Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
In 1916, Nelson and Griffin discovered that invertase “exhibited the same
activity when absorbed on a solid (charcoal or aluminium hydroxide) at the
bottom of the reaction vessel as when uniformly distributed throughout the
solution”. This discovery was the first of various enzyme immobilization
techniques currently available.
There are various methods for enzyme immobilization. These methods are as
follows:-
1. Physical adsorption.
2. Entrapment in microcapsules.
3. Ionic bonding.
4. Covalent bonding
• Selection of conditions should such that the maximize activity and stability
of enzyme occurs.
1. PHYSICAL ADSORPTION
(1) No reagents are used and only a minimum of activation steps are required.
(2) Adsorption is cheap, easily carried out, and tends to be less disruptive to
the enzymic protein than chemical means of attachment.
Advantage
a) ENCAPSULATION
Figure: MICROCAPSULES
b) LIPOSOMAL ENTRAPMENT
Liposomes are lipid bodies consisting of two layers of lipids. Phospholipids are
generally used in the preparation of liposomes. The prepared enzymes are
inserted into the lipid layers or membranes. The enzyme and the lipid are mixed
together in a flask or in a tube and shaken well to induce the enzymes for being
inserted into the lipid bodies. As a result of proper mixing, the lipid completely
surrounds the enzymes and forms liposomes.
3. IONIC BINDING
The ionic binding method relies on the ionic binding of the enzyme protein to
water-insoluble carriers containing ion-exchange residues.
The binding of an enzyme to the carrier is easily carried out, and the
conditions are much milder than those needed for the covalent binding method.
Hence, the ionic binding method causes little changes in the conformation and
the active site of the enzyme. Therefore, this method yields immobilized enzymes
with high activity in most cases.
4. COVALENT BONDING
Amino group
Carboxyl group
Sulfhydryl group
Hydroxyl group
Imidazole group
Phenolic group
Thiol group
Threonine group
Indole group
This method can be further classified into diazo, peptide and alkylation
methods according to the mode of linkage. The conditions for immobilization by
covalent binding are much more complicated and less mild than in the cases of
physical adsorption and ionic binding. Therefore, covalent binding may alter the
conformational structure and active center of the enzyme, resulting in major loss
of activity and/or changes of the substrate. However, the binding force between
enzyme and carrier is so strong that no leakage of the enzymes occurs, even in
the presence of substrate or solution of high ionic strength.
A zymogen precursor.
Covalent binding can be brought about by the following:
Diazotization ( SUPPORT--N=N—ENZYME)
(SUPPORT-CH2-NH-ENZYME, SUPPORT-CH2-S-ENZYME)
Mercury-Enzyme interchange
The active site of the enzyme must not be hindered. There must be ample
space between the enzyme and the backbone. It is possible in some cases to
increase the number of reactive residues of an enzyme in order to increase the
yield of the immobilized enzyme. This provides alternative reaction sites to those
essential for enzymatic activity. The wide variety of binding reactions and
insoluble carriers (with functional groups capable of covalent coupling or being
activated to give such groups) makes this a generally applicable method of
immobilization. This is true even if very little is known about the protein structure
or active site of the enzyme to be coupled.
5. CROSS LINKING
Since the enzyme is covalently linked to the support matrix, very little desorption
is likely using this method. Marshall (1973), for example, reported that carbamy
phosphokinase cross-linked to alkyl amine glass with glutaraldehyde lost only 16% of its
activity after continuous use in a column at room temperature for fourteen days.
The most common reagent used for cross-linking is glutaraldehyde. Cross-linking
reactions are carried out under relatively severe conditions. These harsh conditions can
change the conformation of active center of the enzyme; and so may lead to significant
loss of activity.
1. The immobilized enzymes have more stability than the free enzymes. So
the turnover of substrate into products is higher.
2. The immobilized enzymes are firmly attached to the solid support. So the
recovery of the enzyme after the completion of reaction is very easy. The
wastage of enzymes during the extraction of the product is avoided.
5. The solid materials freely allow the substrate to reach the immobilized
enzyme.
6. The cell free reaction system behaves as a model system for studying the
enzyme action of living cells.
8. The polymers need proper chemical treatment before being used for
immobilizing enzyme.
3. In dairy industry, the immobilized enzymes are used to coagulate the milk
protein during cheese-making and are also used to treat the waste whey.
The immobilized enzyme technology may help in the future for integrating
bioprocess with downstream processing with an effort to increase productivity
while minimizing the product recovery cost. Immobilized enzyme technology may
also be useful in non-aqueous enzymology, not only in terms of stabilization of
the biocatalysts but also in the development of continuous bioreactors. One of
the rapidly emerging areas in the field of sensors is the development of
biosensors for industrial process control wherein immobilized enzyme technology
play a pivotal role. Stabilization of enzymes (heat) is crucial for some of the
applications. On the other hand, cold active enzymes also may gain potentials in
certain biocoversions. It is most likely that the future developments will come
from within the industry and the role of academic researchers will probably
remain to some extent as the laying of the theoretical foundations for this work
and development of new approaches. Thus, there are interesting possibilities
within the field of immobilized enzymes and it is imminent that in the future many
applications will be replaced by immobilized systems and many more new
systems will become technically as well as commercially feasible
REFERENCE
3. http://www.wikipedia.org