Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
organizations are:
Purposeful Collaboration:
The Essential Components
of Collaborative Cultures
©2017 by Institute for Corporate Productivity (i4cp). All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any
means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without
the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied
in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For
permission requests, write to i4cp.com/contact.
i4cp RESEARCH
Chief Research and Marketing Officer: Kevin Martin
Futurist and Co-Founder: Jay Jamrog
Senior Researcher: Joe Jamrog
• More than 1,100 organizations took part in this research study; two-thirds of which include collaboration as a stated
organizational value. This brief also includes case examples of four companies that exemplify high-performance
organizations: Booz Allen Hamilton, Edwards Lifesciences, Owens Corning, and Patagonia.
• This is the first in a series of briefs that focus on how to create an organizational ethos that allows healthy and
productive collaboration to thrive. It introduces the concept of purposeful collaboration and offers examples of
these foundational elements in practice. Subsequent briefs will go deeper into the alignment of collaboration with
leadership, workplace, and talent practices, including how to avoid collaboration overload.
• Every finding included in these research briefs has a high positive correlation to i4cp’s Market Performance Index
and an extremely high correlation to i4cp’s Collaboration Effectiveness Index – see below for details on both indexes.
High-performance organizations Low-performance organizations Organizations indicating high/very high extent with 1,000+ employees. Source: i4cp
Definitions:
Next Practice: Approaches correlated to positive market performance practiced by a relatively small cohort of top-
performing organizations that other organizations should consider implementing.
Market Performance Index (MPI): This index defines high-performance organizations based on their self-
reported multi-year performance in profitability, revenue, customer satisfaction, and market share.
Foreword
Rob Cross on
Organizational Culture
and Effective Collaboration
When it comes to culture, I have seen three archetypes in my work on
collaborative networks.
Rob Cross
Edward A. Madden
Professor of Global Business, First is an overly participative culture;
Babson College
one of over-consensus where connectivity is through the
roof because everyone believes they need to be consulted
on decisions. That sort of culture doesn’t work. It overwhelms
organizations, placing too much focus on consensus building.
The inevitable result is collaborative overload.
The second archetype is the hierarchical culture. There, the focus is skewed
toward leaders. Organizations may have created open spaces to encourage connection,
or actively promoted the idea of collaboration. However, almost every interaction comes
back to the leaders. In our work, we’ve seen this implicit and embedded in hierarchical
networks. Because of this structure, collaborations in those organizations just don’t
produce the desired results.
The third archetypical culture is one of fear. We have mapped the idea
of fear in collaborative networks for some time. What we find is that people
!!!
hold back ideas because they are intimidated by others. In those fear-driven
networks, collaboration can’t reach its full potential because individuals don’t
feel they can fully and safely contribute all that they might otherwise offer.
These three archetypes offer illustrations that confirm cultures and networks are intimately intertwined.
Culture defines who interacts with whom and how, and is reinforced by the networks that are in place. In
cultures that maximize collaboration and performance, energy is high and a sense of purpose is pervasive.
People tend to think that work itself is the basis of purpose, but it isn’t. We’ve found that both energy and
purpose are built on network interactions. The people you interact with give you a sense of impact, that what
you do matters. In turn, that effective interaction gives you a sense of energy and purpose in your work.
Ultimately, it keeps drives engagement, lowers turnover, and reduces talent risk.
Purposeful Collaboration:
The Essential Components of Collaborative Cultures
High-performance organizations are abuzz with collaboration, and for good reason: Collaboration is highly correlated with
market performance (this includes market share, revenue growth, profitability, and customer satisfaction).
The findings of i4cp’s new research on collaboration are clear and show that the difference between productive and
unproductive collaboration can be summed up in one word: purpose.
This brief highlights how purposeful collaboration leads to healthy and productive collaboration. Our research found that
organizations that have cultures that enable and support purposeful collaboration do so via the alignment of three key
elements—all of which are clearly linked to higher market performance—and work in unison to shape and move the culture:
leadership, work management, and talent practices.
CULTURE
Continuous
The environment Ability to freely
Collaboration is reinforcement
makes it safe to connect with others
viewed as vital to that collaboration
openly communicate and share/find
driving business is a valuable part
and report when relevant information
results. of how work
problems arise. across the enterprise.
gets done.
The purposeful pursuit of collaboration is the primary People (leaders and individual
reason high-performance organizations (HPOs) such as contributors) view collaboration
Patagonia are 1.5x more likely than low-performance as a valuable facet of work
organizations (LPOs) to leverage collaboration to achieve
desired business outcomes. A critical and foundational
HIGH-PERFORMANCE ORGANIZATIONS ARE
element to this equation is how high-performance
MORE LIKELY TO BASE COLLABORATION
organizations are more than 2x more likely to base their DECISIONS ON THE FOLLOWING:
collaborations on specific business needs or goals. Driving desired business outcomes
Organizations indicating high/very high extent with 1,000+ employees. Source: i4cp
2x MORE HIGH-PERFORMANCE
ORGANIZATIONS REPORT A CULTURE To help ensure this clarity, nearly eight in 10 of these
THAT SUPPORTS COLLABORATION high-performers make a practice of clearly defining
People understand the importance of and reinforcing the importance of collaboration in
collaboration in achieving business goals
development programs. As simple as this practice may
High-performance
organizations 49% seem, it’s utilized by nearly 2x more high-performers
Low-performance
organizations 26% 2x than low-performers and is the topic related to
People view collaboration as a collaboration training that has the highest correlation to
valuable facet of their work
market performance and also has the strongest negative
High-performance
organizations 49% correlation to market performance if it is not addressed
Low-performance
organizations 24% 2x in these trainings.
leaders at more than one-half of high-performance in organizations comprised of highly complex systems
organizations purposefully select collaborative group (e.g., operating units in multiple countries, distinct
members based on the expertise of the individuals businesses with similar customer groups or suppliers)
or relevancy to the project at-hand rather than their where personal connections and/or information
relationship with the person (53% vs. 35%). exchange are essential.
and marketer of insulation, leaders. This research study has also revealed that
roofing, and fiberglass personal networks that are too narrowly focused (e.g.,
composites. Says Linda confined to peers at the same level, or are limited to a
Quarles, the company’s business unit or function) can negatively impact market
1.5x
our annual leadership conference, we bring together
teams to work on some of our largest enterprise-wide MORE THAN MORE LIKELY
challenges. And we deliberately assemble those teams to TO ENSURE EMPLOYEES COLLABORATE
be collaborative, cross functional, and cross-business.” EFFECTIVELY WITH INTERNAL
STAKEHOLDERS AND
2.5x
The Network Effect (E.G., BUSINESS FUNCTIONS
OR BUSINESS UNITS)
High-performance organizations are 1.5x more likely
than low-performers to strongly encourage collaboration
MORE LIKELY TO ENSURE
THIS CAPABILITY IN THEIR
across all employee and leadership levels, and they do
LEADERS’ INTERACTIONS WITH KEY
so in part to breakdown information silos and/or to help
EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER GROUPS
individuals build more effective personal networks across (E.G., CUSTOMERS, VENDORS, ASSOCIATIONS, ETC.).
HIGH-PERFORMANCE ORGANIZATIONS
ARE 2.5x MORE LIKELY TO PROVIDE
ENVIRONMENTS IN WHICH EMPLOYEES
FEEL SAFE TO COMMUNICATE
High-performance
organizations 41%
Low-performance
organizations 16% 2.5X
Organizations indicating high/very high extent with 1,000+ employees. Source: i4cp
“My vision for Edwards includes
a culture that actively and
Without a spirit of openness and collaboration,
companies such as Edwards Lifesciences might not
consistently values diversity,
be the innovative leaders they are today. The medical and encourages diverse
equipment company, which developed the first artificial perspectives as well as
heart valve and was founded on a collaboration between
a retired aerospace engineer and a surgeon, encourages
new ways of thinking and
employees to speak out when concerns arise and behaving. ”
embraces the idea that open debate leads to innovation, Mike Mussallem
says Christine McCauley, corporate vice president of CEO, Edwards Lifesciences
Human Resources.
“Getting very diverse perspectives at the table to really “People have to be able to
wrestle down an issue enables us to get the best of all speak up about issues without
sides,” she says. “By having too much of one mindset any fear of retaliation or
”
we miss the opportunity for true innovation and
implications for their career.
breakthrough thinking.” An essential ingredient, says
Christine McCauley
McCauley, is that “People have to be able to speak
Corporate Vice President of Human Resources,
up about issues without any fear of retaliation or Edwards Lifesciences
Awareness of collaborative overload as a major business problem is relatively new, but thanks to the work of Professor Rob
Cross, this issue has been forced into the spotlight. Currently, one-third of high-performance organizations and fully one-half
of low-performance organizations indicate they take no action at all to identify where this problem exists or may be building.
Among those that do take action, about one-half (51%) identify overload via the
CURRENTLY observation of leaders (e.g., making note of a team member who is increasingly late for
/
1 3 OF meetings, someone who is routinely sought out by colleagues for assistance and has
a hard time declining, or noticing decreases in an individual’s performance). A lesser-
HIGH-PERFORMANCE utilized mechanism with slightly higher correlation to market performance is data from
ORGANIZATIONS employee engagement surveys.
AND
LOW-PERFORMANCE
12
OF / New ways to address such challenges are being explored at global management and
technology consultancy Booz Allen Hamilton, says Aimee George Leary, senior vice
president, Talent Management. “Historically, to identify issues, we have done our people
ORGANIZATIONS
TAKE NO ACTION TO survey, which was more of a climate or engagement assessment. But we’re shifting
IDENTIFY OR MANAGE gears to focus on culture and the behaviors within a culture that enable collaboration
COLLABORATION and innovation. We want to ensure that the behaviors in our organization support
OVERLOAD our values, our purpose, and exemplify the attributes found in collaborative and
constructive environments.”
Patagonia uses surveys to provide employees with a way to communicate issues and problems with the collaborative
process. Dean Carter says the company has worked to refine the survey process to gain greater insight into these challenges.
“There’s a pendulum effect with collaboration. It can swing from too much collaboration that can cause work to stall, to the
other extreme of not enough collaboration, which can affect the quality of decisions.”
Carter and his team redesigned survey response options so employees can more accurately pinpoint the effectiveness
of collaboration along a continuum. “We found we needed a scale that reflected that pendulum idea to enable us to
for your organization. ” i4cp’s research has revealed several Next Practices that
Dean Carter organizations should consider now to ensure people or roles
Vice President Human Resources and Shared Services, Patagonia
don’t become so burdened with collaborative demands they are
not able to make positive contributions to the business.
NEXT PRACTICES
Providing an environment in which individuals feel Encouraging individuals to report their own
they can safely report being at risk of overload from collaboration problems to their leader/manager
too many collaborative requests
34%
High-performance
organizations
29%
3x
High-performance
10%
organizations Low-performance
4x
organizations
6%
Low-performance
organizations Organizations indicating high/very high extent with 1,000+ employees.
Source: i4cp
3x
our operating model is all about, and it’s done through
10%
Low-performance
organizations
networking and collaboration inside our organization.”
Performance goals for leaders at all levels include
demonstration of effective collaborative behaviors But reinforcing this requires a multi-prong approach.
40%
High-performance
organizations “There is no single silver bullet. We have used multiple
Low-performance
organizations 10% 4x channels to work on this. We’ve dedicated spaces, we’ve
Performance goals for teams reinforce held events to bring people together. We’ve created
importance of collaboration people programs, like training. We have implemented
33%
High-performance
organizations tools and technologies to support collaboration,
Low-performance
organizations 6% 5.5x and we’ve established and highlighted incentives for
Practices at Booz Allen Hamilton that enable such work on solving the problem. As an added incentive,
productive collaboration to thrive include: participants are provided time and dollars to
participate. Note that providing workspaces designed
• Offering development and training programs that
to support collaboration is a practice in place at
teach people how to collaborate effectively—56% of
high-performance organizations provide training/
2.5x more high-performance organizations than
low-performance organizations, and has a positive
development on collaboration. Our research shows
correlation to market performance.
that this practice has the greatest impact on market
performance when targeted to those in entry-level • Reinforcing collaboration as an expected part of each
positions. employee’s daily work, as part of their performance
review and recognizing excellence—Booz Allen
• Hosting events and coaching on how to pitch ideas, and
Hamilton has created an annual award to recognize
how to share and collaborate to build new solutions.
employees for collaborating, solving problems, and
• Establishing solver spaces where people present a driving service outcomes through working collectively
challenge and the company brings a group together to across the organization.
The key insight from this study is that productive collaboration requires purposeful collaboration. High-
performance organizations focus their collaborative energies where it pays off for the business, and
promote practices for which the purpose of collaboration is clear and reflected in the culture.
• Take strategic pauses to analyze and identify the best-fit opportunities that connect the current
business strategies to where higher levels of collaboration unlock value and significantly
contribute to success.
• Rebalance collaboration resources and effort towards new and emerging business needs
and away from legacy collaborative investments and practices that are less relevant and
unnecessarily burden employees.
• D
esignate a point-person to lead and monitor the purposeful collaborative building and
adjustment work. The accountable leader or business function should perform regular culture
assessments to identify both successes and roadblocks, and to implement adjustments to
culture elements as needed. Use i4cp’s Collaborative Culture Worksheet to structure your
assessment.
• I nclude collaboration as an expectation when describing your organization’s culture via your
website’s career pages and other recruitment channels. Screen for candidates who have
demonstrated effective collaborative behaviors.
• I nclude instruction in collaborative working behaviors to onboarding programs and use the
onboarding process to acquaint new hires to who does what in the organizations
• F or early-career and rising leaders, ensure that the importance and value of diverse
experiences, perspective, thoughts, and background is communicated and understood. It is
critical that leaders desire, cultivate, and know how to manage this type of diversity in order to
create and support an environment that encourages open communication and collaboration.
Ensure that each person in the organization understands the business mission, strategies, and
objectives. Link collaboration to business results through communication that reinforces the
connection and by establishing measures (quantifiable performance expectations). Provide rewards,
and track and incentivize outcomes produced by collaborative work.
Also, consider conducting an analysis of your company’s internal social network to identify
bottlenecks and other barriers to information flow as well as individuals who may be at risk of
overload from too many collaboration requests. And, make it safe for employees to report when
collaborations or collaboration requests are unproductive or becoming burdensome.
This is the first in a series of four i4cp publications on purposeful collaboration that will be followed by
explorations of the alignment of collaboration via three key elements (leadership, work management and
talent practices), as well as an instructional guide about how to avoid collaboration overload.
Acknowledgements
For generously sharing their time and experiences for our research into collaborative cultures, i4cp thanks the following:
References
Cross, R., Rebele, R. & Grant, A. (2016, January-February). Collaborative Overload. Harvard Business Review.
hbr.org
Institute for Corporate Productivity (2014). The Secret Formula for Organizational Agility. i4cp.com
Institute for Corporate Productivity (2014). Global Leadership Development: Preparing Leaders for
a Globalized Market. i4cp.com
About i4cp
i4cp is a human capital research firm that discovers the people practices that drive high
performance. Ranked among the fastest-growing companies on the Inc. 500|5000 list for four
consecutive years, i4cp provides its extensive member network of leading global employers and
government institutions with the research, peer collaboration, tools, and data essential to developing and executing
workforce strategies and practices that deliver higher market performance.
Find us on:
Learn more at i4cp.com