20200115-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

ISSUE – Re FREEDOM OF SPEECH and Nazi flag

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.

* Gerrit, I understand you are of Jewish blood and so what about the Nazi flag that was displayed
at Beulah? Have you ever been in that town?
**#** INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, actually I would never forget this town as in 2000 I was
driving from Rainbow to Berriwillock when suddenly I crossed this road at full speed not having
realized there was a major highway crossing. I drove there in November 2019 and did think back
about that incident. So let us concentrate upon the so called Aboriginal flag..
* I was referring to the Nazi flag.
**#** As I was mentioning let us consider the so called Aboriginal flag. Prior to someone
creating this flag no such flag existed regarding Aboriginals for so far I am aware off.
Aboriginals claim it is their flag, to the exclusion of non-Aboriginals. So that could be deemed to
violate anti vilification laws. Actually while the version of that flag has been used at official
State and Federal events the designer sold it to a private company who now holds the rights. As
such it is a privately owned flag that I view has no more or less value then the so called Nazi
Flag. https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/nazi-flag-furore-prompts-move-to-tighten-anti-
vilification-laws/ar-BBYVkoZ?ocid=spartandhp
Nazi flag furore prompts move to tighten anti-vilification laws
* But you lost many Jewish relatives during WWII, is then the flag not upsetting you?
**#** Not at all. There is this dispute about the Confederates flag in the USA. There is a dispute
about the Orange triangular flag of The Netherlands. There is an argument about using black
Peters with St Nicholas festivities. And well today’s society might claim that anything in history
could be banned. After all the Vikings were also known for their brutality, is that meaning we
empty out museums and not honour anything about them? Then what about banning footy as
they use animal parts to start this kind of game in the 1800’s? Why not ban fishery altogether for
cruelty to animals. Why not ban those windmills that are used to generate electricity considering
the many birds that are killed being hit by their wings. And well we could go on and on. Then
again we could be realistic and accept that WE, the People, live under a Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) that actually was designed to prevent this abuse of powers
by any Parliament. Unconstitutionally mass murdering innocent people in Iraq for alleged
WMD’s and covering up a planned mass murder of MH17 travelers and crew somehow is not
worthy to be pursued because it doesn’t suit the political agenda of certain politicians. But having
someone flying some flag which some people may object against somehow is more important to
address then mass murders. Come on what an utter and sheer nonsense.

* Are you supporting for them to fly the Nazi flag?

**#** That is not the point. They as like Aboriginals are flying their choice of flag and if it is
within the powers of any legislature to ban one flag then why not the other? Perhaps if I fly a flag
p1 15-1-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
which displays a kangaroo then it be argued I imply animal cruelty? Come on lets be realistic.
Ample of people fly pirate flags or just display a skull on a flag, clothing or say as an ashtray
and why ban one item for being a flag but not the other? But there is more to it. Our federal
constitution provides for:
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious liberty-the
liberty and the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably aspire. A charter of
liberty is enshrined in this Constitution, which is also a charter of peace-of peace, order, and good
government for the whole of the peoples whom it will embrace and unite.
END QUOTE

And

HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE

Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in this Convention are about to commit to the
people of Australia a new charter of union and liberty; we are about to commit this new Magna Charta
for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole
history of the peoples of the world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of
Australia to vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This new
charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves.

END QUOTE

And, like it or not this means that racial/religious vilification against any person to deny the
person to use FREEDOM OF SPEECH as to fly a flag or whatever itself is unconstitutional. As
such any laws that interferes with the persons right to fly a flag of his/her choice could be
deemed unconstitutional. We inherited the FREEDOM OF SPEECH from the USA constitution
and its 14 Amendments. When I do my research on certain subjects I come across mountains of
anti Jewish propaganda and well I view that to obtain a balanced view of matters I have to read
and consider whatever they write regardless if I agree or disagree with any of the writings. Many
may find the flying of the so called Aboriginal flag from government building offensive. To my
understanding the designer actually created it not just for Aboriginals but also for environment
issues. As such it never was strictly a so called Aboriginal flag. In my view it never should be
used on government buildings as it is a privately owned flag. I understand the company that
purchased it is charging people at times for using it.
* So, you are not disturbed by the flying of the Nazi flag at all?
**#** To me the constitution dictates FREEDOM OF SPEECH, freedom of religion, political
liberty, etc, and if I desire to have my rights then I equally must accept the rights of others within
constitutional context. As such, I view that neither the State and/or the Commonwealth has any
legal powers to deny the person wanting to fly a Nazi flag within the confines of their property.
The centre displayed symbol on this so called Nazi flag actually as I understand it was based
upon the so called good omen that has been around for thousands of years. Are we to ban a
symbol because someone may have used/misused it long ago?
*.Surely WWII was not that long ago!
**#** So, what about people using around the world knives to attack and even kill others. Are
we going to ban any image of a knife because of the horror inflicted to so many? Are we to ban
the usage of pens, pencils and paper because often it was misused and criminals used it to record
p2 15-1-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
their heinous crimes they committed? Where do you stop? Are we going to ban Orange colour
because it may remind some people of the horrors and torture in Abu Ghraib prison?
* . It seem to me that you make clear there is a constitution and regardless if one may or may not
agree with something as long as it is within constitutional rights we just have to leave it alone!
**#** That is correct. We can have people who might get upset about whatever and we simply
cannot rob people of their constitutional rights merely because we may dispute this but insist we
are entitled to our own constitutional rights regardless if others may dislike us exercising this.
Without conceding the legislative powers of the Commonwealth and/ or the States I would give
the message that if you ban one privately owned flag then ban all. As such never again the
display of the so called Aboriginal flag either. Even to many Aboriginals this purported
Aboriginal flag may be oppressive as they may hold to be forced to accept some privately
designed flag as if it represents to them when it never was at all. For Iraqi’s and others the
Australian flag represents the mass murder of Iraqi’s, etc, and so why not ban this flag also? Not
just on flags but not use the symbol anywhere, so not even on souvenirs, cups, etc. Remember
the High Court of Australia struck down legislation against the communist? And constitutionally
I view the court was correct. It doesn’t mean that I sympathies with communism, as I am merely
expressing what my views are about constitutional rights.
We have to be more considerate to the rights of others. I have actually served in NATO in
Germany’s IRON CURTAIN and prior to that lived in Germany for about a year. My eldest
sister provided me with a list of Jewish family members who died in concentration camps, but I
accept that this was eventuating in a time of war, and being open minded learned also about the
hardship many Germans suffered. I am also descendant of a Portuguese merchant and well is that
meaning that South Americans who may have suffered hundreds of years ago under Portuguese
rule might now find my person offensive? To me history is what it is and we cannot change it.
We only can learn from errors made in the past but we will not by banning certain items. Take
the French invading The Netherlands and so the Spanish, are we then to ban their flags also?
What about the Japanese flag? Surely we are not going to ban all kinds of symbols merely
because someone might claim to be offended by seeing it? Some claim to be abducted by aliens
and so any image of an alleged alien upsets them, are we then going to ban those images? Some
people have been harmed by falling tree branches are we to then ban all trees? Some have been
harmed by lightening and have real fear about it, but try to ban lightening to occur! How many
persons in Beulah really were subjected to any Nazism? How many travelers through that small
country town really suffered under Nazism? So, what we have is that we are to deny people their
religious/political rights merely because of what other may imagine.
*.How can this relate to “religious” rights I wonder.
**#** Section 116 is really drawn from the USA Constitution and its 14 Amendments (as they
existed at the time of Federation). It is not for anyone to determine what is a religion. An Atheist
can have his religious views not to belief in some alleged super human being. If a person is proud
upon being a descendant of Germans then they are entitled to be so. You can be proud being an
Australian and may desire to fly the Australian flag but you may totally oppose the
unconstitutional murderous invasion into Iraq. As such, flying the Australian flag is not to be
deemed to approve of any murderous conduct. Likewise flying a flag associate with Nazi
Germany doesn’t mean the person doing so endorses any wrongdoing. My family shield is a
more than 1,000 year old guardian angel image, which later the Catholic Church used as the
religious symbol St Michael the Guardian Angel. It doesn’t mean that for me using this
traditional family shield then somehow is promoting Catholic doctrines. We have world wide
“climate change” cults/religious obsession groups who are in real terms in my view responsible
for the failure to keep fire reduction where needed. Oh, they claim to protect harm being done to
animals who might get harmed with such clean up. Well, with bush fires a lot more animals are
p3 15-1-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
being killed in the process and so let stop that nonsense. They are entitled to their kind of
“climate change’ religious concepts but it is another thing to force it upon others against their
desire.
Much is argued about what the so called White people did against Aboriginals but As I wrote
about I am not aware anyone considers comparing the past mass killings of Aboriginals as
bush fire victims versus today’s society seeking to prevent such mass deaths. It is not the
Prime Minister but the premiers who should shoulder blame for failure of proper fire
prevention.
This document can be downloaded from:
https://www.scribd.com/document/441746666/20200105-PRESS-RELEASE-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-
ISSUE-Re-Unreported-Mass-Killings-of-Aboriginals-Due-to-Bushfires
20200105-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE –
Re unreported mass killings of Aboriginals due to bushfires

Yes, Aboriginals used to practice bushfires for regeneration and never mind those Aboriginals
who were caught up in those bush fires as then no fire bridge existed or other kind of assistance.
Therefore if we desire to ban whatever we always might get some crazy excuse. To make it
unlawful to display a certain symbol merely because someone might feel discomfort not because
they experienced any harm but were brainwashed to believe whatever to me is utter and sheer
nonsense. Despite many of my Jewish family members having died in concentration camps I am
glad I maintained to be open minded. Having lived in Germany and spoken with former German
soldiers about the good and bad of WWII I at least have no adverse feelings regarding Germans.
*.What about those who had symbols tattooed on their bodies?
**#** A very good point. Some have in my view terrible symbols all over their bodies but I
accept that it is their rights regardless I may not appreciate it. If a person was to tattoo a Nazi flag
on his/her body then that is that person’s right to do so. In my view neither the State of the
Federal Parliament can legislate against this. Here we have this homosexual rainbow symbol and
even Government departments promoting it this even so many persons are deeply offended by
this. As such the so called Anti-vilification laws are merely used to suit oppressors to
indoctrinate and demand that the general community must not only accept but promote their
lucidities and those opposing it are branded to have vilified someone somehow. Well, we got
DOUBLE STANDARDS and it is time that in a DEMOCRACY the majority rules. The so
called Anti-vilification laws are violating the legal principles embedded in the constitution and
the States created within s106 “subject to this constitution” should accept this.
*.What about someone promoting to kill, someone who is not of a particular religion?
**#** That I view falls under criminal law. Merely because someone expressed some alleged
religious doctrine doesn’t mean that this somehow is a constitutional right to promote this, as to
kill another person clearly denies that person of constitutional rights to live in peace within a
community and as such that is a criminal issue not protected by religious freedoms. Indeed any
religious practice can be deemed criminal if it is to deny another human being certain rights.
Hansard 7-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE

Sir EDWARD BRADDON (Tasmania).-I have an amendment to move on behalf of Tasmania, and also an
amendment of my own. The clause we have before us says that a state shall not make any law prohibiting the
free exercise of any religion. It is quite possible that this might make lawfull practices which would otherwise
be strictly prohibited. Take, for instance, the Hindoos. One of their religious rites is the "suttee," and
another is the "churruck,"-one meaning simply murder, and the other barbarous cruelty, to the
devotees who offer themselves for the sacrifice.

Dr. COCKBURN.-The Thugs are a religious sect.

p4 15-1-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 Sir EDWARD BRADDON.-Yes. If this is to be the law, these people will be able to practise the rites
of their religion, and the amendment I have to suggest is the insertion of some such words as these:-

But shall prevent the performance of any such religious rites, as are of a cruel or demoralizing
character or contrary to the law of the Commonwealth.

END QUOTE

Flying a certain flag cannot be demoralizing merely because someone might assume this is
because of whatever was written somewhere.
Take for example how we had President Saddam Hussein blamed for having WMD (Weapons of
Mass Destruction) with a murderous invasion killing many innocent Iraqi’s when in the end there
never were any WMD’s. The same with Syria about the alleged gas attacks by the Syrian army
upon its own people. Later it was exposed that the OPCW report was doctored, as there really
was no evidence at all to prove such gas attack. Because many of my Jewish family members
died in concentration camps I have been seeking to establish the truth about gas chambers and
watched numerous video’s etc, and quite frankly I have not come across any evidence proving
that such gas chambers actually existed and used as has been claimed. As such a lot of
propaganda really was FAKE NEWS propaganda specifically created to pretend some situation
having existed. Never mind the allied forces after WWII deliberately causing the dead of more
than a million German soldiers by starvation. So are we to ban the American flag also? No one in
his/her right mind will hold that a war is in the best interest of the general population and so
every war has its horrific incidents. Vietnam is a clear example with the napalm bombs and
Agent Orange. Are we now going to ban the American and Australian flags for its participation
in that war? After all is it to glorify the atrocities that were inflicted upon others with flying the
flag or showing it on a vehicle or elsewhere?
*.Gee, you really make your points.
**#** If I were to drive through Beulah and this flag were to be flying I might be curious as to
discover what their intend and meaning was but I could not consider it to be an offence. I used to
have a Dutch flag at the real of my car. Many Indonesians might hold such flag to be a flag of an
oppressor and consider it offensive. It that meaning that we are going to ban all Dutch symbols,
including car stickers? Why just only flags that are flying? While some politicians will seek to
make political mileage out of the Nazi flag issue I view that we better respect the rights of the
person why did raise this Nazi flag. Perhaps we should have the Government spending more time
about the unattended fire dangers that has been going on for at least 7 years , which I continually
reported, but they couldn’t bother about. To me that is far more critical issue as we likely have
bushfires started not because of nature, not because of some fire bugs but because of complete
neglect to do proper fire prevention. Here we have people dying because of bushfires and we
have a minister more concerned about some flag then to avoid the loss of lives and destruction of
property. Just check out: After Daniel Andrews spend so much time and monies to revamp
the fire brigade we end up with more of the same. And we find people losing their homes
and lives in the meantime. This document can be downloaded from:
https://www.scribd.com/document/434950936/20191114-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-
Mayor-Buloke-Shire-Council-Cr-Carolyn-Stewart-Ors
We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)
p5 15-1-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati