Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract—— In proposed drive three phase synchronized pulse width modulator are also the most important factor
extinction angle control technique has been proposed for three developed for the efficiency improvement but in this case the
phase induction motor with pump and blower loads. Three problem of harmonics arises which again restrict the
semiconductor controlled switches such as IGBT or MOSFET performance of the drive[8-10]. All above techniques can
are used for this control technique. Using this method the RMS improve either efficiency or power factor of motor but they
value of the current drawn by the motor decreased by around are unable to improve the power factor and efficiency
10to20 percent for the same power output. The reduction in simultaneously.
stator current causes reduction in copper loss, improves the
power factor and also the efficiency of motor is improved. The In Single phase induction motor power factor is improved
power factor with this scheme can be brought from lagging to with the extinction angle. Output voltage is controlled by
leading range. varying the extinction angle but in this they require two
switch so it is more costly and complex operation also [1].
Keywords—Efficiency, Power Factor, Extinction angle, The above concept of extinction angle control is used for the
Three Phase, Induction Motor. proposed drive except that there is only one switch per phase
in this drive. There are three semiconductor controlled AC
I. INTRODUCTION switches are used for controlling the three phase induction
Induction motor is the widely used motor for 24 motor source voltage. The current drawn by the motor
hours running motors such as the pump and blower. As they decreased in this drive and hence the stator losses are
are continuous running motor hence they require decreased. Due to minimum losses power factor and
continuous power for their operation. Thus the power efficiency of the drive is increased.
consumption is more as the current drawn by this motor is
higher. Due to the higher stator current the copper Losses are II. CONTROL TECHNIQUE
more, and hence power factor and efficiency are reduced. By A novel technique of controlling the power factor using
controlling the undesired oscillation in the operation of extinction angle control having only one switch per phase
motor the efficiency can be improved [2]. But for this an had been used in proposed drive. The technique controls the
automatic compensation is required. Four switch three phase phase angle of the input supply which is responsible for the
inverter operation can also be used instead of six-switch power factor of the drive. The conduction of supply voltage
three phase inverter [3]. Unbalance in phase currents is started at zero crossing of supply voltage and it is forced
because of the DC link voltage occurs this is the drawback commutated at the angle of (180-). After forced
with four switch three phase inverter. For efficiency commutation the stored energy in the inductor of the stator
improvement optimal efficiency technique is used but with coil are discharged through the freewheeling path. As the
this the efficiency is improved up to a certain optimal point freewheeling path is provided for current so the current is
after that point the efficiency decreases whereas the power going to touch the zero crossing point at the same time when
factor increases continuously [4]. Three switches for the supply voltage touches its zero crossing. This is same for
improvement in power factor of three phase induction all the three phases of induction motor. Because of this the
motor using the stator current which induces rotating air displacement power factor of drive becomes cos(180-/2),
gap flux for running of motor can be used, however due where is the extinction angle. With this proposed work the
to the fast switching of switches it causes higher voltages power factor of drive is improved from lagging to leading
across motor which will stress the motor winding causing range.
higher noise and temperature[5]. The change in material
dimension is also responsible for the changes in operating Extinction angle: - The angle at which semiconductor
parameters such as current, power factor and efficiency of controlled switches are turned off before reaching their
motor. Line-Start Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor is natural commutation which is also known as the forced
the result of above concept in which the size of the copper commutation of the switches is nothing but the extinction
wire used for stator winding is changed which leads to angle for that switch.
change in efficiency of the motor [6]. As the current drawn The extinction angle control technique allows the switch
by any motor depend on the amount of stator current to be forced commutated. Fig.1 shows the changes in the
required so by changing the connection of the winding as star output voltage and input current with the implementation of
or delta suitable according to the load higher efficiency is extinction angle control technique. The switch is turned on at
achieved [7]. Pulse width modulator as well as the sinusoidal T0 remained on from time T0-T1.
351
352
2018 International Conference on Smart Electric Drives & Power System
A. ACTIVE MODE
This includes the ON- state period of semiconductor
switches. The switches S1, S2, S3 will turn on during this
operation. A gate pulse had been given to each of the switch
and allowed to turn on which will conduct up to a certain
period of time as assign by us. As the switches remains
active during this mode hence it is called as the Active mode
of operation. The current will be supplied from the AC
source to the windings of the motor as well as it will be
supplied to the capacitor across winding thus charging of
capacitor will also takes place in this mode without
disturbing the operation of induction motor. Fig 7 shows the
conduction mode of operation.
B. FREEWHEELING MODE Fig. 4 . Basic Circuit Diagram
During this mode of operation the switches will be turned
off. And the freewheeling mode of operation will start. In
this the capacitors which are connected in parallel across the
winding comes into operation. The motor will not stop as the
supply from the source is turned off whereas it will run
continuously by using the energy which is stored in the
capacitor. So motor will not get turn off. It will continue to
run. Fig 8 shows the freewheeling mode of operation.
Fig. 5 AC switch
Rm= 6.75
Xm=8.2
M=105
P=2
Rr=8.08
Xr=4
Fig. 10 Speed vs. Input P.F. (comparison between proposed and plain
motor drive)
Fig.11 Speed vs. Input Current (comparison between proposed and plain
Fig. 9 Basic Block Diagram Of Circuit motor drive).
354
2018 International Conference on Smart Electric Drives & Power System
Fig.11 shows the characteristic of input current with the Table No. 1: P.F. Comparison of EAC and FAC drive
change in the speed of the drive. Generally reduction in the Extinction angle Firing angle controlled
speed of the drive results in reduction of the current required speed controlled drive PF drive PF
as per the investigation which had been takes place with 1320 0.85 leading 0.4 lagging
various techniques. But this reduction in current is in very 1350 0.90 leading 0.45 lagging
less amount. By considering the graph of speed vs. current 1360 0.94 leading 0.47 lagging
with extinction angle control it is clear that the resultant 1380 0.96 leading 0.5 lagging
decrease in the current with this control technique is high 1400 0.98 leading 0.55 lagging
with the respect of plain motor drive. 1420 0.995 leading 0.6 lagging
1440 0.9 lagging 0.65 lagging
Fig. 12 shows the characteristics of speed vs. input
1460 0.72 lagging 0.72 lagging
power. The aim of the proposed drive is to reduce the power
consumption of the continuously running motors. As the
Fig.13 shows the speed vs. P.F. graph for the FAC drive
extinction angle control technique is capable of reducing the
and Plain motor drive. For comparing the EAC drive with
motor current and increasing the power factor hence the
firing angle control consider fig. and fig. 11. By observing
change in both these quantities are responsible for the
both the figure it is concluded that the in firing angle control
reduction in the power required by the drive. From
technique the power factor of the motor goes on decreasing
observing the curves of input power for the plain motor
with the reduction of speed and it gives a poor performance
drive and the proposed drive it is clear that the power
even less than the plain motor drive in respect of the power
consumption in proposed drive is less for the same variation
factor. Whereas, in case of the extinction angle control drive
of the speed in both types of drives. For improving the
speed vs. P.F. curve it gives a power factor greater than the
power factor the speed of the drive is reduced up to 20% but
normal plain motor drive. FAC drive is capable of reducing
with this small reduction in speed is responsible for
the input current but it is unable to provide improvement in
considerable power factor improvement. Plain motor gives
the P.F. of the drive. Whereas the EAC drive provide P.F.
lagging power factor even after decreasing the speed of the
improvement with reduction in input current.
motor. Proposed scheme is giving leading power factor
which compensate the lagging power factor the motor.
Firing angle control technique comparison with extinction
angle control technique:
The given Table No.1 gives the power factor for various
speed of the drive for extinction angle control drive and
firing angle control drive. EAC drive gives leading power
factor with small reduction in the operating speed of drive
whereas the FAC drive gives more lagging power factor
with the decreasing speed.
VII. CONCLUSIONS
The existing systems for improvement of performance of
the Induction motor are capable for increasing the efficiency
in small scale but they are unable to provide high power
factor operation of drive. The proposed drive is providing
the power factor improvement from lagging to leading range
by compensating the lagging P.F using the extinction angle
Fig. 12 Speed vs. Input Power (comparison between proposed and plain
motor drive). control technique. Comparison of EAC and FAC technique
also proves that proposed drive is giving better power factor
than FAC. High power factor operation with unidirectional
flow of the current is the novelty of this drive. In this the
power factor is going to increase up to unity which was very
difficult to obtain particularly in case of AC induction
motor. But with the help of this system it becomes easily
possible.
REFERENCES
[3] Upama Bosel, K. Divyal, Vallathur Jyothil, Sreejith Voltage Control Strategies Part I,” IEEE transaction on Electrical
“Performance Analysis of Four-switch Three-phase Inverter-fed Machines and Power Electronics, pp.770-774, Sept. 2007.
Induction Motor drive”, Power and Energy Systems: Towards [11] A-R A.M. Makky , NabilA. Ahmed and Emad H. El-Zohri “Ac
Sustainable Energy (PESTSE 2014). Voltage Controller-fed Siingle _phase induction motor With Power
[4] Bilal Saracoglu, Murat Kale, Engin Ozdemir “A Novel Technique for Factor Improvement Employing Modified Phase Angle Control
Optimal Efficiency Control of Induction Motor Fed By PWM IGBT Technique” Proceeding of the Ninth International Middle-East Power
AC Chopper”, 35th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists System Conference, Mepcon 2003, Minoufiya University, Shebin El-
Conference, 2004. Kom, Egypt, December 16-18,2003.
[5] Brian A. Welchko, Thomas A. Lip0 “A Novel Variable Frequency [12] K.S. Lock, Thyristor control of Shaded-Pole Induction Motors,
Three-phase Induction Motor Drive System Using Only Three Electric Machines and Power Systems, pp.185-193,1987.
Controlled Switches”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications [13] M.H.Rashid, Power Electronics: Circuits, Devices and Applications
(Volume: 37, Issue: 6, Nov/Dec 2001 ). 2nd edition, upper saddle river, New Jersey : Prentice Hall, 1993.
[6] W. Fei, P. C. K. Luk, J.Ma, J. X. Shen, and G. Yang_ “A High- [14] Nabil A. Ahmed, K.Amei, M. Sakui, “ A New Configuration of
Performance Line-Start Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Single phase Symmetrical PWM AC Chopper Voltage Controllers.”
Amended From a Small Industrial Three-Phase Induction Motor”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 942-952, Oct. 1999.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 45, NO. 10,
OCTOBER 2009. [15] Nabil A. Ahmed, Kenji Amei, Masaaki Sakui, “AC Chopper Voltage
Controlled Fed Single- Phase Induction Motor Employing
[7] Fernando J. T. E. Ferreira, An´ibal T. de Almeida “Method for In- Symmetrical PWM Control Technique.” Electrical Power System
Field Evaluation of the Stator Winding Connection of Three-Phase Research Journals, Vol.55, no.1, pp. 15-25, July 2000.
Induction Motors to Maximize Efficiency and Power Factor”, IEEE
TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, VOL. 21, NO. 2, [16] C.V. Abroal and S. S. Sharama, “Integral-Cycle Control of Single-
JUNE 2006. Phase Induction Motor Using SCR’s” International Conference of
Electrical Machines, ICEM, pp 35-37, 1988.
[8] Nabil A. Ahmed , Masafumi Miyatake, Hyun Woo Lee and Mutsu
Nakaoka “A Novel Circuit Topology Of Three Phase Direct AC-AC [17] Loungya Xu., “Dynamic Model of an Integral-Cycle Controlled
PWM Voltage Regulator “ IEEE transaction on Industry Applications Single Phase Induction Machine,” IEEE Transaction on Energy
Conference , Oct. 2006. Conversion, Vol. 7, no.4, pp761-767, December 1992.
[9] Dong-Choon Lee, Member, IEEE, and Young-Sin Kim, “Control of [18] T.S. Radwan, M. Nasir Uddin and M.A. Rahman, “Performance
Single Phase-to-Three-Phase AC/DC/AC PWM Converters for Analysis of a Cost-Effective 4-Switch 3-Phase Inverter Fed IM
Induction Motor Drives,” IEEE transactions on industrial electronics, Drive”, Iranian Journal Of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
vol. 54, no.2, april 2007. Vol.5, No.2, Summer Fall 2006.
[10] A.M. Eltamaly, A.I. Alolah and R.M. Hamouda “ Performance
Evaluation of Three-Phase Induction Motor under Different AC
356