 People vs Lauga

Extrajudicial confession before a bantay bayan taken without counsel is inadmissible

in evidence.

Facts:

Antonio Lauga was accused of qualified rape committed against his 13-year old daughter. One of the
witnesses for the prosecution was Moises Boy Banting, a bantay bayan in the barangay. Banting
testified that after his assistance was sought, he proceeded to Lauga's house and found the latter wearing
only his underwear. He invited Lauga to the police station, to which Lauga obliged. At the police
outpost, Lauga admitted to him that he raped his daughter AAA because he was unable to control
himself. Lauga contested the admissibility in evidence of his alleged confession with Banting. He
argues Dela Llana vs. Biong

 People vs Lauga

Extrajudicial confession before a bantay bayan taken without counsel is inadmissible

in evidence.

Facts:

Antonio Lauga was accused of qualified rape committed against his 13-year old daughter. One of the
witnesses for the prosecution was Moises Boy Banting, a bantay bayan in the barangay. Banting
testified that after his assistance was sought, he proceeded to Lauga's house and found the latter wearing
only his underwear. He invited Lauga to the police station, to which Lauga obliged. At the police
outpost, Lauga admitted to him that he raped his daughter AAA because he was unable to control
himself. Lauga contested the admissibility in evidence of his alleged confession with Banting. He
argues Dela Llana vs. Biong
 People vs Lauga

Extrajudicial confession before a bantay bayan taken without counsel is inadmissible

in evidence.

Facts:

Antonio Lauga was accused of qualified rape committed against his 13-year old daughter. One of the
witnesses for the prosecution was Moises Boy Banting, a bantay bayan in the barangay. Banting
testified that after his assistance was sought, he proceeded to Lauga's house and found the latter wearing
only his underwear. He invited Lauga to the police station, to which Lauga obliged. At the police
outpost, Lauga admitted to him that he raped his daughter AAA because he was unable to control
himself. Lauga contested the admissibility in evidence of his alleged confession with Banting. He
argues Dela Llana vs. Biong
  People vs Lauga

Extrajudicial confession before a bantay bayan taken without counsel is inadmissible

in evidence.

Facts:

Antonio Lauga was accused of qualified rape committed against his 13-year old daughter. One of the
witnesses for the prosecution was Moises Boy Banting, a bantay bayan in the barangay. Banting
testified that after his assistance was sought, he proceeded to Lauga's house and found the latter wearing
only his underwear. He invited Lauga to the police station, to which Lauga obliged. At the police
outpost, Lauga admitted to him that he raped his daughter AAA because he was unable to control
himself. Lauga contested the admissibility in evidence of his alleged confession with Banting. He
argues Dela Llana vs. Biong