Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 7

 MENU SIGN IN/REGISTER 

Conference Proceedings

HOME BROWSE MORE 

Home > AIP Conference Proceedings > Volume 2173, Issue 1 > 10.1063/1.5133926

 PREV NEXT 

Free

Published Online: 11 November 2019

Design and development of maximum


power point tracking (MPPT) for 100
watt solar panel base on buck boost
converter
AIP Conference Proceedings 2173, 020011 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5133926

Sukarno Budi Utomo1,2,a), Iwan Setiawan4, Berkah Fajar2,3, and S. H. Winoto2

View Affiliations

   

Topics 

ABSTRACT
 PDF
Photovoltaic systems produce energy that is not constant and is very
dependent on weather conditions. Factors that can affect the output
produced by solar panels always experience changes in the amount of
sunlight intensity and working temperature of solar panels. To optimize
the power of solar cells, Maximum Power Point (MPP) is usually used. This
research design presents the implementation of Perturb and Observe
algorithms for Maximum Power Point Tracker (MPPT) as a controller for
solar power generators. The synchronous buck boost DC-DC converter
circuit is used as a lowering voltage controller which is controlled using
the P & O algorithm. The maximum power point (MPP) is the point in the VI
curve or VP curve on the solar panel at which point the solar panel works
in maximum efficiency that can produce the most output power. In
designing the Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithm that is
used to find and make the working points of solar panels always in the
MPPT area, Perturb and Observe are needed to get the right optimization
results.

REFERENCES

1.
S. M. Zahra, M. Saad and S. M. Mohsen, “MPPT with inc. conductance
method using conventional interleaved boost converter”, Energy Procedia,
Vol. 42
42, 24–32, (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.11.002,
Google Scholar,
Scholar Crossref

2.
 PDF of PV system using fuzzy logic
G.Y. Ayvazyan “Maximum power operation
control”, Armenian Journal of Physics, Vol. 1, 155–159, (2008).
Google Scholar

3.
A. P. K. Pradeep, S. Thirumaliah and G. Haritha, “Comparison of MPPT
algorithm for DC-DC converter based PV system”, International Journal of
Advances Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation
Engineering, Vol. 1, Issue 1, 18–23, (2012). Google Scholar

4.
M. Rifa’i and P. AtnaIka, “Pemodelan dan analisis panel photovoltaik”,
Conference Informatic, Telecommunications Electrical Engineering. UGM
Yogyakarta, (2012). Google Scholar

5.
D. Surojo, “Desain dan simulasi MPPT sel surya menggunakan fuzzy logic
control untuk kontrol boost converter”, 7th Basic Science National Seminar
Proceeding, (2010). Google Scholar

6.
B. N. Alajmi, K. H. Ahmed, S. J. Finney, B. W. Williams, “Fuzzy-logic-control
approach of a modified hill-climbing method for maximum power point in
microgrid standalone photovoltaic system”, IEEE Trans. Power Electron, 26
26,
1022–1030, (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2010.2090903,
Google Scholar,
Scholar Crossref

 PDF
7
7.
M. Helmy Mukti, and H. Onny, Hadi, “Pemodelan fuzzy logic control untuk
pengendali PWM pada buck converter”, JNTETI, Vol. 5, No. 1 (2016).
Google Scholar

8.
H.N. Zainudin, S. Mekhilef., “Comparation study of maximum power point
tracker techniques for PV system.” In 14th International Middle East Power
Systems Conference, (Cairo, Egypt, 2010). Google Scholar

9.
S. Jaw-Kuen, W. Yu-Chen, and C. Bo-Chih, “A study on the fuzzy-logic-
based solar power MPPT algorithms using different fuzzy input variables,”
Algorithms, Vol. 8, 100–127, (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/a8020100,
Google Scholar,
Scholar Crossref

10.
Y. Feri and M. H. Suryo, “Rancang bangun buck-boost converter” (2010).
Google Scholar

11.
I. P. Ratna, W. Sapto and R. Muhamad, “Maximum power point tracking for
photovoltaic using incremental conductance method”, Energy Procedia,
Vol. 68
68, 22–30, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.228,
Google Scholar,
Scholar Crossref

12.  PDF
R. Roshan, Y. Yadav, S. Umashankar, Vijayakumar and D.P. Kothari,
“Modeling and simulation of incremental conductance MPPT algorithm
based solar photovoltaic system using CUK converter”, Energy Efficient
Technology for Sustainability, (2013). Google Scholar

13.
S. Qin, M. Wang, T. Chen, X. Yao, “Comparative analysis of incremental
conductance and perturb –and-observation methods to implement MPPT
in photovoltaic system”, Electrical and Control Engineering (2011).
Google Scholar

14.
T. S. T. Balamurugan and M. Manoharan, “Fuzzy controller design using
soft switching boost converter for MPPT in hybrid system.” International
Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering, Vol. 2, Issue 5, (2012).
Google Scholar

15.
N. Femia, G. Petrone, G. Spagnuolo, and M. Vitellio, “Optimization of
perturb and observe maximum power point tracking method”, IEEE Trans.
Power Electron, Vol. 20
20, 963–973, (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2005.850975, Google Scholar,
Scholar Crossref

16.
A. Trias, N. Betantya, H. Susatyo, Y. Azli, Hermawan, F. Mochammad, S.
Iwan, “Maximum power tracking of solar panel using modified incremental
 PDF
conductance method”, International Conference on Information
,
Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering, (2018). Google Scholar

Published by AIP Publishing.

Resources

AUTHOR

LIBRARIAN

ADVERTISER

General Information

ABOUT

CONTACT

HELP

PRIVACY POLICY

TERMS OF USE

FOLLOW AIP PUBLISHING:

  
 PDF
Website © 2019 AIP Publishing LLC.
Article copyright remains as
specified within the article.

 PDF

Вам также может понравиться