Osiris-iah

Osiris-iah

The Origin
of
The Theomorphic Name
“iah”
There are lots of opinions about Osiris. Our focus on him is only the use of
“iah” as his theomorphic name. His image above with the moon upon his head
was considered his message that he was a son of the moon god, therefore a
god himself. The moon was called the “silver Aten.” The name Osiris is Greek.
His Egyptian name was Usir. It is believed this means “place of the eye.” The
eye symbol in hieroglyphics is thought to represent his presence. There is a
claim he came from Syria to Egypt and became it’s first god king, thus his
name “Osiris-iah.”

The Origin
of
The Theomorphic Name “iah”
by
Pastor G. Reckart
(acts238church@gmail.com)
Jesus House
4401 Cooper Road Plant City, Florida 33565
Copyright January 21,2020
All Rights Reserved
 Table Of Contents
In the beginning God. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1
Iah, Yah, Jah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1
YHWH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 3
My response then and now. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 3
Iah, Yah, Jah use in the Bible . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 7
Moabite Stone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 7
YHVH Pronunciation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 9
The YHWH name changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page10
Let me recap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 11
Theophoric names (God names) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 12
Origin of Iah (iah) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 19
The origin of “iah” and its first use in the land of Canaan. . . . . . . . Page 24
Textual Translation, Conflation, and Corruption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 24
Jesus and the Apostles used only the LXX Septuagint . . . . . . . . . . Page 25
Birkat haMinim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 28
Origin the conflator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 30
Anthromorphic use from Egypt into the land of Israel . . . . . . . . . . Page 32
Greek Septuagint LXX distortations and lies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 34
The New Testament And The Absence of “iah” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 38
The Matthew genealogy names. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 38
The Luke genealogy names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 39
The name of the Father . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 42

The name of God . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 44

Translation of Moabite Stone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Appendix “A”

Alphabet charts proving the “J” letter sound is ancient . . . . . Appendix “B”

What abouts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Appendix “C”

Letter “J” information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Appendix “D”

Iah, Yah, Jah

In my first debate, the second session, with the Yahweh prophets back in
1993, they asked the question: why I said hallelujah if I opposed the name of
Yahweh, because “Jah and Yah” were the deity being praised?

They presented the following evidence to prove this:

--hallelujah (Urban Dictionary)

Hallelujah means to praise God. It is considered the highest praise by some

Christians, and literally means "Let us praise God".

Hallelujah is also sometimes considered halleluyah, because that’s how it’s

pronounced, and because God's names are "Jahova" or short form "Jah", or
"Yahwah", or a short form "Yah", which composes the ending of the word.

So, “jah” is the same as yah.

Jah is also short for Jahova.
Jah is also short for Yahwah.
Literally means “let us praise God.”

So, jah, yah, Jahova, Yahwah, are all the same deity.

The same men produce a plethora of books that stated “Iah, Jah, and Yah”
were the same God as YHWH the tetragrammaton national deity of Israel. One
of them was the Greek/Hebrew lexicon of James Strong. To them, he was the
13th apostle and his words could be considered inspired, divine, and without

Page 1 of 50
error. His definitions were considered infallible and unimpeachable. They cited
Hebrew #3068 that renders the tetragrammaton 6510 times as Jehovah. Then
they backed this up with another Strong’s reference Hebrew #1961 where the
tetragrammaton is rendered “hayah.” With emphasis on the “yah.”

To them it was a slam dunk. I was cornered and how would I escape the
information put forward by the experts, the rabbis, the monks, and the
scholars? I was no expert and they weren’t either. But, I was a man of God and
they were backslid prophets of Yahweh.

To finish me off they pulled out the Brenton LXX Greek Septuagint version of
the bible and opened to Psalms chapters 147 through 150 where Praise the
Lord in the KJV is found as “alleluia.” They sneered: you trust in the LXX as the
true bible what are you going to do with that?

They also produced a large collection of Jewish songs, religious liturgy, and
prayers where hallelujah or alleluia in some fashion was used. This was
supposed to prove once and for all that “Iah, Yah, and Jah” were shortened
forms of Jehovah and Yahweh because even the rabbis say so.

For their last fiery dart they produced Psalms 68:4:

Psa_68:4 Sing unto God, sing praises to his name: extol him that
rideth upon the heavens by his name JAH, and rejoice before him.

All of this information was supposed to prove several things:

God’s names were Jehovah or Yahweh;

Yah or iah were the short from of Yahweh;
Yah and Jah were the same deity;
Yah also meant “lord” so that in saying hallelujah or alleluia it meant “praise
the lord.”
Lord in all of these praises was YHWH the tetragrammaton deity;
The Jews used hallelujah and alleluia;
The rabbis, monks, Greek and Hebrew scholars verified the biblical evidence
that YHWH was the root of Yah and Jah;
The tetragrammaton was in the bible 6,510 times and this was the deity being
praised by saying hallelujah and alleluia.

Page 2 of 50
It would take a more detailed work to deal will all of these beliefs. But by the
time I am finished with my study all of these will be dealt with in one way or
another.

YHWH

This tetragrammaton is the basis for the following names:

Yah,
Jah,
Iah,
Jehovah,
Jehova,
Jehowah,
Yahweh,
Yahwah,
Yahuah.

And the authority for and basis of the words “hallelujah, halleluyah, and
alleluia.”

So when I was asked by Jerry Kirk and Arnold Bowen about hallelujah I was
ready to answer.

My response then and now:

First, in my book “Praise The Name Of Jesus Christ” I dealt with this word.
It is not found in the Old or New Testaments in the hallelujah or the halleluyah
forms. The praise that is found in the New Testament is “Hosanna” (Matthew
21:9, 15; Mark 11:9-10; John 12:3). Hosanna was the highest praise that day.
Hallelujah did not exit and would not for about another 1711 years.

Second, alleluia in Revelation 19 is an interpolation which means someone

added it to the book just like it was added to the LXX and also the Babylonian
Aramaic. We know this because a parallel text of this same event in chapter
7 omits it. We also know that the ancient Greek use of this word had nothing
to do with a god or a praise to God. My image on the next page will show the
ancient use of the word “alleluia” in Greek. You will notice it does not end
originally in “ia” which we are told means the god Yah, Jah, Iah, Jehovah and

Page 3 of 50
Yahweh. If in 500BC, 300BC, 200BC, 100BC, this word had not been
transferred to the LXX or the Babylonian Aramaic for it to be generally used as
a praise in Israel, how did it get into the LXX, the Babylonian Aramaic (to call
it Hebrew), or into the book of Revelation?

Third, hallelujah was unknown to anyone prior to its

invention by Catholic George F. Handel in 1741. He
performed his “Messiah” containing it in December
1742 in Christ Catholic church in Dublin, Ireland.
Indeed he invented it from “alleluia” in the Latin
Vulgate bible.

I then told my Yahweh opponents and the crowd that

had gathered, I stopped using this word when I
discovered the “iah” connection to yah and jah. So,
I was not on the spot using a praise to Yah or Jah,
Yahweh or Jehovah. I was hallelujah free.
I was a “hosanna” man.

Take a look at this information published

in 1843 in the lexicon on Greek. This was
before the avalanche of word magicians
trying to save the hallelujah and alleluia
words. The whole of the internet has
been purged. But I am putting it before
your face for critical analysis.

According to the newly invented doctrine

the word “alleluia” comes from Hebrew.
They call it biblical Hebrew but it is not
Hebrew it is Babylonian Aramaic. But in
any case here is what is now commonly
reported on the internet:

Page 4 of 50
 A careful analysis of the facts:

From Hebrew halal? What Hebrew? They

mean Babylonian Aramaic. Aramaic may
have ‘halal” but there is no proof this ever
existed in Paleo-Hebrew. And more to the
point, why does “halal” mean “permissible”
in Arabic and Arabic and Aramaic are
basically the same language. Both have
Aramaic roots.

Alleluia could not have been in the Hebrew

bible before 500BC. It was not in the
Aramaic at the time of Jesus. It was not in
the original LXX having David speaking this word. And to say in every place it
is now found he said instead “hahal” is untenable and utterly preposterous.
The Apostles never used it. And when the multitude cried out to Jesus during
the triumphal entry they did not say “hallelujah or alleluia.” Instead they cried
the real praise: “hosanna.” And there is not Yah, Jah, Iah, Jehovah, or Yahweh
behind that praise.

The Paleo-Hebrew bible was

burned up.

Paleo-Hebrew became a dead

language: “Strictly speaking,
classical biblical Hebrew is a
dead language” (Jeff A. Brenner,
instructor of biblical Hebrew).

Aramaic or what became called

“biblical Hebrew also became a
dead language.

Aramaic replaced Hebrew in

ancient times (Goldsmith,
Emanuel S. (1997). Modern
Yiddish culture: the story of the Yiddish language movement).

“Hebrew was driven out first by Aramaic, then by Greek, and finally by
Arabic”(Jewish Encyclopedia-Targums-Crawford Howell Toy and Richard

Page 5 of 50
Gotthiel).

So, what Hebrew had “alleluia”?

None! James Strong admitted it was not declinable back to Hebrew. So it must
be forced back by nothing but the clever work of word magicians who make up
lies, make up definitions, and develop sources to give traditions the power of
Truth when they are all lies. Lies so powerful that after centuries of
brainwashing, few men are capable of getting away from the rabbi and scholar
deceptions. They live, walk, and think in darkness. They can spit out all the
lies, quotes from liars, opinions of deceptive rabbis, monks, scholars, and
Yahweh cult members, but cannot speak the Truth.

Babylonian Aramaic which was claimed to be the lingua franca at the time of
Jesus in 30AD was a dead language by 150AD. How is it possible that in that
short amount of time it died and was replaced? Unless it was not a lingua
franca since around 200BC. In the days of Christ more Jews spoke Greek than
Aramaic. Isn’t this why the bible scrolls in the synagogues were in Greek and
why the “Isaias” scroll with a Greek name was brought to Jesus?

If Aramaic was so important, and the Aramaic bible was so important, why did
Rabbi Akvia and his Jamnia Council hire Aquila to make a new Greek bible?
They already had the Aramaic one which they claimed was copied accurately
letter by letter, line by line, page by page and book by book. Why the new
Greek one which they now have scholars deceived the old LXX was corrupt. A
corrupt bible they used from 280BC to 90AD (370 years)? None of the lies that
the LXX was corrupt adds up. Why wait until 90AD to declare this? Jesus and
the Apostles didn’t think the LXX was corrupt. Who do we believe? The ones
who crucified Jesus or the Apostles? I think you know my choice.

Alleluia was not in any bible, not even the book of Revelation in 90AD. And the
claim it comes from Hebrew “halal” is not halal (in the Aramaic-Arabic sense).

Iah, Yah, Jah use in the Bible

It is true YHWH tetragrammaton is found in the Babylonian Aramaic text as

created by Rabbi Aaron Ben Asher around 900BC which was subsequently
vowed marked by unknown persons.

It is true YHWH is found in the Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS). But in admission of
this, I must also point out that the DSS are a conflation of the Aramaic text of

Page 6 of 50
300BC that was made in Babylon. There is no proof it is an authentic copy. The
DSS are not an authentic copy of the original Paleo-Hebrew text from which
the Aramaic was translated. This is why scholars can boast that the Aramaic
text constructed by the Rabbi Aaron Ben Asher Masoretes is in agreement with
these scrolls. The DSS and the MT have many differences. You can Goggle
them on your own time. This by its admission is prima fascia proof there is no
connection of either of these with the original Paleo-Hebrew. There is no direct
linkage of the DSS and the MT with the original 300BC Aramaic or the Paleo-
Hebrew, except via conflated and corrupt copies. They are extant from this
original by so many conflations that to place any value on YHWH being the
legitimate name of God from these documents hangs totally upon opinion.

Moabite Stone

In my debates I was presented with a photo of the Moabite Stone where line
18 was highlighted. I am attaching a copy of the Moabite Stone as well as
presenting the translation in the appendix.

My opponents believed this was a game changer. Jerry Kirk said to everyone
present how great it would be if they could now convert me to Yahweh and the
tetragrammaton. But, I was already
prepared for this magic show.

Now if you are not a scholar, the

information on this stone will convince you
the God of the whole nation Israel was a
deity named YHVH.

This stone goes back to about 840BC to the

time of two kings of the northern 10 tribes
whose predecessors had revolted against
the house of David in the days of Jeroboam
(1Kings 12:12-23).

Jeroboam became king over the northern 10

tribes and the name of his kingdom was
Israel the same as the whole nation was
named. There were two Israel kingdoms.
One with 10 tribes to the north with its
capital in Shechem in Mount Ephraim and
one with 2 tribes to the south with
Jerusalem as its capital. On the stone king

Page 7 of 50
of Moab was Mesha. He tells about the wars with Omri king of the northern ten
tribes. He talks about his son. Who was that son?

According to 1Kings 16:30 it was Ahab.

Mesha talks about Mount Nebo. Now Mount Nebo was in the jurisdiction of the
norther ten tribes. And on that mountain an altar was built. This altar
according to Mesha was in worship to the god of Omri and Ahab’s Israel. No
where on the stone does Mesha mention the Jerusalem Israel or the God of the
southern 2 tribes. Mesha speaks of the altar to YHVH as it being the altar to
the god of Omri and his son Ahab, because it was in Ahab’s day he captured
Mount Nebo and dragged off the altar of YHVH.

Anyone can see that this YHVH deity was not the God of the Jerusalem Israel
but the god of Omri and Ahab’s Israel. Omri and Ahab never worshiped the
God of Jerusalem. From the days of Jeroboam and his calves in Bethel and in
Dan to Omri and Ahab (about 110 years) their gods were the calves and Baal.

Between Jeroboam and Ahab there is about 110 years. Not once in all of those
years did the northern ten tribes worship the God of the Jerusalem Israel. The
god of Ahab’s Israel was Baal. All the altars erected for that 110 years was to
the calves and to Baal. North Israel did not allow any
altars to the God of the Jerusalem Israel. So the
question is: was YHVH on the Moabite Stone Baal or
the God of Jerusalem? Do not confuse the name
Israel to mean the whole nation or the Israel with
capital in Jerusalem. If you do this, you are as
dishonest as the devil himself.

From the words of Mesha, he dragged off the altar of

YHVH as if he had defeated the god of Omri and Ahab
his son. I am rolling with that. So, the Moabite Stone
with YHVH is not a game changer. And it will never
convert me to Yahweh or the tetragrammaton. If you
would like to review a translation of the Moabite
Stone I will place it in the appendix.

YHVH Pronunciation

It is confessed by rabbis and scholars that YHWH

cannot with certainly be pronounced because the

Page 8 of 50
vowels are unknown. It is also confessed that the vowel marks of YHWH by
either Rabbi Aaron Ben Asher or his successors sound out Jehovah. Scholars
are now saying that Rabbi Asher deceived the world. That Gilbertus
Gennebardus in 1567AD discovered the name of God in the Samaritan bible
and it was YaBe (Yave). From this, YaBe was massaged, and given a few
chiropractor cracks, and Yahweh walked out of the name of God clinic of the
Catholic church. Jehovah was Catholic church invented and now 287 years
later another monk takes his hand to invent another name for God. But please
notice it is not from YHWH. It is from YV. No tetragrammaton at all.

Religious theologians are now shoving out the Jehovah name and teaching
everywhere that God’s name is Yahweh. And in this new name Yahweh they
confess that in the old name Jehovah there was absolutely no Yah, Jah, or Iah
connection with the first two letters Y and H. Any claim to the contrary is
nothing but word magic and goes to the point of saying Jehovah is not the
name of God because it lacks the prefix Yah or Jah. To overcome this obvious
problem and to save Yah and Jah several possible spellings are presented that
have absolutely no honesty in them at all.

It is often presented by the rabbis and scholars how careful the Massoretic text
scribes were in copying the letters in the scrolls (all Jewish fables). So many
letters per line, so many per page, so many per section and the fables go on
and so on. How they had to make themselves kosher in several ways to even
copy the letters. The manner in which the holy ink is prepared. How the scrolls
were handled and stored. These fables have one purpose, to get people to
believe God used these men to preserve his bible. And to get them to believe
they can trust every word in the Aramaic bible. The problem with this, is that
God saw no purpose to preserve the Paleo-Hebrew bible after it was translated
into Greek and Jesus authenticated it was the Greek bible in his day that could
be trusted. There is no Christian history that Christ used or respected the
Aramaic bible from Babylon. So the fables go on and on and on.

But none of this saves the fact that centuries of rabbis and scholars were lying.
How can rabbi Aaron Ben Asher construct a new Aramaic text from gathered
scraps if he received (received text argument) a complete Aramaic text that
was handed down to him by special preservation? And how can he and the
scribes vowel mark the letters YHWH to pronounce Jehovah when those letters
had not been pronounced for over 800 years. Scholars confess the name was
lost. It was called the lost name or the lost word by the Masonic cult. No one
heard those four letters pronounced for centuries. So no one could pass it on.
It is mazing to me that YHWH ends up with Jehovah or Iehovah a Latin name.
Not a Paleo-Hebrew or even an Aramaic name.

Page 9 of 50
It also amazing to me that for 1,100 years (900AD-2020AD) YHWH was
allegedly pronounced Jehovah by rabbis secretly mouth to ear to keep it from
being profaned. We are told by the Kabbalist the pronunciation was hidden in
the “Shem HaMephorash” among 72 letters and the pronunciation of the name
was never lost. Some scholars dismiss the occult Kabbalist as dabblers in
mysticism who know nothing about how the name is pronounced. Now,
scholars say the real pronunciation of YHWH is Yahweh a Samaritan name not
a Hebrew one. But fact is, it is a Latin name invented from Samaritan YaBe.

You may have missed all these shenanigan but not me.

Let me say here that the Jews can have what ever religion they want. They
can have whatever deity they want. They are entitled to religious freedom like
everyone else. And they have a right to be wrong. They were wrong about
Jesus. Wrong to replace the LXX to remove messianic text pointing to Jesus.
Bad wrong to invent the Birkat haMinim and curse Christians for nearly 2000
years. Wrong to write evil about Mary in the Babylonian Talmud. Wrong to
speak evil of Christian women and men. And wrong to believe God wants
another temple built to replace the ones their evils against Jesus caused to be
destroyed. They can have whatever religious beliefs and customs and continue
their fables. This bible study is for Christians. It is specifically written to
oppose the YHWH tetragrammaton deity and his cognate names Yah, Jah, and
Iah. It is finally written to praise the name of Jesus Christ, name above all
names.

The YHWH name changes

YHWH as Jehovah contains 3 syllables and three vowels. Yahweh is two

syllables and two vowels. The rabbis and scholars tell us that in the creation
of Jehovah the vowels are taken from Adonay which are “a, o, and y.” They
tell us that in the original Aramaic scrolls which they cleverly now call biblical
Hebrew, that in the margin across from YHWH would be the word Adonay. So
that when the reader got to the YHWH name he would read Adonay. In this
way he would not accidently pronounce the name of God. Now isn’t this a little
nefarious when the same scholars claim the pronunciation was lost for over
900 years? How could a reader even know how to pronounce those letters and
need to pronounce Adonay to stop him from pronouncing the name of God
accidently?

I must say something here about the continued century after century
corruption of calling Aramaic by the name biblical Hebrew. Aramaic never was
Hebrew. To call it biblical Hebrew because it gives the Aramaic a priority over

Page 10 of 50
the Greek Septuagint is ingenious. But it demonstrates the fraud and the
conspiracy to promote YHWH and all of the fables associated with it.

Let me recap:

YHWH according to the scholars is originally Jehovah and there is no Yah, Jah,
or Iah in the first two letters Y and H.
YHWH according to many scholars since 1567A, these letters spell out Yahweh.
And by changing the first vowel from “e” in Jehovah to “a” in Yahweh, they can
now claim there is a connection to Yah, Jah, and Iah in the first two letters.
Yah, Jah, and Iah now hang on by corrupting the vowel points of the Rabbi
Aaron Ben Asher text so Yahweh can exist. Without this corruption there is no
Yah, Jah, or Iah as the first three letters to a divine name based upon YHWH.
The use of Yah, Jah, and Iah must now be proven using other strategies. Part
of this conspiracy is to go back to Strong’s H#1961 and the root “hayah” as the
origin of the name Jehovah. But isn’t it amazing that in using “hayah” they
never actually spell out Jehovah or Yahweh using it. They use “hayah” only to
try and give Jehovah or Yahweh names a meaning such as “I will be or I am,”
or some other meaning. But these never attempt to take “yah” from this
“hayah” as the root of where Yah, Jah, or Iah come from.

Let me point out here that “hayah” does not save Yah, Jah, or Iah because
“hayah” is not even Hebrew it is “late Syriac” and means “to fall.”

“This hypothesis is not intrinsically improbable, and in Aramaic, a

language closely related to Hebrew, "to be" actually is hawa--but
it should be noted that in adopting it we admit that, using the
name Hebrew in the historical sense, Yahweh is not a Hebrew
name.” -Ency Brit 11Ed Vol 15 p 321.

“The causative theme of hayah is found in no Semitic language,

except the late Syriac, but is replaced by that of some other root.
Those, therefore who still regard it as causative refer it to hawah,
found once in Hebrew in the form hawa "fell"; they interpret this
as "he who causes to fall" (Robertson Smith; cf. Arab. "haway".
-Ency Brit 1958 Ed Vol 12, p 996.

So you can see that James Strong in his lexicon gives us “hayah” in H#1961
as if it is really a Hebrew word and it is not. He does not even tell us “hayah”
is not Hebrew. He gives it in Aramaic letters but this word never existed in
Paleo-Hebrew or Aramaic letters. It was borrowed for convenience.

Page 11 of 50
 No where in all of this does he tell us that the
original word in Hebrew is not from Hebrew
but from late Syriac. Now what is meant by
“late Syriac?” This particular Syriac dates from
200-100BC. This means there is no such
thing in Paleo-Hebrew from the time of Moses
to 200BC. So, this so-called “hayah” can be
found in any manner with Exodus 3:14 (1200
years prior) where it is interpolated to come
up with the “I AM that I AM” fake name
claimed as the place “hayah” (as a causative verb which any honest scholar
will tell you does not exist in Paleo-Hebrew). So to apply this word magic to
“Ehyeh asher Ehyeh” is borderline witchcraft. It is conjuring up both a
definition and calling up out of the midst of the cauldron an invented name.

If you are not an honest bible student all of this will not matter to you because
you will believe whatever the rabbis, monks, scholars, and pundits say. All I
can say is you will need a change of heart to recognize the Truth and then
stand for it. Only by being honest can you catch the meaning of everything I
am saying. I am saying “Yah, Jah, Iah” did not exist in the Paleo-Hebrew as
any part of the meaning of YHWH as is it has been interpolated into the
Aramaic bible text in 6510 places. So, this throws out on the face of it the
names Yah, Jah, Iah, and Yahweh.

Theophoric names (God names)

THeophoric names are names to which the name of a god is attached either as
a prefix (beginning) or as a suffix (ending).

One of the great deceptions by the YHWH cults is to gather the names of Old
Testament people whose names contain Yah as a prefix or “iah” as a suffix. An
example is Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Elijah. These names are changed by the
YHWH cults into Yeshayahu (Isaiah) Yesha-YAHU
Yiramiyahu (Jeremiah) Yiremi-YAHU, and Eliyahu (Elijah) Eli-YAHU.

As you can see by the alterations of the names Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Elijah
they change the three last letters into “YAHU” every time. Where did they get
this stuff? There is no name in the bible ending in “yahu.” This is all invent
stuff. But scholars have created this fictitious name in their mining the Old
Testament in search for the divine name. From this work of word magic they
are able to take the theophoric names and make them into a different

Page 12 of 50
theophoric name. A theophoric name is when the name of a God or deity is
added to it. For instance Elijah is originally “Eli” and by adding “jah’ it becomes
Elijah. Same with Jeremiah. His name is Jerem and add “iah” you get
Jeremiah.

The question is, did these names always have “iah” at the end or were these
names corrupted to give the “iah” deity recognition in Israel? There are 313
names in the Old Testament ending “iah.” It is impossible from the limited
information we have to determine which ones were altered and “iah” added
and the ones that really did end in “iah.” I am convinced that once you know
the Truth about the origin of “iah” you would never agree that this was used
by Godly parents naming their children after an Egyptian idol god. In the bible
there are male and female names ending in “iah.”

Just as a matter of clarification, I do believe there are legitimate theophoric

names in the bible in both the Old and New Testaments. An example of this is
names ending in “el”. This is the first name of God in the beginning. So when
Abraham named his son by Hagar he called him Isha-el. And when God
changed the name of Jacob he gave him Isra-el. The names are nearly the
same. We know that Israel means “as a prince hast thou power with God and
with man” (Genesis 32:28).

Then we have Beth-el which means Beth=house and El=God or house of God.
There are 92 names that end with “el” and 124 names that begin with “El.” All
of these are theophoric names I can accept because “el” is first person singular
and it means Creator God. It is first found in Genesis 1:1 as the name of the
Creator: “In the beginning God.” God here is not a generic term. It is a noun,
a name because of the “El” use.

So, just because there is an “el”

theophoric name does not give
license to claim “Yah, Jah, or Iah”
must be accepted as legitimate
theomorphic names containing the
name of God.

Anyone who says “God” is a generic word does not know anything about God.
Pay no attention to them and treat their opinion like blank paper.

Origin of Iah (iah)

Page 13 of 50
I have researched this for years. I studied all the names in the Old Testament
that ended in “iah,” all 313 of them. I studied all 129 names that began with
Yah. The 129 names that began with Jeh. And the 92 names that began with
Yah. The list is very large in trying to sort it all out. For most it has no
importance to do the research. Yah, Jah, and Iah are the same deity as YHWH
so there is no need to determine if the names are legitimate or false. Stamp
all of them legitimate and move on. But, I disagree. I studied the book of
Genesis looking for the origin of Yah, Jah, or Iah in it.

Abraham did not know a deity by this name. God appeared to him and told him
he was El-Shaddai (God Almighty). God did not say he was “Yahshaddai,
Jahshaddai, or Iahshaddai.” And when God appeared to Jacob when he had for
a pillow a stone: he said I am God Almighty (Elshaddai).

Gen_17:1 And when Abram was ninety years old and nine, the
Lord appeared to Abram, and said unto him, I am the Almighty
God; walk before me, and be thou perfect.
Gen_28:3 And God Almighty bless thee, and make thee fruitful,
and multiply thee, that thou mayest be a multitude of people;
Gen_35:11 And God said unto him, I am God Almighty: be
fruitful and multiply; a nation and a company of nations shall be
of thee, and kings shall come out of thy loins;
Gen_43:14 And God Almighty give you mercy before the man,
that he may send away your other brother, and Benjamin. If I be
bereaved of my children, I am bereaved.
Gen_48:3 And Jacob said unto Joseph, God Almighty appeared
unto me at Luz in the land of Canaan, and blessed me.

In all five cases God said his name was God Almighty or Elshaddai. This is a
theomorphic name God gave to himself. The fact he used “El” is significant to
his first name and qualified his noun name and Almighty as his adjective
description. Note that he never called himself “Elohim-almighty.”

From Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob there was no theomorphic name beginning
or ending in Yah, Jah, or Iah.

This covers a time span on earth from Adam to the death of Jacob of about
2244 years. No “iah” names of anyone in the lineage of the patriarchs and the
Godly all the way to about 1800BC. Even no names in the “overlap” years from
Osiris-iah 2500BC to 1800BC.

Page 14 of 50
On the other hand 212 names end in “el” and 49 names begin with “el.” No
names end in “iah” or “elohim.”

A look at the names from Adam to Noah reveals the name Mahalaleel ending
in El. He was the 5th from Adam. He was the first man whose name ends in
“el.” How did this come about?

God as a name was called upon by Enos Genesis 4:26 (LORD for YHWH in the
text is a fraudulent interpolation. It is impossible to have YHWH in the text at
this time.).

Then, 260 years after Enos was born his grandson Mahalaleel was born. So, in
Genesis 4:26 Enos begins calling upon the name of God. We are not given the
year of his life when he did this. But we have in the birth of his grandson
Mahalaleel when he was 260 years old the first human to bear "El" in his
name.

I conclude that he did not name his son Cainan with "El" because he had not
at that time began calling upon the name of God. It appears he began calling
upon the name God after Cainan was born and before Mahalaleel was born.
During that 70 years Enos cried out (called upon) the name of God. There is
nothing in the sacred record of any God named YHWH, Yah, Jah, or Iah. None
of these appear in any name. The first anthromorphic name Mahalaleel has
“el.”

The name Ma-ha-la-le-el ends in "el." This is the first time in human history
a man bore the name of God. El was remarkably the name of the God of Enos.
He did not know God by any other name.

No other suffix was added to any human name that bears God's name all the
way up to Abraham naming his son by Hagar Ishma-el. Why did Abraham do
this if he knew God by some other name?

God himself signifies his own name in Genesis 32:28 when he changes the
name of Jacob to Isra-el. God put his name on Jacob. His descendants were
called by the name of God. No part of the name Israel contains God's name but
"El."

Now study this scripture (2Chronicles 7:14) until the light clicks on:

Page 15 of 50
 2Ch 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall
humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from
their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive
their sin, and will heal their land.

What name of God is in the name “Israel?”

Israel is not Israyah, Israiah, Israjah.

No games here. No lying make up lies scribes here. No YHWH cult member lies
here. No rabbi, monk, or Pentecostal preacher lies here. If the Truth has no
value in this verse it has no value any where else in the bible.

If you do not understand this verse get leave the subject of the name of God
because you are not honest.

To show additionally that Jacob understood what "El" stood for, he named that
holy spot Peni-el. Saying he had seen God face to face.

A remarkable moment in the life of Jacob occurs in Genesis 33:20:

And he erected there an altar, and called it Elelohe-Israel.

The again Genesis 35:7:

And he built there an altar, and called the place Elbethel: because
there God appeared unto him, when he fled from the face of his
brother.

We can see that Jacob did not know any God by any name except “El.” If he
had known some other name for God he would have used it like:

Yahelohe-Israel;
Jahelohe-Israel;
Iahelohe-Israel;
Yahbethyah;
Jahbethjah;
Iahbethiah.

Page 16 of 50
Do not tell me the trinitarian lie that Elohim is the plural form of El. I ran into
this elohim godhead doctrine in Indonesia. A trinitarian pastor pulled this
rabbit hat trick on a couple I had baptized. Yes, I lost them back to the trinity.

El has no plural form in Paleo-Hebrew.

Elohim in Aramaic is plural in view of other gods (plural) not in view of God
himself (singular). It is inappropriate to refer to God as “elohim.” It may be
this way in the Babylonian Aramaic text but not in the Greek LXX. Every place
“elohim” appears in the Aramaic text such as in Genesis 1:1, if it is translated
straight across the board it must be: “In the beginning gods created the
heaven and the earth.” Elohim is then an interpolation. Yes, I am aware that
Gesenius and others say “elohim” is a plural of majesty. But this is only a
Trinitarian’s opinion used to assuage the fears of the word being used to deny
there is one God.

Gen 1:1 In the beginningH7225 GodH430

createdH1254 (H853) the heavenH8064 and the
earth.H776

Elohim is used 2601 times.

The subject of the plurality of God is not my

subject, but in dealing with Yah, Jah, and Iah they
are all associated with multiple gods from the
origin of “iah” with Osiris all the way down to Baal.

I want to point out that in the LXX, God in Genesis

1:1 is “theos.” and the plural is :”theoi.”

“Theos is singular. The plural is theoi.”

I am adamantly one God. I have always held that

if a word does not fit the doctrine, the doctrine will
not fit the word.
In the LXX the translators had the option of
putting “theos” or “theoi”. I am resolved on this
issue. If the Paleo-Hebrew had a plural word for God in Genesis 1:1 and the other
2600 places where “elohim” now appears in the Aramaic text, what was that word?
No one has it now or has ever had it.

Page 17 of 50
Someone between Adam and Jacob would have used a plural form to acknowledge
God. But they did not. El is the only name of God during these times.

Let me say at this junction, cross roads: that any stealing, use, adoption, false
application, dedication, or other means: to give any idol names first associated
with God is unacceptable as an excuse to say God cannot be a name because it
was used for magistrates, idols and even devil gods.

Get real. Hijacking God’s name “El” and claiming it is now judged by it’s use on the
birth certificate of an idol as “elohim” is not honesty.

No one from Adam to Jacob knew God by the names Yah, Jah, or Iah. When we
speak of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob there can only be one God we can
give a name to and that is “El”.

One of the things that makes all of this so real to me is that Jacob never named
any of his sons by any YHWH, Yah, Jah, or Iah name.

Another Junction: names beginning with “Ja, Jo, Ya, Yo, Ia, Io, cannot be used to
validate Yah, Jah, or Iah, because to do so would immediately cast those with
these names as bearing the name of an idol god. The trick is fanciful and a bit of
word magic, but I will not indulge this as a means to circumvent the overwhelming
amount of data against the idolatrous names of Yah, Jah, and Iah. I have not
considered them relevant because they would lead to the same conclusion that
Yah, Jah, and Iah are false names for God.

When I reviewed his life I found there one of the most beautiful love stories I
know. It was his beloved Rachel. She, his beloved wife, was named Rach-el. She
bore the name of his God. While there are many conflicting opinions as to the
meaning of her name, there is no doubt part of that meaning is God. My own
etymology of it is “princess of God.” I will not here break it down.

Origin of Iah (iah)

I have researched this for years. I studied all the names in the Old Testament that
ended in “iah,” all 313 of them. I studied all 129 names that began with Yah. The
129 names that began with Jeh. And the 92 names that began with Yah. The list
is very large in trying to sort it all out. For most it has no importance to do the
research. Yah, Jah, and Iah are the same deity as YHWH so there is no need to
determine if the names are legitimate or false. Stamp all of them legitimate and
move on. But, I disagree. I studied the book of Genesis looking for the origin of

Page 18 of 50
Yah, Jah, or Iah in it.

Abraham did not know a deity by this name. God appeared to him and told him he
was El-Shaddai (God Almighty). God did not say he was “Yahshaddai, Jahshaddai,
or Iahshaddai.” And when God appeared to Jacob when he had for a pillow a stone:
he said I am God Almighty (Elshaddai).

Gen_17:1 And when Abram was ninety years old and nine, the
Lord appeared to Abram, and said unto him, I am the
Almighty God; walk before me, and be thou perfect.

Gen_28:3 And God Almighty bless thee, and make thee

fruitful, and multiply thee, that thou mayest be a multitude
of people;

Gen_35:11 And God said unto him, I am God Almighty: be

fruitful and multiply; a nation and a company of nations
shall be of thee, and kings shall come out of thy loins;

Gen_43:14 And God Almighty give you mercy before the

man, that he may send away your other brother, and
Benjamin. If I be bereaved of my children, I am bereaved.

Gen_48:3 And Jacob said unto Joseph, God Almighty

appeared unto me at Luz in the land of Canaan, and blessed
me.

In all five cases God said his name was God Almighty or Elshaddai. This is a
theomorphic name God gave to himself. The fact he used “El” is significant to his
first name and qualified his noun name and Almighty as his adjective description.
Note that he never called himself “Elohim-almighty.”

From Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob there was no theomorphic name beginning or
ending in Yah, Jah, or Iah.

This covers a time span on earth from Adam to the death of Jacob of about 2244
years. No “iah” names of anyone in the lineage of the patriarchs and the Godly all
the way to about 1800BC. Even no names in the “overlap” years from Osiris-iah
2500BC to 1800BC.

On the other hand 212 names end in “el” and 49 names begin with “el.” No
names end in “iah” or “elohim.”

A look at the names from Adam to Noah reveals the name Mahalaleel ending in El.

Page 19 of 50
He was the 5th from Adam. He was the first man whose name ends in “el.” How did
this come about?

God as a name was called upon by Enos Genesis 4:26 (LORD for YHWH in the text
is a fraudulent interpolation. It is impossible to have YHWH in the text at this
time.).

Then, 260 years after Enos was born his grandson Mahalaleel was born. So, in
Genesis 4:26 Enos begins calling upon the name of God. We are not given the year
of his life when he did this. But we have in the birth of his grandson Mahalaleel
when he was 260 years old the first human to bear "El" in his name.

I conclude that he did not name his son Cainan with "El" because he had not at
that time began calling upon the name of God. It appears he began calling upon
the name God after Cainan was born and before Mahalaleel was born. During
that 70 years Enos cried out (called upon) the name of God. There is nothing in
the sacred record of any God named YHWH, Yah, Jah, or Iah. None of these
appear in any name. The first anthromorphic name Mahalaleel has “el.”

The name Ma-ha-la-le-el ends in "el." This is the first time in human history a man
bore the name of God. El was remarkably the name of the God of Enos. He did not
know God by any other name.

No other suffix was added to any human name that bears God's name all the way
up to Abraham naming his son by Hagar Ishma-el. Why did Abraham do this if he
knew God by some other name?

God himself signifies his own name in Genesis 32:28 when he changes the name
of Jacob to Isra-el. God put his name on Jacob. His descendants were called by the
name of God. No part of the name Israel contains God's name but "El."

Now study this scripture (2Chronicles 7:14) until the light clicks on:

2Ch 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall

humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their
wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin,
and will heal their land.

What name of God is in the name “Israel?”

Israel is not Israyah, Israiah, Israjah.

No games here. No lying make up lies scribes here. No YHWH cult member lies
here. No rabbi, monk, or Pentecostal preacher lies here. If the Truth has no value
in this verse it has no value any where else in the bible.

Page 20 of 50
If you do not understand this verse get leave the subject of the name of God
because you are not honest.

To show additionally that Jacob understood what "El" stood for, he named that
holy spot Peni-el. Saying he had seen God face to face.

A remarkable moment in the life of Jacob occurs in Genesis 33:20:

And he erected there an altar, and called it Elelohe-Israel.

The again Genesis 35:7:

And he built there an altar,and called the place Elbethel: because

there God appeared unto him, when he fled from the face of his
brother.

We can see that Jacob did not know any God by any name except “El.” If he
had known some other name for God he would have used it like:

Yahelohe-Israel;
Jahelohe-Israel;
Iahelohe-Israel;
Yahbethyah;
Jahbethjah;
Iahbethiah.

Do not tell me the Trinitarian lie that Elohim is the plural form of El. I ran into this
elohim godhead doctrine in Indonesia. A Trinitarian pastor pulled this rabbit hat
trick on a couple I had baptized. Yes, I lost them back to the trinity.

El has no plural form in Paleo-Hebrew. There is only a plural form in Aramaic.

Elohim in Aramaic is plural in view of other gods (plural) not in view of God himself
(singular). It is inappropriate to refer to God as “elohim.” It may be this way in the
Babylonian Aramaic text but not in the Greek LXX. Every place “elohim” appears
in the Aramaic text such as in Genesis 1:1, if it is translated straight across the
board it must be: “In the beginning gods created the heaven and the earth.”
Elohim is then an interpolation. Yes, I am aware that Gesenius and others say
“elohim” is a plural of majesty. But this is only a Trinitarian’s opinion used to
assuage the fears of the word being used to deny there is one God.

Page 21 of 50
 Gen 1:1 In the beginningH7225 GodH430
createdH1254 (H853) the heavenH8064 and the
earth.H776

Elohim is used 2601 times.

The subject of the plurality of God is not my

subject, but in dealing with Yah, Jah, and Iah they
are all associated with multiple gods from the
origin of “iah” with Osiris all the way down to Baal.

I want to point out that in the LXX, God in

Genesis 1:1 is “theos.” and the plural is :”theoi.”

“Theos is singular. The plural is theoi.”

I am adamantly one God. I have always held that if a word does not fit the
doctrine, the doctrine will not fit the word.

In the LXX the translators had the option of putting “theos” or “theoi”. I am
resolved on this issue. If the Paleo-Hebrew had a plural word for God in Genesis
1:1 and the other 2600 places where “elohim” now appears in the Aramaic text,
what was that word? No one has it now or has ever had it.

Someone between Adam and Jacob would have used a plural form to
acknowledge God. But they did not. El is the only name of God during these times.

Let me say at this junction, cross roads: that any stealing, use, adoption, false
application, dedication, or other means: to give any idol names first associated
with God is unacceptable as an excuse to say God cannot be a name because it
was used for magistrates, idols and even devil gods.

Get real. Hijacking God’s name “El” and claiming it is now judged by it’s use on
the birth certificate of an idol as “elohim” is not honesty.

No one from Adam to Jacob knew God by the names Yah, Jah, or Iah. When we
speak of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob there can only be one God we can
give a name to and that is “El”.

One of the things that makes all of this so real to me is that Jacob never named

Page 22 of 50
any of his sons by any YHWH, Yah, Jah, or Iah name.

Another Junction: names beginning with “Ja, Jo, Ya, Yo, Ia, Io, cannot be used to
validate Yah, Jah, or Iah, because to do so would immediately cast those with
these names as bearing the name of an idol god. The trick is fanciful and a bit of
word magic, but I will not indulge this as a means to circumvent the overwhelming
amount of data against the idolatrous names of Yah, Jah, and Iah. I have not
considered them relevant because they would lead to the same conclusion that
Yah, Jah, and Iah are false names for God.

When I reviewed his life I found there one of the most beautiful love stories I
know. It was his beloved Rachel. She, his beloved wife, was named Rach-el. She
bore the name of his God. While there are many conflicting opinions as to the
meaning of her name, there is no doubt part of that meaning is God. My own

etymology of it is
“princess of God.” I will
not here break it down.

The origin of “iah”

and its first use in
the land of Canaan.

Page 23 of 50
The very first time I have discovered the use of “iah” is with Osiris in Egypt.
Osiris appears in the Egyptian record about 2513BC. This is before Abraham
who was born around 2000BC. If the date 2512BC is close to accurate then
Osiris is contemporary with Ham, Shem, and Japheth. A check of the biblical
time line shows the three sons of Noah living after the flood in 2500BC. This
would mean that Osiris could very well be Ham for whom the land of Egypt
was named. Many scholars believe Osiris is a myth but I do not. What is so
remarkable about Osiris is that he is the first man of record to incorporate“iah”
and make his name “iah” theomorphic. Osiris-iah is the name of the moon god
added to his name.

As you can see the moon upon his head. This head moon image appears on all
of those who claim to descend from him and who have a birthright to be the
Pharaoh. Many of their wives also wore this symbol which can signal she also
is a descendant. There was a queen Iah (2134BC - 1991BC). She is not far
removed from Osiris. With all the data before us, we now know that “iah” is
the moon god and never was the true one God “El.” How will these be
conflated, joined, and become the same deity where “iah” is no more the moon
god but is now “El.”

Textual Translation, Conflation, and Corruption

Textual Translation: is a word for word transfer having the same meanings.
Where there is no identical word meaning in another language the meaning of
the word is transferred by use of any means possible to continue the original
intent. For instance, in one country there is no snow and people had no
knowledge about its whiteness. So the translator changed “white like snow
[Daniel 7:9] to white like wool [Psalms 147:16].” In textual translation the
translator is not free to change the meaning or intent the word is to convey.

Textual Conflation: conflate, verb, combine two or more texts into one. The
best example is the work of Origin and his Hexpla. He had six different
translations from which he hoped to make a seventh which would be the
perfect bible using the best of different translations that agreed with his own
interpretation of what was intended. Of the six all but one were translations
of the Babylonian Aramaic text of 300BC. The only text that was not was the
LXX Septuagint translated in 280BC. Why he rejected that one, the one used
by Jesus and the Apostles we do not know, unless by that time the extant
(existing) copy had already been conflated or corrupted.

Textual Corruption: Textual corruption can occurby accident, but sometimes

a copyist would deliberately alter what he has been instructed to change or

Page 24 of 50
make changes in the text based upon his own corrupt or heretical beliefs.

The procedure to check any translation is to have the original in possession

against which to check it. This is where the rabbis, monks, perverters can get
away with just about anything. The last original Paleo-Hebrew was burned up
in the temple fire in 70AD. So the original to check the 300BC Babylonian
Aramaic translation is gone. The original Paleo-Hebrew from which the LXX
Septuagint was translated was the one burned up. What remains? Only the
Aramaic of Babylon and the LXX. And the war between these two translations
has not ceased since the Council of Jamnia in 90AD. It was Rabbi Akiva Ben
Yosef who championed translating a new Greek bible from the Aramaic text
since the Paleo-Hebrew was burned up 20 years prior. Now I know I am in
areas sensitive to Jews, but since when are followers of Christ giving
preference to lies even if from a Jewish source? A note is important: Since
there has been no bible text passed down from the Tiberias Massoretic
academy from 90AD to 900AD, against what official manuscript was Rabbi
Ben Asher’s text verified letter by letter, word by word, page by page and
scroll by scroll? There was none. This is why the discovery of the Dead Sea
Scrolls was hailed as the verification of the Rabbi Asher text. There was no
other historical manuscript passed down to authenticate it. So, what happened
to all those holy preserved manuscripts that were allegedly kept secure in holy
cupboards and scroll shrines? The answer is we are believing Jewish fables.
Fables that have no way to verify except through repeated accounts in the
Mishnah, Babylonian Talmud, and other books which themselves are
unverifiable.

Jesus and the Apostles used only the LXX Septuagint

Jesus and the Apostles used only the LXX. They never quoted one verse from
the Aramaic. While there are some similar textual agreements with verses in
the Aramaic text, this is owing only to the fact that in these text the Aramaic
agrees with the LXX and not that the LXX agrees with the Aramaic.

In fact, Jesus and the Apostles quoted from the LXX 315 times according to
scholars.

Page 25 of 50
Jacob to Moses

There is about 373 years from the death of Jacob and the burning bush of
Moses.

We know Jesus could read Greek because he was given the Greek Scroll by
the Greek name Isaias. And from that Greek Scroll he read Isaias 61:1-2.

Luk 4:17 And there was delivered unto him the book of
the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book,
he found the place where it was written,

Luk 4:18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath
anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent
me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the
captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at
liberty them that are bruised,

Luk 4:19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord.

You can compare this to the LXX Brenton text today:

1 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me; he has
sent me to preach glad tidings to the poor, to heal the broken in heart, to
proclaim liberty to the captives, and recovery of sight to the blind;

2 to declare the acceptable year of the Lord.

You can compare this to the Babylonian Aramaic:

Isa 61:1 The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me; because the
Lord hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the
meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to
proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the
prison to them that are bound;
Isa 61:2 To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord.

Page 26 of 50
You can see “recovery of sight to the blind” is missing in the Aramaic text. You
can see there is a difference in “healing the brokenhearted” and “binding up
the brokenhearted.” And: “to opening of the prison to them that are bound”
totally missing in the Greek LXX.

These are excused under the banner of “variant” passages. The fact is it proves
there was a great disparity between the translation of the Babylonian Aramaic
and the LXX. Jesus chose the LXX over the Aramaic. All of the Apostles
likewise. Now we would excuse all of this away as just a minor difference
between the text, but the rabbis did not see it that way. They preached that
even if one jot or tittle was changed in any letter, any word, on any line, on
any page, in any section the whole scroll was corrupt and must be thrown
away.

The rabbis became more and more resentful of the Apostles using the LXX
to prove the Messiaship of Jesus that they accused them of hijacking their
bible. Now why would they say this if their bible was the Babylonian Aramaic?
They said it because the LXX was the translation used in all synagogues.
Even the sign posted at the entry of the temple was in Greek and not Aramaic.

The LXX was the complete cannon of

Scripture from 280BC until 90AD
where it would be rejected totally
and a new Greek invented to have a
new cannon.

Because of the deep hatred toward

the Apostles and Christian (calling
them “ha-mimin”) the rabbis
invented a curse prayer that was
recited every week:

Birkat
haMinim
This was a curse against Christians
although that is denied today. But in
90AD there was no other religious
group in Israel preaching the
Kingdom message except Christian
descendants of the Apostles.

Page 27 of 50
 And the prayer says “in our days”
which positioned the curse to be
immediately during the life time of
those constructing it and chanting it in
synagogue every week.

What is my point? It is simply this: that these same rabbis no longer

wanted the LXX translation that had been used since 280BC until 90AD (350
years). This translation was used to preach the Kingdom they were now
cursing calling upon the YHWH deity.

Did John the Baptist quote from the LXX or the Aramaic?

Mat 3:3 For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet

Esaias, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness,

Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.

Quoted from the LXX:

Isa 40:3 The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare

ye the way of the Lord, make straight the paths of our
God.

What does the Massoretic Aramaic say:

Isa 40:3 The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness,

Prepare ye the way of the LORD, make straight in the desert
a highway for our God.

While it may appear on the face of it the translations are saying the same
thing, this is not what we are judging. We are judging if John quoted from the
LXX or the Babylonian Aramaic? John specifically says “Isaias” which is Greek.
He did not say Isayah or any name like “Iasiah” ending with “iah” which is the
same as Yah and Jah. The wording is also in error. Paths is not a highway. This
prophecy was to be fulfilled at the banks of the Jordan river and the only true
fulfillment is Jesus walking the path to this baptism place.

So, at the 90AD Pharisee rabbi Council of Jamnia (Also called Jabneh in
Samaritan, and Yavneh), the rabbis hired a recent apostate from Christianity

Page 28 of 50
named Aquila (not Paul’s Aquila). This Aquila was expelled from the churches
for astrology with the Scriptures. He went to Rabbi Akiva Ben Yosef and
converted to his brand of Judaism. He became an enemy of the Christians. The
rabbis did not object to his occult corruptions Akiva himself a noted redactor
of the Sefer Yetzirah (a mystic book). Aquila was supposedly an expert in
Aramaic, Greek, and Latin. So they hired him to make a new Greek translation
from the Aramaic one they had. He could not make a Greek translation from
the Paleo-Hebrew because it was burned up 20 years prior in Jerusalem. Aquila
we are told completed his “literal” translation around 125-130AD. It was after
this the Aramaic bible disappeared from the earth and was never seen again.
The Greek of Aquila was used all the way up to about 1000AD when it was
replaced by then ew invented and compiled Massoretic text of Rabbi Aaron Ben
Asher.

Why is this important history to know about the bible?

Because the LXX that was considered holy Scripture, the righteous cannon
of the sacred books, would come under intense hatred for the next three
hundred years. It would be corrupted over and over and then reported to be
in such a disarray and full of errors that it would be cast aside by Christians.
Only the Eastern Greek Orthodox church retained the LXX. But also because
of the slander against it by critical rabbis and scholars now also
consults the Babylonian Aramaic.

Now, I am expecting you to do some research on your own to verify the

highlights of my account of the translations of the bible text. If you do not, do
not judge a single word of about anything in this bible study. And if you have
done some research do not deny the facts presented if you choose to trash me
like the Rabbis did to the bible Jesus and the Apostles used.

Conflation still continues with hundreds of modern translations.

Let me make a note here: Jesus inspired the New Testament to be written in
Greek not in Babylonian Aramaic. This ought to mean something. Also, this is
not about the New Testament. This bible study is about the Old Testament
Babylonian Aramaic and the use of “iah” in 136 places. And this being
connected to YHWH, Jah, and Yah. The New Testament does not have these
errors. An attempt to impregnate the New Testament with LORD and then
YHWH and then Jehovah is biblical rape.

Origin the conflator

Page 29 of 50
Origin constructed a parallel bible. It had six columns. 1)Aramaic; 2)Secunda
Aramaic;3)Aquila; 4)Synnachus;5)LXX;6)Theodoton. His hope was to create
#7 which would be to him the perfect bible. But he failed to produce it.

I offered the example of Origin as a man who many believe conflated and
corrupted the bible text. What were those translations?

The original Babylonian Aramaic, the Secunda Aramaic, Aquila Greek

translated from the two Aramaic text, the Synnachus Greek translation from
the two Aramaic text, the Theodoton Greek text translated from the two
Aramaic text, and the LXX Greek text which at this time had already been
conflated with the Greek of Theodoton.

The LXX we have now such as the Sir Lancelot Brenton are translated from
the conflated Greek LXX with Theodoton Greek.

The original LXX disappeared before the time of Origin. If he had it, there
would have been no need for the other three Greek translations from the two
Aramaic text.

We know the LXX is conflated by the interpolation of YHWH or LORD in the

same places found in the Aramaic translations. While we would expect Kurios
in many hundreds of places we would not expect to see it beginning in Genesis
2:4 where YHWH would have been impossible to exist. And we would not find
Kuriosin184 more places in the book of Genesis. The reason for this challenge
is that rabbis, scholars, and even occult mystics claim this name was not
known until the burning bush event in Exodus 6:3:

Exo 6:3 And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and

unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name
YHWH was I not known to them.

Extraneous efforts to change the words “was I not known to them” into “I was
not fully known to them by my name YHWH,” is an ingenious conflation of
itself (David Bernard of the UPCI uses this lie. He has inspired thousands of
Yahweh cult members to use this lie. They quote him.).

Interpolation into the sacred record a contradiction via a perverted

interpretation is the same as corrupting the Word of God.

Page 30 of 50
It is necessary for the tetragrammaton cults to alter this text because it would
prove all the scriptures prior to this event that have YHWH have been
conflated, corrupted, and interpolated. I am of that persuasion. You can
believe all the liars, all the conflators, all the perjured scribes, and others who
had a hand in this taking out and adding to the Word of God. But you will
never be able to honestly erase or change the facts as I have laid them out.

My purpose of going into these bible text and expose the corruptions is to
attack the use of Yah, Jah, and Iah as names of God when in fact they are all
idolatrous names. I have prior presented the unrefutable fact that the “iah”
theomorphic addition to names began with Osiris. No one can get into the bible
a time before this hermeneutic example a name that incorporates the name
of the moon god. And no one can honestly get YHWH into the book of Genesis
and all the way to the burning bush without adulterating and defiling the
sacred record.

The scriptural record of the migration of the “iah”

anthromorphic use from Egypt into the land of
Israel.

None of the descendants of Jacob had this name

addition. None of the seed of Essau had it. None of the
men of Moab had it.

A look at anthromorphic names in the land of Canaan would indicate the

use of “bel and baal.”

This name “Bel is cognate with Baal” from Babylon throughout the fertile
crescent. They are the same god, the same deity. And, he had a wife, a
consort. Even Yahweh had a consort, a wife.

The Bel and Baal use in

the land o f
Canaan shows the lands
of Essau and the land
of Moab were first
influenced from Babylon
and not from Egypt.

This will also make a division between the worshipers of Baal and the
worshipers of El, Adonay, Elshaddai, and Ehyeh asher Ehyeh. It gives us a

Page 31 of 50
behind the scene look at why there was so much hatred between the people
of the gods and the people of God.

We will not here explore into the atrocious bloody rituals to the gods such as
baby sacrifices, as compared to the sacrifices to a loving, kind, peaceful,
respectful, and honorable God. The challenge of Elias on Mount Carmel brings
this out: “if Baal be God follow him, but if Adonay be God follow him.”

Yes, I know the conflated text has YHWH here as if Elias actually pronounced
that name, but it is all biblical rape. The God, the El, of Elias was the El of
Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and it was this God by his name El, by which Elias
called up to heaven:

1Ki 18:36 And it came to pass at the time of the offering of

the evening sacrifice, that Elijah the prophet came near, and
said, Lord God (Adonay El) of Abraham, Isaac, and of
Israel, let it be known this day that thou art El in Israel, and
that I am thy servant, and that I have done all these things
at thy word.

Elias called upon the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Three men whose only
God was Elshaddai (God Almighty). Elias did not call upon any god named
YHWH or pronounced Jehovah, Yahweh, Yah, Jah, or Iah.

I find it utterly impossible that Abraham was in Egypt for the greater part of
a year and yet he did not know the names of the gods there. Names of gods
he would reject and not accept as equivalent to his God Elshaddai. Names he
would not attach to the his son by Hagar or his son by Sarah. By adding “el”
to the names of these two boys shows he did not accept the anthromorphic
deity known in Egypt as “iah” the moon god.

You can ignore this snapshot of biblical history but to do so to force the
acceptance of YHWH, Yah, Jah, or Iah is not only disgusting it is proof of an
apostate mind.

“Iah (iah)” made his entry into Israel but not by the names of any of the
men from Adam to the birth of Edomite Duke Aliah (1Chronicles 15:1).

I have researched the Old Testament to discover the first names where the
anthromorphic “iah” was attached. The order they are found in the Scriptures
are:

Page 32 of 50
Ajah - Genesis 36:24 (son of Zibeon, same Zibeon in 1Chronicles 1:40));
Aiah - 1Chronicles 1:40 (son of Zibeon);
Aliah - 1Chronicles 1:51; (His name is spelled “Alvah in Genesis 36:40 son
of Essau brother to Timnah and Jetheth);

Aiah - 2 Samuel 3:7 (name of the mother of Saul’s concubine Rizpah).

The importance of this history of the transfer of the anthromorphic moon god
name “iah” is that Edom is the origin of the idolatrous adoption. Aiah (the
woman) slips into this morphing. Because there is no data on her I will pass
from her to the greater testimony of Ajiah the son of Zibeon also spelled Aiah.

Zibeon was a Duke of Edom. He is listed in 1Chronicles1:51 as the second

son of Essau. Zibeon named his son “Alvah” as found in Genesis 36:40. How
his name became “Aliah” in 1Chronicles 1:51 must be tied to some
bible perverter. I need go no further to prove the path of transfer of “iah”
from Osiris-iah to Israel is through the idolatrous people of Edom.

Because of the corruption of the Babylonian Aramaic text with the interpolation
of YHWH in 6,510 places it is very well impossible to know who and why the
Egyptian anthromorphic “iah” was added to the beginning and end of names.
This inability to document is owing to the fact the original Paleo-Hebrew does
not exist to cross check the names. But this we do know without any research
past Osiris-iah, the name “iah” is the name of the moon god.

And to suppose that Israelites would add this idolatrous name to their children
is shocking. There is no need to pull out any scripture from the King James Old
Testament in an attempt to refute this. Because the KJV Old Testament was
translated from the Rabbi Aaron Ben Asher Babylonian Aramaic restored text.

We will want to check instead with the LXX that Jesus and the Apostles used.
The one at that time which was the perfect Word of God. The original cannon
of the Old Testament. And in the LXX we will not find a single name with this
Egyptian anthromorphic moon god “iah.” Not one.

Greek Septuagint LXX distortations and lies

The internet is cluttered with thousands of negative pages of commentary anti

LXX. All of them without exception praise the Babylonian Aramaic. They want
the LXX destroyed worse than Rabbi Akiva Ben Yosef. There are a handful of

Page 33 of 50
scholars who are honest and want to understand why YHWH is found in the
Babylonian Aramaic text and put into the KJV with the code LORD. They want
to know why it is not found one time in the LXX? But, they are switching sides
now and claiming the original LXX did have YHWH in it.

When I first began to study the LXX 40 years

ago I was amazed that YHWH was missing in
the New Testament. I was at that
time a YHWH believer. I had not
been delivered yet from believing in
that Jewish deity. So, I was
interested in why it was missing.
When I researched I found many
hundreds of book s, m ai n l y
commentaries and lexicons that said
the divine sacred name YHWH should
be restored in the New Testament in
every place the Old Testament is
quoted and LORD (code for YHWH)
was found in the corresponding
Scriptures.

I was so excited to obtain from the

Jehovah’s Witnesses their bible “New World Translation” (Copyright 1950). I
discovered that Jehovah was restored 237 times in the New Testament where
the text was quoted from the Old Testament scriptures. My KJV had LORD
in these verses and this signified Jehovah. (From 1968-1980 I was so happy).
Someone had already thought as I did, that YHWH belonged in the New
Testament but for some reason the LXX translators put Kurios instead of
YHWH. They didn’t even put Adonay the alternate reading, which we were told
was in the margin. The Greek has letters to spell out Adonay. But if you search
the internet for this you will likely not find it. I searched and searched and
could not find it. So, I decided to make my own image to demonstrate that if
the 70 translators of the LXX were of the fable that Adonay was written in the
margin to keep a reader from accidently pronouncing the name of God, they
did not continue the fable.

I then was shocked to discover that even if the LXX translators had purposely
omitted YHWH and the alternate Adonai, why would the Apostles not use this
word since it was not considered using God’s name in vain to pronounce? I
could come up with a lot of variable answers but I could not run from the fact
they used Kurios exactly as the LXX translators did who themselves did not
write Adonai in Greek letters.

Page 34 of 50
After years of believing in YHWH I was completely tetragrammaton free in
1980. Prior to this I had read a new scholarly report that old LXX fragments
were found that had YHWH in the Greek text in Paleo-Hebrew letters. This was
presented as fact the original LXX did contain YHWH in the 237 places the
Jehovah’s Witnesses had interpolated Jehovah. Except this scholar said the
name should not be Jehovah but Yahweh. This led the YHWH tetragrammaton
cults to put out new bibles containing Yahweh in the 237 places. I was struck
with a major question.

Were the Greek scraps from the original LXX or from one of the conflated
copies of the Greek by Aquila, Symmachus, or Theodoton? Noone could or did
answer this. Were these scraps from the original or copy thereof or from a copy
of a corrupted one? I have major problems with these new claims by people
of the Yahweh cults. Since 1990the information on the internet and especially
Wikipedia has been corrupted by hundreds of YHWH cult people. I corrected
some of the lies on Wikipedia but within 24 hours they were deleted by YHWH
cult members. I gave up trying to correct all the lies.

We do not have copies of these three new Greek translations from the
Babylonian Aramaic source to see if they contained YHWH in Paleo-Hebrew
letters.

I want to point out here that Aquila, Symmachus, or Theodoton absolutely did
not translate any of the New Testament. They hated the New Testament. They
were not Christians. They opposed the Christians using the LXX to prove Jesus
was the Messias. So what these men translated in their bible text from the
Babylonian Aramaic cannot be trusted or used to prove the original LXX had
the tetragrammaton in it, nor that the original Paleo-Hebrew had it.

If they did in fact have YHWH in paleo-Hebrew letters in 6,510 places this
would have come from the Babylonian Aramaic text. They did not have the
Paleo-Hebrew as it was burned up in 70AD. And to claim they copied YHWH
from the LXX for their translation is simply untenable and cannot be proven.

So, all this said: there is absolutely no proof the New Testament had YHWH in
it at all. And there is no proof other than clever manufactured doctored
manuscripts that the New Testament Greek or the Latin of the book of Romans
had YHWH or Adonay in them in the 237 places claimed by the Jehovah’s
Witnesses.

It is needful to cover this information before we examine the Old Testament

names in the genealogy of Jesus in Matthew and Luke to see if “iah” the moon

Page 35 of 50
god anthromorphic name came over from the Old Testament Babylonian
Aramaic.

It is not my fault the idolatrous trend to name a child using the name of an
idol god began in antiquity in Edom. I am not responsible for this practice to
increase and be accepted in Israel. Names are a trend. They come into favor
and the unique sounding gets loved.

How much of the use of “iah” was just trend we do not know. But we know
this, the meaning of “iah” as the moon never ceased. Even if they did not
know it was first used by Osiris to mean “moon god” they were still in violation

of idolatry prohibitions:

Exo 23:13 And in all things that I have said unto you be
circumspect: and make no mention of the name of other
gods, neither let it be heard out of thy mouth.

One hundred and thirty six times out of the mouth of the mother and father
the name of a false god was added to their child. These 136 children lived all
of their life bearing the name of a false god. Not a single one of them bore the
anthromorphic name “el” as Cainan attached to Mahalaleel in Genesis 5:12,
Abraham attached to Ishmael in Genesis 16:11, and God attached to Jacob in
his name Israel in Genesis 32:28. I never read one place where God told
anyone to name their child “iah” after the order of Osiris-iah in Egypt.

This all happened because the Israelites went awhoring after other gods and
with no respect or honor to God they used “iah” cognate names of other gods.
The use of “iah” was the evidence of this because out of their mouth they
would pronounce the name of a false god contrary to Exodus 23:13.

Because of the loss of the original Paleo-Hebrew text we cannot determine

which names actually ended in “iah” or this was added by perverted scribes in
the Babylonian Aramaic translation. We know this one fact, “iah” was not
transferred to the LXX Greek Septuagint used by Jesus and the Apostles and
first Christians.

Page 36 of 50
 The New Testament And
The Absence of “iah.”

When I first debated the

YHWH cult in Conyers,
Georgia in 1993, I knew I
had to deal with “Yah, Jah,
and Iah.” I knew I had to
be prepared. A lot of the
information in this study was
gathered between 1992 and
1993 during my time of
preparation for the six hour
debate. I did not put all of
this information before the
300 + attendees. I was not
there to teach them, I was
there to defeat them. I hit
only the

highlights. In fact, after attending the debate I realized none of them were
of the intellectual ability to even comprehend the information. Even now as
I put it in writing, I am sure that few will even grasp the significance of my
research and my analysis. They are blinded by traditions, ignorance, and
lack of love for the Truth. To receive Truth a person must first be honest.
Lacking this basic virtue they will reject the Truth because a personal level
of love for it has not been born in them. We will now turn to the sacred
record given to us by Matthew and Luke and the Old Testament names
of those who in the Babylonian Aramaic text of 300BC.

Matthew names will be listed with their Babylonian Aramaic spelling in the
Massoretic Old Testament (as used in the King James Version).

Jesus Christ Aram

David Aminadab
Abraham Naasson
Isaac Salmon
Jacob Booz
Judas Obed
Phares Jesse
Esrom David Solomon Roboam

Page 37 of 50
Abia (Babylonian Aramaic has Joseph
Abijah) Matthat
Asa Levi
Melchi
Josaphat
Janna
Joram
Joseph
Ozias (Babylonian Aramaic has Mattathias
Josiah) Amos
Joatham Naum
Achaz Esli
Ezekias Nagge
Manasse Maath
s Amon Mattathias
Josias (Babylonian Aramaic has Semei
Josiah) Joseph
Juda
Jechonias (Babylonian Aramaic has
Joanna
Jechoniah)
Rhesa
Salathiel Zorobabel (the only “bel” name)
Zorobab Salathiel
el Abiud Neri
Eliakim Melchi
Azor Addi
Sadoc Cosam
Achim Elmodam
Eliud Er
Eleazar Jose
Matthan Eliezer
Jacob(Which God changed to Jorim
Israel) Joseph Jesus Christ Matthat
Zacharias
Other names used in the New Levi
Testament: Simeon
Juda,
Jeremy (Babylonian Aramaic has Joseph
Jeremiah). Jonan
Isaias (Babylonian Aramaic has Eliakim
Isaiah). Melea
Zacharias (Babylonian Menan
Aramaic Mattatha
Nathan (Bathsheba his mother)
The Luke genealogy names: David
Jesse
Obed (Ruth his mother) Booz
Jesus Christ (Mary his mother)

Page 38 of 50
Salmon
Naasson
Aminadab
Aram
Esrom
Phares
Juda (Leah his mother)
Jacob
Isaac (Sarah his mother)
Abraham
Thara
Nachor
Saruch
Ragau
Phalec
Heber
Sala
Cainan
Arphaxad
Sem Noe
Lamech
Mathusala
Enoch
Jared
Maleleel
Cainan
Enos
Seth (Eve his mother)
Adam

There are no “iah” names in the genealogy of Jesus. The “bel” anthromorphic
name in that of Zerubabel has no bearing on our discussion. Nor, are any roots
of the other names. Our point of focus here is YHWH and it’s cognates Yah,
Jah, and Iah.

Only when the LXX Greek Septuagint is thrown into the garbage bin and the
Babylonian Aramaic revived out of the abyss, can YHWH be connected to the
name of Jesus using a clever system of fraud.

I have been teaching for many years that the name of Jesus did not originate
upon the earth. No one had it before Gabriel brought it to earth. Using the
Babylonian Aramaic text and calling it “biblical Hebrew” to give Jesus a name
delineated from Joshua, Yehoshua, or Yeshua is corruption of the most holy

Page 39 of 50
name of God. The name of Jesus was never pronounced on any lips or tongues
until Gabriel pronounced it to Joseph and Mary.

This name was then written down in Paleo-Hebrew letters, Greek letters, and
Latin letters. The one name of Jesus was not translated. It was transvocalized
using the alphabets of Paleo-Hebrew, Greek and Latin. In all three the name
is pronounced Jesus. Do not even try to go to the Aramaic to prove this wrong.

This conforms to Zecharias 14:9:

Zec 14:9 And the LORD shall be king over all the earth: in
that day shall there be one LORD, and his name one.

One name to be known the same pronunciation all over the world.

This agrees with Acts 4:12:

Act 4:12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there

is none other name under heaven given among men,

whereby we must be saved.

This agrees with Philippians 2:10:

Php 2:10 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow,
of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under
the earth.

There are many other verses that testify to Jesus name only. My choice is
1John 4:3:

1Jn 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus
Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that
spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should
come; and even now already is it in the world.

I will not frustrate this verse with the clever word magic of those who deny the
intent of John’s words. He said “Jesus Christ is come in the flesh.” This is

Page 40 of 50
Jesus Christ God in heaven before he was manifested in the flesh. He was not
Jesus Christ because of his birth. His name Jesus Christ did not begin in
Bethlehem. God’s name was Jesus Christ in heaven before “he came in the
flesh.” His name was Jesus before Mary conceived. The angel to the shepherds
called him Christ the Lord (Luke2:11). This is what we must confess or we are
antichrist.

The name of the Father

The YHWH cults say the tetragrammaton is the name of the Father.
The rabbis say this Father is YHWH their God.

Rabbi Aaron Ben Asher vowel marked YHWH so that it is pronounced

Jehovah. The dictionaries and lexicons say YHWH is the national God of
Israel.

The same collection of books that said YHWH was Jehovah are now saying it
is Yahweh.

The King James Version has Jehovah in seven places (Genesis 22:14;
Exodus 6:3;Exodus 17:15;Judges 6:24;Psalms 83:18;Isaias12:2;and
Isaias26:4). Are all of these lies? If Yahweh is God’s true name then yes,
seven lies.

According to the dictionaries, hallelujah and alleluia mean: Praise the Lord,
Praise Yah, Praise Jah, praise Jehovah, and praise Yahweh. The root of Jah and
ia is claimed to be the letters YH which is Yah the first syllable of Yahweh.
Yahweh is claimed to be the LORD all in caps in 6,510 places in the King
James Version of the bible.

No where in all of these reference books do they say the name of the Father
is Jesus.

Not one place.

Yet Jesus said he came in the Father’s name. If YHWH was the name of the
Father how come he was not born with the name YHWH?

Page 41 of 50
 John 5:43 I am come in my Father's name, and ye
receive me not: if another shall come in his own name,
him ye will receive.

Jesus said he manifested the Father’s name to his disciples:

John 17:6 I have manifested thy name unto the men

which thou gavest me out of the world: thine they were, and
thou gavest them me; and they have kept thy word.

Joh 17:26 And I have declared unto them thy name, and
will declare it: that the love wherewith thou hast loved me
may be in them, and I in them.

Jesus declared himself to be the Father as God within him:

Joh 14:9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time
with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that
hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou
then, Shew us the Father?

If indeed Jesus was the Father as he declared, then the Father in him bore
the name Jesus Christ for 33 ½ years.

This totally negates all the claims about YHWH being the name of the Father.
It cancels out all the claims of Yah, Jah, and Iah being cognate names to the
name of Jesus. And it settles once and for all that the anthromorphic name
Osiris-iah will never be in any way connected to the name of Jesus.

The name of Jesus Christ is tetragrammaton free.

While“iah” was transferred from Egypt through Edom into Israel and was used
throughout the nation for several hundred years, God did not allow it to cross
over into the New Testament. None of the Apostles had a name ending in
“iah.” Only one name is supreme in the New Testament. That name is Jesus
Christ.

The name of God

Page 42 of 50
God has had several names but only one salvation name (Acts4:12). The
list of his names as they are found in scriptural order are:

EL (God); Elshaddai (God

Almighty); Adonay (Lord);
Ehyeh asher Ehyeh (Ehjeh
asher Ehjeh–Deliverer).

The real truth of the

burning bush name given
to Moses:

Exodus 3:14 - God did not say “I AM that I AM.” He did not say my name is
“Hayah asher Hayah” as reported by Strong’s in H#1961. Who gave the rabbis
the authority to take out “Ehyeh asher Ehyeh” and insert this later Syrian
word “hayah”?

In the King James Version Adonai is

corrupted into LORD and in Strong’s
this is referred to the
tetragrammaton YHWH. This is an
example how in many hundreds of
places Adonai (Lord) was perverted
into YHWH.

Moses was given Ehyeh asher

Ehyeh (the letter “Y” is pronounced
like a “J.”

Now what was the purpose of this

name?

It was a name for deliverance “I will bring you out” (Exodus 3:17 and 6:6).
Usually when a statement follows a name that is its meaning.

Mat 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou
shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his
people from their sins.

Page 43 of 50
Ehyeh was a deliverance name but not a soul salvation name.

None of the prior names were soul salvation names.

God simply means Creator.

Elshaddai simply means Almighty God.
Adonai simply means Lord with emphasis on being a sovereign King.
Ehyeh simply means Deliverer.
Jesus simply means Savior.
Christ means Anointed King.

It is only in the name “Ehyeh” and “yeh” that we get a glimpse of the salvation
name to come on the lips of Gabriel. Phonetically Jesus is “Yehshas” [Jehshas]
in Paleo-Hebrew.

Throughout the Old Testament, God is simply God. When he is called “Lord
God” it simply means “King God” or “Sovereign God” with emphasis there is
none greater.

This usage continued over into the New Testament:

Matthew 4:7-10; 22:37; Mark 22:37;
Luke 1:16, 68;
Acts 2:39 (very important);
2Corinthians 1:3; 11:31;
Revelation 4:8 (holy, holy, holy Lord God Almighty)
Revelation 11:17 (Lord God Almighty); Revelation
15:3 (Lord God Almighty); Revelation 16:7 (Lord
God Almighty); Revelation 18:8 (Lord God);
Revelation 19:6 (Lord God);
Revelation 21:22 (Lord God Almighty);
Revelation 22:5-6 (Lord God).

The words “Lord and God” are found in 116 verses in the New Testament and
not one time is a reference to a deity named YHWH, Jehovah, or Yahweh. In
every single case it refers back to the very first names of God given in the
book of Genesis. There is only one difference. Then they did not know the
salvation name of Jesus Christ. In the New Testament Jesus is called Lord and
God (see the confession of Apostle Thomas in John 20:28. To call Jesus Lord

Page 44 of 50
and not mean by this Adonai, is to reduce him from his position as God to that
of some earthly office that has nothing to do with divinity. To us there is one
Lord, one Faith, and one Baptism (Ephesians 4:5). We need a revelation of this
verse to understand the name of Jesus Christ is the name of God.

We must now make a declaration: Jesus was God’s name in heaven before he
came to earth. It was not a name from the earth or taken from the name
Joshua, Yehoshua, or even YHWH or Jehovah or Yahweh. It was never
pronounced on earth until given to Joseph and Mary.

After its revelation it was transvocalized in Paleo-Hebrew, Greek, and Latin.

And in each case pronounced Jesus. The construction of the letters was an
attempt to transfer the pronunciation. And yes, there was a “J” sound option
for the letter “I” in Paleo-Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, and Latin. The charts to
show this will be Appendix “B.”

This heavenly name of God is verified in 1John 4:1-4. We are told we must
confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh. For us to confess this we must
believe he was Jesus Christ as God before he came in the flesh. To interpret
this verse any differently is to take away the persistence of Christ as God in
heaven. If anyone does this they are an antichrist.

There are many scriptures to prove that the name of Jesus is the name of God.
I will simply end this with this verse:

Rom_14:11 For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every

knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to
God.

To whom you bow your knee is God. This verse is speaking of bowing to Jesus
Christ. If not, then it is idolatry to bow to Jesus. For if he is not God he is not
worthy that any bow to him.

Jesus, name above all names.

Bishop G. Reckart
Mount Jesus
Prenza, Balamban, Cebu, Philippines 6041
January 21, 2020

Page 45 of 50
Appendix “A”

I am Mesha, son of Chemosh-gad,[25] king of Moab, the Dibonite. My father

reigned over Moab thirty years, and I have reigned after my father. And I have
built this sanctuary for Chemosh in Karchah, a sanctuary of salvation, for he
saved me from all aggressors, and made me look upon all mine enemies with
contempt. Omri was king of Israel, and oppressed Moab during many days, and
Chemosh was angry with his aggressions. His son succeeded him, and he also
said, I will oppress Moab. In my days he said, Let us go, and I will see my
desire upon him and his house, and Israel said, I shall destroy it for ever. Now
Omri took the land of Madeba, and occupied it in his day, and in the days of
his son, forty years. And Chemosh had mercy on it in my time. And I built
Baal-meon and made therein the ditch, and I built Kiriathaim. And the men of
Gad dwelled in the country of Ataroth from ancient times, and the king of
Israel fortified Ataroth. I assaulted the wall and captured it, and killed all
the warriors of the city for the well-pleasing of Chemosh and Moab, and I
removed from it all the spoil, and offered it before Chemosh in Kirjath; and I
placed therein the men of Siran, and the men of Mochrath. And Chemosh said
to me, Go take Nebo against Israel, and I went in the night and I fought
against it from the break of day till noon, and I took it: and I killed in all seven
thousand men, but I did not kill the women and maidens, for I devoted them
to Ashtar-Chemosh; and I took from it the vessels of YHVH, and offered
them before Chemosh. And the king of Israel fortified Jahaz, and occupied
it, when he made war against me, and Chemosh drove him out before me, and
I took from Moab two hundred men in all, and placed them in Jahaz, and took
it to annex it to Dibon. I built Karchah the wall of the forest, and the wall of
the Hill. I have built its gates and I have built its towers. I have built the
palace of the king, and I made the prisons for the criminals within the wall.
And there were no wells in the interior of the wall in Karchah. And I said to all
the people, ‘Make you every man a well in his house.’ And I dug the ditch for
Karchah with the chosen men of Israel. I built Aroer, and I made the road
across the Arnon. I took Beth-Bamoth for it was destroyed. I built Bezer for it
was cut down by the armed men of Daybon, for all Daybon was now loyal; and
I reigned from Bikran, which I added to my land. And I built Beth-Gamul, and
Beth-Diblathaim, and Beth Baal-Meon, and I placed there the poor people of
the land. And as to Horonaim, the men of Edom dwelt therein, on the descent
from old. And Chemosh said to me, Go down, make war against Horonaim, and
take it. And I assaulted it, And I took it, for Chemosh restored it in my days.
Wherefore I made.... ...year...and I....

Page 46 of 50
Appendix “B”

The purpose of these images is to prove there was a “J” sound all the way back
to Egypt 2500BC. Although the actual letter to represent that sound was not
created until 1524AD when Gian Giorgio Trissino, an Italian Renaissance
grammarian became known as the father of the letter “J.” It took several years
for the change from the letter “I” to adopt this symbol. If anyone tells you the
letter “J” came from French romance language do not believe it. The letter “J”
in English was a semi-vowel and can be used as the letter “Y” and also the
letter “I”. When “I” is a consonant it was pronounced as the letter “J.” So in
the King James 1611 the name Iesus was pronounced Jesus. Otherwise the
name would be pronounced I-esus which was never done at any time. A look
through these alphabet charts will show the letter “J” sound always existed
even if there was no separate symbol for it. The name of Jesus could be
pronounced Jesus in Paleo-Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, and Latin.
A lie that has captured thousands is that there could be no name Jesus when
he was born because there was no letter “J.” What these YHWH deceivers
never told anyone is that the letter “J” sound was also an option sound in all
the alphabets. Look at the charts below. You can see that in Paleo-Hebrew that
goes back to 1400BC the letter symbol called Yodh with the hand symbol could

Page 47 of 50
be pronounced three ways and one of them was with the “J” sound. The rule
was, that when “I” was followed by a vowel it had the consonant sound of “J”.
Iesus has the “I” followed by a vowel and so the “I” had the “J” sound
pronunciation.

Page 48 of 50
Appendix “C”

What about the two men named Jesus in Acts 13:6 and Colossians 4:11? If the
name of Jesus came from heaven how could these men be born with that
name before Jesus was born?

In Acts 13:6 there is a man named Barjesus. But that is not his birth name.
His birth name was Elymas Acts 13:8. He was called Elymas the sorcerer. So
he was a male witch. How he came by the name Barjesus we do not know. But
to say he was born with this name before Jesus was born is false. His birth
name was Elymas.

In Colossians 4:11 the Scripture says: and Jesus which is called Justus. His
name was not Jesus it was Justus in Acts 18:7. How he came by the name
Jesus we do not know but that was not his birth name. His birth name was
Justus. To say he was named Jesus before Jesus was born is simply not true.

These two cases cannot disprove the name of Jesus came from heaven. We
know it came from heaven because Gabriel came from heaven. And who sent
Gabriel since angels do not act on their own authority.

Here is what Gabriel said to Zacharias in Luke 1:19: “

I am Gabriel, that stand in the presence of God; and am
sent to speak unto thee.”
I think it is clear he was standing in the presence of God and God sent him
with his own name. Yes, God named himself. He sent Gabriel to tell Joseph
and Mary to call the son to be born Jesus because that is the name of God
in heaven.

Page 49 of 50
Appendix “D”

There are many deceiving YHWH cults spreading false information about the
name of Jesus.

Basically they say the name of Jesus could not have been used or pronounced
Jesus when he was born because there was no letter “J” in the alphabets. And
Jesus is an English name, it is not Hebrew. With these two clever lies they
convert people to a false Aramaic name and call it Hebrew.

I am going to post the images below because they give the basic reasons why
the King James Iesus is pronounced Jesus. While Ken points to the French
language, the rules of grammar he is using go all the way back to Paleo-
Hebrew, Greek, and Latin. Notice the rule: When the letter “I” stands as a
consonant, the pronunciation shifts (glides) to the “J” pronunciation. The
letter “J” was developed as an independent glide from the letter “I” by adding
a hook on the bottom. I is before J in the alphabet because of this.
The ru l e of
grammar is, if a
vowel follows “I”
it is pronounced
as “J.”

Israel: “I” is
followed by the
consonant “s” so
it is pronounced as “e” -
esrael. Sometimes depending
on the choice of the speaker
the letter “I” can be
pronounced as “Y” as in
Yisrael. What this shows us
is the three different options
of using the letter “I” which
in ancient paleo-Hebrew was
called the “yud or yod or
jod.”

Page 50 of 50