Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
A strategy of co-branding: Oyo does not own any of the rooms that it lets out. But
it is more like a hotel aggregation platform where the buyer and seller are allowed
to transact with each other through a common window provided by Oyo. Thus they
just cobrand with various budget hotels but do not own the rooms.
Poor service quality: Though Oyo has tried to standardize amenities for each room
based on the prices they charge, they have not been able to do the same with
services. This has made the service quality and reliability highly questionable.
Tight margins: Hotels that are on a tie-up with Oyo can also loop in other agents
for which Oyo cannot do anything much to circumvent. In this context, the model
thrives solely on how well the margins they provide for their hotels are which can
be risky in the long run.
THREATS
COMMISSION
The revenue model has also transformed as the business model changed from
aggregator to franchise. Earlier the brand used to lease hotels at a
predetermined price and offered them to the users at a take-up rate. This has
been changed to a commission-based revenue model.
Oyo rooms charges a commission of 22% from its hotel partners. However, this
commission does vary according to the services provided by the brand.
Additionally, the company reported that weakening occupancy growth is weighing on hotels.
Despite modest supply growth in the U.S., Moody’s noted demand growth has slowed to 2.1
percent during the first eight months of 2019, compared to 2.9-percent growth in the previous
year. As a result, occupancy and average-daily-rate growth have slowed over the same period.
That has resulted in RevPAR growth of 1.2 percent in comparison to the metric’s 3.5-percent
increase experienced in the prior year.
https://www.hotelmanagement.net/own/moody-s-u-s-hotel-industry-outlook-downgraded
https://reviews.cheapism.com/cheap-hotel/#knights-inn-review