Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
pinoy case digest, digested cases, case digest, case digests, philippine digested cases, digest case pinoy
Home
Contact Us / Share Digest
Tecson was hired by Glaxo as a medical representative on Oct. 24, 1995. Contract of employment
signed by Tecson stipulates, among others, that he agrees to study and abide by the existing
company rules; to disclose to management any existing future relationship by consanguinity or
affinity with co-employees or employees with competing drug companies and should
management find that such relationship poses a prossible conflict of interest, to resign from the
company. Company's Code of Employee Conduct provides the same with stipulation that
management may transfer the employee to another department in a non-counterchecking position
or preparation for employment outside of the company after 6 months.
Tecson was initially assigned to market Glaxo's products in the Camarines Sur-Camarines Norte
area and entered into a romantic relationship with Betsy, an employee of Astra, Glaxo's
competition. Before getting married, Tecson's District Manager reminded him several times of the
conflict of interest but marriage took place in Sept. 1998. In Jan. 1999, Tecson's superiors
informed him of conflict of intrest. Tecson asked for time to comply with the condition (that either
he or Betsy resign from their respective positions). Unable to comply with condition, Glaxo
transferred Tecson to the Butuan-Surigao City-Agusan del Sur sales area. After his request
against transfer was denied, Tecson brought the matter to Glaxo's Grievance Committee and
while pending, he continued to act as medical representative in the Camarines Sur-Camarines
Norte sales area. On Nov. 15, 2000, the National Conciliation and Mediation Board ruled that
Glaxo's policy was valid...
ISSUE:
Whether or not the policy of a pharmaceutical company prohibiting its employees from marrying
employees of any competitor company is valid
RULING:
On Equal Protection
Glaxo has a right to guard its trade secrets, manufacturing formulas, marketing strategies, and
other confidential programs and information from competitors. The prohibition against pesonal or
marital relationships with employees of competitor companies upon Glaxo's employees is
reasonable under the circumstances because relationships of that nature might compromise the
interests of the company. That Glaxo possesses the right to protect its economic interest cannot
be denied.
It is the settled principle that the commands of the equal protection clause are addressed only to
the state or those acting under color of its authority. Corollarily, it has been held in a long array of
US Supreme Court decisions that the equal protection clause erects to shield against merely
privately conduct, however, discriminatory or wrongful.
The company actually enforced the policy after repeated requests to the employee to comply with
the policy. Indeed the application of the policy was made in an impartial and even-handed manner,
with due regard for the lot of the employee.
On Constructive Dismissal
Share
No comments:
Post a Comment
‹
›
Home
Civil Law
Remedial Law
Legal Forms for Bar 2019
Jurat
Acknowledgment
Judicial Affidavit (Civil)
Judicial Affidavit (Criminal)
Authorization Letter
Demand Letter
Motion for Extension of Time
Motion to Declare Defendant in Default
Motion to Dismiss
Notice And Hearing
Deed of Absolute Sale
Deed of Conditional Sale
Contract of Lease
Contract of Lease of Real Property
Contract of Lease of Personal Property
Special Power of Attorney
Verification and Certification of Non-forum Shopping
Legal Forms
Acknowledgement of Debt
Acknowledgement Receipt
Acknowledgment
Affidavit
Affidavit of Good Faith
Affidavit of Loss
Affidavit of Merit
Agreement
Answer with Special and Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaim
Answer with Specific Denial of Document Under Oath
Answer with Third Party Complaint
Articles of General Partnership
Articles of Incorporation
Articles of Limited Partnership
Authorization Letter
Bill of Exchange
Certificate of Candidacy
Certificate to File Action
Certification of Non-forum Shopping
Chattel Mortgage
Comment/ Opposition to Offer
Complaint
Complaint Declaratory Relief
Complaint for Interpleader
Complaint for Replevin
Complaint for Unlawful Detainer
Contract of Lease
Contract of Lease of Personal Property
Contract of Lease of Real Property
Contract of Real Estate Mortgage
Counter- Affidavit
Criminal Complaint Affidavit
Deed of Absolute Sale
Deed of Adjudication
Deed of Assignment.
Deed of Conditional Sale
Deed of Donation Inter Vivos
Deed of Donation Mortis Causa
Deed of Repurchase of Land Sold Under Pacto de Retro
Deed of Sale of Personal Property
Deed of Sale of Unregistered Land
Deed of Sale with Pacto de Retro
Demand Letter
Demurrer to Evidence
Election Protest
General Power of Attorney
Holographic Will
Information
Judicial Affidavit (Civil)
Judicial Affidavit (Criminal)
Jurat
Katarungang Pambarangay
Legal Opinion
Motion for Bail
Motion for Extension
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
Motion for New Trial
Motion for Postponement of Hearing
Motion to Declare Defendant in Default
Motion to Dismiss
Motion to Intervene
Motion to Lift Order of Default
Motion to Quash
Notarial Will
Notice And Hearing
Notice of Appeal
Petition for Adoption
Petition for Certiorari
Petition for Change of Name
Petition for Extradition
Petition for Guardianship
Petition for Habeas Corpus
Petition for Habeas Data
Petition for Mandamus
Petition for Prohibition
Petition for Quo Warranto
Petition for Writ of Amparo
Pleading (Blank Form)
Pledge Agreement
Prayer
Pre-trial Brief
Probate of Will
Promissory Note
Proof of Service
Proof of Service Through Registered Mail with Explanation
Revocation of Power of Attorney
Secretary’s Certificate
Special Power of Attorney
Substitution of Counsel
Treasurer’s Affidavit
Trial Memorandum
Verification
Verification and Certification of Non-forum Shopping
Waiver of Pre-emptive Rights
Powered by Blogger.