Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

C 223/40 EN Official Journal of the European Union 30.8.

2008

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

Order of the Court of First Instance of 26 June 2008 — Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 July 2008 —
Gibtelecom v Commission Espinosa Labella and Others v Commission

(Joined Cases T-433/03, T-434/03, T-367/04 and


T-244/05) (1) (Case T-322/06) (1)

(Competition — Telecommunications — Decisions not to take


any further action on complaints based on Article 86 EC — (Action for annulment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conserva-
Failure of the Commission to define a position on complaints tion of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora —
based on Article 86 EC — Actions for annulment — Actions Decision 2006/613/EC — List of sites of Community impor-
for failure to act — Action which becomes devoid of purpose tance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region —
in the course of proceedings — No need to adjudicate) Challengeable act — Lack of direct effect — Inadmissible)

(2008/C 223/67)
(2008/C 223/68)
Language of the case: English

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Gibtelecom Ltd (Gibraltar) (represented by: M. Llamas,


barrister, and B. O'Connor, solicitor)
Parties
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and A. Whelan, and subse-
quently by F. Castillo de la Torre, Agents)
Applicants: Manuel José Espinosa Labella (Almería, Spain); Josefa
Labella Dávalos (Almería); María Pilar Espinosa Labella
(Almería); María José Espinosa Labella (Almería); Tomasa
Re: Peñuela Ortiz (Almería); Tomás Espinosa Peñuela (Almería);
Francisco José Espinosa Peñuela (Mairena del Aljarafe, Spain);
Actions for (i) annulment of the alleged decisions of the Juan Manuel Espinosa Peñuela (Madrid, Espagne); María Lourdes
Commission of 17 October 2003, 5 July 2004 and 26 April Espinosa Peñuela (Almería); Adela Espinosa Peñuela (Almería);
2005 not to take any further action in respect of two Jorge Jesús Espinosa Peñuela (Almería) and the heirs of de Rafael
complaints calling on the Commission to act, on the basis of Espinosa Peñuela (Almería) (represented by: M.J. Rovira Daudí,
Article 86(3) EC, to put an end to infringements of Community lawyer)
law allegedly committed by the Kingdom of Spain, and (ii) a
declaration under Article 232 EC that, by failing to define a
position on the further action which it proposed to take with Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
respect to certain aspects of one of those complaints, the sented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and D. Recchia, Agents)
Commission failed to fulfil its obligations under Community
law.
Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (repre-
sented by: F. Díez Moreno, abogado del Estado)
Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the actions;

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the Kingdom of Spain's applica- Re:


tion to intervene in Case T-367/04;

3. Gibtelecom Ltd and the Commission shall each bear their own Partial annulment of Commission Decision 2006/613/EC of
costs. 19 July 2006 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive
92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the
Mediterranean biogeographical region (OJ 2006 L 259, p. 1), in
(1) OJ C 59, 6.3.2004. so far as it declares the site designated as ‘Artos de El Ejido’,
which includes lands belonging to the applicants, to be a site of
Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical
region.