Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
On
Submitted to
Professor
University of Dhaka
Submitted by
Team Name:
“Global Managers”
Name Roll
Faisal Ahmed Reefat 261
Amirul Islam Titas 262
Ahmadullah 263
1
Letter of Transmittal
January 24th, 2012
Dr. Md. Ataur Rahman
Professor
Department of Management Studies,
University of Dhaka.
In the course of the preparation of this assignment, we have studied various documents and
also gathered practical knowledge. In this assignment, we have tried to give my best effort.
Besides this, there may be shortcomings. We shall be pleased to answer any kind of query
you think necessary.
Now, we have placed this report before you for your kind approval. For any of your further
queries, we would be at your disposal at your convenience.
Sincerely Yours,
“Global Managers”, MBA (SIM), 13th Batch,
Name Roll
Faisal Ahmed Reefat 261
Amirul Islam Titas 262
Ahmadullah 263
2
Acknowledgement
It is hard today to use the word "globalization" without a certain sense of irony, rueful or
otherwise. Raven by Ideology, religion, and mistrust, the world seems more fragmented,
more at odds, than at any time. But, however deep the political divisions, business
operations continue to span the globe and executives still have to figure out how to run
them efficiently and well. There is a proverb regarding the future:
Global Managers have the same attributes just as the above. The main challenge here is to
integrate and coordinate these individuals in ways that will ensure success. People from
different cultures tend to misunderstand each other's behaviors or stereotype people from
other countries. It is essential to recognize the discrepancies between cultures in order to
work together effectively.
For this reason, it is our great privilege to express our gratitude to our creator Almighty for
such great opportunity to be in touch with some these evolutionary business concepts. We
also have to put our heartened feelings and gratitude for the kindness and assistance that
was provided to us to complete our assigned report as on the topic “The Global Manager.”
In preparing the proposed report we have taken great assistance, support and guidance
from the various professionals, articles, journals etc.
We also give our sincerest thankfulness to our course instructor “Professor Dr. Ataur
Rahman”, Department of Management Studies, University of Dhaka, to give us such an
opportunity to face these kinds of endeavors and provide platform to furnish our business
knowledge in the context of “International Management” and become effective and
3
efficient manager to make the business world more evolving and be a truly globalized
manager.
Preface
Success in today's international climate - a far cry from only a decade ago - demands
highly specialized yet closely linked groups of global business managers, country or
regional managers, and worldwide functional managers. This kind of organization
characterizes a transnational rather than an old-line multinational, interactional, or global
company. Transnational’s integrate assets, resources, and diverse people in operating units
around the world. Through a flexible management process, in which business, country, and
functional managers form a triad of different perspectives that balance one another,
transnational companies can build three strategic capabilities: global-scale efficiency and
competitiveness; national level responsiveness and flexibility; and cross-market capacity to
leverage learning on a worldwide basis.
While traditional organizations, structured along product or geographic lines, can hone one
or another of these capabilities, they cannot cope with the challenge of all three at once.
But an emerging group of transnational companies has begun to transform the classic
hierarchy of headquarters-subsidiary relationships into an integrated network of specialized
yet interdependent units. For many, the greatest constraint in creating such an organization
4
is a severe shortage of executives with the skills, knowledge, and sophistication to operate
in a more tightly linked and less classically hierarchical network. In fact, in the volatile
world of transnational corporations, there is no such thing as a universal global
manager. Rather, there are four groups of Specialists;
And there are the top executives at corporate headquarters, the leaders who manage the
complex interactions among the four and can identify and develop the talented executives a
successful transnational requires.
5
Introduction:
The global manager is a multidimensional individual who has developed the mind-set and
competencies to effectively function anywhere in the world. This individual is
knowledgeable in the arts, history, science, and the culture and psychology of people. It is
recognized that the standard managerial skills and competencies are not enough for the
global manager. He has to master more than concepts and theories. He will also have to
command new skills.
However there are certain competencies that only the global manager would require to be
effective. They are crucial to the function of the global manager in the global environment.
The design of the framework is important. It implies that all the competencies outlined are
interdependent of each other. One set of competencies cannot be achieved without
possessing the others and no one competency has greater weight than the other.
6
Definition of Global Managers:
"When going global, you have to communicate to everyone what the company vision is
and what the long term goals are. And then you have to follow through and design
processes that force the interaction to continue. Every single employee must believe that
there is a great value in managing the company in an integrated way. To do that, you have
to bring people together on real projects that tackle real problems or that explores
opportunities on a cross border basis.”
In a 1992 article for Harvard Business Review, HBS professor Christopher A. Bartlett and
co-author Sumantra Ghoshal tackled the question, "What is a Global manager?" Their
answer then was that "there is no such thing as a universal global manager." Indeed,
multinationals required three kinds of specialists: business managers, country managers,
and functional managers, with a group of senior executives to coordinate the efforts of the
specialists.
In 2003, as globalization has become a much more pressing issue and the talents of global
managers are in high demand, has Bartlett changed his views? Cynthia D. Churchwell
interviewed him at his office at Harvard Business School.
Cynthia Churchwell: Since your article "What is a Global Manager?" was first published
in the Harvard Business Review eleven years ago, what key differences have you seen in
global managers? How have your own views changed?
7
Christopher Bartlett: Well, fortunately, the basic argument has held up. But the world has
evolved and we do see some new patterns emerging. But first let's focus on the things that
have stayed constant.
Today, global managers need to see the world not just as a collection of national
marketplaces, but also as a source of scarce information, knowledge, and expertise—the
key resources required in the development and diffusion of innovation worldwide. So this
increasingly important capability really is about using one's global presence to promote
worldwide innovation and learning.
Now these three strategic imperatives have to be reflected in the multinational company's
organizational capability. And that is where the role of the global manager is shaped. We
argued that companies should not define this as an offline specialist role, but neither must
they try to make everyone global managers. Rather, there are three key groups who should
be involved.
Another big change is that companies are finally recognizing that being global is not just
about entering incremental overseas markets. It is also about accessing scarce resources.
And the scarcest of all resources is the human resource, particularly management. So the
assumption that "all the smart, capable people were born within a ten-mile radius of our
head office" is being eroded. As an Australian, I am aware that the current CEOs of
Kellogg and of Coca-Cola, and the last CEOs of Ford and Philip Morris, are all
Australians. And a recent BusinessWeek cover story tracked the impact that Indian
managers have had on American management.
To sum up, a major challenge for global companies is to develop a cadre of managers, who
can understand and respond to the needs of the international business environment. These
managers need to go beyond a narrow national perspective towards a multidimensional
view, which takes into account the requirements of the entire global system. In other
words, these companies have to create a cadre of people who are comfortable with 'global'
careers.
8
Nomenclature of Global Managers:
The term “Global Manager” implies diverse managerial roles being played by a manager.
These roles are named as below:
1. Business Managers
2. Country Managers
The building blocks for most worldwide companies are their national subsidiaries. If the
global business manager's primary objective is to achieve global-scale efficiency and
competitiveness, the national subsidiary manager's is to be sensitive and responsive to the
local market. Country managers play the pivotal role not only in meeting local customer
needs but also in satisfying the host government's requirements and defending their
company's market positions against local and external competitors. The need for local
flexibility often puts the country manager in conflict with the global business manager.
3. Functional Managers
While global business managers and country managers have come into their own,
functional specialists have yet to gain the recognition due them in many traditional
multinational companies. Relegated to support-staff roles, excluded from important
9
meetings, and even dismissed as unnecessary overhead, functional managers are often
given little chance to participate in, let alone contribute to, the corporate mainstream's
global activity. In some cases, top management has allowed staff functions to become a
warehouse for corporate misfits or a graveyard for managerial has-beens. Yet at a time
when information, knowledge, and expertise have become more specialized, an
organization can gain huge benefits by linking its technical, manufacturing, marketing,
human resources, and financial experts worldwide.
4. Corporate Manager
Clearly, there is no single model for the global manager. Neither the old-line international
specialist nor the more recent global generalist can cope with the complexities of cross-
border strategies. Indeed, the dynamism of today's marketplace calls for managers with
diverse skills. Responsibility for worldwide operations belongs to senior business, country,
and functional executives who focus on the intense interchanges and subtle negotiations
required. In contrast, those in middle management and frontline jobs need well-defined
responsibilities, a clear understanding of their organization's transnational mission, and a
sense of accountability-but few of the distractions senior negotiators must shoulder.
Despite nearly two decades of corporate globalization efforts, many organizations still
struggle to find managers who are comfortable and effective in the increasingly global
economy. Most suffer both from a lack of cultural awareness when dealing with employees
and partners overseas and from a lack of experience managing increasingly complex
processes over long distances. Though a few insightful corporate giants such as General
10
Electric, Cisco Systems, and Intel have made strides in developing successful global
managers, many human resources leaders and senior executives continue to be frustrated
with the available skills and resources
The dawn of the Internet has triggered companies around the world to open their doors and
reach out to customers around the world. In order to run an international company so
much more efficiently and economically, the term ‘global Manager’ was created that
not only emphasized in protecting the well being of the company, but also function as
quality assurance to its customers around the globe.
b. Preparing the local managers: Once the global manager has been successfully
installed in foreign country; he usually teaches the local managers this expertise.
c. Accelerating the local growth: applying the dexterity, a global manager helps to
accelerate the growth a firm as well as the host country’s economy.
d. Utilizing the host country’s resources: All the countries have its own natural
resources. But all are not adept enough to utilize those efficiently. The global
manager can use his expertise to utilize the local resources.
e. Creating employment: It is not a true concept that a global manager takes the seat
of a local manager. But with his knowledge and experience, he creates more jobs
for the local people.
11
Critical Competencies of a Global Manager:
The global manager is a multidimensional individual who has developed the mind-set and
competencies to effectively function anywhere in the world. This individual is
knowledgeable in the arts, history, science, and the culture and psychology of people.
Below is a summary of the Seven (7) critical competencies from an INSEAD questionnaire
of more than 1,500 international managers.
1. Strategic Awareness:
The fundamental requirements of this competency are the continual
acquisition of information and the ability to synthesize that information to
produce new knowledge.
3.
Sensitivity to Different Cultures:
The vital keys to cultural sensitivity are based upon resolving two
fundamental issues of human relationship: human equality and
ethnocentrism.
4. Ability to Work on International (or Multicultural) Teams:
International (or multicultural) teams are an absolute necessity for a
global operation. The fundamental requirements are valuing and
integrating cultural diversity to create a competitive advantage and
win/win situations.
5. Language Skills:
It is an inevitable necessity that any global manager be multilingual;
12
particularly with those countries where he or she conducts regular
business. It should be a necessity for those expatriates residing in
countries (or cultures) where the language is different from their native
language.
6. International Negotiating:
The essential competency in negotiation is to find a solution or an
agreement which is of mutual benefit to everyone involved. A successful
negotiation is a win/win situation for everyone.
d. Developing country-specific corporate strategies that take into account the political
as well as economic imperatives.
13
e. Forming and benefiting from collaborative arrangement around the world.
This review might lead the reader to conclude that an effective global manager is
superhuman. But keeping in mind the necessity of teamwork and the potential support to
the manager through effective organizational design, systems, and processes, the prospect
of developing global skills might be seen as an exciting challenge rather than an impossible
task. To develop skills to the level necessary will be a lifelong process because the
demands will likely expand along with the global economy. Each of us needs to continue to
improve in the aforementioned areas as we move through the beginning of the new century.
14
Global managers can more specifically be seen in terms of three prototypical roles in a
global organization. These are:
2. The country managers who bridge between the local market operations
and global business objectives of the organization.
These three archetypes show that the knowledge and experience to carry out global work
can be fostered and expressed through an integrated network of specialized global talent.
In this way, we see that global experience is not tethered exclusively to the event of
expatriation but can be done by managers (whether at home or abroad) through their
globally-focused activities and responsibilities.
Global managers possess a certain perspective among the workforce, which uniquely
focuses them to operate in a globalised environment of diverse markets and cultures. They
need to manage information and resources from all parts of the world at once, not only
individual countries or regions, and integrate this for the development and diffusion of
innovation on a global scale. Today's global managers may be developed within traditional
corporate career paths. However, we are increasingly seeing employees starting out as
global managers as well. This is often the case with firms that are ‘born global’, such as
companies whose local markets are too small and so must operate immediately in a global
context.
15
Functions of the Global Manager
Global competition has forced businesses to change how they manage at home and abroad.
The increasing rate of change, technological advances, shorter product life cycles, and
high-speed communications are all factors that contribute to these changes. The new
management approach focuses on establishing a new communication system that features a
high level of employee involvement. Organizational structures must also be flexible
enough to change with changing market conditions. Ongoing staff development programs
and design-control procedures, which are understandable and acceptable, are outcomes
from this new approach. Management values are changing, and managers must now have a
vision and be able to communicate the vision to everyone in the firm.
Although the international manager performs the same basic functions as the domestic
manager, he must adjust to more variables and environments. Therefore, each of the five
basic management functions must change when operating in a foreign market.
a. Planning
b. Organizing
c. Staffing
d. Leading
e. Controlling
I. Planning
The first stage of international planning is to decide how to do business globally: whether
to export, to enter into licensing agreements or joint ventures, or to operate as a
multinational corporation with facilities in a foreign country.
To develop forecasts, goals, and plans for international activities, the manager must
monitor environments very closely. Key factors include political instability, currency
16
instability, and competition from governments, pressures from governments, patent and
trademark protection, and intense competition.
International firms should be sure that their plans fit the culture of the host country.
Typically, U.S. firms feel that long-term plans should be three to five years in length; but in
some cultures, this time period is too short. Many countries must plan with the assistance
of governmental agencies. And working through bureaucratic structures, policies, and
procedures is often time-consuming.
II. Organizing
International businesses must be organized so that they can adapt to cultural and
environmental differences. No longer can organizations just put “carbon copies” or clones
of themselves in foreign countries. An international firm must be organized so that it can be
responsive to foreign customers, employees, and suppliers. An entire firm may even be
organized as one giant worldwide company that has several divisions. Above all, the new
organization must establish a very open communication system where problems, ideas, and
grievances can quickly be heard and addressed at all levels of management. Without this,
employees will not get involved, and their insights and ideas are crucial to the success of
the business.
17
b) International division stage. Pressure may mount through the enforcement of host
country laws, trade restrictions, and competition, placing a company at a cost
disadvantage. When a company decides to defend and expand its foreign market
position by establishing marketing or production operations in one or more host
countries, it establishes a separate international division. In turn, foreign operations
begin, and a vice president, reporting directly to the president or CEO, oversees the
operations.
d. The technology used in the domestic division has far outstripped that of the
international division.
As foreign operations become more important to the bottom line, decision making becomes
more centralized at corporate headquarters. A functional product group, geographic
approach, or a combination of these approaches should be adopted. The firm unifies
international activities with worldwide decisions at world headquarters.
III. Staffing
Because obtaining a good staff is so critical to the success of any business, the hiring and
development of employees must be done very carefully. Management must be familiar
18
with the country's national labor laws. Next, it must decide how many managers and
personnel to hire from the local labor force and whether to transfer home-based personnel.
For example, U.S. firms are better off hiring local talent and using only a few key
expatriates in most cases, because the costs of assigning U.S.–based employees to positions
overseas can be quite expensive. Simply, expatriates (people who live and work in another
country) are expensive propositions even when things go well. Adding up all the extras—
higher pay, airfare for family members, moving expenses, housing allowances, education
benefits for the kids, company car, taxes, and home leave—means that the first year abroad
often costs the multinational company many times the expatriate's base salary. The total bill
for an average overseas stay of four years can easily top $1 million per expatriate. In any
case, managers need to closely examine how to select and prepare expatriates.
IV. Directing
Cultural differences make the directing function more difficult for the international
manager. Employee attitudes toward work and problem solving differ by country.
Language barriers also create communication difficulties. To minimize problems arising
from cultural differences, organizations are training managers in cross-cultural
management. Cross-cultural management trains managers to interact with several cultures
and to value diversity.
In addition, the style of leadership that is acceptable to employees varies from nation to
nation. In countries like France and Germany, informal relations with employees are
discouraged. In Sweden and Japan, however, informal relations with employees are
strongly encouraged, and a very participative leadership style is used. Incentive systems
also vary tremendously. The type of incentives used in the U.S. may not work in Europe or
Japan, where stable employment and benefits are more important than bonuses.
V. Controlling
19
Geographic dispersion and distance, language barriers, and legal restrictions complicate the
controlling function. Meetings, reporting, and inspections are typically part of the
international control system.
The IMC function/tools that a global manager uses are of four types.
20
a) The Foundation - corporate image and brand management; buyer behavior; promotions
opportunity analysis.
d) Integration Tools - Internet Marketing; IMC for small business and entrepreneurial
ventures; evaluating and integrated marketing program.
21
(1) Knowledge competencies;
(2) Interpersonal competencies; and
(3) Personal competencies.
General
Competencies
Of Global
Managers
International Diversity
Inquisitiveness
knowledge management
23
SharePoint Server, Skype, Microsoft Groove 2007, Google Apps, and instant messaging
tools such as MSN Messenger (P. Culmsee, personal communication. May 3, 2008).
Solutions such as those listed above may not be required by all managers as it depends on
the type of industry they are in, and the organization itself.
b) International knowledge
Competency in this field means an understanding of the different socio-political and
economic policies governing each country. A global organization operates world-wide
abiding by the rules and regulations that govern that particular nation. Therefore it is
essential to clearly understand the structure of these systems, their decision-making
processes, and how they impact business operations and those around them (Whitfield
2003). Subject matter such as international finance, international law, and comparative
labour relations should be familiar to the global manager (Caligiuri 2006). Knowledge in
this field not only assists in penetrating foreign markets distribution networks (Tan,
Erramilli, and Liang 2001) and the smooth running of the business but it can be a
competitive advantage.
Take Procter & Gamble for example. In the early 1980’s, in their fight for higher margins
from the pharmaceutical industry, Indian pharmacists nationwide targeted the company by
boycotting Vicks products. Gurcharan Das, CEO of Procter & Gamble’s Indian subsidiary
realized that the Vicks products contained all natural herbal ingredients, found in the age-
old Sanskrit texts. Products compliant under this Ayurvedic system of medicine in India
could be sold in food shops, general stores, and street kiosks. Das proved this compliance
to the Delhi government and the local FDA and had the registration changed from Western
medicine to Indian medicine. With the new registration, the company was able to expand
its distribution channel beyond pharmacies and build a new plant for Vicks, enjoying the
tax-advantages and lower labour costs (Das 1994, 197-210).
24
managers value and manage cultural diversity and consider this diversity an asset not a
hindrance (Caligiuri 2006). Nardon and Steers (2008) state that many inter-culture
assignments occur on short notice thereby giving managers limited time to learn about that
particular culture, and intimate understanding of the cultural diversity may be difficult due
to geography. In these circumstances cultural and cross-cultural awareness is learnt “on the
fly”. Despite the obstacles, understanding this diversity will be of great benefit to the
global managers.
Procter & Gamble will be mentioned again to illustrate this issue in relation to business.
Das (1994, 197-210) noticed that the company had trouble selling Vicks Vaporub to
Northern India, whereas sales in the South were high. He decided to capitalize on the high
market sales in the South instead of attempting to correct the market in the North. The
company profited. Das later discovered that the reason for the poor sales in the North was
due to the fact that people in this region did not like to rub things on their body. Had Das
ignored the market trend and decided to expend resources attempting to impose the product
on the North, poor sales figures would likely have continued as products would remain on
the shelves.
25
e) Global risk management
Parker (2005, 468) quotes Mihaly Simai’s definition of international risk as “important,
potential disturbing and destabilizing factors or acts originating with, or generated by,
various actors on different structural levels, and having spillover consequences for other
members of the international community”. Some of these risks include political, currency-
exchange, and corruption. Globalization provides many potential techniques to allow
global managers to improve the organization’s bottom line, from the productivity gains of
operating in lower cost countries to the ability to leverage global position in pricing
negotiation with suppliers. Due to the nature of their role, the global manager would need
to have a higher risk tolerance level to deal with uncertainty in the global market. However,
there have been cases where appropriate safeguards have not been taken to assess and
minimize risk. An excellent example of the differences in risk management maturity
occurred in early 2000 (SCM n.d).
26
f) Best Practice standards
In a highly competitive global market it is advantageous for the global managers, and thus
the organization, to understand and comply with/implement best practice standards as those
involved in business have higher expectations and standards. These standards exist to
provide independently verifiable assurance to a variety of stakeholders, assuring these
stakeholders that the organization is performing in accordance with the requirements of
these standards. Examples of these are legislative frameworks: SOX and HIPAA
(Healthcare) in the USA, and BASEL II (financial risk management) in the European
Union; Compliance frameworks such as GAAP (Accounting), COBiT, COSO (control
frameworks), ISO9001 (Quality); Frameworks to improve process/visibility such as Six
Sigma, LEAN, and Kaizen; Frameworks to improve specific disciplines such as PMBOK
and, Prince II (Project Management) (P. Culmsee, personal communication. May 4, 2008).
Managers must also incorporate ethics and corporate social responsibility into their
business as part of best practice. This voluntary benchmarking can build trust, demonstrate
that they possess integrity and honesty, and can be a competitive advantage as it will
enhance reputation. Environmental and social ethics and business were once seen as
opposite ends of the business spectrum however, with increasing social awareness and
empowerment, society and NGOs are leading the way to ensure that industries are
respectful of community and the environment. As businesses increasingly come under fire
for their lack of environmental and social ethics, it is safe to conclude that embracing
ethics and CRS is good business practice.
2. Interpersonal competencies:
It is not sufficient for global managers to only gain knowledge but also critical for them to
possess the appropriate skills to transfer this knowledge into action effectively.
Interpersonal competencies are those that relate to the social/relationship interaction or
management of others. Competency in this area will lead to fruitful results when dealing
with others. These competencies, acculturation, diversity management, leading and
27
motivating a diverse workforce, cultural networking skills, creation and conveyance of a
clear vision, and capacity for managing uncertainty and conflict in the global environment,
are described below.
a) Acculturation
“Acculturation is the process whereby the attitudes and/or behaviors of people from one
culture are modified as a result of contact with a different culture” (Maxwell n.d.).
Awareness of cross-cultural differences is vital but not enough. The challenge for the
global managers, after gaining cross-cultural knowledge, is the willingness and ability to
embrace and integrate multiple perspectives (Aycan 2001, 119-135) and use it to their
advantage. To achieve this they must learn to let go of their own cultural certainty,
unquestioned acceptance of basic assumptions, personal frames of references, unexamined
life, accustomed role or status, social reinforcement knowledge, accustomed habits and
activities, and known routines (Osland 2001, 137-156), accept that differences do matter
(but not inferior), be open and receptive to new ideas, ready to accept another perspective
(Rifkin 2006) and be able to master both non-verbal and verbal communications (Jokinen
2005) pertinent to the culture. Caligiuri (2006) recommends fluency in language to assist in
effective verbal communication.
An example of how acculturation will benefit the global manager can be demonstrated by
the understanding of a brief explanation of the Japanese negotiation style (Adachi n.d.).
Japan still maintains a hierarchical business structure. Prior to commencing the negotiation,
they ascertain their standing/ranking and that of their organization in respect to others.
Their language is indirect, ambiguous and controlled (agreeable) as harmony and the
concept of ‘face-saving’ is important to them. The subject matter is talked around rather
than being approached directly. Even if they have strong views or oppose someone else’s
view, they will avoid offence preferring to skate around the subject so as to maintain the
relationship. They value long-term relationship over short-term monetary gain. If an
agreement cannot be reached, they are more likely to change the subject or ignore it all
together. Information gathering about the other is important and negotiations will not be
28
commenced until they obtain what is needed. A broad agreement is first made from the
negotiation, and detailed agreements later.
b) Diversity management
Managers who perceive diversity as important and have the ability to manage this diversity
can leverage these differences for mutual business gains (Whitfield 2003). Managing
diversity pertains to the ability to co-ordinate groups of people from differing backgrounds,
characterized by culture, gender, age, religion, etc., working effectively and productively
together on the same tasks. To manage diversity effectively, the organization’s culture must
value its diversity. For behavior and thinking to change this value of diversity must be
embedded in processes and structures (Parker 2005). With globalization comes culture
diversity. To be successful, it is crucial for global managers to be competent in this skill.
29
relationship with others is critical. Khan (2007) believes that the adage “It doesn’t matter
what you know, it’s who you know that matters” holds true in most countries. To further
themselves and their organization Khan suggests that it is necessary for global managers to
develop good relations with the “influential and effective people” around the world who
will impact the business positively.
30
negotiation, interviewing, and non-verbal cues), ability to scan the world for information,
and an understanding of diversity and its impact are a necessity.
3. Personal competencies:
The fundamental personal characteristics or traits of a person will not only affect the
attainment of knowledge but also how and if the knowledge will be executed. Knowledge
and skills alone do not make a global manager. It is the personal traits of the person that
will drive the acquisition of the knowledge and affect how the skills are performed.
a) Self-awareness/Emotional Intelligence
To be self-aware, the global managers would have an astute insight of how they are
perceived by others, clear insight of themselves, and a clear insight of their own roles with
respect to others in the group (Maznevski and Zander 2001). Self-awareness will assist
towards the development of emotional intelligence, which is “the subset of social
intelligence that involves the ability to monitor one’s own and others’ feelings and
emotions, to discriminate among them and to use this information to guide one’s thinking
and actions” (Salovey and Mayer, 1990). It is this deep understanding and intuitiveness of
self and others that will assist the manager to transform and develop.
b) Inquisitiveness
The inquisitive mind is one that has an insatiable demand for knowledge. It will assist
global managers in seeking information and strive for continuous learning (Parker 2005).
The inquisitive mind will question and probe until the best course of actions and results are
obtained. Global managers with inquisitive minds are adventurous and will always have
up-to-date knowledge and skills to achieve their goals.
31
just and fair and will do what is best for others. Global managers with honesty and integrity
will ensure that best practice standards are implemented and maintained. Employees
working for them will be empowered (Parker 2005). This trait will assist the global
managers to lead and motivate their team. The case below, taken from Parker’s (2005, 387)
book, demonstrates the ultimate act of integrity through leading by example and trust
building, exemplified by the actions of Norbert Reinhart.
d) Open-mindedness
Global managers with open minds are less likely to be judgmental and view diversity as
inferior. They will be more receptive to new experiences and ideas, and be able to see and
accept change more readily (Caligiuri 2006).
e) Adaptable/flexible
This is the capacity to adjust or vary one’s thoughts and thus behavior according to the
immediate requirements of the condition or situation. An adaptable or flexible mind will
assess and analyze the foreign culture, compromise, and then find innovative and creative
ways to arrive at a solution (Stahl 2001, 197-210).
f) Optimism
Optimism is a mindset that looks on the positive side of a given situation. Optimistic
managers are forward thinkers, will most likely persevere, learn from their mistakes, and
encourage and motivate others to succeed. They themselves will be more motivated and
pro-active. This positive outlook will also assist the global managers to cope in unfamiliar
and uncertain situations and people (Jokinen 2005).
g) Empathy
Empathy is a genuine understanding, concern and respect for another’s thoughts, feelings,
needs, motives and assumptions and one’s capacity to respond to those factors
appropriately. Empathetic managers will consider someone else’s situation, “show
appropriate discretion”, and “argues from position of the host country” (Stahl 2001, 197-
210). This trait will assist the global managers in their relationship with people worldwide
as their listening skills will improve, and are able to appreciate differing viewpoints. This
32
understanding of others will lead to cross-cultural sensitivity and expertise in global human
resource management (Jokinen 2005).
Rhinesmith sees those with global mindsets to always drive for the bigger, broader picture;
accept the balance of contradictions; look towards organizational processes rather than
structure when dealing with uncertainty; value and leverage diversity of teamwork and
play to their advantage; view change as an opportunity rather than a hindrance; and open to
surprises, embracing challenge and uncertainty, and always question the status quo. They
are proactive and their thoughts and actions are not limited to boundaries. They have the
ability to effectively manage competition, complexity, adaptability, diverse teams,
uncertainty, and learning. Rhinesmith also characterizes them as having astute knowledge
in technology, business and the industry; highly developed conceptual capacity; flexibility
to deal with the constant changing global and local market demands; sensitivity to cultural
diversity; judgment in making risky decisions with little information; and the capacity for
reflection in seeking continuous improvement.
33
competencies but in a very distinctive way. In our view these competencies fall into four
distinct areas.
a) Business leadership
Business leadership in a global company has very specific challenges. In new markets,
particularly new international markets, there is an overriding imperative to form strategic
alliances and partnerships. Whether due to the need to gain distribution in a foreign
environment, to gain lower cost production through scale, or to navigate the regulatory
environment of foreign countries; the ability to build alliances and business partnerships is
a key to successful business leadership in new markets.
b) Functional leadership
Functional leadership is typically defined in terms of the specific functional skills an
individual brings to a business situation. In the context of a globalizing company specific
34
functional skills are often critical and relate to the challenges facing the business, such as
in the areas of marketing, manufacturing or logistics.
But over and above the specific functional requirements of a particular situation, deep
skills in a functional area of relevance are critical because they give the global manager
credibility. The executive brings something to the party. He or she has neither simply been
'parked' by the corporation nor are they passing through as part of a career development
plan. This is most relevant in situations where there has been high turnover of expatriate
managers who, often due to the short tenure of their appointment, have not had a positive
or lasting impact on local operations.
One way that functional leadership is demonstrated very tangibly in the context of global
companies is in the individual's ability to leverage the corporate network. Is he, or she,
plugged in? Can the leader get his or hands on the necessary information from head office?
Can the leader get decisions made quickly and efficiently?
Successful functional leadership also requires the individual to maintain a functional edge.
It is imperative that the leader does not become isolated from best practice. This is
especially true of executives leading operations in isolated situations such as parts of
China. The successful global executive must continue to invest in the development of his
or her functional area of competence, even when based in remote locations.
c) Team leadership
Team leadership is the first of the two 'soft' competencies that we believe sets successful
global business leaders apart from other managers. Global markets are typically
35
characterized by rapid change and a high degree of uncertainty. Typically, the dominant
culture of the working environment is alien to that of the business leader and the
organization’s operations can cover a large and diverse geography.
Keeping the team focused and motivated in such an environment creates particular team
leadership challenges for the manager of an internationalizing business. Mentoring,
coaching, motivating, and even day-to-day communication can be difficult in an
environment where cultural norms, symbols and values are all fundamentally different to
those of the leader.
Leading change is particularly challenging in new and emerging markets. The political,
regulatory and business landscape can change quickly and without warning, as has been
the case in South East Asia in recent years. In China, for example the Government will
often change the regulatory environment, seemingly on a whim, creating dramatically new
competitive dynamics overnight. The ability to communicate a consistent vision, and
inspire the troops to action in such an environment, requires a special kind of leadership.3
d) Personal leadership
Personal leadership is the other 'soft' competency that defines successful managers,
particularly in the context of internationalizing companies. This, perhaps more than the
other competencies, sets successful global managers apart from their domestic
counterparts. We often forget how much we rely on our home environment for support and
structure. Our family life, sports clubs or religious affiliations, all provide rhythm and
context for our business activities.
Business leaders in the international context often lack these supports and accordingly
require a level of personal leadership well beyond what is typically needed in a domestic
environment. For the executive who is constantly travelling, living in hotels, regularly
crossing time zones and doing business over meals and late evenings, it is challenging to
maintain energy and balance. It takes discipline, focus and maturity.
36
Another aspect of personal leadership that is specific to working in foreign environments
relates to cultural identity. If an executive is to be successful working in another culture he
or she must demonstrate a deep respect for, and sensitivity to, cultural differences. This
does not mean however those successful managers 'go native'. To the contrary, if the
individual is to be truly respected by the local team, he or she must also remain grounded
in his or her own culture and national identity. Finding this balance is a defining
characteristic of the most successful global managers.
Although this trend could be seen as a positive step in the globalization process of
American companies, there is a question about whether the real reason for the reduction
was Americans’ inability to function abroad successfully. Estimates of expatriate failure
37
rate run between 20 percent and 50 percent, and the average cost per failure to the parent
company ranges from $55,000 to $150,000. There are studies claiming the failure rate is
between 30 and 70 percent. The accurate identification of the actual rate of failure is less
important than how high the range is. The fact that this range represents a large number of
managers who cannot function successfully in other culture is disturbing. The reduction in
expatriate personnel also has ramifications for strategic management and control, such as
less identification with, and knowledge about, the globe operations and organization, and
less control by headquarters over local subsidiaries. Thus:
38
stay. The integration dimension represents the intensity of the exposure. A person
could be sent for a short term, technical, trouble-shooting matter and experience
little significant contact with the local culture. On the other hand, a person could be
sent for brief negotiation where the cultural interaction could be very intense. So,
the training is different and it depends of the dimension of the visit. Effective
preparation would also stress the realities and difficulties of working in another
culture and the importance of establishing good working relationships with the
locals.
c) Repatriation: Selecting the right people, train them up, and sending them to
foreign posting is not the end of the exercise. Getting these people back and
integrated into the company so that the company can continue to benefit from their
experience and expertise has been shown to be a problem. Research suggests that
the average repatriation failure rate. Those people who return from an overseas
assignment and then leave their companies within on year is 25%. To hold them in
the company, they need to adopt a better repatriation strategy.
39
Problems of Global Managers:
As the global managers work in a dynamic environment, they are very vulnerable to meet
new challenges and hindrance. Estimates of expatriate failure rate run between 20 percent
and 50 percent, and the average cost per failure to the parent company ranges from $55,000
to $150,000. Studies claiming the failure rate are between 30 and 70 percent, which results
because of the problems faced by the global managers. Some of the major problems are
sorted out in below:
1. Lack of cultural knowledge: different people of different areas are used to their own
cultural practices. It is hard for a global manager to have knowledge on the different
cultures around the world.
3. Lack of understanding: The global managers always find themselves in continuous new
challenges. Some of which are out of their general understanding.
40
2. Awareness and Appreciation: To instill in new global managers awareness and
appreciation for the vast differences among the cultures in which they do business.
3. Tools and Support: To give global managers the tools and support they need to
succeed by the companies.
Conclusion:
Competency in business leadership, functional leadership, team leadership and personal
leadership are all key elements of a successful business leader's skill set. The requirement
for well-developed competencies in team leadership and personal leadership, however, is
particularly important in the international context.
Too few organizations really provide their executives with the right framework to assess
their individual abilities or have adequate mechanisms to provide frank and honest
feedback and developmental support. That is why Egon Zehnder International has
developed its Management Appraisal practice. The focus of this practice is the individual
assessment of executives based on a structured interview and exhaustive 360 degree
references. The output, which involves detailed personal feedback, is focused on
identifying developmental opportunities based on each executive's personal career
aspirations and the needs of the organization.5
41
program. There are many developmental options but, self-awareness, through structured
and regular feedback, and proactive career planning, are the first steps.
42
Q-7 a) what are the Leadership Skills for global managers?
2
The Focus Online interview with Cor Boonstra of Royal Philips Electronics, "If I had to
do it again I would be more aggressive"
3
The Focus Online article "The power of diversity" by Fritz Frohlich of Akzo Nobel.
4
The Focus Online article; Emotional intelligence in mergers and acquisitions by Daniel
Goleman.
5
The Focus Online article; The value of impartial views by Dr Hansjorg Franzius of
Siemens AG.
6
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_role_of_global
7
Aycan, Z. 2001. Expatriation: A critical step toward developing global leaders.
InDeveloping Global Business Leaders: Policies, Processes, and Innovations, eds M.
Mendenhall, T.M.Kuhlmann and G.K. Stahl, 119-135.London: Greenwood Publishing
Group.
43
8
Barnevik, P. 2001. Preface. In Harvard Business Review Global Strategies: Insights from
the world’s leading thinkers, eds P. Barnevik and R.M. Kanter. Boston: Harvard Business
School Publishing.
9
Bartlett, C., and S. Ghoshal. 1994. What is a global manager? In Harvard Business
Review Global Strategies: Insights from the world’s leading thinkers, eds P. Barnevik and
R.M. Kanter, 77-91. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
10
Khan, A. 2007. Global management skills.
MCQ Test:
1. _____ firms favor less-risky and higher control modes such as exporting and sales
subsidiaries
a) Polycentric
b) Regiocentric
c) Geocentric
d) Ethnocentric
3. There are ____ distinct attitude clusters that are useful in thinking about, and
charactering, corporate worldviews or mind-sets
a) 3
b) 4
c) 5
d) 6
44
4. The increase in specialization of people and differentiation in organizations was
driven by-
a) Technological improvement
b) Fragmentation of markets
c) Explosions in product variations
d) All of the above
45
9. (strategist + architect + coordinator) stand for –
a) Functional manager
b) Business manager
c) Country manager
d) Corporate manager
11. “there is no such thing as a universal global manager” was provided by—
a) David Whitwam
b) Christopher A. Barlett
c) Cynthia cahrchwell
d) Kedia and Mukherjee
46
14. There are ____ groups of competencies of a global manager.
a) 3
b) 4
c) 5
d) 6
15. Which one of the following is not under the knowledge competencies of a global
manager?
a) Technology savvy
b) Global risk management
c) Acculturation
d) Business and industry savvy
16. It’s necessary for global managers to develop good relations with____ who will
impact the business positively.
a) Influential people
b) Influential and effective people
c) Effective people
d) None of the above
47
19. While managing international assignments the emphasis shouldn’t be on
a) Selection
b) Training
c) Firing
d) Repatriation
20. Which one of the elements of emotional intelligence doesn’t involve personal
element?
a) Self-awareness
b) Motivation
c) empathy
d) self-regulation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
D B B D A D B D B B
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
B D D A C B B D C C
48
49