Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
PROTECTOR PROTECTOR
5
1,2 year 70
1 month
In 1995, an extensive research programme on the energetic transfer phenomenon that occurs
within a transformer during a short-circuit was implemented by SERGI. The mechanism of oil
4 days
10 hours
1 hour
Pressure Relief Valve comparison [4] 4 Pressure limit
Without protection
With a 6" Pressure Relief Valve
With a 6" TP
60
50
decomposition under thermal effects was analysed and resulted in the development of a 6 mn
Pressure in psi
Pressure in bar
36 s 3
Magneto-Thermo-Hydrodynamic model (MTH) [1]. 3,6 s The TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR and Pressure Relief Valve behaviours 40
0,036 s
0,0036 s
have been simulated under the same short-circuit conditions in order to 30
2
Accurate calculations were performed on transformers whose operational characteristics were 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
compare their performances. In each simulated case:
20
previously measured experimentally. SERGI therefore successfully validated the MTH model Temperature in C
• the TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR surpassed the Pressure Relief Valve 1
calculation in collaboration with a transformer manufacturer [2]. Time for mineral oil to generate:
and prevented the transformer tank explosion; 10
• one litre of gas versus temperature, °C.
• one gallon of gas versus temperature, °F. • the Pressure Relief Valve never avoided transformer tank explosion. 0 0
200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280
Time in ms
Power Plant transformers [3] Evolution of pressure with different protection systems for
Due to the generator inertia, power plant transformers suffer harsher fault conditions than
TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR tests [5] a small 60 bar/second (870 psi/s) pressure gradient
transmission and distribution transformers. Therefore, SERGI decided to investigate the explosion A total of 28 tests have been performed at the Electricité de France High Voltage Laboratory with the TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR to
of a power plant step-up transformer to design a system capable of preventing any kind of demonstrate the successful operation of the system and to prove its efficiency. Short-circuit conditions were simulated in a transformer tank
incident on any kind of transformer. full of dielectric oil. Electrical arcs were ignited with currents from 2 500 to 7 500 amperes and the arc energies were as high as 300 kilojoules.
During this investigation, SERGI discovered that electrical arcs inside transformer oil could The arcs were ignited by a fuse between two electrodes, creating short-circuits within the oil tank. These conditions were chosen to provoke
produce pressure gradients from 300 up to 930 bar/second (4 000 to 13 500 psi/s) and developed pressure gradients up to 930 bar/second (13 500 psi/s) calculated for power plants, when the generator inertia carries on feeding the short-
Computerised transformer design using a technique able to relieve internal overpressure before tank explosion. circuit [3]. During the 28 tests, pressure gradients ranging from 200 to 1 200 bar/second (2 900 to 17 400 psi/s) were measured.
the MTH model
The pressure gradients and tank depressurisation aspects encountered in the tests are in agreement
Pressure Relief Valve [4] with the values calculated using the MTH model before. In some tests, a combination of a
TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR and a Pressure Relief Valve was used to determine the difference in
For more than 30 years, Pressure Relief Valves have been used to protect Diaphragm
opening times of both devices. Every test confirmed that the TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR always
transformer tanks. However, all transformers that explode are equipped with activates before the Pressure Relief Valve. Buchholz measurements were taken to verify the
this device. The incapability of Pressure Relief Valves to release the pressure in behaviour of normal transformer instrumentation during strong short-circuit conditions. It was found
these cases led SERGI to conduct their dynamic mechanical study. In fact, such Oil that the Buchholz pressure signal always occurred 20 ms after the TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR had
calculation could not be conducted until the pressure gradients during short- exhaust
activated. Also, the Buchholz was unable to detect any of the gases generated by the electrical arc
circuit conditions had not been determined, and SERGI discovered them [1], [3]. section
throughout its duration of 80 milliseconds.
14000
Pressure Relief Valve 1000
250
20 evacuation section
12000
18 versus opening 800
TP Section 12" 200
Time, millisecond 0 ms 2 ms 4 ms 6 ms Fully opened
Evacuation section (inch2)
16 TP Section 10"
Flow in litre / second
Evacuation section (mm2)
10000
14
TP Section 8"
600
TP Section 6" 150
8000 12 PRV section 6" Oil expulsion to the
10
6000
TRANSFORMER 400
100
Oil-Gases
8
4000 6 PROTECTOR and Pressure Separation Tank
200
2000
4 Relief Valve dynamic flow 50
Average velocity:
2
comparison under a 0.8 16.8 meters/s
0 0 0 0
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 bar (11.6 psi) pressure 0 1 2 3 4 (55.1 feet/s)
Diaphragm opening height (mm) step Time in milliseconds
Time, millisecond 10 ms 20 ms 30 ms 40 ms
SERGI determined the Pressure Relief Valve spring inertia and energy losses, depending on its geometry and pressure gradients. The evacuation
section area and flow rate were calculated for various cases using finite element analysis. This enabled the understanding and quantifying of
the Pressure Relief Valve hydraulic behaviour throughout depressurisation, while subjected to different pressure gradients. A series of tests was also performed with an obstruction made of Bakelite between the arc and the Depressurisation Set, covering a third of
the tank surface area. The purpose of these tests was to verify the theory of the pressure wave delay inside the tank, due to the core and
The TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR was subjected to the same complete study, including mechanical and hydraulic finite element analysis of the windings. The presence of this obstruction did not interfere at all with the proper behaviour of the TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR. The light
whole depressurisation process. These calculations determined the performances of the TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR Depressurisation Set, obstruction remained unaffected and the depressurisation efficiency was unaltered. This therefore confirms that pressure always
including its opening parameters, according to its geometry and physical material properties. equalises before tank rupture occurs, since transformers always explode at their weakest point.
4 5
TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR
1-2 Transformer and On Load Tap Changer
Description Depressurisation Sets
All Depressurisation Sets include a Rupture Disk to relieve overpressure
Principles and a Decompression Chamber to favour high-speed depressurisation.
The TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR is a concept that can be applied to all transformers from 0.1MVA [6]. It enables to: Their diameter is calculated individually for each transformer and On
• depressurise tanks within milliseconds; Load Tap Changer types. In addition, transformer tanks Depressurisation
• avoid contact between air (oxygen) and the evacuated explosive gases; Sets also include an Isolation Valve and an Expansion and Vibration
• separate gases from the oil; Absorber.
• channel the gases far from the transformer environment to a remote area where they can burn
safely, such as in an oil refinery;
• eliminate the generation of explosive gases by making use of nitrogen injection.
7 Conservator Shutter
The Conservator Shutter prevents the
The TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR is a passive mechanical system, which can only be activated conservator tank from draining as it
by the level of transformer tank internal pressure reached during short-circuits. automatically closes when an unusual oil
The TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR has therefore a very high reliability, as false activation is impossible. flow is detected. It avoids to oversize the
TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR MTP Type
Oil-Gases Separation Set.
Different designs can be applied to this concept, according to the transformer characteristics and grid location. protecting 2 transformer tanks.
8 Control Box
Located in the plant Control
Room, it ensures the logic of the
system. The Control Box is
TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR MTPA Type
connected to all transformer
protections and to the
TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR. A - Isolation Valve Flange
B - Isolation Valve
6 C - Absorber
8 D - Rupture Disk
7 2 E - Decompression Chamber
F - Shock Wave Protection
Shutter
3
3 - 4 Transformer and On Load Tap
Changer Explosive Gases Elimination Sets
They create a safe environment inside the transformer and
On Load Tap Changer oil capacities by injecting a
strong nitrogen flow, after depressurisation occurs.
The number of nitrogen injection points varies
according to the transformer size.
SERGI does not recommend to limit the amount of conventional mechanical As important mistakes are often made during site design,
6 CAUTION or electrical protection devices when the TRANSPORTER PROTECTOR is used. CAUTION important recommendations regarding civil works are supplied in document [9]. 7
OLTC & OBCB protection Logic Diagram
On Load Tap Changers and Oil Bushing Cable How the TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR works
Boxes Explosion and Fire Prevention Explosion Prevention
Depressurisation Set
Activation
Instantaneous
Depressurisation
Logic Diagram
In addition to the tank, SERGI strongly recommends to protect the On Load Tap Changers and the Oil Bushings Cable Boxes with As soon as a critical level of pressure is reached inside a transformer oil capacity Signal
the TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR. For that purpose, a Depressurisation Set and a specific Explosive Gas Elimination Set are used. Explosive Gases
protected by the TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR, the Depressurisation Set is AND
Elimination
Protecting all transformer oil capacities prevents the short-circuit from damaging the On Load Tap Changer or the Oil Bushing Cable Box, and automatically and mechanically activated, which enables an instantaneous Buchholz
spreading the fire to the transformer itself as well as to the whole power plant or substation. The TRANSFORMER PROTECTOR therefore offers depressurisation. When activated, a signal is sent to the Control Box, which, in Differential o
complete protection of the transformer for a minor additional price. addition to one of the transformer electrical protections, initiates the Explosive Earth Fault r
Applications Characteristics
For all transformers from 5 to 1 000 MVA or above such as: 1- Every Depressurisation Set has a Decompression Chamber.
• hydro power plants; 2- The explosive Oil-Gases mixture is evacuated to an Oil-Gases
• outdoor substations located near buildings or habitations or outdoor Separation Tank.
substations when not equipped with Oil Collecting Ducts and Remote Oil 3- The explosive gases are channelled to a remote area where For existing transformers [8]
Storage Pit; they can burn safely, such as in an oil refinery. Document [8] details every possible configuration for adaptation
• industrial plants with high explosion risks (oil refineries, offshore plants, mines); 4- The Oil-Gases Separation Set can be shared between several on transformers already in service.
• underground substations; transformers when not located too far from each other.
• environmental sensitive areas. SERGI always uses existing
transformer interfaces in
order to avoid tank drilling
With the LTP type, the customer must accept the risk of oil fire inside the Oil Collecting Ducts and the Oil Storage Pit, as the depressurised SERGI strongly recommends the MTP type installation for existing substations or power plants,
10 CAUTION explosive gases are expelled together with the oil to the atmosphere. Therefore, special care must be given to the plant civil work design [9]. CAUTION as, when existing, the Oil Storage Pit is often located under the transformer tank. 11