Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

The Majority Report -- Ram Kumar Ohri,

IPS (Retd), Jai Prakash Sharma, IPS (Retd)

BOOK REVIEWThe Majority Report


By Ram Kumar Ohri, IPS (Retd), Jai Prakash Sharma, IPS (Retd), Published by
Samarth, New Delhi 2013 (Pages 175; Rs.200/-)
Dec 2013

READ
EBOOK: http://books.google.co.in/books?id=JSpWAQAAQBAJ&dq=samarth+the+majority+r
eport+ram+kumar+ohri&source=gbs_navlinks_s

The Congress led UPA government which came into power in 2004 on the support of
Muslims took a number of policy decisions which are patently against non-Muslims. In
keeping with the Muslim demands, it set up Sachar Committee, Ranganath Misra
Commission, Committee on Muslim Minority Education including a separate Ministry of
Minority Affairs. Those conversant with the history of pre-Independence India would
recall that the Muslim League was established in 1906 after a memorandum was
presented two months earlier to Viceroy Minto. The memorandum had emphasized
that Muslims were a minority with a imperial past. The government, while considering
concessions to the community, should bear this in mind. The demands inter alia
included : separate electorates, reservation in jobs in government departments and a
Muslim university. The 1909 Morley-Minto reforms agreed to the demands minus the
setting up of a University as the British felt that this would breed separatism. As the
process of self government gained momentum, Muslims went on inflating their
demands including the creation of new provinces wherein Muslims were in a
majority. Bihar, Orissa and Sind were separated accordingly; the NWFP was declared
a Governor's province. When Mahatma Gandhi appeared on the Indian political
horizon, he surrendered to the demands in the hope that Muslims would support the
Congress in its demand for Independence. They did but insisted that India should be
divided on the basis of religion into Hindustan and Pakistan. To reinforce their demand
for a separate homeland, the Muslim League declared in March 1940, that Muslims
were a Nation and not a Minority. It is on this basis that India was divided.
The tragedy of India is that Nehru while directing the framing of India's Constitution,
introduced the word minority again. The Congress led government of UPA has
unleashed a full fledged programme for the creation of an Islamic State within the
Indian Republic. Messers Ohri and Sharma's book The Majority Report provides a
detailed picture of how the Congress government has relentlessly pursued this
objective. This reminds one of the League's demands made in pre-Independence India.
The book, a compact volume of about 200 pages, shows in detail how statistics/data
have been manipulated by the Sachar Committee to justify a set of special schemes.
According to the author : This book brings out serious irregularities in the composition,
functioning and blatant partiality towards Muslims in the Sachar Committee Report
headed by a former Chief Justice of a High Court. The authors go on to observe that
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh made an astounding statement on December 9, 2006,
proclaiming that the Muslims will have first claim to India's resources. Did the Prime
Minister forget the fact that there were crores of poor Hindus among the so-called
higher castes who also deserved to be helped?
What is not realized by the Hindus at large is that all these pro-Muslim programmes
have their financial implications. Eventually, it is the Hindus who will bear the cost of
running such schemes and programmes. Therefore, the book deserves to be read by
all who want to know how Hindus are being discriminated against and exploited by the
Congress leadership for vote bank politics.
The writers have done a yeoman's service to the majority community by producing this
book.
Published by Samarth, New Delhi 2013 (Pages 175; Rs.200/-)

http://janasangh.com/jsart.aspx?stid=579

Tuesday, 3 December 2013

GREAT EDITOR’S ADVOCACY FOR ISLAMISTS


TEJPAL, MULLAH ZAEEF AND SIMI
GREAT EDITOR’S ADVOCACY FOR ISLAMISTS
-Ram Kumar Ohri, IPS (Retd.)

Yesteryears Great Editor has a colourful personae and mysterious past. Historically the secularist
chatterati always had a short memory and somewhat purblind vision. It is surprising how the
Indian media and charmed glitterati of the 2013 THINK festival could not decode the mystery of
Tejpal’s invite to Mullah Abdul Saeed of Taliban to Goa for being counted among the galaxy of
global intellectuals. According to the Raisina Hill buzz, the Great Editor worked overtime to get
the clearance of intelligence agencies for the necessary visa for ensuring presence of the great
Mullah of Taliban at THINK-2013. No one knows whether the city grapevine of Tarun Tejpal’s
intimate proximity to Mullah Zaeef is a town gossip or ground reality.

Mullah Zaeef is a notorious misogynist believing in stoning of women, as prescribed in shariah.


Tarun Tejpal is a twice-sworn secularist. What is the connection between the two fundamentalists,
one a hard boiled Islamist and the other a self-annointed secularist? This question has often
bothered me and some of my friends. A friend of mine is convinced that thereby hangs a shadowy
tale.

In August 2008 the so-called Great Editor had carried out a sustained campaign, bordering on
secular morbidity, in defence of the banned jihadi terrorist outfit, SIMI (Students Islamic
Movement of India) which had by then already morphed into the notorious kaffir-killer outfit,
the Indian Mujahedeen. Being a well informed journalist Tejpal could not be ignorant of the fact
that barely a few months ago in November, 2007, a menacing e-mail had been circulated to media
by the radical outfit, Indian Mujahideen in proclaiming, and “The war of civilization between the
Muslims and the infidels has begun in Indian territory.”

Surely the Great Editor could not be unaware of the following important facts about SIMI
published from time to time in newspapers and journals and readily available in public domain:

i) The outfit was commissioned in Aligarh Muslim University on April 28, 1977, in
Aligarh University and named the Students Islamic. Its avowed goal is to establish Muslim rule
in India.
ii) Before it was banned, the logo of SIMI flaunted a very intimidatory logo depicting a
copy of the Quran spread across the globe and two AK-47s placed astride the holy book for
waging jihad against infidels.

iii) That the single-minded goal of SIMI is to transform India into Dar-ul-Islam either by
concerting everyone to Islam, and if necessary by waging Islam’s holy war for achieving its
cherished goal.

iv) SIMI does not believe in the concept of nation State, nor does it subscribe to
secularism. It wants to establish an Islamic caliphate across India cast in the mould of Nizam-e-
Mustafa.

Every Indian journalist knows that the most frequently flaunted slogan of SIMI has
been, “Allah is our Lord, the Qur’an is our constitution, Muhammad is our leader, Jihad is our
way and Shahada is our desire”. In addition, SIMI has always praised the Al Qaeda chief Osama
bin Laden is an outstanding example of a true Mujahid, who has undertaken Jihad on behalf of the
'Ummah'.

According to Yoginder Sikand, a well known scholar of Islam, SIMI considers ‘Nationalism’ as
a false idol devised by the non-Muslim enemies of the faith. All non-Muslims are branded by
SIMI as 'kafirs', and no distinction is made among them. Because of the Quranic belief that the
enemies of Allah are likely to offer stiff resistance to Islam, SIMI has been openly preaching that
violent Jihad needs to be waged against kaffirs of India (read the Hindus).

Despite all these facts known to even a ‘cub -journalist’ Tarun Tejpal had the cheek to launch a
vigorous campaign to defend SIMI in August, 2008, by publishing as many as seventeen articles
vociferously defending the radical outfit in his liberal-left magazine,Tehelka. To quote Tejpal, a
three month long investigation by Tehelka’s Editor-at-Large, Ajit Sahi, had revealed “a chilling
and systematic witch-hunt against innocent Muslims”.

The following pearls of wisdom incorporated by the renowned secularist in his article titled ‘The
Thin Red Line’, revealed his unwavering commitment to the cause of jihadis operating under the
umbrella of SIMI and Indian Mujahideen: “The Indian state must tread carefully. The individual
tragedies point to a wider psychosis. For the last many years – abetted by global trends – the state’s
actions seem to be deepening a prejudice against Muslims.”

In his highly labored brief for SIMI the Great Editor pontificated that “not just the policing and
the intelligence agencies that are to blame - even the judicial process is often complicit in the
miscarriage of justice”.

In those days of booming bomb blasts Tejpal published under the heading, ‘the SIMI fictions’ the
following pro-Islamist essays packed with caustic diatribes against the police and
the government:

1. The Thin Red Line, written by Tarun Tejpal himself.


2. The Kafka Project, by Ajit Sahi.
3. Inside The Whale: State vs Shahid Badr Falahi, by Ajit Sahi.
4. The Good Doctor’s Complications, by Ajit Sahi.
5. They just want Muslim boys to be always in Jail, by Ajit Sahi.
6. A Doubtful Crime: And years of Unfair Punishment, by Ajit Sahi.
7. The Cry of The Beloved Country, by Ajit Sahi.
8. The Hunt of Our Past Lives, by Ajit Sahi.
9. SIMI Here, SIMI There, SIMI Everywhere, by Ajit Sahi.
10. The History Appraiser Caught with His Books, by Ajit Sahi.
11. A Man of God, Not a Man of Terror, by Ajit Sahi.
12. Dissent or Don’t. You Are Damned Either Way, by Ajit Sahi.
13. The Left Hand Doesn’t Know. Or Doesn’t It?, by Ajit Sahi.
14. The Case of Absconding Lawyer, by Ajit Sahi.
15. A Judge Stirs a Hornet’s Nest, by Ajit Sahi.
16. The Supreme Court’s stay is a murder of justice, by Ajit Sahi.
17. Terror Has Two Faces, by Ajit Sahi.

Even a cursory reading of the above mentioned seventeen articles reveals how dear have
been the Islamist Jihadis to the bleeding heart liberal, Tarun Tejpal. The following narrative of the
advocacy for SIMI lays bare the secret story of invitation to Mullah Zaeef and his fast-tracked visa
for joining the jamboree of high profile intellectuals during Think-2013 event.

The wonder of wonders, however, was that Great Editor went ballistics to defend SIMI
barely a few weeks after the Indian Mujahedeen had killed and incapacitated scores of innocents
in serial bomb blasts in Bangalore, Jaipur and Ahmedabad in July, 2008. Another highly
provocative and intimidator e-mail captioned, The Rise of Jihad in the land of Hind was circulated
on July 26, 2008, by the Indian Mujahedeen shortly before the serial bomb blasts in Ahmedabad.
In addition to hurling filthy abuses on Hindu Gods and Goddesses, the said e-mail threatened
specifically to avenge the alleged atrocities committed against SIMI, the mysterious darling of the
Great Editor.

In the circumstances, it is difficult to guess what motivated Tejpal to mount a three months long
expensive campaign to defend SIMI has remained an unraveled mystery. Was it done free, or was
it caused by the virus called “Paid News” afflicting several secular scribes across India? No
wonder, in the year 2008 there were hush-hush rumors in Lutyen’s garden city guessing the source
of money spent by Tehelka in defending SIMI at a time when jihadi bomb blasts all around were
causing death and destruction.

Prima facie the Great Editor of yesteryears was more bothered about the civil rights of the
bombers of SIMI and Indian Mujahedeen than the lives of innocent Indian citizens who were being
incessantly slaughtered by the two radical Islamic outfits. No intelligence agency, however, dare
question Tarun Tejpal because of his high- profile political connections, including the rumor about
his easy access to 10 Janpath!

After reading the difficult-to-put-down tome, The Seige, authored by Adrian Levy and Cathy Scott
Clarke, I see a message in the boast of ISI’s Major Iqbal that they have a double agent code-named
Honey Bee and a number of Chuhe (i.e., the mice) operating in India. As a result of Major Iqbal’s
revelation several questions have cropped up in my inquisitive mind. I am listing below some of
my serious concerns:

i) Who is the Honey Bee on whom our intelligence agencies like Intelligence Bureau
and RAW cannot lay hands?

ii) Who all could be Major Iqbal’s Chuhe, or mice, nibbling at the tattered fabric of
India’s unity and integrity?

iii) How that is our Intelligence Bureau cannot identify and locate the Honey Bee and the
ISI’s Chuhe?

iv) Is there any resemblance between David Headley’s pre-26/11 recee of Mumbai and
the recent visit and reccee of Mullah Zaeef to Goa?

v) Whom all did Mullah Zaeef meet during his hurried trip to Goa? The Talibani Mullah
is a very combative and and complex strategeist.

vi) Is our tourist-paradise city of Goa, vulnerably located on Konkan coast, slated to be
targeted next time the way Mumbai was targeted in November, 2008? Goa could even face the
butchery and vandalism in the manner and on a scale showcased by the Al Shabab’s commandos
at Westcoast Mall in Nairobi on September 27, 2013?

Being a retired police officer I often feel concerned about the next jihadi strike across my
motherland. Perhaps time has come to view with extra caution the visit of Talibani Mullah Zaeef
to Goa on the pretext of joining the Think-2013 glitterati and his close association with Tejpal.

http://pctvbill.blogspot.in/

Вам также может понравиться