0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
36 просмотров1 страница
This rubric evaluates criteria on five levels - strong, satisfactory, developing, beginning, and poor/needs improvement. It assesses the selection and clarity of criteria, distinction between levels, quality of writing, and originality. A strong score is earned when all criteria are clear, levels are logically distinct, writing is understandable with specific language, and there is no plagiarism. A poor score means the criteria are incomprehensible, there is no distinction between levels, the writing is unclear, and the work is plagiarized. Scores decrease as the criteria, distinction, writing quality, and originality become less clear and coherent.
This rubric evaluates criteria on five levels - strong, satisfactory, developing, beginning, and poor/needs improvement. It assesses the selection and clarity of criteria, distinction between levels, quality of writing, and originality. A strong score is earned when all criteria are clear, levels are logically distinct, writing is understandable with specific language, and there is no plagiarism. A poor score means the criteria are incomprehensible, there is no distinction between levels, the writing is unclear, and the work is plagiarized. Scores decrease as the criteria, distinction, writing quality, and originality become less clear and coherent.
This rubric evaluates criteria on five levels - strong, satisfactory, developing, beginning, and poor/needs improvement. It assesses the selection and clarity of criteria, distinction between levels, quality of writing, and originality. A strong score is earned when all criteria are clear, levels are logically distinct, writing is understandable with specific language, and there is no plagiarism. A poor score means the criteria are incomprehensible, there is no distinction between levels, the writing is unclear, and the work is plagiarized. Scores decrease as the criteria, distinction, writing quality, and originality become less clear and coherent.
(2) ALL CRITERIAS ARE CRITERIA CAN BE CRITERIA BEING FEW KEYWORDS UNUNDERSTANDABL SELECTION CLEAR, DISTINCT IDENTIFIED BUT ASSESSED ARE WERE USED AND E SELECTION OF AND AND ARE DERIVED NOT ALL ARE UNCLEAR, HAVE CRITERIA IS WORDS AND CLARITY OF FROM THE CLEARLY STATED SIGNIFICANT UNCLEAR CRITERIA. CRITERIA APPROPRIATE CHOICE OF WORDS (ROWS) STANDARDS BUT OVERLAPS TO THE APPROPRIATE STANDARDS. EACH LEVEL IS SOME DISTINCTION FEW LEVELS IS LITTLE OR NO NO DISTINCTION OF DISTINCTION DISTINCT AND BETWEEN LEVELS DISTINCT AND DISTINCTION OF LEVELS AT ALL. BETWEEN PROGRESSES IN A IS CLEAR, BUT MAY LEVEL CRITERIAS LEVELS AND ARE LEVELS CLEAR AND BE TOO NARROW WERE UNCLEAR. NOT (COLUMNS) LOGICAL ORDER. OR TOO BIG. UNDERSTANDABLE . WRITING IS WRITING IS 3-4 WORDS ARE ONLY FEW WORDS THE PIECE OF UNDERSTANDABLE MOSTLY NOT ARE CLEAR AND WRITING IS NOT , HAS CLEAR AND UNDERSTANDABLE UNDERSTANDABL THE REST OF THE UNDERSTANDABLE QUALITY OF SPECIFIC , SOME LANGUAGE E AND UNCLEAR USAGE OF AT ALL. WRITING LANGUAGE THAT ARE VAGUE OR USE OF WORDS LANGUAGE AND HELPS STUDENTS UNCLEAR. ARE NOT WORDS ARE RELIABLY AGREE COHERENT. UNCOHERENT AND ON THE SCORING UNCLEAR. LABEL. CONTEXT AND CONTEXT, WORDS SOME CONTEXT UNCLEAR CHOICES NO MODIFICATION ORIGINALIT WORDS ARE AND LANGUAGE AND WORDS ARE OF WORDS, HAS MADE, PIECE Y CLEAR, MODIFIED ARE MOSTLY UNCLEAR AND THE DOESN’T ELICITS WAS CLEARLY AND THERE WERE CLEAR AND CHOICES OF CREATIVITY AT PLAGIARIZED. NO TRACE OF MODIFIED AND HAS LANGUAGE ARE ALL. PLAGIARISM. NO TRACE SOMEWHAT OFPLAGIARISM. COPIED AND VAGUE. TOTAL SCORE: Rubric adapted from Dr. Bonnie B. Mullinix, NU University MODIFIED AND PREPARED BY: BLAZE R. QUIBAN