Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
81-86, 1995
Copyright 0 1995ElsevierScienceLtd
Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
095&4214,'95 $10.00 + 0.00
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kuwait University, PO Box 5969, 13060 Safat, Kuwait
In oil fields, separators are used to separate oil and gas contained in the crude oil pumped
from the wells before processing. Although there are many factors influencing the
performance of these separators, one of the crucial problems is the formation of foam due
to the impurities present in the crude. Another operating problem is carry-over, which occurs
when free liquid escapes with the gas phase. Of the several methods used to control foam,
chemical control by use of antifoam agents is very important. In this work, the main
objective is to study the poor separation of oil and gas due to foaming and the carry-over
problem in separators observed in one of the oil fields in Kuwait. Studies were also
conducted on the effect of a silicone antifoam agent used to control foaming in order to
increase the separation efficiency and thereby increase the production capacity.
Components affecting separation it may foam to such an extent that the crude oil cannot
be processed effectively without the aid of an antifoam’.
To have efficient and stable operation over a wide range
of conditions, a gas and liquid separator must have the
features described below1*2. Foam control
1. A primary separation section for removing the bulk One way of controlling foam is to prevent it from
of the liquid from the inlet stream containing liquid forming in the first place. This can either be
and gas, mainly by centrifugal force. It is essential accomplished by removing the foam stabilizing agent by
to remove slugs and large droplets of liquid from either changing or discontinuing the use of a problem
the gas stream to minimize gas turbulence and chemical. A simple filtration may selectively remove the
re-entrainment of liquid particles. This is usually problem chemical and reduce or eliminate the foaming
accomplished by a change in direction of fluid flow. problem. This approach is not always a possible
Centrifugal force from a tangential inlet on a vertical alternative.
vessel quickly removes large volumes of liquid and Surface whips, thermal shock and ultrasonic techni-
allows redistribution of gas velocity. Properly shaped ques are various mechanical devices that have been
and positioned deflection plates are usually used in proposed to control foam. New equipment such as a
horizontal and spherical vessels to accomplish this cyclone-style gas/oil separator may be used to minimize
effect with a minimum of re-entrainment. the amount of foam. Using the above methods, a
2. A secondary separation section for removing a reduction in foaming tendency is usually accomplished
maximum of smaller liquid droplets is enhanced by and the use of antifoam is still required.
gravity settling. The major separation principle in Chemical control of foam by the use of antifoams is
this section primarily depends on gas turbulence. The very important but is often not well understood.
turbulence factor is often minimized by a suitable Distinction is made between antifoams (chemicals added
inlet arrangement and properly designed and before the foam has formed to inhibit foam formation)
positioned baffles. and defoamers (chemicals added after foam has formed
3. In order to separate mist not settled out by to knock down the foam). An antifoam is usually a good
centrifugal force or gravity, a mist extractor is placed defoamer; it functions in the bulk of the liquid to control
in the way of the gas stream. The mist extractor may foam as the bubbles are nucleating, but will also act on
be of the vane or coalescing-pack type, or it might the bubble surface to destroy the foam. Many organic
be a hydrocyclone. The usual oil field separator materials are good defoamers but poor antifoams’.
employs the impingement principle as the primary Foam depressants will often increase the capacity of a
mechanism of mist extraction. The tiny liquid given separator. However, in sizing a separator to handle
droplets are collected on a surface, where they are a particular crude, use of an effective depressant should
drained away from the gas stream or form large not be assumed, because the crude and foam
droplets that can fall back into the primary characteristics may change during the life of any field.
separation section. Sufficient capacity should be provided in the separator
4. An oil collecting section for receiving and disposing to handle anticipated production without the use of a
of collected liquid. The liquid separated from the well foam depressant or inhibitor. Once in operation, use of
stream and condensed in the separator collects in the a foam depressant may allow more throughput than the
bottom part of the separator. This section should be designed capacity’.
arranged so that the separated liquid has a minimum
level of disturbance from the flowing gas stream. The
liquid level is maintained within given limits by a Discussion of poor separation and
carry-over problem
liquid level control device, to prevent gas from
entering the oil outlet and liquid from rising to the The carry-over problem has been observed in separators
elements in the separator, and to ensure sufficient due to foaming. Such foaming has resulted in the
retention time for the gas bubbles to break out of carry-over of crude into the gas stream and, in addition,
the liquid. the separators have to operate at their full design
capacity to meet the production target rate set for the
gathering centre. To reduce foaming and the carry-over
problem, the oil level in the separators is lowered and
Foaming problems the total span of the level controllers set at 10%. By
Foam can seriously impair the operation of petroleum doing this, the oil and gas separation becomes inefficient
processes, but it is not often recognized as the major in the first stage and causes slippage of gas to the second
cause of a particular problem. Many problems, such as stage, exceeding its design capacity and thus resulting in
reduced capacity of equipment, large overhead losses, poor performance. Furthermore, this operating condi-
overhead fouling or poor separation efficiency, may tion results in an increased amount of gas reaching the
occur because of foam. Foam occurs when a surfactant, high-pressure (HP) flare, as the low-pressure (LP) gas
which is either added intentionally or is naturally present compressor at the gas booster station is already
during a process, dissolves in a liquid. For example, crude operating at full design capacity and cannot process any
oil may not foam, but once a corrosion inhibitor is added additional LP gas. Moreover, the scrubbers in the LP
li-
CHEMICAL CHEhllCAL
TANK PUMP PRV
HP HEADER 1 ~‘1, ,,.n.,r ALAnM q AnHt HP GAS TO
BOOSTER STATION
FLOW LINES \I
(HP WELLS)
LPHEADER
I
1
Al ARM q ADDCL
v.-.....
CARRY
“,,I,,,L,
OVER
LP GAS TO
I BOOSTER STATION
LP
SEPARATOR
FLOW LINES
(LP WELLS )
CRUDE OIL
TANK
and HP gas systems at the gas booster station have to The second mechanical foam breaker is defoaming
be drained out many times a day due to the excessive plates, which extend from near the inlet to the outlet of
carry-over of crude oil in the gas stream. the separator. The plates that are immersed in the oil
assist in removing non-solution gas from the oil and in
breaking foam in the oil. The plates that are above the
Process description oil/gas interface in the gas section of the separator
remove oil mist from the gas and assist in breaking foam
The dry crude oil from the wells flows through valves
that may exist in the gas section of the vesse17.
and headers into separators and then to oil tanks, as
Excessive foaming was observed in day-to-day
shown in Figure 1. The separators and tanks degas the
operations and it became evident that this mechanical
crude oil. The separators in this particular oil field are
means of breaking down foam is not efficient and an
of a horizontal type and are equipped with foam breakers
alternative method is therefore required. Table 1 gives
to improve performance. The mechanical foam breakers
the design specifications of the HP and LP separators.
are divided into two parts (see Figure 2). First, the inlet
performs degassing by gently agitating the feed fluid. This
will assist in removing gas from the oil and breaking Chemical control of foaming
foam bubbles as they flow through the inlet element.
Silicone fluids have been used for many years to suppress
foaming of crude in separators and to prevent carry-over
of liquid with the gas. To increase the capacity, a silicone
2 /4
antifoam injection was introduced into the separators in
the unit under study. A silicone injection installation
provided on site was connected to the HP separator inlet
to ensure that the chemical was adequately mixed, as
1 6
Description HP LP I
(1) Well fluid inlet Dimensions (internal diameter) (m) 2.5 2.5
(2) Inlet degassing element
Dimensions (length) (m) 13 13
(3) Defoaming plates
(4) Gas outlet Flow rate (BPD) 50 000 50 000
(5) Oil outlet Pressure (psig) 470 85
(6) Oil level control Temperature (‘F) 190 180
Retention (min) 4.5 4.5
Figure 2 Horizontal separator
shown in Figure I. The antifoam is continuously injected Table 4 Oil flow rate through HP and LP separators with varying
into the feed and stays in the separated oil through the amounts of antifoam
HP
LP
0 IS 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40
Anli-foam injection ( GPO ) Anti-loam inisction (GPD)
Figure 3 Effect of antifoam injection on foam Figure 5 Effect of antifoam on gas production
Above this level, excessive carry-over occurs due to remarkably, reducing wastage, and the available LP gas
foaming. After silicone injection, the feed capacity could was processed at the LP compressor within the design
be increased to a maximum of 57 500 BPD and the limit. Efficient separation permitted processing of extra
separator level could be increased to 15% of the total crude. The processing capacity increased to 57 700 BPD
control span. using the silicone antifoam.
References
Conclusions Chilingarian, G.V., Robertson, J.O. and Kumar, S. Surface
operations in petroleum production, in Decelopmrnts in Petroleum
Science, Vol 19A, Elsevier, New York, USA (1987), Ch 3, 59-69
Even though various mechanical devices have been Szilas, A.P. Production and transport of oil and gas, in
proposed to control foam formation, which is one of Developments in Petroleum Science, Vol 18B, Part B (Gathering and
the most significant factors affecting oil and gas Transport), Elsevier, New York, USA (1986), 68-69
Amoid, K. and Stewart, M. Designing oil and gas production
separation efficiency, the chemical control of foam
systems: How to size and select two phase separators J World Oil
by the use of antifoam is very important. Using (NovjDec 1984)
silicone, the operating level increased to W 15% of Worely, MS. and Laurence, L.L. Oil and gas separation is a science
J Petrol Technol (April 1957)
the total span of the level controllers. Efficient oil/gas
Callaghan, I.C., Gould, C.M., Reid, A.J. and Seaton, H.D. Crude
separation was achieved with the antifoam injection set oil foaming problems at the Sullom Voe terminal J Petrol Technol
at optimum dosage; more HP gas was separ- (Dee 1985)
Engineering Data Book 10th Edn, Vol 1, Section 1. Gas Processors
ated/produced in the first stage separator and processed
Suppliers Association (1987)
at the HP compressor at the booster station. Bradely, H.B. Petroleum Engineering Hand Book, Richardson, USA,
Simultaneously, LP gas production was decreased Ch 12, I-40