Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 7

-1-

• What is the correct methodology that should be used to assess


Steven G. Nornhold the return on investment on capital replacement of assets?
1321 Lawrence Road, Danville, CA 94506 • Is time-directed maintenance the most cost-effective approach to
Mobile Phone: +1 925 382 3482 maintaining network assets?....What are the alternatives?
e-mail – “steven.nornhold@irconsultants.us”
IRC's Solution and Services:
Pennsylvania State University, B.S. Honors Nuclear Engineering
Harvard School of Public Health/Harvard Medical School IRC's RCM Solution, "The Preventive Maintenance Optimizer",
Naval Nuclear Power School, Orlando, Florida contains system models, criticality matrix/questions, and asset
Naval Electronics Technician ‘A’ School, Great Lakes, Illinois models for various asset intensive industries. The criticality
matrix/questions in conjunction with the extensive library of asset
models enable clients to cost-effectively assess the criticality of
their assets throughout their asset base and subsequently make
Professional Expertise
prioritized asset management decisions (e.g. prioritize capital
replacement, preventive maintenance, and corrective maintenance
Sole-Proprietor of International Reliability Consultants (IRC)
decisions). IRC utilizes the "The Preventive Maintenance Optimizer"
(1994 – Present)
in conjunction with on-site consulting services to set-up RCM
Programs, Asset Management Programs and IT Implementations for
IRC has developed a global niche in optimizing preventive
their clients.
maintenance practices within asset intensive businesses (e.g.
electric, gas, water, energy, mining and telecom). IRC's RCM IRC, is currently providing a significant amount of Data
methodology has enabled our clients to cost-effectively assess and Cleansing/Data Creation Services on ongoing and/or post MAXIMO
assign criticality rankings (i.e. High, Medium, Low, Not-
and SAP implementations (e.g. Asset and Location Equipment
Critical) to their assets throughout their asset base. These asset
Hierarchy Build, Bills of Materials Cleanse/Creation, Preventive
criticality rankings enable businesses to: (1) drive their preventive
Maintenance Job Plans Cleanse/Creation, Legacy Work Order
maintenance activities where it is needed most, (2) prioritize their
History Cleanse/Data Mining, etc.). Provided below is some
corrective maintenance actions, and (3) make more informed capital
background information on IRC's Maintenance and Reliability
asset replacement decisions. Furthermore, IRC's methodology has
Products and Services, Preventive Maintenance Program
helped asset intensive businesses answer the following key
Implementation/Computerized Maintenance Management System
questions:
(CMMS) Configuration Experience, and Maintenance and Reliability
Data Cleansing/Creation Services.
• Should like assets have the same package and frequency of
preventive maintenance activities or should operational criticality IRC's consulting personnel have both deep skills in the development
drive the frequency and package of preventive maintenance
and implementation of preventive/predictive maintenance programs
activities?
and the configuration and implementation of CMMS Preventive
• What are the dominant modes and failures causes of our assets
Maintenance Modules. IRC's Preventive Maintenance
• What is the best work breakdown structure and process to
configuration/implementation experience dates back to 1994 when
identify asset failures within our business? (e.g. What are the
we first teamed with IBM Global Services and Andersen Consulting
failure modes, failures causes that should be used to classify
to deliver SAP and MAXIMO implementation services globally.
network asset failures? and - What are the roles of customer
care representatives, in-sourced and out-sourced tradesmen,
IRC has extensive experience with configuring the CMMS to enable
and operations in documenting asset failures?)
RCM Program Implementation (e.g. triggering on-condition
• Is there a correct preventive/corrective maintenance ratio for our
preventive maintenance tasks, interfacing with predictive
assets? maintenance technologies, tracking/trending "As-Found" and "As-
-2-
Left" data captured during PM Activities, tracking and trending MTBF • Analyzing and tracking project progress and costs,
data captured within Passport through the use of pre-
developed "Damage, Cause, Remedy Codes") • Developing communication plans to ensure all stakeholders
are aware of project objectives, scope of work, schedule, key
IRC has compiled an extensive library of "equipment maintenance milestones, resource requirements, and overall costs.
templates" that are applicable to all industry verticals. IRC's • Managing both internal and external resources (e.g. 20 to 50
equipment templates are used to: (1) develop and communicate resources).
standard preventive maintenance tasks and intervals for equipment
based upon common business drivers (e.g. equipment: criticality, He has extensive Engineering, Operations and Maintenance process
operating environment, repair history, etc.) and (2) standardize the experience acquired through working in multiple industry verticals
preventive maintenance practices implemented by CMMS' like SAP, (e.g. Oil & Gas, Petrochemicals, Electric Generation, Electric/Gas
Indus Passport, MAXIMO, etc. Transmission and Distribution, Mining and Manufacturing).

IRC has an extensive library of equipment "Damage, Cause, Through his proven Management skills and process ownership
Preventive Maintenance Task Codes" for typical manufacturing experience he has a sound knowledge and understanding of
equipment. IRC utilizes this reference library (resident in IRC's RCM Enterprise Solution Deployment and the value of Process Integration
Software Tool: "The Preventive Maintenance Optimizer") to advise and Change Management during the implementation of SAP,
clients on the right level in which to collect, document and analyze MAXIMO and Meridium.
equipment failures within their CMMS.
A Selection of Steven Nornhold’s Experience
SAP/MAXIMO Work Summary:
• Over 20 years of experience working on Maintenance, Reliability
In the past 20 years, Steven Nornhold has delivered several asset and IT Projects.
management and operational excellence projects working with large • Management of Project Teams for development, implementation,
IT Integrators such as Accenture LLP and IBM. Specifically he has deployment and delivery of ERP Solutions, SRCM and
supported these companies with the management and delivery of Maintenance related Programs including SAP, MAXIMO and
asset management projects covering Data Cleansing, Data Meridium and Asset Management Projects. Industry Clients
Migration/Conversion, Integrations and Deployment of ERP, EAM include: Chevron, ConocoPhillips, British Petroleum, Shell, BP,
and CMMS Systems (e.g. SAP, MAXIMO, Meridium). These projects Jemena Electricity and Gas, Tesoro and many more.
have included the implementation of Maintenance Best Practices, • Extensive Operations and Maintenance process experience
Process Re-engineering, Training and Change Management. In working on multiple Projects at Client Sites internationally.
most cases Steven has acted as a Project Manager during the
• Extensive EPC turnkey project experience and the Delivery of
deployment of SAP and/or MAXIMO and/or Meridium. His typical
Operations and Maintenance.
responsibilities include:
• Developed and optimized plant maintenance strategies, including
• Planning and coordinating project team activities to materials management (Supply Chain Applications).
implement SAP/MAXIMO/Meridium. • Developed implementation/deployment plans and integration
processes for SAP-PM and MAXIMO-PM, and SAP-Meridium,
• Determining client requirements and translating these MAXIMO-Meridium.
requirements into operational plans.
• Developed the specification for integration of SRCM with SAP-PM,
• Identifying resource requirements to meet project MAXIMO-PM.
requirements. • Establishment of IRC Business Units in North America, Europe,
• Managing both internal and external subcontractors during Australia and other Asia Pacific Countries.
different phases of the SAP/MAXIMO Implementations. • Project Management of SAP and/or MAXIMO and/or Meridium
Implementations.
-3-
General BHPBilliton Global (2012-2014)

Responsible for the set up of IRC business units, marketing and 1SAP Implementation and Deployment – BHPBilliton Global
Management of Deployment and Delivery Project Teams for
Enterprise Solution (e.g. SAP, MAXIMO, EMPAC/PASSPORT), and • Responsible and Accountable for the Project Management of
process improvement projects namely associated with the application Work Management Deliverables for Data Cleansing and
Reliability Engineering Services and SRCM at Energy and Process Conversion Compliance to 1SAP requirements
Businesses covering; Energy Pipelines, Refineries, Electric, Gas and • Manage and Direct Development and Creation of PM
Water Utilities, Mining, and other process Industries. Strategies, Plans, Task Lists, PRT’s, Component and BOM
Cleansing, etc. for 1SAP Data Load and Implementation
Provided on site Project Management of ERP/EAM and RCM • Provide Support to the Master Data Conversion Team for
Projects at Energy Pipelines, Refineries and Electric, Gas and Water • Provide support to the Change Management Team for the
Utilities and Mining client sites. delivery of 1SAP Training needs.

Project Management of Enterprise IT Projects (1998 – 2015) SAP Brisbane City Council (2011 - 2013)
and MAXIMO and Meridium Implementations:
Assets and Works Management Functional Stream Lead / Business
Jemena Electricity and Gas (Australia) (2014 – June, 2015) Transformation and ERP Implementation Development. Steven
Nornhold has led the Assets and Works Team through the following
1SAP Implementation and Deployment – Jemena Electricty and project phases:
Gas Networks in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia
• Asset Management Gap Analysis
• Review of RICEFW Inventories for SAP Plant Maintenance • ERP Functional Specification Development
for Jemena;’s Gas Netowks • ERP Software Selection b/w SAP, Oracle and Mincom
• Design of Functional Asset/Location Hierarchy for • Creation of High Level Design Blue Printing (Level 1 – 4)
Transmission and Distribution Gas Assets • Creation of RICEFW Inventories for SAP Plant Maintenance
• Identification of Compatible Units and their alignment with the • Creation of Business Case to support the Implementation of
Asset/Functional Location Hierarchy SAP at Brisbane City Council
• Identification of Preventive and Corrective Maintenance • Creation of the Business Transformation and SAP
Processes for Jemena’s Gas Networks Implementation Plan/Schedule
• Creation of Preventive Maintenance Data Structures for
Jemena’s Gas Assets (e.g. PM Strategies) Responsible for leading and managing the cleansing, enrichment and
• Design of Bills of Materials (BOMs) – Functional Logation creation of the following SAP Master Data Objects:
BOMS and Equipment BOMs for Compressors Stations and
Regulators • Asset Functional Location Hierarchy
• Design of Equipment Damage and Cause Codes • Task Lists
• Responsible for Data Cleansing, Enrichment and Creation of • Task Strategies
SAP Master Data: Assets/Functional Locations, Equipment, • Task Measuring Points
PM Strategies, and Bills of Materials
• Bills of Materials
• Asset Damage and Cause Codes
-4-
Chevron Downstream and Chevron Shipping (2006 - 2011) Chevron’s Project Development and Execution Process (CPDEP)
was used to manage both Chevron Downstream Implementation of
Project Manager, Data Management Lead, IT/RCM SME / Chevron MAXIMO/SAP/Meridium and Chevron Shipping’s MAXIMO
Global Refining EAM MAXIMO/Meridium/SAP/Ariba implementation: implementation project. The CPDEP process provides a 5-phase
This project involved several concurrent work streams applied over approach to definition and execution of a project:
multiple international sites. Steven Nornhold’s responsibilities
included the development of standards and practices as well as 1. Identify and Assess Opportunities
management, organization, and oversight of the Data Management 2. Generate and Select Alternatives
Work Streams. Work streams included equipment record Data 3. Develop Preferred Alternatives
Cleansing, RCM Analysis Activities, Business Process Mapping, 4. Execute
Defining the Functional Requirements for the MAXIMO, SAP, and 5. Operate and Evaluate
Meridium Solution, Hierarchy Build, creation of Preventive
Maintenance Job Plans and Task Lists, Master PM Templates, At each Phase, CPDEP provides a good definition of:
Failure Causes and Codes (root cause analysis), P&ID review and
validation, and BOM optimization. As this project spaned multiple • Decision Makers
refineries (domestic and international) these work streams had to be
standardized to meet Chevron’s Global EAM requirements as well as • Deliverables
MAXIMO and Meridium standards and yet be easily applicable to • Work Team
specific refinery needs. Identification of common areas and • Focus Items
resolution of disparate areas was a critical aspect of this project.
Change Management played a key part in the success these • Resources
workstreams as stakeholder input and local refinery cultures needed • Value
to be managed at eight (8) different refineries, yet one standard • Metrics
solution needed to be delivered.
• Role of Owner's Project Support Team
Project Manager/ MAXIMO Implementation / Chevron Marine
Transportation MAXIMO Implementation: Steven Nornhold’s Steven fully understands the CPDEP process, phase gates and the
responsibilities in the project included Business Process Mapping, deliverables that are required throughout CPDEP’s five phases (e.g.
Facilitating the creation of the RICEFW Inventory, development of an Decision Review Board (DRB) presentations, Decision Support
asset and location hierarchy structure for MAXIMO, cleansing of Packages, etc.)
legacy data, establishing standards for Master PM’s and Work
Orders, and developing a format for Main Engine and other critical Tesoro (2011 - 2012)
equipment turn-around tasks. No hierarchy was in place prior to this
project, so the development had to include a methodology for Project Manager and Materials Analyst / Tesoro Golden Eagle (San
creation of functional locations, identification of Sections and Francisco) Refinery (Downstream): I was brought in to evaluate the
Systems, and hierarchy build standards. These had the additional impact that Materials Management, specifically the condition and
requirement of being applicable fleet-wide as well as across different handling of Bills of Material, was having on asset reliability,
vessel types and configurations. As the Project Manager Steven downtime, production loss, and materials costs. I was able to identify
Nornhold’s role was to function as liaison in identifying the client’s key factors, including the unrestricted use of automated BOM
needs and working with IBM to provide that functionality in the building programs within SAP and lack of coordination with
MAXIMO program. Engineering and engineered product vendors. Established a
methodology for cleansing of BOM’s, including work order validation,
vendor queries, OEM update and validation, and SME reviews. Data
loads in to SAP included commonly used maintenance documents,
including seal drawings, shop drawings, and OEM exploded views.
-5-
• Developed SAP MM and Equipment BOM’s and data load to
Project Manager/ ConocoPhillips Rodeo (San Francisco) Refinery SAP
(Downstream): Project Manager for development and • Implement SAP Strategy PM’s for HEP Equipment and data
implementation of a Maintenance Strategy for application within SAP, load to SAP
including maintenance work orders, turn-around tasks, and • Develop PM Activities and Schedules and data load to SAP
maintenance routes for the refinery Hydrocracker Upgrade project.
Project included rotating and fixed equipment as well as electrical SAP Data Creation, Equipment Criticality, PM and RCM
transmission & distribution and controls & instrumentation. This ConocoPhillips Bayway Refinery:
project spanned much of the operational refinery, including the
unicracker, fractionation, sour water stripper, sulphur / amine plant, • Validation of stand alone Critical Instrument (CI) data base
sulphur recovery, and cogen / utilities. Work was performed during and criticality ranking
project construction and commissioning to allow the work orders and • Preparation of CI Data Base and loading into SPI (INTOOLS)
routes to be in place when the equipment went live. The primary • Equipment Registry and data load to SAP
data sources were the project deliverables provided by Fleur • Functional Locations/Equipment Hierarchy and data load to
Engineering, including O&M Manuals, P&ID’s, construction drawings, SAP
electrical one-lines, and direct contact with equipment manufacturers.
• Master Maintenance Templates and load to SAP
This data was applied using refinery standards and SME reviews.
• SAP PM Task Lists and Maintenance Plans and load to SAP
ConocoPhillips (2007 - 2008) • External PM documents and Link to SAP PM
• Implement SAP Strategy PM’s for I&E Equipment
Project Manager and RCM Analyst / ConocoPhillips Rodeo (San • Operations and PM routes and load to SAP
Francisco) Refinery: Project Manager for development and
implementation of maintenance work orders, turn-around tasks, and Bosch (2006 - 2007)
maintenance routes for the refinery Hydrocracker Upgrade project.
Project included rotating and fixed equipment as well as electrical SAP PM Implementation Project Manager and RCM Analyst / B/S/H
transmission & distribution and controls & instrumentation. This (Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH) SAP implementation:
project spanned much of the operational refinery, including the Steven Nornhold’s primary responsibility on this project was to
unicracker, fractionation, sour water stripper, sulphur / amine plant, develop and oversee the implementation of the Maintenance Module
sulphur recovery, and cogen / utilities. Work was performed during of SAP PM across 4 U.S. manufacturing plants. As the first
project construction and commissioning to allow the work orders and implementation in North America, configuration had to meet local
routes to be in place when the equipment went live. The primary requirements as well as the protocols established by IT Global in
data sources were the project deliverables provided by Fluor Germany. Required steps were identified as the development of an
Engineering, including O&M Manuals, P&ID’s, construction drawings, SAP Functional Location and Equipment ID hierarchy, development
electrical one-lines, and direct contact with equipment manufacturers. of Maintenance Templates to standardize practises across multiple
This data was applied using refinery standards and SME reviews. sites, and the integration of Predictive Maintenance practices.
Maintenance Tasks (including task frequencies, durations, and
SAP Data Creation, Equipment Criticality, PM/RCM, BOM required materials) were created utilizing a physical inspection of
ConocoPhillips Rodeo HEP Project: each piece of equipment, a review of legacy information, and an
evaluation of the equipment manufacturers’ recommendations.
• Equipment/RCM Templates and data load to SAP Results were fine-tuned in a review process with appropriate
• PM Task Lists and Maintenance Plans and data load to SAP maintenance and engineering personnel. BOM’s were created for
each asset to address standard consumables as well as required
• Maintenance documents and Task Instructions and Link to
spares. Failure and Cause Codes and Key Performance Indicators
SAP PM
(KPI’s) were identified. IRC was responsible for configuration of the
-6-
SAP Maintenance Module and data loading. Detailed PM’s were created, identifying key equipment and indicating all steps required
created, identifying key equipment and indicating all steps required for completion of the task, allowing for cross-training of maintenance
for completion of the task, allowing for cross-training of maintenance personnel or the addition of new technicians. Process Safety
personnel or the addition of new technicians. Process Safety Management practices were developed, including energy isolation
Management practices were developed, including energy isolation and lock-out / tag-out procedures.
and lock-out / tag-out procedures.
Genentech (2002 – 2003) and Bayer (Berkeley, CA) – 2002
DMS Pharmaceuticals - Greenville, NC (2006 – 2007)
Project Lead – Completed Master Data Maturity Assessments at
Project Manager/RCM Analyst - Responsible for the Criticality Genentech and Bayer. These studies encompassed the evaluation
Analysis of Assets to identify where maintenance resources should of the Master Data within MAXIMO. In specific, the Master Data that
be focused to preserve the integrity of the production process and was reviewed included:
address health, safety, and environmental concerns. of equipment by
criticality. The Assets analyzed were within the HVAC Systems used • Assets/Functional Locations
for the clean room environments. This included the systems • Preventive Maintenance Task Lists and Job Plans
protection and control for these systems. The recommended • Bills of Materials
Preventive Maintenance recommendations were implemented via • Equipment Problem, Cause, Remedy Codes
MAXIMO. In addition, Problem, Causes, Remedy Codes created • Spare Parts
during the RCM analysis were utilized within MAXIMO for HVAC • Open Work Orders
Assets. • Open Purchase Orders
Bosch (2006 - 2007) The inputs of the Master Data Maturity Assessment included:
SAP PM Implementation Project Manager and RCM Analyst / B/S/H • Interviews with personnel responsible for Asset Master Data
(Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH) SAP implementation: (e.g. Asset Management Organization, Finance
Steven Nornhold’s primary responsibility on this project was to Organization, Procurement, Supply Chain, etc.)
develop and oversee the implementation of the Maintenance Module • Current computerized maintenance management systems’ -
of SAP PM across 4 U.S. manufacturing plants. As the first functionality and capability
implementation in North America, configuration had to meet local • Typical Data Sources (e.g. Finance, Procurement, HR, Asset
requirements as well as the protocols established by IT Global in Management, etc.)
Germany. Required steps were identified as the development of an • Reliability software systems’ - functionality and capability
SAP Functional Location and Equipment ID hierarchy, development • Current data collection techniques, tools, and processes
of Maintenance Templates to standardize practises across multiple • Current Asset Base
sites, and the integration of Predictive Maintenance practices. • Failure history of systems and discrete assets
Maintenance Tasks (including task frequencies, durations, and • Current maintenance strategy (time-directed, mixture of time
required materials) were created utilizing a physical inspection of and condition, risk based, well documented, etc.)
each piece of equipment, a review of legacy information, and an • Current Bills of Materials (BOMs) for Assets
evaluation of the equipment manufacturers’ recommendations. • Current PM Job Plans for Assets
Results were fine-tuned in a review process with appropriate • Current Work Break Down Structure for documenting Asset
maintenance and engineering personnel. BOM’s were created for Failures
each asset to address standard consumables as well as required • Work Order History (e.g. open/closed work orders)
spares. Failure and Cause Codes and Key Performance Indicators • Purchase Order History (e.g. open/closed purchase requests
(KPI’s) were identified. IRC was responsible for configuration of the and purchase orders)
SAP Maintenance Module and data loading. Detailed PM’s were
-7-
• Ownership of Asset Master Data (e.g. add/change/delete
governance) Accenture, USA/International (September 1998 – 2002)
• Organizational ownership of Asset Master Data (e.g. Assets Associate Partner / Technical Maintenance Expert
and Functional Locations, BOMs, PM Job Plans, Asset
Failure Codes) Steven Nornhold was an Associate Partner within the Resources
Market Unit of Accenture (previously Andersen Consulting). The
Steven Nornhold was responsible for: Resources Market unit encompassed Utility, Energy, Chemical,
Mining & Metals, and Forestry Products clients. Within this Market
• Creating data requests Unit, Mr. Nornhold had a global responsibility for:
• Creating interview questionnaires
• Compiling and organizing data - the ongoing development, delivery, and implementation
• Conducting personnel interviews capability for Accenture’s application of System Based Reliability
• Benchmarking current state of Asset Data against “Value Centered Maintenance (SRCM).
Realization Opportunities”
• Preparing final report with observations and - the products and services associated with Asset Management
recommendations Strategies.

Weyerhaeuser (2003 - 2006) - The integration of RCM methods and practices within SAP and
MAXIMO Implementations at Resource Clients (e.g. Utilities,
Project Manager/RCM Analyst/SAP Data Lead/ Weyerhaeuser Energy, Mining and Metals, Paper and Pulp and Chemicals
(multiple sites): These projects consisted of IRC identifying and Clients)
implementing three primary work streams across multiple sites in the
U.S. The first work stream was a Criticality Analysis to identify where - the launch and ongoing support of an Alliance with a leading
maintenance assets should be focused to preserve the integrity of Enterprise Energy Management Vendor: Silicon Energy. This
the production process and address health, safety, and also encompassed the implementation of Silicon Energy’s IT
environmental concerns. Raw data was gathered from system software solution at Accenture Clients throughout North
operators and maintenance personnel through an interview process. America.
This information was then quantified so as to indicate impact on the
areas of concern, yielding an accurate ranking of equipment by As an integral part of Mr. Nornhold’s arrangement with Accenture, he
criticality. The second work stream was the RCM analysis to joined Accenture as an Associate Partner and provided a license of
optimize the PM system, based on the determined criticality of the International Reliability Consultants’ System-based Reliability
equipment. On sites where the Maintenance Module of SAP was Centered Maintenance methodology and software tools to Accenture.
already in use this included data cleansing. If it was not in use then Mr., Nornhold still owns all intellectual created by International
SAP configuration was required (specified by IRC, configured by Reliability Consultants.
Weyerhaeuser). Existing equipment was evaluated using physical
inspection, manufacturer’s requirements, and legacy data. When a
new product line was being added to the New Bern, NC pulp mill
(winding stand, jumbo transfer, unwind / rewind, and wrap line) I
created the PM program utilizing the manufacturers fabrication
drawings, P&ID’s, and site visits, enabling the PM’s to be in place
when the equipment went on line. Critical spares were also identified
and developed into BOM’s. The third work stream was the creation
of Maintenance Templates to standardize maintenance practices for
similar equipment throughout a mill site and across multiple sites.

Вам также может понравиться