Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

SAINT PETER ACADEMY OF ALEGRIA, INC.

Senior High School Department


TEACHING-LEARNING GUIDE 2018

Grade : 11 Quarter: First


Subject Title : Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person Date :

TOPIC/LESSON
Freedom of the Human Person – Deontological and Teleological Ethics
NAME
CONTENT
The learner understands the human person’s freedom.
STANDARDS
PERFORMANCE The learner shows situations that demonstrate freedom of choice and the
STANDARDS consequences of choices.
The learners are able to:
1. Realize that “all actions have consequences”.
2. Evaluate and exercise prudence in choices.
3. Realize that:
LEARNING
a. Choices have consequences.
COMPETENCIES
b. Some things are given up while others are obtained in making
choices.
4. Show situations that demonstrate freedom of choice and the
consequences of their choices.
The learners can:
SPECIFIC
 understand deontological and teleological views of normative ethics.
LEARNING
 be able to explain the two ethical views in given situations.
OUTCOMES
 evaluate moral dilemmas in everyday life.

Lesson Outline

1. Introduction: Recap of previous lessons

2. Motivation: Think, Pair, Share – Moral Dilemmas

3. Instruction and Delivery: Discussion

4. Practice & Enrichment: Situation Analysis

6. Evaluation: Philosophical Diary Entry

RESOURCES Textbook (“The Padayon Series: Making Life Worth Living – An


Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person” by Napoleon
Mabaquiao Jr., PhD, PHOENIX Publishing House)
MATERIALS Laptop, PowerPoint Presentation, Speakers

INTRODUCTION Teacher Tips


 Recap of previous lessons – Free Will Theories, Intellectual Choice vs Practical
Choice

MOTIVATION
 Examples of moral dilemmas will be given and students will pair up and share their
answers.

Guide Questions:
 What do you think about those moral dilemmas?
 Was it hard or easy in deciding which action would you take in the given situations?
 Have you experienced moral dilemmas in your life? How did you overcome it?
INSTRUCTION/DELIVERY
 Discussion: Deontological and Teleological Ethics

EXAMPLES:
Maguindanao Massacre
- Deontological view: Unethical
 Killing people is bad.
- Teleological view: Unethical
 The families of the killed journalists will be seeking justice and will
be angry to the Ampatuans.
Euthanasia or mercy killing
- Deontological view: Unethical
 Killing people is bad.
- Teleological view: Ethical
 It ends the suffering of the patient whose life can no longer be saved
due to chronic illness. It can also save lives by donating the effective
organs of the patient, and can also save money for the medicines and
hospital bills.
Terrorism
- Deontological view: Unethical
 Killing is bad.
- Teleological view: Unethical
 The families of the innocent children, women and men who were
killed by bombing or gun shooting will be in deep tears for their
loss and will be depressed by the traumatic incident.
Cardo in Probinsyano taking revenge for his son’s death
- Deontological view: Unethical
 Killing, and taking revenge is bad.
- Teleological view: Ethical
 Cardo and his family will have justice for his son’s death and will
also save a lot of innocent people who can be at any time be
victimized by the rebels/terrorists, drug addicts or drug lords and
syndicates.

PRACTICE:
Activity: Situation Analysis
 Give moral dilemmas (video clips or pictures) and let students identify the
deontological and teleological views of each situation.

ENRICHMENT
 Students will answer the following questions:
o When is an action morally good and bad?
o Which of the two forms of normative ethics appeal to you more
and tend to use more? Why?

EVALUATION Philosophical
 Philosophical Diary Entry diaries are posted
o Give three other examples of situations in real life that involves the online via Google
Deontological and Teleological views of ethics. Answer and explain your Classroom
own preference in each given situation. website/app.
Deadline:

Prepared by:

MS. GLECYL A. REQUILME

Вам также может понравиться