Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 47

Brief Overview

AAS Radio Systems


Layers, Transmission Modes, Performance ….

2018-07-03
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 1
Overview

— Review of AAS concepts and operation

— Deep dive into performance of some cells

— Recommendations for performance monitoring

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 2


Review of AAS concepts
and operation
LTE Transmission Modes in 3GPP
Downlink Multiple Antenna Transmission Modes

— The TDD LTE AAS introduces TM8 for beamforming


— This PPT investigates transmission mode performance from two active cells with commercial traffic

Rel-8 — TM2 Transmit diversity ”Legacy” LTE


— TM3 Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing transmission modes
— TM4 Closed loop spatial multiplexing
— TM5 Codebook based MU-MIMO
— TM6 Rank-1 closed loop spatial multiplexing
— TM7 Single layer transmission (only for TDD)

Rel-9 — TM8 Dual layer transmission (TDD, FDD optional)


UE-specific
— MU-MIMO possible (reciprocity based)
reference signals
— Possible for 1 and 2 Layer transmissions
for demodulation
Spatial Multiplexing
2x2 Data Transmissions 𝑤11 Antenna port 0
𝑾= 𝑤
12 Antenna port 1

Codeword 1
IQ IQ

Layer 1
codeword

ഥ w11 w12
𝑿 ഥ =𝑾∙𝑿

𝒀
𝑤11 𝑤21 Antenna port 0
𝑾= 𝑤
Layer 2
codeword
12 𝑤22 Antenna port 1

w21 w22
Codeword 1 Codeword 2

— Weights determine the directionality of each antenna’s beam


— For Rank 1 (eg Tx diversity), the Layer 2 (red) path is not applicable
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 5
LTE Transmission Modes

— The AAS can transmit using a number of modes


— Transmit diversity (TM2 - 1 layer)
— Open Loop MIMO Rank 1 (TM3 - 1 layer)
— Open Loop MIMO Rank 2 (TM3 - 2 layer)
— Beamformed Rank 1 (TM8 - 1 layer)
— Beamformed Rank 2 (TM8 - 2 layer)

— TM8 beamforming introduces additional Reference Symbol 14 REs

overheads (DM-RS) which reduces the peak throughput

12 sub-carriers
— For CFI3 TM8 as 10% less REs available for PDSCH
than does TM3
— The TM8 beamformed PDCCH will have a better SINR
which can lead to higher throughputs than TM3/TM2 at
medium to low SINR
RS0 RS1
PDCCH PDSCH PDCCH or PDSCH based on CFI
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 6
R7 & R8 UE-specific (DM-RS)
AAS Cell Coverage

— Broadcast beam defines the cell coverage

— RSRP and SINR measurements (in TM3 and TM8) are


based on the Reference Symbols transmitted on the
broadcast beam

— In TM8 mode the PDSCH is transmitted on the traffic beam


— Data can be transmitted using 1 or 2 layers Traffic beam
— TM8 uses additional demodulation RS (DMRS) which
are transmitted on the traffic beam

— In TM3 mode the PDSCH is transmitted using the Broadcast beam


broadcast beam pattern

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 7


AAS Macro Cell Shape Macro Broadcast Beam
3D Pattern

Antenna Beam Patterns Electrical tilt = 8°

— Reference Symbols and Control Channels transmitted on


the broadcast beam

— UEs with an SRS resource will receive TM8 transmissions on


a beamformed Traffic beam
— Traffic beam falls within the Traffic Beam Envelope

— UEs without an SRS resource will receive TM3


transmissions on the broadcast beam
— MU-MIMO is not possible on TM3 transmissions

Spatial characteristics of beam Macro Traffic – TM8 Traffic - TM3

EIRP max per broadcast beam 2 x 64.5 dBm 2 x 71.5 dBm 2 x 64.5 dBm

Horizontal pattern, HPBW 65 ± 5° 12 ± 3° 65 ± 5°

Vertical pattern, HPBW 10 ± 1° 10 ± 1° 10 ± 1°

Digital downtilt
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 8 -8° to +8° n/a n/a
AAS Antenna Beam Examples
AIR6468 Band 42 Horizontal Vertical
Macro Broadcast Beam, Vtilt= 8
Scenario: Macro Beam
Parameter BrM1, BrM2
Vertical Beamwidth 10±1
Horizontal beamwidth 65±5
Digital downtilt [-8,8]
Vertical beam pointing error ≤1
Horizontal beam pointing 0±5
EIRP (max) 2x64.5 dBm
Vertical side lobe suppression 16 dB
Front to back ratio 25 dB
Beam parallellity (BrM1•BrM2) ≤-10 dB
Traffic Beam, Htilt=0,Vtilt= 3

Uniform traffic beams Direction


Parameter H0 V3 deg H55 V3 deg H0 V18 deg
Vertical Beamwidth 9.5 9.5 10
Horizontal beamwidth 12 22 12
Minimum peak EIRP 2x71.5 dBm 2x68 dBm 2x70 dBm

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 9


DL MU-MIMO
Intra-Cell Interference A

B
— An increased number of MU-MIMO users increases the
interference between users/layers
— Since power is shared by the co-scheduled layers the
power per layer reduces as the number of users MU-
MIMO increases EIRP
— SINR reduces as the number of MU-MIMO co-scheduled
users increases A B

SINR

Frequency reuse
(MU-MIMO)

SINR q
(MCS per MIMO layer)
Interference from B into A
Typically # layers
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 11
~8 layers
Antenna Pattern
Multiple Traffic Beams Horizontal Pattern

Single Traffic Single Traffic beam


beam uses all uses all available
available power power

For two Traffic For five Traffic beams


beams the EIRP the EIRP per beam is
per beam is reduced by 7dB
reduced by 3dB
The grating lobes of
the ±60° Traffic
beams can be seen in
this graph

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 12


TM3 Transmissions
Impact of CFI on Maximum Throughput RS0 RS1 RS2 RS3

PDCCH PDSCH PDCCH or PDSCH based on CFI

14 REs

12 sub-carriers
MCS Modulation TBS Physical Resource Blocks (RB)
Index Index
TBS 1 2 .. 50 .. 100
0 QPSK 0
0 16 32 1384 2792

15 16QAM 14
14 256 552 14112 28336

27 64QAM 25

28 64QAM 26
25 616 1256 31704 63776 2 Tx antenna – CFI = 1 4 Tx antenna – CFI = 1
26 712 1480 36696 75376
1 RB = 144 RE for PDSCH 1 RB = 136 RE for PDSCH

L1 Peak Throughput – 2 layers 100 RB = 14,400 REs 100 RB = 13,600 REs


75,376 x 2 x 0.74 = 111.6 Mbps Coding rate ≈ [75376+24] / [14400x6] ≈ 0.87 Coding rate ≈ [75376+24] / [13600x6] ≈ 0.92
Peak rates use MCS 28
64QAM Modulation & MIMO
Transmission 2 Tx antenna – CFI = 2 4 Tx antenna – CFI = 2
1 RB = 132 RE for PDSCH 1 RB = 128 RE for PDSCH

L1 Peak Throughput – 2 layers 100 RB = 13,200 REs 100 RB = 12,800 REs


75,376 x 2 x 0.74 = 111.6 Mbps Coding rate ≈ [75376+24] / [13200x6] ≈ 0.95 Coding rate ≈ [75376+24] / [12800x6] ≈ 0.98
63,776 x 2 x 0.74 = 94.4 Mbps Coding rate ≈ [63776+24] / [13200x6] ≈ 0.81 Coding rate ≈ [63776+24] / [12800x6] ≈ 0.83

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 13


CFI3
CFI2

TM8 Transmissions CFI1 14 REs

Impact of DMRS & CFI on Peak Throughputs

12 sub-carriers
— TM8 introduces DMRS to assist with the UE with demodulation of the
beamformed PDSCH
— The PDSCH and DMRS are transmitted on the traffic beam
— The DMRS reduces the RE available for PDSCH limiting the peak rate RS0 RS1

— The UE does not demodulate a coding rate > 0.93 PDCCH PDSCH PDCCH or PDSCH based on CFI

R7 & R8 UE-specific (DM-RS)


3GPP TS 36.211 V12.2.0 (2014-06)

2 Tx antenna – CFI = 1 (shown above)


MCS Mod TBS Physical Resource Blocks 1 RB = 132 RE for PDSCH → 100 RB = 13,200 REs L1 Peak Throughput – 2 layers
Index Index 75,376 x 2 x 0.74 = 111.6 Mbps
TBS 26 ≈ [75376+24] / [13200x6] Coding rate ≈ 0.95
TBS 1 . 50 . 100
0 QPSK 0 TBS 25 ≈ [63776+24] / [13200x6] Coding rate ≈ 0.81 63,776 x 2 x 0.74 = 94.4 Mbps
0 16 1384 2792
2 Tx antenna – CFI = 2
15 16QAM 14
1 RB = 108 RE for PDSCH → 100 RB = 12,000 REs L1 Peak Throughput – 2 layers
23 552 28336 57336
TBS 26 ≈ [75376+24] / [12000x6] Coding rate ≈ 1.04 75,376 x 2 x 0.74 = 111.6 Mbps
24 584 30576 61664
27 64QAM 25
TBS 25 ≈ [63776+24] / [12000x6] Coding rate ≈ 0.89 63,776 x 2 x 0.74 = 94.4 Mbps
25 616 31704 63776
28 64QAM 26
26 712 36696 75376 2 Tx antenna – CFI = 3
1 RB = 108 RE for PDSCH → 100 RB = 10,800 REs L1 Peak Throughput – 2 layers

TBS 25 ≈ [63776+24] / [10800x6] Coding rate ≈ 0.98 63,776 x 2 x 0.74 = 94.4 Mbps
Peak rates use MCS 28
TBS 24 ≈ [61664+24] / [10800x6] Coding rate ≈ 0.95 61,664 x 2 x 0.74 = 91.3 Mbps
Bits / TTI
64QAM Modulation
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence& | Page 14 TBS 23 ≈ [57336+24] / [10800x6] Coding rate ≈ 0.88 57,336 x 2 x 0.74 = 84.9 Mbps
MIMO Transmission
Transmission Modes
Scheduling SU-MIMO & MU-MIMO
The following applies when a cell is configured for TM8 transmissions and
transmission mode switching is not activated >15°

— The eNB checks the UE pairs with data in the buffer for beam-weight
orthogonality and the assignment of SRS resources >15°

— If MU-MIMO is not required for “capacity” reasons and the UEs have SRS >15°
resources assigned then the data is scheduled as TM8 Dual Layer
— The eNB “estimates” the beam weights for the other polarization

— If MU-MIMO is required for “capacity” reasons and the UEs have SRS resources
UEs need angular separation in order to be
then the data is scheduled as TM8 Single Layer scheduled for MU-MIMO, otherwise there
— The UEs co-scheduled on the same PRB/TTI resources have different beam weights would be “traffic beam overlap” leading to
applied to the transmissions of the PDSCH and DMRS high levels of intra-cell interference.

— If the UEs don’t have SRS resources assigned then data is transmitted as TM3

— TM3 and TM8 can’t be scheduled in the same TTI


2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 15
• Note: This is an extremely high level description of the scheduling process
Example of AAS Sites
Transmission Formats AAS AAS

SRS configured UEs with angular separation in a UEs in an AAS cell which is not configured
cell requiring MU-MIMO for capacity may be co- for TM8 beamforming will receive DL
scheduled on the same TTI/PRB resources. These transmissions in TM3 MIMO or Tx Diversity.
UEs will equally share the power available for The UEs will share the PRBs &/or TTIs.
PDSCH and DMRS REs and will have orthogonal
beam-weights applied to their transmissions.

AAS

Non-AAS
UEs in a non-AAS cell will receive DL
transmissions in TM3 MIMO or Tx Diversity. A UE in a AAS cell configured for TM8 which does not required
MU-MIMO transmissions for “capacity” reasons will have data
scheduled in TM8 Dual Layer (provided there is sufficient data to
required 2 layers and the SINR is high enough for 2 layer
transmission, otherwise TM8 Single Layer will be used).
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 16
Demonstrating Peak Throughput
Maximizing MU-MIMO Performance
— How to demonstrate the maximum MU-MIMO capabilities for showcase demos

— UEs are separated so that the angular separation between the UEs is ≥ the half power
beamwidth of the traffic beam

— Ideally an single cell scenario is used do UEs wont connect to another sector of the same Front view
site
Side view

— Distance between BTS and UEs is very small >10°


>15°
(usually less than ~120m)
>10°

>10°

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 17


2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 18
UE8

196m 107°
152m 121°
UE6

UE7

166m 117°
UE5

147m 126°

UE3

89m 93°
UE2

85m 113°
UE Number TM3 – MU- TM8 – MU- UE4
MIMO OFF MIMO ON 85m 173°
1 13 45 UE1

2 15 42 47m 150°
3 14 45
4 12 45
5 15 40
6 13 46 AAS
7 13 42
8 15 45
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 19
Total 110 Mbps 351 Mbps
Cell Performance
Monitoring
Throughput - Experience
Reliability of Throughput
measurement to show potential
Throughput for a user

Very small burst like TCP ACKs and 32B Pings etc.
How is throughput measured for a 54B Ping that is
sent in 1 TTI ?
- 432 Kilobits/s?

Samples from this traffic


makes a measurement
result hard to interpret.
Larger burst, like 1MB
Medium burst, Facebook download etc.
updates etc that fits in
2→15~20 TTIs
Samples from this traffic
is well representative for
potential Throughput for
a user.

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 21


Burst Size
DL Definitions
User Throughput & Cell Throughput
Successful transmission,
buffer not empty
pmPdcpLatTimeDl pmUeThpTime
Failed transmission (”Block
The last TTI with data
error”)
shall always be
Successful transmission, removed. This since the
buffer empty coding can be selected
based on size, not radio
No transmission, buffer not conditions, hence not
empty (e.g. due to contention) end-user impacting.

Data arrives to First data is Time (ms)


empty DL buffer The send buffer is
transmitted to the UE
again empty

pmPdcpVolDlDrb = Σ + pmPdcpVolDlDrbLastTTI = Σ
pmUeThpTimeDl = count ( , ) pmSchedActivityCellDl = count ( , , )

DL User Throughput KPI = (pmPdcpVolDlDrb – pmPdcpVolDlDrbLastTTI) / pmUeThpTimeDl [Mbps]


DL Cell Throughput KPI = pmPdcpVolDlDrb / pmSchedActivityCellDl [Mbps]
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 22
UL Definitions
User Throughput & Cell Throughput
Successful transmission, buffer not empty
First 4 receptions removed
Receptions excluded from Throughput Calculations
Time and Vol used The last TTI with data
Failed transmission (”Block error”) for calculation shall always be
removed. This since the
Successful transmission, buffer empty coding can be selected
based on size, not radio
No transmission, buffer not conditions, hence not
empty (e.g. due to contention) end-user impacting.

Data arrives to
Grant sent to UE Time (ms)
empty UL buffer First data is The send buffer is
Scheduler request transmitted to the eNB again empty
sent to eNB

pmUeThpVolUl = Σ pmPdcpVolUlDrb = Σ + +
pmUeThpTimeUl = count ( , ) pmSchedActivityCellUl = count ( , , , )

UL User Throughput KPI = pmUeThpVolUl / pmUeThpTimeUl [Mbps]


UL Cell Throughput KPI = pmPdcpVolUlDrb / pmSchedActivityCellUl [Mbps]
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 23
Cell Deep Dive
Cell with Busy Hour ~40 RRC Connected Users

— Cell B48752
— Date: Friday 29/06/2018, hourly data
— Busy hour RRC Connected Users ≈ 40 users
— DL Cell throughput > 30 Mbps
— DL UE throughput generally ~ 10 Mbps
— At 20:00 dropped to around 6 Mbps
— Max RRC Connected Users close to average

Counters

Ave RRC Conn User = EUtranCellTDD.pmRrcConnLevSum / EUtranCellTDD.pmRrcConnLevSamp


Max RRC Conn User = EUtranCellTDD.pmRrcConnMax
DL UE Tput = (EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcpVolDlDrb - EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcpVolDlDrbLastTTI)/EUtranCellTDD.pmUeThpTimeDl
DL Cell Tput = EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcpVolDlDrb / EUtranCellTDD.pmSchedActivityCellDl
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 24
Cell Deep Dive
Cell DL Active Users

— Busy hour RRC Connected Users ≈ 40 users

— DL Cell throughput > 30 Mbps

— DL Active users is the number of users will data in


the buffer

Counters

Ave DL Active UE = EUtranCellTDD.pmActiveUeDlSum / (min(720000,EUtranCellTDD.pmSchedActivityCellDl))


DL UE Tput = (EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcpVolDlDrb - EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcpVolDlDrbLastTTI)/EUtranCellTDD.pmUeThpTimeDl
DL Cell Tput = EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcpVolDlDrb / EUtranCellTDD.pmSchedActivityCellDl
Note:720000 = max DL TTI for TDD Frame config 2 in a 15 min ROP
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 25
Cell Deep Dive
Data Volume

— DL data volume transmitted peaks at about 14 GB in


the busiest hours

— UL data volume is < 800 MB at this time

— A general “rule of thumb” is that the ratio DL:UL


volume will be between 8 and 12 for TCP traffic

— A high ratio of DL:UL volume, here peaking at close to


30, indicates applications optimized for DL
throughput (most likely video streaming)

Counters

DL Vol (GB) = EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcpVolDlDrb/8000000


UL Vol (GB) = EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcpVolUlDrb/8000000
Ratio DL to UL Vol = DL Vol / UL Vol
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 26
YouTube Video Streaming
Comparison of Different Video Quality Data Volume vs Time - 1.04 min Youtube 360p Video
5.0
4.5

Cumulative Data Volume [MB]


4.0

— The video was 1.04 min in duration, streamed on a commercial mobile 3.5
3.0
network 2.5
2.0

— The Chrome browser was used and the protocol used in the video stream 1.5
1.0
was QUIC (Quick UDP Internet Connections, pronounced quick) which is an 0.5
experimental transport layer network protocol designed by at Google 0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
Elapsed Time [Sec]
— Total data volume for 360p
Inbound 4.66 MB, Data Volume vs Time - 1.04 min Youtube 1080p Video
24
Outbound 198.5 kB 22
Ratio DL:UL 23.5

Cumulative Data Volume [MB]


20
18
16
— Total data volume for 1080p 14
12
Inbound 22.88 MB 10
Outbound 748 kB 8
6
Ratio DL:UL 30.6 4
2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 27 Elapsed Time [sec]
Cell Deep Dive
DL Throughput – Last TTI

— A relatively high proportion of the DL throughput Data in Last TTI Counter


volume is considered “Last TTI”

— This means that when it is transmitted to the UE it


empties the buffer

— This volume (and transmit time) will not contribute to


the DL UE throughput KPI calculation

— Looking at some later some later stats it is possible to


estimate potential throughput for these UEs served in
the last TTI

Counters

Percent Last TTI Util = EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcpVolDlDrbLastTTI / EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcpVolDlDrb


2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 28
Cell Deep Dive
DL Air Interface Resource Utilization

— Observation about the air interface utilization

— Firstly the TTIs are utilized


— Then the number of PRBs used increases
— Then the “PRB utilization” increases; a value above 100%
indicates that PRBs are being used for ≥ 2 layers

— During hour of lowest throughput not all PRBs were used;


potentially due to
— Short period of demand (not spread over whole hour)
— Possibly UEs in poorer coverage demanding more resources
Counters

Percent DL TTI Util = min(720000, pmSchedActivityCellDl)/720000


Percent DL PRB Used = ΣpmPrbUsedMimoLayersDlDistr[x])/pmPrbAvailDl
Percent DL PRB Util = Σ(x+1)*pmPrbUsedMimoLayersDlDistr[x])/pmPrbAvailDl
Note:720000 = max DL TTI for TDD Frame config 2 in a 15 min ROP
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 29
Cell Deep Dive
A Quiet Cell

— Max 18 RRC Connected Users


— DL User Throughput is close to Cell throughput in the busy
hours
— Only about 40% of RE’s used
— ~60% of traffic volume not included in UE Throughput
counter
Data in Last TTI Counter

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 30


Cell Deep Dive
DL Layers

— Cell was configured for a maximum of 4 DL Layers

— During peak hours there was some 3 and 4 Layer


transmissions indicating MU-MIMO operation

— 2 Layer operation may be:


— SU-MIMO dual layer to a single UE, or
— MU-MIMO single layer to 2 UEs

Counters

Layer1 = EUtranCellTDD.pmPrbUsedMimoLayersDlDistr[0]
Layer2 = EUtranCellTDD.pmPrbUsedMimoLayersDlDistr[1]
Layer3 = EUtranCellTDD.pmPrbUsedMimoLayersDlDistr[2]
Layer4 = EUtranCellTDD.pmPrbUsedMimoLayersDlDistr[3]
Layer5 = EUtranCellTDD.pmPrbUsedMimoLayersDlDistr[4]
Layer6 = EUtranCellTDD.pmPrbUsedMimoLayersDlDistr[5]
Layer7 = EUtranCellTDD.pmPrbUsedMimoLayersDlDistr[6]
Layer8 = EUtranCellTDD.pmPrbUsedMimoLayersDlDistr[7]
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 31
Cell Deep Dive
DL Transmission Modes

— Transmission mode was mainly TM8 Rank 1 –


SU-MIMO
— Used for single UE Tx diversity or MU-MIMO
scheduling

— TM8 Rank 2 reports are high, up to 50% during


the quiet hours indicating SU-MIMO dual layer
operation

— Some TM3 and TM2 indicating a small number of


UEs don’t have SRS resources available
Counters

Tm2 = EUtranCellTDD.pmRadioTxRankDistr[0]
Tm3_Rank1 = EUtranCellTDD.pmRadioTxRankDistr[1]
Tm3_Rank2 = EUtranCellTDD.pmRadioTxRankDistr[2]
Tm8_Rank1 = EUtranCellTDD.pmRadioTxRankDistr[6]
Tm8_Rank2 = EUtranCellTDD.pmRadioTxRankDistr[7]
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 32
Mapping CQI to SINR
Values Based on Field Testing from a Network
Typical mappings This is a typical mapping of CQI to SINR based
CQI index SINR [dB] on field test of an early LTE terminal.
0 out of range
1 -7.23 Chipset manufacturers can have different
2 -5.48 mapping as this mapping is not standardized.
3 -3.43
4 -1.37
5 0.55
6 2.47
7 4.58 Example CQI stats for a FDD three
8 6.39 sector site in a MBB network
9 8.34
10 10.44
11 12.39
12 14.15
13 16.02
14 17.61
15 18.95
Cell Deep Dive
UE CQI Reports

— UE CQI reports provide an indication of DL


channel quality

— The exact CQI to DL SINR translation is not


standardized
— This allows UE vendor differentiation

— The common lookup has been used to convert the


CQI to a DL SINR dB

— Percentile values have been taken from the PDF


counters

— 90th percentile and average CQI are good,


Counters
however 10th percentile shows some low values
indicating users in poor SINR locations CQI1 = EUtranCellTDD.pmRadioUeRepCqiDistr [0 .. 15]
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 34
CQI2 = EUtranCellTDD.pmRadioUeRepCqiDistr2 [0 .. 15]
Cell Deep Dive
UE CQI Reports
Entel Massive MIMO cell

— Comparison provided of Entel network CQI


values compared to a TM3 FWA cell in another
network

— Entel TM8 (beamforming) network shows improved


SINR for CQI1 indicating benefits of SU-MIMO
transmissions with beamforming

— TM3 network shows CQI1 and CQI2 almost the same


value

Traditional TM3 FWA cell

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 35


Cell Deep Dive
Data Bits per Resource Element
Entel Massive MIMO cell

— The top graph shows the number of data bits per


Resource Element

— Provides an indication as to the radio quality and is


linked to CQI reporting

— Bits per RE can be used to estimate throughput


potential

— Scheduling Entities per TTI indicates the number of


simultaneously scheduled users per TTI

Counters
Traditional TM3 FWA cell
DL Bits Per RE = EUtranCellTDD.pmRadioThpVolDl / EUtranCellTDD.pmRadioThpResDl
UL Bits Per RE = EUtranCellTDD.pmRadioThpVolUl / EUtranCellTDD.pmRadioThpResUl

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 36


Cell Deep Dive 64QAM

Modulation Format

— The UE CQI reports are used to determine the MCS that the
BTS uses to transmit to the UE 16QAM
— An average of 3 bits per RE indicates 64QAM modulation is
used on average which matches the modulation format QPSK
indicator from the counters

— For TM8 CFI3 there are 10,800 REs in 100 RB CQI index modulation code rate x 1024 efficiency
0 out of range
— So potential TM8 Rank 2 transmission at 3 bits/RE is: 1 QPSK 78 0.1523
2 QPSK 120 0.2344
2 x 10,800 x 3 = 64,800 bits in 1 ms 3 QPSK 193 0.3770
4 QPSK 308 0.6016
5 QPSK 449 0.8770
6 QPSK 602 1.1758
7 16QAM 378 1.4766
Counters 8 16QAM 490 1.9141
9 16QAM 616 2.4063
QPSK = EUtranCellTDD. pmMacHarqDlAckQpsk
10 64QAM 466 2.7305
16 QAM = EUtranCellTDD. pmMacHarqDlAck16qam 11 64QAM 567 3.3223
64 QAM = EUtranCellTDD. pmMacHarqDlAck64qam 12 64QAM 666 3.9023
13 64QAM 772 4.5234
According to 3GPP TS 36.213 a CQI of 10 maps to a code rate of 466 or an efficiency of 14 64QAM 873 5.1152
2.7305, while a CQI of 11 maps to a code rate of 567 or an efficiency of 3.3223. 15 64QAM 948 5.5547
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 37
It should be noted however, that CQI calculation may vary from different UE vendors.
Cell Deep Dive
PDCCH CFI Format

— The PDCCH CFI format indicates the number of symbols


(CFI value) that are required for PDCCH signaling

— If more symbols are required for PDCCH then less are


available for PDSCH data

— A higher PDCCH allocation will limit peak throughputs

— More PDCCH resources are required when MU-MIMO is


scheduled, are more users are scheduled in each PRB

Counters

Percent PDCCH CFI1 = EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcchCfiUtil[0]/ Σ EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcchCfiUtil[x]


Percent PDCCH CFI2 = EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcchCfiUtil[1]/ Σ EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcchCfiUtil[x]
Percent PDCCH CFI3 = EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcchCfiUtil[2]/ Σ EUtranCellTDD.pmPdcchCfiUtil[x]
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 38
Cell Deep Dive
UL RSSI Counters

— UL RSSI counters can be used to find cells experiencing


UL interference

— A basic wideband counter is available

— PUCCH RSSI counters can be used to identify issues on


the UL control channel

— Subframe counters are useful in TDD LTE for identifying


Cross Link Interference (CLI)
— CLI is DL BTS transmissions interfering with co-channel
BTS UL due to propagation delays

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 39


Cell Deep Dive
UL RSSI PRB Counters

— UL PRB counters are also useful in identifying issues

pmRadioRecInterferencePwrPrb0 … 99

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 40


Cell Deep Dive
UL RSSI Counters

— Wide band measurements – one sample every 1ms placed into the PDF bin ranges shown, a weighted average
is taken using a linear value for the bin ranges

— RSSI_WAve = 10*log10(WeightedAverage(EUtranCellTDD.pmRadioRecInterferencePwr,[Linear Bin Ranges]) / 1000000000000)


— RSSI_WAve_PUCCH = 10*log10(WeightedAverage(EUtranCellTDD.pmRadioRecInterferencePwrPucch,[Linear Bin Ranges]/ 1000000000000)

— Linear Bin Ranges = [0.39716,0.89716,1.12946,1.42191,1.79008,2.25357,2.83708,3.57167,4.49647,5.66072,11.07925,27.82982,69.90536,175.59432,441.07,1107.92]

— Sub frame measurements – one sample taken every 1ms and the power level placed in an accumulation counter.
The accumulation value is in pW (1 x 10-9) with 90,000 samples taken in a 15 minute measurement period. Counters are
available for all possible UL subframes.

— RSSI_SF = 10*log10(((EUtranCellTDD.pmRadioRecInterferencePwrSf1))/(EUtranCellTDD. pmRadioRecInterferencePwrSfSamp*1000000000))

— PRB measurements – one sample taken every 40ms for each PRB and the power level placed in an accumulation counter for
each PRB. The PRB counters are numbered 0 to 99. The unit of the counter is 1 mW * 2^(-44).
— pmRadioRecInterferencePwrPrb0 .. 99

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 41


Cell Deep Dive
UL Pathloss Counters

— UL pathloss counters can be used to estimate UE locations


UL Pathloss Estimate
within the cell based on pathloss

— PDF counter is incremented for each UE scheduled in the UL

— Pathloss estimate is based on UE max Tx power, power


headroom reports, PRB assignment in the UL and received
power

— The counter can then be used to estimate the DL RSRP for


UEs
— For a 2 x 40W cell the RSRP EIRP is ~ 31 dBm
— Power per RS is 15 dBm + 16 dBi broadcast beam
— Ave RSRP at UE location is 31 dBm – 115 dB = -86 dBm Counters

PL Counter =EUtranCellTDD.pmUlPathlossDistr[0 .. 20]


20 bin ranges in 5 dB steps from 50 dB to 145 dB
2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 42
Very Busy Cell Review – C28082

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 43


Very Busy Cell Review – C28082

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 44


Very Busy Cell Review – C28082

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 45


Very Busy Cell Review – C28082
Data in Last TTI Counter

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 46


Conclusion
— When considering performance it is important evaluate a number of indicators
— Considerations are:
— Number of RRC Connected and Active users
— Air interface utilization - TTIs, PRBs, Layers
— UE radio conditions (SINR, pathloss/signal strength ….)
— Interference levels – DL and UL
— Monitor throughput – primarily cell level

— Other FWA networks monitored for:


— RRC Connected users (control), Active users (measure) & Cell Throughput (measure)

— Dimensioning Users to cells is vital for guaranteeing performance in FWA networks


— Ensuring that the number of users is controlled
— User spread is important for maximizing AAS capability
— Interference control is a key to maximizing end user performance

2018-07-05 | Commercial in confidence | Page 47

Вам также может понравиться