Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
• Case Studies
• Summary
• Questions
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
3
Suction Lift – Negative Suction Head Flooded Suction – Positive Suction Head
• Energy dissipated due to friction and
turbulence during pump operation
• Minor Losses
• Due to turbulence at bends, fittings, valves, etc.
• Hf = K (V2/2G) (Headloss factor times velocity head)
• NPSHA = Atmos. Head + Static Suction Head – Suction HL
• Standard atmospheric pressure = 14.7 psi (34 ft. head)
• Power
• Rate of work done (ft-lb/s)
• Wastewater pumps most often
do work by using electric
motors
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
• Collect information
• Determine type of pump to be used
• Develop station layout
• Develop system curves
• Select pumps that match the system curves
• Write your specification
• Coordinate
• Finalize the design
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
13
Collect Information
• Site conditions
• Footprint and headroom constraints
• Subgrade conditions
• Elevation constraints
• Suction and discharge inverts
• Suction head available
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
More than one type may work - what’s best for the specific
application and owner preference?
Fairbanks-Morse
15
Types of Pumps Single suction
Double suction
Pump Types Radial Flow
Mixed Flow Self-priming
Centrifugal Non-self-priming
Kinetic Axial Flow
Open impeller
Peripheral/Regenerative Semi-open impeller
Closed impeller
Jet
Special Gas lift
Pumps Hydraulic ram
Electromagnetic
Piston
Reciprocating
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
Positive Plunger
Displacement Diaphragm
Vane Screw
Rotary Gear Piston
Lobe Hose
Hydraulic Institute
Types of Pumps
• Kinetic (Rotodynamic) Pumps
• Energy is imparted to the fluid by a rotating impeller which increases
the flow velocity and converts to a pressure increase upon exit.
• Can be safely operated under closed valve conditions (for short
periods of time).
• Three Types:
• Radial-flow pumps (Centrifugal Pump) - higher pressures and lower flow rates than
axial-flow pumps.
• Axial-flow pumps - lower pressures and higher flow rates than radial-flow pumps.
• Mixed-flow pumps – A compromise between radial and axial-flow pumps - operate at
higher pressures than axial-flow pumps while delivering higher discharges than radial-
flow pumps.
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
Configurations
• Horizontal motor
• Vertical motor
• Single or two stage
• Dual diesel / electric drive Horizontal Vertical
22
Vertical Turbine
Applications Characteristics
• Water treatment: • Wide flow range
• Raw water pumps • Wide head range – add
stages for higher head
• Groundwater pumps
(submersible) • Steep curve
• Membrane feed pump • Very compact footprint
• Filter backwash pump • Prone to vibration
• High service pumps • Difficult to service
• Transfer pumps
Vortex Impeller
Channel Impeller
Semi-Open Impeller
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
(recessed impeller)
(enclosed, 1-3 vanes)
Sewage lift station Grit and sludge pumping
typical application typical applications
• Rock subgrade
• Owner preference
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
• Ease of maintenance
Centrifugal Pump Summary
• Larger impellers - Greater flow and head
• Size motor HP for “run out” or maximum power NOT duty point
28
• Resources
• Hydraulic Institute (HI) Standards, other references
•
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
• Consider need for portable hoists or truck access, etc. when selecting
pump spacing, sizing hallways
• Long-radius bends and full-port valves are not considered flow disturbing
31
= ∑ hlf + hlm
Static Head
FLOW RATE, Q
33
300
Head (ft)
Total Kf*Q^1.85 Km*Q^2
Flow TDH NPSHa Friction Form
gpm ft ft Losses Losses 250
0 296.42 33.99 0.00 0.00
250 297.03 33.97 0.34 0.27
500 298.73 33.89 1.24 1.07 200
750 301.45 33.76 2.62 2.42 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
1000 305.17 33.58 4.46 4.30
1250 309.87 33.36 6.73 6.72
1500 315.53 33.08 9.44 9.67 Flow (gpm)
1750 322.13 32.76 12.55 13.17
System Head (single FM)
2000 329.68 32.39 16.07 17.20
34
4 Run-Out Point
BHP Curve
NPSHR Curve
FLOW RATE, Q
System Curve Envelope and Pump Curves
Pump Curves
System Curve 2
TOTAL HEAD, HT
System Curve 1
This pump
is not
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
pumping
One duty point does NOT define a pump curve.
A flat pump curve is very sensitive to system curve changes.
FLOW RATE, Q
System Curve Considerations
Pump Curves
Future System Curve
TOTAL HEAD, HT
FLOW RATE, Q
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
Pump Curve
37
“Droopy” Pump Curves
Normal pump curve compared to “droopy” curve.
Pump curves shall continuously rise to shut off.
System Curve
FLOW RATE, Q
Curves – Pumps in Parallel
System Curve
FLOW RATE, Q
Curves – Pumps in Series
Pump Curve for two equal
pump impellers in series
FLOW RATE, Q
Curves – Pumps with Variable Frequency
Drives (VFD)
System Curve 1
TOTAL HEAD, HT
System Curve 2
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
FLOW RATE, Q
42
1,000 507 75 950 458 900 411 850 366 806 329 750 285
900 520 73 855 469 810 421 765 376 725 338 675 293
800 532 70 760 480 720 431 680 384 645 346 600 299
700 542 66 665 489 630 439 595 392 564 352 525 305
600 552 62 570 498 540 447 510 399 484 359 450 311
500 560 56 475 505 450 454 425 405 403 364 375 315
400 567 49 380 512 360 459 340 410 322 368 300 319
300 572 40 285 516 270 463 255 413 242 372 225 322
200 577 30 190 521 180 467 170 417 161 375 150 325
100 582 18 95 525 90 471 85 420 81 378 75 327
0 587 - 0 530 0 475 0 424 0 381 0 330
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
TOTAL HEAD, HT
Pump Curve
70% of BEP
FLOW RATE, Q
BEP
Preferred Operating Range
POR
1
120% of BEP
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
TOTAL HEAD, HT
Pump Curve
50% of BEP
FLOW RATE, Q
BEP
Allowable Operating Range
AOR
1
125% of BEP
Operating Outside of POR/AOR
40
30 NPSHA/ NPSHR =
NPSH (ft. abs.)
36 / 22 = 1.6
20
10
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
Flow (gpm)
NPSHA NPSHR
49
Water Hammer
Δh
Case Study – Flow Equalization Basin
• Prestressed Concrete Ground Storage Tank
• Pumped Influent, Gravity Drain
• Varying Water Levels Pose Hydraulic Challenges
40’ to 45’
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
Case Study – Flow Equalization Basin
100.00
90.00
• Pumps off curve at full and
80.00 reduced speed when WSE is low.
70.00
60.00
50.00
TDH (Feet)
40.00
30.00
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Flow (MGD)
Case Study – Flow Equalization Basin
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
TDH (Feet)
40.00
30.00
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
20.00
• Addition of a standpipe
10.00 changes effective WSE seen
by pump
0.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Flow (MGD)
Case Study – DC Water Blue Plains FADF
FIP System
• (10) 100 MGD Vertical Turbine Pumps
• Magnetic Drives limit to 90% turndown
• Insufficient Submergence
• Pumps, motors and mag drives at end of life
• Proposed System:
• (10) 70 MGD Constant Speed Pumps
• (2) 50 MGD Pumps (VFD’s)
• Premium Efficiency Motors
• New Medium Voltage Electrical Facility
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
• Operational Changes:
• Discharge to FIC – WSE at 26’
• Increase Forebay WSE – Floating Datum concept
• Datum a function of influent flow and headloss
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
• www.pumpcalcs.com
• www.eere.energy.gov
• Hazen colleagues - Brian Porter, Bryan Lisk and Ellen
Hall, among others
Questions?
Richmond, VA
(804) 605-8525
VWEA16_Rogers_Hydraulic Considerations in Pumping System Design
grogers@hazenandsawyer.com