LAB) and
data predicted from Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR) for glucose in
cal Activity, polar model 2001 and a FOSS NIR
sugarcane juice.
Systems 6500 in the quantification of Pol (%), the
content of apparent sucrose, with correlation coef-
ficient R2 of 0.99 and standard error of 0.25, in a
group of samples of 2 335 samples in the Tucumán
region (Argentina). Also reported in studies of
sugarcane (Clarke et al., 1992; Johnson, 2001; Mad-
sen et al., 2003).
Fig. 2 shows the correlation between reference
method and/or primary HPLC (glucose LAB) and
the NIR prediction for the glucose parameter in
sugarcane juice. Fig. 3 corresponds to the fructose
parameter. Figs. 4 and 5 show the residue analysis
of the glucose and fructose parameter, respective-
ly. Figure 3. Correlation between data obtained from high-performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC) standard method (fructose LAB) and
In Figs. 2 and 3 the distribution regarding dis- data predicted from Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR) for fructose in
persion of the entire group of selected samples is sugarcane juice.
Considering the origin of spectral information present in the glucose and fructose molecules (CH,
that has absorption in the infrared region, the HOH, OH, C = O), which have absorption in the
probability of NIR prediction is high in this type of near infrared region (Castillo, 2007).
samples given the organic character in the bonds
Quattrocchi OA, de Andrizzi SIA, Laba RF (1992) Skoog DA, West DM, Holler FJ, Crouch SR (2014)
Introducción a la HPLC: aplicación y práctica. Argentina: Fundamentos de Química Analítica. México: McGraw-
Artes Gráficas Farro. Hill Interamericana.
Ramírez-García S, Carranza-Castro PH, Gutiérrez-Salinas J, Skoog, D A, Holler FJ, Nieman TA (2000) Principios de
García-Ortiz L, Hernández-Rodríguez S (2012) Aplicación análisis instrumental (5 ed.). México: Editorial Mc Graw-
en medicina de la espectroscopia de infrarrojo cercano. Hill.
Med Interna Méx, 28(4): 366. Xie L, Ye X, Liu D, Ying Y (2009) Quantification of glucose,
Ramírez-Morales I, Rivero D, Fernández-Blanco E, Pazos A fructose and sucrose in bayberry juice by NIR and PLS.
(2016). Optimization of NIR calibration models for Food Chem 114(3): 1135-1140.
multiple processes in the sugar industry. Chemometr Zossi S, Ruiz RM, Sorol N, Sastre M (2010) Espectroscopia por
Intell Lab Syst 159: 45-57. infrarrojo cercano (NIRS): Su aplicación en análisis de
jugos de caña de azúcar. Rev Ind Agríc Tucumán 87(1): 1-
6.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION:
Concepts or ideas x
Design x
Literature search x x
Experimental studies x
Data acquisition x
Data analysis x x
Statistical analysis x
Manuscript preparation x x
Manuscript editing x x
Manuscript review x x
Citation Format: García Asprilla IS, Ramírez-Navas JS (2018) Near-infrared spectroscopy: a rapid alternative technique to reducing sugars
determination in juice of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). J Pharm Pharmacogn Res 6(5): 392–401.