Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
University of Iceland
October 2, 2006
This presentation draws on ideas from Professor Porter’s books and articles, in particular, Competitive Strategy (The Free Press, 1980); Competitive
Advantage (The Free Press, 1985); “What is Strategy?” (Harvard Business Review, Nov/Dec 1996); “Strategy and the Internet” (Harvard Business
Review, March 2001); and a forthcoming book. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or
by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the permission of Michael E. Porter. Additional information may
be found at the website of the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, www.isc.hbs.edu.
COMPETING
COMPETING TO
TO BE
BE THE
THE COMPETING
COMPETING TO
TO BE
BE
BEST
BEST UNIQUE
UNIQUE
• The worst error in strategy is to compete with rivals on the same dimensions
• Strategy as aspiration
– “Our strategy is to be #1 or #2…”
– “Our strategy is to grow…”
– “Our strategy is to be the world leader…”
• Strategy as action
– “Our strategy is to merge…”
– “… internationalize…”
– “… consolidate the industry…”
– “… outsource…”
• Strategy as vision
– “Our strategy is to meet our customers’ needs…”
– “…to advance technology for mankind…”
Autodesk
Transforming business by design
Avon
To be the company that best understands and satisfies the product, service and
self-fulfillment needs of women – globally.
Lafarge
To be the undisputed world leader in building materials
Economic
Economic Shareholder
Shareholder Value
Value
Performance
Performance
$19
Stock
Price $14
(US$)
$9
$4
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Note: Moving averages are over the past 5 years. Return on Equity calculated as net income for the past 12 months divided by common stockholder equity (adjusted for stock splits). Return
on Capital calculated as EBIT / (capital employed plus short-term loans minus intangible assets). Sales converted from New Taiwan Dollars at average yearly rate.
Source: Compustat; Bloomberg; author’s calculations.
20061002 University of Iceland 20060925.ppt 8 Copyright 2006 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Setting the Right Goals
Food Retailing
1.6
Whole Foods
1.4
1.2
Market
Value to 1.0 Average
Sales Ratio Food Retailing Publix
2004 Data 0.8 ROIC
0.6
0.4
Winn-
Dixie Kroger Safeway
Average Food
0.2 Albertson’s Supervalu Retailing Market Value
to Sales Ratio
Food Lion
0.0
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
ROIC Average
Source: Compustat (1999-2004)
Note: ROIC calculated as EBIT divided by Average Invested Capital (Total Assets less Excess Cash less Current Operating Liabilities)
20061002 University of Iceland 20060925.ppt 9 Copyright 2006 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Understanding Economic Performance
Relative
Relative Position
Position
Industry
Industry Within
Within the
the
Structure
Structure Industry
Industry
28.14%
25%
Return on 20%
Invested 19.55%
Capital
1985-2002 15%
12.75%
10%
5% 5.05%
0%
Pharmacia & Upjohn* Southwest Airlines
Industry Average
Source: Compustat
Note: ROIC calculated as EBIT divided by Average Invested Capital (Total Assets less Excess Cash less Current Operating Liabilities)
* Prior to 1995, reflects Pharmacia only. Company was acquired in 2000 by Monsanto, which then changed its name to Pharmacia
20061002 University of Iceland 20060925.ppt 11 Copyright 2006 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Determinants of Long-Term Industry Profitability
Threat of Substitute
Products or Services
Threat of New
Entrants
Differentiation
(Higher Price)
Competitive
Competitive
Advantage
Advantage
Lower Cost
Revenue and Cost per Available Seat Mile, Average of 1998 - 2000
12
Cents
per ASM
6
Operating Cost per
Available Seat Mile
0
Southwest Airline Industry Average
Note: ASM (Available Seat Miles) defined as total seats available multiplied by miles flown
Source: Airline annual reports and author’s calculations
20061002 University of Iceland 20060925.ppt 15 Copyright 2006 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Sources of Competitive Advantage
Activities and the Value Chain
Firm Infrastructure
(e.g. Financing, Planning, Investor Relations)
Primary Activities
Firm Infrastructure
(e.g. Financing, Planning, Investor Relations)
Primary Activities
Operational Strategic
Effectiveness Positioning
•• A
A unique
unique value
value proposition
proposition
compared
compared to
to other
other organizations
organizations
•• A
A different,
different, tailored
tailored value
value chain
chain
•• Clear
Clear tradeoffs,
tradeoffs, and
and choosing
choosing what
what
not
not to
to do
do
•• Activities
Activities that
that fit
fit together
together and
and
reinforce
reinforce each
each other
other
•• Continuity
Continuity ofof strategy
strategy with
with
continual
continual improvement
improvement in in realizing
realizing
the
the strategy
strategy
• Natural, fresh, organic, and prepared foods and • Well-lit, inviting supermarket store formats with
health items with excellent service at premium appealing displays and extensive prepared foods
prices sections
• Produce section as “theater”
• Educated, middle class, and affluent customers • Café-style seating areas with wireless internet for
passionate about food as a part of a healthy meetings and meals
lifestyle • Each store carries local produce and has the authority
to contract with the local farmers
• Information and education provided to shoppers along
with products
• High touch in-store customer service via
knowledgeable, non-unionized, highly motivated
personnel
• Egalitarian compensation structure
• Own seafood procurement and processing facilities to
control quality (and price) from the boat to the counter
• Donates 5% of profits to non-profits
• Each store has “green projects,” directed by
employees to improve environmental performance
What
What Which
Which
Customers?
Customers? Needs?
Needs?
What
What Relative
Relative
Price?
Price?
• A novel value proposition can also grow the pie/expand the industry
Distinctive
Distinctive
Value
Value Proposition
Proposition Activities
Activities
• Home-city replacement cars for drivers • Numerous, small, inexpensive offices in each
whose cars are being repaired or who need metropolitan area, including on-premises offices at
major accounts
an extra vehicle, at low rates (30% below
airport rates) • Open during daylight hours
• Deliver cars to customers’ homes or rental sites,
or deliver customers to cars
• Acquire new and older cars, favoring soon-to-be
discontinued older models
• Keep cars six months longer than other major
rental companies
• In-house reservations
• Cultivate strong relationships with auto
dealerships, body shops, and insurance adjusters
• Grassroots marketing with limited television
• Hire extroverted college graduates to encourage
community interaction and customer service
• Employ a highly sophisticated computer network
to track the fleet
Sources of Tradeoffs
– Incompatible product / service features or attributes
– Differences in the best configuration of activities in the value chain to deliver
the chosen value proposition
– Inconsistencies in image or reputation across positions
– Limits on internal coordination, measurement, motivation, and control
•• “Key”
“Key”Success
SuccessFactors
Factors
•• “Core”
“Core”Competencies
Competencies
•• “Critical”
“Critical”Resources
Resources
Customers
chic but
Very cost-
Global
Little media frequent team of
conscious
advertising product trend-
changes spotters
Advanced
Production production
Extensive in Europe machinery
use of
store sales
data
Tight
Prime store
coordination Very
locations in JIT delivery with 20
high traffic flexible
wholly-owned
areas production
factories
system
• Reinvention and frequent shifts in direction are costly and confuse the
customer, the industry, and the organization
• Continuity of strategy allows learning and change to be faster and more effective
Industry Pressures
• Industry conventional wisdom leads all companies to follow
common practices
Internal Practices
Source: Draws on research conducted at the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness and interviews conducted with a former Neutrogena executive.
•• A
A unique
unique value
value proposition
proposition •• Best
Best practice
practice improvement
improvement
versus
versus competitors
competitors •• Execution
Execution
•• Aspirations
Aspirations
•• A
A different,
different, tailored
tailored value
value chain
chain •• A
A vision
vision
•• Learning
Learning
•• Clear
Clear tradeoffs,
tradeoffs, and
and choosing
choosing •• Agility
Agility
what
what not
not to
to do
do •• Flexibility
Flexibility
•• Innovation
Innovation
•• Activities
Activities that
that fit
fit together
together and
and •• The
The Internet
Internet (or
(or any
any technology)
technology)
reinforce
reinforce each
each other
other •• Downsizing
Downsizing
•• Restructuring
Restructuring
•• Continuity
Continuity ofof strategy
strategy with
with •• Mergers
Mergers // Consolidation
Consolidation
continual
continual improvement
improvement in in realizing
realizing •• Alliances
Alliances // Partnering
Partnering
the
the strategy
strategy
•• Outsourcing
Outsourcing
• The product line consists of well over • The product line consists of several
10,000 SKUs hundred SKUs
• Sales and service activities are carried • Customer relationships and services
out by local sales reps are specified by national contracts
• Value-added services, credit terms, and • Price is the key basis for selection;
distributors’ private-label products are customers do not purchase value-
valued and allow support product/service added services or private-label
differentiation products
Cross
Cross--
Local
Local Regional
Regional National
National Global
Global
National
National
Primary Activities
Procurement a
(e.g. Components, Machinery, Advertising, Services) r
g
Inbound Operations Outbound Marketing After-Sales Service i
Logistics Logistics & Sales
n
(e.g. Incoming (e.g. Installation,
Material Storage, (e.g. Assembly, (e.g. Order (e.g. Sales Force, Customer Support,
Data Collection, Component Processing, Promotion, Complaint
Service, Fabrication, Warehousing, Advertising, Resolution, Repair)
Customer Branch Report Preparation) Trade Shows,
Access) Operations) Proposal Writing)
Primary Activities
• Measure progress against the strategy using metrics that capture the
implications of the strategy for serving customers and performing particular
activities
• Sell the strategy and how to evaluate progress to the financial markets
• The legal and business costs are great for those engaging in practices
deemed unacceptable
• CSR is increasingly important to business leaders, yet the concept and its
justifications remain unclear
Sustainability
"Meeting the needs of the present without compromising future needs”
• Most effective on environmental issues where improvements can yield immediate economic benefits
• In other areas, intangible long term consequences provide a weak justification for short term costs
License to Operate
“Building goodwill to secure the acquiescence of governments and stakeholders”
• Licenses and approvals are necessary
• But this approach cedes control of CSR agenda to external players that do not fully understand
corporate strategy and operations
• Encourages short term and disjointed responses to “the squeakiest wheel” of the moment
Reputation
“Enhancing reputation and brand with customers, investors, and employees”
• Little evidence of sustained competitive advantage
• Emphasizes the visible and popular rather than the social and business impact of corporate activities
• The prevailing justifications are based on broad aspirations that provide little
specific guidance or priorities for company actions
20061002 University of Iceland 20060925.ppt 41 Copyright 2006 © Professor Michael E. Porter
The Intersection of Business and Society
Economic Social
Objectives Objectives
• There is no inherent conflict between economic and social objectives, but a long-term
synergy
20061002 University of Iceland 20060925.ppt 42 Copyright 2006 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Inside-Out Links with Society
The Value Chain
• Education, job training
• Relationships with • Financial reporting practices
• Working conditions
universities • Governance practices
• Diversity in hiring
• Ethical research practices
(e.g. animal testing, GMOs) • Employee health care
Firm Infrastructure
(e.g. Financing, Planning, Investor Relations)
• Product safety
Human Resource Management
Support (e.g. Recruiting, Training, Compensation System) • Product recycling
Activities Technology Development and disposal
(e.g. Product Design, Testing, Process Design, Material Research, Market Research)
M
Value
• Procurement practices Procurement a
(e.g. Components, Machinery, Advertising, Services) r What
(e.g. child labor, illegal g buyers are
willing to
diamonds, pricing to Inbound Operations Outbound Marketing After-Sales i
pay
Logistics Logistics & Sales Service n
farmers) (e.g. Incoming
Material (e.g. Assembly,
• Use of particular inputs Storage, Data Component
(e.g. Order
Processing,
(e.g. Sales Force,
Promotion,
(e.g. Installation,
Customer • Disposal of obsolete
Collection, Fabrication, Support,
(e.g. fur) Service,
Customer
Branch
Operations)
Warehousing,
Report
Advertising,
Proposal Complaint products
Preparation) Writing, Web Resolution,
• Utilization of natural
Access) site) Repair) • Handling of consumables
resources (e.g. motor oil, printing ink)
Primary Activities
• Process pollution,
energy use • Marketing practices
• Transportation impacts • Recycling (e.g. to children)
(e.g. congestion, logging • Hazardous materials • Pricing practices
roads) (e.g. pricing to the poor)
• Packaging disposal
(e.g. McDonalds Clamshell) • Use of consumer information
• Energy usage/pollution • Privacy
• Every activity in the value chain impinges on social factors in the locations where the
company operates. These impacts can be positive
43
or negative.
20061002 University of Iceland 20060925.ppt Copyright 2006 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Outside-In Social Impact
z Presence of high quality, specialized inputs z Access to capital
available to firms (open markets, government regulation)
– Human resources z Vigorous local competition
(e.g., Marriott’s job training) (absence of trade barriers, fair regulations)
– Physical infrastructure z Intellectual property protection
(e.g., Nestlé's milk collection dairies) z Transparency
– Administrative infrastructure
(financial reporting, corruption--e.g., Extractive
– Information infrastructure
Industries Transparency Initiative)
(e.g., Nestlé's knowledge transfer to milk
z Rule of law
farmers)
– Scientific and technological infrastructure (Security, protection of property, legal system)
(e.g., Intel’s investment in global wireless Context for z Meritocratic incentive system
(Opportunities for educational advancement)
access) Firm Strategy
– Natural resources
(e.g., Grupo Nuevo’s water conservation)
and Rivalry
Factor
Demand
(Input)
Conditions
Conditions
• Many of these elements are influenced by or inextricably linked with social conditions
Source: Michael Porter, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, 1990
20061002 University of Iceland 20060925.ppt 44 Copyright 2006 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Defining the Corporate Social Agenda
• Which issues fall into each category will differ by industry, cluster, company
and location
20061002 University of Iceland 20060925.ppt 45 Copyright 2006 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Corporate Involvement in Society: A Strategic Approach