MIDYEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: PASAY Date of Review: NOVEMBER 18 - 22, 2019
Rating Period: JUNE 2019 - MARCH 2020 APRIL ___, 2020

Mid-year Review/Rating Mid-Year

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA
MOV Performance Target Ratee Rater Review
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of and/or inter-observer agreement form about knowledge
of content within and across curriculum teaching areas 4
Services and content within 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed highlighting Showed knowledge of content and its
Pedagogy and across integration of content knowledge within and across integration within and across subject areas
curriculum subject areas as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6
teaching areas. 3. Instructional materials hihglighting mastery of
content and its integration in other subject areas
August 2018 4. Performance tasks/test materials(s) highlighting 0.000
- April 2019 integration of content knowledge within and across Efficiency
subject areas
5. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) 4
Submitted 3 lessons using MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of the other given MOV

Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education of teaching and/or inter-observer agreement form about teaching
strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy 4
Services strtegies that and numeracy skills Facilitated using different teaching
enhance learner 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed highlighting strategies that promote reading, writing
achievement in learner-centerd strategies that promote literacy and/or and/or numeracy skills as shown in MOV 1
literacy and numeracy skills
with a rating of 6
3. Instructional materials hihglighting learner-centered
numeracy skills August 2018 strategies that promote literacy and/or numeracy skills
0.000
- April 2019 4. Performance tasks/test materials(s) used in teaching Efficiency
22.5% 5. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
4
Submitted 3 learner-centered lessons as
evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported
by any 1 of the other MOV given
Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education range of and/or inter-observer agreement form about teaching
strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as 4
Services teaching well as other higher-order thinking skills Used different teaching strategies that
strategies to 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed highlighting develop critical
develop critical different teaching strategies that develop critical and and creative thinking and/or other HOTS as
and creative thinking and/or other HOTS shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6
3. Instructional materials hihglighting different etaching
creative thinking, strategies that develop critical and creative thinking
as August 2018 and/or other HOTS 0.000
well as other - April 2019 4. Performance tasks/test materials(s) used in
higherorder demonstration teaching Efficiency
5. Results of assessment used in teaching
thinking skills. 6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) 4
Submitted 3 lessons as evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by
any 1 of the other given MOV

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review/Rating Mid-Year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA
MOV Performance Target Ratee Rater Review
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education Environment classroom and/or inter-observer agreement form about managing
classroom structure that engages learners in various 5
Services and structure to activities Used classroom management strategies
Diversity of engage learners, 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting various that engage learners in activities/tasks as
Learners individually or in classroom management strategies that engage shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7
groups, in learners in activities/tasks in different physical learning
environments
meaningful 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
exploration,
discovery and 0.000
August 2018
hands-on Efficiency
- April 2019
activities within a 4
range of physical Submitted 3 lessons supported by MOV 1
learning and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
environments.

Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or Quality
Education learner behavior inter-observer agreement form about teacher
management of learner behavior using following 4
Services constructively by startegies: Applied teacher management strategies of
applying positive 1. Providng motivation learner behavior that promote positive and
and non-violent 2. Praising the learners/Giving positive feedback non-violent discipline as shown in MOV
discipline to 3. Setting house rules/guidelines submitted with a rating of 6
22.5% 4. Ensuring learners' active participation
ensure learning 5. Allowing learners to express their ideas/opinions
focused August 2018 0.000
6. Giving equal opportunities to learners
environments. - April 2019 7. Encouraging learners to ask questions
8. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Efficiency
4
Submitted at least 4 of the given strategies
as observed in 3 lessons.

Timeliness
Basic 6. Used 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education differentiated, and/or inter-observer agreement form about using
differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning 4
Services developmentally experiences Applied differentlated teaching strategies to
appropriate 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed highlighting address learner diversity as shown in MOV
learning differentiation in content, product, process, learning 1 with a rating of 6
experiences to environement or others according to learners' gender,
needs strengths, interests and experiences
address learners' 3. Instructional materials hihglighting differentiation in
gender, needs, August 2018 content, product, process, learning environement or
0.000
strengths, - April 2019 others according to learners' gender, needs strengths, Efficiency
intetrests, and interests and experiences 4
4. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
experiences. Submitted 3 differentiated teaching
strategies in at least 2 lessons as
evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any
1 of the other acceptable MOV

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review/Rating Mid-Year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA
MOV Performance Target Ratee Rater Review
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 3. 7. Planned, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education Curriculum managed, and and/or inter-observer agreement form about using
developmentally sequenced teaching and learning 4
Services and implemented process Planned and implemented developmentally
Planning developmentally 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed highlighting sequenced teaching and learning processs
sequenced developmentally sequenced instruction that meet as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6
teaching and curriculum goals and varied teaching contexts
3. Instructional materials used to implement
learning developmentally sequenced teaching and learning
processes to process to meet curriuclum requirements and varied
0.000
meet curriculum August 2018 teaching contexts Efficiency
requirements - April 2019 4. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) 4
and varied Submitted 3 developmentally-sequenced
teaching teaching and learning process as evidently
contents. shown in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of
the other given MOV

Timeliness
Basic 8. Participated in 1. Personal notes of teachers on LACs/FGDs/meetings Quality
Education collegial with proof of attendance
2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of teacher and 5
Services discussions that learner feedback to enrich teaching practice with proof Consistently participated in LACs//FGDs/
use teacher and of attendance meetings to discuss teacher/learner
learner feedback 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) feedback to enrich instruction as shown in
to enrich the MOV submitted
teaching
practice. August 2018 22.5% 0.000
- April 2019
Efficiency
5
Participated in at least 4 LACs/FGDs/
meetings as evidently shown in any 1 of
the given MOV.

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education developed, and/or inter-observer agreement form about using
appropriate teaching and learning resources, including 5
Services organized and ICT Developed and used varied teaching and
used appropriate Examples: learning resources, including ICT, to
teaching and - Activity sheets/task address learning goals as shown in MOV 1
learning - PowerPoint presentations with a rating of 7
- Video clips
resources, - Module
including ICT, to August 2018 - SIMs-Strategic Intervention Materials 0.000
address learning - Others Efficiency
- April 2019 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with appropriate
goals. 5
instructional materials appended
3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Submitted at least 4 varied teaching and
learning resources, including ICT, as
evidently shown in MOV 1 and supported
by any 1 of the acceptable MOV

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review/Rating Mid-Year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA
MOV Performance Target Ratee Rater Review
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education Assessment selected, and/or inter-observer agreement form about using
diagnostic, formative and summative assessment 5
Services and organized and strategies Designed, selected, organized and used
Reporting used diagnostic, 2. Prepared lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting diagnostic, forrmative, and summative
forrmative, and appropriate use of formative assessment strategies assessment strategies consistent with
summative 3. Developed diagnostic tests: (a) with TOS reviewed curriculum requirement as shown in MOV 1
by superior; (b) with sample accomplished
assessment questionnaire/answer sheets with a rating of 7
strategies 4. Developed summative tests: (a) with TOS reviewed
consistent with August 2018 by superior; (b) with sample accomplished 0.000
curriculum - April 2019 questionnaire/answer sheets
5. Developed performance tasks: (a) with rubrics Efficiency
requirements. reviewed by superiror; (b) with sample accomplished
rubrics 4
6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Submitted 3 varied assessment tools as
evidently shown in any 1 of the acceptable
MOV

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored 1. Compilation of a learner's writen work with summary Quality
Education and evaluated of results and with signature of parents
2. Formative/summative assessment tools with TOS 4
Services learner progress and frequency of errors with identified least mastered Frequently monitored and evaluated
and achievement skills learner progress and achievement using
using learner 3. Class records/grading sheets learner attainment data as shown in the
attainment data. 4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs showing index of
MOV submitted
mastery
5. Others (Please speficy and provide annotations)
Efficiency
August 2018
22.5% 4 0.000
- April 2019
Submitted a combination of 3 of the
acceptable MOV

Timeliness
5
Submitted MOV were distributed across 4
quarters

Basic 12. 1. At least 3 samples of corrected test papers of the Quality

Education Communicated same 3 learners in the same learning area with parents'
or guardians signature and date of receipt 5
Services promptly and 2. Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent-Teacher Consistently showed prompt and clear
clearly the conferences in all quarters with proof of communication of the learners' needs,
learners' needs, parents'/guardians' attendance progress and achievement to key
progress and 3. Report cards with parent's or guardians supported by
stakeholders, including parents/guardians
minutes of meeting
achievement to 4. Communication with parents/guardians using as shown in the MOV submitted
key various modalities
stakeholders, August 2018 5. Anectodal record showing entries per quarter Efficiency
including 6. Other documents showing learners' needs, progress 0.000
- April 2019 and achievement submitted to other stakeholders 4
parents/
Submitted a combination of 3 of the
guardians. acceptable MOV

Timeliness
4
Submitted MOV were distributed across 3
quarters
 Mid-year Review/Rating Mid-Year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline MOV Performance Target Ratee Rater Review
per KRA
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 5. Plus 13. Performed August 2018 1. Certificate of Recognition or Participation Quality
Education Factor various related - April 2019 2. Certificate of Training
3. Certificate of Speakership 5
Services works/activities 4. Committee of involvement Consistently performed various related
that contribute to 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities works/activities that contribute to the
the teaching- 6. Book or Journal Authroship/Co- teaching-learning process
learning process authorship/Contributorship
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship 0.000
10% 8. Coaching and mentoring learners in competitions Efficiency
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-service teachers 4
10. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
Submitted 3 different kinds of acceptable
MOV

Timeliness
MIDYEAR RATING 0.000

CORAZON B. SALVADOR
Rater Ratee Approving Authority