Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION
The taking of Manila by the English in 1762 was a fundamental moment of
historical change in the archipelago of the Philippines.1 In terms of economic
growth, it is not easy to establish the true importance of the two-year British
occupation, as we are not yet in a position to measure the state of the Philippine
economy at that time. However, there is little doubt as to its impact on Spanish
imperial policy.2 The capture of Manila profoundly affected the institutional
framework in the country, particularly areas concerning military, fiscal and cus-
toms matters.
This brief essay will refer to this set of changes as a way of approaching the
origins of modern economic growth in the Philippines during the nineteenth and
early twentieth centuries. The essay seeks to establish this important point on the
basis of available studies, although it must be pointed out that this approach is
not always sufficient to resolve some of the main questions.3 In doing so, the essay
provides a brief survey of the economic historiography of the Philippines.
1 On the invasion, see Cushner, Documents.
2 Concerning the Spanish presence in the Philippines before the nineteenth century, the most
important book continues to be that of Phelan, Hispanization.
3 For an approach to Philippine historical literature, see Larkin, Perspectives.
© Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and the Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand 2004 307
308 Josep M. Fradera
© Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and the Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand 2004
The historical origins of the Philippine economy: a survey of recent research of the Spanish colonial era 309
The extraordinary growth of the resources derived from personal taxes had an
impact on the peasantry and also on the organisation of the archipelago’s foreign
relations. Until the mid-eighteenth century, the main trade line that linked the
Philippines with the outside world was the official one between the capital–port
of Manila and Acapulco, in present-day Mexico and the port of Canton in China.9
It was an old transoceanic route established in 1600 and used for trading Latin
American silver from Peru and Mexico for Chinese silk and Southeast Asian
spices.10 The trans-Pacific route was in decline, even though it continued to be
important in the context of the changes that occurred in the latter half of the
eighteenth century.11 First, it played a significant role in financing Spain’s domi-
nation of the Philippines. The customs duties that entered the Manila treasury
were crucial for maintaining the military in the colony.
Second, commerce between the Philippines and China was the only area of
foreign trade in the Spanish empire in which foreign navies participated. In the
past, the merchant vessels in the trade between the Philippines and China or
Southeast Asia had been exclusively Asian, until after 1750 the navies of European
countries increased their share in the trade and Asian ships under flags of conve-
nience started to carry European goods. This helps to explain why the port of
Manila was already highly internationalised before the further liberalisation of
foreign trade of the Philippines during the nineteenth century.12 Adding to the
complex trade relationships was an attempt by the Bourbon dynasty to organise
a chartered company capable of guaranteeing direct communications between
Spain and its Asian possession via the Cape of Good Hope.13 Founded in 1785,
the Compañía de Filipinas failed in its aim to transform the economy of the Philip-
pines and guarantee a regular alternative route, but it contributed to diversify
Manila’s foreign relations.
At the beginning of the nineteenth century, the weakening relationship with
Mexico was compensated by trade with Southeast Asia, British India and China.
The relationship with China in particular became more dynamic due to its opium
trade. The existence of this multilateral foreign trade, albeit of a reduced volume,
was vital for the growth of public revenue from the colonial tax system.14 Both
personal tax collection and consumption of products from fiscal monopolies were
supported by the development of commercial agriculture, rural savings and the
opportunity to monetise the savings. The modest foreign trade surplus was vital
for ensuring a steady inflow of coins for circulation so that an increase in tax
© Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and the Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand 2004
310 Josep M. Fradera
revenues would not substantially increase the pressure of taxation in the still
largely unmonetised economy and lead to social crises.15
The colonial restrictions and pressure on the rural areas did not prevent the
emergence of a modest agrarian middle class in the hinterland of the port of
Manila. Little is known about the mechanisms and foundation for the rise of this
class, but a few hypothetical explanations can be given. On some occasions, it was
the modest development of capitalism of a provincial nature, on other occasions
it followed essentially ethnic lines. In some cases, it was supported by mechanisms
guaranteed by the colonial power (e.g. control over rural labour and the commu-
nity funds of the municipalities), and in others, it was not like this at all. Larkin
contrasts the formation of an active agrarian middle class in Pampanga, a prov-
ince of plains, but not among the Tagalog people around Manila, an area settled
by the Spanish for the purpose of producing rice supplies for Manila.16 In the
latter case, the mix of variables in the process was complex, and all variables
interacted, both provincial and related to ethnic differentiation. In addition, in its
interior, a very dynamic mestizo population, the Chinese-Philippine segment,
asserted itself. Using the mechanisms of local power provided by the Spaniards
(the so-called principalía indígena), it had convenient and easy access to both land
and peasant labour.17 On other occasions, the State’s new fiscal policies completely
clashed with the interests of the traders of alcohol (from sugar cane) and tobacco,
who were forced to abandon those activities.
Third, there was the whole web of economic activities in the Philippines related
to the economic foundation of the imperial system itself. The first element of that
web is groups of traders in Manila with interests in the trans-Pacific system. Some
were from Acapulco or Mexico City, as a natural result of more than two centuries
of monopolistic trade. Others were Spaniards, who the state had rewarded with
boletas (licenses) which allowed them to ship cargo in authorised vessels. Some of
them worked for themselves, while many others were little more than intermedi-
aries for the institutions that provided credit, particularly the ‘sacred works’ of the
powerful Catholic church in the Philippines.
Finally, there were the alcaldes mayores (provincial mayors) or those who had held
that office (the most important of provincial offices, with an average duration of
six years). Thanks to their position, they used corvée peasant labour assigned by
the state for different economic activities and for their own personal enrichment.
The alcaldes mayores were the government’s agents in the provinces, but at the same
time they were obliged to guarantee the trade of food from the interior to Manila.
Along these different paths, without the emergence of a recognisably dominant
sector, this proto-middle class formed itself. By the mid-nineteenth century, the
seeds of a relatively powerful social sector had taken root, at a time when the
changes in the interior of the Philippines and in the country’s relationship with
15 For everything relating to Philippine foreign trade, one should consult Legarda, After the Galleons.
16 Larkin, Pampangans; Larkin, Sugar.
17 Wickberg, Chinese mestizo.
© Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and the Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand 2004
The historical origins of the Philippine economy: a survey of recent research of the Spanish colonial era 311
18 Fradera, Filipinas.
19 On these political entities, see Warren, Sulu Zone; Warren, Iranun and Balangigi.
© Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and the Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand 2004
312 Josep M. Fradera
© Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and the Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand 2004
The historical origins of the Philippine economy: a survey of recent research of the Spanish colonial era 313
expansion is the production and export of Manila hemp, a plant fibre vital for
the merchant navies of many countries. Owen gave a very detailed description of
the characteristics of this sector and of the social groups that grew with it.24 On
many occasions, the most solid nucleus of the Philippine middle class had a very
pronounced ethnic characteristic: Chinese or Chinese-Philippine. Until the 1850s,
restrictions on the mobility and immigration of the Chinese contributed to main-
taining an important and hardly discussed role for the mestizos de Sangley minority,
the social group that would most enthusiastically claim the concept of ‘Filipino’
ethnicity for itself, as opposed to the majority of local ‘Indians’ and also the
Spanish colonisers.25 From this time on, they competed with a minority of genuine
Chinese.26 Case studies demonstrated the crucial function of both groups in the
main cities or in credit activities in rural areas, as occurred in the tobacco regions
under state control.27
The model of development described thus far, with important roles for the
colonial state and a dynamic middle class involved in export industries, contains
a contradiction that surfaced during 1875–85. In the Philippines, the Spanish had
found a successful response to the break-up of the Spanish empire: fiscal monop-
olies and the unstoppable progression of tax collection on the basis of sustained
population growth and expansion of the area where tax was collected.28 As the
fiscal monopolies taxed consumption, the development of native Filipino business
was not impeded. The problem stemmed from the fact that the Philippines were
a colony and subject to the exploitative intentions of its metropolis.
From the mid-1830s, the government in Spain sought to benefit from the
successful tobacco monopoly, based on the quality and apparent very elastic
supply of tobacco for both local and international markets. Encouraged by the
flagging public finances in the metropolis, it began to demand increasing supplies
of tobacco from the colony for sale for the benefit of the government in Spain.29
The financial burden on the colonial administration increased to the extent that
it was forced to suspend the alcohol monopoly in 1863 and pay rural tobacco
producers with paper vouchers in the absence of coins. This burden imposed by
the metropolis encouraged deep rural discontent that evolved into banditry
(tulisanismo) in some areas, and finally to the decline of income for the colonial
administration. In the 1870s, it became clear that the tobacco monopoly was
inefficient, corruption-ridden, a burden on the rural population and a source of
popular discontent.
In 1882, the tobacco monopoly was abolished and the public finances were
reorganised on the basis of customs duties and new direct taxes on industry and
© Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and the Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand 2004
314 Josep M. Fradera
30 This change in fiscal policy can be seen in its results in Roldán de Montaud, La hacienda pública
filipina.
31 Giralt Raventós, Compañía General de Tabacos; Izard, Dependencia y colonialismo.
32 Rodrigo Alharilla, Línea de vapores-correo.
33 Delgado, Bajo dos banderas.
© Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and the Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand 2004
The historical origins of the Philippine economy: a survey of recent research of the Spanish colonial era 315
changes in the fiscal regime during 1882–1883, but also from other forms of
support. The main reason was that Spain perceived the Philippines as the basis
for the colonial future of the country, even though the unfolding crisis in Cuba
foretold a conflict with the US and end to Spain’s colonial ambitions. After the
1885 Berlin Congress, the effective colonisation of the Philippines became a
fundamental element of Spanish foreign policy.34 In that context, the Spanish
government organised a large Philippines exhibition in Madrid in 1887 and a
smaller one in Barcelona in 1888.35
The key figure driving this development in Spanish policy was Victor Balaguer,
a liberal Catalan politician, who propagated the retreat of the state as an eco-
nomic force in the Philippine archipelago.36 These initiatives were part of the
effort to entice Spanish investors. At the same time, they reinforced the state’s
authority in the colony. Young Filipino students attending the exhibitions in
Madrid or Barcelona were incensed by ethnographic presentations of the different
ethnic groups in the archipelago. They emphasised the archipelago’s internal
differences and its cultural backwardness relative to the metropolis: a clear dem-
onstration of Spain’s intention to recolonise the Philippines.
Spain’s economic intentions toward the colony became increasingly clear. A
striking aspect was the tariff policy of the 1880s, which culminated in the 1891
Trade Relations Law, which was protectionist in favour of Spain and the Philip-
pines.37 Spain lowered duties on the importation of sugar, tobacco, coffee and
some other products, of obvious importance in the case of the Philippines. This
tariff revision had a considerable impact on Philippine foreign trade. In effect, it
was an important stimulus for Spanish companies and their subsidiaries in the
colony. Spain’s exports to the Philippines increased. In contrast, Philippine exports
to Spain remained at modest levels, with the exception of leaf tobacco traded by
Tabacos de Filipinas and other Spanish and foreign companies established in the
Philippines.38
Until the end of Spanish colonial rule in 1898 exports of textiles and foodstuffs
from Spain to the Philippines increased quickly, displacing Spanish exports to
other European countries.39 During the 1880s, the share of Spanish textiles in
Philippine imports reached levels between 26 and 42 per cent, In terms of
quantity, Spain’s exports of textiles increased from an annual average of 826 tons
during 1880–84, to 6891 tons during 1895–99.40 Despite protection of Spanish
trade interests, the trade policies of the Philippines were more liberal than they
had been before. Consequently, Philippines exports increased significantly, par-
34 On this change in the political situation and its impact on the Philippines and the small Spanish
enclaves in the Pacific, see Elizalde Pérez-Grueso, España en el Pacífico.
35 Sánchez Gómez, Un Imperio en la Vitrina.
36 Palomas Moncholí, Víctor Balaguer, pp. 561–84.
37 Legarda, After the Gallions, pp. 202–4.
38 An excellent example of this can be found in Salazar, Baer and Co.
39 For the analysis of the evolution of Spanish textile exports, see Sudrià, Exportación en el
desarrollo.
40 Sudrià, Exportación en el desarrollo, p. 156.
© Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and the Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand 2004
316 Josep M. Fradera
ticularly exports of Manila hemp and sugar. The aftermath of the 1895 Philippine
revolution abruptly ended the growth of Philippine exports in general and of
imports of manufactures from Spain.
41 Fradera, Ciudadanía.
42 I will just refer to the studies of Ileto, Pasyon and Revolutions and Filipinos and their Revolution.
43 For some aspects of interest related to all of this, see the classic study Schumacher, Propaganda
Movement, and essays of the same author in Making of a Nation.
44 For information on how the certain groups in the rural society used the mechanisms of power
institutionalized by the State in the colony, see Guerrero, Provincial and municipal elites.
45 There are some indications in McLennan, Changing human ecology.
46 There are some glimpses in Fegan, Social history.
© Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and the Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand 2004
The historical origins of the Philippine economy: a survey of recent research of the Spanish colonial era 317
CONCLUSION
At the start of the twentieth century, the Philippines had several important eco-
nomic assets: the formation of a native elite; an important process of economic
integration between the different provinces; links with international capital mar-
kets; a significant development of export-orientated agriculture consisting of both
plantations and smallholders; and, finally, a large degree of openness of its econ-
omy to international trade. On the other hand, the Philippine economy was
forced to endure economic distortions caused by a new system of colonial rule
until the establishment of Japanese rule in 1942.50 Still, there was continuity across
the Spanish and American years. Most relevant was the continued inequality in
access to land. The American administration promised agrarian reform in 1901.
However, the reforms in effect reinforced the position of a ruling class that was
friendly to the American colonial government and failed to resolve the endemic
problem of the concentration of land ownership.51
This brief survey elaborated some hypotheses about the first stage of Philippine
economic development on the basis of recent studies. What may appear to have
been an autonomous development of native Philippine rural capitalism and of a
stratum of medium-sized traders since the end of the eighteenth century, was
47 Delgado, Menos se perdió. On the origin of the privileged position of the Church in the
Philippines in relation to land ownership, see Cushner, Landed Estates and Roth, Friar Estates.
48 Taylor, Philippine Insurrection.
49 For a comparison of agricultural development in the Philippines, Thailand and Indonesia, which
in large part overestimates the development of the plantation during the Spanish colonial and
American periods, see Hayami, Ecology, history, and development.
50 McCoy, An Anarchy of Families; Hutchcroft, Booty Capitalism.
51 Some insights of this crucial problem in Riedinger, Agrarian Reform.
© Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and the Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand 2004
318 Josep M. Fradera
REFERENCES
Aguilar, F. (1994) Beyond inevitability: The opening of Philippine provincial ports in 1855. Journal of
Southeast Asian Studies, 25, 70–90.
Anderson, B. (1995) Cacique democracy in the Philippines: Origins and dreams. In: Rafael, V., ed.
Discrepant Histories: Translocal Essays on Filipino Cultures (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
Bauzon, L. E. (1981) Deficit Government: Mexico and the Philippine Situado (1606–1804). (Tokyo: Centre
for East Asian Cultural Studies).
Cheong, W. E. (1970) Changing the rules of the game: the India-Manila trade, 1785–1809. Journal
of Southeast Asian Studies, 1, 1–19.
Cheong, W. E. (1971) The decline of Manila as the Spanish entrepôt in the Far East, 1785–1826: Its
impact on the pattern of Southeast Asian trade. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 2, 142–158.
Cortes, R. M. (1974) Pangasinan, 1572–1800. (Quezon City: New Day Publishers).
Cullinane, M. (1982) The changing nature of the Cebu urban elite in the 19th century. In: McCoy,
A. W., and De Jesus, E., eds. (1982) Philippine Social History: Global Trade and Local Transformations
(Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press).
Cushner, N. P., ed. (1971) Documents Illustrating the British Conquest of Manila, 1762–1763. (London: Royal
Historical Society).
Cushner, N. P. (1971) Spain in the Philippines. (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press).
Cushner, N. P. (1976) Landed Estates in the Colonial Philippines. (New Haven: Yale University Press).
De Jesús, E. C. (1980) The Tobacco Monopoly in the Philippines: Bureaucratic Enterprise Social Change, 1766–
1880. (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press).
De Jesús, E. (1982) Control and compromise in the Cagayan Valley. In: McCoy, A. W., and De Jesus,
E., eds. (1982) Philippine Social History: Global Trade and Local Transformations (Quezon City: Ateneo
de Manila University Press).
Delgado, J. M. (1996) Bajo dos banderas (1881–1910): Sobre cómo sobrevivió la Compañía General
de Filipinas al Desastre de, 1898. In: Orovio, C. N., Puig-Samper, M. A., and Mora, L. M. G.,
eds. La Nación Soñada: Cuba, Puerto Rico Y Filipinas Ante el 98. (Madrid: Ediciones Doce Calles).
Delgado, J. M. (1999) ‘Menos se perdió en Cuba’, la dimensión asiática del 98. Illes I Imperis, 2, 49–62.
Díaz-Trechuelo, M. L. (1965) La Real Compañía de Filipinas. (Seville: Escuela de Estudios Hispano-
Americanos).
Doeppers, D. F., and Xenos, P., eds. (1998) Population and History: The Demographic Origins of the Modern
Philippines, (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press).
Elizalde Pérez-Grueso, M. D. (1992) España En El Pacífico: la Colonia de Las Islas Carolinas. (Madrid:
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas).
© Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and the Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand 2004
The historical origins of the Philippine economy: a survey of recent research of the Spanish colonial era 319
Elizalde, M. D., Fradera, J. M., and Alonso, L., eds. (2001) Imperios y Naciones en el Pacífico (Madrid:
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas).
Fegan, B. (1982) The social history of a Central Luzon barrio. In: McCoy, A. W., and De Jesus, E.,
eds. (1982) Philippine Social History: Global Trade and Local Transformations (Quezon City: Ateneo de
Manila University Press).
Fenner, B. L. (1985) Cebu Under the Spanish Flag (1521–1896): an Economic Social History. (Cebu: San
Carlos Publications).
Fradera, J. M. (1996) El estanco del tabaco y la reforma de la hacienda filipina, 1760–1860. In: Comín,
F., and Vallejo, R., eds. La Reforma Fiscal de Mon-Santillán Ciento Cincuenta Años Después. (Madrid:
Hacienda Publica Española).
Fradera, J. M. (1999) Filipinas, la Colonia més Peculiar: La Hacienda Pública en la Definición de la Política
Colonial, 1762–1868. (Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas).
Fradera, J. M. (1999) Opio y negocio, o las desventuras de un español en China. In: Fradera, J. M.
Gobernar Colonias. (Barcelona: Ediciones Península).
Fradera, J. M. (2004) Ciudadanía, ciudadanía congelada y súbditos residuales: tres situaciones bajo
un mismo Estado. Illes I Imperis, 7, 113–134.
Gamella, J. F., and Martín, E. (1992) Las rentas del anfión: El monopolio del opio en las Filipinas
(1844–1898). Revista de Indias, 53, 61–106.
Giralt Raventós, E. (1981) La Compañía General de Tabacos de Filipinas, 1881–1981. (Barcelona: Com-
pañía General de Tabacos de Filipinas).
Guerrero, M. C. (1982) The provincial and municipal elites of Luzon during the revolution, 1898–
1902. In: McCoy, A. W., and De Jesus, E., eds. (1982) Philippine Social History: Global Trade and
Local Transformations (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press).
Hayami, Y. (2001) Ecology, history, and development: a perspective from rural Southeast Asia. World
Bank Research Observer, 16, 169–198.
Hutchcroft, P. D. (1998) Booty Capitalism: the Politics of Banking in the Philippines. (Ithaca: Cornell
University Press).
Ileto, R. C. (1979) Pasyon and Revolution Popular Movements in the Philippines, 1840–1910. (Quezon City:
Ateneo de Manila University Press).
Ileto, R. C. (1998) Filipinos and Their Revolution: Event, Discourse and Historiography (Quezon City: Ateneo
de Manila University Press).
Izard, M. (1974) Dependencia y colonialismo: La Compañía General de Tabacos de Filipinas. Moneda
Y Crédito, 130, 47–89.
Laarhoven, R. (1989) The Triumph of Moro Diplomacy: the Maguindanao Sultanate in the 17th Century (Quezon
City: New Day Publishers).
Larkin, J. A., ed. (1979) Perspectives on Philippine Historiography. A Symposium. (New Haven: Yale
University Press).
Larkin, J. (1972) The Pampangans: Colonial Society in a Philippine Province. (Berkeley: University of Califor-
nia Press).
Larkin, J. (1993) Sugar and the Origins of Modern Philippine Society. (Berkeley: University of California
Press).
Legarda, B. L. (1999) After the Galleons: Foreign Trade, Economic Change and Entrepreneurship in the Nineteenth
Century Philippines. (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press).
McCoy, A. W., ed. (1994) An Anarchy of Families: State and Family in the Philippines (Quezon City: Ateneo
de Manila University Press).
McCoy, A. W. (1982) A queen dies slowly: The rise and decline of Iloilo City. In: McCoy, A. W., and
De Jesus, E., eds. (1982) Philippine Social History: Global Trade and Local Transformations (Quezon
City: Ateneo de Manila University Press).
McCoy, A. W., and De Jesus, E., eds. (1982) Philippine Social History: Global Trade and Local Transformations
(Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press).
McLennan, M. (1982) Changing human ecology on the Central Luzon Plain: Nueva Ecija, 1705–
1939. In: McCoy, A. W., and De Jesus, E., eds. (1982) Philippine Social History: Global Trade and
Local Transformations (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press).
Owen, N. (1984) Prosperity Without Progress: Manila Hemp and Material Life in the Colonial Philippines.
(Berkeley: University of California Press).
Owen, N. G. (1987) The paradox of 19th Century population growth in Southeast Asia: Evidence
from Java and the Philippines. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 18, 45–57.
Palomas Moncholí, J. (2004) Víctor Balaguer: Renaixença, Revolució I Progrés (Vilanova i la Geltrú: Antina).
© Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and the Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand 2004
320 Josep M. Fradera
Phelan, J. L. (1967) The Hispanization of the Philippines, Spanish Aims and Filipino Responses, 1562–1700.
(Madison: Wisconsin University Press).
Reed, R. R. (1978) Colonial Manila: the Context of Hispanic Urbanism and Process of Morphonogenesis.
(Berkeley: University of California Press).
Resnick, S. A. (1970) The decline in rural industry under export expansion: a comparison among
Burma, Philippines and Thailand, 1870–1938. Journal of Economic History, 30, 51–73.
Riedinger, J. M. (1995) Agrarian Reform in the Philippines: Democratic Transitions and Redistributive Reform.
(Stanford: Stanford University Press).
Rodrigo Alharilla, M. (1998) La línea de vapores-correo España-Filipinas (1879–1905). Cuadernos de
Historia (Instituto Cervantes, Manila), 2–3, 133–150.
Roldán de Montaud, I. (2001) La hacienda pública filipina de 1800 a 1898. In: Elizalde, M. D.,
Fradera, J. M., and Alonso, L., eds. (2001) Imperios y Naciones en el Pacífico (Madrid: Consejo
Superior de Investigaciones Científicas).
Roth, D. M. (1977) The Friar Estates of the Philippines (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press).
Routledge, D. (1979) Diego Silang and the Origins of Philippine Nationalism. (Quezon City: Philippine Center
for Advanced Studies).
Salazar, W. (2001) Baer and the transformation of the Philippine tobacco industry. In: Elizalde, M.
D., Fradera, J. M., and Alonso, L., eds. (2001) Imperios y Naciones en el Pacífico (Madrid: Consejo
Superior de Investigaciones Científicas).
Sánchez Gómez, L. A. (2003) Un Imperio en la Vitrina: El Colonialismo Español en el Pacífico y la Exposición
de Filipinas en 1887. (Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas).
Schumacher, J. (1973) The Propaganda Movement 1880–1895: the Creators of a Filipino Consciousness, the
Makers of a Revolution. (Manila: Solidaridad Publishing House).
Schumacher, J. (1991) The Making of a Nation: Essays on Nineteenth-Century Filipino Nationalism. (Quezon
City: Ateneo de Manila University Press).
Schurz, W. L. (1939) The Manilla Galleon. (New York: E.P. Dutton & Co).
Sturtevant, D. (1976) Popular Uprisings in the Philippines, 1840–1940. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
Sudrià, C. (1983) La exportación en el desarrollo de la industria algodonera española, 1875–1920.
Revista de Historia Económica, 2, 369–386.
Taylor, J. (1971) The Philippine Insurrection Against the United States (Pasay City: Eugenio Lopez Founda-
tion) 3 volumes.
Tepaske, J. J. (1983) New world silver: Castile and the Philippines, 1590–1800. In: Richards, J. F., ed.
Precious Metals in the Later Medieval and Early Modern Worlds. (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
Warren, J. F. (1981) The Sulu Zone 1768–1898: Dynamics of External Trade. (Singapore: Singapore
University Press).
Warren, J. F. (2003) Iranun and Balangigi: Globalization, Maritime Raiding and the Birth of Ethnicity. (Sin-
gapore: Singapore University Press).
Wickberg, E. (1964) The Chinese mestizo in Philippine history. Journal of Southeast Asian History, 5, 62–
100.
Wickberg, E. (1965) The Chinese in Philippine Life (New Haven: Yale University Press).
© Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and the Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand 2004