Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The Rules of Court is applicable in ALL COURTS, EXCEPT RULE MAKING POWER OF THE SUPREME
as otherwise provided by the SC [Rule 1, Sec. 2]. COURT
It governs the procedure to be observed in CIVIL or Judicial Power includes the duty of the courts of justice to
CRIMINAL actions and SPECIAL proceedings [Rule 1, Sec. settle actual controversies involving rights, which are
3]. legally demandable and enforceable, and to determine
whether or not there has been grave abuse of discretion
It does not apply to the following cases: amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of
1. Election cases, any branch or instrumentality of the Government (Sec. 1,
2. Land registration cases, Art. VIII, 1987 Constitution)
3. Cadastral cases
4. Naturalization cases, The power of judicial review is the SC’s power to declare a
5. Insolvency proceedings law, treaty, international or executive agreement,
6. Other cases not herein provided for presidential decree, proclamation, order, instruction,
ordinance, or regulation unconstitutional
Except by analogy or in a suppletory character
and whenever practicable and convenient [Rule Sec. 5(5), Art. VIII, of the 1987 Constitution provides that
4, Sec. 4] that the Supreme Court shall have the power to:
1. promulgate rules concerning the protection and
Prospectivity/ Retroactivity enforcement of constitutional rights, pleading,
practice, and procedure in all courts;
The Rules of Court are not penal statutes and cannot be 2. admission to the practice of law;
given retroactive effect [Bermejo v Barrios (1970)]. 3. the Integrated Bar;
4. and legal assistance to the underprivileged
Rules of procedure may be made applicable to actions
pending and undetermined at the time of their passage,
and are deemed retroactive in that sense and to that Limitations on the rule-making power of the Supreme
extent. [In the Matter to Declare in Contempt of Court Hon. Court
Simeon Datumanong (2006)].
1
application of the laws to controversies brought before it
Sec 5(5) of Art. VIII of the Constitution sets forth the (and) as well as the public administration of justice.
limitations to the power:
1. That the rules shall provide a simplified and Generally, the term describes an organ of the government
inexpensive procedure for speedy disposition of consisting of one person or of several persons, called
cases; upon and authorized to administer justice. It is also the
2. That the rules shall be uniform for courts of the place where justice is administered. [Riano citing Black’s
same grade; and and Am. Jur. and C. J. S.]
3. That the rules shall not diminish, increase or
modify substantive rights.
Court as Distinguished from a Judge
Power of the Supreme Court to Amend and Suspend
Procedural Rules COURT JUDGE
A tribunal officially
Power to Amend Remedial Laws assembled under An officer of such tribunal
1. The constitutional faculty of the Court to authority of law
promulgate rules of practice and procedure An organ of the
necessarily carries with it the power to overturn government with a The judge is the one who
judicial precedents on points of remedial law personality separate from “sits” in court
through the amendment of the Rules of Court. the person or judge
[Pinga v Heirs of Santiago (2006)]. A being in imagination
2. The SC has the sole prerogative to amend, repeal, A physical and natural
comparable to a
or even establish new rules for a more simplified person
corporation
and inexpensive process, and the speedy May be considered an
disposition of case [Neypes v CA (2005)] A public officer
office
Power to Suspend Remedial Laws The circumstances of the court are not affected by the
1. It is within the inherent power of the Supreme circumstance that would affect the judge. The continuity of
Court to suspend its own rules in a particular a court and the efficacy of its proceedings are not affected
case in order to do justice [De Guia v De Guia by the death, resignation, or cessation from the service of
(2001)]. the judge presiding over it. In other words, the judge may
2. When the operation of rules will lead to an resign, become incapacitated, or be disqualified to hold
injustice or if their application tends to subvert office, but the court remains. The death of the judge does
and defeat instead of promote and enhance not mean the death of the court [Riano citing ABC Davao
justice, their suspension is justified [Republic v Auto Supply v. CA (1998)].
CA (1978)].
3. There is no absolute rule as to what constitutes Classification of Philippine Courts
good and sufficient cause that will merit 1. Courts of original and appellate jurisdiction
suspension of the rules. The matter is 2. Courts of general and special jurisdiction
discretionary upon the Court [Republic v 3. Constitutional and statutory courts
Imperial Jr. (1999)]. 4. Courts of law and equity
4. The bare invocation of "the interest of substantial 5. Superior and Inferior Courts
justice" is not a magic wand that will 6. Courts of record and not of record
automatically compel this Court to suspend
procedural rules [Ramos v Sps Lavendia (2008)]. Courts of original and appellate jurisdiction
5. Procedural rules are not to be belittled or
dismissed simply because their non-observance Courts of original jurisdiction – Those courts in which,
may have resulted in prejudice to a party's under the law, actions or proceedings may be originally
substantive rights. Like all rules, they are commenced.
required to be followed except only for the most
persuasive of reasons when they may be relaxed Courts of appellate jurisdiction – Courts which have the
to relieve a litigant of an injustice not power to review on appeal the decisions or orders of a
commensurate with the degree of his lower court. [Regalado]
thoughtlessness in not complying with the
procedure prescribed. [Polanco v Cruz (2009)]. Courts of general and special jurisdiction
Constitutional courts – Those which owe their creation When the doctrine/principle may be disregarded: A direct
and existence to the Constitution and, therefore cannot be recourse of the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction to
legislated out of existence or deprived by law of the issue writs (referring to the writs of certiorari,
jurisdiction and powers unqualifiedly vested in them by prohibition, or mandamus) should be allowed only when
the Constitution. e.g. Supreme Court; Sandiganbayan is a there are special and important reasons therefor, clearly
constitutionally-mandated court but created by statute. and specifically set out in the petition. [Mangahas v.
Paredes (2007)]. The Supreme Court may disregard the
Statutory courts – Those created, organized and with principle of hierarchy of courts if warranted by the nature
jurisdiction exclusively determined by law. [Regalado] and importance of the issues raised in the interest of
speedy justice and avoid future litigations [Riano].
Courts of law and equity
Doctrine of Non-Interference or Doctrine of Judicial
Courts of Law- Those courts which administer the law of Stability
the land. They settle cases according to law.
The principle holds that courts of equal and coordinate
Courts of Equity- Those courts which rules according to jurisdiction cannot interfere with each other’s orders
the precepts of equity or justice. They settle cases [Lapu-lapu Development and Housing Corp. v. Group
according to the principles of equity referring to Management Corp.(2002)] The principle also bars a court
principles of justice, fainess and fair play. from reviewing or interfering with the judgment of a co-
equal court over which it has no appellate jurisdiction or
Philippine courts are both courts of law and equity. power of review [Villamor v. Salas (1991)].
Hence, both legal and equitable jurisdiction is dispensed
with in the same tribunal [U.S. v. Tamparong (1998)] The doctrine of non-interference applies with equal force
to administrative bodies. When the law provides for an
Superior and Inferior Courts appeal from the decision of an administrative body to the
SC or CA, it means that such body is co-equal with the RTC
Superior courts – Courts which have the power of review in terms of rank and stature, and logically beyond the
or supervision over another and lower court. control of the latter [Phil Sinter Corp. v. Cagayan Electric
Power (2002)].
Inferior courts – Those which, in relation to another
court, are lower in rank and subject to review and General Rule: No court has the authority to interfere by
supervision by the latter. [Regalado] injunction with the judgment of another court of
coordinate jurisdiction or to pass upon or scrutinize and
Courts of record and not of record much less declare as unjust a judgment of another court
Courts of record – Those whose proceedings are enrolled Exception: The doctrine of judicial stability does not apply
and which are bound to keep a written record of all trials where a third party claimant is involved
and proceedings handled by them. [Regalado] One
attribute of a court of record is the strong presumption as
to the veracity of its records that cannot be collaterally
attacked except for fraud. All Philippine courts, including
inferior courts, are now courts of record. [Riano]
3
JURISDICTION JURISDICTION OVER THE SUBJECT MATTER
The manner by which the court acquires jurisdiction over Error of jurisdiction Error of judgment
the parties depends on whether the party is the plaintiff
or the defendant. It is one which the court
may commit in the
The mode of acquisition of jurisdiction over the plaintiff exercise of its jurisdiction
It is one where the act
and the defendant applies both to ordinary and special [Cabrera v. Lapid (2006)].
complained of was issued
civil actions. It includes errors of
by the court without or in
procedure or mistakes in
excess of jurisdiction
How jurisdiction over the PLAINTIFF is acquired - the court’s mistakes in the
[Cabrera v. Lapid (2006)].
Jurisdiction over the plaintiff is acquired by filing of the court’s findings [Banco
complaint or petition. By doing so, he submits himself to Filipino Savings v. CA
the jurisdiction of the court [Davao Light & Power Co., Inc. (2000)]
v CA (1991)]. Correctible only by the
extraordinary writ of Correctible by appeal
How jurisdiction over the DEFENDANT is acquired - certiorari [Cabrera v Lapid [Cabrera v Lapid (2006)]
Acquired by the (2006)]
1. Voluntary appearance or submission by the Ground for reversal only if
defendant or respondent to the court or Renders a judgment void or it is shown that prejudice
2. By coercive process issued by the court to him, voidable [Rule 16 Sec. 1, has been caused [Banco
generally by the service of summons [de Joya v. Rule 65] Español-Filipino v Palanca
Marquez (2006), citing Regalado] (1918)]
4
2. It is conferred only by the Constitution or the law. The court, once jurisdiction has been acquired, retains
that jurisdiction until it finally disposes of the case
3. Jurisdiction CANNOT be: [Bantua v. Mercader (2001)].
a. Fixed by agreement of the parties;
b. Cannot be acquired through, or waived, As a consequence, jurisdiction is not affected by a new
enlarged or diminished by, any act or law placing a proceeding under the jurisdiction of another
omission of the parties; tribunal, EXCEPT:
c. Neither can it be conferred by the 1. Where there is an express provision in the
acquiescence of the court [Regalado citing De statute
Jesus v Garcia (1967)]. 2. The statute is clearly intended to apply to actions
d. Cannot be subject to compromise [Civil Code, pending before its enactment [Riano citing People
Art 2035] v. Cawaling (1998)].
Courts cannot and will not resolve a controversy General Rule: Estoppel does not apply to confer
involving a question which is within the jurisdiction of an jurisdiction to a tribunal that has none over a cause of
administrative tribunal, especially where the question action. Jurisdiction is conferred by law. Where there is
demands the exercise of sound administrative discretion none, no agreement of the parties can provide one. Settled
requiring the special knowledge, experience and services is the rule that the decision of a tribunal not vested with
of the administrative tribunal to determine technical and appropriate jurisdiction is null and void. [SEAFDEC-AQD v.
intricate matters of fact [Paloma v. Mora (2005)]. NLRC (1992)]
Objective is to guide a court in determining whether it Exception: Participation in all stages of the case before the
should refrain from exercising its jurisdiction until after trial court, that included invoking its authority in asking
an administrative agency has determined some question for affirmative relief, effectively barred petitioner by
or some aspect of some question arising in the proceeding estoppel from challenging the court’s jurisdiction. [Soliven
before the court [Riano citing Omictin v. CA (2007)] v. Fastforms (2004)]
Jurisdiction over the res may be acquired by the court 3. Inclusion and exclusion of voters
1. By placing the property or thing under its
custody (custodia legis) 4. Those governed by the Rules on Summary
a. The seizure of the thing under legal process Procedure
whereby it is brought into actual custody of a. Forcible entry and unlawful detainer (FEUD)
law (1) With jurisdiction to resolve issue of
b. Example: attachment of property. ownership to determine ONLY issue of
2. Through statutory authority conferring upon it possession (provisional only)
the power to deal with the property or thing (2) Irrespective of the amount of damages or
within the court’s territorial jurisdiction unpaid rentals sought to be recover
a. Institution of a legal proceeding wherein the (3) Where attorney’s fees are awarded, the
power of the court over the thing is same shall not exceed P20,000
recognized and made effective b. Other civil cases, except probate proceeding,
b. Example: suits involving the status of the where the total amount of the plaintiff’s
parties or suits involving the property in the claim does not exceed P200,000 in MM,
Philippines of non-resident defendants. exclusive of interests and costs.
NOTE: It is a condition precedent under Rule 16; can be JURISDICTION OF FAMILY COURTS (RA 8369)
dismissed but without prejudice a. Petitions for guardianship, custody of
children and habeas corpus involving
children
JURISDICTION OF THE REGIONAL TRIAL b. Petitions for adoption of children and the
COURTS, FAMILY COURTS, AND SHARI’A revocation thereof
c. Complaints for annulment of marriage,
COURTS declaration of nullity of marriage and those
relating to status and property relations of
JURISDICTION OF THE RTC IN CIVIL CASES husband and wife or those living together
under different status and agreements, and
General Original Jurisdiction All cases not within the petitions for dissolution of conjugal
exclusive jurisdiction of any court/tribunal/person/ body partnership of gains
exercising judicial or quasi-judicial functions d. Petitions for support and/or
acknowledgment
Exclusive Original Jurisdiction e. Summary judicial proceedings brought under
1. The action is incapable of pecuniary estimation the provisions of EO 209 (Family Code)
a. Such as rescission of contract, action to f. Petitions for declaration of status of children
revive judgment, declaratory relief (1st part), as abandoned, dependent or neglected
support, expropriation) children, petitions for voluntary or
b. If the action is primarily for the recovery of a involuntary commitment of children, the
sum of money, the claim is considered suspension, termination or restoration of
capable of pecuniary estimation, and parental authority and other cases
jurisdiction over the action will depend on cognizable under PD 603, EO 56 (1986) and
the amount of the claim. [RCPI v. CA (2002)] other related laws
c. If the basic issue is something other than the g. Petitions for the constitution of the family
right to recover a sum of money, if the money home
claim is purely incidental to, or a
consequence of, the principal relief sought, NOTE: In areas where there are no Family Courts,
the action is one where the subject of the the above-enumerated cases shall be adjudicated
litigation may not be estimated in terms of by the RTC (RA 8369)
money. [Soliven v. Fastforms (1992)]
5. To hear and decide intra-corporate
2. Title to, possession of, or interest in, real controversies, as per Sec. 52, Securities and
property with assessed value exceeding P20,000 Regulations Code
outside Metro Manila, or exceeds P50,000 in a. Cases involving devises or schemes
Metro Manila employed by or any acts, of the board of
a. Except: Forcible entry and unlawful detainer directors, business associates, its officers or
cases partnership, amounting to fraud and
misrepresentation which may be detrimental
3. If the amount involved exceeds P300,000 outside to the interest of the public and/or of the
Metro Manila or exceeds P400,000 in Metro stockholders, partners, members of
Manila in the following cases: associations or organizations registered with
a. Admiralty and maritime cases the SEC
b. Matters of Probate (testate and intestate) b. Controversies arising out of intra-corporate
c. Other actions involving personal property or partnership relations, between and among
d. Demand for money stockholders, members or associates;
between any or all of them and the
NOTE: The exclusion of the term “damages of corporation, partnership or association of
whatever kind” in determining the which they are stockholders, members or
jurisdictional amount under Sec. 19(8) and associates, respectively; and between such
Sec. 33 (1) of BP 129, as amended by RA corporation , partnership or association and
7691, applies to cases where the damages the state insofar as it concerns their
are merely incidental to or a consequence of individual franchise or right to exist as such
the main cause of action. However, if the entity
claim for damages is the main cause of
8
c. Controversies in the election or auxiliary writs and processes in aid of its
appointments of directors, trustees, officers appellate jurisdiction
or managers of such corporations,
partnerships or associations Concurrent Jurisdiction
d. Petitions of corporations, partnerships or 1. Petitions of Muslim for the constitution of the
associations to be declared in the state of family home, change of name and commitment of
suspension of payments in cases where the an insane person to an asylum
corporation, partnership of association 2. All other personal and legal actions not
possesses sufficient property to cover all its mentioned in par 1 (d) wherein the parties
debts but foresees the impossibility of involved are Muslims except those for forcible
meeting them when they respectively fall due entry and unlawful detainer, which shall fall
or in cases where the corporation, under the exclusive jurisdiction of the MTC.
partnership of association has no sufficient 3. All special civil actions for interpleader or
assets to cover its liabilities, but is under the declaratory relief wherein the parties are
management of a Rehabilitation Receiver or Muslims or the property involved belongs
Management Committee. exclusively to Muslims
Special Jurisdiction - SC may designate certain branches The Council is composed of the Clerk of Court as
of RTC to try exclusively criminal cases, juvenile and Chairperson and a representative of each of the
domestic relations cases, agrarian cases, urban land conflicting parties.
reform cases not falling within the jurisdiction of any
quasi-judicial body and other special cases in the interest
of justice. JURISDICTION OF THE SANDIGANBAYAN
Original Jurisdiction in all cases involving:
JURISDICTION OF THE SHARI’A COURTS 1. Violations of RA 3019 (Anti-Graft and Corrupt
Practices Act)
Exclusive Jurisdiction 2. Violations of RA 1379 (Anti-Ill-Gotten Wealth
1. All cases involving custody, guardianship, Act)
legitimacy, paternity and filiation arising under 3. Sequestration cases (E.O. Nos. 1,2,14,14-A)
the Code of Muslim Personal Laws; 4. Bribery (Chapter II, Sec. 2, Title VII, Book II, RPC)
2. All cases involving disposition, distribution and where one or more of the principal accused are
settlement of estate of deceased Muslims, occupying the following positions in the
probate of wills, issuance of letters of government, whether in permanent, acting or
administration of appointment administrators or interim capacity at the time of the commission of
executors regardless of the nature or aggregate the offense:
value of the property; a. Officials of the executive branch occupying
3. Petitions for the declaration of absence and death the positions of regional director and higher,
for the cancellation and correction of entries in otherwise classified as Grade 27 and higher,
the Muslim Registries; of the Compensation and Position
4. All actions arising from the customary contracts Classification Act of 1989 (RA 6758)
in which the parties are Muslims, if they have not b. Members of Congress and officials thereof
specified which law shall govern their relations; classified as G-27 and up under RA 6758
and c. Members of the Judiciary without prejudice
5. All petitions for mandamus, prohibition, to the provisions of the Constitution
injunction, certiorari, habeas corpus and all other
9
d. Chairmen and Members of the Constitutional b. other matters arising under the Customs law
Commissions without prejudice to the or other laws, part of laws or special laws
provisions of the Constitution administered by BOC;
e. All other national and local officials classified 5. Decisions of the Central Board of Assessment
as Grade 27 and higher under RA 6758 Appeals in the exercise of its appellate
f. Other offenses or felonies committed by the jurisdiction over cases involving the assessment
public officials and employees mentioned in and taxation of real property originally decided
Sec. 4(a) of RA 7975 as amended by RA 8249 by the provincial or city board of assessment
in relation to their office appeals;
g. Civil and criminal cases filed pursuant to and 6. Decision of the secretary of Finance on customs
in connection with EO Nos. 1, 2, 14-A (Sec. 4, cases elevated to him automatically for review
RA 8249) from decisions of the Commissioner of Customs
which are adverse to the government under Sec.
NOTE: Without the office, the crime cannot 2315 of the Tariff and Customs Code;
be committed. 7. Decisions of Secretary of Trade and Industry in
the case of non-agricultural product, commodity
Appellate Jurisdiction Over final judgments, resolutions or article, and the Secretary of Agriculture in the
or orders of the RTC whether in the exercise of their case of agricultural product, commodity or
original or appellate jurisdiction over crimes and civil article, involving dumping duties and
cases falling within the original exclusive jurisdiction of counterveiling duties under Secs. 301 and 302,
the Sandiganbayan but which were committed by public respectively, of the Tariff and Customs Code, and
officers below Salary Grade 27. safeguard measures under RA 8800, where either
party may appeal the decision to impose or not to
Concurrent Original Jurisdiction with SC, CA, and RTC impose said duties.
for petitions for writs of habeas data and amparo
Exclusive Original Jurisdiction
NOTE: The requisites that the offender the offender 1. Over all criminal cases arising from violation of
occupies salary Grade 27 and the offense must be the NIRC and the TCC and other laws, part of
intimately connected with the official function must laws, or special laws administered by the BIR or
concur for the SB to have jurisdiction the BOC where the principal amount of taxes and
fees, exclusive of charges and penalties claimed is
less than P1M or where there is no specified
JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF TAX amount claimed (the offenses or penalties shall
be tried by the regular courts and the jurisdiction
APPEALS of the CTA shall be appellate);
2. In tax collection cases involving final and
UNDER RA 9282 and RULE 5, AM 05-11-07 CTA executory assessments for taxes, fees, charges
and penalties where the principal amount of
Exclusive Original or Appellate Jurisdiction to Review taxes and fees, exclusive of charges and penalties
by Appeal: claimed is less than P1M tried by the proper MTC,
1. Decisions of CIR in cases involving disputed MeTC and RTC.
assessments, refunds of internal revenue taxes,
fees or other charges, penalties in relation Exclusive Appellate Jurisdiction
thereto, or other matters arising under the NIRC 1. In criminal offenses
or other laws administered by BIR; a. Over appeals from the judgment, resolutions
2. Inaction by CIR in cases involving disputed or orders of the RTC in tax cases originally
assessments, refunds of IR taxes, fees or other decided by them, in their respective
charges, penalties in relation thereto, or other territorial jurisdiction, and
matters arising under the NIRC or other laws b. Over petitions for review of the judgments,
administered by BIR, where the NIRC or other resolutions or orders of the RTC in the
applicable law provides a specific period of exercise of their appellate jurisdiction over
action, in which case the inaction shall be deemed tax cases originally decided by the MeTCs,
an implied denial; MTCs, and MCTCs in their respective
3. Decisions, orders or resolutions of the RTCs in jurisdiction.
local taxes originally decided or resolved by them 2. In tax collection cases
in the exercise of their original or appellate a. Over appeals from the judgments,
jurisdiction; resolutions or orders of the RTC in tax
4. Decisions of the Commissioner of Customs collection cases originally decided by them in
a. in cases involving liability for customs duties, their respective territorial jurisdiction; and
fees or other charges, seizure, detention or b. Over petitions for review of the judgments,
release of property affected, fines, forfeitures resolutions or orders of the RTC in the
or other penalties in relation thereto, or exercise of their appellate jurisdiction over
tax collection cases originally decided by the
10
MeTCs, MTCs and MCTCs in their respective 2. With the CA and RTC in petitions for certiorari,
jurisdiction. prohibition and mandamus against lower courts
and bodies and in petitions for quo warranto, and
writs of habeas corpus, all subject to the doctrine
JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS of hierarchy of courts.
3. With CA, RTC and Sandiganbayan for petitions for
JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS IN CIVIL writs of amparo and habeas data
CASES 4. Concurrent original jurisdiction with the RTC in
cases affecting ambassadors, public ministers and
Exclusive Original Jurisdiction in actions for annulment consuls.
of judgments of the RTC
Appellate Jurisdiction
Concurrent Original Jurisdiction 1. By way of petition for review on certiorari
1. With SC to issue writs of certiorari, prohibition (appeal by certiorari under Rule 45) against CA,
and mandamus against the RTC, CSC, CBAA, other Sandiganbayan, RTC on pure questions of law
quasi-judicial agencies mentioned in Rule 43, and and CTA in its decisions rendered en banc.
the NLRC (however, this should be filed first with 2. In cases involving the constitutionality or validity
the CA as per St. Martin Funeral Home case), and of a law or treaty, international or executive
writ of kalikasan. agreement, law, presidential decree,
2. With the SC and RTC to issue writs of certiorari, proclamation, order, instruction, ordinance or
prohibition and mandamus against lower courts regulation, legality of a tax, impost, assessment,
and bodies and writs of quo warranto, habeas toll or penalty, jurisdiction of a lower court; and
corpus, whether or not in aid of its appellate 3. All cases in which the jurisdiction of any court is
jurisdiction, and writ of continuing mandamus on in issue;
environmental cases. 4. All cases in which an error or question of law is
3. With SC, RTC and Sandiganbayan for petitions for involved
writs of amparo and habeas data where the 5. The SC may resolve factual issues in certain
action involves public data or government office exceptional circumstances (Josefa v. Zhandong,
2003)
Exclusive Appellate Jurisdiction a. The conclusion is grounded on speculations/
1. By way of ordinary appeal from the RTC and the surmises /conjectures
Family Courts. b. The inference is manifestly
2. By way of petition for review from the RTC mistaken/absurd/impossible;
rendered by the RTC in the exercise of its c. There is grave abuse of discretion;
appellate jurisdiction. d. The judgment is based on a misapprehension
3. By way of petition for review from the decisions, of facts;
resolutions, orders or awards of the CSC, CBAA e. The findings of fact are conflicting;
and other bodies mentioned in Rule 43 and of the f. There is no citation of specific evidence on
Office of the Ombudsman in administrative which the factual findings are based;
disciplinary cases. g. The finding of absence of facts is
4. Over decisions of MTCs in cadastral or land contradicted by the presence of evidence on
registration cases pursuant to its delegated record;
jurisdiction; this is because decisions of MTCs in h. The findings of the CA are contrary to those
these cases are appealable in the same manner as of the trial court;
decisions of RTCs. i. The CA manifestly overlooked certain
relevant and undisputed facts that, if
properly considered, would justify a different
JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT conclusion;
j. The findings of the CA are beyond the issues
JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CIVIL of the case;
CASES k. Such findings are contrary to the admissions
of both parties.
Exclusive Original Jurisdiction in petitions for
certiorari, prohibition and mandamus against the CA,
COMELEC, COA, CTA, Sandiganbayan
TOTALITY RULE
Concurrent Original Jurisdiction
1. With Court of Appeals in petitions for certiorari, Where there are several claims or causes of actions
prohibition and mandamus against the RTC, CSC, between the same or different parties, embodied in the
Central Board of Assessment Appeals, NLRC, same complaint, the amount of the demand shall be the
Quasi-judicial agencies, and writ of kalikasan, all totality of the claims in all the claims of action,
subject to the doctrine of hierarchy of courts. irrespective of whether the causes of action arose out of
the same or different transactions (Sec. 33[1], BP 129).
11
12
COMMENCEMENT OF
(3) As to cause or foundation
(a) Real, or
(b) Personal
13
Personal Actions: All other actions are personal actions.
E.g. Action to recover real E.g. Action to recover sum
[Rule 4, Sec.2]
property of money
Importance of Distinction: For purposes of determining
venue of the action (Riano) If action is founded on privity of contract between parties,
1. Real actions shall be commenced and tried in the then the action is transitory
proper court which has jurisdiction over the area
wherein the real property involved, or a portion But if there is no privity of contract and the action is
thereof, is situated. [Rule 4, Sec.1] founded on privity of estate only, such as a covenant that
2. Personal actions may be commenced and tried runs with the land in the hands of remote grantees, then
where the plaintiff or any of the principal the action is local and must be brought in the place where
plaintiffs resides, or where the defendant or any the land lies
of the principal defendants resides, or in the case
of a non-resident defendant, where he may be
found, at the election of the plaintiff. [Rule 4, ACTIONS IN REM, IN PERSONAM, AND QUASI IN REM
Sec.2]
ACTION IN ACTION
ACTION IN REM
NOTE: Not every action involving a real property is a PERSONAM QUASI IN REM
real action because the realty may only be incidental Directed
to the subject matter of the suit. To be a real action, it Directed against Directed against against
is not enough that the action must deal with real the thing itself particular persons particular
property. It is important that the matter in litigation persons
must also involve any of the following issues: title to, Jurisdiction
ownership, possession, paritition, foreclosure or over the
mortgage or any interest in real property. (Riano) person of
Jurisdiction over Jurisdiction over
defendant is
Personal the person of the the person of
Real action Mixed action not required
action defendant not defendant
as long as
required required
Personal jurisdiction
property is over the res is
sought to be required
Ownership or recovered or Both real and Proceeding to
possession of real damages for personal subject the
property is breach of properties are interest of a
involved Contract or the involved Proceeding to named
enforcement of a Action to impose a
determine the defendant
contract are responsibility or
state or over a
sought liability upon a
condition of a particular
person directly
Founded on Founded on thing property to an
Founded on both
privity of real privity of obligation or
estate contract lien burdening
Filed in the court Filed in the court it
where the where the The rules on Judgment is
Judgment
property (or any plaintiff or any of venue of real Judgment is binging only upon
binging upon
portion thereof) the defendants actions govern binding on the impleaded parties
particular
is situated resides, at the whole world or their successors
persons
plaintiff’s option in interest
E.g. Action for
E.g. Probate E.g. Specific
partition;
proceeding, performance,
LOCAL AND TRANSITORY ACTIONS foreclosure of
cadastral action for breach
real estate
proceeding of contract
Local action Transitory action mortgage
One that could be instituted One that could be
in one specific place prosecuted in any one of The question of whether the trial court has jurisdiction
[Manila Railroad v. several places [Manila depends on the nature of the action, i.e., whether the
Attorney-General (1911)] Railroad v. Attorney- action is in personam, in rem, or quasi in rem. [Riano citing
General (1911)] Biaco v. Philippine Countryside Rural Bank (2007)]
Venue depends upon the Its venue depends upon the
location of the property residence of the plaintiff or The distinction is important to determine whether or not
involved in the litigation the defendant at the option jurisdiction over the person of the defendant is required
(Riano) of the plaintiff (Riano) and consequently to determine the type of summons to be
employed. [Riano citing Gomez v. Court of Appeals (2004)]
14
INDEPENDENT CIVIL ACTIONS
15
CAUSE OF ACTION
CAUSE OF ACTION: A cause of action is the act or A failure to state a cause of action is not the same as an
omission by which a party violates a right of another. absence or a lack of cause of action. The former refers to
[Rule 2, Sec.2] an insufficiency in the allegations of the complaint while
the latter refers to the failure to prove or to establish by
Every ordinary civil action must be based on a cause of evidence one’s stated cause of action. [Riano]
action [Rule 2, Sec. 1]
A cause of action stems from the sources of obligations TEST OF THE SUFFICIENCY OF A CAUSE OF ACTION
under Art. 1156, CC - Law, Contract, Quasi-contract, Acts
and omissions punishable by law and Quasi-delict. Whether or not admitting the facts alleged, the court
[Sagrada Orden etc v. National Coconut Corporation could render a valid verdict in accordance with the prayer
(1952)] of the complaint [Santos v. de Leo (2005)]
There is a failure to state a cause of action if the pleading Ratio: A party may not institute more than one suit for a
asserting the claim states no cause of action. This is a single cause of action. [Rule 2, Sec. 3]
ground for a motion to dismiss. [Rule 16, Sec.1(g)] 1. To prevent repeated litigation between the same
parties in regard to the same subject or
It is submitted that the failure to state a cause of action controversy;
does not mean that the plaintiff has “no cause of action.” It 2. To protect the defendant from unnecessary
only means that the plaintiff’s allegations are insufficient vexation. Nemo debet vexare pro una et eadem
for the court to know that the rights of the plaintiff were causa (No man shall be twice vexed for one and
violated by the defendant. [Riano] the same cause);
3. To avoid the costs and expenses incident to
There is a failure to state a cause of action if allegations in numerous suits. [City of Bacolod v. SM Brewery
the complaint taken together, do not completely spell out (1969)]
the elements of a particular cause of action. [Riano]
16
therein notwithstanding the misjoinder of the same. This
is because if the court has no jurisdiction to try the
JOINDER OF CAUSES OF ACTION misjoined action, then the same must be severed and if
not so severed, any adjudication rendered by the court
It is the assertion of as many causes of action as a party with respect to the same would be a nullity. [Ada v. Baylon
may have against another in one pleading alone. It is also (2012)]
the process of uniting 2 or more demands or rights of
action in one action. [Riano citing Rule 2, Sec. 5 and CJS] There is no sanction against non-joinder of separate
causes of action since a plaintiff needs only a single cause
By a joinder of actions, or more properly, a joinder of of action to maintain an action (Regalado).
causes of action is meant the uniting of two or more
demands or rights of action in one action, the statement of In case of misjoinder of causes of action, the cause of
more than one cause of action in a declaration [Ada v. action erroneously joined need only be separated and
Baylon (2012)] dismissed, without affecting the action with regard to
other causes of action (Regalado).
SPLITTING OF CAUSES JOINDER OF CAUSES
There is a single cause of Contemplates several
action causes of action
Prohibited Encouraged
It minimizes multiplicity
It causes multiplicity of
of suits and
suits and double vexation
inconvenience on the
on part of defendant
parties
17
PARTIES TO CIVIL ACTIONS
PARTIES TO A CIVIL ACTION
REQUIREMENTS FOR A PERSON TO BE A PARTY TO A
CIVIL ACTION: Plaintiff – one having an interest in the matter of the
action or in obtaining the relief demanded. The term may
For a Person to be a Party to a Civil Action: either refer to the claiming party, counter-claimant, cross-
1. He must be a natural or juridical person or an claimant, or third-party plaintiff
entity authorized by law
2. He must have legal capacity to sue; and Defendant – one claiming an interest in the controversy
3. He must be the real party-in-interest or the subject thereof adverse to the plaintiff. Term may
also include:
A party must be a natural or juridical person or an entity 1. An unwilling co-plaintiff or one who should be
authorized by law joined as plaintiff but refuses to give his consent
- Only natural and juridical persons may be parties thereto (Sec. 10, Rule 3)
- See Art. 44, NC 2. The original plaintiff becoming a defendant to the
- Entities authorized by law may also be parties, original counterclaim of defendant; and
e.g.: 3. One necessary to a complete determination or
a. Partnership has a juridical personality settlement of the questions involved therein
separate and distinct from that of each of the
partners, even in case of failure to comply
with the requirements in Art 1772 NCC (Art. REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST
1768 NCC)
b. Labor organizations organized in accordance Who is a real party-in-interest: (Rule 3, Sec. 2)
with law may file a complaint or petition in 1. The party who stands to be benefited/injured by
court in representation of its members (Art the judgment in the suit;
242 LC) 2. The party entitled to the avails of the suit.
c. As to properties of the Roman Catholic
Church, the Archbishop or diocese to which Rules:
they belong may be a party (Ponce v. Roman 1. Every action must be prosecuted or defended in
Catholic) the name of the real party in interest. [Rule 3,
Sec.2]
Legal Capacity to Sue 2. The party’s interest must be direct, substantial
and material [Sumalo v. Litton (2006)].
Legal capacity to sue or be sued means that the party is 3. Husband and wife shall sue and be sued jointly,
free from general disability (e.g. minority or insanity) or, except as provided by law [Rule 3, Sec. 4]
in case of juridical entities, that it must be duly registered 4. A minor or a person alleged to be incompetent
in accordance with law may sue or be sued, with the assistance of his
father, mother, guardian, or if he has none, a
Under Sec. 4, Rule 8, legal capacity to sue must be averred guardian ad litem. [Rule 3, Sec. 5]
5. Minors (represented by their parents) are real
Lack of legal personality to parties in interest under the principle of
Lack of legal capacity to sue intergenerational responsibility. [Oposa v.
sue
The plaintiff’s general Factoran (1993)]
disability to sue, such as on 6. If a party becomes incompetent/ incapacitated
account of minority, The plaintiff is not the real during the pendency of the action, the action
insanity, incompetence, party in interest survives and may be continued by/against the
lack of juridical personality incompetent/ incapacitated assisted by his legal
or any other general guardian or guardian ad litem [Rule 3, Sec. 18]
disqualifications
It can be used as ground for Failure to Name Real Party in Interest
It can be a ground for a a MTD based on the failure a. Effect: a motion to dismiss may be filed on the
MTD [Rule 16 (1) (d)] of complaint to state a ground that the complaint states no cause of
cause of action. [Rule 16 action
(1) (g)] (a) If a complaint is filed for and in behalf of a
plaintiff who is not authorized to do so, the
Real- Party in Interest complaint is not deemed filed
b. Remedies:
Interest within the meaning of the Rules of Court means (1) Amendment of pleadings (Alonso v. Villamor,
material interest or an interest in issue to be affected by 1910); or
the decree or judgment of the case, as distinguished from (2) Complaint may be deemed amended to
mere curiosity about the question involved. [Ang v. Sps. include the real party-in-interest (Balquidra
Ang (2012)] v. CFI Capiz, 1977)
c. Exception: A real litigant may be held bound as a
party even if not formally impleaded provided he
18
had his day in court (Albert v. University joined. therein will not resolve the
Publishing Co., 1958) entire controversy if a
necessary party is not joined
INDISPENSABLE PARTIES They are those with such They are those whose
an interest in the presence is necessary to
Who: An indispensable party is a real party-in-interest controversy that a final adjudicate the whole
without whom no final determination can be had of an decree would necessarily controversy but whose
action. [Rule 3, Sec.7] affect their rights so that interests are so far
the court cannot proceed separable that a final decree
A party who has such an interest in the controversy or without their presence. can be made in their
subject matter that a final adjudication cannot be made, in absence without affecting
his absence, without injuring or affecting that interest. them.
[Riano]
Whenever in any pleading in which a claim is asserted a
The joinder of a party becomes compulsory when the one necessary party is not joined, the pleader is under
involved is an indispensable party. [Riano citing Rule 3, obligation to:
Sec.7] 1. Set forth the name of the necessary party, if
known, and
A person is NOT an indispensable party if his interest in 2. State the reason why the necessary party is
the controversy or subject matter is separable from the omitted. [Riano citing Rule 3, Sec. 9 par 1]
interest of the other parties, so that it will not necessarily
be directly or injuriously affected by a decree which does The non-inclusion of a necessary party does not prevent
not complrete justice between them. [Riano] the court from proceeding in the action, and the judgment
rendered therein shall be without prejudice to the rights
of such necessary party [Rule 3, Sec. 9 par 3]
REPRESENTATIVE AS PARTIES
Who: One who is not indispensable but ought to be joined Adverse party may contest: Authority may be contested
as a party if complete relief is to be accorded as to those by the adverse party at any time before judgment is
already parties, or for a complete determination or rendered
settlement of the claim subject of the action (Rule 3, Sec. - If the court determines after hearing that the
8) party declared indigent has sufficient income or
property, the proper docket and other lawful fees
Indispensable parties v. Necessary parties shall be assessed and collected by the clerk of
court
Indispensable parties [Rule Necessary parties [Rule 3,
3, Sec. 7] Sec. 8]
Must be joined under any Should be joined whenever ALTERNATIVE DEFENDANTS
and all conditions, his possible; the action can
presence being a sine qua proceed even in their Where the plaintiff is uncertain against whom of several
non for the exercise of absence because their persons he is entitled to relief, he may join any or all of
judicial power interest is separable from them in the alternative, although a right to relief against
that of the indispensable one may be inconsistent with a right to relief against the
party other. (Rule 3, Sec. 13)
No valid judgment if The case may be determined
indispensable party is not in court but the judgment
COMPULSORY AND PERMISSIVE JOINDER OF PARTIES
19
omission unmeritorious, it may order the
Compulsory Joinder of Indispensable Parties (Rule 3, Sec. inclusion of such omitted necessary party
7) - Parties in interest without whom no final 2. Parties may be dropped or added by order of the
determination can be had of an action shall be joined court on motion of any party or on its own
either as plaintiffs or defendants initiative at any stage of the action and on such
terms as are just. [Rule 3, Sec.11]
Joinder of INDISPENSABLE PARTIES are mandatory
Objections to defects in parties: Objections to defects in
Effect of Absence of Indispensable Parties: parties should be made at the earliest opportunity.
1. It is the duty of the court to stop the trial and to - The moment such defect becomes apparent, a
order the inclusion of such party (Cortez v. motion to strike the names of the parties must be
Avila). Such an order is unavoidable made.
2. Absence of an indispensable party renders all - Objections to misjoinder cannot be raised for the
subsequent actuations of the court null and void, first time on appeal [Lapanday Agricultural &
for want of authority to act, not only as to the Development Corporation v. Estita (2005)]
present parties but even as to those present
CLASS SUIT
Permissive Joinder (Rule 3, Sec. 6) - Parties can be joined,
as plaintiffs or defendants, in one single complaint or may Requisites: (Rule 3, Sec. 12)
themselves maintain or be sued in separate suits. 1. Subject matter of the controversy is one of
common/general interest to many persons;
Requisites of Permissive Joinder: 2. The persons are so numerous that it is
1. Right to relief arises out of the same transaction impracticable to join them all as parties (i.e.
or series of transactions impracticable to bring them all before the court);
a. Transaction - not only a stipulation or 3. Parties bringing the class suit are sufficiently
agreement but any event resulting in wrong, numerous and representative of the class and can
without regard to whether the wrong has fully protect the interests of all concerned;
been done by violence, neglect, or breach of 4. The representative sues/defends for the benefit
contract of all.
b. Series of transaction – transactions
connected with the same subject of the action Any party in interest shall have the right to intervene to
2. There is a question of law or fact common to all protect his individual interest. [Rule 3, Sec. 12]
the plaintiffs or defendants
3. Such joinder is not otherwise proscribed by the If a class suit is improperly brought, the action is subject
rules on jurisdiction and venue to dismissal regardless of the cause of action [Rule 16, Sec
1 (d)].
Distinguished from Joinder of Causes of Action
- In joinder of causes of action, it is enough if the A taxpayer's suit or a stockholder's derivative suit is in
cause of action arises out of the same contract the nature of a class suit, although subject to the other
- Unlike permissive joinder of parties, in joinder of requisites of the corresponding governing law especially
causes of action, there is no need for a common on the issue of locus standi. [Regalado]
question of fact or law
There is no class suit in an action filed by associations of
sugar planters to recover damages in behalf of individual
MISJOINDER AND NON-JOINDER OF PARTIES sugar planters for an allegedly libelous article in an
international magazine. There is no common or general
A party is misjoined when he is made a party to the action interest in reputation of a specific individual. Each of the
although he should not be impleaded. sugar planters has a separate and distinct reputation in
the community not shared by the others. [Riano citing
A party is not joined when he is supposed to be joined but Newsweek, Inc. v. Intermediate Appellate court (1986)]
is not impleaded in the action. (Riano)
A class suit does not require a commonality of interest in
Effect: the questions involved in the suit. What is required by the
1. Neither misjoinder nor non-joinder of parties is a Rules is a common or general interest in the subject
ground for dismissal of an action. [Rule 3, Sec. 11] matter of the litigation. [Riano citing Mathay v.
a. Non-joinder of an indispensable party is not Consolidated Bank &Trust Company (1974)]
a ground for outright dismissal. Reasonable
opportunity must be given for his inclusion Class Suit Permissive Joinder of Parties
by amendment of the complaint [Cortez v
Avila (1957)]. There is a single cause of There are multiple causes
b. In case of non-joinder of a necessary party, if action pertaining to of action separately
the court should find the reason for such numerous persons. belonging to several
persons.
20
c. E.g. actions to recover real and personal
property or to enforce liens thereon
Class Suit Derivative Suit
Substitution of Parties: For causes of action that survive
An action brought by the death of the party, there is substitution of parties
minority shareholders in
the name of the Counsel’s duty:
corporation to redress 1. Inform court within 30 days after such death of
wrongs committed against the fact thereof;
When the subject matter of it, for which the directors 2. Give the name and address of the legal
the controversy is one of refuse to sue. representatives.
common or general
interest to many persons, It is a remedy designed by NOTE: Failure to comply with this duty is a
and the parties are so equity and has been the ground for disciplinary action.
numerous that it is principal defense of the
impracticable to bring minority shareholders Court’s duty: in case of death, the court if the action
them all before the court, against abuses by the survives, shall order, upon proper notice, the legal
one or more may sue or majority. representative of the deceased to appear and to be
defend for the benefit of all. substituted for the deceased within a period of 30 days or
[Rule 3, Sec. 12] In a derivative action, the within such time as may be granted.
real party in interest is the - If there is notice of death, court should await
corporation itself, not the appointment of legal representative; otherwise,
shareholders who actually subsequent proceedings are void. Period of filing
instituted it [Lim v. Lim Yu of brief is suspended.
(2001))
Effect: Persons associated in an entity without juridical Death or separation of a party who is a public officer
personality may be sued under the name by which they [Rule 3, Sec. 17]
are generally/commonly known, but they cannot sue
under such name. [Rule 3, Sec. 15] Requisites:
1. Public officer is a party to an action in his official
The service of summons may be effected upon all the capacity;
defendants by serving upon any of them, or upon the 2. During the pendency of the action, he either
person in charge of the office or place of business dies/resigns or otherwise ceases to hold office;
maintained under such name. [Rule 14, Sec. 8] 3. It is satisfactorily shown to the court by any
party, within 30 days after the successor takes
office, that there is a substantial need to
EFFECT OF DEATH OF PARTY LITIGANT continue/maintain the action and
4. The successor adopts/continues (or threatens to
Survival or Death of Action do so) his predecessor’s action
5. The party or officer affected was given
The question as to whether an action survives or not reasonable notice of the application therefore
depends on the nature of the action and the damage sued and accorded an opportunity to be heard.
for
1. Causes of Action that SURVIVE the decedent
a. The wrong complained of affects primarily Action on Contractual Money Claims [Rule 3, Sec. 20]
and principally property and property rights
b. Injuries to the person are merely incidental Requisites:
c. E.g. Purely personal actions like support 1. The action must primarily be for recovery of
3. Causes of Action which DO NOT SURVIVE money/debt or interest thereon;
a. The injury complained of is to the person 2. The claim arose from express/implied contract;
b. Property and property rights affected are 3. Defendant dies before the entry of final judgment
incidental in the court in which the action was pending.
21
4. The defendant’s death will not result in the
dismissal of the action.
22
VENUE b. If they are the objects of 2 distinct
transactions, separate actions should be filed
Venue is the place, or the geographical area where an in each place unless properly joined.
action is to be filed and tried. In civil cases, it relates only
to the place of the suit and not to the jurisdiction of the VENUE OF PERSONAL ACTIONS
court. [Riano citing Manila Railroad Company v. Attorney
General (1911)] At the plaintiff’s election: [Rule 4, Sec. 2]
1. Where the plaintiff or any of the principal
Choosing the venue of an action is not left to a plaintiff’s plaintiffs resides;
caprice; the matter is regulated by the Rules of Court. 2. Where the defendant or any of the principal
[Ang v. Sps. Ang (2012)] defendants resides;
3. In case of a non-resident-defendant, where he
may be found.
VENUE VERSUS JURISDICTION
NOTE: The plaintiff or the defendant must be residents of
the place where the action has been instituted at the time
Venue Jurisdiction the action is commenced. [Ang v. Sps. Ang (2012)]
Place where the action is Power of the court to hear The residence of a person is his personal, actual or
instituted and decide a case physical habitation or his actual residence or place of
Jurisdiction over the abode, which may not necessarily be his legal residence
subject matter and over or domicile provided he resides therein with continuity
May be waived the nature of the action is and consistency. [Boleyley v. Villanueva]
conferred by law and
cannot-be waived A corporation cannot be allowed to file personal actions
Procedural Substantive in a place other than its principal place of business unless
May be changed by the Is fixed by law and cannot such place is aso the residence of a co-plaintiff or
written agreement of the be the subject of the defendant. [Clavecilla Radio v. Antillon]
parties agreement of the parties
Establishes a relation
Establishes a relation VENUE OF ACTIONS AGAINST NON-RESIDENTS (Rule 5,
between plaintiff and
between the court and the Sec. 3)
defendant, or petitioner and
subject matter
respondent
Non-resident FOUND in the Philippines:
Not a ground for a motu
Lack of jurisdiction over 1. For personal actions – Where the plaintiff resides
propio dismissal (except in
the subject matter is a 2. For real actions – Where the property is located
cases of summary
ground for a motu proprio
procedure; Rule 4, Rule on
dismissal. NOTE: The alternative venues granted to
Summary Procedure)
plaintiffs in Sec. 2, Rule 4 is not available to a
non-resident
VENUE OF REAL ACTIONS
Non-resident NOT FOUND in the Philippines: An action
may be filed ONLY when the case involves:
1. Shall be commenced and tried in the proper court
1. Personal status of plaintiff – File at the place
which has jurisdiction over the area wherein the
where plaintiff resides
real property involved, or a portion thereof is
2. Any property of said defendant located in the
situated. [Rule 4, Sec. 1(1)]
Philippines – File at the place where the property
(or any portion thereof) is situated/found
2. Forcible entry and detainer actions shall be
commenced and tried in the municipal court of
NOTE: When there is more than one defendant or
the municipality or city wherein the real property
plaintiff, the residences of the PRINCIPAL parties should
involved, or a portion thereof, is situated. [Rule 4,
be the basis for determining proper venue (Herrera)
Sec. 1(2)]
24
PLEADINGS
DEFINITION Ultimate Facts - Essential facts constituting the plaintiff’s
cause of action. A fact is essential if it cannot be stricken
Pleadings are the written statements of the respective out without leaving the statement of the cause of action
claims and defenses of the parties, submitted to the court insufficient. [Remitere v. Montinola (1966)]
for appropriate judgment [Rule 6, Sec. 1]
Non-Ultimate Facts:
Pleading v. Motion 1. Evidentiary or immaterial facts;
2. Legal conclusions, conclusions or inferences of
PLEADING MOTION facts from facts not stated, or incorrect inferences
Purpose: to submit a claim Purpose: to apply for an or conclusions from facts stated;
or defense for appropriate order not included in the 3. Conclusions of law alleged in the complaint are
judgment judgment not binding on the court.
Cannot be initiatory as 4. The details of probative matter or particulars of
May be initiatory they are always made in a evidence, statements of law, inferences and
case already filed in court arguments.
Always filed before May be filed even after
judgment judgment Test of Sufficiency of the Facts alleged in the Complaint:
Any application for relief WON upon the averment of facts, a valid judgment may be
Only 9 kinds of pleading properly rendered [Pamintan v. Costales (1914)].
not by a pleading is a
are allowed by the rules
motion
May be oral when made in
ANSWER (Rule 6, Sec. 4)
Must be written open court or in the course
of a hearing or trial
Definition - The pleading where the defendant sets forth
his affirmative/negative defenses. It may also be the
response to a counterclaim or a cross-claim.
KINDS OF PLEADINGS
Two kinds of Defenses that may be set forth in the Answer
Kinds of Pleadings Allowed (Rule 6, Sec. 2)
(Rule 6, Sec. 5) –
1. Complaint
2. Answer
1. Negative Defenses - Specific denials of the
3. Counterclaim
material facts alleged in the pleading of the
4. Cross-claim
claimant essential to his cause of action.
5. 3rd-party Complaint
A denial is not specific just because it is so
6. Complaint-in-intervention
qualified (Agton v. CA)
7. Reply
A general denial will be deemed an
admission of the averments in the complaint;
COMPLAINT(Rule 6, Sec. 3) it has to be specific
Modes of Denial (Sec. 10, Rule 8)
Definition - The pleading alleging the plaintiff’s cause/s of a. Defendant must specify each material
action. It should contain a concise statement of the allegation of fact the truth of which he
ultimate facts constituting the plaintiff’s cause/s of action, does not admit
not evidentiary facts or legal conclusions. b. If pleader decides to deny only a part or
a qualification of an averment, he shall
Contents – Statement of ultimate facts on which the specify so much of it as true and deny the
plaintiff relies for his claim: remainder
1. It must be in a methodical and logical form c. If pleader is without knowledge or
2. Plain, concise, and direct information sufficient to form a belief as
3. Statement of mere evidentiary facts are omitted to the truth of a material averment, he
(Rule 8, Sec. 1) shall so state
Need not be within the Must be within the Definition - INTERVENTION is a remedy by which a third
jurisdiction of the court jurisdiction of the court party, not originally impleaded in a proceeding, becomes
trying the main case trying the main case a litigant therein to enable him to protect or preserve a
right or interest which may be affected by such
Diminishes/defeats the Need not diminish/defeat
recovery sought by the the recovery sought by the proceeding.
opposing party opposing party
Its purpose is "to settle in one action and by a single
Cannot exceed the amount May exceed in amount or
judgment the whole controversy (among) the persons
stated in the original be different in kind from
involved." [First Philippine Holdings v. Sandiganbayan
complaint that sought in the original
(1996); Rule 19]
complaint
When Allowed - Intervention shall be allowed when a
Basis of Third-Party Complaint - Under this Rule, a person
person has:
not party to an action may be impleaded by the defendant
1. A legal interest in the matter in litigation;
either:
2. Or in the success of any of the parties;
1. On allegation of liability to the latter
3. Or an interest against the parties; and
2. On the ground of direct liability to the plaintiff; or
4. When he is so situated as to be adversely affected
3. Both (1) and (2)
by a distribution or disposition of property in the
custody of the court or of an officer thereof. [First
Situation in (1) is covered by the phrase
Philippine Holdings v. Sandiganbayan (1996)]
“contribution, indemnity or subrogation”, while
(2) and (3) are subsumed under the catch-all
Not an Independent Action - Intervention is not an
phrase (Samala v. Victor, 1989)
independent action, but is ancillary and supplemental to
an existing litigation. [First Philippine Holdings v.
Sandiganbayan (1996)]
Tests to Determine Whether the 3rd-Party Complaint is in
1. It is neither compulsory nor mandatory but only
Respect of Plaintiff’s Claim (Capayas v. CFI, 1946)
optional and permissive. [Mabayo v. CA (2002)]
1. WON it arises out of the same transaction on
2. The Court has full discretion in permitting or
which the plaintiff's claim is based, or although
disallowing intervention, which must be
arising out of another/different transaction, is
exercised judiciously and only after
connected with the plaintiff’s claim;
consideration of all the circumstances obtaining
2. WON the 3rd-party defendant would be liable to
in the case. [Mago v. CA (1999)]
the plaintiff or to the defendant for all/part of the
3. It is not an absolute right as it can be secured
plaintiff’s claim against the original defendant;
only in accordance with the terms of applicable
3. WON the 3rd-party defendant may assert any
statute or rule. [Office of Ombudsman v.
defenses which the 3rd-party plaintiff has or may
Samaniego (2010)]
have to the plaintiff’s claim.
Meaning of Legal Interest - Interest must be of a direct and
Additional Rules
immediate character so that the intervenor will either
1. Leave of court to file a 3rd-party complaint may
gain or lose by the direct legal operation of the judgment.
be obtained by motion under Rule 15.
The interest must be actual and material, a concern which
2. Summons on 3rd (4th/etc.) – party defendant
is more than mere curiosity, or academic or sentimental
must be served for the court to obtain
desire; it must not be indirect and contingent, indirect
jurisdiction over his person, since he is not an
and remote, conjectural, consequential or collateral.
original party.
[Virra Mall Tenants v. Virra Mall (2011)]
28
2. Exception – When a Reply is necessary
Requisites for Valid Intervention a. To set up affirmative defenses on the
1. There must be a motion for intervention filed counterclaim (Rosario v. Martinez)
before rendition of judgment by the trial court. b. Where the answer alleges the defense of
2. Movant must show in his motion that he has a: usury in which case a reply under oath
a. Legal interest in (1) the matter of litigation, should be made; otherwise, the allegation of
(2) the success of either of the parties in the usurious interest shall be deemed admitted
action or (3) against both parties. [Rule 8, Sec. 8; Sun Bros. v. Caluntad]
b. That the movant is so situated as to be c. Where the defense in the answer is based on
adversely affected by a distribution or other an actionable document, a reply under oath
disposition of property in the custody of the must be made; otherwise, the genuineness
court or an officer thereof and due execution of the document shall be
c. That the intervention must not unduly delay deemed admitted. [Rule 8, Sec. 11; Toribio v.
or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of Bidin]
the original parties and that the intervenor’s
rights may not be fully protected in a
separate proceeding.
PLEADINGS ALLOWED IN SMALL CLAIM CASES AND
How to Intervene CASES COVERED BY THE RULES OF SUMMARY
1. With leave of court, the court shall consider the 2 PROCEDURE
factors
2. Motion to intervene may be filed at any time Under the Revised Rules on Summary Procedure – The
before rendition of judgment by trial court only pleadings allowed to be filed are: (Sec. 3)
3. Copy of the pleadings-in-intervention shall be 1. Complaints
attached to the motion and served on the original 2. Compulsory counterclaims and cross-claims
parties pleaded in the Answer; and
3. Answers thereto
Time to Intervene: (Rule 19, Sec. 2)
1. General Rule: The motion to intervene must be Prohibited Pleadings, Motions, or Petitions (Sec. 19)
filed at any time before the rendition of judgment 1. Motion to dismiss the complaint or to quash the
by the trial court complaint or information except on the ground of
2. Exceptions: lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, or
a. With respect to indispensable parties, failure to comply with required barangay
intervention may be allowed even on appeal conciliation proceedings;
(Falcasantos v. Falcasantos) 2. Motion for a bill of particulars;
b. When the intervenor is the Republic (Lim v. 3. Motion for new trial, or for reconsideration of a
Pacquing) judgment, or for opening of trial;
c. Intervention may be allowed after judgment 4. Petition for relief from judgment;
where necessary to protect some interest 5. Motion for extension of time to file pleadings,
which cannot otherwise be protected, and for affidavits or any other paper;
the purpose of preserving the intervenor’s 6. Petition for certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition
right to appeal (Pinlac v. CA) against any interlocutory order issued by the
court;
Remedy for Denial of Motion for Intervention 7. Motion to declare the defendant in default;
1. The movant may file a motion for reconsideration 8. Dilatory motions for postponement;
since the denial of a motion for intervention is an 9. Reply;
interlocutory order. 10. Third party complaints; and
2. Alleging grave abuse of discretion, movant can 11. Interventions.
also file a certiorari case.
Forms Used Under the Rule of Procedure under Small
Claims Cases
REPLY 1. Instead of filing complaint, a Statement of Claim
using Form 1-SCC shall be filed [Sec. 5]
Definition - The plaintiff’s response to the defendant's 2. Answer shall be filed by way of a Response using
answer. The function of which is to deny or allege facts in Form 3-SCC [Sec. 10]
denial or in avoidance of new matters alleged by way of 3. Defendant may file counterclaim if he possesses a
defense in the answer and thereby join or make issue as claim against the plaintiff that
to such new matters. (Rule 6, Sec. 10) a. Is within the coverage of this Rule, exclusive
of interest and costs;
Effect of Failure to Reply b. Arises out of the same transaction or event
1. General Rule - Filing a reply is merely optional. that is the subject matter of the plaintiff’s
New facts that were alleged in the answer are claim;
deemed controverted should a party fail to reply c. Does not require for its adjudication the
thereto. joinder of third parties; and
29
d. Is not the subject of another pending action, 2. That to the best of his knowledge, information,
the claim shall be filed as a counterclaim in and belief there is good ground to support it; and
the Response; otherwise, the defendant shall 3. That it is not interposed for delay
be barred from suit on the counterclaim.
Unsigned Pleadings
The defendant may also elect to file a counterclaim 1. No legal effect
against the plaintiff that does not arise out of the same 2. Court may, in its discretion, allow such remedy to
transaction or occurrence, provided that the amount and be remedied if it appears that:
nature thereof are within the coverage of this Rule and a. It was due to mere inadvertence; and
the prescribed docket and other legal fees are paid. b. It was not intended for delay
Test to Determine WON there is forum shopping: WON in MANNER OF MAKING ALLEGATIONS
the 2 or more cases pending, there is identity of:
1. Parties In General – (Rule 8, Sec. 1)
2. Rights or causes of action 1. Every pleading shall contain a statement of the
3. Relief sought ultimate facts on which the party pleading relies
for his claim or defense
Certificate of Non-Forum Shopping (CNFS) (Rule 7, Sec. 5) a. In a methodical and logical form
1. The CNFS is to be executed by the petitioner, not b. A plain, concise and direct statement
by the counsel. c. Statement of mere evidentiary facts omitted
2. CNFS is required only for complaints or initiatory
pleadings (e.g. permissive counterclaim, cross- 2. If a defense relief is based on law, state in a clear
claim etc.). and concise manner:
3. CNFS is not required in a compulsory a. Pertinent provisions of the law
counterclaim. A counterclaim is not an initiatory b. Applicability of the law to him
pleading. [UST Hospital v. Surla (1998)]
a. However, a certification is needed in Facts that must be averred PARTICULARLY -
permissive counterclaims (Korea Exchange Circumstances showing fraud/mistake in all averments of
Bank v. Gonzales) fraud/mistake [Rule 8, Sec. 5]
4. The lack of certification against forum shopping
is not curable by mere amendment of a Facts that may be averred GENERALLY:
complaint, but shall be a cause for the dismissal 1. Conditions precedent; but there must still be an
of the case without prejudice. The general rule is allegation that the specific condition precedent
that subsequent compliance with the has been complied with, otherwise it will be
requirements will not excuse a party's failure to dismissed for lack of cause of action; [Rule 8, Sec.
comply in the first instance. [Ramirez v. Mar 3]
Fishing (2012)] 2. Capacity to sue or be sued;
3. Capacity to sue or be sued in a representative
Who Executes the Certification - Certification against capacity; [Rule 8, Sec. 4]
forum shopping ordained by the Rules is to be executed 4. Legal existence of an organization; A party
by the petitioner, not his counsel. The petitioner is in the desiring to raise an issue as to the legal existence
best position to know whether he filed or caused the filing or capacity of any party to sue or be sued in a
of a petition in the case. representative capacity shall do so by specific
denial which shall include supporting particulars
Certification by counsel is defective certification. In Santos within the pleader's knowledge. [Rule 8, Sec 4]
v. CA, the Court held that a special power of attorney was 5. Malice/intent/knowledge or other condition of
insufficient. the mind; [Rule 8, Sec. 5]
6. Judgments of domestic/foreign courts, tribunals,
Effect of Submission of False CNFS or Non-Submission: boards or officers (without need to show
1. Indirect contempt jurisdiction); [Rule 8, Sec. 6]
2. Administrative and criminal actions 7. Official documents/acts. [Rule 8, Sec. 9]
NOTE: the CNFS is mandatory but NOT A general averment of the performance or occurrence of
jurisdictional. all conditions precedent shall be sufficient [Rule 8, Sec. 3]
Requirement of a Corporation executing the verification/ All valid conditions precedent to the institution of a
CNFS - Only individuals vested with authority by a valid particular action, whether prescribed by statute, fixed by
board resolution may sign the certificate of non-forum agreement of the parties, or implied by law must be
31
performed or complied with before commencing the
action. Such fact must be pleaded. NOTE: The genuineness and due execution of the
document must be denied SPECIFICALLY
Failure to comply with a condition precedent is a ground - Due Execution - That the party whose signature it
for a motion to dismiss (Rule 16, Sec. 1(j)) bears admits that he voluntarily signed it; or that
it was signed by another for him with his
Examples of Conditions Precedent: authority
1. Exhaustion of administrative remedies - Genuineness - That the party whose signature it
2. Investigation by a fiscal is a prerequisite to bears admits that at the time it was signed it was
annulment of marriage when defendant defaults in words and figures exactly as set out; and that
(Tolentino v. Villanueva) the formalities, such as swearing and
3. No suit shall be filed or maintained between acknowledgement, or revenue stamps which are
members of the same family unless it should required by law are waived by him
appear that earnest efforts at compromise have
been made but that the same have failed. (Art. Failure to Deny Under Oath the Actionable Document:
222; Versoza v. Versoza) 1. The genuineness and due execution is deemed
4. Arbitration; Barangay Conciliation admitted
2. The document need not be formally offered in
Capacity – What must be averred: evidence
1. Facts showing the capacity of a party to sue or be
sued; or
2. The authority to sue or be sued in a SPECIFIC DENIALS (Rule 8, Sec. 10)
representative capacity;
3. Or the legal existence of an organized association The purpose of requiring the defendant to make a specific
of persons that is made a party (Rule 8, Sec. 4) denial is to make him disclose the matters alleged in the
complaint which he sincerely intends to disprove at the
Fraud, Mistake, Malice, Intent, Knowledge and Other trial, together with matters which he relies upon to
Condition of the Mind, Judgments, official documents, or support the denial (Herrera).
acts - Circumstances constituting fraud or mistake must
be stated with particularity while malice, intent, Modes of Denial:
knowledge or other condition of the mind of a person may
be averred generally [Rule 8, Sec. 5] 1. Specific Absolute Denial - Defendant must specify
each material allegation of fact the truth of which
Judgment - In pleading a judgment or decision of a he does not admit
domestic or foreign court, judicial or quasi-judicial a. Whenever applicable, he shall set forth the
tribunal, or of a board or officer, it is sufficient to aver the substance of the matters which he will rely
judgment or decision without setting forth matter upon to support the denial
showing jurisdiction to render it. (Rule 8, Sec. 6)
2. Partial Specific Denial - If pleader decides to deny
only a part or a qualification of an averment:
PLEADING AN ACTIONABLE DOCUMENT (Rule 8, Sec. 7) a. He shall specify so much of it as is true and
material
Actionable Document - The written instrument upon b. He shall deny the remainder
which the action or defense is based. Where a pleader
relies upon a document, its substance must be set out in 3. Disavowal of Knowledge - If defendant is without
the pleading either by its terms or by its legal effects knowledge or information sufficient to form a
belief as to the truth of a material averment made
Pleading the actionable document: in the complaint:
1. The substance of such instrument or document a. He shall so state
shall be set forth in the pleading; and b. This shall have the effect of a denial
2. The original or copy thereof shall be attached to
the pleading as an exhibit, which shall be deemed Effect of Failure to make Specific Denials:
to be part of the pleading; or 1. General Rule: Allegations not specifically denied
3. Said copy may with like effect be set forth in the are deemed admitted (Rule 8, Sec. 11)
pleading
2. Exceptions: Averments not deemed admitted
A variance in the substance of the document set forth in even if not specifically denied
the pleading and the document annexed thereto does not a. Allegations as to the amount of unliquidated
warrant dismissal of the action (Convets Inc. v. National damages;
Dev. Co.) b. Allegations immaterial to the cause of action
c. Allegations of merely evidentiary or
How to Contest an Actionable Document (Rule 8, Sec. 8) immaterial facts may be expunged from the
1. By specific denial under oath; and pleading or may be stricken out on motion.
2. By setting forth what is claimed to be the facts [Rule 8, Sec. 12]
32
d. Conclusion of law.
Issued by the court on
When a specific denial requires an OATH – When the Rendered by the court
plaintiff’s motion, for
genuineness and due execution of an actionable following a default order or
failure of the defendant to
document is contested or denied, the specific denial must after it received ex parte
file his responsive pleading
be under oath. (Rule 8, Sec. 8) plaintiff’s evidence
seasonably
Interlocutory -Not
Final – Appealable
appealable
34
DEFAULT IN ORDINARY PROCEDURE
If motion granted:
Court issues order of default
and renders judgment or
require plaintiff to submit
evidence ex parte
35
FILING AND SERVICE OF PLEADINGS Service - The act of providing a party or his counsel with a
copy of the pleading or paper concerned. [Rule 13, Sec. 2]
PAYMENT OF DOCKET FEES
Papers required to be filed and served: (Rule 13, Sec. 4)
As a rule, the court acquires jurisdiction over the case 1. Pleading subsequent to the complaint;
only upon payment of prescribed fees 2. Appearance;
3. Written Motion;
General rule: Without payment, case is considered not 4. Notice;
filed. Payment of docket fees is mandatory and 5. Order;
jurisdictional. 6. Judgment;
7. Demand;
It is not simply the filing of the complaint or appropriate 8. Offer of Judgment;
initiatory pleading but the payment of the prescribed 9. Resolution;
docket fee, that vests a trial court with jurisdiction over 10. Similar papers.
the subject matter or nature of the action [Proton Pilipinas
v. Banque National de Paris (2005)]
PERIODS OF FILING OF PLEADINGS
Effect of Failure to Pay Docket Fees at Filing
PERIOD
PLEADING PERIOD
1. The Manchester Rule: Manchester v. CA (1987) COUNTED FROM
a. Automatic Dismissal Service of
b. Any defect in the original pleading resulting summons, unless
in underpayment of the docket fees cannot a different period
be cured by amendment, such as by the Within 15 days
is fixed by the
reduction of the claim as, for all legal court (Rule 11,
purposes, there is no original complaint over Sec. 1
which the court has acquired jurisdiction Within 30 days if the
defendant is a foreign
2. Relaxation of the Manchester Rule by Sun Answer to Receipt of
private juridical
Insurance v. Asuncion (1989) the summons (Rule
entity and service of
a. NOT automatic dismissal Complaint 11, Sec. 2)
summons is made on
b. Court may allow payment of fees within government official
reasonable period of time. Note that payment At least 60 days
should always be within the prescriptive In case of non- Service of
period of the action filed. resident defendant extrajudicial
on whom summons (Sec.
3. Further modification by Heirs of Hinog v. Melicor extrajudicial service 15, Rule 14)
(2005) is made
a. Fees as lien Answer to
b. Where the trial court acquires jurisdiction Within 15 days Service of a copy
AMENDED
over a claim by the filing of the pleading and (if amendment was a of the amended
Complaint
the payment of the prescribed filing fee, BUT matter of right) complaint
(amended
SUBSEQUENTLY, the judgment awards a counterclaim,
claim not specified in the pleading, or cannot cross-claim, Notice of the
then be estimated, or a claim left for 3rd party Within 10 days
order admitting
determination by the court, then the (if amendment was
complaint, the same (Rule
additional filing fee shall constitute a lien on complaint in not a matter of right)
11, Sec. 3)
the judgment intervention)
Answer to
4. Exception to the Sun Insurance doctrine: Gochan Counterclaim From service
v. Gochan Within 10 days
or Cross- (Rule 11, Sec. 4)
a. The Sun Insurance rule allowing payment of Claim
deficiency does not apply where plaintiff Answer to Same rule as
never demonstrated any willingness to abide third (4th, Within 15 days answer to the
by the rules to pay the docket fee but etc)- party complaint (Rule
stubbornly insisted that the case filed was complaint 11, Sec. 5)
one for specific performance and damages. From service of
the pleading
Reply Within 10 days
responded to
FILING VERSUS SERVICE OF PLEADINGS (Rule 11, Sec. 6)
Answer to From notice of
Filing - The act of presenting the pleading or other paper supplemental Within 10 days the order
to the clerk of court. [Rule 13, Sec. 2] complaint admitting the
36
same, unless a a. Date of filing is determinable from 2 sources:
different period (1) From the post office stamp on the
is fixed by the envelope
court (2) From the registry receipt
NOTE: Upon motion and on such terms as may be just, the b. It is done by depositing in the post office:
court may extend the time to plead provided in these (1) In a sealed envelope
Rules. The court may also, upon like terms, allow an (2) Plainly addressed to the party or his
answer or other pleading to be filed after the time fixed counsel
by these Rules. [Rule 11, Sec. 11] (a) At his office if known
(b) Otherwise, at his residence if known
(3) Postage fully pre-paid
MANNER OF FILING (4) With instructions to the postmaster to
return the mail to the sender after 10
As per Rule 13, Sec. 3: days if undelivered
1. Personally
a. By By personally presenting the original to Substituted Service (Rule 13, Sec. 8)
the clerk of court. 1. Done by delivery of the copy to the clerk of court
b. The pleading is deemed filed upon the with proof of failure of both personal and service
receipt of the same by the clerk of court who by mail
shall endorse on it the date and hour of filing. 2. Proper only when:
c. If a party avails of a private carrier, the date a. Service cannot be made personally or by mail
of the court’s actual receipt of the pleading b. Office and place of residence of the party of
(not the date of delivery to the private his counsel being unknown
carrier) is deemed to be the date of the filing 3. Service is complete at the time of such delivery
of that pleading. [Benguet Electric
Cooperative v. NLRC (1992)]
SERVICE OF JUDGMENTS, FINAL ORDERS, OR
2. By Registered Mail RESOLUTIONS (Rule 13, Sec. 9)
a. Filing by mail should be through the registry
service (i.e. by depositing the pleading in the Service is done either:
post office). 1. Personally
b. The pleading is deemed filed on the date it 2. By registered mail
was deposited with the post office. 3. By publication ONLY IF:
a. Party is summoned by publication AND
Filing a pleading by facsimile is not sanctioned. But fax b. He failed to appear in the action
was allowed in an extradition case (Justice Cuevas v. Juan
Antonio Munoz) NOTE: There is NO substituted service of
judgments and final orders
MODES OF SERVICE
PRIORITIES IN MODES OF SERVICE AND FILING
Personal Service (Rule 13, Sec. 6)
1. Delivering personally a copy to the party, who is General rule: Personal filing and service is preferred.
not represented by a counsel, or to his counsel; or (Rule 13, Sec. 11)
2. Leaving a copy in counsel’s office with his clerk
or with a person having charge thereof; or Resort to other modes of filing and service must be
3. Leaving the copy between 8am and 6pm at the accompanied by an explanation why the service/filing
party’s or counsel’s residence, if known, with a was not done personally. If there is no written
person of sufficient age and discretion then explanation, the paper is considered not filed.
residing thereon – if not person is found in his
office, or if his office is unknown, or if he has no Exception: Papers emanating from the court.
office
Purpose of the rule on completeness of service for service by MODE PROOF OF SERVICE
registered mail: A written admission of the
party served, OR
To make sure that the party being served with the The official return of the
pleading, order or judgment is duly informed of the same server; OR
so that such party can take steps to protect the interests, Personal Service Affidavit of the party
i.e., enable to file an appeal or apply for other appropriate serving containing a full
reliefs before the decision becomes final. [MINTERBRO statement of the date,
v,CA (2012)] place, and manner of
service
Service to the lawyer binds the party. But service to the Affidavit of the person
party does not bind the lawyer, unless ordered by the mailing stating the facts
court in the following circumstances: Service by ordinary mail
showing compliance with
1. When it is doubtful who the attorney for such Rule 13, Sec. 7
party is; or Affidavit of person mailing
2. When the lawyer cannot be located; or containing facts showing
3. When the party is directed to do something compliance with Rule 13,
personally, as when he is ordered to show cause. Sec. 7, AND
[Retoni, Jr. v. CA]
Registry receipt issued by
mailing office; OR
Notice to the lawyer who appears to have been
The registry return card
unconscionably irresponsible cannot be considered as
which shall be filed
notice to his client, as it would then be easy for the lawyer Service by registered mail
immediately upon its
to prejudice the interests of his client by just alleging that
receipt by the sender, or in
he just forgot every process of the court affecting his
lieu thereof of the
clients, because he was so busy. [Bayog v. Natino]
unclaimed letter together
with the certified or sworn
copy of the notice given by
PROOF OF FILING
the postmaster to the
addressee.
1. Filing is proved by its existence in the record of
the case (Rule 13, Sec. 12)
AMENDMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADINGS
2. If it is not in the record:
HOW TO AMEND PLEADINGS (Rule 10, Sec. 1)
When pleading is deemed
Proof of filing 1. Adding an allegation of a party;
filed
2. Adding the name of a party;
Personally
38
3. Striking out an allegation of a party; Grounds for allowance of the amendment
4. Striking out the name of a party; 1. If it appears to the court that the motion was
5. Correcting a mistake in the name of a party; and made to delay the action, leave of court is not
6. Correcting a mistaken or inadequate allegation or given
description in any other respect 2. There must be some reasonable grounds
justifying its exercise of discretion to allow
A new copy of the entire pleading, incorporating amendment
the amendments, which shall be indicated by
appropriate marks, shall be filed. (Rule 10, Sec. 7) When amendment by leave of court may not be allowed
1. If the cause of action, defense or theory of the
Purpose: That the actual merits of the controversy may case is changed.
speedily be determined, without regard to technicalities, 2. If amendment is intended to confer jurisdiction
and in the most expeditious and inexpensive manner. to the court.
a. If the court has no jurisdiction in the subject
As a general policy, liberality in allowing amendments is matter of the case, the amendment of the
greatest in the early stages of a law suit, decreases as it complaint cannot be allowed so as to confer
progresses and changes at times to a strictness jurisdiction on the court over the property.
amounting to a prohibition. This is further restricted by [PNB v. Florendo (1992)]
the condition that the amendment should not prejudice 3. If amendment is for curing a premature or non-
the adverse party or place him at a disadvantage. (Barfel existing cause of action.
Development v. CA, 1993) 4. If amendment is for purposes of delay.
Types of Amendments:
1. Amendment as a matter of right FORMAL AMENDMENTS (Rule 10, Sec. 4)
2. Amendment as a matter of judicial discretion
When an amendment is formal:
1. When there is a mere defect in the designation of
AMENDMENTS AS A MATTER OF RIGHT (Rule 10, Sec. 2) the parties;
2. Other clearly clerical or typographical errors
When amendment is allowed as a matter of right:
1. Once as a matter of course How formal amendments are effected
a. A 2nd or subsequent amendment must now 1. It may be summarily corrected by the court at
be with leave of court, not a matter of right any stage of the action
anymore 2. A party may, by motion, call for the formal
2. Instances: amendment
a. Substantial amendment – before responsive
pleading is filed NOTE: The formal amendment must NOT cause prejudice
(1) Amendment of complaint before an to the adverse party
answer is filed.
(2) Amendment of answer before a reply is
filed or before the period for filing a AMENDMENTS TO CONFORM TO OR AUTHORIZE
reply expires PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE (Rule 10, Sec. 5)
(3) Amendment of reply any time within 10
days after it is served Applicability of Sec. 5 - This is an instance wherein the
b. Formal amendment court acquires jurisdiction over the issues even if the
same are not alleged in the original pleadings of the
parties where the trial of said issues is with the express or
AMENDMENTS BY LEAVE OF COURT (Rule 10, Sec. 3) implied consent of the parties
39
NOTE: Remember, however, that where the plaintiff has When an amended A supplemental pleading
no valid cause of action at the time of the filing of the pleading is filed, a new does not require the filing
complaint, this defect cannot be cured or remedied by the copy of the entire pleading of a new copy of the entire
acquisition or accrual of one while the action is pending must be filed pleading
SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADINGS
2. For Actions in Rem and Quasi In Rem Any mode of appearance in court by a defendant or his
a. Not to acquire jurisdiction over the lawyer is equivalent to service of summons, absent any
defendant but mainly to satisfy the indication that the appearance of counsel for petitioner is
constitutional requirement of due process precisely to protest the jurisdiction of the court over the
b. Jurisdiction over the defendant is not person of the defendant. [Delos Santos v. Montesa (1993)]
required and the court acquires jurisdiction
over an action as long as it acquires
jurisdiction over the res WHO MAY SERVE SUMMONS
Issuance of Summons - Upon the filing of the complaint Who May Serve Summons (Rule 14, Sec. 3)
and the payment of legal fees, the clerk of court shall issue 1. The sheriff
the corresponding summons to the defendants. [Rule 14, 2. His deputy
Sec. 1] 3. Other proper court officer
4. Any suitable person authorized by the court (for
Contents of Summons (Rule 14, Sec. 2) – justifiable reasons)
1. Summons shall be:
a. Directed to the defendant NOTE: The enumeration in Sec. 3 of the persons
b. Signed by clerk of court under seal who may validly serve summons is EXCLUSIVE
(Herrera)
2. Summons shall contain:
a. Name of the court and the names of the
parties to the action RETURN OF SUMMONS
b. A direction that the defendant answer within
the time fixed by the Rules Return When Service has been Completed (Rule 14, Sec. 4)
c. A notice that unless the defendant so 1. The server shall serve a copy of the return to the
answers, plaintiff will take judgment by plaintiff’s counsel
default and may be granted the relief applied a. Within 5 days therefrom
for b. Personally or by registered mail
2. The server shall return the summons
3. The following shall be attached to the original a. To the clerk who issue it
and each copy of the summons: b. Accompanied by proof of service
a. A copy of the complaint
b. Order for appointment of guardian ad litem It is required to be given to the plaintiff’s counsel in order
(if any) to enable him:
1. To move for a default order should the defendant
Effect of Invalid Summons fail to answer on time, or
1. The trial court does not acquire jurisdiction and 2. In case of non-service, so that alias summons may
renders null and void all subsequent proceedings be sought
and issuances (Syjuco v. Castro)
2. Any judgment without service of summons in the In either of the 2 cases, server must serve a copy
absence of a valid waiver is null and void of the return on plaintiff’s counsel within 5 days
(Filmerco Commercial Co. v. IAC) from completion or failure of service
Upon compliance with this requirement, it can NOTE: In other words, a resident defendant in an action
validly serve summons by publication in a personam, who cannot be personally served with
newspaper of general circulation. (United summons, may be summoned either by:
Coconut Planters Bank v. Ongpin) 1. Substituted service in accordance with Sec. 7,
Rule 14
NOTE: Under this Section, summons by publication can be 2. Or by service by publication under Sec. 16, Rule
made in ANY action (personam, in rem, quasi in rem) 14
unlike in cases of Non-Resident Defendants.
When the action is in rem or quasi in rem, extra-
territorial service may be effected provided that Sec. 16
The Rule on Non-Resident Defendants (Extra-territorial requirements are met.
Service); Rule 14, Sec. 15
PROOF OF SERVICE
44
MOTIONS
2. Hearing on the motion set by the applicant
MOTIONS IN GENERAL
Motion Day (Rule 15, Sec. 7) - Except for urgent
DEFINITION OF A MOTION motions, motions are scheduled for hearing:
a. On Friday afternoons;
A motion is an application for relief other than by a b. Afternoon of the next working day, if Friday
pleading. (1a) is a non-working day.
46
Upon the filing of the motion, the clerk must immediately details about matters right or interest in such
bring it to the attention of the court. which are alleged generally action, the opportunity to
or which are indefinite and appear and be joined
The court may: (Rule 12, Sec. 2) vague,
1. Deny so he could assert or
2. Grant the motion outright so as to properly guide protect such right or
3. Allow the parties the opportunity to be heard such party in answering interest
the pleading and to avoid
surprise in the trial of the
COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDER AND EFFECT OF case
NONCOMPLIANCE Available to any person not
yet a party to the action at
Compliance with Order (Rule 12, Sec. 3) – If motion is any time after the
granted wholly/partially: Available to the defendant
commencement of an
1. Within 10 days from notice of order, Bill of before he files his
action, even during the
Particulars or a more definite statement should responsive pleading
proceeding, but not after
be submitted (unless court fixes a different the trial has been
period). concluded
2. Bill of Particulars or definite statement filed
either as a separate pleading or as an amended Effect of Motion:
pleading, a copy of which must be served on the 1. If the motion is granted, in whole or in part,
adverse party. a. The movant can wait until the bill of
particulars is served on him by opposing
Effect of Non-Compliance (Rule 12, Sec. 4) – party
1. In case of non-compliance or insufficient b. Then he will have the balance of the
compliance with the order for Bill of Particulars, reglementary period within which to file his
the court: responsive pleading
a. May order the striking out of the pleading (or 2. If the motion is denied
portion thereof) to which the order is a. He will still have such balance of the
directed; OR reglementary period to file his responsive
b. Make such order as it may deem just. pleading, counted from service of the order
denying his motion
2. If a party fails to obey:
a. If the plaintiff fails to obey, his complaint IN ANY CASE: The party will have at least 5 days
may be dismissed with prejudice unless to file his responsive pleading
otherwise ordered by the court. [Rule 12,
Sec. 4; Rule 17, Sec. 3]
b. If defendant fails to obey, his answer will be
stricken off and his counterclaim dismissed,
and he will be declared in default upon
motion of the plaintiff. [Rule 9, Sec. 3; Rule
12, Sec. 4; Rule 17, Sec. 4]
Bill of Particulars
Intervention
Purpose is to enable a Purpose is to enable a
party bound to respond to person not yet a party to an
a pleading to get more action, yet having a certain
47
MOTION TO DISMISS 11. Non-compliance with a condition precedent for
filing claim
IN GENERAL
NOTE: Complaints cannot be dismissed on ground not
Definition – A remedy of the defendant, or the responding alleged in a motion to dismiss. The motion may be based
party in general, which attacks the entire pleading and on only one of the grounds enumerated in Sec. 1, Rule 16
seeks its dismissal based on:
1. Grounds which are patent on the face of the
complaint; Lack of Jurisdiction (LOJ) over the Defendant’s Person
2. Defenses available to the defendant at the time of
the filing of the complaint The objection of LOJ over the person on account of lack of
service or defective service of summons, must be raised:
It hypothetically admits the facts stated in the complaint. 1. At the very first opportunity;
2. Before any voluntary appearance is made.
It is not a responsive pleading. It is not a pleading at all. It
is subject to the omnibus motion rule since it is a motion In La Naval Drug Corp. v. CA, et al. the Court held that
that attacks a pleading. Hence, it must raise all objections while lack of jurisdiction over the person of defendant
available at the time of the filing thereof. may be duly and seasonably raised, his voluntary
appearance in court without qualification is a waiver of
Types of Dismissal of Action: such defense.
1. MTD before answer under Rule 16;
2. MTD under Rule 17: Appearance of counsel is equivalent to summons, unless
a. Upon notice by plaintiff; such is made to protest the jurisdiction of the court over
b. Upon motion by plaintiff; the person of the defendant. If grounds other than invalid
c. Due to fault of plaintiff. service of summons are raised, it cannot be considered as
3. Demurrer to evidence after plaintiff has a special appearance. [De los Santos v. Montesa (1993)]
completed the presentation of his evidence under
Rule 33; NOTE: Sec. 20, Rule 14 makes a categorical statement that
4. Dismissal of an appeal. the inclusion in a motion to dismiss of other grounds
aside from lack of jurisdiction over the person of the
Period to File: Within the time for, but before filing of, the defendant shall not be deemed voluntary appearance on
answer to the complaint or pleading asserting a claim his part.
Exceptions:
a. For special reasons which may be allowed
even after trial has begun, a motion to Lack of Jurisdiction over the Subject Matter of the Claim
dismiss may be filed
b. The court has allowed the filing of a motion If the complaint shows on its face LOJ, the court may
to dismiss where the evidence that would dismiss the case outright instead of hearing the motion.
constitute a ground for dismissal was
discovered during trial A MTD on the ground of LOJ over the subject matter may
be raised either:
General Rule: A court may NOT motu propio dismiss a 1. Before answer;
case, unless a motion to that effect is filed by a party. 2. After answer is filed;
3. After hearing had commenced;
Exceptions: 4. At any stage of the proceeding, even for the first
1. Cases where the court may dismiss a case motu time on appeal and even if no such defense is
propio; [Rule 9, Sec. 1] raised in the answer.
2. Failure to prosecute; [Rule 17, Sec. 3]
3. Sec. 4, Revised Rule on Summary Procedure. NOTE: The rule refers to the subject matter of each
particular claim and not only to that of the suit. Hence.
other initiatory pleadings included.
GROUNDS: Rule 16, Sec. 1
1. Lack of jurisdiction over the defendant’s person Where a party invokes the jurisdiction of a court to obtain
2. Lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter of the affirmative relief and fails, he cannot thereafter repudiate
claim such jurisdiction. While the issue of jurisdiction may be
3. Improper venue raised at any time, he is estopped as it is tantamount to
4. Plaintiff’s lack of legal capacity to sue speculating on the fortunes of litigation (Crisostomo, et al.
5. Litis pendentia v. CA)
6. Res judicata
7. Prescription
8. Failure to state a cause of action Improper Venue
9. Extinguished claim
10. Unenforceable claim under the Statute of Frauds
48
Unless and until the defendant objects to the venue in a
MTD prior to a responsive pleading, the venue cannot It does not require that the later case be dismissed in
truly be said to have been improperly laid since, for all favor of the earlier case. To determine which case should
practical intents and purposes, the venue though be abated, apply:
technically wrong may yet be considered acceptable to 1. The More Appropriate Action Test;
the parties for whose convenience the rules on venue had 2. The Interest of Justice Test, taking into account:
been devised. Improper venue may be waived and such a. Nature of the controversy;
waiver may occur by laches. [Diaz v. Adiong (1993)] b. Comparative accessibility of the court to the
parties;
Where a motion to dismiss for improper venue is c. Other similar factors.
erroneously denied, the remedy is prohibition (Enriquez
v. Macadaeg) In both tests, the parties’ good faith shall be taken into
consideration.
Where the plaintiffs filed the action in a court of improper
venue and thereafter submitted to its jurisdiction, the The 1st case shall be abated if it is merely an anticipatory
issue of venue was thereby waived and they are in action or defense against an expected suit. The 2nd case
estoppel to repudiate or question the proceedings in said will not be abated if it is not brought to harass. [Vitrionics
court (Vda. De Suan, et al. v. Cusi, et al.) Computers v. RTC (1993)]
Prescription applies only when the complaint on its face If the court finds the allegations of the complaint to be
shows that indeed the action has already prescribed. sufficient but doubts their veracity, it must deny the MTD
and require the defendant to answer and then proceed to
If the fact of prescription is not indicated on the face of try the case on its merits.
the complaint and the same may be brought out later, the
court must defer decision on the motion until such time as A complaint containing a premature cause of action may
proof may be presented on such fact of prescription. be dismissed for failure to state a cause of action.
RESOLUTION OF MOTION
REMEDIES OF THE DEFENDANT WHEN MOTION IS
During the hearing of the motion: Parties shall submit: DENIED
1. Their arguments on questions of law
2. Their evidence on questions of fact (Rule 16, Sec. Appeal is NOT a remedy since denial of a motion to
2) dismiss is an interlocutory order. As a general rule,
a. Exception: Those not available at that time defendant files his answer and then may appeal an
adverse judgment.
Parties should be allowed to present evidence and the
evidence should be taken down Remedies of Defendant:
51
May be filed by any
May be filed only by the
1. The movant shall file his answer within the defending party against
defendant against the
balance of the period described in Rule 11 to whom a claim is asserted
complaint of the plaintiff
which he was entitled at the time of serving his in the action
motion, but not less than 5 days in any event. Should be filed within the May be filed for the
a. If pleading is ordered to be amended, he shall time for but prior to the dismissal of the case only
file his answer within the period prescribed filing of the answer of the after the plaintiff has
by Rule 11 counted from service of amended defending party to the completed the
pleading unless the court provides a longer pleading asserting the presentation of his
period claim against him evidence
If denied, defendant must
2. Another remedy is to file a certiorari, case under If denied, defendant may
file an answer, or else he
Rule 65 alleging grave abuse of discretion. present evidence
may be declared in default
[Riano] If granted, plaintiff appeals
If granted, plaintiff may
and the order of dismissal
appeal or if subsequent
is reversed, defendant
EFFECT OF DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT ON CERTAIN case is not barred, he may
loses his right to present
GROUNDS re-file the case
evidence
52
DISMISSAL OF ACTIONS the case and dismiss the case, then the
compulsory counterclaim, being ancillary to
DISMISSAL UPON NOTICE BY PLAINTIFF; TWO- the principal controversy must likewise be
DISMISSAL RULE (Rule 17, Sec. 1) dismissed (Metals Engineering Resources v.
CA)
Dismissal by plaintiff as a matter of right - However, under this section, if a counterclaim
has been pleaded by a defendant PRIOR to the
Dismissal is effected not by motion but by mere notice of service upon him of the plaintiff’s motion for
dismissal which is a matter of right before the service of: dismissal, the dismissal shall be limited to the
1. The answer; or complaint.
2. A motion for summary judgment
Such dismissal shall be without prejudice to the right of
The dismissal as a matter of right ceases when an answer the defendant to either:
or a motion for summary judgment is served on the 1. Prosecute his counterclaim in a separate action;
plaintiff and not when the answer or the motion is filed a. In this case, the court should render the
with the court. corresponding order granting and reserving
his right to prosecute his claim in a separate
Dismissal NOT Automatic - It requires an order by the complaint
court confirming the dismissal. Until confirmed, the 2. OR to have the same resolved in the same action
withdrawal does not take effect a. In this case, defendant must manifest such
preference to the trial court within 15 days
Generally, Dismissal is Without Prejudice from notice to him of plaintiff’s motion to
General Rule: Dismissal is without prejudice dismiss
Exceptions:
1. Where the notice of dismissal so provides; or NOTE: These alternative remedies of the
2. Where the plaintiff has previously dismissed the defendant are available to him regardless of
same case in a court of competent jurisdiction whether his counterclaim is compulsory or
(Two Dismissal Rule) permissive
3. Even where the notice of dismissal does not
provide that it is with prejudice but it is premised
on the fact of payment by the defendant of the DISMISSAL DUE TO FAULT OF PLAINTIFF (Rule 17, Sec.
claim involved (Serrano v. Cabrera) 3)
Two Dismissal Rule - when the same complaint had twice Distinction between Sec. 2 and Sec. 3 of Rule 17
been dismissed by the plaintiff without order of the court
by simply filing a notice of dismissal, the 2nd dismissal SECTION 2 SECTION 3
operates as an adjudication on the merits. Dismissal is not procured
Dismissal is at the by plaintiff though justified
instance of the plaintiff by causes imputable to
DISMISSAL UPON MOTION BY PLAINTIFF; EFFECT ON him
EXISTING COUNTERCLAIM (Rule 17, Sec. 2) Dismissal is a matter of
procedure, without
Dismissal is a matter of
Under this section, dismissal of the complaint is subject to prejudice unless
evidence, an adjudication
the discretion of the court and upon such terms and otherwise stated in the
on the merits
conditions as may be just. court order or on motion
to dismiss
Generally, Dismissal is Without Prejudice Dismissal is without
General Rule: Dismissal is without prejudice prejudice to the right of
Exceptions: defendant to prosecute his
1. When otherwise stated in the motion to dismiss; counterclaim in a Dismissal is without
or separation action unless prejudice to the right of
2. When stated to be with prejudice in the order of within 15 days from defendant to prosecute his
the court notice of motion he counterclaim on the same
manifests his intention to or separate action
Effect on Counterclaim: have his counterclaim
resolved in the same
If counterclaim has been pleaded by defendant prior to action
service upon him of plaintiff’s motion for dismissal,
dismissal shall be limited to the complaint Dismissal under this Section
- Remember that if the civil case is dismissed, so
also is the counterclaim filed therein The case may be dismissed motu proprio or upon the
It was held that if the court does not have defendant’s motion if, without justifiable cause, plaintiff
jurisdiction to entertain the main action of fails either:
53
1. To appear on the date of the presentation of his court to answer. (Arellano v. CFI-
evidence-in-chief on the complaint; Sorsogon)
a. The plaintiff’s failure to appear at the trial
after he has presented his evidence and Effect of Dismissal:
rested his case does not warrant the General Rule: Dismissal of actions under Sec. 3 which do
dismissal of the case on the ground of failure not expressly state whether they are with or without
to prosecute. prejudice are held to be with prejudice on the merits
b. It is merely a waiver of his right to cross- Exceptions:
examine and to object to the admissibility of 1. The court declares otherwise, without prejudice
evidence. [Jalover v. Ytoriaga (1977)] to the right of the defendant to prosecute his
c. Since plaintiff’s presence is now required counter-claim in the same or separate action
only during the presentation of his evidence 2. If court has not yet acquired jurisdiction over the
in chief, his absence during the presentation person of the defendant
of defendant or other parties’ evidence, or
even at rebuttal or subsequent stages, is not Effect on Counterclaim:
a ground for dismissal.
Defendant is granted the choice to prosecute that
2. To prosecute his action for an unreasonable counterclaim in either the same or a separate action, just
length of time (nolle prosequi); like the grant of that remedy in Sec. 6, Rule 16
a. The test for dismissal of a case due to failure
to prosecute is WON, under the In this section (as well as in Sec. 6, Rule 16), defendant is
circumstances, the plaintiff is chargeable not required to manifest his preference within a 15-day
with want of due diligence in failing to period as in Sec. 2
proceed with reasonable promptitude. - The motions to dismiss in this section and in Sec.
[Calalang v. CA (1993)] 6, Rule 16, are filed by defendant who perforce
b. The dismissal of an action pursuant to this has already deliberated upon the course of action
rule rests upon the sound discretion of the he intends to take on his counterclaim and which
court ( Smith Bell and Co. v. American he may even manifest right in his motion to
President Lines Ltd.) dismiss
c. The action should never be dismissed on a - The dismissal in Sec. 2 is at the instance of
non-suit for want of prosecution when the plaintiff, hence, defendant is granted the time and
delay was caused by the parties looking duty to manifest preference within 15 days from
towards a settlement. (Goldloop Properties notice, after an opportunity to study the situation
Inc. v. CA)
3. To comply with the Rules or any court order. DISMISSAL OF COUNTERCLAIM, CROSS-CLAIM, OR
a. The order must be valid THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT
b. Failure to comply with order:
(1) Dismissal for failure to comply with Provisions of Rule 17 shall apply to the dismissal of any
order to amend complaint to make counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party complaint
claims asserted more definite is ground
for dismissal (Santos v. General Wood Voluntary dismissal by claimant by notice as in Sec. 1,
Craft) shall be made:
(2) Failure to comply with an order to 1. Before a responsive pleading or motion for
include indispensable parties is ground summary judgment is served; or
for dismissal (Aranico-Rubino v. Aquino) 2. If there is none, before introduction of evidence
(3) The failure to comply with order of new at trial or hearing
judge to recall witness so he may
observe demeanor is sufficient ground Effect of Dismissals
for dismissal (Castillo v. Torres) 1. Dismissal or continuance of an action operates to
c. Failure to comply with rules annul orders, ruling, or judgments previously
(1) The failure of the parties to submit a made in the case
compromise agreement within period 2. It also annuls all proceedings had in connection
granted to them by court is not a ground therewith and renders all pleadings ineffective
for dismissal (Goldloop Properties Inc. v. 3. Dismissal or non-suit leaves the situation as
CA) though no suit had ever been brought
(2) Dismissal is improper where a 3rd party
complaint has been admitted and the 3rd Where a counterclaim is made the subject of a separate
party defendant had not yet been suit, it may be abated upon a plea of auter action
summoned (Sotto v. Valenzuela) pendentia and/or dismissal on the ground of res judicata.
(3) A case may be dismissed for failure to Res judicata, however, is not applicable since the court
answer written interrogatories under held that it did not acquire jurisdiction due to non-
Rule 25 even without an order from the payment of docket fees.
54
Dismissal on the ground of LOJ does not constitute res
judicata, there being no consideration and adjudication of
the case on the merits. Neither is there litis pendentia.
[Meliton v. CA (1992)]
55
PRE-TRIAL
Primary Objective
CONCEPT OF PRE-TRIAL Pre-trial is primarily intended to make certain that all
issues necessary to the disposition of a case are properly
Pre-Trial is a mandatory conference and personal raised.
confrontation before the judge between the parties and
their respective counsel, called by the court after the Thus, to obviate the element of surprise, parties are
joinder of issues in a case or after the last pleading has expected to disclose at a pre-trial conference (PTC) all
been filed and before trial, for the purpose of settling the issues of law and fact which they intend to raise at the
litigation expeditiously or simplifying the issues without trial, except such as may involve privileged or impeaching
sacrificing the necessary demands of justice. matters. The determination of issues at a pre-trial
conference bars the consideration of other questions on
It is a procedural device by which the court is called upon, appeal. [Caltex v. CA (1992)]
after the filing of the last pleading, to compel the parties
and their lawyers to appear before it, and negotiate an
amicable settlement or otherwise make a formal
settlement and embody in a single document the issues of NOTICE OF PRE-TRIAL
fact and law involved in the action, and such other
matters as may aid in the prompt disposition in the case, When pre-trial conducted - After the last pleading has
such as: been served and filed, it shall be the duty of the plaintiff to
1. Number of witnesses promptly move ex parte that the case be set for pre-trial.
2. Tenor or character of their testimonies (Sec. 1, Rule 18)
3. Documentary evidence; nature and purpose of 1. Specifically, the motion is to be filed within 5
each days after the last pleading joining the issues has
4. Number of trial dates been served and filed (Admin Circ. No. 3-99, Jan
15, 1999)
2. Within 5 days from date of filing of the reply,
NATURE AND PURPOSE plaintiff must promptly move ex-parte that the
case be set for pre-trial conference. If the plaintiff
Purpose of pre-trial is to consider: (Rule 18, Sec. 2) fails to file said motion within the given period,
1. Possibility of an amicable settlement or of a the branch clerk shall issue a Notice of Pre-Trial
submission to alternative modes of dispute (AM No. 03-109-SC, July 13, 2004)
resolution;
2. Simplification of the issues; NOTE: Note: The “Last Pleading” need not be literally
3. Necessity/desirability of amendments to the construed as the actual filing of the last pleading. For
pleadings; purpose of pre-trial, the expiration of the period for filing
4. Possibility of obtaining stipulations or the last pleading is sufficient (Sarmiento v. Juan)
admissions of facts and of documents to avoid
unnecessary proof; Notice of Pre-trial: The notice shall be served on:
5. Limitation of the number of witnesses; 1. Counsel
6. Advisability of a preliminary reference of issues 2. Party, only if he has no counsel (Sec. 3, Rule 18)
to a commissioner;
7. Propriety of rendering judgment on the The sufficiency of the written notice of pre-trial is
pleadings, or summary judgment, or of irrelevant where evidence shows that counsel and the
dismissing the action should a valid ground parties actually knew of the pre-trial (Bembo v. CA)
therefor be found to exist;
8. Advisability/necessity of suspending the
proceedings; and APPEARANCE OF PARTIES; EFFECT OF FAILURE TO
9. Other matters that may aid in the prompt APPEAR
disposition of the action.
Duty to Appear: It is the duty of the parties and their
Pre-trial is Mandatory counsel to appear at the pre-trial. (Rule 18, Sec. 4)
- Vital objective: the simplification, abbreviation, - NOTE: BOTH parties AND their counsel
and expedition of the trial, if not indeed its
dispensation When non-appearance is excused: A party’s non-
- Mandatory nature is addressed to both court and appearance may be excused only if either:
parties: 1. Valid cause is shown for it;
Court must set the case for pre-trial and 2. A representative appears in his behalf, fully
notify the parties as well as counsel to authorized in writing:
appear a. To enter into an amicable settlement;
Parties with their counsel are obliged to obey b. To submit to alternative modes of dispute
the order of the court to that effect resolution;
c. To enter into stipulations/admissions of facts
and of documents.
56
NOTE: The written special authority must be
in the form of an SPA (Sec. 23, Rule 38). If the
party is a corporation, the SPA must be
supported by a board resolution. PRE-TRIAL BRIEF; EFFECT OF FAILURE TO FILE
Effect of Failure to Appear; unexcused non-appearance: Rule 18, Sec. 6 makes it the MANDATORY duty of the
(Rule 18, Sec. 5) parties to seasonably file their pre-trial briefs under the
conditions and with the sanctions provided therein.
Order of Non-suit is issued to the party who failed to
appear at pre-trial. When to File Pre-Trial Brief: Parties shall file and serve
their respective pre-trial briefs, ensuring receipt by
Who fails to adverse party at least 3 days before the date of the pre-
Effect
appear trial.
Cause for dismissal of the action which
Plaintiff will be with prejudice, unless otherwise Contents of a Pre-Trial Brief
ordered by the court 1. Statement of their willingness to enter into
Cause to allow plaintiff to present amicable settlement or alternative modes of
Defendant evidence ex parte, and court to render dispute resolution, indicating the desired terms
judgment on the basis thereof thereof;
2. Summary of admitted facts and proposed
NOTE: The non-appearance of defendant in pre-trial is stipulation of facts;
not a ground to declare him in default. Thus, we 3. Issues to be tried/resolved;
distinguish: 4. Documents/exhibits to be presented, stating the
purpose thereof;
5. Manifestation of their having availed or their
intention to avail themselves of discovery
Default by defendant Failure to appear by procedures or referral to commissioners;
(Rule 9, Sec. 3) defendant (Rule 18, Sec. 5) 6. Number and names of the witnesses, and the
substance of their respective testimonies. [AM
Upon motion and notice to No. 03-1-09-SC]
Not required
defendant.
Requires proof of failure to Failure to File Pre-trial Brief: Failure to file the pre-trial
Not required brief shall have the same effect as failure to appear at the
answer
Court to allow plaintiff to pre-trial.
Court to render judgment,
present evidence ex parte,
unless it requires Remedy of defendant is to file a motion for
then the court shall render
submission of evidence reconsideration, showing that his failure to file a trial
judgment
Judgment by Default Judgment Ex Parte brief was due to fraud, accident, mistake, or excusable
Relief awarded must be the Relief awarded may be of negligence
same in nature and amount different nature and
as prayed for in the amount from the relief
complaint prayed for PROCEEDINGS AFTER TERMINATION OF PRE-TRIAL
When we say that a defendant is in “default” it speaks of Record of Pre-Trial: The pre-trial proceedings shall be
his failure to file responsive pleading and not his non- recorded. Upon termination of such proceedings, the
appearance at pre-trial. court shall issue the pre-trial order.
2. For a non-suited defendant: Effect of Pre-Trial Order: The contents of the order shall
a. File a motion for reconsideration without control the subsequent course of the action; UNLESS:
need for affidavits of merits regarding the 1. Modified before trial to prevent manifest
fraud, accident, mistake, or excusable injustice (Rule 18, Sec. 7)
negligence (Lucero v. Dacayo) 2. Issues impliedly included therein or may be
inferable therefrom by necessary implication
(Velasco v. Apostol)
57
3. Amendment to conform to evidence (Rule 10, “Minutes of Preliminary
Sec. 5) Conference” to be
signed by both parties
and/or counsel.
On Compromise: (Note: either party or
- Upon manifestation of the parties of their his counsel is allowed
willingness to discuss a compromise, the TC to sign)
should order the suspension of the proceedings The sanctions for non- Sanctions are imposed
to allow them reasonable time to discuss and appearance are upon the counsel for
conclude an amicable settlement. imposed upon the the accused or the
- If despite all efforts exerted by the TC and the plaintiff and the prosecutor [Rule 118,
parties the settlement conference still fails, then defendant [Rule 18, Sec. Sec. 3]
the action should have continued as if no 4]
suspension had taken place. [Goldloop Properties A pre-trial brief is A pre-trial brief is not
v. CA (1992)] specifically required to specifically required.
- NOTE: AM 03-1-09-SC - No termination of pre- be submitted [Rule 18,
trial for failure to settle Sec. 6]
58
Modes of Alternative Dispute Resolutions: 3. Interim Measures of Protection;
4. Appointment of Arbitrator;
1. Arbitration (RA 9285, Sec. 1) 5. Challenge to Appointment of Arbitrator;
a. A voluntary dispute resolution process in 6. Termination of Mandate of Arbitrator;
which one or more arbitrators, appointed in 7. Assistance in Taking Evidence;
accordance with the agreement of the 8. Confirmation, Correction or Vacation of Award in
parties, or rules promulgated pursuant to Domestic Arbitration;
this Act, resolve a dispute by rendering an 9. Recognition and Enforcement or Setting Aside of
award\ an Award in International Commercial
b. Different Kinds: Arbitration;
(1) Domestic Arbitration – an arbritration 10. Recognition and Enforcement of a Foreign
that is not international; governed by RA Arbitral Award;
876 (Arbitration Law) [RA 9285, Sec. 32] 11. Confidentiality/Protective Orders; and
(2) International Arbitration - An arbitration 12. Deposit and Enforcement of Mediated Settlement
is international if: Agreements.
(a) the parties to an arbitration
agreement have, at the time of the Service and Filing of Petition – The petitioner shall serve,
conclusion of that agreement, their either by personal service or courier, a copy of the
places of business in different States; petition upon the respondent before the filing thereof.
or Proof of service shall be attached to the petition filed in
(b) one of the following places is court.
situated outside the State in which
the parties have their places of Notice – served once court finds petition sufficient in form
business [Article 3, Model Law on and substance
International Commercial 1. Notice is sent to parties directing them to appear
Arbritration] at a particular time and date for hearing
2. Hearing shall not be set no later than 5 days from
2. Mediation lapse of period for filing opposition or comment
a. a voluntary process in which a mediator, 3. Notice to respondent shall contain a statement
selected by the disputing parties, facilitates allowing him to file a comment or opposition to
communication and negotiation, and assist petition within 15 days from receipt of notice
the parties in reaching a voluntary 4. For Referral to ADR or Confidentiality/Protection
agreement regarding a dispute Orders:
b. includes conciliation a. Follow Rule 15 Rules of Court
If evidence is
TRIAL insufficient to prove
plaintiff’s cause of
action or defendant’s
counterclaim, court
rules in favor of
either one or
dismisses the case
COURT RENDERS
DECISION
60
INTERVENTION may be fully protected in a separate proceeding. [Virra
Mall Tenants v. Virra Mall (2011)]
DEFINITION
2. If intervention is granted
MEANING OF LEGAL INTEREST a. A grant of a motion to intervene is
interlocutory
Interest must be of a direct and immediate character so b. Hence, anyone who objects can file a petition
that the intervenor will either gain or lose by the direct for certiorari for improper granting of
legal operation of the judgment. The interest must be intervention
actual and material, a concern which is more than mere
curiosity, or academic or sentimental desire; it must not
be indirect and contingent, indirect and remote,
conjectural, consequential or collateral. [Virra Mall
Tenants v. Virra Mall (2011)]
61
SUBPOENA
A process directed to a person requiring him to bring with
DEFINITION him books, documents, or other things under his control
Subpoena is a process directed to a person requiring him: The SDT is, in all respects, like the ordinary SAT with the
1. To attend and to testify at the hearing or the trial exception that it concludes with an injunction that the
of an action, or at any investigation conducted by witness shall bring with him and produce at the
competent authority, or for the taking of his examination the books, documents, or things described in
deposition; or the subpoena
2. To bring with him any books, documents, or
other things under his control (Rule 21, Sec. 1) Before SDT may issue, the court must first be satisfied
that the following requisites are present:
SUBPOENA SUMMONS 1. Test of RELEVANCY: The books, documents, or
An order to appear and other things requested must appear prima facie
An order to answer relevant to the issue subject of the controversy
testify or to produce
complaint 2. Test of DEFINITENESS: Such books must be
books and documents
May be served to a non- reasonably described by the parties to be readily
Served on the defendant identified (test of definiteness)
party
Needs tender of
kilometrage, attendance Does not need tender of
fee and reasonable cost of kilometrage and other fees
production fee SERVICE OF SUBPOENA (Rule 21, Sec. 6)
Who May Issue: (Rule 21, Sec. 2) How Made: Same manner as PERSONAL or SUBSTITUTED
1. Court before whom the witness is required to service of summons
attend
2. Court of the place where the deposition is to be Formalities:
taken 1. The original shall be exhibited
3. Officer or body authorized by law to do so in 2. A copy is delivered to the person on whom it is
connection with investigations conducted by said served
officer or body; or 3. Fees and costs:
4. Any justice of the SC or of the CA, in any case or a. Tender to the person on whom it is served
investigation pending within the Philippines the fees for one day’s attendance and the
kilometrage allowed by the Rules
NOTE: Sec. 38(2), BP 129 – All processes issued by the (1) EXCEPT: Tender need not be made if
MTC and MCTC in cases falling within their jurisdiction issued by or on behalf of the Republic or
may be served anywhere in the Philippines without the an officer of agency thereof
necessity of certification by the judge of the RTC
b. If SDT, reasonable cost of producing the
Form and Contents: (Rule 21, Sec. 3) books, documents, or things demanded shall
1. Shall state the name of the court and the title of also be tendered
the action or investigation
2. Shall be directed to the person whose attendance Service must be made so as to allow the witness
is required reasonable time for preparation and travel to the place of
3. In case of a subpoena duces tecum, shall contain a attendance
reasonable description of the books, documents,
or things demanded which must appear to the
court to be prima facie relevant
COMPELLING ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES;
Kinds: CONTEMPT
1. Subpoena duces tecum (SDT)
2. Subpoena ad testificandum (SAT) General Rule:
1. The court which issued the subpoena may issue a
warrant for the arrest of the witness and make
SUBPOENA AD TESTIFICANDUM him pay the cost of such warrant and seizure, if
the court should determine that his disobedience
A process directed to a person requiring him to attend was willful and without just cause (Sec. 8)
and to testify at the hearing or the trial of an action, or at
any investigation conducted by competent authority or 2. The refusal to obey a subpoena without adequate
for the taking of his deposition cause shall be deemed contempt of the court
issuing it (Sec. 9)
Grounds:
1. For quashal of subpoena duces tecum:
a. It is unreasonable and oppressive
b. The articles sought to be produced do not
appear prima facie to be relevant to the
issues; or
c. The person asking for the subpoena does not
advance the cost for the production of the
articles desired
d. Failure to tender witness fees and
kilometrage allowed by the Rules
63
MODES OF DISCOVERY 2. Without leave of court
a. AFTER answer has been served
DISCOVERY – a device employed by a party to obtain Depositions before an answer should be granted only
information about relevant matters on the case from the under special circumstances where the conditions
adverse party in the preparation for trial point to the necessity of presenting a strong case for
allowance of the motion.
Purpose – to enable the parties to obtain the fullest There must be some “necessity” or “good reason” for
possible knowledge of the issues and evidence long taking the testimony immediately or that it would be
before the trial to prevent such trial from being carried on prejudicial to the party seeking the order to be
in the dark compelled to await joinder of issues.
64
party rights as a witness and may be impeached like a
By any party for any court witness because Sections 3 to 18 of Rule
Witness, whether or not a 132 apply to deponent. [Rule 23, Sec. 3]
purpose if the court finds
party
the 5 instances occurring
5. The officer before whom the deposition is being
NOTE: Depositions can be used as evidence by a party taken has no authority to rule on objections
(“for any purpose”) under the specific conditions in Sec. 4 interposed during the course of the deposition
although any objections shall be noted by him
REMEMBER: Generally, a deposition is not generally upon the deposition. Any evidence that is
supposed to be a substitute for the actual testimony in objected to shall still be taken but subject to the
open court of a party or witness. If the witness is available objection. [Rule 23, Sec. 17]
to testify, he should be presented in court to testify. If
available to testify, a party’s or witness’ deposition is When may objections to admissibility be made (Rule 23,
inadmissible in evidence for being hearsay. (Dasmarinas Sec. 6) - Objection may be made at the TRIAL or HEARING
Garments Inc. v. Reyes, 1993). Exceptions to this rule are to receiving in evidence any deposition or part thereof for
those found in Sec. 4. any reason which would require the exclusion of the
evidence if the witness were then present and testifying
Persons before whom depositions may be taken (Rule 23,
Sec. 10 and 11) Effect of Taking and Using Depositions:
1. Within the Philippines:
a. Judge 1. General Rule: A party shall not be deemed to
b. Notary Public, or make a person his own witness for any purpose
c. Any person authorized to administer oaths, by taking his deposition because depositions are
as stipulated by the parties in writing taken for discovery and not for use as evidence.
(Rule 23, Sec. 7)
2. Outside the Philippines
a. On notice before a secretary of embassy or 2. Exception: If a party offers the deposition in
legation, consul general, consul, vice-consul, evidence, then he is deemed to have made the
or consular agent of the Philippines deponent his witness (Sec. 8)
b. Before such person or officer as may be
appointed by commission or under letter 3. Exceptions to the Exception:
rogatory or a. The deposition is that of an opposing party,
c. Any person authorized to administer oaths OR
as stipulated by parties in writing b. The deposition is used to impeach or
contradict opponent. (Sec. 8)
Disqualification by interest: No deposition shall be taken
before a person who is: (Rule 23, Sec. 13) When may taking of deposition be terminated or its scope
1. A relative within the 6th degree of affinity or limited (Rule 23, Sec. 18)
consanguinity
2. An employee or counsel of any of the parties 1. How done:
3. A relative within the same degree or employee of a. A motion or petition for termination or limit
such counsel examination is filed by any party or of the
4. Financially interested in the action deponent
b. Filed in the court where the action is pending
Procedure in Taking Depositions: OR the RTC of the place where deposition is
1. A party desiring to take the deposition of any being taken
person upon oral examination shall give
reasonable notice in writing to every party to the 2. When done: At any time during the taking of
action stating the time and place for taking the deposition
deposition and the name and address of each
person to be examined. [Rule 23, Sec. 15] 3. Grounds: That the examination is being
conducted:
2. After the notice is served, the court may make a. In bad faith, or
any order for the protection of the parties and b. In such manner as unreasonably to annoy,
the deponent. [Rule 23, Sec. 16] embarrass or oppress the deponent or party
3. The attendance of the witnesses may be Effect of Errors and Irregularities in Depositions (Rule 23,
compelled by the use of subpoenas. [Rule 23, Sec. Sec. 29)
1]
Error and
Effect
4. The deponent may be examined or cross Irregularities
examined following the procedures for witnesses As to notice for Waived
in a trial. He may be asked questions on direct, taking
Unless written objection is promptly
cross, re-direct or re-cross. He has the same depositions
65
served upon party giving notice DEPOSITIONS BEFORE ACTION OR PENDING APPEAL
Waived (Rule 24)
Objection to
Unless made:
taking A deposition before action and a deposition pending
1. Before taking of deposition
deposition appeal are referred to as perpetuation of testimony
begins or
because of (perpetuam rei memoriam) because their objective is to
2. As soon thereafter as
disqualification perpetuate the testimony of a witness for future use.
disqualification becomes
of officer before
known or could be
whom it is to be Purpose: To perpetuate the testimony of witnesses for
discovered with reasonable
taken probable use in the event of further proceedings in said
diligence
Objection to the Not waived by failure to make them court.
competency of a before or during the taking of
witness or deposition Who may avail: Any person:
competency or 1. Who wants to perpetuate his own testimony; or
Unless the ground of the objection is 2. Who wants to perpetuate the testimony of
relevancy or
one which might have been obviated another person
materiality of
or removed if presented at that time
testimony
In the manner of taking, in the form Procedure for Deposition Pending Action:
of questions or answers, in the oath
Occurring at or affirmation, or in conduct of 1. File a verified petition in the court of the place of
oral parties and errors of any kind which the residence of any expected adverse party
examination might be obviated or removed if a. Petition shall be entitled in the name of
and other promptly prosecuted are waived petitioner
particulars Unless reasonable objection thereto b. It shall show:
is made at the time of taking the (1) That the petitioner expects to be a party
deposition to an action in a court of the Philippines
Waived but is presently unable to bring it or
Objections to cause it to be brought;
Unless served in writing upon the
the form of (2) The subject matter of the expected action
party propounding them within the
written and his interest therein;
time allowed for serving succeeding
interrogatories (3) The facts which he desires to establish
cross or other interrogatories and
under Sec. 25 by the proposed testimony and his
within 3 days after service of last
and 26 reasons for desiring to perpetuate it;
interrogatories authorized
In the manner Waived (4) The names or a description of the
in which persons he expects will be adverse
Unless motion to suppress parties and their addresses so far as
testimony is
depositions or some part thereof is known; and
transcribed or
made with reasonable promptness (5) The names and addresses of the persons
in the
after such defect is ascertained, or to be examined and the substance of the
preparation
with due diligence might have been testimony which he expects to elicit from
under Sec. 17,
ascertained each, and shall ask for an order
19, 20, and 26
authorizing the petitioner to take the
depositions of the persons to be
Orders that may be issued by the court regarding
deposition taking examined named in the petition for the
purpose of perpetuating their testimony.
1. That the deposition shall not be taken;
2. That it may be taken at some designated place
other than that stated in the notice; 2. Notice and service to each person named in the
petition as an expected adverse party, together
3. That it may be taken only on written
with a copy of the petition, stating that the
interrogatories;
4. That certain matters shall not be inquired into’ petitioner will apply to the court, at a time and
place named therein, for the order described in
5. That the scope of the examination shall be held
the petition.
with no one present except the parties to the
action and their officers or counsel;
6. That after being sealed, the deposition shall be 3. At least twenty (20) days before the date of the
hearing, the court shall cause notice thereof to be
opened only by order of the court;
served on the parties and prospective deponents
7. That secret processes, developments, or research
need not be disclosed; in the manner provided for service of summons.
8. That the parties shall simultaneously file
4. Order and Examination: If the court is satisfied
specified documents or information enclosed in
sealed envelopes to be opened as directed by the that the perpetuation of the testimony may
prevent a failure or delay of justice, it shall make
court;
an order designating or describing the persons
whose deposition may be taken and specifying
the subject matter of the examination and
66
whether the depositions shall be taken upon oral WRITTEN INTERROGATORIES TO ADVERSE PARTIES
examination or written interrogatories. (Rule 25)
Use of Deposition: If a deposition to perpetuate testimony Purpose - This mode of discovery is availed of by the party
is taken under this Rule, or if, although not so taken, it to the action for the purpose of eliciting material and
would be admissible in evidence, it may be used in any relevant facts from any of the adverse party. [Rule 25, Sec.
action involving the same subject matter subsequently 1]
brought in accordance with the provisions of sections 4
and 5 of Rule 23. (Rule 24, Sec. 6) Service of Interrogatories to Parties – Any party desiring to
elicit material and relevant facts from any adverse party
Procedure for Deposition Pending Appeal: shall file and serve upon the adverse party written
interrogatories to be answered by the party served.
1. During the pendency of an appeal, the court in
which the judgment was rendered may allow the NOTE: Written interrogatories must not only be
taking of depositions of witnesses to perpetuate served but also filed.
their testimony in the event of further
proceedings in the said court. Manner of Service:
1. Without leave of court – After answer has
2. The party who desires to perpetuate the been served; and for the first set of
testimony may make a motion in the said court interrogatories
for leave to take the depositions, upon the same 2. With leave of court – before the answer has
notice and service thereof as if the action was been served; and for subsequent sets of
pending therein. The motion shall state: interrogatories
a. The names and addresses of the persons to
be examined and the substance of the NOTE: No party may, without leave of court,
testimony which he expects to elicit from serve more than one set of interrogatories to
each, and be answered by the same party. (Rule 25,
b. The reason for perpetuating their testimony. Sec. 4)
3. Order allowing the deposition: If the court finds Answer to Interrogatories: (Rule 25, Sec. 2)
that the perpetuation of the testimony is proper 1. Written interrogatories and the answers thereto
to avoid a failure or delay of justice, it may make must both be filed and served
an order allowing the deposition to be taken. a. Hence, the answers may constitute as judicial
admissions (Sec. 4, Rule 129)
2. Form of answer:
a. It must be answered fully in writing
b. And signed and sworn to by the person
making them
Grounds:
1. They require the statements of conclusions of law
or answers to hypothetical questions or opinion,
or mere hearsay, or matters not within the
personal knowledge of the interrogated party
67
2. Frivolous interrogatories need not be answered REQUEST FOR ADMISSION (Rule 26)
(Herrera)
Rule 26, as a mode of discovery, contemplates
Scope and Use of Interrogatories (Rule 25, Sec. 5) interrogatories seeking clarification in order to determine
the truth of the allegation in a pleading.
Interrogatories may relate to any matters than can be
inquired into under Sec. 2, Rule 23 Purposes:
1. To allow one party to request the adverse in
Answers may be used for the same purposes provided in writing to admit certain material and relevant
Sec. 4, Rule 23 matters which most likely will not be disputed
during the trial.
Effect of Failure to Serve Written Interrogatories (Rule 25, 2. To avoid unnecessary inconvenience to the
Sec. 6) parties in going through the rigors of proof,
before the trial, a party may request the other to:
A party not served with written interrogatories may not a. Admit the genuineness of any material and
be compelled by adverse party to: relevant document described in and
1. Give testimony in open court; or exhibited with the request; or
2. Give deposition pending appeal b. Admit the truth of any material and relevant
matter of fact set forth in the request [Rule
UNLESS thereafter allowed by the court for good cause 26, Sec. 1]
shown and to prevent a failure of justice
How made:
NOTE: This should not be confused with the 1. A party files and serves upon any other party a
provisions of Rule 29. Sec. 6 Rule 25 as well as a written request
similar provision in Rule 26 are directed to a 2. Copies of the documents shall be served with the
party who fails or refuses to resort to discovery request unless already furnished
procedures therein. Rule 29 provides for
sanctions or other consequences upon a party When made: At any time after issues have been joined.
who refuses or fails to comply with discovery
procedures duly availed of by his opponent The request for admission MUST BE SERVED ON THE
PARTY and NOT ON THE COUNSEL. This is an exception
Written Interrogatories v. Interrogatories to Parties to the general rule that notices shall be served upon
counsel and not upon the party. (Duque v. CA, 2002)
Written Interrogatories Interrogatories to Implied Admission by Adverse Party (Rule 26, Sec. 2)
Parties
The deposition is takes There is no Each of the matters which an admission is requested shall
before a deposition officer deposition officer. be deemed admitted UNLESS the party to whom request
Questions are prepared is directed files and serves upon the party requesting
beforehand. These are admission a SWORN STATEMENT
submitted to the deposition The questioning is 1. Contents of the sworn statement:
officer who will ask the direct. a. Denying specifically the matters of which an
deponent the questions and admission is requested, or
he will record the answers. b. Setting forth in detail the reasons why he
The deposition of any The deposition of cannot truthfully either admit or deny those
person may be taken, the parties are only matters
whether he is a party or not. taken.
2. Period to file and serve the sworn statement
a. Within a period designated in the request
b. Which shall not be less than 15 days after
service thereof, or
c. Within such further time as the court may
allow on motion
68
1. Any admission made by a party pursuant to such PRODUCTION OR INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS OR
request is for the purpose of the pending action THINGS (Rule 27)
only
2. It shall not: Rule 27 applies only to a PENDING ACTION and the
a. Constitute an admission by him for any other documentary things subject of the motion must be only
purpose; nor WITHIN the possession, control, or custody of a party
b. Be used against him in any other proceeding
PRODUCTION OR
Effect of Failure to File and Serve Request for Admission INSPECTION OF SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
(Rule 26, Sec. 5) DOCUMENTS OR THINGS
Essentially a mode of A means of compelling
A party who fails to file and serve a request for admission discovery production of evidence
on the adverse party of material and relevant fact at issue It may be directed to a
which are, or ought to be, within the personal knowledge Rules is limited to the
person whether a party or
of the latter: parties of the action
not
1. He shall not be permitted to present evidence on The order under this Rule
such facts is issued only upon It may be issued upon an
2. UNLESS otherwise allowed by the court for good motion with notice to the ex parte application
cause and to prevent a failure of justice adverse party
May be asked before May be asked only during
NOTE: This is similar to the provision on and/or during trial trial
unjustified failure of a party to avail of written Necessary to show good Not necessary to show
interrogatories under Sec. 6, Rule 25. cause good cause
Grounds for quashal:
1. Unreasonable,
oppressive,
Ground for quashal: No
irrelevant
good cause shown
2. Failure to advance
reasonable costs
of production
Consequence of
Disobedience constitutes
disobedience, see Rule 29,
contempt of court
Sec. 3
Procedure:
Court Order:
1. The court may:
a. Order any party to produce and permit the
inspection and copying or photographing,
(1) By or on behalf of the moving party
(2) Of any designated documents, papers,
books, accounts, letters, photographs,
objects or tangible things, not privileged,
which constitute or contain evidence
material to any matter involved in the
action
(3) And which are in his possession, custody
or control
69
b. Order any party to permit entry upon PHYSICAL AND MENTAL EXAMINATION OF PERSONS
designated land or other property in his (Rule 28)
possession or control
(1) For the purpose of inspecting, When available: In an action in which the mental or
measuring, surveying, or photographing, physical condition of a party is in controversy. (Rule 28,
property or any designated relevant Sec. 1)
object or operation thereon - NOTE: It is the mental and physical condition of a
PARTY not a WITNESS that is in controversy
2. Contents of the Order
a. Time, place, and manner of making the How Done:
inspection and taking copies and 1. Motion for examination is filed
photographs, and 2. Filed in the court in which the action is pending
b. Such terms and conditions as are just 3. Court may, in its discretion, order him to submit
to a physical or mental examination by a
physician
71
CONSEQUENCES OF REFUSAL TO COMPLY WITH
MODES OF DISCOVERY (Rule 29) The court on motion and notice may:
1. Strike out all or any part of any
Failure of
REFUSAL TO pleading of disobedient party
party to attend
COMPLY WITH 2. Dismiss the action or proceeding
SANCTIONS or serve
MODES OF or any part thereof
answers to
DISCOVERY 3. Enter a judgment by default
written
1. The court may, upon proper against disobedient party
interrogatories
application, compel a refusing 4. Order payment of reasonable
(Sec. 5)
deponent to answer (Sec. 1) expenses incurred by the other
a. If granted, and refusal to including attorney’s fees
answer is without substantial
justification, court may NOTE: Expenses and attorney’s fees are not to be imposed
require the refusing party to upon the Republic of the Philippines. (Rule 29, Sec. 6)
pay proponent the reasonable
Refusal to expenses incurred in
answer any obtaining the order
question b. If denied, and filed without
(Sec. 1 and 2) substantial justification, court
may require proponent to pay
refusing party the reasonable
expenses incurred in
obtaining the order
2. A refusal to answer after being
directed by court to do so may be
constituted as contempt of court
72
TRIAL (2) Diligent efforts had been exerted to
procure the evidence
DEFINITION
2. For illness of party or counsel (Rule 30, Sec. 4)
A trial is the judicial process of investigating and a. A motion for postponement stating the
determining the legal controversies, starting with the ground relied upon must be filed; and
production of evidence by the plaintiff and ending with b. The motion must be supported by an
his closing arguments [Acosta v. People (1962)]. affidavit or sworn certification showing:
(1) The presence of such party or counsel at
A hearing is a broader term. It is not confined to the trial the trial is indispensable; and
and presentation of the evidence because it actually (2) That the character of his illness is such as
embraces several stages in the litigation. It includes the to render his non-attendance excusable
pre-trial and the determination of granting or denying a
motion. [Trocio v. Labayo (1973)]
AGREED STATEMENT OF FACTS (Rule 30, Sec. 6)
NOTICE OF TRIAL (Rule 30, Sec. 1) The parties may agree in writing upon the facts involved
in the litigation and submit the case for judgment in the
Upon entry of a case in the trial calendar, the clerk shall facts agreed upon without the introduction of evidence
notify parties the date of its trial, ensuring receipt of the
notice at least 5 days before the trial date. If the parties agree only on some of the facts in issue, trial
shall be held as to the disputed facts in such order as the
GENERAL RULE: When an issue exists, trial is necessary. court shall prescribe.
Decision should not be made without trial.
Stipulation Of Facts in Stipulation Of Facts in
EXCEPTIONS: When there may be judgment without trial Civil Cases Criminal Cases
1. Judgment on the pleading (Rule 34) May be signed by the
Must be signed by both
2. Summary Judgment (Rule 35) counsel alone who has an
counsel and accused
3. Judgment on Compromise SPA
4. Judgment on Confession May be made verbally or Strict; it must always be in
5. Dismissal with Prejudice (Rule 17) in writing writing
6. Judgment under Rule on Summary Procedure,
and An agreed statement of facts is conclusive on the parties,
7. Stipulation of fact as well as on the court. Neither of the parties may
withdraw from the agreement, nor may the court ignore
the same. [McGuire v. Manufactures Life]
ADJOURNMENTS AND POSTPONEMENTS (Rule 30, Sec.
2)
ORDER OF TRIAL; REVERSAL OF ORDER (Rule 30, Sec.
GENERAL RULE: A court may adjourn a trial from day to 5)
day, and to any stated time, as the expeditious and
convenient transaction of business may require General Rule: Trial shall be limited to the issues stated in
the pre-trial order.
LIMITATION: The court has no power to adjourn a trial
for: Exceptions:
1. A period longer than one month for each 1. Provisions on separate trials under Rule 31, Sec.
adjournment; or 2
2. More than 3 months in all 2. When for special reasons the court directs
otherwise
EXCEPTION: Unless authorized in writing by the
Court Administrator, SC
General Order of Trial:
Postponement is not a matter of right. It is addressed to 1. Plaintiff’s evidence in chief
the sound discretion of the court. [Riano, citing Garces v 2. Defendant’s evidence in chief and evidence in
Valenzuela (1989)] support of his counterclaim, cross-claim and 3rd-
party complaint
3. 3rd-party defendant shall adduce evidence of his
REQUISITES OF MOTION TO POSTPONE TRIAL defense, counterclaim, cross-claim, and 4th party
complaint
1. For absence of evidence (Rule 30, Sec. 3) 4. 4th-party defendant shall adduce evidence, and so
a. Submission of affidavit showing that: forth
(1) The evidence is relevant; and 5. Parties against whom any counterclaim or cross-
claim has been pleaded shall adduce evidence in
73
support of their defense, in the order to be questions of law or facts in common with each other
prescribed by court (Active Woods Products Co. Inc. v. CA)
6. Parties may then respectively adduce rebutting
evidence only
a. Unless the court permits them to adduce SEVERANCE
evidence upon original case
7. Upon admission of evidence, case submitted for When proper: This contemplates a single action having a
decision number of claims, counterclaims, cross-claims, third-
a. Unless court directs parties to argue or to party complaints or issues which may be separately tried
submit respective memoranda or any further
pleading When separate trial of claims is conducted by the court
under this section, it may render separate judgments on
Reverse Order of Trial: each claim (see Sec. 5, Rule 36)
in this situation, the defendant presents evidence ahead of This provision permitting separate trials presupposes
the plaintiff that the claims involved are within the jurisdiction of the
court
When Proper: If the defendant in his answer relies upon - When one of the claims is not within its
an affirmative defense jurisdiction, the same should be dismissed, so
that it may be filed in the proper court
Where the answer of the defendant admitted the
obligation stated in the complaint, although
special defenses were pleaded, the plaintiff has DELEGATION OF RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE (Rule 30,
every right to insist that it was for the defendant Sec. 9)
to come forward with evidence to support his
special defenses (Yu v. Mapayo) General Rule: The judge of the court where the case is
pending shall personally receive the evidence to be
Ratio: Plaintiff need not have to present evidence since adduced by the parties.
judicial admissions do not require proof (Sec. 2, Rule 129)
Exception: The court may delegate the reception of
evidence to its clerk of court who is a member of the bar
CONSOLIDATION OR SEVERANCE OF HEARING OR in:
TRIAL (Rule 31) 1. Default hearings;
2. Ex parte hearings;
CONSOLIDATION 3. Cases where parties agree in writing.
When proper: When actions involving a common question However, the clerk of court has no power to rule on
of fact or law are pending before the court objections to any question/admission of exhibits.
Court action: The court may: Objections shall be resolved by the court upon submission
1. Order a joint hearing or trial of any or all matters of the clerk’s report and TSN within 10 days from
in issue in the actions termination of the hearing.
2. Order all actions consolidated
3. Such orders concerning proceedings therein as The rule requires that, where the reception of evidence is
may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay delegated to the clerk of court, he must also be a member
of the bar. Neither agreement by parties nor their
Purpose: To avoid multiplicity of suits, guard against acquiescence can justify its violation. [Umali-Paco v.
oppression or abuse, prevent delay, clear congested Quilala]
dockets, simplify the work of the trial court and save
unnecessary costs and expenses
TRIAL BY COMMISSIONERS (Rule 32)
Where a case has been partially tried before one judge,
the consolidation of the same with another related case CONCEPTS
pending before another judge who had no opportunity to
observe the demeanor of the witness during trial makes Commissioner - A person to whom a case pending in court
the consolidation not mandatory. [PCGG v. Sandiganbayan is referred, for him to take testimony, hear the parties and
(1992)] report thereon to the court, and upon whose report, if
confirmed, judgment is rendered
It has been held that the rules do not distinguish between
cases filed before the same branch or judge and those that General rule: Trial by commissioner depends largely upon
are pending in different branches or before different the discretion of the court
judges of the same court, in order that consolidation may
be proper, as long as the cases involve the resolution of Exception: In the following instances, appointment of
a commissioner is necessary:
74
1. Expropriation (Rule 67) a. UNLESS otherwise provided in the order of
2. Partition (Rule 69) reference
3. Settlement of Estate of a Deceased Person in case
of contested claims; and NOTE: Limitations on the powers of
4. Submission of Accounting by executors or commissioner are found in the Order of
administrators Reference.
Kinds of trial by commissioners Proceedings before the Commissioner (Rule 32, Sec. 5)
1. Reference by consent of both parties. 1. Upon receipt of the order of reference, the
2. Reference ordered on motion when: commissioner shall set a time and place for the
a. Trial of an issue of fact requires the first meeting of parties or their counsel
examination of a long account on either side 2. Notices shall be sent to parties or counsel
b. Taking of an account is necessary for the 3. Hearing is to be held within 10 days after date of
court’s information before judgment, or for order of reference
carrying judgment/order into effect. 4. If a party fails to appear, the commissioner may:
c. A question of fact, other than upon the (Sec. 6)
pleadings, arises in any stage of a case or for a. Proceed ex parte; or
carrying a judgment/order into effect. b. Adjourn the proceedings to a future date
giving notice to the absent party
REFERENCE BY CONSENT
REPORT OF COMMISSIONER (Rule 32, Sec. 9)
The court may order any or all of the issues in a case to be
referred to a commissioner by written consent of BOTH 1. When filed:
parties. (Rule 32, Sec. 1) a. Filed upon completion of the trial or hearing
or proceeding before the commissioner
Commissioners are to be: b. Filed with the court
1. Agreed upon by the parties; or
2. Appointed by the court 2. Contents:
a. Report in writing upon the matters
submitted to him by the order of reference
REFERENCE ORDERED ON MOTION b. When his powers are not specified or limited,
he shall set forth his findings of fact and
When proper: conclusions of law in his report
1. When trial of an issue of fact requires c. He shall attach all exhibits, affidavits,
examination of long account depositions, papers, and transcripts, if any, of
2. When taking of an account is necessary testimonial evidence presented before him
3. When question of fact, other than upon pleadings,
arises upon motion or otherwise, in any stage
(Rule 32, Sec. 2) NOTICE AND HEARING ON THE REPORT (Rule 32, Sec. 10
and 11)
Order of Reference: (Rule 32, Sec. 3)
1. When a reference is made, the clerk shall furnish Upon filing of the report of the commissioner:
the commissioner with a copy of the order of 1. Parties shall be notified by the clerk
reference 2. Parties shall be allowed 10 days within which to
2. Contents of the order: object to the findings of the report
a. It may specify or limit the powers of
commissioner NOTE: Objections to the report based upon
b. It may direct him to report only upon grounds which were available to the parties
particular issues; or to do or perform during the proceedings before the commissioner
particular acts; or to receive and report shall not be considered by the court UNLESS they
evidence only were made before the commissioner
c. It may fix the date for beginning and closing
the hearings and for the filing of his report Hearing on the Report:
1. When made: Upon expiration of the 10 day
Powers of Commissioner: period in Sec. 10
1. Exercise power to regulate the proceeding before 2. The report shall be then set forth in hearing
him 3. After the hearing, the court shall issue an order,
2. Do all acts and take all measures necessary or either:
proper for the efficient performance of his duties a. Adopting, modifying, or rejecting the report
3. Swear witnesses in whole or in part
4. Issue subpoena and subpoenas duces tecum b. Or recommitting it with instructions
5. Rule upon the admissibility of evidence
75
c. Or requiring the parties to present further
evidence before the commissioner or the
court
76
DEMURRER TO EVIDENCE render judgment on the
basis of the evidence
CONCEPTS: submitted by the plaintiff.
[Radiowealth Finance v. Del
Definition - A species of MTD that may be invoked based Rosario (2000)]
on insufficiency of evidence (i.e. upon the facts and the An interlocutory order and
law the plaintiff has shown no right to relief). [Rule 33, not appealable. However, it
Sec. 1] Equivalent to judgment (i.e. may be the subject of a
based on the merits of the petition for certiorari for
It is invoked after the plaintiff has presented all the evidence presented so far) GAD under Rule 65
evidence available to him [Katigbak v. Sandiganbayan
(2003)]
Judgment on Demurrer to Evidence – It is a judgment
rendered by the court dismissing a case upon motion of
defendant, made after plaintiff has rested his case, on the WAIVER OF RIGHT TO PRESENT EVIDENCE
ground that upon the facts presented and the law on the
matter, plaintiff has not shown any right to relief. If the order granting the demurrer is reversed on appeal,
the defendant loses his right to present evidence. [Rule
Distinctions 33, Sec .1; Republic v. Tuvera (2007)]
78
JUDGMENTS AND
case. A judgment is “on the merits” when it
amounts to a legal declaration of the respective
rights and duties of the parties, based upon the
FINAL ORDERS 4.
disclosed facts
Definition - The final ruling by a court of competent 5. JUDGMENT NUNC PRO TUNC - Literally, “now for
jurisdiction regarding the rights and obligations of the then”. It is a judgment intended to enter into the
parties or other matters submitted to it in an record the acts which had already been done, but
action/proceeding [Macahilig v. Heirs of Magalit (2000)] which do not appear in the records. [Lichauco v.
Tan Pho (1923)]
Requisites of a Valid Judgmen (Rule 36, Sec. 1; Art. VIII,
Sec. 14, 1987 Constitution) 6. JUDGMENT SIN PERJUICIO - It may refer to a
1. Court/tribunal must be with authority to hear dismissal of a case without prejudice to it being
and determine the matter before it; re-filed.
2. Court must have jurisdiction over the parties and
the subject matter; 7. CONDITIONAL JUDGMENT - It is one the
3. Parties must have been given an opportunity to effectivity of which depends upon the occurrence
adduce evidence in their behalf; or non-occurrence of an event. Such a judgment
4. Evidence must have been considered by the is generally void because of the absence of a
tribunal in deciding the case; [Acosta v. COMELEC disposition [Cu-Unjieng v. Mabalacat Sugar Co.
(1998)] (1940)]
5. Judgment must be in writing, personally and
directly prepared by the judge. A verbal judgment 8. SEVERAL JUDGMENT - It is one rendered by a
is, under the law, ineffective. [Corpus v. court against one or more defendants and not
Sandiganbayan (2004)] against all of them, leaving the action to proceed
6. Judgment must state clearly the facts and the law against the others. [Rule 36, Sec. 4] It is proper
upon which the decision is based, signed by the when the liability of each party is clearly separate
judge and filed with the clerk of court. [Rule 35, and distinct from his co-parties such that the
Sec. 1] claims against each of them could have been the
subject of separate suits, and the judgment for or
Kinds of Judgment: against one of them will not necessarily affect the
other.
1. JUDGMENT ON COMPROMISE - It is one
conferred on the basis of a compromise 9. SEPARATE JUDGMENT - It is one rendered
agreement entered into between the parties. It is disposing of a claim among several others
immediately executory in the absence of a motion presented in a case, after a determination of the
to set aside on the ground of FAME. issues material to a particular claim and all
counterclaims arising out of the transaction or
2. JUDGMENT UPON CONFESSION - It is one occurrence that is the subject matter of said
rendered by the court when a party expressly claim. [Rule 36, Sec. 5] It is proper when more
agrees to the other party’s claim or acknowledges than one claim for relief is presented in an action
the validity of the claim against him. for the determination as to the issues material to
the claim has been made.
a. JUDGMENT BY COGNOVIT ACTIONEM – After
service, the defendant, instead of entering a 10. MEMORANDUM DECISION - A decision of the
plea, acknowledged and confessed that the appellate court which adopts the findings and
plaintiff’s cause of action was just and conclusions of the TC.
rightful. a. A judgment is considered rendered upon the
filing of the signed decision.
b. JUDGMENT BY CONFESSION RELICTA b. This includes an amended decision because
VERIFICATIONE – After pleading and before an amended decision is a distinct and
trial, the defendant both: (a) confessed the separate judgment and must follow the
plaintiff’s cause of action and (b) withdrew established procedural rule.
his plea or other allegations, whereupon
judgment was entered against him without
proceeding to trial.
Basis: The fallo is the final order. The opinion in the body
is merely a statement ordering nothing [Poland Industrial
Limited v. National Development Company (2005)]
80
JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS SUMMARY JUDGMENTS
Judgment on the Pleadings is a judgment rendered by the Summary Judgment is a judgment rendered by a court
court if the answer fails to tender an issue, or otherwise without trial if it is clear that there exists NO GENUINE
admits the material allegations of the adverse party’s ISSUE or controversy as to any material fact, EXCEPT as to
pleading. It is rendered without a trial, or even without a the amount of damages
pre-trial
Genuine Issue - an issue of fact which calls for the
It has been held that a motion for a judgment on the presentation of evidence as distinguished from an issue,
pleadings, were the answer admits all material which is a sham, fictitious, contrived, and patently
averments, is one that may be considered ex parte unsubstantial so as not to constitute a genuine issue for
because upon the particular facts thus presented and laid trial
down before the court, the plaintiff is entitled to a
judgment (Dino v. Valencia), or motu proprio under Rule PROCEDURE (Rule 35, Sec. 3)
18(2g) (Luzon Dev. Bank v. Conquilla)
1. Movant files a motion for summary judgment
Grounds for Judgment on the Pleadings (Rule 34, Sec. 1) with supporting affidavits, depositions or
1. The answer fails to tender an issue because of: admission
a. General denial of the material allegations of 2. Service to the adverse party at least 10 days the
the complaint; hearing
b. Insufficient denial of the material allegations 3. Adverse party may serve opposing affidavits,
of the complaint; OR depositions or admissions at least 3 days before
2. The answer admits material allegations of the the hearing
adverse party’s pleading 4. Hearing – Court shall determine if a genuine issue
as to any material fact exists and if the movant is
Judgment on the Pleadings is NOT proper in actions for: entitled to a summary judgment as a matter of
1. Declaration of Nullity of Marriage law
2. Annulment of marriage; and 5. Court renders summary judgment
3. Legal Separation
4. Unliquidated damages; claims for such damages NOTE: Damages must still be proven even if not
must be alleged and proved denied.
5. Admission refers only to allegations of fact and
not conclusions of law Bases for Summary Judgment:
6. Insufficiency of facts; proper remedy is 1. Affidavits made on personal knowledge;
amendment 2. Depositions of the adverse or a 3rd party; (Rule
23)
NOTE: If the complaint states no cause of action, a motion 3. Admissions of the adverse party; (Rule 26)
to dismiss should be filed and not a motion for judgment 4. Answers to interrogatories. (Rule 25)
on the pleadings.
WHO MAY FILE
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
An extension of the period may be set by the SC upon Date of Finality: Date of finality is the date of entry.
request by the judge concerned on account of heavy
caseload or by other reasonable excuse [Arap v Mustafa Contents of the Records in the Book of Entries:
(2002)] 1. Dispositive part of the judgment or final order
2. Signed by the clerk with a certification that such
judgment or final order has become final and
executory.
AMENDMENTS TO JUDGMENT
Exceptions:
1. Clerical errors
2. Nunc Pro Tunc entries
3. Void judgments - Final judgment can be annulled
on the ground of fraud or lack of jurisdiction or
contrary to law (Panlilio v. Garcia)
4. Whenever circumstances transpire after finality
of the decision making its execution unjust and
inequitable:
a. Cases where, because of supervening events,
it becomes imperative, in the higher interest
of justice, to direct its modification in order
83
to harmonize the disposition with the
prevailing circumstances (Seavan Carrier Inc.
v. GTI Sportswear Corp.)
b. Whenever it is necessary to accomplish the
aims of justice (Pascual v. Tan)
Amended/clarified
Supplemental decision
judgment
An entirely new decision Does not take the place of
and supersedes the original or extinguish the original
judgment judgment
Court makes a thorough
study of the original
judgment and renders the
Serves to add to the
amended and clarified
original judgment
judgment only after
considering all the factual
and legal issues
84
POST-JUDGMENT The motions are filed with the court which rendered the
questioned judgment or final order.
REMEDIES The period for appeal is within 15 days after notice to the
appellant of the judgment or final order appealed from.
The 15-day period is deemed to commence upon receipt
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND by the counsel of record, which is considered notice to the
MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL parties. Service upon the parties themselves is prohibited
and is not considered as official receipt of judgment.
REMEDIES BEFORE FINALITY OF JUDGMENT
1. Motion for reconsideration Effect of Filing – The filing of a timely motion interrupts
2. Motion for new trial the period to appeal.
3. Appeal
FORM AND CONTENTS (Rule 37, Sec. 2)
DEFINITION
Form:
A motion for reconsideration under Rule 37 is directed 1. The motion must comply with the provisions of
against a judgment or final order. It is not the motion for Rule 15 otherwise it will not be accepted for
reconsideration of interlocutory order, which often filing and/or will not suspend the running of the
precedes a petition for certiorari under Rule 65. It does reglementary period.
not apply to cases that fall under Summary Procedure. 2. It shall be made in writing, stating the ground or
grounds therefor
GROUNDS: (Rule 37, Sec. 1) 3. Written notice shall be served by movant on the
adverse party
Grounds for Motion for New Trial:
1. FAME – Fraud, accident, mistake, excusable NOTE: Non-compliance with this requirement
negligence would reduce the motion to a mere pro forma
a. Conditions: motion, which shall not toll the period for appeal.
(1) Which ordinary prudence could not have
guarded against; and Contents of a motion for new trial
(2) By reason of which such aggrieved party 1. If based on FAME, it shall be supported by an
has probably been impaired in his rights affidavit of merits
NOTE: Fraud must be extrinsic fraud which NOTE: An affidavit of merits is one which recites
means any fraudulent scheme executed by the the nature and character of FAME on which the
prevailing party outside of the trial against the motion is based and stating the movant’s good
losing party who because of such fraud is and substantial cause of action or defense and the
prevented from presenting his side of the case. evidence he intends to present if granted
WHEN TO FILE: Court action – The court may: (Rule 37, Sec. 3)
1. Set aside the judgment or final order and grant a
An aggrieved party may file a motion for new trial or new trial; or upon such terms as may be just
reconsideration within the period for taking an appeal. 2. Deny the motion
85
3. Amend such judgment or final order accordingly motion for reconsideration but to the period
if: within which to appeal from the judgment itself.
a. The court finds that excessive damages have
been awarded or that; or Filing of a proper motion for new trial interrupts the
b. That the judgment or final order is contrary running of the period of appeal which begins to run again
to the evidence or law from receipt of the notice of the movant of the order
denying his motion (fresh 15 day period) (Phil.
Resolution (Rule 37, Sec. 4) – he motion shall be resolved Commercial and Industrial Bank v. Ortiz)
within 30 days from submission
Remedies if Motion is DENIED:
The 30-day period to resolve the motion is held to be 1. To appeal from the judgment or final order itself
mandatory [Gonzales v. Bantolo (2006)] 2. The order denying the motion may itself be
assailed by a petition for certiorari under Rule 65
GRANT OF THE MOTION; EFFECT 3. Rule 37, Sec. 9 says that an order denying a
motion for new trial or reconsideration is NOT
Grant of motion for reconsideration - The court may appealable
amend the judgment or final order accordingly. The a. NOTE HOWEVER: AM 07-7-12 amended Sec.
amended judgment is in the nature of a new judgment, 1 of Rule 41 by deleting “An order denying a
which supersedes the original judgment. motion for new trial or reconsideration”
from the non-appealable orders.
Grant of motion for new trial - The original judgment shall
be vacated, and the action shall stand for trial de novo.
The recorded evidence upon the former trial shall be used MOTION FOR MOTION FOR
at the new trial without retaking them (if they are NEW TRIAL RECONSIDERATION
material and competent). Grounds: Grounds:
1. Fraud, accident, 1. Damages awarded
Partial grant – Rule 37, Sec. 7 allows the court to order a mistake, or are excessive
new trial or grant reconsideration as to such issues if excusable 2. That evidence is
severable without interfering with the judgment or final negligence insufficient to
order upon the rest. 2. Newly discovered justify the
evidence decision or final
Note the order
REMEDY WHEN MOTION IS DENIED; FRESH 15-DAY qualifications 3. That decision or
RULE of each final order is
contrary to law
Effect of Denial of Motion – The judgment or final order Second motion from the
shall stand as is Second motion may be same party is prohibited.
allowed so long as based The prohibition applies
Single-Motion Rule (Rule 37, Sec. 5) – A party shall not be on grounds not existing or only to final orders or
allowed to file a 2nd motion for reconsideration. available at the time the judgments, hence it is
- Follow the Omnibus Motion Rule first motion was made allowed in interlocutory
orders
NOTE: While a 2nd motion for reconsideration is not If the court finds that
allowed, a second motion for new trial is authorized If a new trial is granted, excessive damages have
- However, it must be based on a ground not original judgment or final been awarded or that the
existing nor available when the 1st motion was order is vacated. judgment or final order is
made within the period allowed but excluding the The case stands for trial contrary to the evidence or
time during which the first motion had been de novo and will be tried law, it may amend such
pending. anew judgment or final order
accordingly
Fresh 15-Day Rule: The aggrieved party has a “fresh Available even on appeal Available against the
period” of 15 DAYS within which to file his appeal. but only on the ground of judgments or final orders
newly discovered or both the trial and
If the motion is denied, the movant has a “fresh period” of evidence appellate courts
15 days from receipt or notice of the order denying the Both are prohibited motions under Summary Procedure
motion for new trial or motion for reconsideration within
which to file an appeal. (Neypes v. CA, 2005)
NOTES:
1. This fresh period becomes significant only when
a party opts to file a motion for new trial or
reconsideration
2. This rule does not refer to the period within
which to appeal from the order denying the
86
APPEALS IN GENERAL nothing more to be leaves something more
done but to enforce to be decided upon.
NATURE OF APPEAL execution
Not appealable except
1. Not a natural right nor a part of due process Appealable through a petition for
2. It is merely a statutory right, and may be certiorari under Rule 65
exercised only in the manner and in accordance Must clearly and
with provisions of the law. It must comply with distinctly state the law No need to comply with
the requirements; failing to do so, the right to and the facts on which such a requirement
appeal is lost it is based
3. Once granted, appeals become part of due
process and should be liberally applied in favor An interlocutory order is one that does not finally dispose
of the right to appeal of the case, and does not end the court's task of
adjudicating the parties’ contentions and determining
their rights and liabilities as regards each other, but
JUDGMENTS AND FINAL ORDERS SUBJECT TO obviously indicates that other things remain to be done.
APPEAL; MATTERS NOT APPEALABLE [BPI v. Lee (2012)]
However, issues which are inferred from or necessarily The fresh period rule shall apply to:
connected with the issue properly raised and pleaded 1. Rule 40 governing appeals from the Municipal
may be resolved by the appellate court. [Espina v. CA Trial Courts to the Regional Trial Courts;
(1992)] 2. Rule 42 on petitions for review from the Regional
Trial Courts to the Court of Appeals;
3. Rule 43 on appeals from quasi-judicial agencies
PERIOD OF APPEAL to the Court of Appeals; and
4. Rule 45 governing appeals by certiorari to the
EFFECT OF Supreme Court. The new rule aims to regiment or
PERIOD TO APPEAL EXTENSIONS
MR or MNT make the appeal period uniform, to be counted
MTC to RTC from receipt of the order denying the motion for
By notice of appeal; new trial, motion for reconsideration (whether
Interrupts
within 15 days from No extensions full or partial) or any final order or resolution.
period to
notice of judgment or allowed [Neypes v. CA, (2005)]
appeal
final order
By record of appeal; Being procedural in nature, Neypes is deemed to be
within 30 days from applicable to actions pending and undetermined at
notice of judgment or the time of its effectivity and is thus retroactive in
final order that sense and to that extent. [First Aqua Sugar v. BPI
RTC to CA (2007)]
By notice of appeal;
Interrupts
Within 15 days from No extensions
period to PERFECTION OF APPEAL
notice of judgment or allowed
appeal
final order
By record of appeal; Perfection of an appeal in the manner and within the
within 30 days from period laid down by law is mandatory and jurisdictional.
notice of judgment or [Balgami v. CA (2004)]
final order
MTC to RTC to CA Effect of Failure to Perfect Appeal
The CA may 1. Defeats a party’s right to appeal.
grant a 15 day 2. Precludes appellate court from acquiring
extension. jurisdiction.
No further
15 days from notice of extension shall Fresh period
the judgment or final be granted to appeal
order OR from denial except for the from denial
of MR or MNT most MR or MNT
compelling
reasons and in
no case longer
than 15 days.
88
APPEAL FROM MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTS b. In such other cases where multiple appeals
TO THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURTS (RULE 40) are allowed
2. Form and contents of the record on appeal: (Rule
OUTLINE OF PROCEDURE (Rule 40, Sec. 7) 41, Sec. 6)
a. Within 15 days from perfection of appeal,
clerk of court or the branch clerk of the lower
Appeal decision of MTC by filing notice of appeal and pay
within 15 days from receipt of judgment
court shall transmit to the RTC:
(1) Original record or record on appeal
(2) Together with transcripts and exhibits
15 days from perfection of appeal, b. Clerk shall make a certification that the
MTC clerk transmits record to RTC documents are complete
c. Clerk shall also furnish the parties a copy of
his letter of transmittal of the records to the
Notice to parties that an appeal is being taken appellate court
from the decision of the MTC 3. Copy is served on the adverse party
4. Payment in full of docket fees and other lawful
fees
Within 15 days from notice of appeal:
1. Appellant submits memorandum to the RTC
2. Appellee files his own memorandum 15 days from PERFECTION OF APPEAL
receipt of appellant’s memorandum
Since appeals from inferior courts may now be either by
notice of appeal or record on appeal, the rules on the
Court acts on the appeal perfection and the effect thereof are the same. See Sec. 9,
Rule 41
If uncontested, Any party may appeal APPEAL FROM ORDERS DISMISSING THE CASE
judgment is entered in by filing a petition for WITHOUT TRIAL; LACK OF JURISDICTION (Rule 40,
the book of entries review with the CA
Sec. 8)
Two Scenarios:
WHERE APPEAL IS TAKEN
1. If the MTC dismissed the case without trial on the
It is taken to the RTC exercising jurisdiction over the area merits, the RTC may:
to which the MTC pertains. (Rule 40, Sec. 1) a. AFFIRM, if the ground of dismissal is lack of
jurisdiction over the subject matter
WHEN TO APPEAL (Rule 40, Sec. 2) (1) If the RTC has jurisdiction, it shall try the
1. If by notice of appeal, within 15 days after notice case on the merits as if the case was
to appellant of judgment or final order appealed originally filed therein
from
2. If record of appeal is required, within 30 days b. REVERSE, in which case, it shall remand the
from notice of judgment or final order case for further proceedings
3. Period of appeal shall be interrupted by a timely
motion for new trial or reconsideration 2. If the case was tried on the merits by the MTC
without jurisdiction over the subject matter:
NOTE: The fresh 15 day period rule applies. a. The RTC shall NOT dismiss the case if it has
original jurisdiction
HOW TO APPEAL (Rule 40, Sec. 3) b. If it has original jurisdiction, the RTC shall
decide the case and admit amended
By Notice of Appeal pleadings or additional evidence
1. File a notice of appeal with the trial court that
rendered the judgment or final order appealed APPLICABILITY OF RULE 41 - The other provisions of
from Rule 41 shall apply to appeals provided for herein insofar
2. The notice of appeal must indicate the parties, as they are not inconsistent with or may serve to
the judgment or final order or part thereof supplement the provisions of this Rule.
appealed from; the material date showing
timeliness of appeal
3. A copy served on the adverse party; and
4. Payment in full of docket fees and other lawful
fees
By Record on Appeal
1. Record on appeal is required for the following
cases:
a. Special proceedings
89
APPEAL FROM THE REGIONAL TRIAL 3. In chronological order, copies of only such
COURTS (RULE 41) pleadings, petitions, motions, and all
interlocutory orders as are related to the
MODES OF APPEAL: There are three modes of appeal appealed judgment or final order
from judgments or final orders of the RTC: 4. For the proper understanding of the issue
involved
1. ORDINARY APPEAL or appeal by writ of error, 5. Together with such data as will show that the
where judgment was rendered in a civil or appeal was perfected on time
criminal action by the RTC in the exercise of its
original jurisdiction Approval of the Record on Appeal (Rule 41, Sec.
a. This mode of appeal, governed by Rule 41, is 7) – Upon filing of the record for approval and if
taken to the CA on questions of fact or mixed no objection is filed by the appellee within 5 days
questions of fact and law from receipt of a copy thereof, the trial court
may:
2. PETITION FOR REVIEW, where judgment was 1. Approve it as presented; or
rendered by the RTC in the exercise of its 2. Direct its amendment by the inclusion of any
appellate jurisdiction omitted matters which are deemed essential
a. This mode of appeal, covered by Rule 42, is
brought to the CA on question of fact, of law, Joint Record on Appeal (Rule 41, Sec. 8) – Where
or mixed questions of fact and law both parties are appellants, they may file a joint
record on appeal.
3. PETITION FOR REVIEW ON CERTIORARI, or
appeal by certiorari to the SC
a. This mode of appeal, provided for by Rule 45, PERIOD TO APPEAL (Rule 41, Sec. 2)
is brought to the SC from the decision of the 1. 15 days from notice of judgment or final order
RTC in the exercise of its original jurisdiction appealed from
and only on questions of law 2. 30 days from notice of judgment or final order
where a record on appeal is required
HOW ORDINARY APPEAL VIA RULE 41 IS MADE: 3. 48 hours from notice of judgment or final order
appealed from in habeas corpus cases
Appeal via Rule 41 presupposes that:
1. The RTC rendered the judgment or final order in Reckoning point of reglementary period: Period for filing
the civil action or special proceeding in the the appeal should be counted from the date when the
exercise of its ORIGINAL jurisdiction; and party’s counsel received a copy of the judgment or final
2. That the appeal is taken to the CA on: order
a. Questions of fact or
b. Mixed questions of fact and law When a party is represented by a counsel, service
of process must be made on counsel, not on party
Notice of Appeal – Filed with the court which rendered the (Fajardo v. CA)
judgment or final order appealed from. A copy is served
on the adverse party. (Rule 41, Sec. 5) Effect of Motions for New Trial and Reconsideration –
Originally, the period to appeal is interrupted by a timely
Contents of the Notice of Appeal: motion for new trial and reconsideration. However, with
1. Parties to the appeal the Neypes doctrine, a party has a fresh 15-day period
2. Judgment or final order or part thereof from a denial of the motion to perfect an appeal.
appealed from
3. The court to which the appeal is being taken; Extension of Period to Appeal
and
4. The material dates showing the timeliness of Period to appeal may be extended but such extension is
the appeal addressed to the sound discretion of the court (Socco v.
Garcia)
Record on Appeal – Done in special proceedings and other
cases where multiple or separate appeals are allowed. The mere filing and pendency of motion for extension to
This is filed and served in the same manner as notice of perfect appeal does not suspend the running of the
appeal. reglementary period (Bello et al., v. Fernandez)
90
2. Follow the Efficient Use of Paper Rule, one 1. If appeal is by notice of appeal – it is deemed
original properly marked and 2 copies with perfected as to him upon the filing of the notice of
annexes appeal in due time
3. Attach proof of service to adverse party 2. If appeal is by record on appeal – it is perfected
as to him with respect to the subject matter
Grounds for dismissal with respect to appellant’s thereof, upon approval of the record on appeal
brief: filed in due time
1. Failure to file brief on time
2. Failure to make specific assignment of errors Effect of Perfected Appeal
in his brief 1. In appeals by notice of appeal:
a. Court loses jurisdiction over the case upon
Contents: perfection of appeal filed in due time and
1. Subject index expiration of the time to appeal of the other
2. Assignment of Errors parties
3. Statement of the Case b. NOTE: This rule applies individually and to
4. Statement of Facts each of the parties since the timeliness of
5. Statement of Issues their recourse for appellate remedy depends
6. Arguments on when they respectively received a copy of
7. Relief the judgment or final order
8. Copy of judgment or final order appealed
from 2. In appeals by record on appeal:
a. Court loses jurisdiction only over the subject
Appellee’s Brief: matter thereof upon approval of the records
1. Filed within 45 days from receipt of appellant’s on appeal filed in due time and the expiration
brief of the time to appeal of the other parties
2. Manner of filing is similar to that in appellant’s b. NOTE: The effect is limited to the subject
brief matter only. Jurisdiction over the case is still
with the trial court
Contents:
1. Subject index Residual Powers/Jurisdiction of the RTC – After losing
2. Statement of Facts and Counter-Statement of jurisdiction but prior to the transmittal of the original
Facts record on appeal, the RTC may:
3. Arguments 1. Order execution pending appeal under Rule 39,
Sec. 2 (motion for execution was filed before
Appellant’s Reply Brief expiration of the period to appeal)
1. Filed within 20 days from receipt of appellee’s 2. To issue orders for preservation of the rights of
brief the parties which do not involve matters litigated
2. This is not mandatory as it is optional on the part by appeal
of the appellant 3. To approve compromise prior to the transmittal
of the record
Extension of Time for Filing Briefs: 4. Permit appeal by an indigent
1. General rule: Not allowed 5. Allow withdrawal of the appeal
2. Exception: For good reasons and only if motion
for extension is filed before expiration of time The concept of residual jurisdiction of the trial court is
sought to be extended available at a stage in which the court is normally deemed
to have lost jurisdiction over the case or the subject
matter involved in the appeal. There is no residual
PERFECTION OF APPEAL jurisdiction to speak of where no appeal or petition has
even been filed (Fernandez v. CA).
Payment of Docket Fees (Rule 41, Sec. 4)
Within the period for taking an appeal, the appellant shall Duty of Clerk Upon Perfection of Appeal (Rule 41, Sec. 10)
pay to the clerk of the court which rendered the judgment Within 30 days after perfection of all appeals, the RTC
or final order appealed from, the full amount of the clerk shall:
appellate court docket and other lawful fees. Proof of 1. Verify completeness of original record or record
payment of said fees shall be transmitted to the appellate on appeal and make certification as to its
court together with the original record or the record on correctness
appeal. 2. Verify completeness of records that will be
transmitted to appellate court
Payment of docket fees in full is mandatory and is a 3. If found to be incomplete:
condition sine qua non for the perfection of an appeal. a. Take such measures as may be required to
complete records
Perfection of Appeal (Rule 41, Sec. 9) b. If efforts to complete records fail:
91
(1) Indicate in his letter of transmittal the PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE
exhibits or transcripts not included REGIONAL TRIAL COURTS TO THE COURT OF
(2) Reasons for their transmittal
(3) Steps taken or that could be taken to
APPEALS (RULE 42)
have them available
4. Transmit the records to appellate court and Under this mode of appeal, it is NOT a matter of right but
furnish the parties with copies of his letter of is a matter of DISCRETION on the part of the CA on
transmittal whether or not to entertain the appeal.
DISMISSAL OF APPEAL (Rule 41, Sec. 13) Appeal via Rule 42 is proper when one appeals from a
decision of the RTC in the exercise of its APPELLATE
When can the RTC dismiss the appeal? jurisdiction.
1. Prior to transmittal of original record to appellate
court; or Appeal under Rule 42 may be on either questions of fact
2. Prior to transmittal of record on appeal to the or of law or on mixed questions of both
appellate court
How done: By the court, motu proprio, or on motion to HOW APPEAL IS TAKEN; PERIOD OF APPEAL (Rule 42,
dismiss appeal by a party Sec. 1)
ACTION ON PETITION (Rule 42, Sec. 4) General Rule: Perfected appeal stays the challenged
judgment or final order
The CA may:
1. Require respondent to file a comment on the Exceptions:
petition not a motion to dismiss within 10 days 1. Unless the CA, law, or Rules, provide
from notice; or otherwise
2. Also in civil cases decided under the Rule on
2. Dismiss the petition if it finds the same to be: Summary Procedure; Stay of judgment is not
a. Patently without merit applicable here since these are immediately
b. Prosecuted manifestly for delay; or executory
c. The questions raised therein are too
unsubstantial to require consideration SUBMISSION OF DECISION (Rule 42, Sec. 9)
REMEMBER: Under this Rule, appeal is discretionary on If the petition is given due course
the CA which may give its due course only when the 1. Case may be set for oral argument, or
petition shows prima facie that the lower court has 2. The parties may be required to submit
committed error. memoranda within 15 days from notice
3. Case shall be deemed submitted for decision
COMMENT BY RESPONDENT (Rule 42, Sec. 5) upon filing of last pleading or memoranda
Form of Comment:
1. An original is filed, properly marked, together
with 2 copies with their annexes (Efficient Use of
Paper Rule)
2. Accompanied by certified true copies of such
material portions of the record referred to
therein
3. Together with other supporting papers
4. Copy of the comment served on petitioner
Within 15 days from notice that petition has been given APPEAL FROM JUDGMENTS OR FINAL ORDERS OF
due course, the CA may: THE OMBUDSMAN
1. Require court or agency concerned to transmit
original or legible certified true copy of entire The following decisions are unappealable:
record of proceeding under review 1. In administrative cases where respondent is
2. Require or permit subsequent correction or absolved of the charge
addition to record 2. In case of conviction, where penalty imposed is
public censure or reprimand, or suspension of
not more than one month or a fine equivalent to
EFFECT OF APPEAL (Rule 43, Sec. 12) one month salary (AO 7, Rule III, Sec. 7)
General Rule: Appeal shall not stay the award, judgment, Jurisdiction of the CA
final order or resolution sought to be reviewed 1. CA has jurisdiction over orders, directives, and
decisions of the Office of Ombudsman in
Exception: When the CA shall direct otherwise upon such administrative disciplinary cases only
terms as it may deem just 2. It cannot review orders, directives, decisions in
criminal and non-administrative cases
96
OUTLINE OF PROCEDURE facts of trial court, as affirmed on appeal by the CA, are
conclusive on the court (Boston Bank of the Philippines v.
RTC, Sandiganbayan, CTA en banc, or CA renders a decision Manalo)
Appellant serves copies of petition on adverse parties To appeal under Rule 45, RTC must render judgment in
And to the lower court, the exercise of its original jurisdiction
And pay the corresponding docket fees
If the RTC is in exercise of its appellate jurisdiction,
proper remedy is to appeal to the CA via Rule 42 even if
SC may dismiss the petition or require appellee to comment only questions of law are raised
The Neypes doctrine is also applicable in Rule 45. Some indications of the character of reasons which will be
considered:
Extension of Period: 30 days upon 1. When the court a quo has decided the question of
1. Motion duly filed and served; and substance, not theretofore determined by the SC,
2. Payment of docket and lawful fees and deposit or has decided it in a way probably not in accord
for costs with law or with the applicable provisions of the
3. And for justifiable reasons SC; or
2. Court a quo has so far departed from accepted
and usual course of judicial proceedings, or so far
FORM OF PETITION sanctioned such departure by a lower court, as to
1. The petition must be VERIFIED call for an exercise of power of supervision
2. Following the Efficient Use of Paper Rule:
a. One original, properly marked, and 4 copies
b. If the case is referred to En Banc, 10 ELEVATION OF RECORDS: (Rule 45, Sec. 8)
additional copies is filed
3. Payment of docket and other lawful fees and If the petition is given due course, the Supreme Court
deposit of P500 for costs is made with the SC may require the elevation of the complete record of the
Clerk at the time of filing case or specified parts thereof within fifteen (15) days
4. Proof of service of the petition to the lower court from notice
and adverse party are attached
Other Grounds
1. By agreement of the parties (i.e. amicable
settlement)
2. Where appealed case has become moot or
academic
3. Where appeal is frivolous or dilatory
99
COMPARATIVE TABLE ON THE MODES OF APPEAL
WHEN PROPER
RULE 40 RULE 41 RULE 42 RULE 43 RULE 45
ORDINARY APPEAL PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Matter of Right; Filed with the court of origin Discretionary; No records are elevated unless the court decrees it
All records are elevated from court of origin Filed with the appellate court
Appeal from a decision of the Appeals to the SC from a
Appeal from a judgment or final
RTC in the exercise of its original judgment or final order or
order of a MTC
jurisdiction resolution of the CA,
Sandiganbayan, CTA en banc,
Appeals from awards, judgments, RTC (original jurisdiction) or
Appeal from a decision of the final orders or resolution of or such other courts as may be
RTC rendered in the exercise of authorized by any quasi-judicial authorized by law
Rule 41 provisions shall apply to Rule 40 if not consistent with Rule its appellate jurisdiction agency in the exercise of its Decisions, final orders, or
40 provisions quasi-judicial functions resolutions of the CA in any case,
regardless of the nature of the
action or proceedings involved,
may be appealed to the SC by
filing a petition for review,
WHERE TO FILE
RULE 40 RULE 41 RULE 42 RULE 43 RULE 45
Filed with the MTC Filed with the RTC Filed with the CA Filed with the CA Filed with the SC
Appeal to the RTC Appeal to the CA Appeal to the CA Appeal to the CA Appeal to the SC
Questions of fact or mixed Questions of fact, Questions of
Questions of fact or mixed Questions of fact, Questions of
questions of fact and law law, or Mixed questions of fact Only Questions of Law
questions of fact and law law, or Mixed questions of both
and law
TIME FOR FILING
RULE 40 RULE 41 RULE 42 RULE 43 RULE 45
Within 15 days from:
Within 15 days from:
1. Notice of award,
1. Notice of judgment,
judgment, final order,
BY NOTICE OF APPEAL Within 15 days from notice of final order, or
or resolution OR
Within 15 days after notice of judgment or final order decision, or resolution appealed
2. Date of publication, if
Within 15 days from notice of from, or
publication is required
BY RECORD ON APPEAL denial of petitioner’s motion for 2. Notice of denial of
by law for its effectivity,
Within 30 days from notice of judgment or final order by filing a new trial or reconsideration motion for new trial or
OR
notice of appeal and a record on appeal reconsideration filed in
3. Denial of petitioner’s
due time after notice of
MNT or MR (only one
judgment
MR allowed)
100
RELIEF FROM JUDGMENTS, ORDERS, AND WHEN PROPER
OTHER PROCEEDINGS (RULE 38)
Rule 38 can be availed of once the judgment has become
CONCEPT final and executory.
Remedies AFTER finality of judgment The relief provided for by Rule 38 is of equitable
1. Petition for relief (Rule 38) character and is only allowed in exceptional cases, that is
2. Action to Annul Judgment (Rule 47) where there is no other available or adequate remedy. A
3. Collateral Attack of a Judgment that is Void on its petition for relief is not regarded with favor and judgment
Face will not be disturbed where the party complaining has or
by his exercising proper diligence would have had an
A petition for relief from judgment together with a motion adequate remedy at law, as where petitioner could have
for new trial and a motion for reconsideration are proceeded by appeal to vacate or modify the default
remedies available only to parties in the proceedings judgment. [Manila Electric v. CA (1990)]
where the assailed judgment is rendered. In fact, it has
been held that a person who was never a party to the Under Sec. 1, it is also available when “any other
case, or even summoned to appear therein, cannot avail of proceeding is thereafter taken against the petitioner in
a petition for relief from judgment (Alaban v. Cam) any court through FAME”
NOTE: This is not applicable to the SC since it is not a trier Thus, it was held that a petition for relief is also applicable
of facts. to a proceeding taken after entry of judgment or final
order such as an order of execution (Cayetano v.
RULE 37 v. RULE 38 Ceguerra) or an order dismissing an appeal (Medran v.
CA)
RULE 37 RULE 38
Available BEFORE Available AFTER judgment
WHERE FILED
judgment becomes final has become final and
and executory executory
Rule 38 is not an independent action but a continuation of
Applies to judgments, final
Applies to judgments or the old case. Hence, it is filed with the same court and
orders and other
final orders only same branch which decided the case.
proceedings
Grounds: (1) FAME and
(2) Newly discovered Ground: FAME
GROUNDS: (Rule 38, Sec. 1 and 2)
evidence
1. When judgment or final order is entered or any
Filed within 60 days from other proceeding is thereafter taken against
Filed within the time to knowledge of judgment petitioner through FAME
appeal and within 6 months from 2. When petitioner has been prevented from taking
entry of judgment an appeal by FAME
If denied, order denying a
If denied, order of denial
petition for relief is not
is not appealable; hence,
appealable; remedy is PERIOD FOR FILING: (Rule 38, Sec. 3)
remedy is appeal from
appropriate civil action 1. Within 60 days after petitioner learns of the
judgment
under Rule 65 judgment, final order, or other proceeding to be
Legal remedy Equitable remedy set aside; AND
Motion need not be 2. Not more than 6 months after such judgment or
Petition must be verified
verified final order was entered, or such proceeding was
taken
Rule 37 and Rule 38 are EXCLUSIVE remedies.
The two periods for the filing of a petition for relief are
A party who has filed a timely motion for new trial and/or not extendible and never interrupted. Both periods must
reconsideration cannot file a petition for relief after his be complied with. (Phil. Rabbit Bus Lines Inc. v. Ariaga)
motion has been denied.
Reckoning points:
A party who has filed a timely motion for new trial or 1. The 60-day period is reckoned from the time the
motion for reconsideration can no longer file a petition party acquired knowledge of the order, judgment
for relief from judgment after his motion has been denied. or proceeding. Not from the date he actually read
These remedies are mutually exclusive. It is only in the same (Perez v. Araneta)
appropriate cases where a party aggrieved by the 2. 6-months period is computed from the date of
judgment has not been able to file a motion for new trial entry of the order or judgment
or motion for reconsideration that a petition for relief can
be filed. (Francisco v. Puno, 1981)
FORM AND CONTENTS OF THE PETITION
101
1. The petition for relief must be verified ANNULMENT OF JUDGMENTS OR FINAL
2. The petition must be accompanied by an affidavit ORDERS AND RESOLUTIONS (RULE 47)
showing the FAME relied upon; and
3. The affidavit of merit accompanying the petition Annulment of Judgment is a remedy in law independent
must also show the facts constituting the of the case where the judgment sought to be annulled was
petitioner’s good and substantial cause of action rendered and may be availed of though the judgment has
or defense as the case may be been executed.
The absence of an affidavit of merits is a fatal defect and NATURE
warrant denial of the petition (Fernandez v. Tan Tiong
Tick) The purpose of such action is to have the final and
executory judgment set aside so that there will be a
However, it is not a fatal defect so long as the facts renewal of litigation.
required to be set out also appear in the verified petition
(Fabar Inc. v. Rodelas) Resorted to in cases where ordinary remedies of new
trial, appeal, petition for relief, or other appropriate
When Affidavit of Merit is not necessary: remedies are no longer available through no fault of
1. When there is lack of jurisdiction over the petitioner
defendant;
2. When there is lack of jurisdiction over the subject It is not a mode of appeal but an Independent Civil Action.
matter;
3. When judgment was taken by default;
4. When judgment was entered by mistake or was WHEN PROPER (Rule 47, Sec. 1)
obtained by fraud; or
5. Other similar cases. It is available when the petitioner failed to move for new
trial in, or appeal from, or file a petition for relief against,
or take other appropriate remedies assailing the
ORDER TO FILE ANSWER (Rule 38, Sec. 4) questioned judgment or final order or resolution through
no fault attributable to him
An order to answer shall issue only if petition is sufficient
in form and substance. The remedy may no longer be invoked where the party
has availed himself of the remedy of new trial, appeal,
If petition is sufficient in form and in substance, the court petition for relief, or other appropriate remedy and lost
shall issue an order requiring the adverse party to answer or where he has failed to avail himself of those remedies
within 15 days from receipt thereof. through his fault or negligence
NOTE: In a petition for annulment of judgment EFFECT OF JUDGMENT OF ANNULMENT (Rule 47, Sec.
based on lack of jurisdiction, petitioner must 7)
show an ABSOLUTE LACK of jurisdiction not
merely abuse of jurisdictional discretion. Effect of annulment based on lack of jurisdiction
1. The same shall be set aside and considered null
As to Evidence and void
1. When the ground invoked is extrinsic fraud, 2. Aggrieved party may refile the action in the
extraneous evidence is admitted proper court
2. However, when the ground is lack of jurisdiction, a. This may involve a different court of
only evidence found in the records of the case can competent jurisdiction
justify nullity of judgment b. But where the reason for such annulment
was because of lack of jurisdiction over
defendant, the action may be refilled in the
PERIOD FOR FILING (Rule 47, Sec. 3) same original court provided it has proper
jurisdiction and venue
LACK OF
EXTRINSIC FRAUD
JURISDICTION Effect of annulment based on extrinsic fraud
PERIOD 1. The same shall be set aside and considered null
4 years from Before it is barred by
OF and void
discovery of fraud laches or estoppel
FILING 2. On motion of the prevailing party on justifiable
grounds, he may be allowed to no longer refile
There must be a manifest showing with petition that it the action
was filed within the 4-yr period. a. The trial court which rendered the
questioned judgment shall be ordered to try
The rule does not fix the period to annul judgment based the case anew
on lack of jurisdiction but recognizes the principle of
estoppel as first laid down by Tijam v. Sibonghanoy. The prescriptive period for the refiling of the aforesaid
original action shall be deemed suspended from the filing
of said original action until the finality of the judgment of
FORM AND CONTENTS OF PETITION (Rule 47, Sec. 3) annulment. However, the prescriptive period shall not be
1. Verified petition, alleging therein: suspended where the extrinsic fraud is attributable to the
a. With particularity, the facts and the law plaintiff in the original action. (Rule 47, Sec. 8)
relied upon
b. Petitioner’s good and substantial cause of
action or defense
103
COLLATERAL ATTACK OF JUDGMENTS
ATTACKING A VOID JUDGMENT
104
EXECUTION, It can be noted that the Supreme Court made a hairline
SATISFACTION, AND distinction between finality of order for appeals and for
execution. It is submitted that upon court’s issuance of a
judgment touching upon the merits of a case, it is final for
EFFECT OF the purposes of an appeal, but NOT for execution.
Execution as a matter of right, TWO INSTANCES: Supervening Event Doctrine – A supervening event can be
1. No appeal has been perfected or period of appeal invoked for the modification or alteration of a final
has expired judgment. This refers to:
2. Appeal has been perfected and finally resolved 1. Facts which transpire after judgment has become
final and executory. Or
How Done: 2. New circumstances which developed after the
judgment has acquired finality
CASE HOW EXECUTION IS CARRIED 3. Matters which the parties were not aware of
If no appeal has Prevailing party applies by motion prior to or during the trial as they were not yet in
been perfected, or for a writ of execution which is existence at that time
the period of appeal granted by the judge since it is a 4. The supervening facts or circumstances must
has expired matter of right either bear a direct effect upon the matters
Prevailing party: already litigated and settled or create a
1. Files a motion in the court substantial change in the rights or relations of the
of origin, parties therein which render execution of the
2. Submitting certified true final judgment unjust or impossible (Lim v.
copies of the judgment or Jabalde)
final orders sought to be
enforced
3. Submitting the entry DISCRETIONARY EXECUTION (Rule 39, Sec. 2)
If appeal has been
thereof,
perfected and DISCRETIONARY EXECUTION AS A MATTER
4. With notice to adverse
finally resolved EXECUTION OF RIGHT
party
Appellate court may also direct the May issue before the lapse Period to appeal has
court of origin to issue the writ of of period to appeal, and already lapsed and no
execution: even during appeal appeal is perfected
1. Upon motion in the same Discretionary upon the Ministerial duty of the
case AND court court
2. When the interest of Upon showing of good Provided there are no
justice so requires reason for execution supervening events
General Rule: It is a matter of right on the part of the Under the Rule on Discretionary Execution (also called
winning party when the judgment or order becomes execution pending appeal), the court rendering the
executory. The court cannot refuse execution. judgment, if it still has jurisdiction, may exercise
discretion and order execution pending appeal.
106
It is the execution of a judgment or final order before it 3. Good reasons must be
attains finality. The court which rendered the decision can shown
grant an execution pending appeal if it still retains
jurisdiction over the case and is in possession of the 2. Execution of several, separate, or partial
records at the time of the filing of the motion; otherwise, judgments may also be executed under the same
the motion shall be acted upon by the appellate court. terms and conditions as execution pending
To be valid, there should be a good reason to justify the appeal.
execution of the judgment pending appeal, the same to be
stated in the order granting it. Requisites for Discretionary Execution:
1. There must be a motion filed by prevailing party
with notice to adverse party
Discretionary Execution is NOT applicable in the case of the 2. There must be a hearing of the motion for
Court of Appeals: discretionary execution
1. The Rule on Discretionary Execution 3. There must be good reasons to justify the
contemplates a situation where a judgment or discretionary execution
final order rendered in the exercise of its original 4. These good reasons must be stated in a special
jurisdiction and the prevailing party in said order after due hearing
decision seeks immediate execution during the
pendency of an appeal.
2. The CA has no authority to issue IMMEDIATE Examples of Good Reasons:
EXECUTION PENDING APPEAL OF ITS OWN 1. Where the goods subject of the judgment stand to
DECISIONS THEREIN. perish or deteriorate during the pendency of the
3. Discretionary execution is allowed pending appeal (Yasuda v. CA)
appeal of judgment or final order of the trial 2. The award of actual damages is for an amount
court upon good reasons to be stated in a special fixed and certain (Radio Communications Inc. v.
order. Lantin). But not an award for moral and
exemplary damages
A judgment of the CA cannot be executed pending appeal. 3. Insolvency of a defeated party (Hacienda Navarro
(Heirs of Justice JBL Reyes v. CA, 2000) v. Labrador)
4. The prevailing party is of advanced age and in a
precarious state of health and the obligation in
When Proper and How Done the judgment is non-transmissible, being for
support (De Leon v. Soriano)
1. Execution pending appeal – The duration of the 5. Where defendants were exhausting their income
court’s discretionary power to order execution and have no other property aside from proceeds
pending appeal depends on: of the property subject in litigation (Lao v.
a. Where the record on appeal is required, Mencias)
(1) The court loses jurisdiction only over the
subject matter thereof upon approval of
the record on appeal and expiration of The Supersedeas Bond
the time to appeal of the other party
Discretionary execution may be stayed upon approval by
b. Where no record on appeal is required, court the proper court of a sufficient supersedeas bond filed by
may issue writ of execution before perfection the party against whom it is directed.
of appeal 1. It is conditioned upon the performance of the
judgment or order allowed to be executed in case
c. If the court lost jurisdiction, the writ may be it shall be finally sustained in whole or in part
issued by the appellate court, as such: 2. Bond may be proceeded against on motion with
notice to surety
CASE HOW EXECUTION IS CARRIED
Prevailing party: General Rule: The filing of a supersedeas bond is
If the trial court still 1. Files a motion with sufficient to stay the enforcement of a discretionary
has jurisdiction over notice to the adverse execution.
the case and is still in party
possession of either 2. Motion is filed with the Exception: However, THE FILING OF SUPERSEDEAS
the original record or TRIAL court BOND does not entitle the judgment debtor to the
record on appeal 3. Good reasons must be suspension of execution as a MATTER OF RIGHT. Where
shown the needs of the prevailing party are URGENT, the Court
The prevailing party: can order immediate execution despite such
1. Files a motion with SUPERSEDEAS BOND. [Regalado]
If the trial court has
notice to adverse party
lost jurisdiction
2. Motion is filed with the If judgment is reversed totally or partially, or annulled –
APPELLATE COURT The trial court may, on motion, issue such orders of
107
restitution or reparation of damages as equity and justice HOW JUDGMENT IS EXECUTED
may warrant under the circumstances
EXECUTION BY MOTION OR BY INDEPENDENT
Remedy against Execution pending Appeal – The remedy is ACTION (Rule 39, Sec. 6)
certiorari by Rule 65. The appeal could not be an
adequate remedy for such premature execution. (Jaca v. Modes of Enforcement of Execution:
Davao Lumber Co.)
MODE WHEN ENFORCED
Within 5 years from date of entry of
By Motion
judgment
After the lapse of 5 years from date of
By
entry and before it is barred by statute
Independent
of limitations which is 10 years from
Action
date of entry (Art. 1144(3))
Manner of Execution
To deliver possession of
the same, describing it, to
If it be for delivery or
the party entitled thereto
possession of real or
personal property
Then to satisfy any costs,
damages, rents, or profits
108
covered by the judgment EXECUTION FOR JUDGMENTS OF MONEY
Out of the personal If the award is for payment of money, execution is
property of obligor enforced by: (Rule 39, Sec. 9)
1. Immediate payment on demand
In case of insufficiency, 2. Satisfaction by levy
then out of real property 3. Garnishment of debts and credits
SATISFACTION BY LEVY
109
placed under sheriff’s guards. Without valid levy having UP’s funds, being government funds, are not subject to
been made, any sale of the property thereafter is void. garnishment. Moreover, The execution of the monetary
judgment against the UP was within the primary
jurisdiction of the COA. [UP v. Dizon (2012)]
Conditions to be met before resort to satisfaction by levy:
1. If the judgment obligor cannot pay all or part of Procedure:
the obligation then the officer shall levy upon the 1. Levy shall be made by serving notice upon:
properties of the judgment obligor a. The person owing such debts, or
2. Characteristics of properties to be levied b. Having in his possession or control such
a. Properties of every kind and nature credits to which judgment obligor is entitled
whatsoever
b. Which may be disposed of for value 2. Garnishment to cover only such amount as will
c. Not otherwise exempt from execution satisfy judgment and lawful fees
The Officer may levy on: 8. Lawful fees shall be paid directly to court
1. Debts due the judgment obligor and other credits,
2. Including bank deposits, financial interests,
royalties, commissions,
3. And other personal property not capable of
manual delivery in possession and control of
third parties
110
EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS FOR SPECIFIC remove the same within a reasonable time fixed by the
ACTS court.
Procedure:
1. Court may direct the act to be done
a. At the cost of disobedient party
b. Or by some other person appointed by the
court
Procedure:
1. A writ of execution shall be issued. Attached to
this is a certified copy of the judgment
Examples:
1. A judgment in mandamus to reinstate petitioner
as chief clinic of the hospital (Vital-Gozon v. CA)
2. A judgment directing petitioner to vacate the
land which is a judgment to deliver possession of
real property and not special judgment. No
contempt for refusal (Moslem v. Soriano)
3. A judgment directing defendant to remove a
fence from a certain place is a special judgment
(Marquez v. Marquez)
112
PROPERTIES EXEMPT FROM EXECUTION attendance [ART 1708, CIVIL CODE]; benefit
payments from SSS [Section 16, RA 1161 AS
General Rule: Except as otherwise expressly provided by AMENDED])
law, the following property, and no other, shall be exempt
from execution (Rule 39, Sec. 13) Exception: However, no article or species of property
1. The judgment obligor's family home as provided mentioned in this section shall be exempt from:
by law, or the homestead in which he resides, and 1. Execution issued upon a judgment recovered for
land necessarily used in connection therewith; its price, or
2. Upon a judgment of foreclosure of a mortgage
2. Ordinary tools and implements personally used thereon.
by him in his trade, employment, or livelihood;
The exemptions MUST BE CLAIMED, otherwise they are
3. Three horses, or three cows, or three carabaos, or deemed waived. It is not the duty of the sheriff to set off
other beasts of burden, such as the judgment the exceptions on his own initiative. (Herrera v.
obligor may select necessarily used by him in his Mcmicking, 1909)
ordinary occupation;
113
RETURN OF WRIT OF EXECUTION PROCEEDINGS WHERE PROPERTY CLAIMED
BY THIRD PERSON
Procedure for Return of Writ of Execution if Judgment is
Satisfied within 30 days (Rule 39, Sec. 14)
1. Writ of execution shall be returnable to the court CONCEPTS
issuing it immediately after judgment has been
satisfied in part or in full Rule 39, Sec. 16 and other provisions which provide for a
mode of recovering property allegedly to have been
2. The return shall set forth the whole of the wrongfully taken by sheriff pursuant to a writ of
proceedings taken execution or other process, refers to a STRANGER to an
action.
3. Return is filed with the court
Remedies of Third-Party Claimant:
4. It shall also be reproduced and copies thereof 1. Summary hearing before the court which
furnished to parties authorized the execution
2. “Terceria” or third-party claim filed with the
Procedure if Judgment is NOT satisfied within 30 days: sheriff (Rule 39, Sec. 16)
1. Officer shall report to the court stating the reason 3. Action for damages on the bond posted by the
for non-satisfaction judgment creditor
4. Independent reivindicatory action
2. The writ shall continue in effect during the period
within which judgment may be enforced by The aforementioned are cumulative remedies and may be
motion resorted to by a third-party claimant independently of or
separately from and without need of availing of the
3. Officer shall make a report to the court every 30 others. [Sy v. Discaya (1990)]
days on the proceedings taken thereon, until
either: For a Third-Party Claim to be Sufficient:
a. Judgment is satisfied in full, or 1. Must be filed by a person other than the
b. Its effectivity expires defendant or his agent, at any time before sale
2. Must be under oath or supported by affidavit
4. The periodic reports shall: stating the claimant’s title to, or right of
a. Set forth the whole of the proceedings taken, possession of, the property, and grounds therefor
and 3. Must be served upon the officer making levy and
b. Be filed with the court a copy thereof upon the judgment creditor
c. Be reproduced and copies thereof furnished
to parties The timing of the filing of the claim is important because
it determines the remedies available to the claimant:
NOTE: The lifetime of a writ of execution is without limit 1. If the claim is filed under Rule 39, Sec. 16:
for as long as the judgment has not been satisfied. a. Claimant may vindicate his claim in a
separate action
But it is returnable to the court issuing it immediately b. Intervention is no longer allowed since
after judgment has been satisfied in full or in part. judgment has already been rendered
The writ shall continue in effect during period within 2. If the claim is filed under Sec. 14, Rule 57
which the judgment may be enforced by motion which is (Attachment) or under Sec. 7, Rule 60 (Replevin)
5 years from date of entry. After the first 5 years, a. Claimant may vindicate his claim by
judgment becomes dormant and subject to revival action. intervention as he has a legal interest in the
matter of litigation
b. Intervention is allowed as these actions are
still pending in court
114
the supervisory power of the court which authorized such thereto, before the court can exercise its supervisory
execution power to direct the release of the property mistakenly
levied and the restoration thereof to its rightful owner,
Procedure: the claimant must first unmistakably establish his
1. Claimant files application ownership or right of possession thereon. (Magdalena T.
Villasi v. Filomena Garcia, substituted by his heirs, namely,
2. Court conducts summary hearing Ermelinda H. Garcia, et al, 2014)
a. The court may command that the property
be released from the mistaken levy and In Spouses Sy v. Hon. Discaya (1990]), SC declared that for
restored to rightful owner or possessor a third-party claim or a terceria to prosper, the claimant
b. If claimant’s proofs do not persuade, the must first sufficiently establish his right on the property
claim will be denied by the court
Independent of the foregoing, a third-party claimant may 2. No need to file a claim in the court which issued a
also avail of the remedy of Terceria. Terceria is provided writ. The latter is not a condition sine qua non for
in Sec. 16, Rule 39. the former.
This is an action for damages by claimant against officer 3. In such proper action, validity and sufficiency of
within 120 days from date of filing of bond for taking or title of claimant will be resolved.
keeping the property subject of the terceria
4. A writ of preliminary injunction against sheriff
Procedure may be issued
1. Claimant serves on the officer making levy an
affidavit of his title and a copy thereof to
judgment creditor
WHEN AVAILABLE In all cases, judgment debtor shall have the entire 1 year
1. For personal property – there is NO right of period from date of registration of sale to redeem the
redemption as the sale is absolute property. If judgment debtor redeems, no further
2. For real property – right of redemption is redemption is allowed (Sec. 29).
available
NOTE: There is no extension or interruption of
WHO MAY REDEEM REAL PROPERTY SO SOLD (Rule redemption period.
39, Sec. 27)
RIGHTS PENDING REDEMPTION (Rule 39, Sec. 31 and RECOVERY OF PRICE IF SALE IS NOT EFFECTIVE (Rule
32) 39, Sec. 34)
Right of Judgment Creditor Pending Redemption Purchaser may recover the purchase price WHEN:
1. Apply for injunction to restrain the commission 1. Purchaser or his successor-in-interest fails to
of waste on the property recover possession the property; or
2. Evicted due to:
Rights of the Judgment Debtor Pending Redemption a. Irregularities in the proceedings concerning
1. Remain in possession of the property the sale; or
2. Cannot be ejected b. Judgment has been reversed or set aside; or
3. Use the property in the same manner it was c. The property sold was exempt form
previously used execution; or
4. Make necessary repairs to buildings thereon d. A third person has vindicated his claim to the
while he occupies the property property
5. Use it in the ordinary course of husbandry (Sec.
31); and Remedies of the Purchaser
6. Collect rents, earning and income derived from 1. File a motion in the same action or file a separate
property until the expiration of period of action to recover from judgment creditor the
redemption price paid
2. File a motion for revival of judgment in his name
against judgment debtor; or
EXPIRATION OF REDEMPTION PERIOD (Rule 39, Sec. 3. Bring an action to recover possession of property
33)
Effect of revived judgment – it has the same force and
Judgment obligor shall have the entire period of ONE effect as an original judgment would have as of the date of
YEAR from date of registration of sale to redeem the revival and no more
property
DUAL ASPECT OF RES JUDICATA Exception: Section 3, Rule 17 of ROC: If plaintiff fails to
appear at the time of the trial , or to prosecute his action
1. Bar by Former Judgment - Direct Estoppel by for an unreasonable length of time, or to comply with
Judgment; covers paragraph (a) and (b) these rules or any order of the court, the action may be
2. Conclusiveness of Judgment –Estoppel by Verdict, dismissed upon motion of the defendant or upon the
Estoppel by Record, Collateral Estoppel by court's own motion . This dismissal shall have the effect of
Judgment or Preclusion of Issues or Rule of Auter an adjudication upon the merits , unless otherwise
Action Pendant; it covers paragraph (c) provided by court. [Development Bank v. CA]
119
EFFECT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS OR FINAL
Issue Preclusion – The first judgment precludes the re- ORDERS
litigation of a particular fact or issue in another action
between the same parties on a different cause of action.
PUBLIC POLICY PRINCIPLE
Requisite: Identity of ISSUES
A judgment by a foreign court is enforceable only within
its territorial jurisdiction.
RES JUDICATA v. LAW OF THE CASE v. STARE DECISIS
A valid judgment rendered by a foreign tribunal may be
Stare Decisis - When the SC has laid down a principle of recognized insofar as the immediate parties the
law applicable to a certain state of facts, it will adhere to underlying cause of action are concerned so long as it is
that principle and apply to it all future cases where the convincingly shown that:
facts are substantially the same 1. There has been an opportunity for a fair hearing
before a court of competent jurisdiction
Doctrine of the Law of the Case - Whatever is once 2. Trial upon registered proceedings has been
irrevocably established as the controlling legal rule or conducted
decision between the same parties in the case continues 3. There is nothing to indicate either a prejudice in
to be the law of the case whether correct on general court and in the system of laws under which it is
principles or not, so long as the facts on which such sitting or fraud in procuring the judgment
decision was predicated continue to be the facts of the [Philippine Aluminum v. Fasgi Enterprises (2000)]
case before the court.
Such limitation on the review of foreign judgment is
As discussed in Ayala Corp. v. Rosa-Diana Realty, 2000: adopted in all legal systems to avoid repetitive litigation
on claims and issues, prevent harassment of the parties
Res Judicata “Law of the Case” Stare Decisis and avoid undue imposition on the courts.
Operates only in
The ruling in
the particular and This policy of preclusion rests on principles of comity,
one case is
single case where utility and convenience of nations.
carried over to
the ruling arises
another case
and is not carried As a generally accepted principle of international law, it is
between the
into other cases as part of the law of the Philippines by virtue of the
same parties
a precedent Incorporation Clause [Section 2, Article II of the 1987
Once a point of Constitution] [Regalado]
law has been
established by the Two Ways of Giving Effect to Foreign Judgment:
The ruling
court, that point 1. An ordinary action to enforce the foreign
adhered to in the
of law will, judgment may be filed in court; or
particular case
generally, be 2. It may be pleaded in an Answer or a Motion to
need not be
followed by the Dismiss.
followed as a
same court and by
precedent in
all courts of lower
subsequent
rank in EFFECT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (Rule 39, Sec. 48)
litigation between
subsequent cases
other parties
where the same NATURE EFFECT
legal issue is In judgments against a Judgment is CONCLUSIVE
raised specific thing (in rem) upon the title to the thing
Judgment is PRESUMPTIVE
evidence of a right as
In judgments against a
between parties and their
person (in personam)
successors-in-interest by a
subsequent title
121
PROVISIONAL
PRELIMINARY ATTACHMENT
DEFINITION
Orders granting or denying provisional remedies are GROUNDS FOR ISSUANCE (Rule 57, Sec. 1)
merely interlocutory and cannot be the subject of an
appeal. They may however be challenged before a There are only specific situations where preliminary
superior court through a petition for certiorari under Rule attachment may issue. The grounds are EXCLUSIVE:
65.
1. Action for recovery of a specified amount of
The Provisional Remedies under the Rules of Court money or damages, EXCEPT moral and
1. Preliminary Attachment (Rule 57) exemplary,
2. Preliminary Injunction (Rule 58) a. On a cause of action arising from law,
3. Receivership (Rule 59) contract, quasi-contract, delict, or quasi-
4. Replevin (Rule 60) delict
5. Support Pendente Lite (Rule 61) b. Against a party who is about to depart from
the Philippines with intent to defraud his
NOTE: The enumeration above is not exclusive. The creditors;
court may invoke its equity jurisdiction and order the
appropriate reliefs during the pendency of an action 2. Action for money or property, embezzled or
fraudulently misapplied or converted to his own
use by either:
JURISDICTION OVER PROVISIONAL a. A public officer, an officer of a corporation,
REMEDIES an attorney, factor, broker, agent, or clerk, in
the course of his employment as such,
The court which grants or issues a provisional remedy is b. OR by any other person in a fiduciary
the court which has jurisdiction over the main action. capacity, or for a willful violation of duty;
Inferior courts may also grant all appropriate provisional 3. Action to recover the possession of property
remedies in an action pending with it and is within its unjustly or fraudulently taken, detained or
jurisdiction (Sec. 33, (1), BP 129) converted,
a. When the property, or any part thereof, has
been concealed, removed, or disposed of to
prevent its being found or taken by the
applicant or an authorized person;
122
NOTE: the delivery of counterfeit money 1. Writ may be prayed for in the complaint itself
or knowingly issuing a bounced check providing the allegations warranting its issuance
are considered as grounds under this 2. May be issued pursuant to a separate motion for
rule [Riano] attachment whenever the writ is not prayed for
in the original complaint
5. Action against a party who has removed or
disposed of his property, or is about to do so, Three Stages in the Grant of a Preliminary Attachment:
AND with intent to defraud his creditors; or 1. The court issues the order granting the
application
6. Action against a party who does not reside and is 2. Writ of attachment issues pursuant to the order
not found in the Philippines, OR on whom granting the writ
summons may be served by publication. 3. The writ is implemented
Note: the rule also refers to persons on NOTE: For the initial two stages, it is not
whom summons may be served by necessary that jurisdiction over person of
publication and against whose property, defendant be first obtained
preliminary attachment may be availed
of such as: However, once implementation of writ
(1) Residents defendants whose identity commences, court must have acquired
or whose whereabouts are unknown jurisdiction over the defendant for without such
[Rule 14, Sec. 14] jurisdiction, the court has no power or authority
(2) Resident defendants who are to act
temporarily out of the country [Rule
14, Sec. 16] Issuance of the Order of Attachment
1. The order may be issued either:
a. Ex parte (service of summons to defendant
REQUISITES FOR PRELIMINARY ATTACHMENT TO required)
ISSUE: b. Or upon motion with notice and hearing
1. The case must be any of those where preliminary 2. The order is issued by the court in which the
attachment is proper (Sec. 1, Rule 57) action is pending or the CA, or the SC
2. Applicant must file a motion whether ex parte or
with notice and hearing Contents of the Order of Attachment:
3. Applicant must show by affidavit that there is no 1. It must require the sheriff to attach so much of
sufficient security for the claim sought to be the property of the party against whom it is
enforced and that the amount claimed in the issued as may be sufficient to satisfy applicant’s
action is as much as the sum of which the order is demand
granted above all counterclaims a. Property must be within the Philippines
4. Applicant must post a bond executed to adverse b. And it must not be exempt from execution
party
2. It shall contain an amount for the attachment
A writ of preliminary attachment is too harsh a bond:
provisional remedy to be issued based on a. The amount sufficient to satisfy the
mere abstractions of fraud. Rather, the rules require that applicant’s demand, or
for the writ to issue, there must be a recitation of clear b. The value of the property to be attached as
and concrete factual circumstances manifesting that the stated by applicant
debtor practiced fraud upon the creditor at the time of the
execution of their agreement in that said debtor had a
preconceived plan or intention not to pay the creditor. AFFIDAVIT AND BOND (Rule 57, Sec. 3 and 4)
[Equitable v. Special Steel (2012)]
For the writ to issue, the applicant must submit an
affidavit and post bond. The affidavit and bond required
ISSUANCE AND CONTENTS OF ORDER OF must be duly filed with the clerk before order issues
ATTACHMENT (Rule 57, Sec. 2)
Contents of the Affidavit: The affidavit must establish:
When may one apply: A preliminary attachment may be 1. A sufficient cause of action exists
applied for 2. Cause is one of those mentioned in Sec. 1
1. At the commencement of the action or 3. No other sufficient security for the claim sought
2. At any time before the entry of judgment. to be enforced by action
4. Amount due to applicant or possession of which
Who may apply: It may be applied for by the plaintiff OR is entitled to recover is as much as the sum for
any proper party (including a defendant who filed a which the order is granted above all legal
counterclaim, cross-claim, or a third party complaint) counterclaims
ATTACHMENT OF REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY Property in custodia legis may be attached by:
(Rule 57, Sec. 7) 1. Filing a copy of the writ of attachment with the
proper court or quasi-judicial agency
1. Real property, or growing crops thereon, or any 2. Serving a notice of attachment upon the
interest therein custodian of the property [Rule 57, Sec. 7]
a. File with the Registry of Deeds:
(1) A copy of the order together with a A previously attached property may also be subsequently
description of the property attached. But the first attachment shall have priority over
(2) And a notice that the property is subsequent attachments. [Riano]
attached
b. The registrar of deeds must index
attachments in the names of the applicant, PROCEEDINGS WHERE ATTACHED PROPERTY IS
adverse party, or person by whom the CLAIMED BY THIRD PERSON
124
A third person who has a claim to the property attached issuance, does not operate to discharge the
may avail of the following remedies: sureties on the attachment bond
2. That bond is executed to adverse party
1. File terceria or third-party claim (Rule 57, Sec. 14) conditioned that the applicant will pay all the
a. Note that a third-party claim may be filed costs which may be adjudged to adverse party
with the sheriff while has possession of the and all damages which he may sustain by reason
properties levied upon, this being the only of the attachment, if the court shall finally
time fixed for the purpose adjudge that applicant was not entitled thereto
b. The claimant makes an affidavit of his title or (Sec. 4)
right to possession, stating the grounds of 3. Until that determination is made, as to applicant’s
such right or title. The affidavit must be entitlement to attachment, his bond must stand
served upon the sheriff and cannot be withdrawn
c. Substantial identical procedure as in terceria
in Rule 39, Sec. 16
SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT OUT OF PROPERTY
2. File independent action to recover property; or ATTACHED (Rule 57, Sec. 15)
Preliminary Injunction is an ancillary or preventive It does NOT direct the doing or undoing of acts but is an
remedy where a court requires a person, a party or even a order to maintain the last, actual, peaceable and
court or tribunal either to REFRAIN (prohibitory) from or uncontested state of things which preceded the
to PERFORM (mandatory) particular acts during the controversy.
pendency of an action. It is only a temporary remedy.
WHEN WRIT MAY BE ISSUED Procedure: When an application for a writ of preliminary
injunction or TRO is included in a complaint or initiatory
When: It may be issued at ANY stage PRIOR to the pleading, the case, if filed in a multiple-sala, shall proceed
judgment or final order as follows:
1. Verified complaint and bond is filed
Who: It may be granted by the court where the action or 2. Determine if there is great or irreparable injury
proceeding is pending. If the action or proceeding is or extreme urgency, which warrants the issuance
pending in the Court of Appeals or in the Supreme Court, of a TRO
it may be issued by said court or any member thereof. a. If yes, go to Procedure for Issuance of TRO
(Rule 58, Sec. 2) 3. In both cases, Notice shall then be served to the
party sought to be enjoined
(a) There must be prior and contemporaneous
GROUNDS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PRELIMINARY service of summons (exceptions also apply)
INJUNCTION (Rule 58, Sec. 3)
Procedure for Issuance of TRO:
Preliminary injunction may be granted when it is 1. If it appears that great or irreparable injury
established that: would result to the applicant before the matter
1. Applicant is entitled to the relief demanded, or can be heard on notice:
2. Commission, continuance, or non-performance of a. Summary hearing on the application of the
the act complained of would work injustice to TRO within 24 hours after sheriff’s return of
applicant, or service and/or records are received by the
branch selected by raffle
127
b. The court may issue a TRO effective for 20 Upon the expiration of the non-extendible period, the TRO
days from service on the party sought to be is automatically terminated. No judicial declaration
enjoined necessary.
Exception:
128
Where the summons could not be served personally or by RECEIVERSHIP
substituted service despite diligent efforts, or the adverse
party is a resident of the Philippines temporarily absent NATURE
therefrom or is a nonresident thereof, the requirement of
prior or contemporaneous service of summons shall not Receiver – A person appointed by the court in behalf of all
apply. [Rule 58, Sec.4] The executive judge of a multiple- the parties to the action for the purpose of preserving and
sala court or the presiding judge of a single sala court may conserving the property in litigation and prevent its
issue ex parte a TRO effective for only 72 hours from possible destruction or dissipation if it were left in the
issuance if the matter is of extreme urgency and the possession of any of the parties.
applicant will suffer grave injustice and irreparable
injury. However, he shall immediately comply with the Purpose
provisions of Rule 38, Sec. 4 as to service of summons and
the documents to be served therewith. [Rule 38, Sec. 5] The purpose of a receivership as a provisional remedy is
to protect and preserve the rights of the parties during
WHEN FINAL INJUNCTION GRANTED the pendency of the main action, during the pendency of
an appeal or as an aid in the execution of a judgment
If after the trial of the action it appears that the applicant when the writ of execution has been returned unsatisfied.
is entitled to have the act or acts complained of
permanently enjoined, the court shall grant a final The receivership under Rule 59 is directed to the
injunction perpetually restraining the party or person property which is the subject of the action and does not
enjoined from the commission or continuance of the act refer to the receivership authorized under banking laws
or acts or confirming the preliminary mandatory and other rules or laws. Rule 59 presupposes that there is
injunction. (Rule 58, Sec. 9) an action and that the property subject of the action
requires its preservation. Receivership under Rule 59 is
ancillary to the main action. (Riano).
129
and feasible means of preserving, administering, 3. Bond posted by applicant for grant of
or disposing of the property in litigation. receivership is insufficient (Sec. 5)
4. Bond of the receiver is insufficient (Sec. 5)
Specific cases where receiver was appointed
1. If a spouse without just cause abandons the other
or fails to comply with his/her obligations to the THE RECEIVER
family, the aggrieved spouse may petition the
court for receivership. [Family Code, Article 101] Who May Be Appointed As Receiver
2. The court may appoint a receiver of the property
of the judgment obligor; and it may also forbid a The general rule is that neither party to the litigation
transfer or other disposition of, or any should be appointed as a receiver without the consent of
interference with, the property of the judgment the other because a receiver is supposed to be an
obligor not exempt from execution. [Rule 39, Sec. impartial and disinterested person. (Alcantara v. Abbas,
41] 1963)
3. After the perfection of an appeal, the trial court
retains jurisdiction to appoint a receiver of the A clerk of court should not be appointed as a receiver as
property under litigation since this matter does he is already burdened with his official duties. (Arigo v.
not touch upon the subject of the appeal. [Rule Kayanan, 1983)
41, Sec. 9; Acuña v. Caluag (1957)]
4. After final judgment, a receiver may be appointed Powers of a Receiver
as an aid to the execution of judgment. 1. Bring and defend in such capacity actions in his
[Philippine Trust Company v. Santamaria (1929)] own name with leave of court
5. Appointment of a receiver over the property in 2. Take and keep possession of the property in
custodia legis may be allowed when it is justified controversy
by special circumstances, as when it is 3. Receive rents
reasonably necessary to secure and protect the 4. Collect debts due to himself as receiver or to the
rights of the real owner. [Dolar v. Sundiam fund, property, estate, person, or corporation of
(1971)] which he is the receiver
5. Compound for and compromise the same
6. Make transfers
REQUISITES; REQUIREMENTS BEFORE ISSUANCE OF 7. Pay outstanding debts
AN ORDER 8. Divide the money and other property that shall
remain among the persons legally entitled to
Procedure: receive the same’
1. Verified application filed by the party requesting 9. Generally, to do such acts respecting the property
for the appointment of the receiver; as the court may authorize
2. Applicant must have an interest in the property 10. Invest funds in his hands, ONLY by order of the
or funds subject of the action; court upon the written consent of all the parties.
3. Applicant must show that the property or funds [Rule 59, Sec. 6]
is in danger of being lost, wasted, or dissipated;
4. Application must be with notice and must be set Liability for refusal or neglect to deliver property to
for hearing; receiver:
5. Before appointing a receiver, the court shall 1. Contempt; and
require applicant to post a bond in favor of the 2. Be liable to the receiver for the money or the
adverse party. When the receiver is appointed, value of the property and other things so refused
the receiver shall file a bond then take his oath. or neglected to be surrendered together with all
6. Before entering upon his duties, the receiver damages that may have been sustained by the
must be sworn to perform his duties faithfully. party or parties entitled thereto as a consequence
of such refusal or neglect. [Rule 59, Sec. 7]
Who Appoints Receiver:
1. Court where the action is pending Remedies Against the Receiver
2. CA 1. No action against receiver can be maintained
3. SC without leave of court
4. During the pendency of an appeal, the appellate 2. An aggrieved party may:
court may allow an application for the a. Take the matter into the court which
appointment of a receiver to be filed in and appointed the receiver and ask either for an
decided by the court of origin. [Rule 59, Sec. 1] accounting or take some other proceeding,
and ask for consequent judgment on the acts
Receivership may be denied or lifted: complained of; or
1. If the appointment was sought or granted b. Ask for leave of court to bring him an action
without sufficient cause (Sec. 3) directly
2. Adverse party files a sufficient bond to answer
for damages (Sec. 3)
TWO KINDS OF BOND
130
4. Receiver entitled to reasonable compensation to
The Applicant’s Bond be taxed as costs against defeated party
1. Applicant must file a bond executed to the party
against whom the application is presented
a. Amount to be fixed by the court
b. CONDITION: To the effect that applicant will
pay such party all damages he may sustain by
reason of the appointment IN CASE the
applicant shall have procured such without
sufficient cause
2. The court may require additional bond after
appointment in the exercise of its discretion as
further security for such damages (Rule 59, Sec.
2)
TERMINATION OF RECEIVERSHIP
Procedure:
1. The court shall determine that the necessity for a
receiver no longer exists
a. Motu proprio, or on motion of either party
2. Due notice shall be given to all interested parties
3. A hearing shall be conducted
4. The court shall then settle the accounts of the
receiver
5. The court directs delivery of the funds and other
property in his possession to the person
adjudged to be entitled to receive them
6. The court will then order the discharge of the
receiver
Effect:
1. Settle accounts of receiver
2. Delivery of funds to person entitled
3. Discharge of receiver
131
REPLEVIN
WHEN MAY WRIT BE ISSUED
NATURE
When Applied For – A writ of replevin must be applied for:
Replevin is the provisional remedy seeking for the 1. At the commencement of the action, or
possession of the property prior to the determination of 2. At any time before defendant files his answer
the main action for replevin.
NOTE: There can be no replevin before the appellate
Replevin may also be a main action with the ultimate goal courts
of recovering personal property capable of manual
delivery wrongfully detained by a person. In this sense, it The provisional remedy of replevin is available where the
is a suit in itself PRINCIPAL PURPOSE of the action is to recover the
possession of PERSONAL property.
WRIT OF PRELIMINAY
WRIT OF REPLEVIN Who May Avail of the Remedy?
ATTACHMENT
The purpose is to have the 1. Plaintiff – where the complaint prays for
property put in the recovery of possession of personal property
The purpose is to recover custody of the court to 2. Defendant – where a counterclaim was set out in
personal property capable secure the satisfaction of the answer for recovery of personal property
of manual delivery from the judgment that may be
the defendant rendered in favor of the It is available to any other party asserting affirmative
plaintiff at some future allegations praying for the recovery of personal
time property unjustly detained.
The property either
belongs to the plaintiff or The property does not
one over which the belong to the plaintiff but REQUISITES
plaintiff has a right of to the defendant
possession 1. Applicant is owner of the property claimed or is
May be sought only when Available even if recovery entitled to possession
the principal action is for of property is only 2. Property is wrongfully detained by the adverse
the recovery of personal incidental to the relief party
property sought 3. Property is not distrained or taken for tax
Can be sought only when assessment or fine pursuant to law, or seized (if
May be resorted to even if seized, that the property is exempt)
defendant is in actual or
property is in possession 4. Principal purpose of the action is to recover
constructive possession of
of a third person possession of personal property
the property
Cannot be availed of when Can be availed of even if
property is in custodia property is in custodia
PROCEDURE (Rule 60, Sec. 2 and 3)
legis legis
Available from
Available before 1. An application is filed at the commencement of
commencement but before
defendant answers the action or at any time before answer of
entry of judgment
defendant
Bond is double the value
Bond is fixed by the court 2. Application must contain an affidavit
of the property
3. Applicant must file a bond
Extends only to personal Extends to all kinds of 4. Approval of the bond by the court
property capable of property whether real, 5. Court shall then issue an order and the writ of
manual delivery personal, or incorporeal replevin:
Attachment to recover a. It must describe the personal property
possession of personal alleged to be wrongfully detained
Available to recover
property unjustly detained b. Requiring the sheriff to take such property
personal property even if
presupposes that the same into his custody
the same is not being
is being concealed,
concealed, removed, or
removed, or disposed of to NOTE: The writ of replevin may be served anywhere in
disposed of
prevent its being found or the Philippines.
taken by the applicant
NOTE: There can be no replevin and preliminary AFFIDAVIT AND BOND; REDELIVERY BOND
attachment in the same case because the purposes are
different. Contents of the Affidavit
1. In Rule 57, it is for security 1. That the applicant is:
2. In Rule 60, it is for recovery of possession a. The owner of the property claimed –
describe with particularity
b. Or is entitled to possession
132
a. If it be in the possession of the adverse party
2. Property is wrongfully detained by adverse party or his agent – Take the property into custody
a. Allege the cause of detention b. If property is concealed in a building or
b. According to his best knowledge, enclosure:
information, belief (1) Demand delivery of the property
(2) If not delivered, cause the building or
3. That the property has not been : enclosure to be broken open and then
a. Distrained, or take the property into possession
b. Taken for a tax assessment, or
c. Taken as a fine pursuant to law, or 3. After taking possession:
d. Seized under a writ of execution or a. Keep the property in a secure place
preliminary attachment, or under custodia b. He shall be responsible for delivery to party
legis; if so taken, that said property is exempt entitled
4. The affidavit must also state the actual value of Unlike a preliminary attachment and preliminary
the property subject of replevin and not just its injunction, the rule on prior or contemporaneous
probable value. This value will be the basis of the jurisdiction is not provided for in replevin.
bond.
However, the rule requires that upon such order, the
The Applicant’s Bond sheriff must serve a copy on the adverse party together
1. Executed to the adverse party with the required documents.
2. Amount is DOUBLE the value of the property
stated in the affidavit A sheriff’s prerogative does not give him the liberty to
3. Conditions of the Bond: determine who among the parties is entitled to
a. The return to of property to adverse party, if possession.
such return be adjudged, and
b. The payment to adverse party of such sum as When a writ is placed in the hands of a sheriff, it is his
he may recover from the applicant in the duty to proceed with reasonable celerity and promptness
action to execute it according to its mandate.
The Redelivery Bond The sheriff shall retain the property for 5 days; Within
1. This is executed to the applicant and filed where such period, the adverse party:
the action is pending 1. May object to the sufficiency of the applicant’s
2. Amount is double the value of the property as bond or surety; or
stated in the affidavit of the applicant 2. May file a redelivery bond, if he does not object to
3. Conditions of the Bond: the sufficiency of the bond
a. The delivery thereof to the applicant, if such
delivery be adjudged, and NOTE: These remedies are alternative.
b. The payment of such sum to him as may be
recovered against the adverse party
After trial of the issues, the court shall determine who has
the right of possession to and the value of the property
and shall render judgment in the alternative for the
delivery thereof to the party entitled to the same, or for
its value in case delivery cannot be made, and also for
such damages as either party may prove, with costs.
134
A COMPARATIVE CHART ON THE PROVISIONAL REMEDIES
Preliminary Attachment Preliminary Injunction Receivership Replevin
To have the property of adverse party
To require a party or a court, agency, or
attached as security for satisfaction of
a person to reframe from doing a
judgment that may be recovered in
particular act/s To place the property subject of an
cases falling under Sec. 1, Rule 57
auction or proceeding under the control
To enable the court to acquire To recover possession of personal
PURPOSE of a third party for its preservation and
jurisdiction over the action by the actual property
administration pendente lite or as an
or constructive seizure of the property Or to require the performance of
aid to execution
in those instances where personal particular act/s
service of summons on creditor cannot
be effected
SUBJECT Personal property capable of manual
Personal or real property Particular act/s Personal or real property
MATTER delivery
At any time prior to satisfaction of
At the commencement of action
WHEN APPLIED/ At any stage prior to final judgment or judgment At the commencement of the action
OR `At any time prior to entry of
GRANTED final order It may be availed of even after judgment BUT before the filing of answer
judgment
becomes final under Sec. 41, Rule 39
File verified application and applicant’s File verified application and applicant’s
bond bond
If application is included in initiatory
HOW APPLIED FOR File affidavits and applicant’s bond pleading, adverse party should be Application may also be included in File affidavits and applicant’s bond
served with summons together with a initiatory pleading in actions for
copy of initiatory pleading and foreclosure of mortgage
applicant’s bond
Required
EXCEPT:
REQUIREMENT Not required Great or irreparable injury would result Not Required
Required
OF A HEARING May be issued ex parte or Extreme urgency and applicant will May be issued ex parte
suffer grave injustice and irreparable
injury (Sec. 5, Rule 58
Only the court where the action is Court where action is pending
pending The CA or SC even if action is pending in
Courts where the action is pending, the
Lower court, CA or SC provided action is the lower court
WHO MAY GRANT CA or the SC even if action is pending in Only the court were action is pending
pending in the same court which issues Appellate court may allow application
lower court
the injunction for receivership to be decided by the
Also with the Sandiganbayan and CTA court of origin
1. Applicant is entitled to relief
1. Applicant has interest in property or
1. Sufficient cause of action demanded 1. Applicant is owner of the property
fund, subject matter of action
2. Case is covered by Sec. 1, Rule 57 2. Act/s complained of would work claimed or is entitled to possession
2. Property or fund is in danger of
3. No other sufficient security for the injustice to applicant if not enjoined 2. Property is wrongfully detained by
REQUISITES FOR being lost, or removed, or material
claim exists 3. Acts sought to be enjoined probably the adverse party
GRANTING injured
4. Amount due to applicant or value of violates applicant’s rights respecting 3. Property is not distrained or taken
APPLICATION 3. Appointment is the most convenient
property he is entitled to recover is the subject of the action or for tax assessment or fine pursuant
and feasible means of preserving,
equal to the sum which the order of proceeding to law, or seized (if seized, that the
administering, disposing of
attachment is granted 4. Threatened injury incapable of property is exempt)
property in litigation
pecuniary estimation
135
SPECIAL CIVIL
d. Partition
e. Expropriation
ORDINARY CIVIL ACTIONS v. SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS Actions for certiorari, prohibition and mandamus should
be commenced in the proper RTC, but the same may, in
A special civil action is governed by the rules of ordinary proper cases, be commenced in the SC or the CA and a
civil actions but there are certain rules that are applicable specific rule of venue is provided for quo warranto
only to special civil actions. proceedings
ORDINARY CIVIL ACTION SPECIAL CIVIL ACTION In the absence of special reasons, the SC will decline
Also governed by ordinary original jurisdiction in certiorari, prohibition, and
Governed by ordinary mandamus since it is not a trier of facts and, that is a
rules but subject to specific
rules function which can be better done by the trial courts. The
rules prescribed
Formal demand of one’s same rule applies for quo warranto wherein the SC has
legal rights in a court of concurrent jurisdiction with the RTC.
Special features not found
justice in the manner
in ordinary civil actions Special civil actions that can be filed in or are within the
prescribed by the court or
by the law jurisdiction of inferior courts:
The concept of cause of 1. Interpleader -- Provided that amount involved is
Must be based on a cause within its jurisdiction
action in an ordinary
of action which means 2. Ejectment suits
action does not always fit
that the defendant has 3. Contempt
in a special civil action (e.g.
violated plaintiff’s rights
interpleader)
Venue is determined by This dichotomy does not
either the residences of always apply in a special
the parties when action is civil action (e.g. the venue
personal or by the in a petition for quo-
location of the property warranto is where the SC
when the action is real or CA sits)
There are special civil
actions which can be filed
with the MTC (e.g. forcible
entry and unlawful
May be filed initially in
detainer)
either the MTC or RTC
There are also those which
cannot be commenced in
the MTC (e.g. certiorari,
prohibition, mandamus)
They are denominated as Some special civil actions
“complaints” when filed are initiated by petitions
WHEN TO FILE
137
DECLARATORY RELIEFS AND SIMILAR
REMEDIES It is filed In the appropriate RTC (incapable of pecuniary
estimation)
NATURE
Original jurisdiction of a petition for declaratory relief is
In Declaratory Relief, the subject matter is a deed, will, with the RTC.
contract, or other written instrument, statute, executive
order, or regulation, or ordinance;
REQUISITES OF ACTION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF
Note: The enumeration of the subject matter is
EXCLUSIVE 1. Subject matter of controversy must be a deed,
will, contract, or other written instrument,
Issue is the validity or construction of the subject matter statute, executive order or regulation, or
ordinance. (Enumeration is exclusive)
Relief: declaration of the petitioner’s rights and duties
2. Actual justiciable controversy or “ripening seeds”
Purpose: To relieve the litigants of the common law rule of one between person whose interests are
that no declaration of rights may be judicially adjudged adverse
unless a right has been violated and for the violation of
which relief may be granted. 3. No breach of documents in question
WHO MAY FILE THE ACTION (Rule 63, Sec. 1) WHEN COURT MAY REFUSE TO MAKE JUDICIAL
DECLARATION
1. Any person interested under a deed, will,
contract or other written instrument Court has DISCRETION to REFUSE to Grant Declaratory
a. He must file before breach Relief when: (Rule 63, Sec. 5)
1. The decision will not terminate the controversy
2. Any person whose rights are affected by a or uncertainty giving rise to the action; or
statute, executive order or regulation, or 2. The declaration or constitution is not necessary
ordinance, or any other governmental regulation and proper under the circumstances
a. He must file before violation
How Done: Motu proprio, or on motion
PARTIES
CONVERSION TO ORDINARY ACTION (Rule 63, Sec. 6)
1. All persons who have or claim any interest which
would be affected by the declaration [Rule 63, When proper: If before the final termination of the case, a
Sec. 2] breach or violation of the instrument or status occurs.
2. If action involves the validity of a Then, petition is converted into an ordinary action
statute/executive order/regulation/other
governmental regulation, the Solicitor General Effect of Conversion: Parties shall be allowed to file such
shall be notified. [Rule 63, Sec. 3] pleadings as may be necessary or proper
3. If action involves the validity of a local
government ordinance, the prosecutor/attorney NOTE: If there has been breach or violation BEFORE filing
of the LGU involved shall be notified. [Rule 63, of the petition, declaratory relief cannot be availed of.
Sec. 4]
PROCEEDINGS CONSIDERED AS SIMILAR REMEDIES
Non-joinder of interested persons is not a jurisdictional
defect; but persons not joined shall not be prejudiced in Actions similar to Declaratory Relief and may be brought
their interests unless otherwise provided by the Rules. under Rule 63: (may be filed with the MTC)
(Baguio Citizens Action v. City Council of Baguio, 1983) 1. Action for reformation (See Art. 1359-1369 Civil
Code)
WHERE TO FILE 2. Action to quiet title or remove cloud (See Art.
476-481 Civil Code)
138
3. Action to consolidate ownership (See Art. 1607 REVIEW OF JUDGMENTS AND FINAL ORDERS
Civil Code) OR RESOLUTION OF THE COMELEC AND COA
These remedies are considered similar to declaratory
relief because they also result in the adjudication of the SCOPE (Rule 64, Sec. 1)
legal rights of the litigants often without the need of
execution to carry the judgment into effect Applicable only to judgments and final orders of the
COMELEC and COA [Rule 64, Sec. 1]
However we must make a distinction:
1. In those cases similar to declaratory relief, the Judgments/orders of the Civil Service Commission are
court is BOUND to render judgment now reviewable by the Court of Appeals under Rule 43,
2. In actions for declaratory relief, the court MAY eliminating recourse to the Supreme Court (SC). [RA 7902;
REFUSE to exercise the power to declare rights SC Revised Administrative Circular No. 1-95]
and to construe instruments
An aggrieved party may bring the questioned judgment,
etc. directly to the SC on certiorari under Rule 65. [Rule
64, Sec. 2]
PROCEDURE
PURPOSE: PURPOSE:
PURPOSE To have For respondent
To annul or respondent to: (1) Do the
nullify a desist from act required,
proceeding further and (2) Pay
proceeding damages
Covers
Covers
discretionary Covers
discretionary
and ministerial ministerial acts
acts
acts
Negative and
Corrective
Preventive This remedy is
remedy
remedy affirmative or
To correct
To restrain or positive
usurpation of
prevent the said or negative
jurisdiction
usurpation
INJUNCTION PROHIBITION
Ordinary civil action Special civil action
Directed only to the party Directed to the court itself,
140
litigants, without in any commanding it to cease party as the petitioner and or quasi-judicial functions
manner interfering with from the exercise of a the adverse party as the is impleaded as
the court jurisdiction to which it has respondent without respondents
no legal claim impleading the lower
court or its judge
INJUNCTION MANDAMUS May be filed with the SC,
Filed only with the SC
Ordinary civil action Special civil action CA, Sandiganbayan, RTC
Directed against a tribunal, SC may deny the decision
Directed against a litigant corporation, board, or motu proprio on specific
officer grounds
Purpose is to either
Purpose is for the tribunal, NOTE: An original action for Certiorari, Prohibition, or
refrain the defendant from
corporation, board, or Mandamus, is an Independent Action, as such:
performing an act or to
officer, to perform a 1. Does not interrupt the course of the principal
perform not necessarily a
ministerial and legal duty action
legal and ministerial duty
2. Does not affect the running of the reglementary
periods involved in the proceedings
Certiorari as a Mode of Appeal and as a Special Civil Action 3. Does not stay the execution of judgment unless a
TRO or writ of preliminary injunction has been
CERTIORARI AS A MODE CERTIORARI AS A SPECIAL issued
OF APPEAL (Rule 45) CIVIL ACTION (Rule 65)
A continuation of the
An original action and not ACQUISITION OF JURISDICTION
appellate process over the
a mode of appeal
original case
May be directed against an In original actions for Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus,
interlocutory order of the when does the court acquire jurisdiction over the person
Seeks to review final court or where no appeal of the respondent? IT DEPENDS:
judgment or final orders or plain or speedy remedy 1. IF ACTION IS FILED WITH THE RTC - We follow
is available in the ordinary rules on ordinary civil actions. Jurisdiction is
course of law acquired by:
Raises questions of a. Service of summons to respondent or
jurisdiction – that is, b. By his voluntary appearance in court
whether a tribunal, board
or officer exercising 2. IF ACTION IS FILED WITH THE CA OR SC - Court
judicial or quasi-judicial acquires jurisdiction over respondents by:
Raises only questions of a. Service on them of its orders indicating its
functions has acted
law initial action on the petition or
without jurisdiction or in
excess of jurisdiction or b. By their voluntary submission to such
with grave abuse of jurisdiction
discretion amounting to
lack of jurisdiction
Filed not later than 60 REQUISITES
days from notice of
Filed within 15 days from Requisites of Certiorari:
judgment, order, or
notice of judgment or final 1. There must be a controversy
resolution sought to be
order appealed from, or of 2. Respondent is exercising judicial or quasi-judicial
assailed and in case a
the denial of petitioner’s function
motion for reconsideration
motion for 3. Respondent acted without or in excess of its
or new trial is timely filed,
reconsideration or new jurisdiction or acted with grave abuse of
the 60-day period is
trial discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction; and
counted from notice of
said denial 4. There must be no appeal or other plain, speedy,
Extension of 30 days may and adequate remedy
Extension no longer
be granted for justifiable
allowed Requisites of Prohibition:
reasons
1. There must be a controversy
Does not require a prior Motion for reconsideration
motion for is a condition precedent, 2. Respondent is exercising judicial, quasi-judicial,
or ministerial functions
reconsideration subject to exceptions
3. Respondent acted without or in excess of its
Does not stay the
jurisdiction or acted with grave abuse of
Stays the judgment judgment or order subject
discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction; and
appealed from of the petition, unless
4. There must be no appeal or other plain, speedy,
enjoined or restrained
and adequate remedy
Parties are the original The tribunal, board,
parties with the appealing officer, exercising judicial
141
Requisites of Mandamus: prevented during the pendency of the proceedings for the
1. There must be a clear legal right or duty writ, the petitioner should obtain a restraining order
If there is discretion as to the taking or non- and/or writ of preliminary injuction. [Regalado]
taking of the action sought, there is no clear
legal duty, and mandamus will not lie The office of prohibition is not to correct errors of
judgment but to prevent or restrain usurpation by
2. The act to be performed must be practical inferior tribunals and to compel them to observe the
Within the powers of the respondent to limitation of their jurisdictions. (Herrera)
perform such that if the writ of mandamus
was issued, he can comply with it, or else the General Rule: Prohibition does NOT ordinarily lie to
essence will be defeated restrain an act which is already fait accompli.
3. Respondent must be exercising a ministerial duty
A duty which is absolute and imperative and Exception: Writ of prohibition will lie to prevent the
involves merely its execution unlawful creation of a new province by those in the
4. The duty or act to be performed must be existing corridors of power who could avoid judicial intervention
A correlative right will be denied if not and review by merely speedily and stealthily completing
performed by the respondents the commission of such illegality (Tan, et al. v. COMELEC)
5. There is no other plain, speedy, and adequate
remedy in the ordinary course of law
WHEN PETITION FOR MANDAMUS PROPER
DISCRETIONARY ACT MINISTERIAL ACT
One which an officer or The purpose of mandamus is to compel the performance,
One where public tribunal performs in a when refused, of a ministerial duty, this being its main
functionaries, by virtue of given state of facts, in a objective.
a power or right conferred prescribed manner, in
upon them by law, can act obedience to the mandate A writ of mandamus will not issue to control the exercise
officially under certain of a legal authority, of official discretion or judgment, or to alter or review the
circumstances, without regard to or the action taken in the proper exercise of the discretion of
uncontrolled by the exercise of his own judgment, for the writ cannot be used as a writ of error or
judgment or conscience of judgment upon the other mode of direct review.
others propriety or impropriety
of the act done However, in extreme situations generally in criminal
cases, mandamus lies to compel the performance of the
fiscal of discretionary functions where his actuations are
WHEN PETITION FOR CERTIORARI IS PROPER tantamount to a wilful refusal to perform a required duty.
[Regalado]
Only to correct errors of jurisdiction, not errors of
judgment. Grounds for Mandamus:
1. When any tribunal, corporation, board, officer or
Questions of fact cannot be raised in an original action for person, UNLAWFULLY NEGLECTS the
certiorari. Only established or admitted facts may be performance of an act which the law specifically
considered. (Suarez, NLRC, 1998) enjoins as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or
station
Where appeal is available, certiorari will not lie. 2. When any tribunal, corporation, board, officer, or
Exceptions: person, UNLAWFULLY EXCLUDES another from
1. Where the appeal does not constitute a speedy the due and enjoyment of a right or office to
and adequate remedy which the other is entitled
2. Where orders were also issued either in excess or
without jurisdiction
3. For certain special considerations, as public MANNER OF FILING THE PETITION
welfare or public policy
4. Where, in criminal actions, the court rejects the 1. A verified petition is filed in the proper court
rebuttal evidence for the prosecution as, in case accompanied by:
of acquittal, there could be no remedy a. Certified true copy of the judgment, order,
5. Where the order is a patent nullity resolution subject thereof
6. Where the decision in the certiorari case will b. Copies of all pleadings and relevant and
avoid future litigations pertinent documents
c. Sworn certification of non-forum shopping
2. Contents of the petition
WHEN PETITION FOR INJUNCTION IS PROPER a. Allegation of facts with certainty
b. Prayer
Prohibition is a preventive remedy. However, to prevent
the respondent from performing the act sought to be Prayers:
1. In certiorari
142
a. That the judgment be rendered annulling or 9. Where the issue raised is one purely of law or
modifying the proceedings of such tribunal, where public interest is involved
board or officer; and 10. Where the subject matter of the action is
b. Granting such incidental reliefs as law and perishable
justice may require
2. In prohibition PROCEDURE
a. That the judgment be rendered commanding
the respondent to desist from further 1. A petition for certiorari/ mandamus/ prohibition
proceedings in the action or matter specified; is filed
or
b. Otherwise granting such incidental reliefs as When filed:
law and justice may require a. Not later than 60 days from notice of
judgment/order/resolution
3. In mandamus b. If a motion for reconsideration/new trial is
a. That the judgment be rendered commanding filed, the 60-day period shall be counted
the respondent, immediately or at some from notice of denial of motion.
other time to be specified by the court, to do c. Extension may be granted for compelling
the act required to be done to protect the reasons, not exceeding 15 days. [Rule 65, Sec.
rights of the petitioner ; and 4]
b. To pay the damages sustained by the
petitioner by reason of the wrongful acts of Where filed: (Follow hierarchy of courts)
the respondent a. Supreme Court
b. Court of Appeals; Whether or not the same is
in aid of its appellate jurisdiction BUT if it
EXCEPTIONS TO FILING MOTION FOR involves the acts of a quasi-judicial agency,
RECONSIDERATION BEFORE FILING PETITION the petition shall be filed only in the CA,
unless otherwise provided by law or the
General Rule: A MR is an essential precondition for the Rules.
filing of a petition for certiorari, prohibition, or c. Regional Trial Court, if it relates to acts /
mandamus. It is a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy. omissions of a lower court / corporation /
This is to enable the lower court, in the first instance, to board / officer / person. RTC must exercise
pass upon and correct its mistakes without the jurisdiction over the territorial area
intervention of the higher court d. Sandiganbayan, if it is in aid of its appellate
jurisdiction. [Rule 65, Sec. 4]
If a MR is filed, the period shall not only be interrupted e. The COMELEC in election cases involving an
but another 60 days shall be given to the petitioner within act or omission of the MTC/RTC
which to file the appropriate petition for certiorari or
prohibition with the superior court (SC Admin Circular 2. Order to Comment - If the petition is sufficient in
00-2-03) form and substance to justify such process, the
court shall issue an order requiring the
Exceptions: MR may be dispensed with in some cases: respondent(s) to comment on the petition within
1. Where the order is a patent nullity 10 days from receipt of a copy thereof.
2. Where questions raised in the certiorari
proceeding have been duly raised and passed Such order shall be served on the respondents in
upon by the lower court , or are the same as such manner as the court may direct, together
those raised and passed upon in the lower court with a copy of the petition and any annexes
3. Where there is urgent necessity for the resolution thereto. [Rule 65, Sec. 6]
of the question and any further delay would
prejudice the interests of the Government 3. Hearing or Memoranda - After the comment or
4. Where under the circumstances, a MFR would be other pleadings required by the court are filed, or
useless, as where the court had already indicated the time for the filing thereof has expired, the
that it would deny any motion for court may hear the case or require the parties to
reconsideration of its questioned order submit memoranda. [Rule 65, Sec. 8]
5. Where petitioner was deprived of due process
and there is extreme urgency for relief 4. Judgment - If after such hearing or submission of
6. Where, in a criminal case, relief from an order of memoranda or the expiration of the period for
arrest is urgent and granting such relief by trial the filing thereof, the court finds that the
court is improbable allegations of the petition are true, it shall render
7. Where the proceedings in the lower court are a judgment for the relief prayed for or to which the
nullity for lack of due process petitioner is entitled.
8. Where the proceeding was ex parte or in which
the petitioner had no opportunity to object The court, however, may dismiss the petition if it
finds the same to be:
143
a. Patently without merit, for delay, or that the questions raised therein are too
b. Prosecuted manifestly for delay, or unsubstantial to require consideration. (Rule 65, Sec. 8)
c. The questions raised therein are too
unsubstantial to require consideration. [Rule In these cases, the court may award TREBLE COSTS
65, Sec. 8] solidarily against petitioner and counsel, in addition to
administrative sanctions
5. Service and Enforcement of Order or Judgment -
A certified copy of the judgment rendered shall Court may impose, motu proprio, based on res ipsa
be served upon the court, quasi-judicial agency, loquitur, other disciplinary sanctions for patently dilatory
tribunal, corporation, board, officer or person and unmeritorious petitions (AM No. 07-7-12-SC)
concerned in such manner as the court may
direct, and disobedience thereto shall be
punished as contempt.
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
144
QUO WARRANTO In fine, Rule 66 applies to quo warranto IN GENERAL
while election law governs quo warranto against
NATURE SPECIFIED elective officials.
Quo Warranto literally means “by what authority”. AGAINST WHOM MAY THE ACTION BE BROUGHT (Rule
66, Sec. 1)
It is a prerogative writ by which the government can call
upon any person to show by what warrant he holds a 1. A PERSON who USURPS, intrudes into, or
public office or exercises a public franchise. unlawfully holds or exercises a public office,
position, or franchise
When the inquiry is focused on the legal existence of a 2. A PUBLIC OFFICER who does or suffers an act,
body politic, the action is reserved to the State in a which, by provision of law, constitutes a ground
proceeding for quo warranto or any other direct for FORFEITURE OF OFFICE
proceeding. 3. An ASSOCIATION which acts as a corporation
within the Philippines without being legally
Subject Matter: The subject matter of a quo warranto may incorporated or without lawful authority to act
be a public office, franchise, or position.
Actions for quo warranto against corporations with
NOTE: NOTE: Rule 66 deleted an office in a regard to franchises and rights granted to them, as well as
corporation created by authority of law. This falls their dissolution now fall under the jurisdiction of the
under the jurisdiction of the SEC under PD 902-A. RTC (Securities Regulation Code, Sec. 5.2)
DISTINGUISHED FROM QUO WARRANTO IN THE General Rule: The Government, through the Solicitor
OMNIBUS ELECTION CODE General or public prosecutor
1. MANDATORY (Sec. 2); When to commence:
ROC Rule 66 OEC Sec. 253 a. When directed by the President, or
Filed by whom b. When upon complaint or otherwise he has
Solicitor General or Public good reason to believe that any case in Sec. 1
Prosecutor in behalf of the Any voter can be established by proof
Republic; Individual
Where filed 2. DISCRETIONARY (Sec. 3); When to commence:
COMELEC, if against a. This is upon permission of court
election of a Member of b. Bringing such action (ex relatione) at the
Congress, Regional, request and upon the relation of another
By SolGen: RTC Manila, CA or person, PROVIDED:
Provincial or City
SC; Otherwise, RTC with (1) Officer bringing it may require an
Officer;
jurisdiction over territorial indemnity bond
area where respondent (2) Leave of court will have to be obtained
appropriate RTC or
resides, CA or SC
MTC, if against a
municipal or barangay Exception: An individual may commence the action (Sec.
officer 5); PROVIDED:
1. He institutes the action in his own name
Period for filing
a. He does not have to secure the intervention
Within 1 year from ouster, or
Within 10 days after of the Solicitor General or public prosecutor
from the time the right to the
proclamation of results b. No leave of court necessary
position arose
2. HOWEVER, he must claim to be entitled to the
Against whom, grounds
office or position usurped or unlawfully held or
A person, who usurps, exercised by another.
intrudes into or unlawfully a. He must aver and be able to show that he is
holds or exercises a public entitled to the office in dispute. There must
office, position or franchise; be an allegation that respondent is either a
Ineligibility or disloyalty de facto or de jure officer
A public officer, who does or to the Republic
suffers an act which, by
provision of law, constitutes PERIOD FOR PLEADINGS AND PROCEEDINGS MAY BE
a ground for forfeiture of REDUCED (Rule 66, Sec. 8)
office
Period to File: The action must be commenced within 1
year from the date after the cause of such ouster or the
145
right of the petitioner to hold such office or position EXPROPRIATION
arose. (Sec. 11)
NATURE
Laches does not attach and failure to file quo-warranto
proceedings does not operate adversely against a Eminent Domain is the right and authority of the State, as
dismissed government employee where it was the act of sovereign, to take private property for public use upon
responsible government official which contributed in the observance of due process and payment of just
delay of filing of complaint for reinstatement (Cristobal v. compensation.
Melchor).
It is a government’s right to appropriate, in the nature of a
Reduction of Period: The court may reduce the period for compulsory sale to the State, private property for public
filing and for all other proceedings in the action to secure use or purpose.
most expeditious determination of the matters involved
therein, consistent with the rights of the parties. Requisites for the Valid Exercise of the Right
1. There must be due process of law
2. Payment of just compensation
JUDGMENT IN QUO WARRANTO ACTION (Rule 66, Sec. 3. Taking must be for public use
9)
Subject Matter of Expropriation: All properties can be
When respondent is found guilty of usurping, intruding, expropriated, EXCEPT:
or unlawfully holding, judgment rendered: 1. Money (futile; because of just compensation)
1. That such respondent is ousted and altogether 2. Choses in action (conjectural in nature; validity
excluded therefrom and its value)
2. That petitioner or relator, as the case may be,
recover his costs When is Expropriation Proper:
3. May determine the respective rights in and to the 1. When the owner refuses to sell
public office, position, or franchise of all parties 2. When he agrees to sell but an agreement as to the
price cannot be reached.
146
propriety of its exercise in the context of the facts
involved. This ends with either: On RA 8974
1. An order of dismissal, or
2. An order of expropriation On Nov. 7, 2000, Congress enacted RA 8974, a special law
to facilitate the acquisition of right of way, site, or location
Second Stage: Determination of the just compensation for for national government infrastructure projects:
the property sought to be taken.
RULE 67,
RA 8974
NOTE: Multiple appeals is allowed in expropriation. SEC. 2
Aggrieved party may appeal in each stage separately. Only when national
government
expropriates
WHEN PLAINTIFF CAN IMMEDIATELY ENTER INTO Expropriation
APPLICATION property for national
POSSESSION OF THE REAL PROPERTY, IN RELATION in general
government
TO R.A. NO. 8974 infrastructure
projects
Plaintiff shall have the right to take or enter upon Government Government is
possession of the real property upon: FOR WRIT OF is required to required to make
1. Filing of complaint or at any time thereafter, and POSSESSION make immediate payment
after due notice to defendant TO ISSUE preliminary to owner upon filing
4. Making preliminary deposit (Rule 67, Sec. 2) deposit of complaint
Equal to the market
Preliminary deposit: value of the property
as stated in the tax
Provide damages if court finds that the Equal to declaration or
plaintiff has no right to expropriate assessed current relevant
AMOUNT OF
Purposes value of real zonal value of BIR,
Advance payment for just compensation, if PAYMENT OR
property for whichever is higher,
property is finally expropriated DEPOSIT
purposes of and value of
taxation improvements
If Real Property - Equivalent to the assessed and/or structures
value of the property for purposes of using replacement
taxation cost method
Value
If Personal Property – Value shall be
provisionally ascertained and fixed by the Remember the Applicable Rules:
court 1. RA 8974 specifically governs expropriation for
With the authorized government depositary national government infrastructure projects
Where to
Amount is to be held by such bank subject to 2. Sec 19, LGC governs the exercise of the power of
deposit
the orders of the court eminent domain by LGUs through an enabling
Deposit shall be in money ordinance
147
Notice of appearance and 1. Plaintiff not permitted to dismiss or discontinue
Answer to the complaint the proceeding
manifestation
a. EXCEPTION: On such terms as the court
Period to file deems just and equitable, plaintiff may be
Time stated in the summons allowed to dismiss or discontinue
Contents 2. Forecloses any further objections to the right to
Specifically expropriate, including the public purpose of the
Manifestation to the effect designating/identifying same
that he has no objection or the property in which he
defense; claims to have an interest
in and the nature and
Specifically extent of the interest; ASCERTAINMENT OF JUST COMPENSATION (Rule 67,
designating/identifying the Sec. 5)
property in which he ALL his objections and
claims to be interested defenses to the complaint Upon rendition of the Order of Expropriation, the court
or any allegation therein issues an Order of Appointment.
Prohibited
Order of Appointment:
Counterclaim, cross-claim, 1. Court appoints not more than 3 commissioners to
third party complaint in ascertain and report to the court the just
any pleading compensation for the property
Proceedings by Commissioners (Rule 67, Sec. 6) RIGHTS OF PLAINTIFF UPON JUDGMENT AND
1. Commissioners shall first take and subscribe an PAYMENT (Rule 67, Sec. 10)
oath that they will faithfully perform their duties.
Oath shall be filed in court together with other When will the right of plaintiff TO ENTER the property
proceedings. sought to be appropriated or RIGHT TO RETAIN it should
2. Evidence may be introduced by either party he have taken immediate possession thereof accrue?
before the commissioners who are authorized to 1. RIGHT TO RETAIN: Upon filing of complaint,
administer oaths on hearings before them serving notice to defendant, and after depositing
the assessed value of property for taxation
Duties of Commissioners: purposes with authorized government
1. View and examine the property sought to be depositary (Sec. 2)
expropriated and its surroundings, and may
measure the same 2. RIGHT TO ENTER:
a. Due notice to parties to attend must first be a. Upon payment by plaintiff to defendant of
given UNLESS the parties consent to the compensation fixed by judgment, with legal
contrary interest from taking (Sec. 10)
b. After this, each party may argue the case b. After tender to defendant of amount so fixed
and payment of the costs (Sec. 10)
2. They shall assess the consequential damages to
the property not taken and deduct from such the
consequential benefits to be derived by owner EFFECT OF RECORDING OF JUDGMENT
a. In no case shall the consequential benefits
assessed exceed the consequential damages Contents of the Judgment
b. In no case shall the owner be deprived of the 1. Statement of the particular property or interest
actual value of his property taken therein expropriated, with adequate description
2. Nature of the public use or purpose for which it is
Report by Commissioners (Rule 67, Sec. 7) expropriated
Commissioners shall make a full and accurate report to In case of real estate, a certified true copy of such
the court of all their proceedings. judgment shall be recorded in the registry of deeds of the
place in which property is situated. Effect is to vest title.
Such proceeding shall not be effectual until court has
accepted their report and rendered judgment in Title in Expropriation is vested:
accordance with their recommendations. 1. If PERSONAL property, upon payment of just
compensation (Sec. 10)
Report shall be filed within 60 days from date 2. If REAL property, upon payment of just
commissioners were notified of their appointment. Time compensation AND registration of property (Sec.
may be extended by court discretion, 13)
2. Court may:
149
FORECLOSURE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGE 5. Mortgagor even if not owner of the mortgaged
property should be included to satisfy the
NATURE deficiency
150
Confirmation of the sale of mortgaged real property vests 2. Court shall then render judgment against
title in the purchaser including the equity of redemption, defendant for any such balance for which he may
it retroacts to the date of the sale. It cuts off all the rights personally be liable to plaintiff
or interests of the mortgagor and of the mortgagee. 3. Execution may then issue immediately if balance
[Lozame v Amores (1985]]. is all due at the time of rendition of judgment
a. If not, plaintiff shall be entitled to execution
The motion for the confirmation of the sale requires a at such time as the balance remaining
hearing to grant an opportunity to the mortgagor to show becomes due
cause why the sale should not be confirmed [Tiglao v
Botones, 90 Phil 275], as by proof of irregularities therein Instances when court CANNOT render deficiency judgment
or of gross inadequacy of the price. Lack of notice vitiates 1. Recto Law (Art. 1484, par. 3)
the confirmation of the sale. 2. When mortgagor is a non-resident and is not
found in the Philippines
Writ of Possession - Upon the finality of the order of 3. When mortgagor dies, mortgagee may file his
confirmation or upon the expiration of the period of claim with the probate court (Sec. 7, Rule 86)
redemption when allowed by law, the purchaser at the 4. If mortgagor is a third person but not solidarily
auction sale or last redemptioner, if any, shall be entitled liable with debtor
to the possession of the property, unless a third party is No deficiency judgment may be rendered
actually holding the same adversely to the judgment against owner who is not a mortgagor and
obligor. has not assumed personal liability for the
debt
Remedy is ordinary action against debtor
DISPOSITION OF PROCEEDS OF SALE (Rule 68, Sec. 4) 5. In case of a mortgage debt due from the estate of
a deceased mortgagor and the mortgage creditor
1. Amount realized from the foreclosure sale, less availed of the third remedy which is to rely upon
costs of the sale, shall be paid to the person his mortgage alone and foreclosing the same
foreclosing within the statute of limitations (Sec. 7, Rule 86)
152
Parties 1. After the issuance of the order of partition, the
1. The plaintiff is the person who is supposed to be parties will then be asked if they agree to make
a co-owner of the property partition of the property among themselves
2. Defendants are all the co-owners, who are
indispensable parties 2. If they agree, proper instruments of conveyance
3. Creditors or assignees of co-owners may also will be executed to effect the partition.
intervene and object to the partition
3. After the execution of instruments of conveyance,
MATTERS TO ALLEGE IN THE COMPLAINT FOR the court shall confirm the partition through a
PARTITION final order.
Contents of the Complaint: 4. The final order of partition and the instruments
1. Nature and extent of his title of conveyance shall be registered with the
2. Adequate description of the real estate sought to Registry of Deeds where the property is situated.
be partitioned [Rule 69, Sec. 2]
3. Joining of Defendants – All other persons
interested in the property
PARTITION BY COMMISSIONERS; APPOINTMENT OF
COMMISSIONERS; COMMISSIONER’S REPORT; COURT
TWO STAGES IN EVERY ACTION FOR PARTITION ACTION UPON COMMISSIONER’S REPORT
First Stage: Determination of the propriety of partition When proper: If parties fail to agree on the manner of
partition, commissioners are appointed to make partition.
This involves a determination of whether the subject
property is owned in common and whether all the co- How Done: The court appoints not more than 3 competent
owners are made parties in the case. and disinterested commissioners to make the partition.
(Sec. 3)
The order may also require an accounting of rents and
profits recovered by the defendant. This order of partition Oath of the Commissioners: Before entering into their
is appealable. [Miranda v. Court of Appeals (1976)] duties, commissioners must first make an oath that they
will faithfully perform their duties as commissioners.
If not appealed, then the parties may partition the Such oath is to be filed in court. (Sec. 4)
common property in the way they want. If they cannot
agree, then the case goes into the second stage. However, Duties of the Commissioners:
the order of accounting may in the meantime be executed. 1. They shall view and examine real estate, after
[De Mesa v. CA (1994)] due notice to parties to attend at such view and
examination
2. They shall hear the parties as to their preference
Second Stage: Actual partitioning of the subject property in the portion to be set apart to them
3. They shall also determine the comparative value
This is also a complete proceeding and the order or thereof
decision is appealable. 4. They shall set apart the same to the parties in lots
or parcels as will be most advantageous and
When there was a prior partition, the fact that the share equitable considering the improvements,
of each co-heir has not been technically described and the situation, and quality of the parts thereof
title over the whole lot remains uncancelled does not
negate such partition. Assignment of Real Estate to One Party (Sec. 5)
1. General Rule: If the commissioners should
There can be no partition again because there is no more determine that the real estate cannot be divided
common property. [Noceda v. CA (1999)] without prejudice to the interests of the parties,
the court may order that the property be
assigned to one of the parties willing to take the
ORDER OF PARTITION AND PARTITION BY same PROVIDED he pays to the other parties
AGREEMENT such amounts as the commissioners deem
equitable
Order of Partition: The court issues an order of partition
AFTER the trial and the court finds that the plaintiff has a 2. Exception: if one of the parties asks that the
right to partition. The court orders the partition of the property be sold instead of being so assigned,
property. then the court shall ORDER the commissioners to
sell the real estate at public sale under such
The parties may make the partition proper themselves, by conditions and within such time as the court may
agreement: determine
153
Commissioner’s Report: Commissioners shall make a full
accurate report to the court. Contents: Judgment shall state the Judgment shall vest the
1. All proceedings as to the partition, or name of the purchaser or real estate in the
2. The assignment of real estate to one of the purchasers and a definite purchaser(s), making the
parties, or description of the parcels of payment(s) free from the
3. The sale of the same real estate sold to each claims of any parties to the
purchaser action.
Upon filing of Commissioner’s Report:
1. Clerk shall serve copies on all interested parties
with notice that they are allowed to file
objections A certified copy of the judgment shall in either case be
2. Parties may file objections within 10 days upon recorded in the registry of deeds of the place in which the
receipt of notice real estate is situated. [Rule 69, Sec. 11]
154
FORCIBLE ENTRY AND UNLAWFUL for more than 1 has lasted for
DETAINER year more than
one year
NATURE All cases of
forcible entry
Ejectment cases are SUMMARY proceedings intended to and unlawful
provide an expeditious means of protecting actual detainer,
RTC has jurisdiction if value of the
possession of property. irrespective of
property exceeds P20,000 outside
the amount of
Metro Manila; exceeds P50,000
Reason: The owners of property have no authority to use damages or
within Metro Manila.
force and violence to eject alleged usurpers who were in unpaid rentals
prior physical possession of it. They must file the sought to be
MTC has jurisdiction if value of
appropriate action in court and should not take the law in recovered
property does not exceed the above
their own hands. should be
amounts
brought to the
(RA 7691 expanded the jurisdiction
NOTE: The Rule on Summary Procedure applies MTC.
of 1st level courts)
only in cases filed before the MTC However, if not
brought within
DEFINITIONS AND DISTINCTIONS 1 year, RTC has
jurisdiction
FORCIBLY ENTRY UNLAFUL DETAINER
(Detentacion) (Desahucio)
Possession is inceptively HOW TO DETERMINE JURISDICTION
Possession of land by
lawful but it becomes
defendant is unlawful In Accion Interdictal: In the proper Municipal Trial Court
illegal by reason of the
from the beginning as he
termination of his right to
acquires possession by NOTE: Amount of rents and damages claimed
possession of the property
force, intimidation, does not affect the jurisdiction of the MTC
under his contract with the
strategy, threat, or stealth because they are only incidental or accessory to
plaintiff
Demand is jurisdictional if the main action
No previous demand for
the ground is non-payment
defendant to vacate the HOWEVER, municipal courts have no jurisdiction over a
of rentals or failure to
premises is necessary FEUD case involving agricultural tenants. Jurisdiction is
comply with lease contract
with the HLURB
Plaintiff must prove that
he was in prior physical
Plaintiff need not have In accion publiciana and accion reinvindicatoria:
possession of the
been in prior physical 1. RTC has jurisdiction where the assessed value of
premises until he was
possession the property exceeds P20K or, in MM, P50k
deprived thereof by
2. MTC has jurisdiction if the assessed value does
defendant
not exceed said amounts
The 1-year period is
Period is counted from the
generally counted from
date of last letter of
date of actual entry on
demand WHO MAY INSTITUTE THE ACTION AND WHEN;
land
AGAINST WHOM MAINTAINED
The issue centers on who The issue centers on
was in prior possession de whether the defendant’s
Who May Institute Proceedings (Rule 70, Sec. 1)
facto. right to possess has
1. In Forcible Entry:
expired or not.
a. A person deprived of possession of any land
or building by force, intimidation, strategy,
threat, or stealth (FISTS)
DISTINGUISHED FROM ACCION PUBLICIANA, ACCION
REINVINDICATORIA, ACCION INTERDICTAL
2. In Unlawful Detainer:
a. Lessor, vendor, vendee or other person
The Three Kinds of Action for Recovery of Possession
against whom any land or building is
unlawfully withheld
ACCION ACCION ACCION b. Or their legal representatives or assigns
INTERDICTAL PUBLICIANA REINVINDICATORIA
Summary action A plenary Period of Filing: Within ONE (1) year after such unlawful
An action for
for recovery of action for deprivation or withholding of possession. Reckoning
recovery of
physical recovery of points:
ownership, which
possession real right of 1. For forcible entry, it is counted from date of entry
necessarily includes
where the possession or taking of possession
the recovery of
dispossession when 2. For unlawful detainer, it is counted from:
possession
has not lasted dispossession
155
a. Date of last demand to vacate in case of non- 2. If there is no ground for dismissal, court issues
payment of rent or non-compliance with summons
conditions of the lease
b. Date of notice to quit, in case of tacit renewal Answer by defendant (Rule 70, Sec. 6) – Defendant shall
of lease file his answer within 10 days from service of summons
c. Date of revocation of the permit in case of
occupancy on mere tolerance or under Effect of Failure to Answer (Rule 70, Sec. 7) - Court shall
temporary permit render judgment; motu proprio or upon motion
1. Judgment:
Against whom may the action be maintained - Person or a. Warranted by the facts alleged in the
persons unlawfully withholding or depriving of complaint
possession, or any person/s claiming under them: b. Limited to what is prayed for
1. Action of Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer 2. Court may reduce the amount of damages and
(FEUD) may be maintained only against one in attorney’s fees claimed
possession at the commencement of the action a. For being excessive or otherwise
2. Tenant with right of possession may bring action unconscionable
against another tenant b. In the exercise of its discretion
3. Vendor may bring action for ejectment against c. No prejudice to applicability of Sec. 3(c), Rule
vendee upon failure to pay installments 9 if there are 2 or more defendants
4. FEUD lie against the very owner of the property
5. Action may be maintained against government Preliminary Conference (Rule 70, Sec. 8) – Preliminary
officials or agents acting in behalf of the conference shall be held not later than 30 days after filing
government, even if government is not made a of last answer.
party to the action
Submission of Affidavits and Position Papers (Rule 70, Sec.
10) – Affidavits and position papers are to be submitted
PLEADINGS ALLOWED within 10 days from receipt of the Order stating the
matters taken in the preliminary conference.
Pleadings must be VERIFIED. (Rule 70, Sec. 4)
Rendition of Judgment (Rule 70, Sec. 11) – Court shall
What must be alleged in a complaint for forcible entry: render judgment within 30 days after receipt of affidavits
1. That plaintiff was in prior physical possession of and position papers.
the property in litigation until he was deprived
thereof by defendant
2. That the dispossession was through FISTS WHEN DEMAND NECESSARY
3. That the complaint was filed within 1 year from
dispossession Rule 70, Sec. 2 requires a prior written demand against
the lessee before the lessor can proceed against him.
What must be alleged in a complaint for unlawful detainer:
1. That defendant is unlawfully withholding NOTE: This applies ONLY to unlawful detainer
possession from plaintiff because his right to cases.
possess had expired
2. That landlord has made a demand upon tenant to It is only where defendant fails to comply with the
comply with the terms of the contract and to demand within the periods provided by Sec. 2 will his
return the possession of the property, and that possession become unlawful.
the tenant failed to satisfy the demand within 15
or 5 days, in case of buildings Requisites before the lessor can proceed against lessee
3. That the complaint is filed within 1 year from 1. Demand is made by lessor to lessee:
demand a. Demand to pay and vacate; or
b. Demand to comply with conditions of the
Allowed pleadings: lease and to vacate
1. Complaint 2. Lessee fails to comply with the demand:
2. Compulsory Counterclaim pleaded in the answer a. After 15 days in the case of lands; or
3. Cross-claim pleaded in the answer b. After 5 days in case of buildings
4. Answer
NOTE: Demand contemplated by Sec. 2 is jurisdictional
and is always two-fold.
ACTION ON COMPLAINT (Rule 70, Sec. 5)
Demand upon a tenant may be oral. (Jakihaca v. Aquino,
From the examination of allegations in the complaint, the 1990)
court may:
1. Dismiss the case outright on any grounds A person who occupies the land of another at the latter's
mentioned in Rule 16 tolerance or permission, without any contract between
them is necessarily bound by an implied promise that he
156
will vacate upon demand, failing which, an action for
unlawful detainer may be instituted against him. 3. Inferior court cannot adjudicate on the nature of
(Dakudao v. Consolacion, 1983) ownership where relationship of lease has been
sufficiently established
a. UNLESS it be proven that there has been a
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND PRELIMINARY subsequent change in or termination of that
MANDATORY INJUNCTION relationship between parties
Court may grant preliminary injunction in accordance 4. The rule in forcible entry, but not in unlawful
with Rule 58 to prevent defendant from committing detainer, is that a party who can prove prior
further acts of dispossession against plaintiff (Rule 70, possession can recover such possession even
Sec. 15). against the owner himself
a. Hence, it prior possession may be
How done: Possessor may present a motion in the action ascertained in some other way, inferior court
for issuance of preliminary mandatory injunction within 5 cannot intrude into the issue of ownership
days from filing of complaint to restore him in his
possession. Court shall decide the motion within 30 days 5. Where the question of who has prior possession
from filing. hinges on the issue of who the real owner is
a. Inferior court may resolve issue of
Preliminary mandatory injunction shall be available: ownership
1. At the start of the action (Rule 70, Sec. 15) b. But such pronouncement is merely
2. On appeal to the RTC (Sec. 2) upon motion of provisional
plaintiff within 10 days from perfection of appeal c. It does not bar or prejudice an action
between the same parties involving title
Preliminary preventive injunction is available in
either case. Note that Sec. 15 makes the provisions of
Rule 58 applicable to Rule 70. HOW TO STAY IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT
(Rule 70, Sec. 19)
NOTE: Note that there is no distinction as to the type of
ejectment case involved. GENERAL RULE: Judgment of the MTC against defendant
in ejectment cases is immediately executory
The injunction is to restore to plaintiff in possession
1. If the court is satisfied that the defendant’s EXCEPTION: When the following concur:
appeal is frivolous or dilatory, or 1. The defendant perfects his appeal
2. That the appeal of plaintiff is prima facie 2. He files a sufficient supersedeas bond
meritorious To pay the rents, damages, and costs
accruing down to the time judgment
appealed from
RESOLVING DEFENSE OF OWNERSHIP (Rule 70, Sec. 16) The supersedeas bond shall be transmitted
by the MTC, with the other papers, to the RTC
In an action for unlawful detainer, the question of Clerk
possession is primordial while the issue of ownership is 3. He deposits with the appellate court:
generally unessential. The issue of ownership should be a. The amount of rent due from time to time
raised by the affected party in an appropriate action. under the contract, or
b. In the absence of contract, the reasonable
Under BP 129, when in FEUD cases, the defendants raise value of the use and occupation of premises
the question of ownership in his pleadings, and the issue for the preceding month or period
of ownership, the MTCs nevertheless have undoubted determined by judgment on or before the
competence to resolve the issue of ownership ONLY TO 10th day of each succeeding month or period
DETERMINE THE ISSUE OF POSSESSION (Chua v. CA, 1998)
Guidelines laid down by the Court in Refugia, et al. v. CA The judgment of the Regional Trial Court against the
regarding the legislative prescription in Sec. 33 (2). BP defendant shall be immediately executory, without
129: prejudice to a further appeal that may be taken
1. Primal rule is that the principal issue must be therefrom. (Rule 70, Sec. 21)
that of possession
a. Ownership is merely ancillary
b. Issue of ownership may be resolved but only SUMMARY PROCEDURE, PROHIBITED PLEADINGS
for the purpose of determining the issue of
possession GENERAL RULE: All actions for FEUD shall be governed
by the summary procedure of Rule 70, irrespective of the
2. It must sufficiently appear from allegations of amount of damages or unpaid rentals sought to be
complaint that what plaintiff really and primarily recovered
seeks is restoration of possession
157
EXCEPTIONS: CONTEMPT
1. In cases covered by the agricultural tenancy laws
2. When the law otherwise expressly provides NATURE
The real character of the proceedings in contempt cases is Specific acts constituting indirect contempt (Rule 70, Sec.
to be determined by the relief sought or by the dominant 3)
purpose. The proceedings are to be regarded as criminal 1. MISBEHAVIOR of an officer of a court in the
when the purpose is primarily punishment, and civil performance of his official duties or in his official
when the purpose is primarily compensatory or remedial. transactions
2. ABUSE of or any unlawful interference with
processes or proceedings of a court not
DIRECT CONTEMPT constituting direct contempt
3. DISOBEDIENCE or resistance to lawful writ,
For a person to be adjudged guilty of direct contempt, he process, order, or judgment of a court, or any
must commit a “misbehavior in the presence of or so near unlawful intrusion to any real property after
a judge as to interrupt the administration of justice …” being ejected
4. FAILURE to obey subpoena duly served
Grounds for Direct Contempt (Rule 71, Sec. 1) 5. ASSUMING to be an attorney or officer of a court,
1. DISRESPECT toward the court; and acting as such without authority
2. OFFENSIVE personalities toward others 6. IMPROPER conduct tending to impede, obstruct,
3. REFUSAL to be sworn or answer as witness or or degrade administration of justice
subscribe an affidavit when lawfully required to 7. RESCUE, or attempted rescue, of a person or
do so property in custody of an officer
4. MISBEHAVIOR in the presence of or so near a 8. Failure by COUNSEL to inform the court of the
court as to obstruct or interrupt the proceedings death of his client
5. When the counsel WILLFULLY and deliberately
engages in forum shopping Procedural requisites for indirect contempt proceedings:
1. A charge in writing or an order of the court to
Procedure: Summarily adjudged in contempt by such appear and explain
court 2. An opportunity for respondent to comment on
the charge and to appear and explain his conduct
By whom initiated:
1. Generally, civil contempt proceedings should be Two modes of commencing a proceeding for indirect
instituted by an aggrieved party, or his successor, contempt (Rule 70, Sec. 4)
or someone who has pecuniary interest in the 1. Motu proprio by the court against which
right to be protected contempt was committed
2. In criminal contempt proceedings, it is generally a. By order or any other formal charge
held that the State is the real prosecutor requiring respondent to show why he should
not be punished for contempt
Penalties:
2. Independent action in all other cases
OFFENSE PENALTY a. By a charge commenced by a verified petition
If RTC or a court of Fine not exceeding P2,000 with supporting particulars
equivalent or higher rank and/or
Where Charge is to be Filed (Rule 70, Sec. 5)
159
1. General rule: Proceeding for Indirect Contempt Rule 71, Sec. 8 does not apply to tenants who refused or
shall be filed and tried by the court against which failed to pay their rentals to the special administratrix of
the contumacious conduct was committed. the property. The non-payment of rentals, which is a civil
debt, is covered by the constitutional guarantee against
2. Exceptions: imprisonment. [Regalado]
a. If committed against a lower court, it may be
tried by the RTC, regardless of the imposable
penalty; and CONTEMPT AGAINST QUASI-JUDICIAL BODIES (Rule
b. If committed against the SC, it may cause it to 71, Sec. 12)
be investigated by the prosecutor and filed
with the RTC, or for hearing and Rule 71 shall apply to contempt committed against
recommendation where the charge involves persons, entities, bodies, or agencies exercising quasi-
questions of fact judicial functions or have suppletory effect to such rules
as they may have adopted.
Penalties for indirect contempt (Rule 71, Sec. 7)
RTC of the place where the contempt was committed shall
OFFENSE PENALTY have jurisdiction.
Fine not exceeding P30,000
If against RTC, or It is not within the jurisdiction and competence of quasi-
and/or
court of equivalent or judicial bodies to decide indirect contempt cases. The
Imprisonment not exceeding 6
higher rank requirement for a verified petition must also be complied
months
Fine not exceeding P500, and/or with (e.g. DARAB has no power to decide the contempt
If committed against charge filed before it). [Land Bank v Listana (2003)]
Imprisonment not exceeding 1
lower court
month
Offender may also be ordered to Rule 71, Sec. 12 confers contempt powers on all Quasi-
make complete restitution to the Judicial entities or supplements their rules, unless the
party injured by such violation of applicable law provides otherwise.
the property involved or such
If contempt consists amount as may be alleged and Acts or violations against quasi-judicial bodies punishable
in violation of a writ proved. as contempt: where a person, without lawful excuse, fails
of injunction, TRO, or to appear, make oath, give testimony or produce
status quo order If there is nothing more to documents when required to do so by the official or body
return, offender is personally exercising such powers. Other acts or violations cannot be
liable for the restitution of the punished as contempt unless specifically defined in the
money equivalent to the lost governing law as contempt of court or if it authorizes the
thing (Rosario Textile Mills v. CA) quasi-judicial body to punish for contempt, and providing
If committed against Penalty shall depend upon the the corresponding penalty. [People v. Mendoza (1953),
a person or entity provisions of the law which §13, Ch. 3, Bk VII, Admin Code of 1987]
exercising quasi- authorizes penalty for contempt
judicial functions against such persons or entities
160
THE SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS
JURISDICTION VENUE
Personal Property:
1. MTC – if value not more than P300,000 outside Metro Manila, or not Rule 4 applies
more than P400,000 in Metro Manila (Sec. 33, BP129)
2. RTC – value exceeds P300,000 outside Metro Manila, or P400,000 in If the action affects title to or possession of real property
Metro Manila, or if incapable of pecuniary estimation (Sec. 19, BP129) Venue is where the real property involved or a portion thereof is situated
INTERPLEADER
Real Property All other actions—At the election of the plaintiff
1. MTC – assessed value not more than P20,000 outside Metro Manila or 1. Where plaintiff or any of the principal plaintiffs reside; or
not more than P50,000 in Metro Manila (Sec. 33, BP 129) 2. Where defendant or any of the principal defendants resides; or
2. RTC – value exceeds P20,000 if outside Metro Manila, or P50,000 if in 3. In case of an non-resident, where he may be found
Metro Manila, or incapable of pecuniary estimation (Sec. 19, BP129)
Rule 4 applies
The judgment:
1. As may be warranted by the facts alleged in the
complaint and
2. Limited to what is prayed for
163
KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY LAW (PD
1508; RA 7160 as amended) VENUE (RA 7610, Sec. 409)
This Rule shall govern the procedure in actions before the The defendant shall file with the court and serve on the
MeTC, MTC in Cities, MTC and MCTC for payment of plaintiff a duly accomplished and verified Response
money where the value of the claim does not exceed within a non - extendible period of ten (10) days from
P100,000 exclusive of interest and costs. (Sec. 2) receipt of summons (Sec. 11). Attachments:
1. Certified photocopies of documents
This Rule is applicable in all actions which are; (Sec. 4) 2. Affidavits of witnesses
1. Purely civil in nature where the claim or relief 3. Evidence in support
prayed for by the plaintiff is solely for payment or
reimbursement of sum of money, and NOTE: No evidence shall be allowed during
hearing which was not attached or submitted
2. Civil aspect of criminal action, or reserved upon together with the Response.
the filing of the criminal action in court, pursuant
to Rule of 111 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Should the defendant fail to file his response within the
Procedure. required period, the court by itself shall render judgment
as may be warranted by the facts alleged in the Statement
These claims or demands may be; of claim limited to what is prayed for. The court however,
1. For money owned under any of the following; may, in its discretion, reduce the amount of damages for
a. Contract of Lease; being excessive or unconscionable. (Sec. 12)
b. Contract of Loan;
c. Contract of Services; PROHIBITED PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS (Sec. 14)
d. Contract of Sale; or
e. Contract of Mortgage; The following pleadings, motions, and petitions shall not
be allowed in the cases covered by this Rule:
2. For damages arising from any of the following;
a. Fault or negligence; 1. Motion to dismiss the compliant except on the
b. Quasi-contract; or ground of lack of jurisdiction;
c. Contract; 2. Motion for a bill of particulars;
3. Motion for new trial, or for reconsideration of a
3. The enforcement of a barangay amicable judgment, or for reopening of trial;
settlement or an arbitration award involving a 4. Petition for relief from judgment;
money claim covered by this Rule pursuant to 5. Motion for extension of time to file pleadings,
Sec. 417, LGC. affidavits, or any other paper;
6. Memoranda;
7. Petition for certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition
COMMENCEMENT OF SMALL CLAIMS ACTION; against any interlocutory order issued by the
RESPONSE (Sec. 5) court;
8. Motion to declare the defendant in default;
How commenced: By filing with the court an accomplished 9. Dilatory motions for postponement;
and verified STATEMENT OF CLAIM in duplicate 10. Reply;
11. Third-party complaints; and
Attachments to the Statement of Claim: 12. Interventions.
1. Certification of Non-forum Shopping
2. Two (2) duly certified photocopies of the APPEARANCES
actionable document/s subject of the claim
3. Affidavits of witnesses and other evidence to The parties shall appear at the designated date of hearing
support the claim personally or through a representative authorized under
a Special Power of Attorney to:
NOTE: No evidence shall be allowed during the 1. Enter into an amicable settlement,
hearing which was not attached to or submitted 2. Submit of Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR) and
together with the Claim. UNLESS good cause is shown 3. Enter into stipulations or admissions of facts and
for admission of additional evidence. of documentary exhibits (Sec. 16)
No formal pleading, other than the Statement of Claim, is No attorney shall appear in behalf of or represent a party
necessary to initiate a small claims action. at the hearing, unless the attorney is the plaintiff or
defendant. (Sec. 17)
After examination of allegations of the Claim, the court
may dismiss outright the case for any of the grounds Failure to appear:
apparent for the dismissal of a civil action. (Sec. 9) 1. If plaintiff fails to appear – it shall be a cause for
dismissal without prejudice. Defendant present
165
shall be entitled to judgment on permissive EFFICIENT USE OF PAPER RULE (A.M. No. 11-
counterclaim. 9-4-SC)
2. If defendant fails to appear – same effect as FORMAT AND STYLE
failure to file Response.
All pleadings, motions and similar papers intended for the
HEARING; DUTY OF THE JUDGE court and quasi-judicial body’s consideration and action
(court-bound papers) shall:
At the beginning of the court session, the judge shall read 1. Be written in single space with one-and-a –half
aloud a short statement explaining the nature, purpose space between paragraphs,
and the rule of procedure of small claims cases. (Sec. 20) 2. Use an easily readable font style of the party’s
choice, of 14-size font, and on a 13 –inch by 8.5-
At the hearing, the judge shall conduct JDR through inch white bond paper
mediation, conciliation, early neutral evaluation, or any
other mode of JDR. (Sec. 21) All decisions, resolutions and orders issued by courts and
quasi-judicial bodies under the administrative
If JDR fails and the parties agree in writing that the supervision of the Supreme Court shall comply with these
hearing of the case shall be presided over by the judge requirements. Similarly covered are the reports
who conducted the JDR, the hearing shall so proceed in an submitted to the courts and transcripts of stenographic
informal and expeditious manner and terminated within notes.
one (1) day. (Sec. 22)
MARGINS AND PRINTS
Absent such agreement
1. In case of a multi-sala court , the case shall, on the The parties shall maintain the following margins on all
same day, be transmitted to the Office of the court-bound papers:
Clerk of Court for immediate referral by the 1. Left hand margin of 1.5 inches from the edge;
Executive Judge to the pairing judge for hearing 2. Upper margin of 1.2 inches from the edge;
and decision within five (5) working days from 3. Right hand margin of 1.0 inch from the edge;
referral; and 4. Lower margin of 1.0 inch from the edge.
2. In case of single sala court, the pairing judge shall
hear and decide the case in the court of origin Every page must be consecutively numbered.
within five (5) working days from referral by the
JDR judge. COPIES TO BE FILED
FINALITY OF JUDGMENT Unless otherwise directed by the court, the number of
court- bound papers that a party is required or desires to
After the hearing, the court shall render its decision on file shall be as follows:
the same day, based on the facts established by the
evidence. In the Supreme Court,
1. One original (properly marked) and 4 copies
The decision shall immediately be entered by the Clerk of 2. Two sets of annexes, one attached to the original
Court in the court docket for civil cases and a copy thereof and an extra copy
forthwith served on the parties.
If the case is referred to the Court En Banc:
The decision shall be final and unappealable. (Sec. 23) a. Parties shall file 10 additional copies.
b. For the En Banc, the parties need to submit
only 2 sets of annexes, one attached to the
original and an extra copy.
In other courts,
1. One original (properly marked)
2. With the stated annexes attached to it.
APPLICABILITY
END OF CIVPRO!!!
167