Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Dr. Daram
Executive Summary
This paper presents a methodology of setting standard for clerical orientated environment.
As we know, measuring performance clerical staffs is very difficult task to be done. Never the less
performance needed to be measure in order to provide a control mechanism for manager to keep
track on staffs and work on improving the productivity. In this case study the particular clerical
system presented was preparation of invoice. The number of invoices sets produced by the system
was recorded for every working hour of each day. Following this several assumptions were made
prior to attempting to set standard. This is done in order to be sensitive to the clerical working
environment and to serve as a justification for the finding. Statistical approach was chosen for data
analysis particularly descriptive statistics due to the simplicity to summarize and describe a
collection of data. Using this method the standard of 42 invoices per hour was derived. Form the
derived standards a measurement of efficiency of the current system was conducted. The finding of
the efficiency was more than 70% and less than 85%. This efficiency was one of the justifications for
the standard set because if the efficiencies were relatively high, then the standards is too
comfortable for the system and does not serve its purpose which is ultimately to increase
productivity.
i
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I
LIST OF TABLES II
LIST OF FIGURES II
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Purpose 1
1.2 Scope 1
1.3 Method 1
1.4 Assumptions 1
1.6 Background 2
2.0 FINDINGS 3
3.0 DISCUSSION 6
4.0 CONCLUSION 8
List of Tables
Table 1: Number of invoice sets produces by the system in every working hour of each day. 3
Table 2: Histogram of data set 3
Table 3: Calculation of efficiency & effectiveness. 5
List of Figures
Figure 1: Distribution pattern of the data set compared to normal distribution with the same mean and
standard deviation. 4
Figure 2: Total number of invoices per hour for the week 6
Figure 3: Efficiency & Effectiveness 7
ii
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this report was to measure performance in a clerical service orientated environment
1.2 Scope
While deriving standards it was important to consider their suitability for those operating the system
1.3 Method
The method chosen for setting standard was based on experienced workers standard. The concept
of this standard is to determine the number of invoice 68% of the population could do and chose a
standard higher than that. The standard set then will be used to calculate the efficiency. The
calculated efficiency should be preferably lesser than 85% to ensure the standards set is fair and
1.4 Assumptions
1
1.6 Background
Measuring performance is the best way to make improvement. In order to be able to make
improvements we must be able to measure the process in a quantitative manner. Quite simply, if we
don't measure, we don't really know what's going on. Psychologically, most people believe they're
performing in the upper 25% of performers until a measurement teaches them that this belief is not
true.
Measuring manufacturing process is very easily done because there always a quantitative
variable involved such as cost, or number of unit done per hour and so on. Where else in the clerical
service orientated environment it is often hard to measure and therefore even difficult to properly
control clerical work. Secondly the idea of measuring and controlling diverse activities to be found in
the office is to doubt the staffs and could result in low morale and motivation. This would greatly
reduce productivity.
Even though it is difficult to measure clerical staffs, management and staff together could
come up with a mutual agreement which could benefit to both if a methodology of measuring, able
to provide relevant information about productivity of staffs. Benchmarking is one form of easy
measurement. We measure what people do, find out who does it best and then extract the lessons
2
2.0 Findings
From the below table, the data set can be represented by a normal distribution curve. Then base on
Table 1: Number of invoice sets produces by the system in every working hour of each day.
TIME FOR THE DAY 9-10 10-11 11-12 12-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 TOTAL
MON 35 36 33 21 19 33 31 29 237
TUE 34 37 34 19 18 34 32 28 236
WED 34 36 35 20 19 35 33 26 238
THU 33 35 34 19 19 33 32 26 231
FRI 35 35 30 19 17 30 27 23 216
TOTAL 171 179 166 98 92 165 155 132 1158
With the use of Microsoft Excel 2007, the histogram and bell curve for the above population of data
Mean of the data = ∑
28.95
3
BELL CURVE OF DATA
800 25
700
20
600
500 15
400
300 10
200
5
100
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Figure 1: Distribution pattern of the data set compared to normal distribution with the same mean and standard
deviation.
Based on the mean and standard deviation obtained, the following curves were plotted. The
blue line represents the normal distribution curve with the said mean and standard deviation; where
else the red line represents the curve of the data sets in the table.
From the plot it can be seen the plot of the data sets is skewed to the right. This means that
most of the workers are able to produce more than the average of 29 invoices. Also from the
histogram it can be noticed that the number of frequency is the highest, which is 22 for the bin
range of 29 to 30 invoices. Therefore based on these observations I would set the standard to be 42
4
2.2 Measure of Efficiency & Effectiveness
From the standard derived, the efficiency and the effectiveness of the group is measured.
Efficiency (η) is the ratio of actual output attained to the standard expected output. Therefore,
efficiency indicates a measure of how well the resources are utilized to accomplish a target or result.
Effectiveness (Ø) is the degree of accomplishing the objectives. Therefore, effectiveness indicates a
Available hours – Total number of hours an employee is available or better known as working hours.
Applied Hours – Total number of hours the employee is dedicated to getting the job done or
$%%&'
( )
* $+$'$ &
)
* $&&
,$-
)
* .'+
$
( )
*
%
(-/ %
(-
( */$($( *
/
/)
%
(-/
0'-'
-1, η earned hours applied hours @ 100%
0
-/'+
**, Ø earned hours available hours @ 100%
5
3.0 Discussion
The standard of 42 invoices per hour was derived from properly studying the current
behavior of the workers according to the available data. Figure two and figure three below shows a
very predictable pattern that is mostly found in an office environment. For instance, from figure two
it can be seen that the lowest number of outputs according to the hour of the days are, from 12pm
to 2pm. This is so because, following the assumption, there are two groups for lunch. The output is
around 19 to 20 invoice for these hours each, which corresponds as almost half of the standards.
Therefore the standards set are very much fair for those operating the system because if half the
group is comfortable producing half the invoice for lunch hour, then it is pretty much attainable by
all. Moreover this is the period of the day staffs are least motivated and will be looking forward for
the break. Under this low morale situation, if they are able to produce at least half of the standard, I
believe that the standard set would not be a burden to the workers.
150 30
100 20
50 10
0 0
Week
6
As far as cost is concern, the more productive the workers are the higher the profit
margin because unit cost will be lower. This theory could be applied to this case study as well. Since
we are imposing a standard of 42 invoices per hour, the staffs need to achieve this in order to meet
their key performance index (KPI). The concern of staffs becoming demoralized due to having their
performance measured could be traded off by having a good reward and remuneration scheme.
The standard was set such that the efficiency of the workers is below 85% and above 70%.
This lower and upper limit is to allow a wider variation workers performance. Once the efficiency of
the workers reached 85%, it is time for the standard to go higher, so that the workers are within this
band gap again. This will ensure continuous improvement of the worker’s performance and yield a
higher productivity rate. From figure three, it can be seen a linear declination of efficiency and thus
effectiveness from Monday till Friday. This pattern is such because generally workers are less
motivated as it gets nearer to Friday. Therefore the standard set is able to push this efficiency levels
80%
81% 80% 81%
75% 79% Effectiveness
70% 73%
71% 70% 71%
65% 69% Optimum Efficiency
64% before new standard
60%
change
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
7
4.0 Conclusion
The above study shows the methodology for setting standards for clerical service orientated
environment, whereby the task of the workers were to produce invoices. By taking statistical
approach, the pattern of distribution of the data set was able to provide sufficient information to set
a standard. As a conclusion, I believe that the standard of 42 invoices per hour will be comfortable to
the workers and very much be reasonable in terms of cost. Never the less this would also greatly
benefit the managers to track the performance of their workers and departments. The
implementation of the standards too would provide relevant information to manager for making
decision when it comes to appraisal of the workers. This would be very fair system for both the