Statistical Analysis with Software Application (STAT 2100)

1st Semester, 2019-2020

Name: Hazel A. Javaluyas Score: ___________________

Course Yr & Section: ______________________ Signature: _______________

Exercise 1
Tabular and Graphical Presentation of Data using Excel

A. Relationship to Household Head

Table 1. Relationship to Household Head Distribution of Respondents

Relationship to Household Relative
Frequency
Head Frequency
Head 244 32.80
Wife/Spouse 162 21.77
Son/daughter 218 29.30
Brothers/sisters 13 1.75
Son/daughter in law 40 5.38
Grandchildren 16 2.15
Father/mother 6 0.81
Other relative 37 4.97
Boarder 0 0.00
Domestic Helper 3 0.40
Non-relative 5 0.67

Frequency
Non-relative
Domestic Helper
Boarder
Other relative
Father/mother
Grandchildren
Son/daughter in law
Brothers/sisters
Son/daughter
Wife/Spouse
Head
0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Figure 1.1 Graphs for Frequency Distribution of Respondents’ Relationship to Household Head
 Relative Frequency
0% 1%
1% 0% Head
2%
5% Wife/Spouse
2% 5% Son/daughter
33% Brothers/sisters
Son/daughter in law
Grandchildren
29% Father/mother
Other relative
22%
Boarder
Domestic Helper

Figure 1.2 Relative Frequency Distribution of Relationship of the Respondents to Household Head

The figures above represent the quantity of respondents for each category and how the total
quantity is distributed among them. The relative frequency graph illustrates that out of 744 respondents of
the Labor Force Survey 2016, 33% are the head themselves, composing of the majority or 244 out of all
the respondents. It is followed by the number of sons/daughters constituting 29%, and the wives/spouses
which is 22%. However, the least relative frequency aside from boarders, which does not have any
quantity from the figures above, is the group of domestic helpers which is only 0.4%.

B. Sex

Table 2. Sex Distribution of Respondents

Relative
Sex Frequency
Frequency
Male 360 48.39
Female 384 51.61

Frequency
Female

Male

340 350 360 370 380 390

Figure 2.1 Frequency Distribution of Sex of the Respondents

 Relative Frequency

48% Male
52% Female

Figure 2.2 Relative Frequency of Sex of the Respondents

Figure 2.2 represents the portion of male and female from 744 respondents. Out of the total
respondents, there are more female than male. 52% or more than half is composed of women, while there
is a lesser number of male comprising the remaining 48%.

C. Marital Status

Table 3. Marital Status Distribution of Respondents

Relative
Marital Status Frequency
Frequency
Single 224 30.11
Married 449 60.35
Widowed 57 7.66
Divorced/Separated 14 1.88
Annulled 0 0.00
Unknown 0 0.00

Frequency
Unknown
Annulled
Divorced/Separated
Widowed
Married
Single

0 100 200 300 400 500

Figure 3.1 Frequency Distribution of Marital Status of the Respondents

 2%
0% Relative Frequency
0%

8% Single

30% Married
Widowed
Divorced/Separated
Annulled
60%
Unknown

Figure 3.2 Relative Frequency of the Respondents’ Marital Status

Figure 3.2 shows that the majority respondents or 60% were composed of married men and
women, followed by those who are single which is 30%, and 8% are widowed. However, none of them
are annulled while only 2% were divorced or separated.

D. Graduate of technical/vocational course

Table 4. Number of Graduates and Non-graduates of TechVoc Course

Relative
Graduate /Non Graduate Frequency
Frequency
Graduate of TechVoc 50 6.72
Not a graduate of TechVoc 694 93.28

Frequency

Not a graduate of TechVoc

Graduate of TechVoc

0 200 400 600 800

Figure 4.1 Frequency of Graduates and Non-graduates of Technical/vocational Course

 Relative Frequency

7%

Graduate of TechVoc

Not a graduate of
TechVoc
93%

Figure 4.2 Relative Frequency of Graduates and Non-graduates of Technical/vocational Course

Based on the figure above, it is well illustrated that majority of the respondents, or 93%, were
non-graduates of a Technical/Vocational course. Those who were graduates of such course comprises
only 7% of the total respondents.

E. Overseas Filipino Indicator

Table 5. Overseas Filipino Indicator Distribution

Overseas Filipino Relative

Frequency Frequency
Indicator

Overseas Contract 5.65

42
Workers
Workers other than 0.00
0
OCW
Employees in
Philippine Embassy, 0.00
0
Consulates & other
Missions
Students 0.00
0
abroad/Tourists

Others 702 94.35

 Frequency
Others

Students abroad/Tourists

Employees in Philippine Embassy,

Consulates & other Missions

Workers other than OCW

Overseas Contract Workers

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Figure 5.1 Frequency Distribution of Overseas Filipino Indicator

Relative Frequency
0%0%
0% Overseas Contract
6% Workers

Workers other than

OCW

Employees in Philippine
Embassy, Consulates &
other Missions
Students
94% abroad/Tourists

Figure 5.2 Relative Frequency of Overseas Filipino Indicator

Figure 5.2 shows the relative frequency distribution of the Overseas Filipino Indicator, whether
the respondents are Overseas Contract Workers, Workers other than OCW, Employees in Philippine
Embassy, Consulates & other Missions, Students abroad/Tourists, and others. Out of 744 respondents, 6%
comprises those who are Overseas Contract Workers, while others comprise 94%.