Prialatha P and Malarmathi K (2011) in their study on factors influencing rural
consumer buying behaviour towards personal care products in Coimbatore
District among 100 customers found that quality was the highly influencing factor. There was significant difference across respondents of varying education level with regard to the influence of quality, nearness to selling point and retailer factors. There was significant difference across age groups with regard to package, habitual and retail factors. Female respondents were found to be more influenced by `income’ factor. Respondents who were `single’ were found to be more influenced by brand name than married respondents. Ujwala B (2012) in her study on consumer buying behaviour of personal care products in More super market, Chitoor district among 110 used chi-square analysis and found that factors likes brand, price, quality ingredients, ease of use and availability affected the buying decision of personal care products, 43% felt that advertisement influenced purchasing decision, Majority of the respondents preferred Head and shoulders, 38% preferred Santoor, 62% preferred Colgate, 33% bought products for price. Majority spent 10%-12% of their income on personal care products> Gabriela Mendieta, Home & Personal Care Analysis-The soap, bath and shower market can expect to see growth in the next few years due to near universal consumer usage of these products for hygiene maintenance along with a lack of competitive alternatives. However, this market does have some issues it will need to address: private level offering are slowly starting to grab market share and sales from branded offering; consumer are expecting more from their soap products ;and there is growing concern around the chemicals being used in personal care offerings, new product benefits, and ways of helping consumers to feel better about the products that they use. Anju Thapa (2012) in his study on consumer switching behaviour- a study of shampoo brands had found that out of 64 respondents from Jammu ,53.12% were below 22 years, 93.75% used shampoos, 68.75% used it twice a week, 40.62% bought shampoo thrice in a month, 53.12% used only one brand of shampoo, 75% concentrated on important ingredients present in shampoo, 62.5% preferred quality, 40.62% preferred healthy root and tips, 71.8% took decision by themselves and 43.75% changed their brand due to advertisements. Siddharth Shriram shimpi and Sinha (2013) in their study on consumer’s buying behaviour and product attributes among 156 males in Pune City used factor analysis which revealed six factors from rotated component matrix. Component 1 included texture of product, promised effect, previous usage experience and suitability to skin type. Component 2 included packaging, ingredients, product and innovativeness. The other components were packaging, advertising, store location, manufacture’s credibility price, brand, quality and affordability. Syamala G (2013) in her study on consumer behaviour towards Prialatha and Malar Mathi, (2011)16 evaluated the various factors affecting the rural consumer buying behavior towards personal care products and identified the level of influence of various factors on the purchase of personal care products by rural consumers of Coimbatore district. The Stratified Random Sampling method was used to collect the data from 100 respondents. From the analysis, it was found that there was a significant difference across age group of respondents with regard to the influence of Package, Habitual and Retailer factors. It was found that the variations across marital status of respondents, in case of brand name, friends/social groups and income factors. The study showed that the rural consumers were more concerned about the quality, brand name and brand benefits of the personal care products purchased by them. The factors included were related to the personal care brands and rural consumers. From the study, it was evident that quality of personal care brands was given more emphasis and the difference in educational level of respondents was significant in case of certain factors namely quality, nearness to selling point and retailer care products Kumaravel and Vikkraman (2013) investigated the consumer behavior towards FMCG products with reference to personal care products. 48 per cent of the consumers are purchasing personal care at regular interval. 34 per cent of the consumers are purchasing personal care products on necessity and 18 per cent of the consumers are purchasing personal care products occasionally. In the price range 42.5 per cent of the consumers are purchasing low priced brand. Prialatha and Malar Mathi (2011)29 found that rural consumers were more concerned about the quality, brand name and brand benefits of the personal care products purchased by them. Further it was also found that once the rural consumers found that certain brands were suitable to them, they did not change it easily due to influence of friends / social group and lack of availability of their usual brands. Friends / Social group were found to have considerable influence on respondents who were single, as they involved in brand discussions to decide their purchase. Package factor has considerable influence on younger respondents as they preferred attractive package colors and design, while illiterates often identified their brand with the color of the package rather than the brand name.