Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Certificate
This is to certify that the Design Engineering – 2A (215001) Project Report entitled
“DESIGN OF ROAD INTERSECTION FOR CONTROLLING TRAFFIC ” has been
carried out by Bharatiya raj a. (170610106003), Gamit hiteshkumar j. (170610106022),
Patel rutukumar y. (170610106044), Singh rohit c. (170610106054), Vagda Sachin v.
(170610106060) . under my guidance in partial fulfillment of the degree of Bachelor of
Engineering in Civil Engineering (5th Semester) of Gujarat Technological University,
Ahmadabad during the academic year 2019-2020.
Certificate
This is to certify that the Design Engineering – 1B (2140002) Project Report entitled
“DESIGN OF ROAD INTERSECTION FOR CONTROLLING TRAFFIC” has been
carried out by Bharatiya raj a. (170610106003), Gamit hiteshkumar j. (170610106022),
Patel rutukumar y. (170610106044), Singh rohit c. (170610106054), Vagda Sachin v.
(170610106060). under my guidance in partial fulfillment of the degree of Bachelor of
Engineering in Civil Engineering (5th Semester) of Gujarat Technological University,
Ahmadabad during the academic year 2019-2020.
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to our respected guidence Prof.
R.K.RATHOD SIR ; Assistant Professor in Civil Engineering whose
encouragement, continuous guidance, helpful nature and new suggestions and
ideas was valuable for accomplishment of this work. Also their advice and kind
support are greatly appreciated.
We express our sincere gratitude and thankful to all those persons who
inspirer of their busy schedule have given their valuable and precious time
assisting us in compilation of the information and giving us right direction to
complete this project in present condition.
Title Page 1
ODSA Certificate 2
College Certificate 3
Acknowledgement 4
Abstract 5
Contents 6
List of Table 8
List of Figure 9
List of Abbreviations 10
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Chapter 4 CONCLUSION
Conclusion
Log Table
REFERENCES
Log table 1
Log table 2
Log table 3
Log table 4
Log table 5
Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Road Intersection is where two or more roads meet and or are the
points of potential vehicle conflict. They are critical element of a
road section. They are normally a major bottleneck to smooth flow
of traffic and a major accident spot. The general principles of design
in both rural and urban areas are the same. The dangers to
pedestrians and riders of two-wheeled vehicles are also great at
intersections.
T
Y
SCISSOR
CROSS
STAGGERED
SKEWED
MULTIWAY
Type of intersections and Choice
From a design aspect, intersections can also be divided according to whether they
are uncontrolled, priority (stop give way), space sharing (round about), time-
sharing (traffic signal controlled), or grade separated (interchanges). The four
categories given in IRC code (special publication, 1994) are:
Uncontrolled at-grade: These are the intersections between any two roads with
relatively lower volume of traffic and traffic of neither road has precedence over
the other.
Priority control: There is theoretically no delay occurring on the major road and
vehicles on the minor road are controlled by “GIVE WAY” or “STOP” signs.
Time separated /Signalized intersection at grade: These are widely seen road
intersection with traffic signals.
2 AEIOU Summery
AEIOU Summary is the summary of Activities, Interactions, Environment
Objects and Users. From summary we can easily conclude the whole situation
Of Aroma circle
2.2.1 Activity
● A – Activities → Through the “Activity Canvas” we were able to find out the activities carried
out in the aroma circle by the labour and the other person.
Accident
Traffic jam
Person crossing road
Road repairing
Vendors
High speed vehicles
2.2.2 Environment
●E – Environment → Through the “Environment Canvas” we were able to sort out the normal
Atmosphere of the Aroma circle and also some specific environment of The near area which are
usually not seen.
Traffic noise
Dusty
cloudy
2.2.3 Interaction
● I – Interactions → Through the “Interaction Canvas” we have tried to find out the
interaction taking place during the working and non-working hours of Aroma circle.
➢ pedestrian
➢
local vendors
2 . 2 . 4 Objects
● O – Objects → Through the “Object Canvas” we have almost tried to find out which all
Objects, components are used in the intersection of road.
C.C.T.V. CAMERA
DIVIDER
ZEBRA CROSSING
2 . 2 . 5 Users
➢
Public
➢
Pedestrian
➢
Transporter
➢ public
➢ Beggars
Mind mapping
● Empathy canvas consists user, stakeholders, activities, happy story, sad story.
Ideation Canvas
By the help of the Ideation Canvas, we were able to sort out the targeted person, activities
performed at the Aroma circle, several situations which might be seen at the Aroma circle
and the props at the palanpur.
People
Public
Transporters
Vendors
Engineers
Driver
Pedestrian
police
Activities mentioned in Ideation Canvas
❖
Using mobile while driving
❖
Accident
❖
Vendors selling fruits
❖
Moving animals
❖
Traffic police
Situation/Context /Location
Props/possible solutions
Product Development Canvas
Final Problem
After ideation canvas we find our problem about higher construction cost. We want
to design a better way to reduce cost of construction, Because of this we helpful to
government and people to make any at economical cost.
Purpose
Traffic solution
Control traffic
➢
People
• This are the customers or else this are the daily user of Aroma circle.
Public
Transporter
Visitor
Passengers
Employee
Student
Component
● in this section, the list of
the components is listed which
would be mainly used to develop
the product.
Product functions
● In this section, how will the product will work is stated.
SIGNALS
C.C.T.V. CAMERA
Product experience
In this section, by the help of our product what will be the key benefits to the
customers are stated.
Costumer revalidation
NO TRAFFIC JAM
COMPLEX SOLUTION
Redesign
Product Development Canvas
3. Problems and Analysis
• Deficient Communication
The lack of a central data system results to delayed and inconsistent sharing of
information and reports. This leads to subcontractors, contractors, and owners not
having a common understanding of the project’s state at any given time.
• Non-Universality of Information
when a different team carries over work to a different team for the next process and
when a problem comes up arising from the precious process, the construction
project manager may have a hard time understanding how to proceed. For example,
the procurement team deals with complicated contracts and when a problem with
the contracts arises while in the middle of construction, it may confuse the CPM
(construction project management) lead.
Connection Gaps
planning spans a lot of aspects; it includes high-end preparation and daily tasks. If daily
work does not align with the day’s goal, schedulers should be notified but often are not.
This system ends in delays due the absence of real-time updating of task priorities.
➢
Safety Issues
Another aspect to look at is safety management practices. Work injuries can set project
schedule back by one week or even more and may cause budget overspending to
compensate for its outcomes. Investing in strong safety management programs
ultimately reduce injury rates thereby decreasing schedule and budget overruns and
ultimately improving project ROI and company reputation.
❖
Final Problem
After ideation canvas we find our problem about higher construction cost. We want
to design a better way to reduce cost of construction, Because of this we helpful to
government and people to make any at economical cost.
• ANALYSIS OF SOLID SLAB BRIDGE
Foundation footing
Pcc =0.15m
Step-1=0.60M
Step-2=0.60M
Step-3=0.60M
Pier height=16M
Foundation length=13M, width=6.50M
Abutment to pier=10.25M
Pier to pier= 10M
Slab thickness=0.85CM
=0.85CM
ATOCAD DRAWING
Chapter 3
PRE-DESIGN
➢
Purpose
• Better service
• Guide vehicle to their respective directions
➢
Tools/Methods/Theories/Application Process involved
• 2 Way
• 3 Way
• Simple intersection
• 5 Way
requirement
• Mathematical equation
• Auto-cad basic
Person’
Questio s
ns
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
1 Do You Yes Yes NO Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NO Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
have
knowledge
about rain
Solid slab
bridge
2 Do you have Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes NO Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No
idea about
Solid slab
bridge
3 Is happened Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes NO Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes
near about
your
Village!
4 Do you have Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
experience
about
This type of
work!
5 Economical Ye Yes NO Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NO Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
ly design s
properly?
6 Is there any Y Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NO Yes Yes No Yes Ye Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
effect on es s
environment
during
construction
?
7 Is N No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes NO Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes
government o
department
work
properly?
31|P a g e
• Result table
Table no: 2 (Result table)
no.
32|P a g e
• Conclusion
2 Domain 3 hours
Identification
& observation Prof.
R.K.RATHOD
3 AEIOU 5 hours
Canvas Prof.
R.K.RATHOD
4 AEIOU 2 hours
Canvas Prof.
R.K.RATHOD
5 Mind Mapping 4 hours Prof.
R.K.RATHOD
6 Empathy 3 hours Prof.
Canvas R.K.RATHOD
7 Empathy 2 hours
32|P age
Prof.
Canvas R.K.RATHOD
8 Ideation 5 hours Prof.
Canvas R.K.RATHOD
9 Product 6 hours Prof.
Development R.K.RATHOD
Canvas
LOG TABLE: 03
2 Domain 3 hours
Identification Prof.
& observation R.K.RATHOD
3 AEIOU 5 hours
Canvas Prof.
R.K.RATHOD
4 AEIOU 2 hours
Canvas Prof.
R.K.RATHOD
5 Mind Mapping 4 hours
Prof.
R.K.RATHOD
6 Empathy 3 hours
Canvas Prof.
R.K.RATHOD
7 Empathy 2 hours
Canvas Prof.
32|P age R.K.RATHOD
8 Ideation 5 hours
Canvas Prof.
R.K.RATHOD
9 Product 6 hours
Development Prof.
Canvas R.K.RATHOD
LOG TABLE: 04
2 Domain 3 hours
Identification Prof.
& observation R.K.RATHOD
3 AEIOU 5 hours
Canvas Prof.
R.K.RATHOD
4 AEIOU 2 hours
Canvas Prof.
R.K.RATHOD
5 Mind 4 hours
Mapping Prof.
R.K.RATHOD
6 Empathy 3 hours
Canvas Prof.
R.K.RATHOD
7 Empathy 2 hours
Canvas Prof.
R.K.RATHOD
32|P age
Prof.
8 Ideation 5 hours R.K.RATHOD
Canvas
Prof.
9 Product 6 hours R.K.RATHOD
Development
Canvas
LOG TABLE: 05
2 Domain 3 hours
Identification
Prof.
& observation R.K.RATHOD SIR
3 AEIOU 5 hours
Prof.
Canvas R.K.RATHOD SIR
4 AEIOU 2 hours
Prof.
Canvas R.K.RATHOD SIR
5 Mind Mapping 4 hours
Prof.
R.K.RATHOD SIR
Prof.
6 Empathy 3 hours R.K.RATHOD SIR
Canvas
Prof.
7 Empathy 2 hours R.K.RATHOD SIR
Canvas
32|P a g e
8 Ideation 5 hours R.K.RATHOD SIR
Canvas
9 Product 6 hours
Development R.K.RATHOD SIR
Canvas
Reference:
• Google
• Lecturer
• Research paper
• Faculties
• Civil engineers
• Books
Appendix
Appendix 1: AEIOU canvas
32|P a g e
Appendix 1.1: mind mapping
32|P a g e
Appendix 2: Empathy mapping canvas
Appendix 3: Ideation canvas
32|P a g e
Appendix 4: product development canvas
32|P a g e
Appendix 5: prototype