Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

Verba Legis

Plain-meaning rule Verba Intentioni


When the law is clear, plain and free Words shall be willing to follow the
from ambiguity, there’s no need for intent, and not the intent to the
construction, only interpretation. words.
Because the duty of the courts is to
Ratione Cessat Lex Et Cessat
apply the law in its literal meaning and
take the law as what it is when it is When the reason of the law ceases,
clear, plain and free from ambiguity. the law itself ceases.
Contemporanea Expositio Est Optima

Legis Interpretado Legis Vimobtinet Contemporaneous Construction is the


strongest in law.
The interpretation of the Supreme
Court becomes part of the law of the
land, and is binding to all the lower Optimus Interpres Rerum Usus
courts.
The best interpreter of law is its usage.
Stare Decisis
When the Supreme Court has once
laid down a principle applicable to a Index Animi Sermo
certain set of facts, it will adhere to Speech is the index of the law.
that principle and apply it to all its
Dura Lex Sed Lex
future cases with almost the same or
similar set of substantial facts. The law may be harsh, but it is the law.
Hoc Quidem Prequam Durum
Lex Prospicit Non Respicit It is exceedingly hard but so the law is
written.
The law looks forward not backward.
Ratio Legis
The reason of the law is its soul.
Nemo Tenetur Ad Imposible The legislature made no classification
in the use of a general word or
The law obliges no one to do the
expression.
impossible.
Ex Necessitate Legis – Doctrine of
Necessary Implication Verba Accipienda Sunt Secundum
Materiam
What is implied in the statute is as
much as part of it as that what it is A word is to be understood in the
expressed. context in which it is used.
What is implied should not be against
the law as long as it is constitutional.
Noscitur A Sociis
Where the law does not define a
In Eo Guod Plus Sit Inest Etminus word, or if a word is ambiguous in its
meaning, it will be construed as having
The greater includes the lesser.
meaning similar to that of he words
accompanied by it.
Generale Dictum Generaliter Est Ejusdem Generis
Interpretandum
When a general word follows an
What is generally spoken must be enumeration of particular and specific
generally understood. words of the same class, it is to be
restricted to persons, things or cases
of the same kind as those specifically
Generalia Verba Sunt Generaliter mentioned.
Intelligenda
A general statement is understood in
a general sense. Expressio Unius Est exclusio alterius
Express mention of one person, thing
or consequence implies the exclusion
Ubi Lex Non Disinguit of all the others.
Where the law does distinguish, the -known as the negative opposite
courts shall not distinguish. doctrine
Casus Omissus pro Omisso Habendus Pari Materia
Est
When the relate to the same person or
A person, object, or thing omitted thing, have the same purpose, or
from an enumeration must be held to object, or cover the same specific or
have been omitted intentionally. particular subject matter

Optima Statuti interpretatix


Ad proximum antecedens The best interpreter of a statute is the
statute itself.
Relative words refer to the nearest
antecedent, unless the context
otherwise requires.
Interpretare et concordance leges
Every statute must be so construed
The use of comma to separate and harmonized with other statutes as
antecedent from the rest exerts a to form a uniform system of
dominant influence in this doctrine jurisprudence.

Redendo Singal Singulis Distingue Tempora et concordabis


jura
Referring each to each
Let each be put in its proper places
When 2 or more statures on the same
Words should be taken distributively
subject were enacted at different
times and under dissimilar
Proviso circumstances or conditions, their
interpretations should be in
- To limit or restrict the general accordance with the circumstances
language or operation of the and conditions peculiar to each.
statute, not to enlarge it
- Provided, but nothing herein
Ut Res Magis Valeat
That Construction is to be sought
which gives effect to the whole of the
statute.

Interpretatio Fienda Est ut Res Magis


A portion of a statute should not be
construed to destroy the other.
A law should be interpreted with a
view upholding rather than destroying
it.

Вам также может понравиться