NLOG GS PUB 1580 VGEXP-INT3-GG-RPT-0001.00 P11-06 Geological FWR

Document Title P11-06 GEOLOGICAL FINAL WELL REPORT
Document Number VGEXP-INT3-GG-RPT-0001.00
Copy Number
Petro-Canada Netherlands B.V.
Document / Rev No: VGEXP-INT3-GG-RPT-0001.00
P11-06 GEOLOGICAL FINAL WELL REPORT Revision Date: February 2009

Page No: Page 2 of 93
1. INDEX
1. INDEX .........................................................................................................................2
2. AUTHORISATION ......................................................................................................5
3. RECORD OF CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS ISSUE .................................................5
4. GENERAL WELL INFORMATION .............................................................................6
5. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................7
6. GEOLOGICAL SUMMARY.........................................................................................9
6.1 Geological Setting and prognosis..............................................................................9

6.2 Well Objectives........................................................................................................10
6.3 Summary of Well Results ........................................................................................11
6.4 Post-well studies .....................................................................................................15
7. WELL OPERATIONS ...............................................................................................17
7.1 Drilling Operations Overview...................................................................................17

7.2 Summary by hole section ........................................................................................18
7.2.1 Rig Move in 18
7.2.2 30” Conductor 19
7.2.3 17.1/2” Hole / 13.3/8” Casing 19
7.2.4 12.1/4” Hole / Logging / 9.5/8” Casing 21
7.2.5 8 ½” Hole / Logging / 7” Liner 22
7.2.6 Temporary Suspension 25
7.2.7 Demobilise 26
7.3 Hole / Casing Summary ..........................................................................................28
7.4 Drilling / Operational inefficiencies related to Geology............................................28
8. LITHOSTRATIGRAPHY SUMMARY........................................................................29
8.1 Formation Tops .......................................................................................................29

8.2 Formation Summary................................................................................................30
9. HYDROCARBON INDICATIONS .............................................................................43
9.1 Oil shows.................................................................................................................43

9.2 Recorded gas ..........................................................................................................45
10. PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE ENVIRONMENT ..............................................48


10.1 Formation pressure .................................................................................................48

10.2 Fracture pressure ....................................................................................................49
10.3 Temperature............................................................................................................49
11. WELL DATA ACQUISITION SERVICES..................................................................51
11.1 Mudlogging Services ...............................................................................................51

11.2 MWD/ LWD .............................................................................................................53
11.3 Open hole Wireline Logging ....................................................................................56
11.3.1 12 ¼” hole section logging summary 59
11.3.2 8 ½” hole section logging summary 60
11.4 Cased Hole Wireline Logging..................................................................................67
12. GEOLOGICAL SAMPLES ........................................................................................68
12.1 Drill Cuttings ............................................................................................................68

12.2 Biostratigraphy Samples .........................................................................................69
12.3 Cores.......................................................................................................................69
12.4 Sidewall Cores ........................................................................................................69
12.5 Formation Fluid Sample ..........................................................................................73
12.6 Drilling mud samples ...............................................................................................73
13. FIGURES ..................................................................................................................74
13.1 Figure 1: Location Map...........................................................................................74

13.2 Figure 2: Seismic Traverse across P11-06 well path .............................................74
13.3 Figure 3: Base Vlieland Claystone depth structure map ........................................74
13.4 Figure 4: Geo-seismic traverse A-A’ (In Line 6820) ...............................................74
13.5 Figure 5: Geo-seismic traverse B-B’ (Cross Line 755)...........................................74
14. APPENDIX A: CUTTINGS DESCRIPTION TABLE ................................................75
15. APPENDIX B: SAMPLE MANIFESTS.....................................................................76
16. APPENDIX C: DRILL GAS PIXLER PLOTS (INTERNATIONAL LOGGING) ........77
17. APPENDIX D: DIRECTIONAL SURVEY LISTING (BAKER HUGHES INTEQ) .....79
18. APPENDIX E: LWD REPORT (BAKER HUGHES INTEQ).....................................80
19. APPENDIX F: FORMATION PRESSURE SUMMARY (RUN 2B)...........................81
20. APPENDIX G: FORMATION SAMPLING SUMMARY (RUNS 2D & 2F)................82
21. APPENDIX H: WIRELINE LOGGING SUMMARY (RUN 1A) .................................83


22. APPENDIX I: WIRELINE QC REPORT (GAIA EARTH SCIENCES)......................84
23. APPENDIX J: BOREHOLE SEISMIC QC REPORT, RUN 2D (RPS ENERGY) .....85
24. APPENDIX K: VELOCITY SURVEY LISTING (SCHLUMBERGER) ......................86
25. APPENDIX L: PETROPHYSICAL INTERPRETATION...........................................87
26. APPENDIX M: POST WELL STUDIES – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................88
26.1 SWC Analyses – Conventional and Petrographic Analyses (Corex) ......................88

26.2 PVT Formation Fluid Analyses................................................................................91
26.3 Geochemistry ..........................................................................................................91
26.4 Borehole Seismic Processing..................................................................................92
REVISION STATUS APPROVAL

Rev Date Description Originator Reviewed Approved
0 Feb 2009 First Issue ME SC MR
NOTES: 1. Text amended in the latest revision is indicated by shading the amended text
2. This document will be updated only if it is a CONTROLLED document
3. Any required changes or clarification should be addressed to the originator indicated

4. GENERAL WELL INFORMATION
Block : P11b, Dutch Sector of Southern North Sea

License Operator : Petro-Canada Netherlands B.V.
License Partners : PCNL: 50.00%; EBN: 50.00%
Well Name : P11-06
Slot Number : N/A
Well Type : Exploration
Target Formation : Volpriehausen Sst
Drilling Contractor : Transocean
Drilling Rig : GSF Labrador
On Contract : 08:30 hours, 26th of March 2008
Spud date (below conductor) : 06:30 hours, 30th of March 2008
TD date : 10:00 hours, 12th of April 2008
End of Contract : 18:50 hours, 23rd of April 2008
Total days : 28.43 days
Surface Location
Latitude / Longitude (ED50) : 52° 21’ 46.964” N / 03° 24’ 27.645” E
Grid (UTM Zone 31 N CM 3° E) : 5 801 617.91mN / 527 761.71mE
TD Location
Latitude / Longitude (ED50) : 52° 21’ 46.971” N / 03° 24’ 27.443” E
Grid (UTM Zone 31 N CM 3° E) : 5 801 618.12 mN / 527 757.89 mE
Water depth : 34.0 m
RT above MSL : 40.00 m
Total Depth : 1892m MDBRT / 1891.59m TVDBRT
Casing summary :
30” at 145.93m MDBRT 145.93m TVDBRT
13.⅜” at 794m MDBRT 794m TVDBRT
9.⅝” at 1,703m MDBRT 1,703m TVDBRT
7” at 1888m MDBRT 1,888m TVDBRT
Well Status : Suspended with seabed protection dome

5. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The exploration well P11-06 was drilled by Petro-Canada in license block P11b in the
Dutch Sector of the North Sea to test the Van Ghent prospect which is located
approximately 55 km northwest of The Hague. The well objective was to drill and
evaluate the Volpriehausen Formation reservoir for hydrocarbons. The well was drilled
according to license agreement with EBN (PCNL 50.00% and EBN 50.00%).
Pre drill geophysical studies identified the Van Ghent structure as having a high
probability of being hydrocarbon bearing with indications of a gas cap overlying a thin oil
column. The reservoir section of the Van Ghent structure is analogous to the section
penetrated in well P10-05 (Van Brakel – gas discovery) and P11-03 (De Ruyter – oil and
gas discovery).
The Transocean “GSF Labrador” jack-up rig was utilised to drill the well. The rig was on
contract from 08:30 hrs on 26th March 2008 and was positioned at the final approved
surface location, 1.93m from the proposed location.
The well was drilled vertically with a maximum inclination of 2 degrees and had a 30”,
13.3/8” and 9.5/8” casing and 7” liner scheme.
The Volpriehausen reservoir was drilled from 1702m to 1801m MDBRT in a crestal
position on the Van Ghent structure. Top reservoir was recorded 12m deep to prognosis
and top Lower Buntsandstein was recorded 2m deep to prognosis. The original TD within
the Lower Buntsandstein was extended by 30m to drill into the underlying Hewett
Formation to test for presence of hydrocarbons. Final TD was 1892m MDBRT, 21m MD
into the Hewett Formation.
The reservoir section was comprehensively logged with eight logging runs:
• Run #2A – DSI-HRLA-TLD-MCFL-CAL-CNL-HNGS-ACTS-SP-ECRD

• Run #2B – FMI-GPIT-GR-ACTS-LEHQT
• Run #2C – MDT-GR-ACTS-ECRD (Pressures)
• Run #2D – MDT-GR-ACTS-ECRD (Samples)
• Run #2E – VSI-GR-ACTS-LEHQT
• Run #2F – MDT-GR-ACTS-ECRD (Samples)
• Run #2G – MSCT-GR-ACTS-LEHQT

• Run #2H – CBL-VDL-GR-CCL
The lack of good oil shows in the cuttings samples and absence of oil on the shakers or in
the mud initially suggested the Volpriehausen reservoir was entirely gas bearing (
although there was some indication on the gas chromatograph that a change in fluid
charter had occurred around 1750m with increased C4s and C5s). Evaluation of the
MDT pressure data from run 2C clearly showed 3 separate fluid gradients in the
Volpriehausen; gas, oil and water. The presence of an column was confirmed by fluid
MDT samples and oil shows in the rotary sidewall cores.
The Hewett Formation was entirely water bearing.
Petrophysical interpretation of the acquired data set confirms a 49.3 m TVD gas column
overlying an 11.6m oil column within the Volpriehausen Formation. Reservoir properties
within the Volpriehausen were good; net:gross close to 99%, average porosity 26.6% with
an average water saturation in the hydrocarbon bearing part of the reservoir of 31%.
Once the logging program was complete, a 7” liner was run and cemented in place and
the well was temporarily suspended as a gas and oil discovery pending future
development. The GSF Labrador was released from contract at 18:50 hrs on 23rd April
2008.
There were no first aids cases, restricted work cases or lost time incidents during the
drilling of well P11-06.

6. GEOLOGICAL SUMMARY
6.1 Geological Setting and prognosis
The Van Ghent structure is located offshore in block P11b on the Dutch Continental Shelf
approximately 55 km Northwest of The Hague. Tectonically the structure is a part of the
greater De Ruyter structure that is located on a ridge bounded by the London-Brabant
High to the South and The Winterton High in the North. The Permo-Triassic Shelf is
deepening towards the East into the West & Central Netherlands Basin and to the
Northwest towards the Sole Pit Basin. Various pre-Tertiary tectonic phases have given
the area a pronounced structural fabric with dominant NW-SE fault trends.
The Van Ghent structure is a NW-SE trending combination trap. SSW dipping Triassic
Volpriehausen sandstones are unconformably overlain by Lower Cretaceous Vlieland
claystones that act as a top seal. The lateral sealing mechanism is provided by
claystones of the Vlieland Claystone Formation that are offset against the Volpriehausen
horstblock. Towards the NW the underlying Lower Bunter Shale forms the seat seal of the
structure.
Pre drill geophysical studies identified the Van Ghent structure as having a high
probability of being hydrocarbon bearing with indications of a gas cap overlying a thin oil
column.
The reservoir section of the Van Ghent structure is analogous to, and can be correlated
with, similar Volpriehausen sections penetrated in well P10-05 (Van Brakel – gas
discovery) and P11-03 (De Ruyter – oil and gas discovery).

6.2 Well Objectives
The objectives of well P11-06 pre-drill are summarised as:
1. Drill a vertical exploration well through the entire Triassic Volpriehausen sequence (base
Lower Cretaceous to top Lower Buntsandstein).
2. Drill the well in a crestal position, in order to test a maximum hydrocarbon column.
3. If the reservoir is hydrocarbon bearing obtain sufficient information in order to evaluate

the commercial potential of the discovery (estimations of volumes of hydrocarbons in
place, potential reserves and well productivity), that is to say;
• acquire a full set of petrophysical logs through the reservoir to facilitate reservoir
characterization;
• obtain downhole pressure measurements and temperatures;
• establish fluid contacts;
• acquire good quality, uncontaminated fluid samples (gas, oil, water) in order to
obtain fluid properties (API, composition, dewpoint);
• perform a rig sourced check shot survey in order to establish a seismic to well tie;
• acquire rotary sidewall cores to help in the characterisation of the Volpriehausen

reservoir.

6.3 Summary of Well Results
The Van Ghent well was drilled as a vertical exploration well.
30” casing was driven to a depth of 145.9m MDBRT in the Upper North Sea Group
sands.
The overburden of Tertiary Upper North Sea Group sands and Middle to Lower North Sea
Group claystones was drilled in 17.1/2” hole to a section TD in the upper Ommelanden
chalk at 796m MDBRT. The 13.3/8” casing was run and set at 794m MDBRT without any
problems. The 12.1/4” section was drilled to a section TD of 1,704m MDBRT just into the
top reservoir target (2.1m into Volpriehausen Formation). Top reservoir was identified by
using the LWD At-Bit-Resistivity data which showed a potentially hydrocarbon bearing
reservoir. This was confirmed by the increase in drill gas with C1-C5 recorded in the
bottoms up sample.
The instability of the Vlieland Formation resulted in the wireline logging (Run 1A) not
reaching 12.1/4” section TD as it was held up at 1,687m MDBRT (17m off bottom). The
9.5/8” casing was set at 1,703m MDBRT (1m into Volpriehausen) to case off the unstable
Vlieland Claystone Formation yet allow the evaluation of almost a full reservoir section in
8.1/2” hole.
The entire Volpriehausen reservoir sequence was drilled from 1,702m to 1,801m MDBRT
in a crestal position on the Van Ghent structure. The planned TD (originally 50m along
hole into the Lower Buntsandstein) was deepened by 30m. Due to the higher than
expected LWD resistivity readings and the continued C1-C5 gas readings in the lower
section of the Volpriehausen reservoir it was considered prudent to evaluate the
underlying Hewett reservoir for hydrocarbons. LWD resistivity and subsequent formation
pressures confirmed the Hewett Formation was water bearing.
The well reached TD on 12th April 2008 at a depth of 1,892m MDBRT (1,852m TVDSS),
21m along hole into the Hewett Formation.
Top reservoir was recorded 11.5m deep to prognosis and top Lower Buntsandstein was
recorded 2.6m shallow to prognosis but within the +/- 20m seismic uncertainty range.

The rig sourced checkshot survey confirmed the proposed “slow velocity” depth
conversion model was valid at both P11-06 and the De Ruyter Field.
A comprehensive wireline logging programme was undertaken to fully evaluate the

Volpriehausen and Hewett reservoirs. The programme comprised 8 independent runs as
follows:
• Run #2A – DSI-HRLA-TLD-MCFL-CAL-CNL-HNGS-ACTS-SP-ECRD

• Run #2B – FMI-GPIT-GR-ACTS-LEHQT
• Run #2C – MDT-GR-ACTS-ECRD (Pressures)
• Run #2D – MDT-GR-ACTS-ECRD (Samples)
• Run #2E – VSI-GR-ACTS-LEHQT
• Run #2F – MDT-GR-ACTS-ECRD (Samples)
• Run #2G – MSCT-GR-ACTS-LEHQT
• Run #2H – CBL-VDL-GR-CCL
Excellent quality gamma ray, resistivity, neutron, density, and sonic log data allowed the
reservoir to be evaluated and characterized. An accurate GOC and FWL were
established through the acquired MDT pressures and although there was a failure during
the MDT gas sample acquisition (sample pump needed servicing at surface and was re-
run) a full set of pressurized oil, gas and water samples were acquired. An accurate rig
sourced checkshot was acquired to support the regional geophysical model.
The lack of good oil shows in the cuttings samples and absence of oil on the shakers or in
the mud initially suggested the Volpriehausen reservoir was entirely gas bearing,
although there was some indication on the gas chromatograph that a change in fluid
charter had occurred around 1750m (increased C4s and C5s). Evaluation of the MDT
pressure data from run 2C clearly showed 3 separate fluid gradients in the
Volpriehausen, gas, oil and water. The presence of an column was confirmed by fluid
samples and oil shows in the rotary sidewall cores.
The Schlumberger MDT tool was used to collect 16 formation fluid samples from 5
sampling depths with the objective of acquiring representative samples with <5% mud
filtrate contamination. The Live Fluid Analyser (LFA) was used to identify fluid types
when representative formation fluid was being pumped across the sensor. Although
when using water based mud the LFA software is unable to predict contamination levels,
a pH sensor was used and clearly identified the cleaning up from mud filtrate to formation
water. The samples were collected when the Schlumberger engineer/Wellsite team felt a

clean formation sample was being pumped. After consultation and authorization from the
Operations Geologist, the following samples were collected:
• 2 x water samples at 1871.4m (Hewett), using 450cc multi-phase sample chambers.

Formation pressure of 186.63 bar and a mobility of 322.1 mD/Cp was recorded. 100
litres pumped in 89 mins (Quicksilver system).
• 2 x water samples at 1797.5m (Volpriehausen), using 450cc multi phase sample
chambers. Formation pressure of 179.40 bar and a mobility of 203.2 mD/Cp was
recorded. 124 litres pumped in 155 mins (Quicksilver system).
• 6 x gas zone samples at 1733.2m (Volpriehausen), using 450cc multi phase sample
chambers. Formation pressure of 175.10 bar and a mobility of 416.7 mD/Cp was
recorded. 288 litres pumped in 165 mins (Quicksilver system).
• 4 x oil zone samples at 1754.5m, using 250cc single phase pressurised chambers.
Formation pressure of 175.47 bar and a mobility of 23.5 mD/Cp was recorded. 141
litres pumped in 256 mins (standard probe system).
• 2 x oil zone samples at 1755.2m MDBRT (Volpriehausen), using 250cc single phase
pressurised chambers. Formation pressure of 175.44 bar and a mobility of 2.5 mD/Cp
was recorded. 391 litres pumped in 210 mins (standard system).
The Quicksilver dual probe system was used to reduce clean up pumping times and
provide formation samples with minimum contamination, although on the oil sampling, the
sandstones had low permeabilities which resulted in excessive drawdown with the
Quicksilver dual pump system and the decision was made to do the cleanup with a single
pump. The samples recovered were of sufficient quality to allow full analysis by Core
Laboratories Limited. The PVT analysis on the gas sample measured a gas density of
0.1462 g/cc which corresponds to a gradient of 0.0143 bar/m. The measured oil density
was 0.659 g/cc corresponding to a gradient of 0.0646 bar/m.
Acquisition of uncontaminated water samples in a water based drilling mud environment

is difficult and the addition of a pH fluid analyser sensor was regarded as a success. The
pH sensor clearly identify the cleaning up profile while pumping and enable the samples
to be taken without spending excessive and unnecessary time on cleanup pumping.
Rotary sidewall cores were acquired to constrain the petrophysical evaluation and
improve the reservoir characterization. Although there were initial problems with the
rotary sidewall coring tool, once modified correctly, 40 of the 50 sidewall cores attempted
were recovered. Quality of the rotary sidewall cores was generally excellent and the
recovered cores were suitable for conventional core analysis and petrography.

Petrophysical analysis of the acquired data set on the P11-06 well indicates a 49.8 m
TVD gas column was penetrated by the well. A clear Gas Oil Contact is seen on the
formation pressure gradient data at 1711.4m TVDSS (1751.8m MDBRT). An 11.6m TVD
oil column is defined on pressure gradient data with the Free Water Level (FWL) picked
at 1723.0m TVDSS (1763.4m MDBRT). The FWL indicated by the pressure data is in
good agreement with the calculated Rxo curve indicating non moveable hydrocarbon
below 1723.0m TVDSS. Below the FWL a 22m TVD interval of residual hydrocarbon is
interpreted, the water saturation in this zone averages about 70%.
The pressure data showed a step change of 1.1 Bars in pressure between the
Volpriehausen water leg and the slightly lower pressured Hewett Formation. This may be
the result of pressure depletion associated with the De Ruyter production from the P11-A-
01 and P11-A-02A wells.
Net Sand and Net Pay were defined through cut-offs. The porosity cut-off is based on the
core porosity-permeability cross-plot and set to 10.5%. The recorded reservoir properties
over the Volpriehausen Formation are summarized as follows:
• Complete Volpriehausen Formation: 98.1m MDBRT net sand, 99.2% net:gross,

an average porosity 26.6%, average permeability 705mD and an average water
saturation as 31.5%.
• Gas Leg: 49.3m MDBRT net sand, 98.7% net:gross, an average porosity 27.0%,
average permeability 842mD and an average water saturation as 27.1%.
• Oil Leg: 11.6m MDBRT net sand, 100% net:gross, an average porosity 24.8%,
average permeability 108mD and an average water saturation as 52.5%.
• Water Leg: 37.3m MDBRT net sand, 99.6% net:gross and an average porosity
25.5%.
Once the logging program was completed, a 7” liner was run and cemented in place and
the well was temporarily suspended as a gas and oil discovery pending future
development. The GSF Labrador was released from contract on 18:50 hrs on 23rd April
2008.

6.4 Post-well studies
Core Laboratories was contracted to carry out analyses on the formation fluid samples
taken from the well. A full API ion analysis, organic acid analysis, sulphate analysis and
dissolved CO2 analysis was performed on the water samples. Compositional analysis
from cryogenic distillation and PVT analysis (constant composition expansion) was
performed on the gas samples. Results are in the separate report - Core Lab; Reservoir
Fluid Study for Petro-Canada Well P11-06.
A total of 40 rotary sidewall cores were recovered from well P11-06. The cores were sent
to Corex (UK) Ltd for analysis. Each core was cleaned and dried under controlled
conditions before being analysed conventionally for porosity, permeability and grain
density. Sidewall core petrography was carried out by Corex (UK) Ltd. 16 of the rotary
sidewall cores were selected for petrographic analysis. The full analysis and results are
contained in Corex (UK) Limited Petrographic Report, Exploration Well P11-06, Job No
2008-047A.
I.G.I (Integrate Geochemical Interpretation Ltd) were contracted to provide analysis and
interpretation of the following data acquired in well P11-06:
• Sidewall cores from 1732.5m (gas leg), 1769.8m and 1782.5m (water leg)
• MDT Gas Sample
• MDT Oil sample
The objectives of the geochemical analysis were to:

• Extract geochemical data from the reservoir of P11-06 for a comparison with oils
gasses and stains analysed in the De Ruyter, Van Nes and Van Brakel Fields.
• Establish oil /oil and gas / gas correlations with offset Fields.
• Establish the relationship if any between the oil and the gas in the P11-06
reservoir.
• Identify the source of the oil and gas.
• Integrate the results into the existing database and propose an updated model for
the history of oil and gas charging in the greater De Ruyter area.

The rig source high density checkshot data was processed by Upwave Limited. The
VSP has provided a high frequency, multiple-free image at the reservoir interval and
reflectivity beneath TD. Report number: VSP Processing Report VEA000393226.
Logicom were contracted to provide image log processing and interpretation of the FMI
log acquired in the 8 ½” open hole section of P11-06 from 1892m MDBRT to 1703m
MDBRT. The contractor provided the following service
• Image processing.
• Manual / interactive dip computation.
• Structural and sedimentological analysis.

7. WELL OPERATIONS
7.1 Drilling Operations Overview
Dutch Sector of the North Sea. The objective was to drill and evaluate the Volpriehausen
formation for hydrocarbons. The well was drilled according to license agreement with
EBN (PCNL 50.00% and EBN 50.00%).
The Transocean “GSF Labrador” jack-up rig was utilised to drill the well. The rig came on
contract on the P11-06 well from 08:30 hrs on 26th March 2008 and was positioned on the
final approved surface location.
The well was drilled vertically until a total depth of 1892m MDBRT with a maximum
inclination of 2.13 degrees. The 30”, 13.3/8” and 9.5/8” casing scheme resulted in an
8.1/2” hole through the Volpriehausen reservoir.
The Volpriehausen reservoir sequence was drilled from 1701.9m to 1800.8m MDBRT at a
crestal position of the Van Ghent structure. Top reservoir was recorded 11.5m deep to
prognosis and top Lower Buntsandstein was recorded 2.6m shallow to prognosis. The
reservoir section was initially drilled to 1863m MDBRT, but was extended by the
subsurface team to be drilled into the Hewett Formation to test for any hydrocarbons
present in these sandstones. Final TD was called at 1892m, 21m AH into the Hewett
Formation. Seven open hole logging tool strings were run over the reservoir: Run #2A,
DSI-HRLA-TLD-MCFL-CAL-CNL-HNGS-ACTS-SP-ECRD; Run #2B, FMI-GPIT-GR-
ACTS-LEHQT; Run #2C, MDT-GR-ACTS-ECRD (Pressures); Run #2D, MDT-GR-
ACTS-ECRD (Samples); Run #2E, VSI-GR-ACTS-LEHQT; Run #2F, MDT-GR-ACTS-
ECRD (Samples); Run #2G, MSCT-GR-ACTS-LEHQT; Run #2H, CBL-VDL-GR-CCL.
Once the logging program was completed, a 7” liner was ran and cemented in place and
the well was temporarily suspended.
The TransOcean Labrador was released from the P11-06 on 18:50 hrs on the 23rd of April
2008 after releasing the last tow vessel from the main bridle at the mouth of the Verolme
Shipyard.
There were no first aids, restricted work cases or lost time incidents during the drilling of
P11-06.

7.2 Summary by hole section
7.2.1 Rig Move in

The Transocean Labrador came under contract when it traveled 500m from Tullow Oil
'Doris' well at (53° 03' 01.660" N; 01° 52' 22.640" E) at 08:30 hrs on March 26th, 2008.
The rig was towed with lead vessel “Island Valiant” on the main bridle and assist vessel
“Anglian Earl” on the port side bridle. The tight tow to Petro-Canada P11-06 “Van Ghent”
location covered a distance of 71.4nm at an average speed of 4.3knts. The speed was
greater than predicted and mostly due to favourable tides for the duration. The Labrador
entered the 500m zone of Petro-Canada P11-06 well at 06:36hrs on March 27th, and all
legs were down and pinned at 08:00 hrs on March 27th. The tow vessel, “Island Valiant”
was released at 10:00 hrs on March 27th, the “Anglian Earl” was held until pre-load and
jacking operations were complete at 04:30 hrs on March 28th.
The legs were pinned and the rig was jacked up to preload air gap of 5m. Pre-loading
commenced at 09:30hrs on March 27th and it took 15 hrs to fully pre-load the rig to 99.7%
of VDL or 6891mt. The pre-load was held for 1 hour for confirmation and it took 4 hrs to
dump the pre-load and jack to a final air gap of 23.5m (RT-MSL: 40.0m, RT-Mudline:
73.4m), final position of the rig was 1.93m at 352° from the intended position with a
heading of 236° and the initial estimate of penetration was 0.3m. The cantilever was skid
into E1 position and the Enerpac tensioning system was installed, at the same time, the
spud vessel ‘Far Grimshader’ began offloading bulks and tubulars, working spud boat
was suspended due to winds in excess of 45 knots and high seas. The rig installed the
top package, the flowline and began picking up tubulars while waiting for the seas to
diminish. In total 2.0hrs were lost due to weather.
The initial spud can ROV survey took place on March 28th by GB Diving as usual there
was minimal penetration of the “Labrador’s” flat cans. The survey was repeated 24 hours
later with some evidence of scouring seen on mainly the port leg. Due to the possibility of
more extensive scouring, rock dumping was mobilized, and carried out around all three
legs (4x sides per leg). The rock dumping vessel HAM 601 (from Van Oord) was
mobilized on April 2nd and arrived in the field at 22:00 hrs on April 3rd. Rock dumping was
carried out successfully, with approximately 80-90 ton dumped on each side of the three
spud cans, note that approximately 2 hrs of on-line time was used by the rock dumping.
The HAM 601 was complete and departed the 500m zone at 07:00 hrs on April 4th – post
dumping survey was acceptable as were all follow-up ROV surveys.

7.2.2 30” Conductor

The 30” conductor was finally offloaded from the spud boat, measured and run, the rig
waited approximately 2hrs for slack tide to begin driving conductor. The seabed was
tagged at on depth at 74.4m. The 30” conductor was driven to 145.93m MDBRT and
refusal occurred at 151 blows/0.25m. The sea bed penetration was 72.53m with the mud
line landing ring at 102.37m, in total 13x joints of conductor were running (including the
shoe and BWS joint).
The 30” conductor was cold cut at 3.15m above the conductor tensioning deck (i.e.
12.53m below RKB) to accommodate the 29.1/4” MSP diverter and bell nipple. The
diverter was installed with one side outlet and tested. The 30” conductor was tensioned to
40mT using the rigs CTU.
The conductor was cleaned out with seawater and a 24” Y11 rock bit to 142m MDBRT
(3m above shoe depth). The well was displaced to 1.05sg Bentonite spud mud.
Note that there was an error in the initial measurement of the buttweld sub compared with
the land-out seen on the 13-3/8” casing. The depths listed here are based on final land-
out measurement and a dummy run – some discrepancies may be seen in drilling reports
with regards of BWS depth. No obvious cause for the tally discrepancy can be found.
7.2.3 17.1/2” Hole / 13.3/8” Casing

A packed rotary BHA with 17.1/2” near bit and two full gauge string stabilizers was picked
with a 17.1/2” T11C rock bit. The BHA was washed down to 142m. Drilling commenced at
01:30 hrs on April 1st, to prevent wash-out the top hole sands were drilled initially with
2,500lpm using bentonite mud and 3-5 ton WOB until the top stabilizer entered new hole.
When flow was increased to 3000lpm, losses were seen in the range of ±80bbls/hr. The
well was flowchecked – static. Losses were primarily due to overloading at the shakers.
While drilling at 195m, it was discovered that the diverter had turned approximately 180°
on the conductor stump. Drilling was suspended and the string was pulled back into the
conductor. Approximately 2.5 hrs were taken to re-orient the diverter and run back in the
hole.
Drilling resumed with 2500lpm and 110rpm and down to 400m the well was drilled with
seawater. Hi-vis sweeps were pumped every stand. The North Sea Clays were
encountered at approximately 500m. Drilling was suspended for a short time, and the well
was circulated while the KCl mud was built at surface. The KCl system is vital for
inhibition of the gumbo clays. When drilling resumed, flow rate was gradually increased to

4,000lpm (148 bar SPP) and was maintained from 500m MDBRT to 796m MDBRT.
Penetration rate was limited to 30m/hr to prevent any gumbo problems at surface or in
the riser. The top of the Ommelanden Chalk was encountered at 771m MDBRT and at
796m MDBRT the section was TD’d. The well was circulated clean and flow checked, the
EMS was dropped and pumped down with a nut shell plug. The nut shell was displaced
out of the hole, although it was too strung out to get an accurate gauge on the hole
diameter. Only minor tight spots were seen whilst pumping out of hole at 3,500lpm. The
17.1/2” stabilizers were laid down and the EMS was recovered. The tool indicated a
maximum inclination in the 17.1/2” hole section of 2.1° at 227m and a TD inclination at
0.92° at 779m. There was no wear noted on the BHA and the 17.1/2” T11C was graded
1/1/WT/A/1/I/CT/TD.
The 13.3/8” casing was run and washed down without incident until the land-out. It was
washed down from 778m. At 794m, the casing stood up about 0.40m short of the
anticipated shoe depth. The tallied depth of the conductor BWS was the source of the
discrepancy. The wellhead and running tool were pulled and the landing string
configuration was altered (shortened by approximately 0.40m) – the casing landed
without incident. The incorrect space-out cost approximately 5 hours of rig time and
meant that the 30” conductor had to be re-cut as the rig was unable to activate the
wellhead load ring (cut by only 3”).
The 13.3/8” casing was finally landed at 794m MDBRT after changing out the space out
joint. The casing was cemented in place with 1.58sg Pozmix lead slurry (83.5m³; 76.6mt)
and 1.67sg Pozmix tail slurry (15.7m³; 16.8mt). The cement was displaced with 1.20sg
mud and the plug was bumped after pumping 60m³ of fluid. No losses were seen during
cementing and the final hydrostatic prior to bump was ±45bar. The casing was tested to
138bar for 20mins. During the cement job, approximately 2m³ of cement was seen back
at surface. The wash ports were opened, the annulus was circulated clean with seawater
at 2,000lpm, and a 15m3 retarder / sugar pill was spotted around the MLS prior to closing
the ports. The 13.3/8” was then pressure tested to 138 bar.
The 29.1/4” MSP diverter and bell nipple was removed and set back. Due to the incorrect
space-out of the buttweld sub, the conductor had to be re-cut by 0.12m to accommodate
the wellhead landing ring. The 30” landing ring was finally installed after applying 7tons of
overpull. The bell nipple began leaking at the bell nipple connection. The bell nipple was
rigged down, repaired and re-installed, the leaking bell nipple cost approximately 1.25
hrs. In the meantime the INTEQ spool piece was installed in the derrick. The 13.5/8” BOP
and surface equipment were tested to 40bar (LP) and 345 bar (HP).

7.2.4 12.1/4” Hole / Logging / 9.5/8” Casing

A 12.1/4” steerable assembly with a HCC MX-03 insert bit was picked up. The 9.1/2”
M1XL motor (AKO 0.6°) and MWD gamma ray was tested for pulse and decoding. The
BHA was run-in and 36joints of 5” drill-pipe was picked up, a BOP and stripping drill were
also performed on the trip in. The top of the cement plug / float collar was tagged on
depth at 764m MDBRT. The plugs, float collar, firm cement and shoe were drilled out in
2.50hrs. The rathole was cleaned from 794m to 796 MDBRT. New formation was drilled
to 800m MDBRT with 2,500lpm and 5ton WOB. The mud was circulated and conditioned
to an even 1.19SG Gel/polymer. A LOT was performed to the equivalent mud weight of
1.68sg.
Further drilling proceeded with rotary drilling from 800m MDBRT with 3,500lpm and 3-
14ton WOB. A flow check was performed at 846m due to a drilling break and Azimuth
corrections were performed at 846-862m, 875-890m and 1130-1145m. Drilling continued
to 1353m and the well was displaced to a fresh 1.2SG KCl-glycol system and the bit was
pulled in order to run a rotary BHA with a near bit resistivity feature. The trip out was
uneventful, the MWD was laid-out downloaded and laid out and the bit was graded a 1-2-
BT-S-E-I-CT-BHA. Overall on-bottom ROP for the bit was 15.9m/hr. A dummy run was
made to MLS ring prior to RIH with the BHA. This figure puts the BWS at 102.374m, and
the HO 9.5/8” MLH at 102.752m, the original depth was at 103.07m (top of conductor at
12.529m).
The purpose of a second BHA run was to use a near-bit resistivity and set the 9.5/8”
casing shoe just into the top of the reservoir (<2m). The new BHA with HCC HC605 PDC
was picked up and RIH on a packed rotary assembly. An additional 48 joints of 5” DP
were picked up on the trip. The section drilled through the troublesome Vlieland shale and
1m into the Volpriehausen sandstone to 1704m MDBRT. The well was circulated clean
with a bottoms-up gas of 10.5%. The BHA was pulled from 1704m, then after
encountering some tight spots (5-13mt overpull), it was decided to pump out to 1344m at
1750lpm. No further tight spots were encountered and the BHA was pulled conventionally
from 1344m to surface. The MWD was downloaded and racked, the bit was graded a 0-0-
NO-A-X-I-NO-TD.
Schlumberger wireline was rigged up and ran wireline run 1A: DSI-PPS-PEX-ACTS. The
string would not pass tight spots at 1686m (18m off bottom). The decision was made to
log-up only from the depth of 1686m to 70m – this was accomplished without issue. The

wireline was pulled out of the hole and rigged down. The caliper log gave an average hole
size of 12.516”.
The 9.5/8” wear-bushing was pulled and the wellhead / BOP’s were flushed.
BJ were rigged up and the 9-5/8” casing was run to 1703m (1m off bottom). Prior to
exiting the 13.3/8” casing shoe, an attempt was made to break circulation. The BJ FAC
tool would not enter the casing and had to be forced in – damaging the cups. The second
set of cups also did not fit and had to be forced in, these also had to be changed out, the
first set were reformed and finally were able to squeeze this set in, the incident with the
FAC tool cost 1.5 hours of rig time. The casing was run to 1685m with no issues, but
would not travel past 1686m. The string was picked up and 2.25 hrs were spent washing
and working to string to bottom, finally landing off at 1703m. It shall be noted that the KCl
concentration was depleted to 95 kg/m3 prior to reaching TD.
An 8.0m³ of Tuned E+ spacer (1.44sg) was pumped and the bottom plug was released.
The casing was cemented in place with a 1.58sg Pozmix lead slurry (34.4m³; 31.5mt) and
1.67sg Pozmix tail slurry (5.7m³; 6.6mt). The cement was displaced with 1.20sg mud and
the plug was bumped after pumping 64.7m³ of fluid. No losses were seen during
cementing and the final hydrostatic prior to bump was ±82bar, giving a predicted top of
cement inside the 13.3/8” at 440m.
An attempt was made to test the casing, however a leak was seen on the cement-head,
as the calculated top of cement was deep (440m) and no signs of spacer / cement were
seen during the displacement, it was accepted that there was no need to open the wash-
ports on the MLS. To test the casing, the water bushing was made up and the casing
tested to 275 bar for 20 minutes. The MLS was then tightened to 5000 ft-lbs, the
adjustment nut setting tool was run and set. A run was made with the mill and flush tool
and two attempts were made to set the seal assembly with no success. The seal
assembly was laid out and a third run was made with the mill and flush tool, after this run,
the seal assembly was set and the entire string was successfully tested to 276bar for 20
minutes.
The pollution pans were installed in the rotary housing and the wear bushing was set.
7.2.5 8 ½” Hole / Logging / 7” Liner

All 8.1/4” DC were laid out from the derrick and the 8.1/2” BHA was made up and run in
hole. The 8.½” packed rotary BHA was run with an 8.½” Smith MD1616LBPX PDC, and

MWD tool (DIR-RES-GR). The primary MWD tool had to be changed out due to damage
on its access port, meaning it could not be programmed, which cost approximately 0.75
hrs of downtime. A choke and stripping drill was performed prior to tripping in the hole.
The plugs and float collar were tagged at 1674m MDBRT, the shoetrack was drilled to the
shoe in 4.25hrs, which includes 0.75 hrs for preparing the rig for a closed system (i.e. skip
and ship in the event that oily cuttings were seen back at surface.
The 8.½” hole section was drilled to a TD at 1892m MDBRT with a 1.22SG KCl-glycol-
polymer mud. The section was drilled with 2200lpm (160 bar SPP), 110 RPM and 5000
ft-lbs of torque. Maximum gas readings for the section were approximately 8% and the
bit averaged 26.9m/hr on bottom ROP. As mentioned the section was drilled on a closed
system without issue, although no indications of hydrocarbons were seen at surface or on
the mud engineers retort.
After flow-checking and pumping out the hole to the 9.5/8” casing shoe, a drift was
dropped in preparation for the 7” liner run and the string was pulled and racked in the
derrick.
Schlumberger wireline was rigged up and began wireline logging operations. The
following runs were performed:
1. Run #2A – DSI-HRLA-TLD-MCFL-CAL-CNL-HNGS-ACTS-SP-ECRD

¾ No issues with this run, total time from picking up tools to laying out tools
was 8.75hrs.
2. Run #2B – FMI-GPIT-GR-ACTS-LEHQT

¾ No issues with this run, total time from picking up tools to laying out tools
was 6.00hrs.
3. Run #2C – MDT-GR-ACTS-ECRD

¾ Due to the unavailability of OilPhase sampling analysis, the MDT was split
into two separate runs; the first for pressure readings. After
troubleshooting the different readings from the strain and quartz gauges, a
total of 28x pressure points were taken. Total time from picking up tools to
laying out tools was 15.25hrs.
4. Run #2D – MDT-GR-ACTS-ECRD


¾ This was a reconfiguration of the first MDT run; this run was for samples.
A total of 6x samples were taken, however there was difficulty getting oil
samples where eventually the pump module failed. It was decided to make
a VSI run before attempting another MDT run. Total time from picking up
tools to laying out tools was 25.00hrs (2.5 hrs considered non-productive
time).
5. Run #2E – VSI-GR-ACTS-LEHQT

¾ The VSI was run to 1660m and check-shots were taken on the trip out
every 50m. The VSI gave an approximate top of cement at 510m. Total
time from picking up tools to laying out tools was 5.75hrs.
6. Run #2F – MDT-GR-ACTS-ECRD

¾ This was a second sampling run after the failure on the first. A total of 10x
different samples were taken without issue. Total time from picking up
tools to laying out tools was 17.00hrs (4.25 hrs considered non-productive
time).
Prior to performing a sidewall core run, it was decided to make a wiper trip to
circulate the well and break the filter cake. The trip was made without any
problems and no fill was seen at TD (max. gas on bottoms-up was 12%). After
taking torque and drags for the liner, the BHA was pumped back to the 9.5/8”
shoe and pulled out. Approximately 11hrs was taken for the clean-out run.
7. Run #2G – MSCT-GR-ACTS-LEHQT

¾ The sidewall core tool would not enter open hole and had to be pulled to
surface to install a hole finder. Sidewall coring commenced and the tool
failed after 7 cores were taken. The tool was again pulled to surface and
repaired. The tool was re-run and an additional 43x cores were taken (50
in total for the two runs). At surface 40x cores were recovered. Total time
from picking up tools to laying out tools was 13.75hrs (3.5 hrs considered
non-productive time).
8. Run #2H – CBL-VDL-GR-CCL

¾ No issues with this run. Based on cement bond log interpretation the
possible top of hard cement could be estimated at 780m MDBRT, however
waveform interpretation put the top higher, closer to the depth

corresponding with final displacement pressure or VSI interpretation. Total

time from picking up tools to laying out tools was 6.00hrs.
In total, wireline operations took 4.55 days from rig-up to rig down (including 11hrs for a
clean-out run). To confirm integrity in the 9.5/8” x 13.3/8” annulus, an offline 50 bar
‘squeeze’ pressure test was carried out, perfect test.
The 29ppf, L-80 7” liner was made up. A BOT UNIFLEX liner hanger system with HRD
running tool including DOBS was picked up and tested. The liner hanger was run in hole
to 1890m on 5” drill pipe to 1700m. The string was circulated and rotated at 20 RPM prior
to entering open hole. The liner was unable to get to TD (1892m), so it was decided to set
it at 1888m (top of liner at 1646m). The liner hanger setting ball was dropped and
circulated down to the ball seat in the landing collar. The hanger was set by pressuring up
to 140bar for 5 mins. The string was pressured up to 276bar to release from running tool
and DOBS. Pick-up string and observe that liner weight (25klbs) was lost. Circulate with
800lpm and 20 RPM while mixing cement.
An 8.0m³ spacer of Tuned spacer (1.44sg) was pumped and the bottom plug was
released. The casing was cemented in place with an 1.72g Pozmix slurry (6.0m³). The
cement was displaced with 1.20sg mud and the plug was bumped after pumping 19.8m³
of fluid. No losses were seen during cementing and the liner was tested to 172bar. The
ZXP packer was set with 22mt down and 55 bar pressure applied to inner string. The
running string was pulled and a pressure drop was witnessed to ensure the running string
was pulled out of the seal area to allow for proper circulation in order for the excess
cement to be reverse circulated out.
A total of 4.8m3 of contaminated mud / cement was seen at surface. A sponge ball was
dropped and the well was circulated conventionally at 2000lpm prior to pulling out. The
top of the 7” liner was reported at 1646m MDBRT.
7.2.6 Temporary Suspension

A 3.1/2” cement stinger (150m) was made up and RIH on 5” drill pipe to 1795m MDBRT,
where a 2.0m3 Hi-vis pill was spotted in the 7” liner.
Cement plug #1 the liner top “T” plug was pumped and set from 1598 to 1698m MDBRT.
A 1.71sg Pozzmix slurry was pumped and displaced with 1m3 of water and 13m3 of mud.
In the meanwhile an injectivity test was successfully performed to 50 bar on the 13.3/8” x
9.5/8” annulus. Cement plug #1 was tested 50 bar (725 psi)/15 min.

POOH with stinger to 900m and pump and displace a 4.0m3 Hi-vis pill. Cement plug #2
was set from 694m to 794 m MDBRT. POOH with stinger to 250m and laid out excess 5”
drill pipe. Cement plug #3 was set from 250 to 150m. An 1.71sg Pozzmix slurry was
pumped and displaced with 0.9m3 of seawater. Displaced well to inhibited seawater and
lay down the 3.1/2” cement stinger.
Two attempts were required to retrieve the seal assembly due to incorrect make-up of the
running tool. The 9.5/8” Dril-Quip adjustment setting tool was made-up and the
adjustment sub was released from tension.
The 9.5/8” casing hanger was then released from the MLS and the casing pulled and laid
out. A Dril-Quip 9 5/8” TA cap was installed in the MLS at 103m MDBRT.
The bell nipple and 13.5/8” BOP were then removed. The 13.3/8” casing was backed off
at the MLS, pulled and laid out. A Dril-Quip TA cap was installed in the 13 3/8” MLS at
102m MDBRT and confirmed with 5mT overpull.
The 30” conductor was cut at 71.9m MDBRT this is 1.5m above seabed. The 30”
conductor was pulled and laid out. Two connections had to be broken with flame cutter.
The seabed protection dome was picked up from the supply vessel with lifting gear and
suspended underneath the drive deck. One of the BOP winches failed, which
implemented that the dome was trapped underneath the drive deck and it was not
possible to make-up the running tool. In total 2hrs were lost due to this incident. The
dome was connected and lowered with the tuggers from the rig floor. The running tool on
5” HWDP was connected to the dome. The seabed protection dome was installed onto
seabed after waiting on slack tide for 4hrs and 15minutes.
During this operation an ROV was deployed to assist in the installation of the protection
dome and a seabed clearance survey was also performed.
7.2.7 Demobilise
Once all remaining tubulars had been laid-out from the derrick, the top package and
cantilever were skidded in and secured. The Texas deck was rigged down and the BOP’s
were opened up. All sea-fastening was complete and the rig was jacked down to a 5m air
gap. The lead vessel “Sea Lynx” was attached to the main tow bridle, and the
accompanying vessel “Zeus” were hooked up to the port tow bridle. Water tight integrity
was confirmed and the rig was jacked down into the water and was outside the P11-06
500m zone at 22:55 hrs on April 22nd, 2008. As the rig was going off contract, Petro-

Canada was responsible for the rig until the final tow vessel was released in the mouth of
the harbour at the Keppel/Verolme Shipyard, Rotterdam.
Tight tow from Petro-Canada P-11-06 Van Ghent location (52° 21.6' N Lat 03° 45.5' E) to
Verolme Shipyard, Rotterdam (51° 54.1' N Lat 04° 16.6' E) with lead vessel Sea Lynx and
assist vessel Zeus covered 37.2nm at an average speed of 2.3knots. It shall be noted
that the spread was slowed down in order to travel up the Maas river. At the mouth of the
Maas river two aft quarter harbour tugs were hooked-up. The lead vessel “Sea Lynx” was
released from the main bridle at 18:50 hrs on April 23rd, 2008 ending the contract.

7.3 Hole / Casing Summary
Hole Casing
Shoe Shoe
Top Base Remarks / LOT / FIT
Size Size Depth Depth
MDBRT MDBRT
MDBRT TVDRT
- - - 30” 145.9 m 145.9 m -
LOT to 1.68sg at
17.1/2” 146 m 796 m 13.3/8” 794 m 794 m 800 m MDBRT (-760m TVDSS)
Ommelanden Fm.
12.1/4” 796 m 1,704 m 9.5/8” 1,703 m 1,703 m -
8.1/2” 1,704 m 1,892 m 7” 1,888 m 1,888 m Top of liner at 1646m MDBRT.
7.4 Drilling / Operational inefficiencies related to Geology
Hole Section Comment
• No geologically related drilling inefficiencies were encountered during

17 ½” the drilling of this section. Excellent progress (ROPs >30m/hr) was
made without any gumbo problems at surface or in the riser.
• Wireline logging (Run 1A) held up at 1,687m MDBRT (17m off

12 ¼”
bottom) in basal Vlieland Formation.
• No geologically related drilling inefficiencies were encountered during

8 ½” the drilling of this section. Excellent progress (ROPs >30m/hr) was
made.

8. LITHOSTRATIGRAPHY SUMMARY
8.1 Formation Tops
Well P11-06, Van Ghent: LITHOSTRATIGRAPHY
Formation / Prognosed Actual Diff TWT

System Group
Member (m) (m) (m) (msec)
MDBRT TVDSS MDBRT TVDSS TVD

Upper Seabed / Undifferentiated
75 35 74.0 34.0 -1.0 50
North Sea Upper North Sea Group
Base Miocene Uncon. /
Tertiary Lower - Middle North Sea 357 317 361.0 320.9 +3.9 367
to Group
Recent North Sea Basal Dongen Tuffite
Not Not Not
Member
719.4 679.2 755
prognosed prognosed prognosed
Landen 705 665 726.9 686.7 +21.7 762
Upper Ommelanden Chalk 768 728 769.3 729.1 +1.1 803

Chalk
Cretaceous Texel Greensand Mbr. 1,176 1,136 1,327.7 1,287.4 +151.4 1160
Upper Holland Marl Mbr. 1,329 1,289 1,353.5 1,313.2 +24.2 1176
Not Not Not
Middle Holland Clst Mbr. 1,397.9 1,357.6 1207
Lower
Rijnland
Cretaceous Not Not Not
Lower Holland Marl Mbr. 1,467.1 1,426.7 1259
Vlieland Claystone / Fault 1,519 1,479 1,539.8 1,499.4 +20.4 1312
BCU / Volpriehausen 1,690 1,650 1,701.9 1,661.5 +11.5 1427

Lower GOC 1,756 1,716 1,751.8 1,711.4 -4.6 1463
Lower
Germanic
Triassic FWL
Trias 1,778 1,738 1,763.4 1,723.0 -15.0 1470
Lower Buntsandstein 1,803 1,763 1,800.8 1,760.4 -2.6 1495
Upper Not Not Not

Zechstein Hewett 1,870.7 1,830.3 1536
Permian prognosed prognosed prognosed
TD 1,853 1,813 1,892.0 1,851.6 +38.6 1550

8.2 Formation Summary
Refer to Appendix A for full description of each collected & spot cuttings sample.
System : Tertiary to Recent

Group : Upper North Sea
Formation : Undifferentiated (Maassluis, Oosterhout and Breda Formations)
Member : -
Interval : Seabed, 74.0 m to 361.0 m MDBRT (-34.0m to -320.9 m TVDSS).
Pick Criteria : Cuttings
Lithology : From examination of first returns at 150m MDBRT, the section
consists of loose sands becoming increasingly interbedded with
clay towards the base.
Lithology : This interval consists predominantly of loose quartzose sands,
Description clear and colourless, moderately well sorted, very fine to fine
grained and accessories include organic material and shell
fragments. Below 265m MDBRT thin beds of pale to brownish grey
soft clay beds are present.
Drilling / : A 1.05sg Bentonite spud mud and sea water with viscous sweeps
Directional was used to drill this section. At 500m MDBRT the well was
displaced to 1.12sg Gel-Polymer mud. When entering the Chalk
the mud weight was 1.20sg. There were no losses while drilling
this section and no problems running 13.3/8” casing over this
section. Inclinations of up to 2.13 degrees were recorded over
the Upper North Sea Group.
ROPs : Average ROP during the interval (from 146m to 363m MDBRT)
was 32.5 m/hr. Maximum ROP was 72.4 m/hr and minimum ROP
was 8.3 m/hr.
Formation Gas : No drill gas was recorded while drilling this section.
Pore Pressure : Datalog Technology mudlogging concluded the section to be
Analysis normally pressured (refer to section 10.1).

System : Tertiary
Group : Lower to Middle North Sea
Formation : Undifferentiated (Rupel and Dongen Formations)
Member : -
Interval : 361.0 m to 719.4 m MDBRT (-320.9 m to -679.2 m TVDSS)
Pick Criteria : The top was picked at the base of a short interval with distinctive
higher GR readings, probably a result of glauconite enrichment.
Lithology : The section consists of claystones with sand interbeds to 450m
MDBRT and claystone from 450m to 719m MDBRT.
Lithology : From 363m to 450m mainly green grey clay and claystone, which
Description was slightly calcareous, pyritic and contained shell fragments.
Colourless sand is common, very fine to fine, moderately sorted
and sub rounded. From 450m, green grey to brown grey
claystone. From 690m to 700m tuffaceous claystone was
recorded, but from the wireline logs (lower GR and DT) it is
apparent that the top of the Basal Dongen Tuffite Member is at
719.4m MDBRT.
Drilling / : A 1.05sg Bentonite spud mud and sea water with viscous sweeps
Directional was used to drill this section. At 500m MDBRT the well was
displaced to 1.12sg KCl-Gel-Polymer mud to inhibit the gumbo
clays. There were no losses while drilling this section. The well
was planned as a vertical well but inclinations of up to 1.62
degrees were recorded over the Middle to Lower North Sea Group.
ROPs : Average ROP during the interval was 35.3 m/hr. Maximum ROP
was 60.6 m/hr and minimum ROP was 15.1 m/hr.
Formation Gas : No gas was recorded while drilling this section.

System : Tertiary
Group : Lower North Sea Group
Formation : Landen
Member : -
Interval : 726.9 m to 769.3 m MDBRT (-686.7 m to -729.1 TVDSS).
Pick Criteria : Top picked at the base of the overlying claystone interval which
was characterized with lower gamma ray and lower sonic readings.
Lithology : The section consists of claystones.
Lithology : The formation consists of varicoloured, predominantly grey,
Description occasionally brown claystones which are soft to firm and non
calcareous. Traces of sandstone, very fine grained were recorded.
Drilling / : At 500m MDBRT the well was displaced to 1.12sg KCl-Gel-
Directional Polymer mud to inhibit the gumbo clays. When entering the Chalk
the mud weight was 1.20sg. There were no losses while drilling
this section. The well was planned as a vertical well but
inclinations of up to 1.04 degrees were recorded over the Landen
Formation.

System : Cretaceous (Upper)

Group : Chalk
Formation : Ommelanden Chalk
Member : -
Interval : 769.3 m to 1,327.7 m MDBRT (-729.1 m to -1,287.4 m TVDSS).
Pick Criteria : The top of the formation was picked on the decrease in gamma ray
and sonic (wireline), with incoming of chalk in cuttings.
Lithology : Chalk with variable amount of Chert.
Lithology : The upper part of the Ommelanden consists of bioclastic
Description mudstones to grainstones. These are firm to moderate hard with
common siliceous material and slightly glauconitic and locally
nodular pyrite. The formation is very fossiliferous, with foraminifera,
sponge, coral and echinoderm fragments were observed. Chert is
common from 815m to 1070m and appears to be nodular in form
and pale grey in color with a common conchoidal fracture. The
amount of chert in the samples was overestimated due to the soft
nature of the chalk, which resulted in its dispersion into the mud.
Drilling / : The 17 ½” section was drilled to 796m MDBRT with a mudweight
Directional up to 1.20sg at section TD. The 13.3/8” casing was run and
landed at 793.9m MDBRT without any problems. The 12.1/4”
section was drilled with a Gel-Polymer mud of 1.14 - 1.17sg. A
motor was used to directional drill down to 1353m MDBRT to bring
the hole back to vertical. Inclinations of up to 1.58 degrees were
recorded over the Ommelanden Formation.

System : Cretaceous (Upper)

Group : Chalk
Formation : Texel Chalk
Member : Texel Greensand
Interval : 1,327.7 m to 1,353.5 m MDBRT (-1,287.4 m to -1,313.2 m
TVDSS).
Pick Criteria : The top was picked at an increase in GR and the appearance of
very glauconitic Marls and Sandstones in the samples.
Lithology : The section consists of Marl and Sandstone.

Lithology : The Marls are pale grey green to intense dark green, soft to firm,
Description sandy and strongly glauconitic, with abundant loose glauconite and
quartz grains, fine to coarse, rounded to well rounded.
The Sandstone is green grey, light grey brown, moderate hard,
very glauconitic, fine to medium grained and moderately sorted
quartz and calcareous cemented.
Drilling / : The 12.1/4” section was drilled with a Gel-Polymer mud of 1.14 -
Directional 1.17sg. The well was planned as a vertical well. A motor was
used to directional drill down to 1353m MDBRT to bring the hole
back to vertical. Inclinations of up to 1.50 degrees were recorded
over the Texel Greensand Member.
Formation Gas : Reliable gas readings were only recorded downhole from 1325m
MDBRT. Across the Texel Greensand Member, average
background gas 0.02%, maximum total gas was 0.03%. The
average compositional breakdown for the gas was C1 234ppm, C2
8ppm and C3 6ppm only. There was no connection, trip or swab
gas recorded.

System : Cretaceous (Lower)

Group : Rijnland
Formation : Holland
Member : Upper Holland Marl
TVDSS).
Pick Criteria : The top of the Holland Formation was marked by an increase in
the Gamma and Sonic values.
Lithology : The section consists of Marls with a Limestone stringer at the
base.
Lithology : The Marls are light to medium grey, soft to firm, amorphous to sub
Description blocky, glauconitic and silty, with local trace micro-pyrite and local
fine to medium quartz grains. The Limestone is off white, yellow
and green, crystalline and very glauconitic.
Drilling / : Upon entering the Upper Holland Marl at 1,353m MDBRT the hole
Directional was displaced to 1.20sg KCl-Gem-Polymer mud (for hole stability
while drilling the Holland and Vlieland Claystone Formations). At
this stage a round trip was made to change the BHA to include the
At-Bit-Resitivity LWD tool for the section TD decision. The well
was planned as a vertical well but inclinations of up to 1.51
degrees were recorded over the Upper Holland Marl Member.
Formation Gas : A slight increasing gas with depth trend was seen. Average total
gas of 0.07%, maximum total gas of 0.20% and with average C1
574ppm, C2 19ppm, C3 13ppm and no C4 and C5. There was no
connection, trip or swab gas recorded.


Group : Rijnland
Formation : Holland
Member : Middle Holland Claystone
TVDSS).
Pick Criteria : The top of this member was marked by an increase in the Gamma
Ray, below a distinct Limestone bed.
Lithology : The section consists of Claystones with some Sandstone stringers.
Lithology : The Claystones are medium brown grey to dark grey, soft,
Description amorphous, silty and very fine sandy and only slightly glauconitic.
The Sandstone is off white to grey, green grey, friable, fine
grained, well sorted, calcareous cemented and glauconitic.
Drilling / : The Middle Holland Claystone Member was drilled with a 1.20sg
Directional KCl-Gem-Polymer mud. There were no drilling problems. The
maximum recorded inclination was1.29 degrees.
Formation Gas : A gradual increase in gas with depth trend was seen. Average
total gas of 0.26%, maximum total gas of 0.70% and with average
C1 2399ppm, C2 138ppm, C3 94ppm, iC4 1ppm, nC4 1ppm and
no C5s. There was no connection, trip or swab gas recorded.


Group : Rijnland
Formation : Holland
Member : Lower Holland Marl
TVDSS).
Pick Criteria : The top is drawn at the base of the last GR claystone peak of the
Middle Holland Claystone Member.
Lithology : The interval consists of Claystones grading to Marl.
Lithology : The Claystones are medium brown grey to dark grey, calcareous,
Description soft, amorphous, silty, sandy. The Marls are light to medium
greenish grey, soft to firm, amorphous, silty, sandy, glauconitic and
grading to Claystone. With local trace Limestone, off white, yellow,
firm, mudstone.
Drilling / : The Lower Holland Marl Member was drilled with a 1.20sg KCl-
Directional Gem-Polymer mud. There were no drilling problems. The
maximum recorded inclination was 1.34 degrees.
Formation Gas : An increasing gas with depth trend is recorded (including C4s >
10ppm from 1493m MDBRT). Average total gas of 0.51%,
maximum total gas of 0.94% and with average C1 3851ppm, C2
306ppm, C3 230ppm, iC4 11ppm, nC4 11ppm, iC5 2 and nC5
1ppm. There was no connection, trip or swab gas recorded.


Group : Rijnland
Formation : Vlieland Claystone
Member : -
Interval : 1,539.8 m to 1,701.9 m MDBRT (-1,499.4m to -1,661.5 m TVDSS).
Pick Criteria : Top Vlieland Claystone was picked on the gamma ray log break.
Lithology : The section consists of Claystones.
Lithology : The Claystones are light grey through to dark grey, soft to
Description moderately hard, amorphous to sub fissile, calcaereous, silty, in
places fine sandy, and locally glauconitic. Common dolomitic /
calcareous laminations and streaks occur.
Drilling / : The Vlieland Claystone was drilled with a 1.20sg KCl-Gem-
Directional Polymer mud. There were no drilling problems. The maximum
recorded inclination was 1.02 degrees.
ROPs : ROPs were controlled towards the base of the Vlieland for section
TD at Top Volpriehausen. Vlieland Formation average ROP from
1,539m to 1,670m MDBRT was 29.3 m/hr. Maximum ROP was
42.6 m/hr and minimum ROP was 10.0 m/hr. From 1,670m
onwards drilling was controlled at 7.8 m/hr average, with a
minimum ROP of 3.8 m/hr and a maximum ROP of 12.4 m/hr.
Formation Gas : Gas levels and composition generally increased with depth through
the Vlieland with C3 increasing to >500ppm (below 1,540m) and
C4s>100ppm (below 1,550m) and C5 >10ppm (below 1,546m).
From 1,584m to 1,670m MDBRT gas levels are relatively low and
questionable (possibly a result of low mud level in header box or
ditch line partly blocking). Across the complete Vlieland Formation
average total gas was 0.38%, maximum total gas of 3.14% and
with average C1 2771ppm, C2 307ppm, C3 231ppm, iC4 31ppm,
nC4 41ppm, iC5 10 and nC5 9ppm. There was no connection, trip
or swab gas recorded.

System : Triassic (Lower)

Group : Lower Germanic Trias
Formation : Volpriehausen
Member : -
TVDSS).
Pick Criteria : The Base Cretaceous Unconformity is seen as a sharp decrease in
GR, coinciding with the appearance of sandstone in the cuttings.
Lithology : The section consists of Sandstones and local minor claystone
stringers.
Lithology : The sandstone is cream to very light grey green, predominantly
Description loose, occasionally slightly dolomite/silica cemented and locally
slightly argillaceous. The grains are in general fine to coarse,
colourless, poorly to moderately sorted quartz. From Top
Volpriehausen to 1775m MDBRT, very weak oil shows were
recorded in the cuttings.
Drilling / : The 12 ¼” section was TD at 1704m MDBRT and 2.1m into the
Directional Volpriehausen Formation based on the At-Bit-Resistivity LWD
data. The 9 5/8” casing was set at 1,703m, 1.1m into the
Volpriehausen Formation. The hole was displaced to 1.22sg Salt-
Polymer mud. This Volpriehausen Formation was drilled vertically
with no problems. Maximum inclination through the Volpriehausen
recorded 1.24 degree.
ROPs : ROPs were controlled while drilling the Volpriehausen Formation
for LWD quality. Volpriehausen Formation average ROP from was
33.0 m/hr, maximum ROP was 60.2 m/hr and minimum ROP was
3.6 m/hr.

Formation Gas : GAS LEG (1701.9m to 1751.8m MDBRT): average total gas was
5.39% (maximum 13.71%). Average C1 31701ppm, C2
2757ppm, C3 2755ppm, iC4 102ppm, nC4 136ppm, iC5 27ppm
and nC5 27ppm.
OIL LEG (1751.8m to 1763.4m MDBRT): average total gas was

4.50% (maximum 6.29%). Average C1 32841ppm, C2 5169ppm,
C3 5247ppm, iC4 310ppm, nC4 480ppm, iC5 124ppm and nC5
135ppm.
RESIDUAL OIL LEG (1763.4m to 1785.4m MDBRT): average

total gas was 3.69% (maximum 8.58%). Average C1 27390ppm,
C2 4931ppm, C3 5003ppm, iC4 291ppm, nC4 466ppm, iC5
120ppm and nC5 149ppm.
WATER LEG (1785.4m to 1800.8m MDBRT): average total gas

was 2.30% (maximum 7.38%). Average C1 13798ppm, C2
2185ppm, C3 2214ppm, iC4 144ppm, nC4 247ppm, iC5 96ppm
and nC5 125ppm.
The highest formation drill gas peak was at 1728m MDBRT with
13.7% total gas recorded (4.6% average background gas) and C1
99062ppm, C2 8731ppm, C3 7760ppm, iC4 466ppm, nC4
728ppm, iC5 244ppm and nC5 180ppm.
Note, from 1,704m to 1,723m (within the upper part of the

Volpriehausen reservoir gas leg) gas data was lost / unreliable due
to a data acquisition server error.
There was no connection, trip or swab gas recorded.


System : Triassic (Lower)

Group : Lower Germanic Trias
Formation : Lower Buntsandstein
Member : -
TVDSS).
Pick Criteria : Picked at top of first major claystone unit and corresponding to an
increase in Gamma ray, resistivity and density.
Lithology : The section consists of Claystones with Sandstones / Siltstones
interbeds.
Lithology : The Lower Buntsandstein comprises Claystones interbedded with
Description beds of Sand/Siltstone. The claystone is red brown or light grey
green, soft to hard, silty and sandy. The sandstone is very fine,
grading to silt, friable to hard, dolomite/silica cemented and with a
variable argillaceous matrix.
Drilling / : This Lower Buntsandstein Formation was drilled vertically with no
Directional problems. Maximum inclination through the Volpriehausen
recorded 0.74 degrees.
ROPs : Average ROP during the interval was 33.2 m/hr, maximum ROP
Formation Gas : Average total gas was 0.28 % and maximum 0.89%. Average C1
1789ppm, C2 79, C3 76ppm, iC4 10ppm, nC4 21ppm, iC5 18ppm
and nC5 33ppm. There was no connection, trip or swab gas
recorded.

System : Permian (Upper)

Group : Zechstein
Formation : Hewett
Member : -
Interval : 1,870.7 m to 1,892 m MDBRT (-1,830.3 m to -1,851.6 m TVDSS).
Pick Criteria : The top of the formation was marked by a sharp decrease in GR
and the incoming of clean Sandstones in the cuttings.
Lithology : The section consists of interbedded Sandstone and Claystone.
Lithology : The Sandstone is predominantly seen as loose quartz, colourless
Description to orange, fine to coarse, sub angular to rounded. The Claystone is
light grey green, soft to firm and sub blocky.
Drilling / : This Hewett Formation was drilled vertically with no problems.
Directional Well TD was called at stand down after LWD-Resistivity had
confirmed the Hewett to be water bearing. Maximum inclination
through the Hewett recorded 0.89 degrees. The 7” liner was run
without problems to 1,888m MDBRT.
Formation Gas : Average total gas was 0.26 % and maximum total gas was 0.43%.
Average C1 1905ppm, C2 54ppm, C3 51ppm, iC4 2ppm, nC4
3ppm, iC5 5ppm and nC5 15ppm. A trip gas at TD recorded
12.1% total gas. There was no connection or swab gas recorded.

9. HYDROCARBON INDICATIONS
9.1 Oil shows
All samples were examined using the UV light and tested with solvent (propanol) for cut
coloration under UV and natural light. The reservoir sands were seen as predominantly
loose quartz in the samples and commonly flushed. When the sandstones appeared as
friable cuttings, dolomitic cement was common resulting in mineral fluorescence, masking
oil shows. Only very weak oil shows were observed in the cuttings samples.
No oil was seen on top of the liquid in the cuttings skips, in the mud pits or on the
shakers. Oil checks in mud samples were negative while drilling the 8 ½” section. From
the MDT pressure profile it was evident that a 11.6m oil leg was present. This was
supported by the SWCs from the Volpriehausen in which good oil shows were observed.
The SWCs were only inspected visually onsite, no chemicals were added and the surface
was not cleaned. Mud samples taken after reaching well TD showed oil contamination of
3100ppm.
Cuttings
Depth / Interval
Odour Staining Direct Fluorescence Cut Fluorescence
(m) MDBRT
1712m Spotted (10%) pale no cut fluorescence, no

none none
(cuttings) orange brown ring
1715m-1742m Trace pale orange no cut fluorescence, no

none none
(cuttings) brown ring
Spotted (25%) pale no cut fluorescence, no

1745m (cuttings) none none
yellow brown ring
1751m-1766m Trace to 5% pale no cut fluorescence, no

none none
(cuttings) yellow brown ring
Rotary Sidewall Cores

Depth / Interval
Odour Staining Direct Fluorescence Cut Fluorescence
(m) MDBRT
Spotted orange-brown
1709.25 faint none n/a
(contamination?)
1716.0 faint none Even pale yellow n/a


Dark brown-black
1732.25 faint Spotted pale yellow n/a
residual oil
Spotted (5%) dull
yellow
Streaked (30%) bright
yellow
Spotted (trace) pale
yellow
1742.5 faint none Even pale-dull yellow n/a
Spotted (10%) pale

yellow
Spotted (5%) pale-dull
yellow
1746.2 faint none Even pale yellow n/a
Trace residual Streaked (10%) pale-

1750.0 faint n/a
dark brown-black dull yellow
Live medium
1751.0 faint Spotted pale-dull yellow n/a
brown oil
Even bright yellow-
1753.0 faint Live light brown oil n/a
white
Even bright yellow-
white
Even bright yellow-
white
1760.8 Even bright yellow-
faint none n/a
(photo 1&2) white
1763.3 faint none Even dull-bright yellow n/a
Live light to
1764.5 faint Even bright yellow n/a
medium brown oil
spotted live light
1766.1 faint Even pale-dull yellow n/a
brown oil
Streaked dull-bright
yellow
Patchy oil Patchy to even bright
1769.8 faint n/a
bleeding yellow
1776.4 faint none Even dull-bright yellow n/a
1782.5 spotted medium

faint Spotted pale-dull yellow n/a
(photo 3) brown oil bleeding
1786.0 Spotted dark Spotted (5%) pale-dull
faint n/a
(photo 4) brown oil bleeding yellow
Spotted (5%) pale
yellow

Photo 1: SWC from 1,760.8m under normal light. Photo 2: SWC from 1,760.8 under UV light.
Photo 3: SWC from 1,782.5m under normal light. Photo 4: SWC from 1,786.0m under normal light.
9.2 Recorded gas
The gas was monitored by International Logging using a total gas detector via a
standard de-gasser and a direct-gas in mud total system. A Varian high-speed
chromatograph (C1-C5 / 30s) was used for gas compositional breakdown. All gas
systems were thoroughly inspected and calibrated before the start of the 26” hole
section and checked / calibrated thereafter on a regular basis. There were no significant
gas readings recorded until 1,325m MDBRT.
The following problems with the gas recordings were experienced:

• In general: the position of the gas trap is not in a favorable position on the GSF
Labrador and is very much affected by changes in the level in the header box
which occur regularly. Continuous attention and a good communication are
required between the mudlogging crew and the shaker hand. Due to the high drill

rates it is difficult to maintain a continuous reliable gas measurement. Between

1,210m and 1,325m MDBRT no significant gas readings were recorded.
Considering the sudden jump from 0 to 240 ppm at 1,325 m MDBRT, the gas
readings between 1,210m and 1,325m are questionable.
• First accurate gas data recorded downhole from 1325m MDBRT.
• From 1,584m to 1,670m MDBRT gas levels are relatively low and questionable
(low level in header box or ditch line partly blocking?).
• From 1,704m to 1,723m MDBRT (top Volpriehausen reservoir gas leg) gas data
was lost / unreliable due to a data acquisition server error.
Below is a summary of the gas readings throughout well P11-06.
Formation / Zonal Averages Average Gas Chromatograph

Depth Depth Ave Ave Total
C1 C2 C3 iC4 nC4 iC5 nC5
(m) (m) ROP Bgrd Max
(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
MD MD m/hr (%) (%)
146 769.3 34.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
769.3 1327.7 28.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1327.7 1353.5 10.4 0.02 0.03 234 8 6 0 0 0 0
1353.5 1397.9 27.0 0.07 0.20 574 19 13 0 0 0 0
1397.9 1467.1 31.2 0.26 0.70 2399 138 94 1 1 0 0
1467.1 1539.8 31.4 0.51 0.94 3851 306 230 11 11 2 1
1539.8 1701.9 25.2 0.38 3.14 2771 307 231 31 41 10 9
1701.9 1800.8 33.0 4.28 13.71 27664 3515 3548 183 283 75 89
1800.8 1870.7 33.2 0.28 0.89 1789 79 76 10 21 18 33
1870.7 1892.0 37.1 0.26 0.43 1905 54 51 2 3 5 15
Volpriehasuen Reservoir: Gas Leg

MD MD m/hr (%) (%)
1701.9 1751.8 31.6 5.39 13.71 31701 2757 2755 102 136 27 27
Volpriehasuen Reservoir: Moveable Oil Leg

MD MD m/hr (%) (%)
1751.8 1763.4 31.5 4.50 6.29 32841 5169 5247 310 480 124 135

Volpriehasuen Reservoir: Residual Oil Leg (Non Moveable)

MD MD m/hr (%) (%)
1763.4 1785.4 32.1 3.69 8.58 27390 4931 5003 291 466 120 149
Volpriehasuen Reservoir: Water Leg

MD MD m/hr (%) (%)
1785.4 1800.8 39.0 2.30 7.38 13798 2185 2214 144 247 96 125
Gas Peaks
Depth Ave Ave Total

Peak C1 C2 C3 iC4 nC4 iC5 nC5
(m) ROP Bgrd Max
Type (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
MD m/hr (%) (%)
Drilling 1678 9.6 0.7 3.14 37664 3918 2986 377 507 158 157
Drilling 1728 32.4 4.6 13.71 99062 8731 8854 354 468 91 92
Drilling 1761 25.2 4.9 5.96 41650 7657 7760 466 728 244 180
Drilling 1783 33.1 3.0 8.58 56826 9930 10053 507 817 213 273
Trip 1892 n/a --- 12.1 --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
H2S & CO2
There were no indications of H2S or CO2 recorded while drilling the P11-06 well.
Pixler Plots
Please refer to Appendix B for the Pixler Plots of the 4 drilled gas peaks listed above.
The Pixler plots do not show a clear oil or gas hydrocarbon signature, but instead the gas
ratios line plot across both oil and gas zones, although there is an increasing trend
towards oil with increasing depth.

10. PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE ENVIRONMENT
10.1 Formation pressure
Datalog mudlogging concluded the P11-06 well to be normally pressured throughout

from:
• No swab, no connection and no trip gas peaks were recorded.
• Temperature data recorded a normal trend with vertical depth.
• No pressure cavings seen of claystone/argillaceous intervals.
• D Exponent shows a normal trend through the 12 ¼” and 8 ½” hole sections (see
below).
P11-06 (Van Ghent) - 12 1/4" & 8 1/2" section
10.0
Dexp
1.0
Dcexp
0.1
1370 1470 1570 1670 1770 1870
In the 8 ½” hole, the formation pressure was measured directly in the Volpriehausen and
Hewett Formations using the Schlumberger MDT tool – see table below.
Formation Pore
Temperature
MDBRT (m) TVDSS (m) Pressure Pressure Remarks
(°C)
(bara) (g/cm3)
1708.0 1667.6 174.518 1.067 67.7 Good Pretest
1713.0 1672.6 174.607 1.064 67.5 Good Pretest
1716.5 1676.1 174.668 1.062 67.7 Good Pretest

1719.5 1679.1 174.685 1.061 67.9 Good Pretest

1723.0 1682.6 174.730 1.059 68.1 Good Pretest
1728.0 1687.6 174.810 1.056 68.4 Good Pretest
1733.2 1692.8 174.889 1.053 68.6 Good Pretest
1742.5 1702.1 175.021 1.048 69.0 Good Pretest
1746.5 1706.1 175.102 1.046 69.3 Good Pretest
1751.0 1710.6 175.159 1.044 69.7 Good Pretest
1755.2 1714.8 175.378 1.043 70.4 Good Pretest
1758.3 1717.9 175.563 1.042 70.8 Good Pretest
1763.5 1723.1 175.919 1.041 71.0 Good Pretest
1766.5 1726.1 176.287 1.041 71.0 Good Pretest
1767.0 1726.6 177.452 1.048 71.1 Not stable
1775.5 1735.1 177.187 1.041 71.3 Good Pretest
1777.5 1737.1 177.490 1.042 71.2 Good Pretest
1786.0 1745.6 178.168 1.040 71.4 Good Pretest
1797.5 1757.1 179.219 1.040 71.7 Good Pretest
1871.0 1830.6 - - - Dry test
1871.4 1831.0 186.439 1.038 73.9 Good Pretest
1879.0 1838.6 187.241 1.038 74.3 Good Pretest
1884.0 1843.6 187.792 1.038 74.7 Good Pretest
1733.2 1692.8 174.902 1.053 70.2 Good Pretest
1751.8 1711.4 175.182 1.043 69.8 Good Pretest
1753.0 1712.6 175.237 1.043 70.2 Good pretest
1756.3 1715.9 175.490 1.043 70.7 Good Pretest
1760.8 1720.4 175.734 1.041 71.0 Good Pretest
10.2 Fracture pressure
The 12 ¼” hole section was drilled to 800m MDBRT (-760m TVDSS) and a LOT was
performed to the equivalent mud weight of 1.68sg.
In the 8 ½” hole section no FIT or LOT was performed.
10.3 Temperature
The P10/P11 area lies within a normal temperature regime with a geothermal gradient of
3.3 °C / 100m, which is based on well P11-03.

In well P11-06 the temperature was directly measured in the Volpriehausen and Hewett
Formations, using the Schlumberger MDT-tool (see section 10.1) with a maximum MDT
temperature of 76.8 °C recorded at 1831.1m TVDSS (72 hrs after last circulation).
Assuming a water temperature of 6 °C, this indicates a temperature gradient of 3.9 °C /

100m.

11. WELL DATA ACQUISITION SERVICES
Geological data acquisition was primarily acquired using International Logging (Datalog
Technology) mud logging systems, Baker Hughes Inteq MWD and LWD systems and
Schlumberger wireline. These services were all quality controlled and supervised by the
well site geologist. During final TD logging an additional QA from GAIA was present to
witness the wireline logging operations.
11.1 Mudlogging Services
International Logging (formerly Datalog) mud logging services supplied a fitted unit and
crew equipped to monitor Gas, ROP and pit volumes as well as drilling parameters. In
addition International Logging supplied the remote system Wellwizard for monitoring well
data in real time in the rig-site offices. Due to the short duration of the drilling phase no
link to the Petro-Canada office in The Hague was established and also the secure storage
of wellsite data (Wellhub) was not used.
International Logging provided a microscope and a UV box for sample analyses and
produced a mud log and pressure evaluation log. Refer to section 12 for all geological
samples collected.
Overall the service provided by Datalog was reasonable, with a number of issues:
1. During drilling of the 17.1/2” section, the unconsolidated clay and sand in the
upper part were erroneously described as claystone and sandstone.
2. During drilling of the 12.1/4” section, no significant gas readings were recorded
between 1,210m and 1,325m MDBRT. Considering the sudden jump from 0 to
240 ppm at 1,325 m MDBRT, the gas readings between 1,210m and 1,325m are
questionable.
3. From 1,584m to 1,670m MDBRT gas levels are relatively low and questionable
(low level in header box or ditch line partly blocking?).
4. From 1,704m to 1,723m MDBRT (top Volpriehausen reservoir gas leg) gas data
was lost due to a data acquisition server error.
5. Regular inspections of the gas trap were carried out after all significant changes in
background gas levels. The position of the gas trap in the header box was very
unfavorable. The level of fluid dropped often due to changing shaker screens with

loss of gas data. It was advised to change the position of the gas trap to a location
with more constant flow, e.g. the flow line.
6. Pump stroke counter #3 is giving an erratic signal and needed to be simulated.
Prior drilling out the 9.5/8” shoe track all pump stroke counter signals were lost.
PSC #1 and #2 signals were able to reestablish. Problem seemed to be caused
by electronics inside the mudlogging unit. The electronic module is scheduled to
be replaced during the period the rig is at the shipyard in Rotterdam.
7. Bad signal to rig floor monitor due to cable being smashed by moving containers.
8. Logistics: ran out of sample boxes during drilling of the reservoir section, although
boxes already had been ordered when the rig still was in the UK. Boxes arrived
after reaching TD.
9. General unit housekeeping during drilling could be improved.
10. Due to high ROP’s, some samples were missed, but this was understandable.
Datalog Crew
The Datalog crews provided a reasonable service with reasonably good communication
with the Transocean crews and good communication with the Petro-Canada
representatives. One of the unit managers, Cristian Laffineur was also present during the
2006/2007 Petro-Canada drilling campaign. The mudloggers were all relatively new to
International Logging. For most engineers and mud loggers the job lasted only one hitch
due to the short duration of the well.
Communication and reporting
1. WellWizard: the remote link was not in use, only internal rig site connections
were set up. No WITS link between the mudlogging unit and the Baker Hughes
LWD unit was set up. Hence no realtime LWD data could be displayed in
WellWizard in the WSG office on the rig.
2. Wellhub: was not used.
3. Phone Line to unit: Although one was requested, an external phone was not
installed in the mudlogging unit, for the same reasons a data line was not
installed, i.e. length of cable run required, and difficulties in accessing the cable
run. It was seemed as impractical as the rig phone could be used to access
directly an outside line. However the main problem was on phoning into the unit,
as the communication had to be put through from the Radio Room, and the added
difficulties entailed with that route.

11.2 MWD/ LWD
The well was designed as a vertical exploration well and a mud motor and MWD
directional survey tool was used in the 12 ¼” section and a MWD directional tool in the 8
½” section. This service was provided by Baker Hughes INTEQ. Directional and Gamma
Ray (GR) was available in the 12 ¼” section. From 1353m an additional Near-Bit
resistivity tool was run to allow section TD at top reservoir. In the 8 ½” section GR and
Resisitivity was run. Baker Hughes provided a logging unit and crew for this service. The
Sara II system was in use which was capable of decoding at a rate of 3 bps.
Offset Offset Offset

Total Max
Hole Run Start End Tool Data from from from Fail
Service Circ. Temp
Size No. Depth Depth Size Rate bit: bit: bit: Type
Hrs. deg C
Dir GR Res
DIR / 0.5 +
12.1/4” 1 741 1337 9.1/2” 17.35 15.89 - 41.0 57 None
GR 0.24
DIR /
GR / 0.5 +
12.1/4” 2 1334 1704 9.1/2” 7.43 5.97 0.0 29.1 61.1 None
Near- 0.24
Bit-Res
Dir / GR 0.5 +
8.1/2” 3 1699 1889 6.3/4” 5.9 2.9 4.13 13.6 56.6 None
/ Res 0.24
LWD Run #1:

• 19:18hrs 05/04/2008 to 13:22hrs 07/04/2008
• GR and directional service only.
• Good quality RT and memory data. A few small gaps in RT data to 830m MDBRT
due to decoding. 100% Logged from 741m to 1,337m MDBRT. No Problems.
• Power cable for power box required for downloading memory data was broken.
About half an hour rig-time was lost before the rig electrician was finished with
repairs.
LWD Run #2:

• 08:17hrs 08/04/2008 to 05:32hrs 09/04/2008
• GR, directional and Near-Bit resistivity service.
• Good RT and memory data. Not compensated for high KCl content of mud. Only a
small increase in GR values was noted.
• 100% logged from 1,334m to 1,704m MDBRT. No Problems.

• The off-set of the NB-resistivity was set to 0.0m. Due to the use of water-base
mud the actual measuring depth is estimated to be 1m behind bit depth.
LWD Run #3:

• 21:40hrs 11/04/2008 to 10:08hrs 12/04/2008
• Directional, GR and resistivity service.
• Poor detection while drilling shoe track, in open hole sufficient RT data.
• Good memory data. Not compensated for high KCl content of mud.
Data Quality
Throughout the 12 ¼” section RT data were good, apart from a few small gaps down to
830m. At 1,353m MDBRT prior POOH, the hole was displaced to KCL-Gem-Polymer mud
with 65,000 mg/l chlorides, causing a small increase in GR-readings. The NB-resistivity,
although having less character than the standard resistivity tool due to the depth of
investigation, was helpful in identifying the top of the reservoir. The reservoir was
penetrated less than 2m. The memory data was of good quality.
During drilling of the 8 ½” reservoir section, real-time and memory log quality was good in
general.
Crew & Tools

The Baker Hughes Inteq team provided a reasonable service, good communications (on
the rig) throughout were exhibited. The only negatives were that deadlines / timing
forecasts were not always met. All of the MWD/LWD crew were experienced and
exhibited a good understanding of what was needed and expected. The WSG was
informed immediately about the change in NB-resistivity when entering the top of the
Volpriehausen reservoir and a key operational objective was achieved with section TD
1m into the Volpriehausen Formation.
Some issues noticed were:
• At the start of the job a Torx key was missing which was necessary for accessing
the standard programming/dump port. A lot of time during rig-up was lost to
search on the rig for this key, which could not be located prior to running the tool.
The tool was programmed in an unorthodox way by making a straight connection
through the top of the tool. Information from the Baker Hughes base in Celle
stated the tools were never sent, but a day after reaching 12.1/4” section TD, a

complete Torx key box was found on the rig attached to chemicals meant for
cementing.
• Due to the late rig-up and time lost to search for the Torx key, the initial presented
log format was not correct.
• Presenting memory data for the first run was very late. The engineer on night shift
had not been working on it.
• Often incorrect LAS files were issued to the client (applicable to all runs).
• While circulating at 12.1/4” section TD all 3 LWD engineers on board were in the
galley, making it necessary for the directional driller to make a public
announcement to direct one of the engineers back to the LWD unit to record a
directional survey at section TD. It often appears that hand-overs were being held
in the galley instead of the LWD unit.
• One of the bolts holding the dump port cover plate broke off when making up the
8.1/2” assembly, requiring the back-up tool to be picked up.

11.3 Open hole Wireline Logging
Wireline logging was supplied by Schlumberger. Schlumberger provided a logging unit

and a 4 men crew for the intermediate logging in the 12 ¼” section (engineers J.
Espinosa and M. DeVinney and 2 operators). A 6-man crew was onboard for the TD
wireline logging operation (engineers J. Espinosa and V. Mukhin plus 4 operators). There
was also a SWC specialist (R. Lagestee). No additional MDT specialist was provided, but
M. Zeegers of the regular crew covered this role. Oilphase were employed to provide the
pressurized sample transfer at the surface and 2 engineers were provided.
Interval
Tool (Tool Length) /
Run Dates Logged
Remarks
MDBRT
DSI-TLD-PPC-GR (29.12m)
74m
Tool string holding up at 1687.2m (17m off bottom). Logged GR-
1A 09/04/2008 to
DSI through 30" / 13 3/8" casing to seabed. Repeat section from
1,687m
1450m -1312m MDBRT.
12/04/2008 1,455m SP-DSI-HRLA-TLD-CNL-MCFL-HNGS-CAL (40.44m)

2A to to Repeat section from 1840m - 1703m. SP showed some character
13/04/2008 1,892.5m without much response. Good hole condition.
FMI-GPIT-GR (12.13m)
1,695m
Good hole condition. The section was logged 3 times covering
2B 13/04/2008 to
whole interval using different pad forces to cover sections with
1,892.5m
poor pad contact and sections with too much pull.
MDT-pressures (12.45m) + 1 re-run

Tool was set-up for taking pressures only due to limited time in
advance to prepare the sample bottles. Good hole condition. At
1200m tool was pulled to surface to check PS and PQ gauges. In
13/04/2008 1,708m
2C total 28 Pre-tests taken at 24 requested depths. 2 Tests showed
to to
tight formation and were repeated with good result by moving the
14/04/2008 1,884m
tool ± 0.5m. A second test at 1733.2m was repeated for QC
purposes and one was taken by mistake at 1777.5m. Probe failed
initially at 1758.3m, but after cycling the solenoid valves several
times it became operational again.

MDT-sampling (37.82m)
Tool was set up with 6 SPMC, 6 MPSR and 1x1 gallon chambers.
The Quicksilver probe was used but due to the high drawdown
14/04/2008 1,754.5m
only one pump could be used and the flow could not be split. 6
2D to to
SPMC samples were taken in the oil leg, 2 at 1755.2m and 4 at
15/04/2008 1,755.2m
1754.5m. During pumping at 1733.2m prior taking gas samples,
the pump action deteriorated and the string was pulled to surface
for servicing the pump.
VSI-GR (11.38m)
519m
Good quality data from 1892m to 727m. From 727m quality of
2E 15/04/2008 to
data degrading and from 519m no usable data acquisition due to
1,892m
interference of casing.
MDT-sampling (37.82m)
6 MPSR samples (gas) taken at 1733.2m. Leaking seal valve of
1,733.2m
upper MRMS caused 2 gas samples taken without overpressure. 2
2F 15/04/2008 to
MPSR samples (water) taken at 1797.5m (Volpriehausen Fm) and
1,871.4m
2 MPSR samples (water) taken at 1871.4m (Hewett Fm). All
samples taken with Quicksilver probe.
MSCT (12.97m) + 2 re-runs
Performed check trip prior coring run to circulate out hydrocarbons
produced during MDT-sampling. Unable to run tool into open hole.
POOH to install hole-finder. RIH without major problems. After
16/04/2008 1,708m
2G cutting 6 cores it was seen that the coring head was not retracting
to to
properly. POOH after 7 SWC's taken. One core was lost. Modified
17/04/2008 1,878.6m
tool and removed debris, RIH. Cut 44 cores, retrieved 34 cores.
40 cores recovered out of the 51 cores attempted. Recovery was
very good recovery with the majority of cores between 4.0cm to
4.5cm and only one recorded as broken at the analysis laboratory.
Depth Control
Run 1A was used as the primary depth control log. The main log depth was correlated
with the down log, following Schlumberger’s first RIH procedures and applying all the
necessary corrections, e.g. stretch, temperature, length of cable between rig and unit,
block height, etc. The log reference was set to the rotary table.
Level Drillers Loggers
Top Vlieland 1,539.0m MDBRT 1,539.3m MDBRT

13 3/8” Casing 793.9m MDBRT 793.0m MDBRT

9 5/8” Casing 1,703.0m MDBRT 1,703.0m MDBRT

TD 1,892.0m MDBRT 1,892.5m MDBRT
Mud Properties
Section 12 ¼” 8 ½”
Mud type KCl-Gem-Polymer Salt (KCl/NaCl)-polymer
Mud weight (sg) 1.20 @ 45 deg. C 1.22 @ 40 deg. C
Viscosity (s) 46 41
pH 8.7 @ 20 deg. C 9.4 @ 25 deg. C
Fluid Loss (cm3) 5 3.4
Chlorides (mg/l) 64,000 172,000
KCl (kg/m3) 95,000 120,000
Barite (mg/m3) 122.1 Not recorded
Rm (ohm.m) 0.05 @ 56.6 °C (*) 0.045 @ 10 °C
Rmf (ohm.m) 0.04 @ 56.6 °C (*) 0.041 @ 10 °C
Rmc (ohm.m) - @ - °C 0.061 @ 10 °C

Note: (*) Resistivity measured by BHI in the 12 ¼” section.
Temperature and circulation details

Time since Maximum Recorded Depth
Run Tool String
Circulation Temperature (°C) m MDBRT
1A DSI-TLD-PPC-GR 08hrs 35mins 64 1,687.0

SP-DSI-HRLA-TLD-CNL-
2A 09hrs 40mins 69 1,892.5
MCFL-HNGS-CAL
2B FMI-GPIT-GR 15hrs 10mins 73 1,892.5
2C MDT-GR pressures 26hrs 10mins 74.7 1,884.0
2D MDT-GR sampling 47hrs 30mins 72.7 1,758.3
2E VSI-GR 62hrs 20mins 76 1,892.5
2F MDT-GR sampling 72hrs 10 mins 76.8 1,871.4
2G MSCT-GR 07hrs 30mins 76 1,878.6


11.3.1 12 ¼” hole section logging summary
The Schlumberger logging crew arrived on the GSF Labrador on April 08th 2007. After an
initial safety meeting and rig induction, the unit was prepared for logging operations. It
appeared that the test module for diagnostics was faulty. Several electronic boards were
changed out without success. A replacement as well as a complete WFAD (acquisition
module) was ordered and transported to the rig by first available helicopter. The DSV and
WSG were not informed about this ad-hoc delivery and found out during the regular
morning call from the office team. The replacement WFAD was installed shortly before
rigging up the sheaves, leaving little time for checking the tools.
The rigging up of run number 1A began at 15:15 hrs April 9th 2008, preceded by a 15
minutes safety-meeting. The tools were successfully checked and calibrated as
witnessed by the well site geologist.
Run 1A: DSI-TLD-PPC-GR
After pre-calibrations and loading the nuclear sources, the tool string was RIH to 794m
where the down log started to 1,450m. At this depth the calipers were opened and the
repeat pass made to 1,312m. After closing the calipers, the tool string was RIH and while
logging to bottom the tool hung up at 1,687m, 17m above section TD. Several attempts
were made to pass this point but the tool was unable to pass, making logging the main
log only possible from 1,687m. The open hole section was logged without problems and
continued inside the 13 3/8” casing to the seabed (GR and sonic). The overall data quality
was good with poor sonic data inside the casing due to poor cement bond, making re-
processing recommendable.
The 12 ¼” wireline logging operations were witnessed by the wellsite geologist, Henk van
Gastel and the time breakdown is included in Appendix H. Key observations from the
Wellsite Geologist witnessing the acquisition:
• No mud check (resistivity measurements) had been carried out prior the logging
run.
• No barrier in place at the bottom of the stairs to the rig floor prior loading nuclear
sources. Announcement regarding handling these sources was not widely heard.
• Tool was holding up at 1687.2m MDBRT (17m off bottom), unable to pass.

• At top Vlieland Claystone the wireline depth was 0.3m deeper than the LWD-GR
depth, and well within tolerance.
• The hole size correction during logging up the main and repeat pass was not set
to caliper size, but to bit size.
• High frequency monopole mode for P&S to improve data quality.
• Good repeatability of log data.
Time breakdown:
Level Duration Cumulative Time
Run #1A: Logging Ops Start 15:00hrs 9th April 2008
Safety meeting 15 mins 15 mins
Rig up / load sources etc. 1hr 35mins 1 hrs 50 mins
RIH 30 mins 2 hrs 20 mins
Logging 4 hrs 45 mins 7 hrs 5 mins
POOH 5 mins 7 hrs 10 mins
Rig Down / unload sources 1hr 20 mins 8 hrs 30 mins
th
Logging Ops finished 23:30 hrs 9 April 2008
Run 1A: Total Time 8 hrs 30 mins
Run 1A: Down Time None
11.3.2 8 ½” hole section logging summary
The wireline operations were witnessed by Ian Barwick of Gaia-Earth Sciences Limited
and supported by the wellsite geologist, Henk Van Gastel. The VSP was witnessed and
QC’d by the borehole seismic specialist, Martin Ellis from RPS.
The 8 ½” logging on well P11-06 was a safe and successful logging job and the logging
operations are fully documented in Appendix I, Gaia Earth Science wireline witness report
(Runs 2A, 2B, 2C, 2E, 2F, 2G, 2H) and Appendix J, RPS Energy Borehole Seismic
witness report (Run 2d).
Formation Sampling & Acquisition Summary (Runs 2D & 2F)
Based upon the pre-test data the following samples were required:
• 2 x water samples at 1871.4m MDBRT (Hewett), using 450cc multi-phase sample
chambers.

• 2 x water samples at 1797.5m MDBRT (Volpriehausen), using 450cc multi phase

sample chambers.
• 6 x gas zone samples at 1733.2m MDBRT (Volpriehausen), using 450cc multi phase
sample chambers.
• 4 x oil zone samples at 1754.5m MDBRT, using 250cc single phase pressurised
chambers.
• 2 x oil zone samples at 1755.2m MDBRT (Volpriehausen), using 250cc single phase
pressurised chambers.
Cleanup
Sample Fluid Type Depth (MD) P (form) P (hyd) Mobility
(l/mins)
1 Oil 1755.2 175.55 215.32 15 391 ltr/ 210 min
2 Oil 1754.5 175.47 215.29 23 141 ltr/ 256 min
3 Gas 1733.2 175.11 212.55 461.7 288 ltr/ 165 min
4 Water 1797.5 179.40 219.83 203.2 288 ltr/ 165 min
5 Water 1871.4 186.63 228.92 322.1 288 ltr/ 165 min
OCM
Temp Flowing Max. Shut-in GOR
Depth Predicted
Sample Chamber No. (deg. Pressure Drawdown Pressure (m3/
(MD) Contam.
C) (bara) (bara) (bara) m3)
(%)
1a 1755.2 MS1_SPMC-6 #585 72.5 115 60 275 n/a 120
1b 1755.2 MS1_SPMC-2 #149 72.6 113 62 273 n/a 115
2a 1754.5 MS2_SPMC-6 #090 72.9 140 35.5 190 n/a 120
2b 1754.5 MS2_SPMC-2 #047 72.9 138 37.5 230 n/a 120
2c 1754.5 MS1_SPMC-3 #510 76.8 138 37.5 190 n/a 120
2d 1754.5 MS2_SPMC-3 #075 76.8 188.8 2.3 273 n/a 120
3a 1733.2 MS1_MPSR-3 #0155 71.6 174.7 0.5 100 n/a n/a
3b 1733.2 MS1_MPSR-6 #0135 71.6 174.7 0.5 100 n/a n/a
3c 1733.2 MS2_MPSR-1 #3261 71.8 174.7 0.5 60 n/a n/a
3d 1733.2 MS2_MPSR-5 #0153 71.8 174.7 0.5 60 n/a n/a
3e 1733.2 MS1_MPSR-4 #3258 71.9 174.5 0.7 130 n/a n/a
3f 1733.2 MS1_MPSR-1 #3013 71.9 174.5 0.7 120 n/a n/a
4a 1797.5 MS1_MPSR-2 #0112 74.3 176.6 2.8 260 n/a n/a
4b 1797.5 MS2_MPSR-6 #3346 74.3 176.6 2.8 260 n/a n/a
5a 1871.4 MS2_MPSR-2 #3252 76.5 186.0 0.6 250 n/a n/a
5c 1871.4 MS2_MPSR-3 #3256 76.5 186.0 0.6 240 n/a n/a


Comments
¾ MPSR #3261 & #0153 (Gas leg, 1733.2m MDBRT): faulty seal, only 60 Bar Over-
Pressure.
¾ MPSR #3346 (Volpriehausen Water leg, 1797.5m MDBRT): taken with ‘faulty’
MRMS but Over-Pressured OK.
¾ MPSR #3252 & #3256 (Hewett Water leg, 1871.4m MDBRT): taken with ‘faulty’
MRMS but Over-Pressured OK.
Oilphase pressurized sample transfer summary
Transfer Final
P opening Bottle
Depth Cond. Pressure Bottle Sample
Serial No. (bara @ T Serial
(MD) (bara @ T (bara @ T Type* Vol. (cc)
deg C) No.
deg C) deg C)
Single
1755.2 #585 324 @ 12 276 @ 73 276 @ 12 5253-EA 230
Phase
Single
1755.2 #149 317 @ 12 276 @ 73 276 @ 12 2069-EA 230
Phase
Single
1754.5 #090 317 @ 12 276 @ 73 276 @ 12 10319-MA 230
Phase
Single
1754.5 #047 290 @ 6 276 @ 73 276 @ 12 0818-EA 225
Phase
Single
1754.5 #510 310 @ 12 276 @ 73 276 @ 12 2390-EA 240
Phase
Single
1754.5 #075 324 @ 6 276 @ 73 276 @ 12 2473-EA 230
Phase
*Serial bottle numbers referenced in the Core Laboratories PVT analysis report.

Logging Operations Summary
Total wireline operations logging time (including down time):

• Total Logging Time (12.1/4” hole section): 8hrs 30 mins (9th April 2008)
• Total Logging Time (8.1/2” hole section): 97hrs 45mins (12th to 17th February
2007)
Time (Hrs:Mins)
Run No. Service From To
TOT DNPT NPT OP LT
DSI-HRLA-
19:30 02:45
2A TLD-CNL- 08:45 00:00 00:00 08:45 00:00
12-Apr 13-Apr
HNGS-SP
FMI-GPIT-GR- 02:45 08:30 13-
2B 05:45 00:00 00:00 05:45 00:00
ECRD 13-Apr Apr
MDT 08:30 00:30
2C 16:00 00:00 00:00 16:00 01:10
Pressures 13-Apr 14-Apr
00:30 01:00
2D MDT Samples 24:30 00:00 00:00 24:30 04:20
14-Apr 15-Apr
01:00 06:30
2E VSI-GR 05:30 00:00 00:00 05:30 00:00
15-Apr 15-Apr
06:30 00:15
2F MDT Samples 17:45 00:00 02:30 17:45 04:15
15-Apr 16-Apr
11:00 01:15
2G MSCT-GR 14:15 00:00 02:00 14:15 02:00
16-Apr 17-Apr
01:15 06:30
2H CBL-CCL-GR 05:15 00:00 00:00 05:15 00:00
17-Apr 17-Apr
OVERALL JOB TOTALS 97:45 00:00 04:30 97:45 11:45
OVERALL SCHLUMBERGER EFFICIENCY

88.0%
[1-LT/OT]x 100%
TOT - Total Operation Time

OP - Operation Time = TOT-(NPT+DNPT)
LT - Lost Time against Schlumberger
NPT - Wireline related Non-Productive Time not recorded against Schlumberger
DNPT - Drilling related Non-Productive Time not recorded against Schlumberger

Downtime Summary
Logging START END

DNPT NPT LT COMMENT
Run TIME TIME
It was noted that the strain and

quartz gauges in the MDT were
2C - - 00:40 12:00 12:40 reading differently. Tool was pulled
to surface and gauges flushed with
silicon oil
MDT failed to set at 1758.3m. It

was believed to be a solenoid valve
issue in the MRPS (standard
2C - - 00:30 17:00 17:30
probe). The valves were cycled a
number of times downhole and the
tool began to work again
Pump-out module started to ‘short-

2D - - 04:20 20:40 01:00 stroke’. MDT pulled to surface for
service
Replacing the full SPMC tanks with

2F - 02:30 - 06:30 09:00 empty MPSR tanks (additional to
programme)
Continued NPT for ‘short-stroking’

2F - - 03:30 09:00 12:30 pump as tool is run back in hole on
Run 2F
Seal valve failure on the Upper

MRMS during gas sampling.
2F - - 00:45 14:15 15:00 Caused two gas pressures to be
taken with no over-pressure. Seal
valve worked during water samples.
MSCT unable to pass 1708m. Pull

2G - 02:00 - 12:40 14:40
out of hole to install hole-finder.
MSCT Bit Box would not fully rotate

2G - - 02:00 16:00 18:00
to ‘eject’

Highlights included:
• Determination of the pressure gradients present and the identification of the fluid
contacts.
• The performance of Quick-silver during the gas & water sampling
• Good petrophysical data obtained.
• The flexibility and adaptability of the Schlumberger personnel to deal with the
demands of a changing logging schedule.
• An 80% recovery of the rotary SWCs provided adequate coverage of all zones of
interest.
• Obtaining quality water samples (to be determined after analysis)
Lowlights included:
• The inability to use the Quick-Silver full capability during the clean-up prior to oil
sampling.
• Confusion over the MDT specialist role. The Schlumberger crews were under the
impression that a dedicated MDT Specialist would arrive on the rig on 13th April.
This was not the case so Marco Zeegers, the night shift Crew-Chief also had to
cover the MDT maintenance work.
• Unit 480 is not yet modified to allow more than 8,000 lbs to be pulled by the winch.
Not being able to pull the SWL of the logging cable increase the chances of
getting tools stuck.
• The second Logging Crew and majority of logging tools only arrived on the rig a
matter of hours before the job began.
Technical Recommendations from the Wireline Witness
• Investigate the cause of the discrepancy in the gauge readings while running in
hole for Run 2C.
• Investigate the cause of the failure of the MRPS to open during Run 2C. The
Engineer did manage to get the tool operational again by cycling the solenoids
while the tool was down-hole. The likely cause of this malfunction is that debris
bluffed the solenoids which then consequently cleared down-hole so a definitive
answer may not be found.

• For future jobs with similar mobilities it should be ensured that the Quick-Silver is
configured with an Extra High Pressure Displacement Unit above the probe and a
High Pressure Displacement Unit below the probe. This would allow for slower
pumping that may enable the both pumps to be used simultaneously resulting in a
quicker, better clean up for the oil samples. The down side to this is that pumping
would be slower in the highly mobile water and gas formations.
• Investigate the cause of the Seal-Valve failure in MRMS 93 during the gas
sampling.
• Investigate the cause of the pump-out unit ‘short-stroking’ during the oil and gas
sampling during Run 2D.
• It should be noted that there was uncertainty over one of the MPSR tanks used
during Run 2F. It was decided not to sample into MPSR 3343 as the valve may
have opened during Run 2C, the status of the tank was uncertain. This was
probably the Engineer being over cautious because there were other tanks
available and there was no absolute necessity to utilise this tank.
• Investigate why the FMI calipers were out of tolerance during the casing check
after logging Run 2B. The caliper readings were 9.05” & 9.30” inside 8.681” ID
casing.
• The data products such as LAS, PDS and composite logs were slow in being
provided and the LAS files had to be corrected a number of times, e.g. wrapped
data in LAS files. The programme was very specific in the requirements so there
should have been no confusion. Although it should be noted that the lack of
preparation time that was afforded to the crews before this job may have been a
factor.
• Thermometers need to be spun down before every run, no matter if the

temperature on subsequent runs is expected to be higher. Borehole temperature
is vital data and needs to be recorded accurately.
Personnel Recommendations from the Wireline Witness
• An explanation should be provided to Petro-Canada over the confusion of who

was to cover the MDT Specialist role. It is not ideal having a Crew Chief covering

the MDT work as well due to him being restricted by the day/night shift pattern.
Had Marco Zeegers known from the outset that he would be covering the MDT
Specialist role better preparations would have been made. This issue definitely
cost 2 ½ hours when MDT maintenance work was still going on at the completion
of the VSI, it also made it necessary to run an additional MDT Pressure only pass
due to the MPSR tanks not being installed.
• MDT sampling jobs should have two Engineers assigned that are fully competent
to cover their shifts. At no point during the job did Javier complete any sampling
which meant Vladimir worked very long hours. Whether Javier is competent at
MDT sampling or not is unknown but it is not acceptable to have one Engineer
covering a job that had at least 12 samples planned.
11.4 Cased Hole Wireline Logging
The wireline run 1A logged the 12.1/4” section in open hole and continued logging
gamma ray and sonic data through 13.3/8” and 30” casing to seabed.
At well TD, the last wireline run after the open hole logging programme and prior running
the 7” liner was the CBL-CCL tool which was run across the 9.5/8” casing (run #2H). Top
of good cement was recorded at 933m MDBRT.

12. GEOLOGICAL SAMPLES
12.1 Drill Cuttings
The drill cuttings sampling programme is summarised below:
Sample Well Bore Interval (MDBRT) &

Sample Sets Destination
Frequency / interval
Type
140m – 540m : 30m interval

(First returns to near base
Tertiary)
Set #1A Petro-Canada storage

540m – 1,280m : 10m interval
unwashed (500g facility;
(near Top Landen to intra ‘Fast’
min)
Chalk)
Panterra Geoconsultants
Set #1B B.V.
1,280m – 1,670m : 5m interval
washed & dried Weversbaan 1-3
(intra ‘Fast’ Chalk to intra
(50g min) 2352 BZ Leiderdorp
Vlieland)
1,670m – 1,892m : 3m interval

(intra Vlieland to TD)
Cuttings 140m – 540m : 30m interval
(First returns to near base
Tertiary)
Set #2A
540m – 1,280m : 10m interval
unwashed (500g TNO NITG
(near Top Landen to intra ‘Fast’
min) Leeweriklaan 14
Chalk)
Bedrijvenpark Zeist west
Set #2B 3704 GR Zeist
1,280m – 1,670m : 5m interval
washed & dried
(intra ‘Fast’ Chalk to intra
(50g min)
Vlieland)
1,670m – 1,892m : 3m interval

(intra Vlieland to TD)
2 x 197 depth samples were collected, with only 9 depths missed due to high ROP´s.
Missing samples are as follows (all depths MDBRT): 900m, 1,715m, 1,721m, 1,727m,
1,736m, 1,748m, 1,760m, 1,862m and 1,868m.

12.2 Biostratigraphy Samples
No samples for biostratigraphic analysis were taken.
12.3 Cores
No conventional cores were cut on the P11-06 well.
12.4 Sidewall Cores
50 sidewall cores were planned with the Schlumberger rotary side wall core tool, MSCT.
48 SWC’s were selected in the Volpriehausen and 2 SWC’s in the Hewett Formation.
The MSCT was RIH three times. On first attempt it was unable to run the tool into open
hole and it was necessary to pull the tool back to surface to install a hole-finder (finger-
type). During the second run the tool was successfully run in open hole and the coring
programme started. After 6 cores taken it was noticed that the core bit was not retracting
properly and these indications continued during cutting the 7th core and it was decided to
pull the tool to surface for inspection. One core was lost (1,757.4m MDBRT). Debris was
removed and a slight modification to the tool carried out (remove springs) and the tool
was run back in and the coring programme resumed.
In total 51 attempts were made, with 40 good SWC’s being recovered. The missed core
from the 2nd run was attempted and successfully cut during the 3rd run.
The wellsite geologist was under instruction to provide a very basic description of the
cores so as not to damage them and make sure they were securely packaged for
transporting to COREX in Aberdeen. The wellsite geologists descriptions are included in
section 9.7 of the GAIA logging report (Appendix I). The lithologal & U.V. fluorescence
descriptions in the table below were made after the conventional core analysis in the
laboratory at COREX.
SWC U.V. fluorescence

MDBRT TVDSS Formation Recovered Lithological Description
# Descriptions
Gy sst. Lt gry/grn, fn gr, fri.

1 1800.0 1759.6 Volpriehausen 4.6cm Pred qtz w ltl fspar. Poss No Show
mtx supported.
2 1792.3 1751.9 Volpriehausen 4.7cm Pred qtz w ltl fspar. Poss No Show
mtx supported.
4.6cm, Gy sst. Lt gry/grn, fn gr, fri. Speckled yellow/orange
3 1776.4 1736.0 Volpriehausen Pred qtz w sps dk nod. fluorescence covering,
broken
Poss cly mtx. Broken. approx. 10% of sample

Speckled yellow
4 1767.7 1727.3 Volpriehausen 4.2cm fluorescence throughout
Pred qtz. Poss mtx
sample covering, approx.
supported.
10% of sample
Yellow fluorescence
Gy sst. Lt gry, fn gr, fri.
5 1763.3 1722.9 Volpriehausen 3.8cm throughtout sample
Pred qtz. Poss gr
covering approx. 5% of
supported.
surface
Yellow fluorescence
Pred qtz. Poss mtx
covering approx. 25% of
supported.
surface
Yellow fluorescence
Gy sst. Lt gry, fn gr, fri. approx. 5% of sample. Low
7 1751.0 1710.6 Volpriehausen 4.0cm Pred qtz. Poss gr intensity yellow
supported. fluorescence throughtout
rest of sample
8 1746.2 1705.8 Volpriehausen 5.0cm Pred qtz w fspr. Poss gr No Show
supported.
No show on exposed
9 1742.5 1702.1 Volpriehausen 3.8cm sandstone. Low
Pred qtz w fspr. Poss gr
orange/yellow fluorescence
supported.
on rest of sample
No show on exposed
10 1738.8 1698.4 Volpriehausen 4.0cm sandstone. Very low
Pred qtz w fspr. Gr
supported.
possibly from drilling mud
No show on exposed
Pred qtz w ltl fspar. Poss
mtx supported.
12 1729.5 1689.1 Volpriehausen missing N/A N/A
No show on exposed
Pred qtz w ltl fspar. Poss
mtx supported.
No show on exposed
Pred qtz w fspr. Gr
supported.
No show on exposed
Pred qtz w fspr. Gr
supported.
1709.2 Gy sst. Lt gry, v fn gr, fri.
16 1668.9 Volpriehausen 4.2cm Dappled orange/brown
Pred qtz. Poss gr
5 fluorescence. Low show
supported.
18 1786.0 1745.6 Volpriehausen 4.5cm Low intensity orange U.V.
Pred qtz. Poss gr
throughout sample
supported.
Speckled yellow
Gy sst. Lt gry, fn gr, fri. fluorescence interspersed
20 1766.1 1725.7 Volpriehausen 4.8cm Pred qtz. Poss mtx throughtout sample
supported. Poss stn pch? covering approx. <5% of
surface area

Yellow fluorescence
Gy sst. Lt gry, v fn gr, fri.
Pred qtz. Poss gr
covering approx. 10-15% of
supported.
surface
Low intensity yellow
Gy sst. Lt gry/wh, v fn gr,
23 1750.0 1709.6 Volpriehausen 4.0cm flourescence throughout.
fri. Pred qtz. Poss gr
Exposed sandstone - mud
supported.
scraped off
Pred qtz w fspr & blk nod.
Exposed sandstone - mud
Poss gr supported.
scraped off
No show on exposed
25 1741.0 1700.6 Volpriehausen 4.5cm sandstone. Low
Pred qtz w fspr & dk nod.
Gr supported.
on rest of sample
No show on exposed
1732.2 sandstone. Very low
27 1691.9 Volpriehausen 4.7cm Pred qtz w fspr & blk
orange/yellow
5 nod. Poss arg lam. Poss
fluorescence possibly
gr supported.
from drilling mud
No show on exposed
sandstone. Very low
29 1725.4 1685.0 Volpriehausen 4.0cm Pred qtz w fspr & blk
orange/yellow
nod. Poss arg lam. Poss
gr supported.
from drilling mud
No show on exposed
Gy sst. Lt gry, v fn gr, fri. sandstone. Very low
30 1721.2 1680.8 Volpriehausen 3.7cm Pred qtz w fspr & dk orange/yellow
nod. Gr supported. fluorescence possibly
from drilling mud
33 1878.6 1838.2 Hewett 4.8cm Pred qtz w fspr & dk
No Show
nod. Poss mtx
supported.
34 1871.6 1831.2 Hewett missing N/A N/A
Gy sst. Lt gry, fn - med
35 1797.3 1756.9 Volpriehausen 4.0cm gr, fri. Pred qtz. Poss No Show
mtx supported.
Gy sst. Lt gry/wh, v fn Orange/yellow
36 1782.5 1742.1 Volpriehausen 3.6cm gr, fri. Pred qtz. Poss gr fluorescence covering
supported. approx. 5% of surface
Speckled yellow
Gy sst. Lt gry/wh, v fn
37 1769.8 1729.4 Volpriehausen 4.0cm fluorescence throughout
gr, fri. Pred qtz. Poss gr
sample covering,
supported.
approx. <5% of surface
38 1764.5 1724.1 Volpriehausen 4.0cm Gy sst. Lt gry, fn gr, fri. Yellow fluorescence
Pred qtz. Poss gr throughtout sample

supported. covering approx. <5% of

surface (one small
patch)
Yellow fluorescence
Pred qtz. Poss gr
covering approx. 10-
supported.
15% of surface
Yellow fluorescence
Gy sst. Lt gry, v fn gr, fri. approx. 5% of sample.
40 1753.0 1712.6 Volpriehausen 4.0cm Pred qtz. Poss gr Low intensity yellow
supported. fluorescence throughtout
rest of sample
Gy sst. Lt gry,fn gr, fri.
Pred qtz. Poss gr
Exposed sandstone -
supported.
mud scraped off
No show on exposed
Gy sst. Lt gry/wh,fn gr, sandstone. Low
42 1744.0 1703.6 Volpriehausen 4.5cm fri. Pred qtz. Gr orange/yellow
supported. fluorescence on rest of
sample
Small patch of yellow
Gy sst. Lt gry/wh,fn gr,
43 1739.1 1698.7 Volpriehausen 4.3cm fluorescence approx.
fri. Pred qtz. Gr
<5%. No show on rest of
supported. Ltl ops.
sample
No show on exposed
Gy sst. Lt gry,fn gr, fri. sandstone. Very low
44 1734.3 1693.9 Volpriehausen 4.0cm Pred qtz. Poss gr orange/yellow
supported. fluorescence possibly
from drilling mud
No show on exposed
Gy sst. Lt gry, fn gr, fri. sandstone. Very low
46 1726.7 1686.3 Volpriehausen 4.4cm Pred qtz w fspr. Poss orange/yellow
mtx supported. fluorescence possibly
from drilling mud
No show on exposed
Gy sst. Gry/grn, med-c
sandstone. Very low
47 1723.0 1682.6 Volpriehausen 4.6cm gr, fri. Pred qtz w ltl
orange/yellow
fspar. Grn lent pth. Poss
mtx supported.
from drilling mud
No show on exposed
Gy sst. Gry/grn, med-c
sandstone. Very low
48 1718.6 1678.2 Volpriehausen 4.0cm gr, fri. Pred qtz w ltl
orange/yellow
fspar. Poss mtx
supported.
from drilling mud
Gy sst. Lt gry/grn, fn gr,
49 1713.6 1673.2 Volpriehausen 3.0cm fri. Pred qtz w sps dk
No Show
nod. Poss cly mtx.
Chipped.
50 1708.0 1667.6 Volpriehausen 4.5cm Pred qtz. Poss gr No Show
supported.

12.5 Formation Fluid Sample
The following samples were collected using the Schlumberger MDT tool. Pressurised
samples were required and Oilphase were contracted to perform the sample transfer to
pressurised chambers on the rig.
• 2 x 250cc using SPMC sample containers from the oil leg at 1,755.2m MDBRT
• 4 x 250cc using SPMC sample containers from the oil leg at 1,754.5m MDBRT
• 6 x 450cc using MPSR sample containers from the gas leg at 1,733.2m MDBRT
• 2 x 450cc using MPSR sample containers from the water leg at 1,797.5m MDBRT
• 2 x 450cc using MPSR sample containers from the water leg at 1,871.4m MDBRT
The samples were delivered to Ewan Thompson at Core Laboratories Limited for PVT
analysis.
12.6 Drilling mud samples
Two 5 litres drilling mud samples and two 5cc mud filtrate samples were collected at well
TD prior to wireline logging. The samples were transported with the formation fluid & gas
samples to Ewan Thomson, Core laboratories Limited, (Howe Moss Drive, Kirkhill Industrial
Estate, Dyce, Aberdeen, AB21 0GL, UK) for calculation of % contamination as part of the
PVT analysis.

13. FIGURES
13.1 Figure 1: Location Map
13.2 Figure 2: Seismic Traverse across P11-06 well path
13.3 Figure 3: Base Vlieland Claystone depth structure map
13.4 Figure 4: Geo-seismic traverse A-A’ (In Line 6820)
13.5 Figure 5: Geo-seismic traverse B-B’ (Cross Line 755)

P11-06 Geological Final Well Report
Location Map
Figure 1
Seismic Traverse along P11-06 Well Path
WNW Van Ghent ESE
Upper North Sea Group
Top Landen
Base Lower North Sea Group
TWT sec.
Chalk Group
Holland Formation
Base Volpriehausen
Vlieland Formation Top Hewett/Fringe
Top Limburg
Top Rotliegendes
Carboniferous
1250 m
Figure 2
Base Vlieland Claystone Depth Structure Map
526800 527200 527600 528000 528400 528800
-1
75
0
00 N
5802800
5802800
-17
B
5802400
5802400
A’
Cr-17
os00
sL
in
e
75
5802000
5802000
50
5
-17
-1650
50
5801600
5801600
-17
-170
P11b Van Ghent 01

0
5801200
5801200
0
70
-1
8 20
5800800
5800800
6
e
in
-1
l
85
-17
I n
0
50
-1
80
A
0
0
-180 -1
5800400
75
5800400
0
B’
-180
5800000
5800000
0
70
0
-1
5799600
5799600
0 100 200 300 400 500m
1:15000
526800 527200 527600 528000 528400 528800
Figure 3
Geo-Seismic Traverse A-A’ (InLine 6820)
A Van Ghent A’
Chalk Group
Holland Formation
Top Vlieland Shale
Base Volpriehausen
Flat event
TWT msec.
Vlieland Formation Top Hewett / Fringe
Base Vlieland Shale
Volpriehausen Fm.
Top Rotliegendes
Rotliegendes
Top Carboniferous
Figure 4
Carboniferous
500 m
Geo-Seismic Traverse B-B’ (Cross Line 755)
B Van Ghent B’
Chalk Group
Holland Formation Top Vlieland Shale
Base Vlieland Shale

Vlieland Formation Flat Event
TWT msec.
Base Volpriehausen
Lower Bunter Shale

Hewett / Fringe
Rotliegendes
Figure 5
Carboniferous
1000 m

14. APPENDIX A: CUTTINGS DESCRIPTION TABLE

Cuttings description P11-06 Van Ghent
DEPTH % LITHOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION

150 100 Sandstone: Loose grains, transparent-translucent, very fine to fine grained,
quartz, rounded to sub-rounded, traces of organic material, shell fragments,
calcareous.
180 100 A/A.
210 100 A/A.
240 100 A/A.
270 100 A/A.
300 70 Sandstone: Very fine, A/A.
30 Claystone: Pale grey to brownish grey, amorphous, soft, very silty, traces org
material, calcareous.
300 70 Sandstone: A/A.
30 Claystone: A/A.
330 70 Sandstone: A/A, silty.
30 Claystone: A/A, silty.
360 70 Sandstone: A/A.
30 Claystone: A/A.
390 100 Claystone: Pale greenish grey, soft-very soft, amorphous, pyrite, shells, slightly
calcareous. Very few cuttings on shakers, because of the mud dumping.
420 90 Claystone: Pale green grey to light grey, plastic, amorphous, shell fragments.
10 Sandstone: Transparent-translucent, fine to very fine grained, sub spherical, sub
rounded, unconsolidated.
450 100 Claystone: A/A.
Tr Sandstone: A/A.
480 100 Claystone: Pale green grey to light grey occasionally light orange grey, plastic,
amorphous to sub blocky.
510 100 Claystone: (2 types). 1: (50%) Light green grey, soft occasionally firm, sub
blocky to blocky occasionally amorphous.
2: (50%) Very light brown grey, soft occasionally plastic, sub blocky to
amorphous, silty.
540 100 Claystone: A/A. 1: (50%) 2: (50%).
550 100 Claystone: A/A. 1: (10%) 2: (90%).
560 100 Claystone: A/A. 1: (10%) 2: (90%).
570 100 Claystone: A/A. 1: (10%) 2: (90%). Foraminifera present.
580 100 Claystone: A/A. 1: (10%) 2: (90%).
590 100 Claystone: Light brown grey to light grey, soft to firm, sub blocky to blocky,
calcareous.
620 100 Claystone: Light orange brown to brown grey occasionally light grey
occasionally pale brown, plastic to soft occasionally firm, sub blocky to blocky
occasionally amorphous, calcareous in places.
640 100 Claystone: Brownish grey, occasionally bluish grey, blocky to sub blocky, soft to
medium, slightly calcareous.
645 100 A/A. Spot sample.
650 100 A/A.
660 100 A/A.
670 100 A/A.
680 100 A/A.
690 100 A/A.
695 80 Spot sample. Claystone: brown grey, soft to medium, blocky- sub blocky, non
20 calcareous.
Tuffite light grey, speckled, soft to medium.
700 90 A/A.
10 A/A.
705 100 Spot sample. Claystone: 70% grey to dark grey, 30% light brown grey, soft to
firm, blocky- sub blocky, non calcareous.
710 100 A/A.
715 100 Spot sample. A/A.
720 100 Claystone: 90% grey to dark grey, 10% light orange brown, soft to firm, blocky
to sub blocky, non calcareous.
730 100 A/A.
740 100 A/A.
750 100 A/A.
760 100 A/A.
770 100 A/A.
773 60 Spot sample. Claystone: Varicoloured, predominantly light grey, occasionally
brown, soft to firm, blocky to sub blocky, soft to firm, traces of sandstone, non
calcareous.
40 Chalk: Off white to cream, soft to medium, traces of chert.
70 Chalk: Off white to cream, firm to hard, crystalline.
70 Chalk: A/A.
90 Chalk: A/A.
Descriptions above by International Logging.
800 100 Chalk: off white to cream, firm, sub blocky, bioclastic packstone-grainstone
Tr Cement
810 100 Chalk: a/a
820 60 Chalk: a/a
40 Chert: pale grey, very light brown, very hard, angular break
830 50 Chalk: a/a, trace pyrite
50 Chert: a/a
840 50 Chalk: a/a
50 Chert: a/a
850 60 Chalk: a/a, foraminifera, echinoderm fragments
40 Chert: a/a
860 50 Chalk: a/a
50 Chert: a/a
870 50 Chalk: a/a
50 Chert: a/a
880 60 Chalk: a/a
40 Chert: a/a
890 70 Chalk: off white to cream, soft to firm, sub blocky, becoming mudstone-
wackestone.
30 Chert: a/a
900 Missed
910 80 Chalk: a/a
20 Chert: a/a
920 60 Chalk: a/a
40 Chert: a/a
930 60 Chalk: a/a, bioclastic grainstone, abundant foraminifera, coral fragments
40 Chert: a/a
940 70 Chalk: a/a, wackestone - grainstone.
30 Chert: a/a
950 60 Chalk: a/a, wackestone
40 Chert: pale grey, bluish grey, very light brown, very hard, angular break
960 80 Chalk: a/a, becoming mudstone - wackestone
20 Chert: a/a
970 80 Chalk: a/a, slightly glauconitic.
20 Chert: a/a
980 80 Chalk: a/a
20 Chert: a/a
990 80 Chalk: a/a
20 Chert: a/a
1000 70 Chalk: a/a
30 Chert: a/a
1010 60 Chalk: a/a, grainstone, coral and echinoderm fragments
40 Chert: a/a
1020 80 Chalk: cream to off white, soft, occasionally firm, amorphous – sub blocky,
mudstone – wackestone, fossiliferous
20 Chert: light grey, very light brown, very hard, angular – conchoidal break
1030 80 Chalk: a/a
20 Chert: a/a
1040 80 Chalk: a/a
20 Chert: a/a
1050 80 Chalk: a/a
20 Chert: a/a
1060 80 Chalk: a/a, coral and echinoderm fragments
20 Chert: a/a
1070 90 Chalk: a/a, slightly glauconitic
10 Chert: a/a
1080 100 Chalk: a/a
tr Chert: a/a
1090 100 Chalk: a/a, predominantly wackestone, glauconitic
tr Chert: a/a
1100 100 Chalk: a/a, becoming wackestone, occ packstone, glauconitic
tr Chert: a/a
1110 100 Chalk: a/a, glauconitic
tr Chert: a/a
1120 100 Chalk: a/a, slightly glauconitic, rare pyrite nodules
tr Chert: a/a
tr Chert: a/a
tr Chert: a/a
1150 100 Chalk: a/a
1160 100 Chalk: a/a, occ brown grey, slightly argillaceous, slightly glauconitic, trace pyrite
1170 100 Chalk: a/a, occ brown grey, slightly argillaceous, slightly glauconitic
1180 100 Chalk: off white to cream, occasionally light grey, soft to firm, mudstone to
wackestone, slightly glauconitic
1190 100 Chalk: a/a
1200 100 Chalk: a/a, slightly marly, trace pyrite
1210 100 Chalk: a/a, slightly marly
1220 100 Chalk: a/a, slightly marly, trace euhedral calcite.
1230 100 Chalk: a/a , trace pyrite
1240 100 Chalk: off white, light grey, firm to moderate hard, sub blocky, wackestone –
packstone, argillaceous, slightly glauconitic
1250 100 Chalk: a/a
1260 100 Chalk: a/a, becoming light to medium grey, marly
1270 100 Chalk: a/a
1285 100 Chalk: a/a
1290 100 Chalk: a/a
1305 100 Chalk: a/a, predominantly cream, mudstone to wackestone
1310 100 Chalk: a/a, trace pyrite
1315 100 Chalk: a/a
1320 100 Chalk: a/a, cream, light grey, light green, marly, very glauconitic
1325 100 Limestone: off white to cream, very glauconitic, crystalline, chalky
1330 40 Chalk: a/a
40 Marl: pale grey green, occ. bright dark green, soft to firm, amorphous to sub
blocky, sandy, very glauconitic
20 Sandstone: light green, very light brown, loose to hard, fine to medium,
glauconitic, calcareous cemented, with abundant loose glauconite and quartz
grains, fine to coarse, rounded to well rounded, elongated to sub spherical
1335 20 Chalk: a/a
50 Marl: a/a
30 Sandstone: a/a
1340 10 Chalk: a/a
60 Marl: a/a
30 Sandstone: a/a
1345 10 Chalk: a/a
80 Marl: a/a
10 Sandstone: a/a
1350 tr Chalk: a/a
90 Marl: a/a, trace pyrite
10 Sandstone: a/a
1355 40 Chalk: a/a
Trip @ 1353m 10 Marl: a/a
50 Sandstone: a/a
1360 90 Marl: medium grey, firm, sub blocky, silty, sandy, glauconitic, grading to
calcareous claystone
10 Sandstone: a/a
1365 100 Marl: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a, abundant loose glauconite and quartz grains, fine to coarse
1370 100 Marl: a/a, very silty
tr
1375 100 Marl: light to medium grey, firm, sub blocky, silty, very fine sandy, slightly
tr glauconitic
1380 100 Marl: a/a, micropyritic i.p.
1385 100 Marl: a/a, traces loose glauconite and quartz, fine – medium, rounded
1390 100 Marl: a/a, glauconitic
1395 100 Marl: a/a,
1400 20 Marl: a/a
30 Limestone: off white, green, yellow, firm, blocky, crystalline, glauconitic
50 Claystone: medium brown grey, occ ochre, soft to firm, sub blocky, silty, slightly
to non calcareous, glauconitic
1405 100 Claystone: a/a
1410 100 Claystone: a/a, traces loose fine quartz
tr Limestone: cream to yellow cream, occasionally grey, soft to hard, crystalline
1415 100 Claystone: a/a, good trace loose quartz and euhedral calcite
tr Limestone: a/a
1420 100 Claystone: a/a, becoming very silty, very fine sandy
tr Limestone: a/a
tr Limestone: a/a
tr Limestone: a/a
1435 100 Claystone: a/a, trace pyrite
tr Limestone: a/a
1440 100 Claystone: a/a, glauconitic
tr Limestone: a/a
tr Limestone: a/a
tr Sandstone: off white, grey, green grey, friable, very fine to fine, well sorted, sub
angular to sub rounded, calcareous cemented, glauconitic
tr Limestone: a/a
10 Sandstone: a/a
10 Sandstone: a/a
tr Limestone: a/a., occasionally glauconite
tr Sandstone: a/a
1465 100 Claystone: a/a.
tr Limestone: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
1470 100 Claystone: medium brown grey to dark grey, soft, amorphous, occasionally sub
blocky, silty, very fine sandy, non to very slightly calcareous, becoming
calcareous, glauconitic
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
10 Sandstone: a/a
70 Marl: light-medium greenish grey, soft to firm, amorphous to sub blocky, silty,
sandy, glauconitic
1490 100 Marl: a/a, becoming occasionally grey brown
1495 100 Marl: a/a, pyritic, very glauconitic
tr Limestone: off white – yellow, firm, mudstone, crystalline
1500 100 Marl: a/a
tr Limestone: a/a
1505 70 Marl: a/a
30 Claystone: light to medium brown grey, medium to dark grey, soft to firm,
amorphous to sub blocky, calcareous, glauconitic
tr Limestone: a/a
1510 60 Marl: a/a
30 Claystone: a/a
10 Limestone: a/a
1515 90 Marl: a/a, very glauconitic
10 Claystone: a/a
tr Limestone: a/a
1520 90 Marl: a/a
10 Claystone: a/a, decreasing glauconite
tr Limestone: a/a
1525 70 Marl: a/a
30 Claystone: a/a, light – medium brown grey
tr Limestone: a/a
1530 70 Marl: a/a
30 Claystone: a/a
tr Limestone: a/a
1535 20 Marl: a/a
80 Claystone: a/a
tr Limestone: a/a
1540 10 Marl: a/a
90 Claystone: light to medium brown grey, dark grey, soft to firm, amorphous to sub
blocky, silty, very fine sandy, calcareous, abundant loose quartz grains
tr Dolomite: brown, hard, crystalline, angular break, occ mudstone, argillaceous
tr Dolomite: a/a
tr Sandstone: as loose quartz, very fine, sorted, sub rounded, sub spherical
10 Sandstone: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
10 Dolomite: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Dolomite: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Dolomite: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Dolomite: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Dolomite: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Dolomite: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Dolomite: a/a
1610 100 Claystone: light to medium grey, soft to firm, sub blocky, silty, sandy,
calcareous, occasionally glauconitic
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Dolomite: buff to brown, firm to hard, blocky, mudstone – crystalline,
argillaceous
10 Dolomite: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Dolomite: a/a
1640 100 Claystone: a/a, predominantly medium grey
1645 100 Claystone: a/a, becoming grey to yellow brown
tr Dolomite: a/a
1650 100 Claystone: a/a, slightly glauconitic
tr Dolomite: a/a
10 Dolomite: a/a
10 Dolomite: a/a
1673 100 Claystone: a/a, becoming medium grey, occ dark grey
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Dolomite: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Dolomite: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Dolomite: a/a
1682 100 Claystone: a/a, pyritic
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Dolomite: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Sandstone: a/a
tr Dolomite: a/a
1700 100 Claystone: a/a, light to medium brown grey, very calcareous
tr Sandstone: a/a, traces loose quartz, medium to coarse, rounded
50 Sandstone: off white, light green grey, friable, very fine to medium, occasionally
coarse, moderately sorted, sub angular to sub rounded, calcareous, rare
argillaceous matrix, no show.
1706 Tr Sandstone: off white to cream, very light greenish grey, friable, fine, occ
medium, moderately sorted, sub angular to sub rounded, calcareous cemented.
90 Cement (samples strongly contaminated to 1775m)
10 Claystone: a.a
1709 20 Sandstone: a/a
Tr Claystone: light greenish grey, firm, sub blocky, slightly silty, dolomitic.
70 Cement
10 Claystone: a.a
1712 50 Sandstone: off white to cream, very light greenish grey, friable, fine, occ
medium, moderately sorted, sub angular to sub rounded, calcareous cemented,
10% pale orange brown direct fluor, no cut fluor, no residual ring.
10 Claystone: light greenish grey, a/a
40 Cement
tr Claystone: medium to dark grey, a.a
1715 Missed
1718 30 Sandstone: a/a, trace pale orange brown direct fluor, no cut fluor, no residual
10 ring.
60 Claystone: light greenish grey, a/a
tr Cement
Claystone: medium to dark grey, a/a
1721 Missed
1724 40 Sandstone: a/a, no show
20 Claystone: a/a
40 Cement
1727 Missed
20 Claystone: a/a, becoming occasionally red brown.
40 Cement
20 Claystone: a/a
30 Cement
1736 Missed
1739 60 Sandstone: a/a, becoming loose to friable, fine to coarse, poorly to moderately
sorted.
Tr Claystone: a/a
40 Cement
1742 70 Sandstone: a/a, occasionally pale brown.
10 Claystone: a/a
20 Cement
1745 80 Sandstone: a/a, 20-30% very dull yellow brown direct fluor
10 Claystone: a/a
10 Cement
1748 Missed
Tr Claystone: a/a
40 Cement
1754 60 Sandstone: a/a, also off white to very light brown, loose to moderately hard, very
fine to medium, no show
10 Claystone: a/a
30 Cement
1757 40 Sandstone: a/a, tr-5% even pale yellow fluor, clear cut, no residual ring
10 Claystone: a/a
50 Cement
1760 Missed
1763 60 Sandstone: a/a, f-crs, predominantly loose, tr-5% even pale yellow fluor, clear
cut, no residual ring
10 Claystone: a/a
30 Cement
1766 60 Sandstone: a/a, vf-med, occ grading to siltstone, tr-5% even pale yellow fluor,
clear cut, no residual ring
10 Claystone: a/a
30 Cement
1769 20 Sandstone: a/a, f-crs, no show
10 Claystone: a/a
70 Cement
1772 50 Sandstone: a/a, f-med, occ slt-vf
10 Claystone: a/a
40 Cement
1775 80 Sandstone: pale red brown, loose to moderately hard, fine to medium, occ coarse,
poorly to moderately sorted, sub rounded sub angular, dolomite/quartz cement
i.p., no show
Tr Claystone: very light grey green, firm, sub blocky, silty, sandy, sl dolomitic
20 Cement
1778 100 Sandstone: loose quartz, fine to medium, well sorted (changed to finer shaker
screens)
Tr Claystone: a/a
Tr Cement
Tr Claystone: a/a
Tr Claystone: a/a
Tr Claystone: a/a
Tr Claystone: a/a
1793 100 Sandstone: a/a, occasionally coarse
Gd tr Claystone: a/a
1796 100 Sandstone: a/a, fine to coarse
1808 90 Sandstone: a/a, very fine to fine
10 Claystone: a/a, becoming also red brown
Tr Claystone: a/a
Tr Claystone: soft, amorphous, pred red brown, occasionally green grey, silty, very
fine sandy, grading to argillaceous sandstone
80 Claystone: a/a
1820 20 Sandstone: a/a, grading to siltstone: hard, dolomite/quartz cemented
80 Claystone: a/a
90 Claystone: a/a
80 Claystone: a/a
1829 40 Sandstone: light green grey, hard, sub blocky, silt-very fine, dol/quartz cemented,
tight, no show
60 Claystone: a/a
80 Claystone: a/a, increase in grey green colours
60 Claystone: a/a
60 Claystone: a/a
1841 20 Sandstone: a/a, increase in red brown colours
80 Claystone: a/a
10 Claystone: a/a
20 Claystone: a/a, increase in grey green colours
10 Claystone: a/a
20 Claystone: a/a
20 Claystone: a/a
10 Claystone: a/a
1862 Missed
10 Claystone: a/a
1868 Missed
1871 20 Sandstone: predominantly as loose quartz, colorless, orange stained, fine to
80 coarse, sub angular to rounded
Claystone: a/a
90 Claystone: a/a
90 Claystone: a/a
50 Claystone: a/a, predominantly green grey
50 Claystone: a/a
60 Claystone: a/a
40 Claystone: a/a
TD 60 Claystone: a/a

15. APPENDIX B: SAMPLE MANIFESTS

SAMPLE MANIFEST: SET A
MUD SAMPLE INVENTORY

FROM: ILI crew, Labrador 1
TO: Petro-Canada storage facility, Panterra Geoconsultants B.V.,
Weversbaan 1-3, 2352 BZ Leiderdorp
Date: 13/04/2008
Operator: Petro-Canada
Well: P11-06 Van Ghent
Rig: Labrador 1
Samples: Washed & Dried- Set A
Box # From (m) To (m) Interval (m) # samples Missed
1 150 796 10 36 -
2 800 1160 10 36 900
3 1170 1410 10, 5 39 1255, 1265, 1275
4 1415 1670 5 52 -
5 1673 1805 3 39 1715, 1721, 1727,
1736, 1748, 1760
6 1808 1892 3 29 -
Total Samples 231 10

TO: Petro-Canada storage facility, Panterra Geoconsultants B.V.,
Weversbaan 1-3, 2352 BZ Leiderdorp
Date: 13/04/2008
Rig: Labrador 1
Samples: Wet - Set A
1 150 760 30, 10 32
2 760 1080 10 32 900
3 1090 1340 10, 5 32 1255, 1265, 1215
4 1345 1500 5 33 -
5 1505 1688 5, 3 40 -
6 1791 1892 3 28 1715, 1721, 1727,
1736, 1748, 1760
SAMPLE MANIFEST: SET B

TO: TNO NITG, Leeweriklaan 14, Bedrijvenpark Zeist west
3704 GR Zeist
Date: 13/04/2008
Rig: Labrador 1
Samples: Washed & Dried- Set B
1 150 796 10 36 -
2 800 1160 10 36 900
3 1170 1410 10, 5 39 1255, 1265, 1275
4 1415 1670 5 52 -
5 1673 1805 3 39 1715, 1721, 1727,
1736, 1748, 1760
6 1808 1892 3 29 -

TO: TNO NITG, Leeweriklaan 14, Bedrijvenpark Zeist west
3704 GR Zeist
Date: 13/04/2008
Rig: Labrador 1
Samples: Wet - Set B
1 150 760 30, 10 32
2 760 1080 10 32 900
3 1090 1340 10, 5 32 1255, 1265, 1215
4 1345 1500 5 33 -
5 1505 1688 5, 3 40 -
6 1791 1892 3 28 1715, 1721, 1727,
1736, 1748, 1760

16. APPENDIX C: DRILL GAS PIXLER PLOTS (INTERNATIONAL LOGGING)
P11-06 Depth=1678.0 MDRT
1000.000
100.000
10.000
1.000
C1/C2 C1/C3 C1/C4 C1/C5
1000.000
Non Productive
100.000
Gas
10.000
Oil
Non Productive
1.000
C1/C2 C1/C3 C1/C4 C1/C5

1000.000
Non Productive
100.000
Gas
10.000
Oil
Non Productive
1.000
C1/C2 C1/C3 C1/C4 C1/C5
1000.000
Non Productive
100.000
Gas
10.000
Oil
Non Productive
1.000
C1/C2 C1/C3 C1/C4 C1/C5

17. APPENDIX D: DIRECTIONAL SURVEY LISTING (BAKER HUGHES INTEQ)

Actual Wellpath Report
P11-06_AWP
Page n of nn
REFERENCE WELLPATH IDENTIFICATION

Operator PETROCANADA NETHERLANDS B.V. Slot Slot 1
Area DUTCH NORTH SEA Well P11-06
Field P-11 Wellbore P11-06_AWB
Facility P11-06 Van Ghent
REPORT SETUP INFORMATION

Projection System ED50 / UTM Zone 31 North Software System WellArchitect® 2.0
North Reference Grid User Florvanc
Scale 0.999609 Report Generated 29/Apr/2008 at 09:13
Convergence at slot 0.32° East Database/Source file WA_NETHERLANDS/P11-06_AWB.xml
WELLPATH LOCATION
Local coordinates Grid coordinates Geographic coordinates
North[m] East[m] Easting[m] Northing[m] Latitude Longitude
Slot Location 0.00 0.00 527761.71 5801617.91 52°21'46.964"N 3°24'27.645"E
Facility Reference Pt 527761.71 5801617.91 52°21'46.964"N 3°24'27.645"E
Field Reference Pt 522700.00 5802500.00 52°22'16.350"N 3°20'00.274"E
WELLPATH DATUM
Calculation method Minimum curvature Rig on Slot 1 (RT) to Facility Vertical Datum 0.00m
Horizontal Reference Pt Facility Center Rig on Slot 1 (RT) to Mean Sea Level 40.00m
Vertical Reference Pt Rig on Slot 1 (RT) Facility Vertical Datum to Mud Line (Facility) 74.40m
MD Reference Pt Rig on Slot 1 (RT) Section Origin N 0.00, E 0.00 m
Field Vertical Reference Mean Sea Level Section Azimuth 0.00°
P11-06_AWP
Page n of nn

WELLPATH DATA (63 stations)

MD Inclination Azimuth TVD TVD from Vert Sect North East DLS
[m] [°] [°] [m] Fld Vert Ref [m] [m] [m] [°/30m]
[m]
0.00 0.000 338.690 0.00 -40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
227.00 2.130 338.690 226.95 186.95 3.93 3.93 -1.53 0.28
236.00 1.510 335.250 235.94 195.94 4.19 4.19 -1.64 2.10
264.00 1.870 341.420 263.93 223.93 4.96 4.96 -1.94 0.43
293.00 1.370 357.820 292.92 252.92 5.76 5.76 -2.11 0.70
321.00 1.560 348.450 320.91 280.91 6.46 6.46 -2.20 0.33
350.00 1.400 347.860 349.90 309.90 7.20 7.20 -2.35 0.17
378.00 1.360 347.480 377.89 337.89 7.86 7.86 -2.49 0.04
407.00 1.480 347.090 406.88 366.88 8.56 8.56 -2.65 0.12
438.00 1.570 348.480 437.87 397.87 9.36 9.36 -2.83 0.09
464.00 1.500 348.760 463.86 423.86 10.05 10.05 -2.96 0.08
493.00 1.620 354.340 492.85 452.85 10.83 10.83 -3.08 0.20
521.00 1.450 353.090 520.84 480.84 11.57 11.57 -3.16 0.19
550.00 1.470 348.580 549.83 509.83 12.30 12.30 -3.28 0.12
578.00 1.250 350.420 577.83 537.83 12.95 12.95 -3.40 0.24
606.00 1.320 353.290 605.82 565.82 13.58 13.58 -3.49 0.10
635.00 1.280 350.030 634.81 594.81 14.23 14.23 -3.58 0.09
663.00 1.190 346.010 662.80 622.80 14.82 14.82 -3.71 0.13
692.00 1.210 352.680 691.80 651.80 15.41 15.41 -3.82 0.15
720.00 1.110 340.530 719.79 679.79 15.96 15.96 -3.95 0.28
749.00 1.040 351.620 748.79 708.79 16.49 16.49 -4.08 0.23
777.00 0.910 338.120 776.78 736.78 16.94 16.94 -4.20 0.28
779.00 0.920 336.740 778.78 738.78 16.97 16.97 -4.21 0.36
824.00 0.650 331.300 823.78 783.78 17.53 17.53 -4.48 0.19
852.00 0.280 315.250 851.78 811.78 17.72 17.72 -4.60 0.42
881.00 0.480 179.540 880.78 840.78 17.65 17.65 -4.65 0.73
909.00 0.700 167.660 908.78 868.78 17.36 17.36 -4.61 0.27
937.00 0.630 189.160 936.77 896.77 17.04 17.04 -4.60 0.28
965.00 0.610 187.260 964.77 924.77 16.74 16.74 -4.64 0.03
994.00 0.510 192.250 993.77 953.77 16.46 16.46 -4.69 0.12
1022.00 0.550 191.470 1021.77 981.77 16.21 16.21 -4.74 0.04
1050.00 0.650 196.760 1049.77 1009.77 15.93 15.93 -4.82 0.12
1079.00 0.540 199.600 1078.77 1038.77 15.64 15.64 -4.91 0.12
1107.00 0.630 197.510 1106.77 1066.77 15.37 15.37 -5.00 0.10
1135.00 1.230 167.210 1134.76 1094.76 14.93 14.93 -4.98 0.81
1164.00 1.580 164.540 1163.75 1123.75 14.24 14.24 -4.81 0.37
1193.00 1.510 161.910 1192.74 1152.74 13.49 13.49 -4.58 0.10
1220.00 1.500 162.250 1219.73 1179.73 12.82 12.82 -4.36 0.01
1250.00 1.500 165.110 1249.72 1209.72 12.06 12.06 -4.14 0.07
1279.00 1.480 165.890 1278.71 1238.71 11.33 11.33 -3.95 0.03
1307.00 1.500 165.510 1306.70 1266.70 10.63 10.63 -3.77 0.02
1335.00 1.500 166.480 1334.69 1294.69 9.92 9.92 -3.60 0.03
1364.00 1.510 167.770 1363.68 1323.68 9.18 9.18 -3.43 0.04
1392.00 1.380 168.000 1391.67 1351.67 8.48 8.48 -3.28 0.14
1420.00 1.290 170.880 1419.67 1379.67 7.84 7.84 -3.16 0.12
1449.00 1.210 171.760 1448.66 1408.66 7.22 7.22 -3.06 0.09
1477.00 1.170 171.270 1476.65 1436.65 6.64 6.64 -2.98 0.04
1506.00 1.340 174.320 1505.65 1465.65 6.01 6.01 -2.90 0.19
1534.00 1.020 166.800 1533.64 1493.64 5.44 5.44 -2.81 0.38
1562.00 1.020 178.460 1561.64 1521.64 4.95 4.95 -2.74 0.22
P11-06_AWP
Page n of nn

WELLPATH DATA (63 stations)

MD Inclination Azimuth TVD TVD from Vert Sect North East DLS
[m] [°] [°] [m] Fld Vert Ref [m] [m] [m] [°/30m]
[m]
1591.00 0.910 175.680 1590.63 1550.63 4.47 4.47 -2.72 0.12
1619.00 0.910 176.610 1618.63 1578.63 4.02 4.02 -2.69 0.02
1648.00 0.930 176.080 1647.63 1607.63 3.56 3.56 -2.66 0.02
1677.00 0.960 182.150 1676.62 1636.62 3.08 3.08 -2.65 0.11
1697.00 0.950 187.950 1696.62 1656.62 2.75 2.75 -2.68 0.15
1704.00 0.950 188.968 1703.62 1663.62 2.63 2.63 -2.70 0.07
1713.00 0.880 183.080 1712.62 1672.62 2.49 2.49 -2.72 0.39
1772.00 1.240 183.790 1771.61 1731.61 1.40 1.40 -2.78 0.18
1800.00 1.130 189.640 1799.60 1759.60 0.83 0.83 -2.85 0.18
1829.00 0.670 227.990 1828.60 1788.60 0.43 0.43 -3.02 0.76
1857.00 0.740 254.160 1856.60 1816.60 0.27 0.27 -3.32 0.35
1885.00 0.890 267.440 1884.59 1844.59 0.21 0.21 -3.71 0.26
1892.00 0.890 267.440 1891.59 1851.59 0.21 0.21 -3.82 0.00
HOLE & CASING SECTIONS Ref Wellbore: P11-06_AWB Ref Wellpath: P11-06_AWP
String/Diameter Start MD End MD Interval Start TVD End TVD Start N/S Start E/W End N/S End E/W
[m] [m] [m] [m] [m] [m] [m] [m] [m]
30in Conductor 0.00 146.25 146.25 0.00 146.24 0.00 0.00 1.63 -0.64
13.375in Casing 0.00 794.00 794.00 0.00 793.78 0.00 0.00 17.18 -4.30
9.625in Casing 0.00 1703.00 1703.00 0.00 1702.62 0.00 0.00 2.65 -2.70
7in Liner 0.00 1888.00 1888.00 0.00 1887.59 0.00 0.00 0.21 -3.76
TARGETS
Name MD TVD North East Grid East Grid North Latitude Longitude Shape
[m] [m] [m] [m] [m] [m]
1690.00 0.00 0.00 527761.71 5801617.91 52°21'46.964"N 3°24'27.645"E circle
Top Fringe Zechstein
WELLPATH COMPOSITION Ref Wellbore: P11-06_AWB Ref Wellpath: P11-06_AWP

Start MD End MD Positional Uncertainty Model Log Name/Comment Wellbore
[m] [m]
0.00 779.00 EMS (Standard) EMS Top Hole Section <0m - 779m> P11-06_AWB
779.00 1704.00 OnTrak (Standard) Ontrak 12 1/4" <824m -1704m> P11-06_AWB
1704.00 1892.00 OnTrak (Standard) Ontrak 8 1/2" <1677m - 1885m> P11-06_AWB
PETROCANADA NETHERLANDS B.V.
Location: DUTCH NORTH SEA Slot: Slot 1
Field: P-11 Well: P11-06
Facility: P11-06 Van Ghent Wellbore: P11-06_AWB
Plot reference wellpath is P11-06_AWP

True vertical depths are referenced to Rig on Slot 1 (RT) Grid System: ED50 / UTM Zone 31 North
Bottom Hole Location
Measured depths are referenced to Rig on Slot 1 (RT) North Reference: Grid north MD (m) Inc (°) Az (°) TVD (m) Local N (m) Local E (m) Grid East (m) Grid North (m) Latitude Longitude
Rig on Slot 1 (RT) to Mean Sea Level: 40 meters Scale: Grid distance 1892.00 0.890 267.440 1891.59 0.21 -3.82 527757.89 5801618.12 52°21'46.971"N 3°24'27.443"E
Mean Sea Level to Mud line (Facility: P11-06 Van Ghent): 34.4 meters Depths are in meters
Coordinates are in meters referenced to Facility Center Created by: florvanc on 14/Apr/2008
Well Data
Slot Well Wellbore Wellpath
Location Information Slot 1 P11-06 P11-06 PWB P11-06 PWP rev A.01
Facility Name Grid East (m) Grid North (m) Latitude Longitude
Slot 1 P11-06 P11-06_AWB P11-06_AWP
P11-06 Van Ghent 527761.710 5801617.910 52°21'46.964"N 3°24'27.645"E
Slot Local N (m) Local E (m) Grid East (m) Grid North (m) Latitude Longitude
Slot 1 0.00 0.00 527761.710 5801617.910 52°21'46.964"N 3°24'27.645"E
Rig on Slot 1 (RT) to Mud line (Facility: P11-06 Van Ghent) 74.4m Approval
Mean Sea Level to Mud line (Facility: P11-06 Van Ghent) 34.4m INTEQ Representatives
Rig on Slot 1 (RT) to Mean Sea Level 40m Prepared by Reviewed by
Signature Signature
Position Position
Date Date
Wellpath Composition PETROCANADA NETHERLANDS B.V. Representative
Start MD (m) End MD (m) Tool Model Log Name/Comment Wellbore
Approved by Position
0.00 779.00 Gyrodata standard - Continuous gyro Gyrodata standard - Continuous gyro Gyro Top Hole Section <0m - 779m> P11-06_AWB
Signature Date
779.00 1704.00 OnTrak OnTrak (Standard) Ontrak 12 1/4" <824m -1704m> P11-06_AWB
Comment
1704.00 1892.00 OnTrak OnTrak (Standard) Ontrak 8 1/2" <1677m - 1885m> P11-06_AWB
Targets Wellpath Comments

Name MD (m) TVD (m) Local N (m) Local E (m) Grid East (m) Grid North (m) Latitude Longitude MD (m) X (m) Y (m) TVD (m) Inclination (°) Azimuth (°) VS (m) Comment
Top Fringe Zechstein 1690.00 0.00 0.00 527761.71 5801617.91 52°21'46.964"N 3°24'27.645"E
690.00 -3.81 15.37 689.80 1.208 352.228 15.37 Top Landen
769.60 -4.16 16.83 769.38 0.939 342.038 16.83 Top Ommelanden Chalk
1327.50 -3.64 10.11 1327.20 1.500 166.220 10.11 Top Texel
1353.60 -3.48 9.44 1353.29 1.506 167.309 9.44 Top Holland
Hole and Casing Sections 1539.30 -2.79 5.35 1538.94 1.017 168.999 5.35 Top Vlieland Claystone
Start End Start End Start Start End End
Name MD (m) MD (m) Interval (m) TVD (m) TVD (m) Local N (m) Local E (m) Local N (m) Local E (m) Wellbore 1702.20 -2.70 2.66 1701.82 0.950 188.706 2.66 Top Volpriehausen
30in Conductor 0.00 146.25 146.25 0.00 146.24 0.00 0.00 1.63 -0.64 P11-06_AWB 1800.80 -2.85 0.81 1800.40 1.113 190.230 0.81 Top Lower Buntsandstein
13.375in Casing 0.00 794.00 794.00 0.00 793.78 0.00 0.00 17.18 -4.30 P11-06_AWB 1870.70 -3.50 0.23 1870.29 0.808 261.272 0.23 Top Hewett
9.625in Casing 0.00 1703.00 1703.00 0.00 1702.62 0.00 0.00 2.65 -2.70 P11-06_AWB
Scale 1 inch = 3.68201 m

Easting (m)
Scale 1 inch = 450 m
13.375in Casing
30in Conductor
Top Landen
Northing (m)
True Vertical Depth (m)
13.375in Casing Top Ommelanden Chalk
Top Texel
Top Holland
Top Vlieland Claystone
9.625in Casing
Top Fringe Zechstein Top Volpriehausen
30in Conductor
9.625in Casing
Top Lower Buntsandstein
Top Hewett
Top Fringe Zechstein
Vertical Section (m) Scale 1 inch = 450 m

BGGM (1945.0 to 2009.0) Dip: 67.29° Field: 48882.9 nT
Magnetic North is 0.84 degrees West of True North (at 28/Mar/2008)
Azimuth 0.00° with reference 0.00 N, 0.00 E Grid North is 0.32 degrees East of True North
To correct azimuth from True to Grid subtract 0.32 degrees
To correct azimuth from Magnetic to Grid subtract 1.16 degrees
For example: if the Magnetic North Azimuth = 90 degs, then the Grid North Azimuth = 90 - 1.16 = 88.84

18. APPENDIX E: LWD REPORT (BAKER HUGHES INTEQ)

Petro Canada Nederland B.V
End of Well Report
Date : 14 April 2008.

Well name/number : P11-06 Van Ghent.
Rig : GSF Labrador.
Field : P11
SAP job number : 60914823.
Signature Date
Created By: Flores, Vanessa
Well Planner
Signature Date
Reviewed By: Van Waes, Marc
Ops Coordinator
Signature Date
Approved By: TOTAL E&P Nederland
Customer B.V.
Petro Canada Nederland B.V
End of Well Report
Date : 14 April 2008
Well name/number : P11-06 Van Ghent
Rig : GSF Labrador
Field : P11
SAP job number : 60914823
INTEQ, September 2008 © 2008 Baker Hughes Incorporated

All rights reserved
INDEX
Section 1 : Section Highlights and Recommendations
Section 2 : MWD/RWD Logging Summary
Section 3 : MWD Summary and Sensor Offsets
Section 4 : Equipment Performance Summary
Section 5 : MWD Performance Summary
Section 6 : Personnel Deployment summary
Section 7 : Operational Problems Experienced
Section 8 : Post deployment Equipment Analysis
Section 9 : MWD/RWD Abbreviation Listing

All rights reserved
1. Section Highlights and Recommendations
12 ¼” Section
Highlights
• Good steering and performance while drilling this section.

• Good Rate of Penetration along this section until reaching the total depth.
• Excellent Near Bit Resistivity performance on finding the Top of Volpriehausen
reservoir.
Lessons Learned
• The trajectory followed the planned well path. However, a few meters before reaching
the total depth, the trend to go in a North direction was broken, and it was necessary
to slide 15 meters to the right.
Recommendations
• The Near Bit Resistivity should be used for future jobs due to its biggest advantage of
being able to know immediately and in real time the resistivity and other properties of
the earth formation and its major accuracy while drilling.
8 ½” Section
Highlights
• A Rotary Assembly and an OnTrak tool were used to drill this section.
• Good MWD decoding while drilling in open hole section.

All rights reserved
2. MWD / RWD Logging Summary
MWD / RWD LOGGING SUMMARY
Hole/ Casing Interval Max Temp

Run Suite Dates Comments
Size (m) (C)
1 12 ¼” OTK 05-April-08 – 07-April-08 796-1353 57.0 Tool performed to specification
OTK,
2 12¼” 08-April-08 – 09-April-08 1353-1704 61.0 Tool performed to specification
BIT RES
3 8 ½” OTK 11-April-08 – 12-April-08 1704-1892 56.6 Tool performed to specification

All rights reserved
3. MWD Run Summary and Sensor Offsets
Depths in metres SENSOR OFFSETS Temperature °C

Hole Run Tool Service Start End Circ Max Fail
Size No. No. Level Depth Depth DIR Gam Res Press Bit Hrs. Temp Type
Res
12 ¼” 1 10189691 OTK 796 1353 17.35 15.89 N/A N/A N/A 41.0 57.0 None
OTK / BIT
12 ¼” 2 10189691 1353 1704 7.43 5.97 N/A N/A 0.0 29.1 61.0 None
RES
8 ½” 3 10389424 OTK 1704 1892 5.90 2.90 4.13 N/A N/A 13.6 56.6 None

All rights reserved
4. Equipment Performance Summary
DOWNHOLE EQUIPMENT
Performed to
Tool Tool Data Serial Runs Total Circ
Specification
Size Type Rate Number Used Hours
(Yes/No)
9 ½” OTK II N/A 10189691 1,2 70.1 Yes
9 ½” BCPM 0.50, 0.24 10209470 1,2 70.1 Yes
9 ½” BIT RES N/A 10359517 2 29.1 Yes
6 ¾” OTK N/A 10389424 3 13.6 Yes
6 ¾” BCPM 0.24 10129604 3 13.6 Yes
SURFACE EQUIPMENT
Performed to Specification
Description Serial Number
(Yes/No)
Dell PC 390 --- Yes
Dell PC 390 --- Yes
Dell PC 390 --- Yes
SARA II 10377486 Yes
Veritas plotter --- Yes
Brother laserprinter --- Yes
Please refer to section on Post Deployment Equipment Analysis Report for tools that did not
perform to specification.

All rights reserved
5. MWD / RWD Performance Summary
12 1/4” Hole Section
MWD RUN # 1 12:00 05/04/08 to 20:15 07/04/08

Interval Drilled 796m – 1353m
Tool Type OnTrak II
Operational status - Tool performed to specification
Percentage Percentage
MWD / RWD Service Logged MWD / RWD Service Logged
MWD RWD MWD RWD
Directional / VSS 100 100
Gamma Ray 100 100
Picked up the OnTrakII LWD tool. The necessary tools to open the OnTrakII hatch were not delivered
to the rig. The SW12 socket had to be flown in later. Had to program and verify tool through the M30
ring on top of the BCPM. Programmed and verified (except the resistivity sensors) tool oke. The LWD
tool was run in hole after a successfull surface test. Decoding was very good at 0.5 data rate and a
good realtime log was aqcuired. After downloading the memory data, a excellent memory log was
made. verification of the resistivity sensors was done after pulling out of hole.
MWD RUN # 2 01:00 08/04/08 to 14:00 09/04/08

Tool Type OnTrak II
MWD RWD MWD RWD
Gamma Ray 100 100
Near Bit Res 100 100
Used the same OnTrakII LWD tool. The mud motor was laid down and the nearbit resistivity sub was
added to the bottom hole assembly. This LWD tool was run in hole after a successfull surface test.
Decoding was very good at 0.24 data rate and a good realtime log was aqcuired. The near bit
resistivity sensor confirmed the entry of the reservoir with a sharp increase of the resistivity value to
about 6 ohm/m. After pulling out of hole an excellent memory log was produced.

All rights reserved
8 1/2” Hole Section
MWD RUN # 3 16:00 11/04/08 to 16:30 12/04/08

Tool Type OnTrak
MWD RWD MWD RWD
Gamma Ray 100 100
Resistivity 100 100
A 6 ¾" OnTrak LWD tool was made up and run in hole after a successful surface test. Decoding was
initially poor whilst drilling out the cement and float using a data rate of 0.24. Once in open hole
decoding improved to 100% using a 0.24 data rate, and a good realtime log was produced. Good
responses were seen in all curves whilst drilling out the reservoir at 40-50 m/hr. After pulling out of
hole an excellent memory log was produced.

All rights reserved
6. Personnel Deployment Summary
Departure Return
Field Service Engineer
Time Date Time Date
R. de Lange 09:00 30-03-08 14:00 13-04-08
L. Duivenvoorde 09:00 30-03-08 14:00 02-04-08
P. van der Vegt 12:45 03-04-08 14:00 09-04-08
I. Hunter 12:45 05-04-08 18:00 14-04-08
P. Brouwer 13:00 09-04-08 18:00 14-04-08

All rights reserved
7. Operational Problems Experienced
DOWNHOLE ASSEMBLIES
Run Hole Tool Type Serial Operational Problem Experienced

No. Size Number
1, 2 12 ¼” OTK II 10189691 No problems experienced
1, 2 12 ¼” BCPM 10209470 No problems experienced
2 12 ¼” BIT RES 10359517 No problems experienced
3 8 ½” OTK 10389424 No problems experienced
3 8 ½” BCPM 10129604 No problems experienced
SURFACE EQUIPMENT
Report Equipment Description Serial Operational Problem Experienced

Number Number
1 Dell PC 390 --- No problems experienced
4 SARA II 10377486 No problems experienced
5 Veritas plotter --- No problems experienced
6 Brother laserprinter --- No problems experienced

All rights reserved
8. Post Deployment Equipment Analysis
Run Serial Operational Problem Primary Cause of Failure Action Status

Number
1, 2 10189691 None N/A N/A OK
1, 2 10209470 None N/A N/A OK
2 10359517 None N/A N/A OK
3 10389424 None N/A N/A OK
3 10129604 None N/A N/A OK

All rights reserved
9. MWD / RWD Abbreviation Listing
ATK G3 : AutoTrak Generation 3 Rotary Closed Loop system
DIR : Directional Only service
DG : Directional and Gamma service
VSS : Vibration and Stick Slip service
AP : Annular Pressure service
ADV : Advantage Surface Software
OTK : OnTrak (Gamma , Resistivity, Annular Pressure, Directional and VSS sensors)
MPR : Multiple Propagation Resistivity service
BCPM : Bidirectional Communication and Power Module (Pulser, power and Downlinking)
ASS : Adjustable Steerable Stabiliser (Steering Head)
MWD : Measured While Drilling (Realtime Data)
RWD : Recorded While Drilling (Memory Data)
SDN : Slim Hole Density and Neutron.
TTK : TesTrak (Formation Pressure Tester)
ORD : Optimized Rotational Density
CCN : Caliper Compensated Neutron Porosity
COP : CoPilot

All rights reserved

19. APPENDIX F: FORMATION PRESSURE SUMMARY (RUN 2B)

CONFIDENTIAL
9.6. MDT Summary
9.6.1. Formation Pressures table
Date: 13/04/2008 Client: Petro-Canada Netherlands BV Engineer: J.Espinosa / V.Mukhin
Rig: GSF Labrador Well: P11-06 v
2.4 Log QC: Ian Barwick / Henk van Gastel
Pressures (bara) Mobility Mobility

Depths (m) Times Hydrostatic Formation Hydrostatic Kdd FRA Temp DD
Test File MDBRT TVDBRT TVDSS Start Duration Finish Strain Quartz gm/cc Strain Quartz gm/cc Strain Quartz gm/cc Zone md mD/cP DegC cc Comments
x 1 61 1708.0 1707.6 1667.6 14:25 00:10 14:35 209.8 209.6 1.25 174.7 174.5 1.04 209.8 209.6 1.25 1 572.3 67.7 19.9 Good test
x 2 62 1713.0 1712.6 1672.6 14:38 00:09 14:47 210.4 210.2 1.25 174.8 174.6 1.04 210.4 210.2 1.25 1 437.2 67.5 19.3 Good test
x 3 63 1716.5 1716.1 1676.1 14:50 00:08 14:58 210.8 210.7 1.25 174.9 174.7 1.04 210.8 210.7 1.25 1 484.6 67.7 19.3 Good test
x 4 64 1719.5 1719.1 1679.1 15:01 00:07 15:08 211.2 211.0 1.25 174.9 174.7 1.04 211.2 211.0 1.25 1 132.1 67.9 19.4 Good test
x 5 65 1723.0 1722.6 1682.6 15:12 00:08 15:20 211.6 211.5 1.25 174.9 174.7 1.03 211.6 211.5 1.25 1 448.0 68.1 19.7 Good test
x 6 66 1728.0 1727.6 1687.6 15:23 00:10 15:33 212.2 212.1 1.25 175.0 174.8 1.03 212.2 212.1 1.25 1 106.0 68.4 19.1 Good test
x 7 67 1733.2 1732.8 1692.8 15:36 00:09 15:45 212.9 212.7 1.25 175.1 174.9 1.03 212.9 212.7 1.25 1 697.8 68.6 19.7 Good test
x 8 68 1742.5 1742.1 1702.1 15:49 00:09 15:58 214.0 213.8 1.25 175.2 175.0 1.02 214.0 213.8 1.25 1 35.1 68.9 19.6 Good test
x 9 69 1746.5 1746.1 1706.1 16:01 00:09 16:10 214.5 214.3 1.25 175.3 175.1 1.02 214.5 214.3 1.25 1 7.6 69.3 19.9 Good test
x 10 70 1751.0 1750.6 1710.6 16:13 00:12 16:25 215.0 214.9 1.25 175.3 175.2 1.02 215.0 215.9 1.26 1 14.2 69.6 19.3 Good test
x 11 72 1755.2 1754.8 1714.8 16:45 00:08 16:53 215.5 215.4 1.25 175.6 175.4 1.02 215.6 215.4 1.25 2 50.2 70.4 19.4 Good test
x 12 74 1758.3 1757.9 1717.9 17:28 00:08 17:36 215.9 215.8 1.25 175.7 175.6 1.02 215.9 215.8 1.25 2 14.4 70.8 19.9 Good test
x 13 75 1763.5 1763.1 1723.1 17:45 00:10 17:55 216.5 216.4 1.25 176.1 175.9 1.02 216.5 216.4 1.25 2 17.1 71.0 10.0 Good test
x 14 76 1767.0 1766.6 1726.6 17:59 00:20 18:19 217.0 216.8 1.25 216.8 1.25 3 10.0 Tight Test
x 15 77 1766.5 1766.1 1726.1 18:24 00:06 18:30 216.9 216.7 1.25 176.5 176.3 1.02 216.9 216.7 1.25 3 11.3 71.0 10.0 Good test
16 78 1777.5 1777.1 1737.1 18:39 00:13 18:52 218.2 218.1 1.25 177.7 177.5 1.02 218.2 218.1 1.25 3 3.2 71.2 10.2 Additional point. Misake made with depth
x 17 79 1775.5 1775.1 1735.1 18:54 00:08 19:02 218.0 217.8 1.25 177.4 177.2 1.02 218.0 217.8 1.25 3 15.3 71.3 10.0 Good test
x 18 80 1786.0 1785.6 1745.6 19:05 00:09 19:14 219.3 219.1 1.25 178.4 178.2 1.02 219.3 219.1 1.25 3 27.5 71.4 10.0 Good test
x 19 81 1797.5 1797.1 1757.1 19:19 00:09 19:28 220.6 220.5 1.25 179.4 179.2 1.02 220.6 220.5 1.25 3 425.6 71.7 10.1,9.9 Good test. Repeated drawdown
x 20 84 1871.0 1870.6 1830.6 19:44 00:07 19:51 229.5 229.4 1.25 229.4 1.25 4 Tight Test
x 21 85 1871.4 1871.0 1831.0 19:55 00:10 20:05 229.6 229.4 1.25 186.6 186.4 1.02 229.6 229.4 1.25 4 352.0 73.9 10.1,10.0Good test. Repeated drawdown
x 22 86 1879.0 1878.6 1838.6 20:09 00:08 20:17 230.5 230.4 1.25 187.4 187.2 1.02 230.4 230.5 1.25 4 192.5 74.3 10.1 Good Test
x 23 88 1884.0 1883.6 1843.6 20:21 00:07 20:28 231.1 231.0 1.25 188.0 187.8 1.02 231.2 231.0 1.25 4 9.6 74.7 10.1 Good test
x 24 89 1733.2 1732.8 1692.8 20:57 00:11 21:08 213.0 212.7 1.25 175.2 174.9 1.03 212.9 212.7 1.25 5 214.6 70.2 10,10 Good test. Repeat for QC purpose
x 25 90 1751.8 1751.4 1711.4 21:11 00:14 21:25 215.1 214.9 1.25 175.4 175.2 1.02 215.1 214.9 1.25 2 40.6 69.8 10.1, 10 Good test. Repeated drawdown
x 26 91 1753.0 1752.6 1712.6 21:28 00:08 21:36 215.3 215.1 1.25 175.4 175.2 1.02 215.1 215.3 1.25 2 22.2 70.2 10.1 Good test
x 27 92 1756.3 1755.9 1715.9 21:38 00:15 21:53 215.7 215.5 1.25 175.7 175.5 1.02 215.7 215.5 1.25 2 17.5 70.7 10.1,10 First drawdown did not stabilise.
x 28 93 1760.8 1760.4 1720.4 21:55 00:17 22:12 216.2 216.0 1.25 175.9 175.7 1.02 216.2 216.0 1.25 2 4.2 71.0 10.3,9.4 First drawdown did not stabilise
x 29 104 1751.8 1751.4 1711.4 05:45 00:10 05:55 215.2 1.25 175.4 1.02 2 22.0 70.9 10.0 Abandoned sample due to gas
x 30 107 1755.2 1754.8 1714.8 07:15 00:10 07:25 215.5 1.25 175.5 1.02 2 13.0 72.0 10.0 Sample abandoned due to lost seal
x 31 110 1754.7 1754.3 1714.3 08:15 00:10 08:25 215.5 1.25 175.5 1.02 2 6.0 72.0 10.0 Tight Test
x 32 11 1758.3 1757.9 1717.9 08:35 00:05 08:40 2 72.4 10.0 Tight Test
x 33 112 1756.0 1755.6 1715.6 08:45 00:05 08:50 215.6 1.25 175.7 1.02 2 10.0 72.0 10.0 No sample attempted, too tight
x 34 114 1755.5 1755.1 1715.1 09:00 00:10 09:10 215.5 1.25 175.6 1.02 2 17.7 72.0 10.0 Sample abandoned due to plugged tool
x 35 116 1755.2 1754.8 1714.8 13:20 00:10 13:30 175.4 1.02 215.5 1.25 2 2.5 72.7 10.0 2 x SPMC samples taken
x 39 123 1755.2 1754.8 1714.8 14:35 00:05 14:40 2 72.7 10.0 Tight Test
x 40 124 1754.7 1754.3 1714.3 14:55 00:30 15:25 215.3 1.25 175.5 1.02 2 4.7 72.6 10.0 Tight Test
x 42 132 1733.2 1732.8 1692.8 21:10 00:15 21:25 212.6 1.25 175.0 1.03 1 363.0 71.2 10.0 Sample abandoned due to pump
x 43 143 1733.2 1732.8 1692.8 12:30 00:10 12:40 212.6 1.25 175.1 1.03 1 416.7 71.0 10.0 6 x MPSR samples taken
x 44 147 1797.5 1797.1 1757.1 16:00 00:20 16:20 219.8 1.25 179.4 1.02 219.8 1.25 3 203.2 74.3 20.0 2 x MPSR sample taken
Van Ghent Prospect (P11-06) 8 1/2” TD LOGGING Page 58 of 66

CONFIDENTIAL
9.6.3. Formation Pressures
Formation Pressure Plot
1650.0
1670.0
1690.0
1710.0
Depth (m) tvdss
1730.0 Volpriehausen Gas

Volpriehausen Oil
1750.0
Volpriehausen Water
Hew itt
1770.0
QC Repeat
1790.0
1810.0
1830.0
1850.0
170 172 174 176 178 180 182 184 186 188 190
Pressure ((bara))
9.6.4. Hydrostatic Pressures
Hydrostatic Pressure Plot
1650.0
1670.0
1690.0
1710.0
Depth (m) tvdss
1730.0
Hydrostatic (before)
1750.0
Hydrostatic (after)
1770.0
1790.0
1810.0
1830.0
1850.0
205 210 215 220 225 230 235
Pressure (bara)


20. APPENDIX G: FORMATION SAMPLING SUMMARY (RUNS 2D & 2F)

sampling summary.txt
.BOXBEGIN
.CENTER
.WIDE
SAMPLING SUMMARY
.NORMAL
.HLINE
Client: Petro-Canada Netherlands B.V Rig : G.S.F. Labrador

Field : P11b Date: 14-Apr-2008
Well : P11-06 Run : 2D&2F
Sample DLIS Depth Formation Fluid P(form) P(hyd) Mobility Cleanup (l/mns)
====== ==== ===== ========= ===== ======= ====== ======== ===============
[1] 116 1755.2 Oil-leg Oil 175.55 215.32 15 391lt/210min
[2] 126 1754.5 Oil-leg Oil 175.47 215.29 23 141ltr/256min
[3] 144 1733.2 Gas-leg Gas 175.11 212.55 461.7 288ltr/165min
[4] 148 1797.5 Water-leg Water 179.4 219.83 203.2 124ltr/155min
[5] 153 1871.4 Water-leg Water 186.63 228.92 322.1 100ltr/89min
.HLINE
.CENTER
.WIDE
Details
.NORMAL
Flowing Max. Shut-in OCM

Temp. Pressure Drawdown Pressure Predicted GOR
Chamber-Serial (degC) (bar) (bar) (bar) Contam.(%) (m3/m3)
============== ====== ======== ======== ======== ========== =========
[1a] MS1_SPMC-6 #585 72.5 115 60 275 n/a 120
[1b] MS1_SPMC-2 #149 72.6 113 62 273 n/a 115
[2a] MS2_SPMC-6 #090 72.9 140 35.5 190 n/a 120
[2b] MS2_SPMC-2 #047 72.9 138 37.5 230 n/a 120
[2c] MS1_SPMC-3 #510 76.8 138 37.5 190 n/a 120
[2d] MS2_SPMC-3 #075 76.8 188.8 2.3 273 n/a 120
[3a] MS1_MPSR-3 #155 71.6 174.7 0.5 100 n/a n/a

[3b] MS1_MPSR-6 #135 71.6 174.7 0.5 100 n/a n/a
[3c] MS2_MPSR-1 #3261 71.8 174.7 0.5 60 n/a n/a
[3d] MS2_MPSR-5 #153 71.8 174.7 0.5 60 n/a n/a
[3e] MS1_MPSR-4 #3258 71.9 174.5 0.7 130 n/a n/a
Page 1
sampling summary.txt
[3f] MS1_MPSR-1 #3013 71.9 174.5 0.7 120 n/a n/a
[4a] MS1_MPSR-2 #112 74.3 176.6 2.8 260 n/a n/a

[4b] MS2_MPSR-6 #3346 74.3 176.6 2.8 260 n/a n/a
[5a] MS2_MPSR-2 #3252 76.5 186 0.6 250 n/a n/a
[5b] MS2_MPSR-3 #3256 76.5 186 0.6 240 n/a n/a
.HLINE
.WIDE
.CENTER
DATA
.NORMAL
Chamber Volume #Strokes | MRMS Bottle Dead Volume

======= ====== ======== | =========== ===========
SPMC (Oilphase) 250 cc 0.43 | 3 7.2 cc
MPSR (Standard) 450 cc 0.77 | 2 10.2 cc
MRSC-GA (1g) 3.785 l 6.5 | 6 10.3 cc
MRSC-JA (2.75g) 10.41 l 17.8 | 1 11.1 cc
MRSC-EC (6g) 22.71 l 38.8 | 5 12.0 cc
MRSC-ED (18g) 68.14 l 116.5 | 4 12.5 cc
* Hydrocarbon Samples - Dead volume filled with Distilled water

* Water Samples - Dead volume filled with Air
.BOXEND
Page 2
Date: 14/04/2008 Well: P11-06 Client: Petro-Canada Netherlands BV
Sampling File Depth Hydro Formation Temp Pumping Volume Minimum Comments Forecast
Point Number MDBRT TVDSS QG QG QG Time Pumped Draw-Down
(#) (#) (m) (m) (bara) (bara) (degC) (hh:mm) (Litres) Pressure
Samples taken despite slugs still seen

1 116 1755.2 1714.8 215.5 175.4 72.7 3:35 34.8 103.7 on LFA response. N/A
Samples taken at SLB advice due to

2 126 1754.5 1714.1 215.3 175.5 72.6 4:35 141.3 131.2 pump showing signs of potential failure N/A
3 144 1733.2 1692.8 212.6 175.1 71.8 3:45 288.0 174.5 Samples taken with Quick-Siver N/A
Samples taken with Quick-Silver and
clean-up monitored with pH Dye
4 148 1797.5 1757.1 219.8 179.4 74.3 2:25 124.0 176.2 injection N/A
5 153 1871.4 1831.0 228.9 186.6 76.8 1:30 101.0 186.0 injection N/A
Sample Depth Time MRMS Sample Sample Prior to Sampling Sample Opening Closing
Tool MDBRT Start Finish Slot Bottle Chamber Fluid Pumped E. Time Time Pressure Pressure
Type No (m) (hh:mm) (hh:mm) (No) (No) Type (litres) (hh:mm) (hh:mm) (bara) (bara) Formation Sent To
MRMS 173 1755.2 11:47 11:52 6 585 SPMC 23.5 2:20 0:05 324.0 485.0 Volpriehausen (oil) Corelab
MRMS 173 1733.2 14:03 14:07 3 0155 MPSR 134.5 1:23 0:04 n/a 312.0 Volpriehausen (Gas) Corelab
MRMS 173 1797.5 18:31 18:34 2 0112 MPSR 118.0 2:10 0:03 n/a 480.0 Volpriehausen (water) Corelab
MRMS 93 1871.4 21:21 21:26 2 3252 MPSR 81.2 1:15 0:05 n/a 479.0 Hewett (water) Corelab
Tanks not over-pressured due to leaking Seal-valve in MRMS 93 while sampling gas
Tanks sampled using MRMS 93 but were over-pressured OK because the Seal Valve held pressure against water.
FROM RESERVOIR TO RESULTS.
Oilphase-DBR Sampling & Analysis Services

Schlumberger WCP
Unit 46 Howemoss Terrace
Kirkhill Ind Estate
Dyce AB21OGR
Aberdeen Scotland UK
Petro-Canada
MDT Field Operations Report
Job No: OLP 202

Field: Van Ghent
Well: P-11-06
Date: 13 to 16 April 08
Rig: Labrador 1
MDT Suite: TBC
SAMPLING OPERATION PERSONNEL:
Client Representative:
MDT Personnel:
Oilphase Personnel: Craig Coates

Jon Larrsen
Date submitted: 23rd April, 2008

Approved by: Omar Molina
Date: 23rd April, 2008
The data in this report remains the property of the client and may not be disclosed or reproduced without the client's permission.
© 2005 Oilphase-DBR Sampling Services - Sampling Report (Field Test - Rev-01).
Client Petro-Canada Well: P-11-06
Job #: OLP 202 Field: Van Ghent
Date: 13 to 16 April 08 Rig: Labrador 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary ………………………………………………………………….. Page No 2
Sequence of Events …………………………………………………………… Page No 3
Sample Listing ………………………………………………………………… Page No 4
Sample Datasheets ………………………………………...……………………Page No 5
© 2005 Oilphase-DBR Sampling Services - Sampling Report (Field Test - Rev-01). ii
Summary
Oilphase, a division of Schlumberger Well Testing Services was contracted by Petro-Canada to conduct
reservoir fluid sampling on well P-11-06 of the Van Ghent Field of the North Sea. A total of 6 bottomhole
samples were captured using the Oilphase Single Phase Multi-Chamber (SPMC). These tools were all
conveyed by Schlumberger Wireline as part of the Modular Dynamic Tester (MDT) toolstring.
The summary of samples collected is below.
MDT Sampling Run # 2D
A total of six 250cc SPMC samples were captured using the Quicksilver probe module as part of the MDT
string. The probe was set at 1755.2m MDBRT where there were 2 samples captured. The toolstring was
moved and the probe set again at 1754.5m MDBRT where a further 4 samples were captured.
On return to surface all six SPMC's were found to contain samples. The samples were then successfully
transferred into Oilphase Single Phase Sample Bottles (SSB) at reservoir temperature and above
reservoir pressure. A 60cc nitrogen gas cap was introduced to facilitate safe storage and transportation.
MDT Sampling Run # 2F
During this sampling run a total of ten Wireline MPSR conventional samples were captured. They
consisted of six gas samples from a depth of 1733.2m MDBRT and four water samples, two from a depth
of 1757.5m MDBRT and two from 1871.4m MDBRT.
General
All the samples including the Wireline MPSR's were shipped from the rig in an Oilphase container to the
Oilphase base in Aberdeen for onpass to Corelab for further analysis.
© 2005 Oilphase-DBR Sampling Services - Sampling Report (Field Test - Rev-01). 1
Sequence of Events
Date Time Event
13-Apr-08 11:30 Oilphase personnel arrived on the Labrador 1.

12:30 Equipment spotted on rig.
13:30 Commenced rig up of Oilphase equipment.
15:00 Commenced set up of downhole samplers.
18:00 Completed set up of downhole samplers.
21:00 Commenced installing samplers in SLB Wireline Modular Reservoir Multi Sampler (MRMS).
21:40 Completed installation.
14-Apr-08 1:30 Commenced rig up of MDT Toolstring.

3:32 Commenced RIH with MDT Toolstring.
5:00 At depth to commence pumpout for sampling.
9:00 Collected samples 1.01 - 1.04 (Mud and Filtrate Samples)
11:55 Captured sample 1.05 at depth 1755.2m
22:30 Commenced POOH with MDT Toolstring.
23:20 MDT Toolstring at surface.
15-Apr-08 1:30 Samplers removed from MRMS.

9:30 Commenced opening pressures and heated transfers of samples.
14:00 Wireline commenced capture of MPSR samples 1.11 to 1.20 in Run 2F.
17:00 Completed opening pressures and heated transfers of samples.
21:30 Wireline completed sample capture of samples 1.11 to 1.20.
Client: Petro-Canada Well: P-11-06
Job No: OLP 202 Field: Van Ghent
OPEN-HOLE SAMPLE LISTING
Sample Sample Sample Sample Chamber Sample Point P opening Transfer Cond. Final Pressure Bottle Bottle Sample Comments
No Date Time Nature S/N MDBRT bar @ T degC bar @ T degC bar @ T degC S/N Type Vol (cc)
MDT Run No: 2D and 2F
Drilling Fluids
1.01 14-Apr-08 9:00 Mud N/A Active Pit 3 N/A N/A Atmospheric N/A 5L IATA 5 Litre
1.02 14-Apr-08 9:00 Mud N/A Active Pit 3 N/A N/A Atmospheric N/A 5L IATA 5 Litre
1.03 14-Apr-08 9:00 Filtrate N/A N/A N/A N/A Atmospheric N/A Glass Jar 5 cc
1.04 14-Apr-08 9:00 Filtrate N/A N/A N/A N/A Atmospheric N/A Glass Jar 5 cc
Volpriehausen Sand: 1702 - 1801m MD BHP: 175bara, BHT: 73 degC

1.05 14-Apr-08 11:55 Monophasic SPMC 585 1755.2m 324 @ 12 276 @ 73 276 @ 12 5253-EA SinglePhase (SSB) 230 MDT Run 2D
1.07 14-Apr-08 19:50 Monophasic SPMC 090 1754.5m 317 @ 12 276 @ 73 276 @ 12 10319-MA SinglePhase (SSB) 230 MDT Run 2D
1.11 15-Apr-08 14:02 Press. Gas MPSR 0155 1733.2m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 450 MDT Run 2F
1.17 15-Apr-08 18:35 Press. Water MPSR 0112 1757.5m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 450 MDT Run 2F
Hewett Sand: 1871 - 1892m MD BHP: 187bara, BHT: 77 degC

MDT Sample Data Sheet

IDENTIFICATION
Sample No: 1.01 Sample Nature: Mud
Bottle No: N/A Formation: N/A
Sampling Date: 14-Apr-08 MDT Run No: N/A
Sampling Time 9:00 Chamber S/N: N/A
Sampling Point: Active Pit 3
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
Sample Bottle Type: 5L IATA Gas Cap Created: N/A
Sample Bottle Volume: N/A Fluid Remaining: N/A
Sample Volume: 5 Litre Final Pressure: Atmospheric
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
Initial Pressure: N/A Transfer Duration: N/A
Transfer Pressure: N/A Apparent Bubble Point: N/A
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
Formation Pressure: N/A
Formation Temp: N/A
At depth: N/A
Maximum Drawdown: N/A
Pump out Time: N/A
Pump out Volume: N/A
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
Sample No: 1.02 Sample Nature: Mud
Sampling Point: Active Pit 3
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
Sample Bottle Type: 5L IATA Gas Cap Created: N/A
Sample Volume: 5 Litre Final Pressure: Atmospheric
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
Formation Temp: N/A
At depth: N/A
Pump out Time: N/A
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
Sample No: 1.03 Sample Nature: Filtrate
Sampling Point: N/A
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
Sample Bottle Type: Glass Jar Gas Cap Created: N/A
Sample Volume: 5 cc Final Pressure: Atmospheric
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
Formation Temp: N/A
At depth: N/A
Pump out Time: N/A
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
Sample No: 1.04 Sample Nature: Filtrate
Sampling Point: N/A
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
Sample Bottle Type: Glass Jar Gas Cap Created: N/A
Sample Volume: 5 cc Final Pressure: Atmospheric
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
Formation Temp: N/A
At depth: N/A
Pump out Time: N/A
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
Sample No: 1.05 Sample Nature: Monophasic
Bottle No: 5253-EA Formation: Volpriehausen Sand
Sampling Date: 14-Apr-08 MDT Run No: 2D
Sampling Time 11:55 Chamber S/N: SPMC 585
Sampling Point: 1755.2m MDBRT
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
Sample Bottle Type: SinglePhase (SSB) Gas Cap Created: 60 cc (Nitrogen)
Sample Volume: 230 cc Final Pressure: 276 bar @ 12degC
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
Initial Pressure: 324 bar @ 12degC Transfer Duration: 10 mins
Transfer Pressure: 276 bar @ 73degC Apparent Bubble Point: N/A
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
Formation Pressure: 175.5 bar
Formation Temp: 73degC
At depth: 1755.2m MDBRT
Maximum Drawdown: 60 bar
Pump out Time: 139 mins
Pump out Volume: 24 Litres
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
Sample Volume: 230 Final Pressure: 276 bar @ 12degC
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
Maximum Drawdown: 60 bar
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
Bottle No: 10319-MA Formation: Volpriehausen Sand
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
Maximum Drawdown: 35.5 bar
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
Sample No: 1.11 Sample Nature: Press. Gas
Bottle No: N/A Formation: Volpriehausen Sand
Sampling Date: 15-Apr-08 MDT Run No: 2F
Sampling Time 14:02 Chamber S/N: MPSR 0155
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
Sample Bottle Type: MPSR Gas Cap Created: N/A
Sample Bottle Volume: 450 cc Fluid Remaining: N/A
Sample Volume: 450 cc Final Pressure: N/A
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
Formation Pressure: 175 bar
Pump out Time: N/A
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
Pump out Time: N/A
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
Pump out Time: N/A
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
Pump out Time: N/A
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
Pump out Time: N/A
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
Pump out Time: N/A
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
Sample No: 1.17 Sample Nature: Press. Water
Bottle No: N/A Formation: Hewett Sand
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
Formation Pressure: 1757.5m MDBRT
Formation Temp: 175 bar
At depth: 72degC
Pump out Time: N/A
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
At depth: 72degC
Pump out Time: N/A
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
At depth: 77degC
Pump out Time: N/A
REMARKS

IDENTIFICATION
SHIPPING CONDITIONS
TRANSFER CONDITIONS
SAMPLING CONDITIONS
At depth: 77degC
Pump out Time: N/A
REMARKS
N O R TH
SEA
PetroCanada
P11-06
Schlumberger Private
H2S Coupons results
Introduction
•H2S coupons are metal alloys that will loose the metal shine
after exposure to H2S
•H2S coupons should be used a qualitative indicator
•Also H2S can results in the discolouration or tarnishing the
coupons
•Normally 6 coupons (2 of each sensitivity) are run inside the
tool in place of the resistivity cell of the standard probe. In
Quicksilver, there is additional slot which enables the use of
both the coupons and the resistivity cell.
2
Results
Measuring
Coupon H2S Coupons Detection Threshold Range (partial Pressure Detecting
name pressure) (psi) Level ppm S/N
CDA706 1st coupon .005 partial pressure limit 0.005 2538 2.0 3
32
B3 2nd Coupon range .018-.025 partial pressure lower limit 0.018 2538 7.1 38
upper limit 0.025 2538 9.9 40
600 3rd Coupon range .05 - 0.1 partial pressure lower limit 0.05 2538 19.7 30
upper limit 0.1 2538 39.4 33
•Very slight change on the lowest coupons (CDA 706)
•The amount of exposure didn’t discolour or tarnish the
a large section of the coupon
•This is probably an indication that any H2S if any is
below the detection limit which is 1 ppm at 5000 psia.
3

21. APPENDIX H: WIRELINE LOGGING SUMMARY (RUN 1A)

Wireline Logging Report CONFIDENTIAL
Well : P11-06 Run Number : 1A
Rig : Transocean Labrador Logging Company : Schlumberger

Geologist : H. van Gastel Engineers : M. DeVinney / J. Espinosa
Date : 09/04/2008 Tool String : DSI-PPC-TLD-GR-ACTS-LEH-QT
Latitude : 52° 21' 46.964"N Grid : 5801617.91m N
Longitude : 03° 24' 25.605"E Grid : 527761.71m E
Permanent Datum : Mean Sea Level Elevation : 34.0m water depth
Drilling Datum : Rotary Table Elevation : 40.0m
Mud Type : KCl-Gem-Polymer pH : 8.7
Mud Density : 1.20 sg Oil / Water : n/a
Fluid Loss : 4.5 ml/30 mins Chlorides : 64,000 mg/l
Viscosity : 46 sec/qt Barite (state content) : 122.07 kg/m3
Hole Size : 12.25” Casing Size : 13.375”
KOP : n/a Max Hole Angle @ Depth : 2.1° @ 227m
Hole Condition : reasonable Tight Spots / Dog Legs : O/P 1548m – 1375m
TD Driller : 1704m Casing Driller : 793.7m
TD Logger : 1687.2m Casing Logger : 793m
Date TD Reached : 09/04/2008 Last Circulation Stopped : 09/04/2008
Time TD Reached : 05:30 Last Circulation Time : 10:00
Max Rec Temperatures : 64 °C Time Since Last Circulation Stopped : 8:35 hrs
Source of Mud Sample : Flowline
Rm (ohmm @ ° C) :
Rmf (ohmm @ ° C) :
Rmc (ohmm @ ° C) :
Interval Logged : 1687.2m – 74m
Log Speed : 1800 ft/hr
Interval of Repeat : 1450m – 1312m
Total Time
Operation Summary : From To
(hrs:mins)
Pre-job safety meeting 15:00 15:15 00:15
Rig up sheave wheels 15:15 15:45 00:45
Make up tool string and perform pre-cal and surface check 15:45 16:40 01:40
Load sources in TLD tool 16:40 16:50 01:50
RIH cased hole 16:50 17:20 02:20
Log down from casing shoe to 1450m at 4000-5000 ft/hr 17:20 17:55 02:55
Open calliper, log repeat section from 1450m to 1312m 17:55 18:15 03:15
Close calliper, log down to 1640m 18:15 18:30 03:30
Continue RIH and prepare for main pass 18:30 18:35 03:35
Several attempts to pass HUD at 1687.2m without success 18:35 18:45 03:45
Open calliper, log main pass to 730m, inside 13 3/8” casing 18:45 20:35 05:35
Close calliper, RIH at 4000 ft/hr to 830m 20:35 20:40 05:40
Log cased hole DSI-GR to sea bed 20:40 22:05 07:05
POOH to surface 22:05 22:10 07:10
Remove source from TLD 22:10 22:25 07:25
After calibrations 22:25 22:45 07:45
Lay down tool string 22:45 23:15 08:15
Rig down sheave wheels 23:15 23:30 08:30
Page 1 of 2 Petro-Canada Netherlands

Wireline Logging Report CONFIDENTIAL
Tool problems, Hole problems, Lost time, Log quality remarks, Interpretation remarks etc. :
Unable to pass 1687.2m when RIH to TD for main pass. Several attempts were made at different RIH
speeds, but holding up at the same depth. Decision was made to log up the main pass from 1687.2m.
No hole problems during logging main pass.
Good repeatability of log data. Sonic data may require re-processing.

Additional Comments :
Schlumberger first RIH procedures followed.

Wireline difference versus LWD depth:
At top Chalk: 0.0m
At top Upper Holland: +0.1m
At top Middle Holland: +0.8m
At top Lower Holland: +0.5m
At top Vlieland: + 0.3m
Cased hole sonic logged with medium frequency to improve data.
Reported by : H. van Gastel
Page 2 of 2 Petro-Canada Netherlands


22. APPENDIX I: WIRELINE QC REPORT (GAIA EARTH SCIENCES)

CONFIDENTIAL
Wireline logging report

on
Schlumberger
Van Ghent Prospect

P11-06
GSF Labrador
8 ½ˮ Hole (TD) Section
12th -17th April 2008

Written by Ian Barwick of GAIA Earth Sciences Ltd.
on behalf of Petro-Canada Netherlands BV

CONFIDENTIAL
Contents
1. Introduction.................................................................................................... 4
2. Background & Objectives .............................................................................. 4
3. Well data ....................................................................................................... 5
4. Safety ............................................................................................................ 5
5. Schlumberger personnel and equipment on site: .......................................... 6

5.1. GSF Labrador Crew Movements: ...................................................................................6
5.2. Equipment on board:.......................................................................................................7
6. Job preparation and planning ........................................................................ 8
6.1. General............................................................................................................................8
6.2. Tool-strings & Operational Checks .................................................................................9
6.2.1. DSI-HRLA-TLD-MCFL-CAL-CNL-HNGS-SP ........................................................................... 9
6.2.2. FMI-GPIT-GR .......................................................................................................................... 9
6.2.3. MDT-GR Pressures ................................................................................................................. 9
6.2.4. MDT-GR Samples (Run 2D & 2F) ......................................................................................... 10
6.2.5. VSI-GR .................................................................................................................................. 10
6.2.6. MSCT-GR.............................................................................................................................. 10
6.2.7. CBL-CCL-GR......................................................................................................................... 10
7. Logging Runs (8 ½” hole 1892-1703 m) ...................................................... 11

7.1. RUN 2A DSI-HRLA-TLD-MCFL-CAL-CNL-HNGS-SP..................................................12
7.1.1. Observations and Log Quality Control ................................................................................... 12
7.2. RUN 2B FMI-GPIT-GR..................................................................................................13
7.3. RUN 2C MDT-GR .........................................................................................................13
7.4. RUN 2D MDT-GR Samples ..........................................................................................15
7.5. RUN 2E VSI-GR............................................................................................................16
7.6. RUN 2F MDT-GR Samples...........................................................................................17
7.7. RUN 2G MSCT-GR.......................................................................................................18
7.8. RUN 2H CBL-CCL-GR..................................................................................................19
8. Summary & Recommendations ................................................................... 21

8.1. Summary .......................................................................................................................21
8.2. Recommendations ........................................................................................................21
8.2.1. Logistics & Equipment: .......................................................................................................... 21
8.2.2. Technical: .............................................................................................................................. 21
8.2.3. Personnel: ............................................................................................................................. 22
9. Appendices.................................................................................................. 23
9.1. Well Sketch (not to scale) .............................................................................................23
9.2. Bottom Hole Temperature.............................................................................................24
9.3. Toolstring configurations ...............................................................................................25
9.3.1. Run 2A DSI-HRLA-TLD-CAL-MCFL-CNL-HNGS-SP ............................................................ 25
9.3.2. Run 2B FMI-GPIT .................................................................................................................. 26
9.3.3. Run 2C MDT-GR Pressures .................................................................................................. 27
9.3.4. Run 2D MDT-GR Samples .................................................................................................... 28
9.3.5. Run 2E VSI-GR ..................................................................................................................... 29

CONFIDENTIAL
9.3.6. Run 2F MDT-GR Samples..................................................................................................... 30
9.3.7. Run 2G MSCT-GR................................................................................................................. 31
9.3.8. Run 2H CBL-CCL-GR............................................................................................................ 32
9.4. Operations Timing (Run Summary & detailed Breakdown) ..........................................33
9.4.1. Run 2A DSI-HRLA-TLD-MCFLCAL-CNL-HNGS-SP ............................................................. 33
9.4.2. Run 2B FMI-GPIT-GR ........................................................................................................... 35
9.4.5. Run 2E VSI-GR ..................................................................................................................... 41
9.4.7. Run 2G MSCT-GR................................................................................................................. 45
9.4.8. Run 2H CBL-CCL-GR............................................................................................................ 48
9.5. Log Headers..................................................................................................................50
9.5.1. Run 2A DSI-HRLA-TLD-MCFL-CAL-CNL-HNGS-SP ............................................................ 50
9.5.2. Run 2B FMI-GPIT .................................................................................................................. 51
9.5.5. Run 2E VSI-GR ..................................................................................................................... 54
9.5.7. Run 2G MSCT-GR................................................................................................................. 56
9.5.8. Run 2H CBL-CCL-GR............................................................................................................ 57
9.6. MDT Summary ..............................................................................................................58
9.6.1. Formation Pressures table..................................................................................................... 58
9.6.2. Sample Summary table ......................................................................................................... 59
9.6.3. Formation Pressures ............................................................................................................. 60
9.6.4. Hydrostatic Pressures............................................................................................................ 60
9.6.5. Gauge Temperatures............................................................................................................. 61
9.6.6. Mobilities................................................................................................................................ 61
9.7. MSCT Summary Sheet .................................................................................................62
9.8. P11-06 8 ½” Section Service Quality Issues.................................................................64
9.9. Wireline Job Execution Summary .................................................................................65
10. About the Author ......................................................................................... 66

CONFIDENTIAL
1. Introduction
This report covers an audit of Schlumberger wireline operations for the TD logging of the
Van Ghent Prospect exploration well P11-06 which took place from 12th-17th April 2008.
The broad purpose of the audit was to ensure:
• To observe that a safe and efficient operation was carried out by Schlumberger, in line
with Petro-Canada objectives.
• To ensure that high quality data was recorded by Schlumberger and the logging
programme was adhered to.
• To make third party recommendations for improved logging performance in the
future.
2. Background & Objectives

The Van Ghent structure is located offshore on the Dutch Continental Shelf in block P11b
and is situated approx. 55 km Northwest of The Hague. The Van Ghent prospect is a NW-
SE trending combination trap. The Lower Cretaceous Vlieland shales lay unconformably
over the SSW dipping Triassic Volpriehausen sandstones and act as a top seal.
The reservoir bearing section of the Van Ghent structure directly correlates to the seismic
section encountered in the P11-03 discovery well of the De Ruyter field. A clean and
porous sandstone was evaluated in the discovery well and seismic correlations indicate a
similar sand body could be present in P11-06.
Specific objectives for the 8 ½” TD section logging were outlined as:
• Determine the presence, thickness and quality of the target formation (Volpreihausen
Sands) and gather data on the in-situ fluids.
• Obtain data for geological analysis.
• Obtain data for geomechanical analysis.
• Determine the pressure profiles in hydrocarbon bearing zones (oil/gas).
• Determine reservoir contacts for gas/oil/water.
• Obtain quality hydrocarbon samples (oil/gas).
• Obtain water samples.
• Obtain data for surface seismic calibration.
• Obtain rotary sidewall cores.

CONFIDENTIAL
3. Well data
Well No: P11-06 Rig: GSF Labrador
Field/Block: Van Ghent Prospect RTE 40 (m)
Country: Netherlands Water Depth 34 (m)
Logging Company: Schlumberger UTM: 5,801,617.91m Northing
Latitude: 52° 21’ 46.964” N 527,761.71m Easting
Longitude 03° 24’ 27.645” E
Mud Type: Salt / Polymer Rm @ temp: 0.045 @ 10°C

Density: 1.22 (s.g.) Rmf @ temp: 0.041 @ 10°C
Viscosity: 41 (s/qt) Rmc @ temp: 0.061 @ 10°C
Fluid Loss: 3.4 (cc/30m) Cl (whole mud): 172,000 (mg/L)
Ph: 9.4 OWR -/88
Solids: 1.9 (% vol)
Bit size: 8.5” (in) Section TD: 1892 (m)

Casing size: 9.625” (in) Casing shoe: 1703 (m)
Casing weight: 47 (lb/ft) Casing ID: 8.681 (in)
Max. Deviation: 1.24 (open hole) (deg) @ 1771.6 (m)
Drillers’ depths are used in the table above. Mud data is from final circulation before first rig
up, and copied directly from the mud report, courtesy Baroid Fluid Services.
4. Safety
Schlumberger performed in a safe manner throughout the entire time offshore.
• On arrival to the GSF Labrador an extensive induction course and rig tour was
attended by all personnel.
• The GSF FOCUS (Incident Prevention Programme) system was used throughout the
operation. JRAs, Mini-Prompts and Tool Box Talks were used at each shift change
and before the rig up and rig down of the wireline tools & equipment.
• A boat drill was attended by all crew on board the rig at 11:30 on 12th April.
• Schlumberger participation in the Focus Card system was not as high as Petro-Canada
& GSF would have expected. The majority of the Schlumberger personnel were very
busy during their time off-shore but more effort should be made on future jobs to
submit more cards.
• It was noted that Schlumberger personnel did not attend the Service Meetings held
daily at 19:00. These meetings are also used to discuss safety issues so every effort
should be made for at least one Schlumberger attendee to be present.
• A number of Focus cards were submitted by the GSF rig crew concerning
Schlumberger operations. This shows good awareness and understanding of third
party operations by the GSF crew.
At the request of Petro-Canada the following Safety related issues that occurred during the 12
¼” job have been recorded in this report.
• On the 12 ¼” intermediate logging run it was already noted that barriers were not
placed on the stairs leading to the rig floor prior to handling radioactive sources.

CONFIDENTIAL
• On the 12 ¼” intermediate logging run the announcement informing the rig personnel
about handling these sources was not heard by the DSV & WSG although it was
stressed by the SLB engineer that such an announcement had to be made.
5. Schlumberger personnel and equipment on site:

The Schlumberger personnel on site are listed below.
Engineer: Javier Espinosa – Days (7 yrs – General Field Engineer)

Vladimir Mukhin – Nights (6 yrs – General Field Engineer)
Specialists: Kenny Gordon – Seismic Engineer

Rob Lagestee – MSCT Specialist
Operators: Boris Ivanov – Days (Crewchief)

Marco Zeegers – Nights (Crewchief + MDT Specialist)
Kazbek Ediyev – Days
Mikie De Witte – Nights
Some logging tools (DSI & PEX) had remained on board after the 12 ¼” logging job. The rest
of the tools arrived on board the rig at 13:00 on 12th April.
5.1. GSF Labrador Crew Movements:

All logging crew movements during the job are summarised in the table below:
Designation Name Arrived Departed Duration (days)
GAIA QC Ian Barwick 12-Apr-08 18-Apr-08 7

Engineer Javier Espinosa 08-Apr-08 16-Apr-08 9
Engineer Vladimir Mukhin 12-Apr-08 18-Apr-08 7
MSCT Specialist Rob Lagestee 13-Apr-08 17-Apr-08 5
Seismic Specialist Kenny Gordon 13-Apr-08 15-Apr-08 3
Operator - CC Boris Ivanov 08-Apr-08 18-Apr-08 11
Operator - CC Marco Zeegers 12-Apr-08 17-Apr-08 6
Operator Kazbek Ediyev 08-Apr-08 18-Apr-08 11
Operator Mikie De Witte 12-Apr-08 17-Apr-08 6
Oil Phase Craig Coates 13-Apr-08 16-Apr-08 4
Oil Phase Jon Larssen 13-Apr-08 16-Apr-08 4
GAIA QC Rig days 7
Total Engineer days 16
Total Specialist days 5
Total Operator days 34
Total Oil Phase days 8
One crew consisting of Javier Espinosa, Boris Ivanov and Kazbek Ediyev had arrived on 8th
April 2008 to perform the intermediate logging in the 12 ¼” section. The above table has not
accounted for crew days that have already been charged for on the 12 ¼” intermediate section
ticket.

CONFIDENTIAL
5.2. Equipment on board:
Equipment on board for the 8 ½” logging is summarised in the table below:
Toolstring/Equipment Comments Arrival on rig
PEX Full backup On board from 12 ¼” Logging

DSI Full backup On board from 12 ¼” Logging
HRLA Full backup 12-Apr-08
HGNS Full backup 12-Apr-08
SP Sub Full backup 12-Apr-08
AH-107 (knuckles) Multiple on board 12-Apr-08
ACTS Full backup 12-Apr-08
SAH-F (swivels) Only one available 12-Apr-08
FMI Full backup 12-Apr-08
GPIT Full backup 12-Apr-08
SGT (Gamma Ray) Full backup 12-Apr-08
MRPC (MDT Power) Full backup 12-Apr-08
MRMS (MDT Tank Carrier) Two on-board, both will be run. 12-Apr-08
MRSC (1 Gallon Chamber) Two on-board, both will be run. 12-Apr-08
MRPO (MDT Pump-out) One standard Displacement Unit 12-Apr-08
MRPO (MDT Pump-out) One High Pressure Displacement Unit 12-Apr-08
MRHY (MDT Hydraulics) Two on-board, both will be run. 12-Apr-08
MRPS (Single-probe) One available 12-Apr-08
MRPQ (Quick-Silver) Full backup 12-Apr-08
LFA (pH) One available 12-Apr-08
LFA One available 12-Apr-08
MPSR Sample Tanks 12 available 12-Apr-08
SPMC Sample Tanks 7 available 12-Apr-08
VSI Sonde Two on board 12-Apr-08
SGT (GR for MSCT) Only one available 12-Apr-08
MSCT Only one available 12-Apr-08
CCL Full Backup 12-Apr-08
CBL Only one Sonde available 12-Apr-08
LEH-QT (head with tension) Full Backup 12-Apr-08
ECRD Full Backup On board from 12 ¼” Logging
TLC 1 Equipment Not onboard -
LWF 2 Equipment Not onboard -
Fishing kit Onboard with 4 ½” IF crossover. Resident onboard
Back-off/Free-point Explosives on rig. Hardware available -
onshore
Main cable 7-46 VXS; max pull 9705 lbs; 5,500 m long Resident onboard
Spare Cable None onboard. -
Rig-up equipment Standard duty type. Resident onboard
Radioactive sources One set. On board from 12 ¼” Logging
Logging Unit - 480 Can pull to maximum line pull (8000 lbs) Resident onboard
• The following was back-loaded on 15th April – 2 x PEX, 1 x HRLA, 2 x DSI, 1 x FMI
and the radioactive sources
1
TLC = Tough Logging Conditions (for running tools on drill pipe)
2
LWF = Logging While Fishing (to continue logging after fishing)

CONFIDENTIAL
6. Job preparation and planning
6.1. General
• The cable used on the unit, serial number #74205, is detailed below. The cable was
generally in good condition, with no splices. Approximately 500m of cable had been
chopped off before the job began due to general wear and tear.
CABLE SAFE PULL

CABLE WEIGHT
UNIT CABLE LENGTH (m) [50% breaking
/1000FT [LBS]
strain]
OSU-F #480 7-46ZVXS 5,200 9705 lbs 331 (in air)
• It was decided to run an ECRD for the first run in hole due to the uncertainty over hole
condition. An ECRD was also to be used for all MDT operations due to the increased
chance of getting stuck. Due to this it was decided to leave the ECRD in the
configuration for Run 2B (FMI) to limit the number of cable-head changes.
• A tan weak-point (6K – 6.7K lbs) was used for Run 2E, 2G & 2H. The requirement is
that the weak-point can be broken at TD (if need be) without exceeding 50% of the
breaking strain of the cable.
• The fishing kit was thoroughly checked, including standard 2 5/16” grapples for the
Schlumberger LEH logging head and an 8 ½” bowl for the Bowen overshot. The
fishing equipment is supplied with a 4 ½” I.F. female connection.
• The IDW (Integrated depth wheel) and CMTD (Cable Mounted Tension Device) were
in good condition and had been recently calibrated, as per the table below.
IDW No. 6111

IDW Calibration Date 31-Jan-2008
Encoder #1 Wheel Correction -6 for 7-46 ZVXS
Encoder #2 Wheel Correction -6 for 7-46 ZVXS
CMTD No. 1545
CMTD Calibration date 09-Apr-2008
• All presentations were prepared based on the programme requirements, with standard
curves being recorded on the log.
• Run nomenclature for the job was based on the sequence provided by Petro-Canada.
The runs were to be numbered Run 2A, 2B….. etc. with the letter incrementing with
each additional tool-string to be run in hole.
• Schlumberger had set up a satellite link to enable their ‘Log Moderators’ to have
access to the data real-time. This was set up for Schlumberger’s benefit; Petro-Canada
did not have direct access to the live data.

CONFIDENTIAL
6.2. Tool-strings & Operational Checks
The original logging programme for the TD section was as follows:
SERVICE MNEMONICS
Platform Express, Laterolog Induction, Spontaneous PEX-HRLA-DSI-HNGS-SP-ECRD

Potential, Sonic & spectral gamma ray
Resistivity Image Log FMI-GPIT-GR-ECRD
Formation Tester – pressures & samples MDT-GR-ECRD
Seismic Check-shot VSI
Rotary Coring MSCT-GR
Cement Bond Log CBL-GR
The actual tool configurations run are detailed below.
6.2.1. DSI-HRLA-TLD-MCFL-CAL-CNL-HNGS-SP
• The HRLA was used for resistivity measurement since the well was drilled with a
water based mud with high chloride content.
• A normal bow-spring was prepared for the HGNS (CNL measurement).
• No wear rings were present on the HGNS
• Eight 2 ½” standoffs were used on the HRLA and DSI as per tool sketch.
• All master calibrations were in tolerance.
Tool Calibrated Function Note

HRLA - 812 12-Apr-08 Primary O.K.
TLD - 276 03-Apr-08 Primary O.K.
HGNS - 755 5-Apr-08 Primary O.K.
HNGS - 83 12-Apr-08 Primary O.K.
• The tool-sketch can be seen in Appendix 9.3.1
6.2.2. FMI-GPIT-GR
• The GPIC (Inclinometry cartridge) was magnetically isolated by non magnetic
spacers, approximately 4 ft above and below its sensors.
• A 2 ½” standoffs was placed on the top part of the FMI housing
• The tool-sketch can be seen in Appendix 9.3.2.
6.2.3. MDT-GR Pressures

• An standard hole kit was fitted on the MDT Standard Probe module.
• Gauge calibrations were as per the table below.
Gauge Range (psi) S/N Master Cal date

CQG 15,000 3347 11-Oct-07
Strain Gauge 20,000 189237 04-Feb-08

CONFIDENTIAL
6.2.4. MDT-GR Samples (Run 2D & 2F)

• The tool was configured with a Standard Probe and a Quick-silver probe to allow for
full flexibility down-hole
• The Depth was referenced to the Quick-Silver probe; the Standard probe is physically
5.3m above this.
• Only one Fluid Analyser (LFA) was run; it was used to monitor the sample line. Fluid
analysis on the ‘Guard’ line was not possible.
• The Quick-Silver was configured with a Standard Pressure Displacement Unit below
the probe for the ‘Guard’ line and a High Pressure Displacement Unit above the probe
for the ‘Sample’ line.
• For Run 2D the MRMS (Tank Carriers) were configured with 3 x SPMC and 3 x
MPSR tanks in each carrier.
• For Run 2F only MPSR tanks were run, totalling 12 x MPSRs.
• For both runs the tool was configured with 2 x 1 gallon tanks; one for sampling and
the other full of dye to allow for pH monitoring during the water sampling.
• Gauge calibrations were as per the table below.
Gauge Range (psi) S/N Master Cal date

MRPS CQG 15,000 3347 11-Oct-07
MRPS Strain Gauge 20,000 189237 04-Feb-08
MRPS CQG 15,000 2919 03-Sep-07
MRPS Strain Gauge 10,000 184917 14-Mar-08
LFA - 8505 09-Apr-08
• The tool-sketch can be seen in Appendix 9.3.4 and 9.3.6
6.2.5. VSI-GR
• Two VSI sondes were run to allow for a down-hole contingency.
• Full details of the VSI tool configuration can be found in the VSI Check-shot QC
report prepared by Martin Ellis of RPS.
6.2.6. MSCT-GR
• The MSCT tool was configured with a double core barrel enabling 50 core samples to
be taken
6.2.7. CBL-CCL-GR
• The CBL was centralised with three Gemco centralisers of 9” diameter (fully open)
that were placed above and below the sonde and another on top of the telemetry
cartridge.

CONFIDENTIAL
7. Logging Runs (8 ½” hole 1892-1703 m)
The following is a brief report on the events during the logging job, along with some
comments and interpretations. The summary of logging runs is shown below, with individual
time breakdowns in Appendix 9.4, and log headers in Appendix 9.5.
RUN TIME (HRS:MINS)

SERVICE FROM TO NOTE
NO TOT DNPT NPT OP LT
DSI-HRLA-TLD-CNL- 19:30 02:45

2A 08:45 00:00 00:00 08:45 00:00
HNGS-SP 12-Apr 13-Apr
02:45 08:30
2B FMI-GPIT-GR-ECRD 05:45 00:00 00:00 05:45 00:00
13-Apr 13-Apr
2C MDT Pressures
8 08:30
13-Apr
00:30
14-Apr
16:00 00:00 00:00 16:00 01:10 1&2
2D MDT Samples
8 00:30
14-Apr
01:00
15-Apr
24:30 00:00 00:00 24:30 04:20 3
01:00 06:30
2E VSI-GR 05:30 00:00 00:00 05:30 00:00
15-Apr 15-Apr
2F MDT Samples
8 06:30
15-Apr
00:15
16-Apr
17:45 00:00 02:30 17:45 04:15 4,5 & 6
2G MSCT-GR
8 11:00
16-Apr
01:15
17-Apr
14:15 00:00 02:00 14:15 02:00 7&8
01:15 06:30
2H CBL-CCL-GR 05:15 00:00 00:00 05:15 00:00
17-Apr 17-Apr
OVERALL JOB TOTALS 97:45 00:00 04:30 97:45 11:45

OVERALL SCHLUMBERGER EFFICIENCY
88.0% (to be confirmed)
[1-LT/OT]x 100%
TOT - Total Operation Time

OP - Operation Time = TOT-(NPT+DNPT)
LT - Lost Time against Schlumberger
NPT - Wireline related Non-Productive Time not recorded against Schlumberger
DNPT - Drilling related Non-Productive Time not recorded against Schlumberger
DOWNTIME (HRS) START END

NOTE COMMENT
DNPT NPT LT TIME TIME
It was noted that the strain and quartz gauges in the MDT
1 - - 00:40 12:00 12:40 were reading differently. Tool was pulled to surface and
gauges flushed with silicon oil
2 - - 00:30 17:00 17:30 MDT failed to set at 1758.3m. It was believed to be a

CONFIDENTIAL
solenoid valve issue in the MRPS (standard probe). The
valves were cycled a number of times downhole and the tool
began to work again.
Pump-out module started to ‘short-stroke’. MDT pulled to
3 - - 04:20 20:40 01:00
surface for service
Replacing the full SPMC tanks with empty MPSR tanks
4 - 02:30 - 06:30 09:00
(additional to programme)
Continued NPT for ‘short-stroking’ pump as tool is run back
5 - - 03:30 09:00 12:30
in hole on Run 2F
Seal valve failure on the Upper MRMS during gas sampling.
6 - - 00:45 14:15 15:00 Caused two gas pressures to be taken with no over-pressure.
Seal valve worked during water samples.
MSCT unable to pass 1708m. Pull out of hole to install hole-
7 - 02:00 - 12:40 14:40
finder.
8 - - 02:00 16:00 18:00 MSCT Bit Box would not fully rotate to ‘eject’
7.1. RUN 2A DSI-HRLA-TLD-MCFL-CAL-CNL-HNGS-SP
The GSF Labrador is a jack-up type rig which enabled a standard rig-up. The wireline unit is
positioned on top of the accommodation module which is at a higher level than the rig-floor.
The unit is slightly off-set from centre which does mean the unit needs to be pivoted
occasionally to allow the wireline to be spooled correctly when pulling back to surface.
First run in-hole depth control procedures were performed as a quality check to the correlation
log (Run 1A). A depth shift of +1.0m was necessary to match the depth acquired on Run 1A;
this is well within expected tolerances. A summary of depths (post depth shift) is shown in the
table below.
Logger Driller Diff.

(m) (m) (m)
Casing Shoe (CS) 1703.0 1703.0 0.0
Total Depth (TD) 1892.5 1892.0 +0.5
A down log with a reduced data set was acquired at 3600 ft/hr, no hang-ups were experienced
on the way in-hole. The main log was logged in high resolution with the DSI configured to
acquire Monopole & Upper Dipole resulting in a maximum logging speed of 1800 ft/hr. It
was decided to complete the Main Log first to ensure a full data set was obtained as soon as
possible. The Main Log was continued into casing and up to 1400m to allow a good
correlation with the 12 ¼” logs (Run 1A).
7.1.1. Observations and Log Quality Control
DEPTH CONTROL: Good depth control.
HRLA & SP: Good data and repeatability. The SP curve did respond appropriately across the
shale / sand boundaries but the character was limited.
CNL, TLD & HNGS: All good data and repeatability. HCAL Calliper read within 8.49”
inside the 9 5/8” Casing which had an I.D of 8.681”, a +0.2” shift was made to the calliper
data.

CONFIDENTIAL
DSI: Good data acquired
TEMP: Three thermometers were run in the logging head; two read 69˚C, the third was
broken.
7.2. RUN 2B FMI-GPIT-GR
Three complete passes were acquired with the FMI at different pad forces in an attempt to
strike a good balance between pad contact and reducing the stick & pull effect seen at higher
pad forces. Each pass was logged up into casing but the voltage removed from the FMI pads
before casing was entered to prevent damage to the tool.
The integrated borehole volume calculated from 1892m to 1703m (casing shoe) using the
corrected calliper readings was 6.99 M3. The cement volume across the same interval if the 7”
liner was installed was calculated at 2.29 M3.
DEPTH CONTROL: Good agreement with Run 2A
FMI: There was poor pad contact in places and evidence of stick & pull in others. The data
will need to be processed. One button failed but this can be interpolated during the processing.
The FMI callipers read 9.05” & 9.3” inside the 8.681” ID casing, data was shifted
accordingly. This error in the calliper data is out-with normal tolerances; it may have diverse
effects on the quality of the dip calculations.
GPIT: All log QC indicators were in tolerance. The Directional Azimuth is meaningless in
vertical holes.
TEMP: Three thermometers were run in the logging head giving readings of 72˚C, 73˚C &
73˚C.
7.3. RUN 2C MDT-GR
The MDT was run in a simplified configuration to acquire pressures only. The original
programme had accounted for a single MDT run to acquire both pressures and samples but a
change in plan was necessary because neither type of sample tank (MPSR or SPMC) were
installed into the MDT tank carriers at this point in time. The SPMC tanks were not ready
because the Oil Phase personnel had not yet arrived on the rig. The reason the MPSR tanks
were not prepared is discussed in the ‘Summary & Recommendations’ section.
The gauge readings were checked at surface; both the strain gauge and quartz gauges were
within specification at atmospheric pressure. The MDT was run in-hole but with the tool at
1200m the gauge readings differed considerably. The tool was pulled back to surface and the
gauges flushed with silicon oil.

CONFIDENTIAL
Once at casing shoe the gauges were allowed to stabilise until the temperature was changing
at a rate of less than 0.2ºC/min. The original pressure point programme listed 22 stations;
these were to be performed from shallowest to deepest. The general protocol for the pressure
readings was as follows:
• Approach the station from below to ensure good depth control
• Record ‘hydrostatic before’ pressure over a period of no more than 1 minute
• Set the probe and perform a drawdown of 7-10cc at a rate of 60cc/min with the
pressure drop limited at 100 Bar. These parameters were adjusted where mobility was
very high.
• Formation pressures were considered stable when three consecutive readings were
recorded with <0.001 Bar change.
• Repeat draw-downs were taken if the pressure looked suspect or if small super-
charging was present.
• If the test was obviously dry or very super-charged the pressure test was abandoned
• With a good pressure recorded the probe was retracted and the ‘hydrostatic after’
pressure recorded for 1 minute.
• After any MDT setting the tool was run in hole to allow the tool to drop off the
formation.
After the completion of 11 pressure points the probe failed to set at 1758.3m. It was evident
the hydraulic pressure was available in the tool but the pressure was not being directed to the
correct places in the Standard Probe module to allow the tool to open. There are a number of
solenoid valves in the MRPS (Standard Probe module) to direct the hydraulic pressure
supplied by the MRHY (Hydraulic Module). These solenoids were cycled numerous times
with the tool down-hole and eventually the tool returned to a fully functioning state. The
original pressure test programme was then completed.
At the request of Petro-Canada the pressure point at 1733.2m was repeated to give confidence
that the tool was operating correctly after the solenoid problem. In addition four new pressure
points were requested to better define the fluid contact depths.
During the pressure survey the tool was mistakenly set at 1777.5m instead of the requested
1775.5m. The mistake was only noticed after the tool was set so it was decided to record a
pressure at this depth before moving to the correct depth.
In total there were 28 tool settings (only 27 requested) which produced 26 good pressures; the
other two tests were tight. Repeat draw-downs were made at three pressure points.
DEPTH CONTROL: Good agreement with Run 2A.
MDT: The Hydro-static gradient across the survey indicated a mud weight of 1.25 g/cc, this
compares to a reported mud weight of 1.22 g/cc. The Hydro-before and Hydro-after values
were generally in agreement of <0.1 Bar.
The pressure data yielded three gradients in the Volpriehausen; a gas gradient of 0.066psi/ft,
an oil gradient of 0.287psi/ft and a water gradient of 0.431psi/ft. The water gradient also

CONFIDENTIAL
extended down into the Hewett formation. The repeated pressure point at 1733.2m, acquired
for data quality assurance agreed within 0.014 Bar.
75˚C.
7.4. RUN 2D MDT-GR Samples
The original sampling programme requested 6 x SPMC samples in the oil leg, 4 x MPSR
samples in the gas leg, 2 x MPSR samples in the water leg and possibly an additional 1 gallon
sample of water. It was planned to use the Quick-Silver probe to sample the oil and water, the
Standard Probe was considered sufficient for the gas sampling.
It was decided to take the oil samples first given their importance. The Quick-Silver probe
was set at 1751.8m, a pre-test confirmed that the zone had good mobility and the clean-up
began initially using a single pump. Almost immediately the Fluid Analyser (LFA) indicated
high levels of gas were present. The pump speed was dropped to limit the draw-down because
it was assumed that the gas was coming out of solution from the oil. Even at slow pump
speeds with very little draw-down the predominant fluid being pumped was still gas. It was
decided that the tool must be too close to the GOC to allow an oil sample to be achieved so
the pumping was stopped after 25.5 litres (55 mins) and a sample depth chosen lower down.
It the proved difficult to find a suitable oil sample point. The tool was set five times at various
depths across the 9m oil leg, the formation was either tight or collapsing where the mobility
was high enough to attempt a sample causing tool plugging and lost seals. At this point
concern was expressed by Schlumberger that if the Quick-Silver was used for multiple pre-
tests whilst looking for a suitable sample point the inner seal may get stripped away. It was
decided to seat the tool and start pumping without a pre-test, using the draw-down seen at the
pump initiation as a mobility indicator.
Eventually an apparently reasonable sample depth was found at 1755.2m. The clean-up was
initially conducted using a single pump through the Quick-Silver probe. When the second
pump was started and the flow split between the ‘guard’ and ‘sample’ lines the draw-down on
the formation was excessive (almost 150 Bar), even at the slowest pump speeds. The
formation mobility was not high enough to allow both pumps to be operational so the clean-
up was conducted with a single pump. Doing this removes any advantage gained from the
Quick-Silver design, the only benefit was that a larger area was available for fluid to be
pumped from.
After struggling at this point for over 2 hours only 20 litres had been pumped out. The LFA
was showing large slugs of water and occasional gas mixed in with a reasonably clean oil
flow, the formation was drawing down to 103.7 Bar. Discussions were held with Mike Eynon
of Petro-Canada and it was decided to take two samples at this point as a precaution and then
to try elsewhere. A total of 34.8 litres was pumped at this depth. A pre-test was taken after the
sampling and it was found to have a mobility of 2.5mD, which is generally considered too
low for sampling.
Again there were difficulties in finding a decent oil sampling point. There were an additional
five tool settings with no success, each time the formation was found to be tight. Eventually

CONFIDENTIAL
the pre-test at 1754.5m yielded a mobility of 23.5mD so it was decided to sample at that
depth. Again the clean-up was conducted with a single pump, when attempting to use the
second pump a large draw-down was evident once again. Early on in the clean-up the probe
plugged and the tool had to retracted and unblocked by reversing the pumps. At this depth the
flow from the formation was much better, a draw-down pressure of 131.2 Bar was
maintained, 44 Bar below the formation pressure. Again there was evidence of water slugs on
the LFA response, especially on the down stroke; these slugs were diminishing with time
though. After 3.5 hours of pumping it was noted that the pump module was showing signs of
failure. The pump was not holding pressure along the whole length of the stroke, this leads to
a slower pump rate and may eventually have meant fluid could not be pumped at all.
At Schlumberger’s recommendation sampling began after 128 litres had been pumped out
over 4 hours. It would have been preferable to carry on the clean-up process at this depth but
Petro-Canada felt it was better to follow Schlumberger’s advice. There were 4 x SPMC
samples taken at this depth. A total of 141.3 litres was pumped from the formation.
With the tool closed the status of the pump was checked by pumping mud through the flow-
lines, the pump appeared to be operational it was decided to continue with the sampling
programme. The tool was set at 1733.2m for a gas sample. Almost immediately though the
‘short-stroke’ started again and after 22.5 litres was pumped out over 35 minutes it was
decided to bring the tool back to surface for maintenance.
MDT: Decent repeatability compared to pressures acquired during Run 2C. The LFA
response was clear but no clean-up forecast was available because the software can not model
accurately in water-based muds.
The tank closing pressures recorded by Schlumberger were all verified back at surface by Oil
Phase. All indications at rig-site were that six pressurised oil samples had been obtained.
TEMP: Three thermometers were run in the logging head all three giving readings of 76˚C.
7.5. RUN 2E VSI-GR
The VSI check-shot survey was witnessed by Martin Ellis of RPS. Details of the log quality
can be found in the report submitted by Martin Ellis to Petro-Canada.
The decision to run the VSI at this stage in the operation instead of continuing with the MDT
sampling programme was made for a number of reasons. The VSI Engineer needed to return
to the UK as soon as possible due to urgent personal reasons which had only become apparent
earlier that day. It was unknown when a replacement VSI Engineer would become available.
Also, Marco Zeegers, who was covering the MDT maintenance, had indicated that having
additional time to complete the maintenance of the MDT off the critical path was preferable.
The VSI was brought forward in the logging programme to allow the VSI Engineer to leave
the rig on 15th April and to allow time for the MDT repairs and redressing of the tanks.

CONFIDENTIAL
TEMP: Three thermometers were run in the logging head all three giving readings of 76˚C.
7.6. RUN 2F MDT-GR Samples
Despite bringing the VSI forward in the programme to allow more time to complete the MDT
maintenance there was still a 2 ½ hour wait in between runs before the MDT was being rigged
up again. The SPMC tanks had all been removed and the MDT was dressed with 12 x MPSR
tanks.
The programme had changed slightly, now there were to be 4 x MPSR samples taken at a
single gas point and a further 4 x MPSR tanks taken over two water points. All sampling was
to be completed with the Quick-Silver probe. The Standard Probe was still run as a
contingency.
The tool was positioned back at 1733.2m and after initially starting the clean-up with a single
pump the second pump was soon initiated and the flow split between the ‘guard’ and ‘sample’
lines. Even with both pumps operating the pressure was only drawn down approximately 1
Bar below formation pressure. Only the fluid being pumped through the sample line could be
monitored as only one LFA was present in the tool configuration. Very soon a good gas
response was seen and sampling began after pumping 134.5 litres over 1 hour 23 minutes.
Two samples were taken into the bottom MRMS (173) tank carrier successfully.
When sampling was attempted in the top MRMS (93) tank carrier it was found that the
sample could not be over-pressured. This could be due to a tank valve failure or a MRMS
seal-valve failure. A second sample was attempted and the same scenario occurred meaning
that it was the seal-valve on the MRMS (93) tank carrier that was unable to hold the
pressurised gas. Following discussions with Mike Eynon of Petro-Canada a further two
MPSR samples of gas were taken in the good MRMS tank carrier (173), resulting in a total of
six gas samples. A total of 288 litres was pumped over 3 hours 45 minutes at this depth.
Once the probe had been retracted the gas was flushed from the sample-lines and the faulty
seal-valve was closed to check its status. It was found that the seal valve was able to hold
against the pressurised drilling fluid so it was deemed likely that the faulty seal valve would
still allow for the water samples to be over-pressured.
The Volpreihausen water sample was then taken at 1797.5m. The Quick-Silver pumps were
quickly initiated which resulted in a 3 Bar draw-down. It was uncertain if the LFA would be
able to differentiate between water-based mud filtrate and formation water on resistivity
readings alone so the tool had been configured with a pH detector and furnished with a 1
gallon chamber of pH dye. The pH dye is injected into the sample flow line at regular
intervals by the Engineer to give a momentary pH reading, this is noted and monitored for
stability to show clean-up has been achieved. Initial attempts to obtain an early ‘base-line’ pH
reading were unsuccessful, probably because the LFA requires a translucent fluid to correctly
obtain a pH value. The early flow through the LFA was probably full of solids making
readings impossible. The first valid pH reading was made after 50 minutes of pumping; a
value of 6.0 was obtained, this compares to a mud value of 9.4 as provided by the Mud
Engineer.

CONFIDENTIAL
A further eight pH readings were taken over the 30 minutes of pumping, seeing the pH value
steadily decline and then stabilise at 5.9. The resistivity value had also stabilised at 0.024Ωm,
this had steadily risen from a value of 0.014Ωm at the start of the clean-up, this data matches
well with the 0.041 Ωm mud filtrate reading taken at surface temperatures. All indications
were that after 118 litres had been pumped over 2 hours 10 minutes a flow of clean formation
water had been achieved. Two MPSR samples were taken, as expected the samples were
successfully over-pressured, one in each MRMS tank carrier. A total of 124 litres was
pumped at this depth.
The tool was then positioned at 1871.4m to take a water sample in the Hewett formation.
Quick-Silver was used successfully and the pH monitoring was also utilised. This time an
earlier pH value was obtained, the fluid had a pH of 6.3 after 15 minutes. Further readings
across the pumping interval saw the pH value stabilise at 5.88, the resistivity again stabilised
at 0.024Ωm. Both samples were taken in the top MRMS (93) tank carrier due to uncertainty
surrounding the status of the final tank in the bottom MRMS (173) that had been run in hole
during Run 2D. Sampling began after 81 litres was pumped over 75 minutes, in total 101
litres was pumped at this depth.
It was considered prudent to perform a wiper-trip after this run in consideration of the amount
of formation fluids that have been pumped into the borehole.
MDT: Both resistivity and pH responses gave confidence that clean samples had been
obtained.
78˚C.
7.7. RUN 2G MSCT-GR
Petro-Canada had selected 50 cores across the whole open-hole interval, there was no
particular importance placed on core retrieval from any one particular formation. Some of the
core points were very close together (~1m) so it was decided to complete the coring
programme in three sweeps of the open-hole section. This had the advantage of giving enough
space between each core point to ensure the tool was moving and to check that it was still on
depth, it also meant that if the tool failed there was more chance having cores that spanned the
open-hole interval.
The MSCT was run directly after a wiper trip. Up to this point in the job there had been no
problems running tools in and out of the well, there was no reason to consider running a hole-
finder. The first attempt to deploy the MSCT was unsuccessful though, it hung up at an
approximate depth of 1708m. Multiple attempts to deploy the tool past this depth failed so the
tool was pulled back to surface and a hole-finder installed. With the hole-finder installed the
tool was able to pass the hang-up point on the second attempt.

CONFIDENTIAL
After completing the 6th core in the programme it was noticed that the bit mechanism was not
rotating fully to the ‘eject’ position. The bit mechanism drills cores in a horizontal orientation
and then rotates to a vertical orientation when back inside the tool body to allow a rod to push
the core into the core barrel. If the mechanism does not rotate fully back to vertical the push-
rod is unable to remove the core from the bit. The same was noticed whilst drilling the 7th
core so it was decided to pull the tool back to surface.
With the tool back at surface it was seen that there was a lot of debris formed from rock chips
and mud accumulated around the bit mechanism. This was cleared away and as an additional
precaution two springs were removed from the bit mechanism to allow the mechanism to
rotate more freely. The springs that were removed have been a recent addition to the design to
the MSCT.
The tool was run back in hole and the coring programme completed. There was evidence that
the bit mechanism was once again struggling to return to the ‘eject’ position during the last 10
to 15 cores but the MSCT Specialist managed to ‘nurse’ the tool through.
DEPTH CONTROL: Good agreement with Run 2A
MSCT: The recovery rate was 40 cores from 51 attempted. Exactly 80% of the programmed
cores were recovered, the majority of which were full length of in good condition.
TEMP: Three thermometers were run in the logging head giving readings of 76˚C & 76˚C, the
thirds thermometer was broken.
7.8. RUN 2H CBL-CCL-GR
The CBL was logged to ascertain the position of the top of cement behind the 9 5/8” casing. It
had been expected to find the top of cement at a depth range of 500m to 700m so the
programme had stated to log from approximately 1000m until free pipe was found.
The CBL was logged while running in from 500m at a speed of 3600 ft/hr. No definite cement
was seen on the log response until the tool was past 900m so it was decided to run the tool
deeper to ensure enough data was acquired. The tool was eventually run down to 1400m to
ensure a good correlation could be made for depth control. Data was acquired from 1418m up
until 500m at a speed of 3600 ft/hr. A repeat pass was also made from 100m to 815m.
CBL: The CBL data was of good quality and repeatability. The Free Pipe Attenuation was
~52mV which is the expected value for this 9 5/8” casing. The log showed intervals of very
good cement from 1335m to 1355m and 1312m to 1321m. The rest of the cement is of
variable quality. From the CBL response it appears that the top of cement of reasonable bond

CONFIDENTIAL
quality is at 933m. The Schlumberger CBL Product Domain Champion for North Sea
Operations reviewed the data; his interpretation included the following remark:
“I have looked at the data and I still think there is a clear TOC around 795 m. The log above
795 m looks like a typical example of a free pipe, I don't think this would be a micro-annulus
effect, however without the benefit of a second pass under pressure we could not really tell
100%.
Parameters all seem to be correct; in summary I don't see anything wrong with it. The tool
appears to repeat quite well also.
It would be good to get the cement type and impedance and probably adjust the ZCMT value
from 6.8 (default) to the actually value, however I don't think this would really improve much
the CBL amplitudes over the free pipe section.”
CCL: The CCL response was clear across the whole interval. The collar spacing was found to
be ~13m which matches the casing geometry.
TEMP: Three thermometers were run in the logging head but had not been spun down from
Run 2G hence no maximum temperature can be reported for this run.

CONFIDENTIAL
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1. Summary
The 8 ½” logging on well P11-06 was a safe and successful logging job.
• Highlights included:
o Determination of the pressure gradients present and the identification of the
fluid contacts.
o The performance of Quick-silver during the gas & water sampling
o Good petrophysical data obtained.
o The flexibility and adaptability of the Schlumberger personnel to deal with the
demands of a changing logging schedule.
o An 80% recovery of the rotary SWCs provided adequate coverage of all zones
of interest.
o Obtaining quality water samples (to be determined after analysis)
• Lowlights included:
o The inability to use the Quick-Silver full capability during the clean-up prior to
oil sampling.
o Confusion over the MDT specialist role. The Schlumberger crews were under
the impression that a dedicated MDT Specialist would arrive on the rig on 13th
April. This was not the case so Marco Zeegers, the night shift Crew-Chief also
had to cover the MDT maintenance work.
o Unit 480 is not yet modified to allow more than 8,000 lbs to be pulled by the
winch. Not being able to pull the SWL of the logging cable increase the
chances of getting tools stuck.
o The second Logging Crew and majority of logging tools only arrived on the rig
a matter of hours before the job began.
These service quality issues are outlined in Appendix 9.8.
8.2. Recommendations
8.2.1. Logistics & Equipment:
o Unit 480 needs to have the high tension modification work completed as soon
as possible to allow the full SWL of the wire-line to be pulled.
8.2.2. Technical:
o Investigate the cause of the discrepancy in the gauge readings while running in
hole for Run 2C.
o Investigate the cause of the failure of the MRPS to open during Run 2C. The
Engineer did manage to get the tool operational again by cycling the solenoids
while the tool was down-hole. The likely cause of this malfunction is that
debris bluffed the solenoids which then consequently cleared down-hole so a
definitive answer may not be found.

CONFIDENTIAL
o For future jobs with similar mobilities it should be ensured that the Quick-
Silver is configured with an Extra High Pressure Displacement Unit above the
probe and a High Pressure Displacement Unit below the probe. This would
allow for slower pumping that may enable the both pumps to be used
simultaneously resulting in a quicker, better clean up for the oil samples. The
down side to this is that pumping would be slower in the highly mobile water
and gas formations.
o Investigate the cause of the Seal-Valve failure in MRMS 93 during the gas
sampling.
o Investigate the cause of the pump-out unit ‘short-stroking’ during the oil and
gas sampling during Run 2D.
o It should be noted that there was uncertainty over one of the MPSR tanks used
during Run 2F. It was decided not to sample into MPSR 3343 as the valve may
have opened during Run 2C, the status of the tank was uncertain. This was
probably the Engineer being over cautious because there were other tanks
available and there was no absolute necessity to utilise this tank.
o Investigate why the FMI callipers were out of tolerance during the casing
check after logging Run 2B. The calliper readings were 9.05” & 9.30” inside
8.681” ID casing.
o The data products such as LAS, PDS and composite logs were slow in being
provided and the LAS files had to be corrected a number of times, e.g.
wrapped data in LAS files. The programme was very specific in the
requirements so there should have been no confusion. Although it should be
noted that the lack of preparation time that was afforded to the crews before
this job may have been a factor.
o Thermometers need to be spun down before every run, no matter if the
temperature on subsequent runs is expected to be higher. Borehole temperature
is vital data and needs to be recorded accurately.
8.2.3. Personnel:
o An explanation should be provided to Petro-Canada over the confusion of who

was to cover the MDT Specialist role. It is not ideal having a Crew Chief
covering the MDT work as well due to him being restricted by the day/night
shift pattern. Had Marco Zeegers known from the outset that he would be
covering the MDT Specialist role better preparations would have been made.
This issue definitely cost 2 ½ hours when MDT maintenance work was still
going on at the completion of the VSI, it also made it necessary to run an
additional MDT Pressure only pass due to the MPSR tanks not being installed.
o MDT sampling jobs should have two Engineers assigned that are fully
competent to cover their shifts. At no point during the job did Javier complete
any sampling which meant Vlad worked very long hours. Whether Javier is
competent at MDT sampling or not is unknown but it is not acceptable to have
one Engineer covering a job that had at least 12 samples planned.
o The Petro-Canada Drilling Supervisor and Well Site Geologist mentioned that
they felt that the Schlumberger crew could have been more courteous. These
issues fall outside the scope of this report, but Schlumberger should try to
ensure good customer relations on future jobs.

CONFIDENTIAL
9. Appendices
9.1. Well Sketch (not to scale)
WATER DEPTH = 34m

Van Ghent Prospect MSL 40.0 m below R.T.
P11-06
GSF Labrador
April 12th 2008
9 5/8" CASING SHOE 1703 m
Volpriehausen
max O.H. devi 1.24deg @ 1771.6 m
1800 m
TD 8 1/2" HOLE 1892 m

CONFIDENTIAL
9.2. Bottom Hole Temperature
The table below gives the bottom-hole temperatures from all three runs along with the depths
and times of measurement. The temperatures from Run 2A is from the maximum reading
thermometers installed in the cable-head, the Run 2C and 2F temperatures are from the MDT
Quartz Gauge. The temperature has been extrapolated using a Horner plot to give the results
below.
Extrapolated bottom hole temperature is 77.86°C.
Client Petro-Canada Netherlands BV Bottomhole Temperature Calculation
Well P11-06
Date Time v
1.4 start time depth
100.0 y = 37.306Ln(x) + 77.859
TCS 12/04/08 12:20 39550.51 1883.6
TLS 2.3 ∆t 90.0
Date Time, t BHT Depth TVD Run elapsed time depth used temp grad temp at depth tvd md
80.0
Run 1 12/04/08 22:00 69.0 1852.0 1851.6 2A 39550.92 1851.60 0.03726507 70.2 -0.209254439 1851.6 1852.0
Bottomhole Temperature
Run 2 13/04/08 20:30 74.7 1884.0 1883.6 2C 70.0

39551.85 1883.59 0.03965831 74.7 -0.067610223 1883.6 1884.0
Run 3 15/04/08 20:00 76.8 1871.4 1871.0 2F 39553.83 1870.99 0.04104779 77.3 -0.027851207 1871.0 1871.4
60.0
Run 4 0.0
Run 5 50.0 0.0
Run 6 0.0
40.0
30.0
FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE
Dimensionless Time
20.0
0.811 9.66666667 0.81118881
0.935 1884.0 <-- Depth m 10.0
32.1666667 0.9346247
0.973 1843.6 <-- TVDSS m 79.6666667 0.97253306
0.0
37.3 77.9 <-- Temperature °C
0.500 0.600 0.700 0.800 0.900 1.000
Dimensionless Time = ∆t/(t + ∆t)

CONFIDENTIAL
9.3. Toolstring configurations

9.3.1. Run 2A DSI-HRLA-TLD-CAL-MCFL-CNL-HNGS-SP 3
3
ECRD was run in this tool configuration

CONFIDENTIAL
9.3.2. Run 2B FMI-GPIT 4
4

CONFIDENTIAL
9.3.3. Run 2C MDT-GR Pressures 5
5

CONFIDENTIAL
9.3.4. Run 2D MDT-GR Samples
6
6

CONFIDENTIAL
9.3.5. Run 2E VSI-GR

CONFIDENTIAL
9.3.6. Run 2F MDT-GR Samples 7
7

CONFIDENTIAL
9.3.7. Run 2G MSCT-GR

CONFIDENTIAL
9.3.8. Run 2H CBL-CCL-GR

CONFIDENTIAL
9.4. Operations Timing (Run Summary & detailed Breakdown)
9.4.1. Run 2A DSI-HRLA-TLD-MCFLCAL-CNL-HNGS-SP
Well : Van Ghent (P11-06) Run Number : 2A
Petro-Canada Netherlands
To : Attention of : Mike Eynon
BV
Rig : GSF Labrador Logging Company : Schlumberger
Geologist : Henk van Gastel Engineers: Javier Espinosa / Vladimir Mukhin
Witness: Ian Barwick
Date : 12-Apr-2008 Tool String : DSI-HRLA-TLD-CNL-MCFL-HNGS-SP
Latitude : 52° 21’ 46.964” N Grid : 5,801,617.91m N
Longitude : 03° 24’ 27.645” E Grid : 527,761.71m E
Permanent Datum : M.S.L. Elevation : 0m
Drilling Datum : Drill Floor (MDBRT) Elevation : 40m above M.S.L.
Mud Type : Salt / Polymer pH : 9.4
Mud Density : 1.22 s.g. Oil / Water: -/88
Fluid Loss : 3.4 cc Chlorides : 172,000 mg/L (whole mud)
Viscosity : 41 sec/qt, 13 cP Solids : 1.9% by Volume (corrected)
Hole Size : 8 ½” Casing Size : 9.625” at 1703 m, 8.681” i.d.
KOP : n.a. Max Hole Angle @ Depth : 1.24 deg at 1771.6m (open hole)
Hole Condition : Good Tight Spots / Dog Legs : n.a.
TD Driller : 1892.0 m 9 5/8” Casing Driller : 1703.0 m
TD Logger : 1892.5 m 9 5/8” Casing Logger : 1703.0 m
Date TD Reached : 12-Apr-2008 Last Circulation Stopped : 12:20 hrs 12-Apr-08
Time TD Reached : 10:05 Last Circulation Time : 2 hr 15 mins 12-Apr-08
Max Rec Temperatures : 69˚C Time Since Last Circulation Stopped : 9hrs and 40 mins
Rm 0.045 Ωm @ 10°C
Rmf 0.041 Ωm @ 10°C
Rmc 0.061 Ωm @ 10°C
Main Log: 1455m to 1892.5m (GR logged well into CSG to allow correlation to Run
Interval Logged :
1A)
Log Speed : 1800 ft/hr and high resolution.
Interval of Repeat : Repeat Section: 1840 m – 1703 m (extended to cover entire Volpriehausen
Total Time
Operation Summary : (See Time Breakdown Report for more detail) From To
(hrs:mins)
Rig up DSI-HRLA-TLD-CAL-CNL-HNGS-SP-ECRD 18:00 20:50 2:50
RIH to TD, logging down from 9 5/8” Shoe 20:50 22:00 1:10
Log Main Pass 22:00 22:50 0:50
Log Repeat Section 22:50 23:20 0:30
POOH, at surface, perform after calibrations and rig down (13th April) 23:20 02:45 03:25
1. Hole condition was good

2. SP showed some character but is not very responsive
3. Hole Volume from PEX single arm Calliper = 7.36 Cubic Metres
4. Calliper check read 8.49” inside 8.681” ID CSG. Data was shifted +0.2”
5. Thermometers read 69˚C & 69˚C (third thermometer was broken)
Total operating time = 08:45, Wireline Operating time =08:45 lost time = 00:00 Eff’y = 100%
Additional Comments : All reported hole and cement volumes from 1891.9m to 1703m (CSG)

CONFIDENTIAL
Reported by : Ian Barwick / Henk van Gastel
Detailed Time Breakdown for Run 2A:
Time Durn Action

th
12 April Second Crew and Gaia Log QC arrived on GSF Labrador at 15:30. First
SLB had been on board since 12 ¼” logging. Most of the logging tools
did not arrive on board rig until 13:00 though so limited tool checks had
been completed.
12th April
18:00 00:30 Rig is ready for wireline operations. Schlumberger begin to lift tools to
cat-walk. Some crew members are waiting for bags to arrive. Rig crew
attach sheaves to top block.
18:30 01:10 Rig up tools
19:40 00:10 Pick sheaves and wireline
19:50 00:15 Tool-Box talk with rig crew before installing radioactive sources
20:05 00:25 Tool checks at surface
20:30 00:20 Zero tool-string (40.44m). Pick up tools to install radioactive sources.
Tool weight at surface = 2180lbs. Install sources
20:50 00:10 Run in hole to 200m, measure rig-up length. L1 = 90.1m
21:00 00:30 Run in hole to 1550m
21:30 00:10 Check rig-up length. L2 = 90.12m. Tension at 1550m = 3450 lbs
21:40 00:20 Log down from 1680m @ 3000 fph down to 1870m
22:00 00:50 Main pass logged at 1800 fph from TD to 1455m
22:50 00:10 Run back in hole for repeat pass
23:00 00:20 Repeat pass at 1800 fph from 1850m to CSG
23:20 00:40 Pull out of hole
13th April
01:05 00:15 Remove radioactive sources
01:20 00:20 Perform after log verifications
01:40 01:05 Rig down tools
02:45 End of Run 2A (HRLA-TLD-CNL-HNGS-DSI-SP)
Total Operating time: 08:45
Drilling related non productive time: 00:00
Wireline non productive time: 00:00
Wireline operating time: 08:45
Wireline Lost Time: 00:00
LT/OT = 0% Efficiency = 100%

CONFIDENTIAL
9.4.2. Run 2B FMI-GPIT-GR
Well : Van Ghent (P11-06) Run Number : 2B

Petro-Canada Netherlands
To : Attention of : Mike Eynon
BV
Date : 13-Apr-2008 Tool String : FMI-GPIT-GR
Max Rec Temperatures : 73˚C Time Since Last Circulation Stopped : 15hrs and 10 mins
Rm 0.045 Ωm @ 10°C
Rmf 0.041 Ωm @ 10°C
Rmc 0.061 Ωm @ 10°C
Interval Logged : Main Log: 1695m to TD
Log Speed : 1600 ft/hr
Interval of Repeat : Re-logged whole section twice more
Total Time
(hrs:mins)
Rig up FMI-GPIT-GR-ECRD 02:45 03:15 0:30
RIH to TD, logging down from 9 5/8” Shoe 03:15 04:30 1:15
Log Main Pass 04:30 05:00 0:30
Log Repeat Section 05:00 05:45 0:45
Process data. Log section a third time with less pad force 05:40 07:10 1:30
POOH, at surface, perform after calibrations and rig down (13th April) 07:10 08:30 1:20

7. Either pad contact was poor in places or there was stick & pull evident if pad force was increased. Three
passes were made a different pad forces to hopefully enable a complete data set to be processed.
8. Hole Volume from FMI four arm Calliper = 6.99 Cubic Metres
9. Cement Volume calculated for 7” liner from the four arm FMI calliper = 2.29 Cubic Metres
10. Calliper check read 9.05” & 9.30” inside 8.681” ID CSG. Data was shifted accordingly.
11. Thermometers read 73˚C, 73˚C & 72˚C
Additional Comments : All reported hole and cement volumes from 1892.0m to 1703m (CSG)

CONFIDENTIAL
Detailed Time Breakdown for Run 2B:
02:45 00:15 Rig up tools for Run 2B (FMI-GPIT-GR-ECRD)

03:00 00:15 Surface checks
03:15 01:15 Run in hole to TD
04:30 00:30 Log main pass at 1600 fph from TD to 1695m
05:00 00:10 Run back to TD, re-log whole interval
05:10 00:35 Log repeat pass at 1600 fph from TD to 1695m
05:45 00:45 Processing image before pulling out of hole
06:30 00:10 Decide to run back and log the interval again in an attempt to obtain less
stick & pull
06:40 00:30 Log third pass with less pad force
07:10 00:50 Pull out of hole at speeds of 6500 – 8000 fph
08:00 00:15 After log verifications
08:15 00:15 Rig down Run 2B
08:30 End of Run 2B (FMI-GPIT-GR)
9.4.3. Run 2C MDT-GR Pressures

Well : P11-06 Run Number : 2C
To : Petro-Canada Netherlands BV Attention of : Mike Eynon
Date : 13-Apr-2008 Tool String : MDT-GR-ECRD
Max Rec Temperatures : 74.7˚C Time Since Last Circulation Stopped : 26hrs and 10 mins

CONFIDENTIAL
Rm 0.045 Ωm @ 10°C
Rmf 0.041 Ωm @ 10°C
Rmc 0.061 Ωm @ 10°C
Interval Logged : Top Pressure point = 1708m, Bottom pressure point = 1884m
Log Speed : n/a
Interval of Repeat : Pressure point at 1733.2m repeated for QC purposes
Total Time
(hrs:mins)
Rig up MDT-GR-ECRD 09:30 10:20 00:50
Checking tools at surface 10:20 11:10 00:50
RIH toolstring to 1200m 11:10 12:00 00:50
PS and PQ reading different, POOH and flush gauges 12:00 12:20 00:20
RIH to 1695m 12:20 12:40 00:20
Wait for temp/pressure gauges to stabilize 12:40 13:55 01:15
RIH, correlate and position at first depth 13:55 14:25 00:30
Pressure survey as per programme 14:25 17:00 02:35
Problems with MDT at 1758.3m 17:00 17:30 00:30
Tool working again, continue pressure survey 17:30 20:30 03:00
Log GR from 1885m to CSG 20:30 20:50 00:20
Perform repeat pressure at 1733.2m and four additional points 20:50 22:15 00:20
Pull out of hole 22:15 23:50 01:35
Perform after log verifications and rig down Run 2C 23:50 00:30 00:40

13. When running in hole it was noticed that the strain and quartz gauge were reading different values. The tools
were pulled back to surface and the gauges flushed with silicon oil.
14. While attempting the pressure point at 1758.3m the probe failed to open. The tool was pulled back in side
casing and the solenoid valves were cycled numerous times. Eventually the tool started operating correctly
again.
15. In total the MDT was set 28 times (although only 27 of these were requested, one point was taken by
mistake). There were 26 good pressures obtained, 2 points were tight.
16. Thermometers read 74˚C, 75˚C & 75˚C
Total operating time = 16:00, Wireline Operating time =16:00 lost time = 01:10 Eff’y = 92.7%
Additional Comments:
Since the Oilphase engineers were not on board and the MDT engineer had not had the time to prepare the sampling
chambers in advance, it was decided to make up the tool string with a single probe only, just for taking formation
pressures.
Detailed Time Breakdown for Run 2C:
08:30 1:00 Wait for a decision on tool configuration

09:30 00:50 Rig up Run 2C
10:20 01:00 Check tools at surface & complete before log verifications
11:20 00:40 Run in hole to 1200m
12:00 00:20 At 1200m notice difference in gauge readings, pull back to surface and
flush gauges with silicon oil
12:20 00:20 Run in hole to Casing shoe
12:40 01:10 Tool stabilisation at casing shoe
13:50 00:30 Correlation passes
14:20 01:55 Complete first 10 pressure points
16:15 00:25 Correlation pass from 1815 to 1740m (on depth)
16:40 00:20 Pressure point at 1755.2m
17:00 00:30 Set tool at 1758.3m, problems with MDT

CONFIDENTIAL
17:30 02:05 Tool working again, continue pressure survey
19:35 00:10 GR correlation (0.3m shallow)
19:45 00:45 Complete original pressure survey.
20:30 00:20 Log GR from 1885m to CSG
20:50 00:20 Perform repeat pressure at 1733.2m for Log QC purposes
21:20 00:55 Complete additional 4 pressure points to try and define contacts
22:15 00:45 Pull to casing shoe, await confirmation that pressure survey has finished
23:00 00:50 Confirmed that no more pressure points are needed. Pull out of hole
23:50 00:10 Perform after log verifications
14th April
00:00 00:05 Complete after log verifications
00:05 00:25 Rig down Run 2C
00:30 End of Run 2C (MDT-GR Pressures)
LT/OT = 7.7% Efficiency = 92.3%

Well : P11-06 Run Number : 2D
MDT-GR-ECRD Samples with
Date : 14-Apr-2008 Tool String :
QuickSilver Probe
Rm 0.045 Ωm @ 10°C
Rmf 0.041 Ωm @ 10°C
Rmc 0.061 Ωm @ 10°C
Interval Logged : Sample points at 1755.2m & 1754.5m
Log Speed : n/a

CONFIDENTIAL
Interval of Repeat : n/a
Total Time
(hrs:mins)
Reconfigure MDT for sampling 00:30 02:30 02:00
Surface checks. Zero at C/H (34.3m), weight at surface = 2780 lbs 02:30 03:40 01:10
Run in hole to 200m and complete further tool checks 03:40 04:10 00:30
Run in hole to casing shoe 04:10 04:35 00:25
Stabilise gauges at casing shoe 04:35 05:05 00:30
Run in hole, correlate and position at first sample point 05:05 05:45 00:40
At 1751.8m gas is flowing. Abandon point. 05:45 06:50 01:05
Attempt at various depth. Lost seals, tight points and tool plugging. 06:50 09:25 02:35
Set tool at 1755.2m. Take two SPMC samples 09:25 13:30 04:05
Attempt at various depth. Lost seals, tight points and tool plugging. 13:30 15:25 01:55
Set tool at 1754.5m. Take four SPMC samples 15:25 20:35 05:10
Drop down off 1754.5m, no sticking observed. Run in hole to 1840m 20:35 20:40 00:05
Set PS at 1733.2m. Pump is ‘short-stroking’. Abandon after 22.3 litres 20:40 22:00 01:20
Pull out of hole 22:00 23:25 01:25
Back at surface. Rig down MDT 23:25 01:00 01:20

18. Samples were taken at 1755.2m (2 x spmc) and 1754.5m (4 x spmc)
19. The MDT was set at the following depth but samples not taken;
1751.8m – attempted oil point but gas was flowing, 25.5 litres was pumped.
1755.2m – lost seal after 2.5 litres pumped
1755.15m – lost seal after 6 litres pumped
1754.7m – tight
1758.3m – tight
1756m – tight
1755m – plugged tool
1758.3m – tight
1755m – tight
1755.2m – tight
1754.7m – tight
1733.2m – tool pump problems after pumping a total of 22.3 litres
20. A total of 47.8 litres of gas was pumped to the borehole
21. A total of 184.5 litres of formation fluids (oil & water) was pumped to the borehole.
22. The quick-silver pump was not used for the oil samples. If both pumps were operated the drawdown on the
tight formation was excessive to allow for quality sampling
23. The pump started to ‘short-stroke’ during the sampling at 1754.5m Schlumberger recommended to take the
samples despite the clean-up not being ideal.
24. The pump continued to deteriorate during pumping at the gas point at 1733.2m. It was decided to pull the tool
to surface and service the pump.
25. Thermometer readings = 73˚C ,74˚C & 74˚C
Total operating time = 24:30, Wireline Operating time =24:30 lost time = tbd Eff’y = tbd%
It was decided to lay down the MDT and run the VSI after tool problems were experienced with the MDT. This
decision was based on the necessity of the VSI engineer having to leave the rig urgently due to personal reasons.
Detailed Time Breakdown for Run 2D:
00:30 02:00 Reconfigure MDT for sampling

02:30 01:10 Surface checks. Zero at C/H (34.3m), weight at surface = 2780 lbs

CONFIDENTIAL
03:40 00:30 Run in hole to 200m and complete further tool checks
04:10 00:25 Run in hole to casing shoe
04:35 00:30 Stabilise gauges at casing shoe
05:05 00:10 Run in hole to 1820m
05:15 00:15 Correlation pass from 1820m to 1690m (0.2m shallow)
05:30 00:15 Drop down to 1830m and log up to first sample station.
05:45 00:10 Take pre-test at 1751.8m. FP= 175.366 , Mob = 22.0, Temp = 70.9,
HB=215.15 (Pumping file #105)
05:55 00:55 Start pumping out. Gas levels are high. 12 Bar drawdown. Discuss with
Mike Eynon in town. Stop pumping after 25.5 litres.
06:50 00:25 Correlate and reposition tool at 1755.2m
07:15 00:10 Take pre-test at 1755.2m. FP= 175.52 , Mob = 13.0, Temp = 72.0,
07:25 00:10 Pump out 2.5 litres before seal is lost
07:35 00:10 Attempt to re-seat tool, unable to regain seal
07:45 00:05 Reposition tool at 1755.15m
07:50 00:20 Pumping file #109. Pumped 6 litres before seal is lost
08:15 00:10 Pre-test at 1754.7m is tight (6md), decide to try elsewhere
08:35 00:10 Pre-test at 1758.3m is tight, decide to try elsewhere
08:40 00:05 Reposition tool at 1756m
08:45 00:05 Take pre-test at 1756m. FP= 175.67 , Mob = 10.0, Temp = 72.0,
08:50 00:10 Start pumping, formation is too tight. Decide to move elsewhere
09:00 00:10 Take pre-test at 1755.m. FP= 175.55 , Mob = 17.7, Temp = 72.0,
09:10 00:15 Stop pumping after 1.0 litre. Tool is plugged
09:30 02:17 Start pumping at 1755.22m (no pre-test), pump with single pump due to
low perm causing too high drawdown, pressure dropping below bubble
point. (file #116).
11:47 00:05 Fill SPMC bottle #6 (585) after pumping 23.5 litres
11:52 1:06 Pump an additional 11.3 litres in between samples
12:58 00:05 Fill SPMC bottle #2 (149) after pumping 34.8 litres
13:03 00:17 Initiate Quick-silver pumps again, still very large drawdown
13:20 00:10 Take after sample pre-test. FP=175.44, Temp=72.7, Mob=2.5md,
HA=215.45
13:30 00:20 Correlating for station 1758.3m
13:50 00:10 Pretest @ 1758.3m, HB=215.79 (PQ), FP=175.73, Mob=5.3, Temp 73.3
(file #119)
14:00 00:10 Reposition tool at 1755.1 (file #120) and take pretest: HB 215.396,
FP=175.579, mob 4.6, T=73
14:10 00:15 Position at 1755.0m, 2nd test HB=215.381, FP=175.517, mob=10.0,
T=72.8 (file #121)
14:25 00:07 Start pumping with quicksilver, huge drawdown PQ=50, abort
14:32 00:23 Position at 1755.21m, tight
14:55 00:30 Position at 1754.7, mob 4.7
15:25 00:15 Position at 1754.5m, HB=215.29, FP=175.47, mob=23.5, T=72.7
15:40 00:10 Start pumping, lost seal
15:50 00:05 Set probe again, pretest FP=175.47, T=72.6
15:55 01:35 Start pumping (File #126) with quicksilver, tool plugged
17:30 00:15 Retract probe, flush tool
17:45 01:55 Set Probe, start pumping (1 pump), pump clogged up for 5 mins

CONFIDENTIAL
19:40 00:10 Fill bottle MS2#6 (090) total volume pumped 128,2 litres
19:50 00:10 Fill bottle MS2#2 (047), total volume pumped 133.3 litres
20:00 00:05 Fill bottle MS1#3 (510), total volume pumped 137.5 litres
20:05 00:05 Fill bottle MS2 #3 (075), Total volume pumped 141.3 litres, stopped
pumping.
20:10 00:25 Complete after sample checks (pre-test?)
20:35 00:05 Drop down off 1754.5m, no sticking observed. Run in hole to 1840m
20:40 00:30 Correlation passes, position Standard Probe at 1733.2m (1738.5m)
21:10 00:15 Set single probe at 1733.2m. Pre-test, FP=175.02, Mob=363mD,
HB=212.6, (file 132)
21:25 00:05 Start pump-out. Pump half-strokes after 8.3 litres.
21:30 00:15 Cycling pump valves in an attempt to clean them up.
21:45 00:15 Pump is working good again. Pump 14 litres before pump starts to ‘short-
stroke’ again. Decide to pull to surface and service pump.
23:25 00:35 Back at surface. Rig down MDT
15th April
00:00 01:00 Rig Down Run 2D
01:00 End of Run 2D (MDT-GR Samples)

Well : P11-06 Run Number : 2E
Geologist : Henk van Gastel Engineers: Kenny Gordon
Witness: Martin Ellis
Date : 15-Apr-2008 Tool String : VSI-GR

CONFIDENTIAL
Rm 0.045 Ωm @ 10°C
Rmf 0.041 Ωm @ 10°C
Rmc 0.061 Ωm @ 10°C
Interval Logged : Stations taken as per programme. Top station =571m, bottom station =1892m
Log Speed : n/a
Interval of Repeat : Check-shots taken at 77m & 1354m
Total Time
(hrs:mins)
Rig up Run 2E (VSI) 01:00 01:30 00:30
Run in hole and take first check-shot point at 77m 01:30 02:15 00:45
Run in hole and take next check-shot point at 1354m 02:15 02:40 00:25
Run in hole to TD and complete correlation pass 02:40 03:05 00:25
Pull out of hole taking Check-shot surveys 03:05 06:10 03:05
Rig down Run 2E 06:10 06:30 00:20

27. Thermometer readings = 76.0˚C , 76.0˚C & 76.0˚C
Martin Ellis of RPS witnessed the VSI check-shot and submitted a fully detailed report to Mike Eynon.
Detailed Time Breakdown for Run 2E:
01:00 00:30 Rig up Run 2E (VSI)

01:30 00:45 Run in hole and take first check-shot point at 77m
02:15 00:25 Run in hole and take next check-shot point at 1354m
02:40 00:25 Run in hole to TD and complete correlation pass
03:05 03:05 Pull out of hole taking Check-shot surveys
06:10 00:20 Rig down Run 2E
06:30 End of Run 2E (VSI-GR)

CONFIDENTIAL
9.4.6. Run 2F MDT-GR Samples
Well : P11-06 Run Number : 2F

MDT-GR-ECRD Samples with
Date : 15-Apr-2008 Tool String :
QuickSilver Probe
Rm 0.045 Ωm @ 10°C
Rmf 0.041 Ωm @ 10°C
Rmc 0.061 Ωm @ 10°C
Interval Logged : Sample points at 1733.2m, 1797.5m & 1871.4m
Log Speed : n/a
Total Time
(hrs:mins)
Rig is on stand-by while MDT servicing and tank installation is 06:30 09:00 02:30
completed
Start rigging up MDT using tugger line 09:00 10:30 01:30
Surface checks on MDT 10:30 11:00 00:30
Run in hole to casing shoe and stabilise gauges & correlation 11:00 12:30 01:30
Set tool at 1733.2m. Take 6 x MPSR samples of gas 12:30 15:45 03:45 (includes
00:45 LT)
Set tool at 1797.5m. Take 2 x MPSR samples of water 15:45 19:05 03:20
Set tool at 1871.4m. Take 2 x MPSR samples of water 19:05 21:40 02:35
Pull out of hole 21:40 22:20 00:40
Rig down MDT 22:20 00:15 01:55

CONFIDENTIAL
29. Samples were taken at 1733.2m (6 x mpsr), 1797.5m (2 x mpsr) and 1871.4m (2 x spmc)
30. A total of 288 litres of gas was pumped to the borehole
31. A total of 225 litres of formation water was pumped to the borehole.
32. The quick-silver pump was used at all sample points
33. pH dye was injected and used for monitoring clean up during the water sampling
34. The seal valve on MRMS #2 was not able to hold gas during the sampling at 1733.2m. Two additional MPSR
tanks were sampled at this depth in MRMS #1 to ensure the programmed objective of 4 samples was
achieved.
35. Thermometer readings = 76˚C, 76˚C & 78˚C
Detailed Time Breakdown for Run 2F:
06:30 02:30 Rig is on stand-by while MDT servicing and tank installation is completed
09:00 01:30 Start rigging up MDT using tugger line
10:30 00:30 Surface checks on MDT
11:00 00:40 Run in hole to casing shoe
11:40 00:20 Stabilisation of gauges at casing shoe
12:00 00:30 Correlation pass and position tool at 1733.2m
12:30 00:10 Pre-test at 1733.2m. HB=212.55, FP=175.10, Mob=461.7, Temp=71.0
12:40 00:05 Start pumping with single pump
12:45 01:18 Start second pump. Split flow. Quick-silver fully operational. Pump
14:03 00:04 Sample into MRMS #1, Bottle 3 (0155)
14:07 00:07 Continue pumping out in between samples
14:34 00:06 Sample into MRMS #2, Bottle 1 (3261). No indication of over-pressure.
Bottle valve may be faulty or MRMS seal valve.
14:54 00:07 Sample into MRMS #2, Bottle 5 (0153). No indication of over-pressure.
MRMS seal valve is faulty.
15:23 00:07 Pressure test after sampling. FP=175.12, Temp=71.9, HA=211.99
15:30 00:15 Flush out gas from displacement pumps and flow-lines
15:45 00:15 Drop off sample point. Correlate and reposition tool at 1797.5m
16:00 00:20 Pre-test at 1797.5m. HB=219.83, FP=179.40, Temp=73.9, Mob=203.2
16:20 00:35 Start pumping with a single pump. Attempt to get base-line for the pH
measurement. Unable to get computed pH value immediately. Pump 5.5
litres during this period.
16:55 00:10 Start Quick-silver pump, split flow.
17:05 01:26 Quick-silver pump with pH monitoring at regular intervals
18:50 00:15 Flush out displacement pumps and flow-lines
19:05 00:15 Drop off sample point. Correlate and reposition tool at 1871.4m

CONFIDENTIAL
19:20 00:15 Pre-test at 1871.45m. HB=228.91, FP=186.63, Temp=75.5, Mob=322.1
19:35 00:15 Pump with single pump for 3.5 litres, obtain pH of 6.3.
19:50 00:05 Start Quick-silver pump
19:55 00:10 Guard line is blocked. Need to retract and pump out to borehole after
pumping 5.8 litres
20:05 01:16 Re-set tool and start to pumps. Monitor pH regularly
22:20 01:40 Rig down MDT
16th April
00:00 00:15 Complete rig down
00:15 End of Run 2F (MDT-GR Samples)
Well : P11-06 Run Number : 2G

Geologist : Henk van Gastel Engineers: Rob Lagestee / Vladimir Mukhin
Date : 16-Apr-2008 Tool String : MSCR-GR
Rm 0.045 Ωm @ 10°C

CONFIDENTIAL
Rmf 0.041 Ωm @ 10°C
Rmc 0.061 Ωm @ 10°C
Interval Logged : As per Coring Programme. 50 core points from 1708m to 1878.6m
Log Speed : n/a
Total Time
(hrs:mins)
Rig up Run 2G – MSCT 11:00 11:45 00:45
Surface checks 11:45 12:00 00:15
Run in hole 12:00 12:40 00:40
Unable to pass casing shoe. Pull back to surface, install hole-finder. 12:40 14:40 02:00
Successfully pass HUD
Position tool at first core depth 14:40 15:00 00:20
Coring programme. 15:00 16:00 01:00
MSCT bit mechanism fails to rotate back fully Pull back to surface and 16:00 18:00 02:00
clear debris.
Continue coring programme until completion 18:00 00:00 06:00
Pull out of hole 00:00 00:45 00:45
Record core recovery and rig down MSCT 00:45 01:15 00:30
36. Hole condition was fair. Tool hung up just below casing shoe and had to be pulled back to surface to add a
hole-finder. A few other hang-up depths were noted during the first descent in hole
37. The MDT bit failed to return fully to the ‘eject’ position after Core 6 (1754.4m). This repeated after Core 7 as
well so tool was pulled back to surface. Some debris was cleared from the bit box mechanism and springs
were removed from the mechanism as well as an additional precautionary measure.
38. Core 6 (1754.4m) was lost and re-cored after the bit box was operational again
39. A total of 51 cores were attempted. There were 40 cores recovered
40. Missing cores are from the following depths:
1711.1m
1717.6m
1728.4m
1729.5m
1731.0m
1736.6m
1754.5m
1772.5m
1799.0m
1871.6m
41. Thermometer readings = 76.0˚C & 76.0˚C
Detailed Time Breakdown for Run 2G:
11:00 00:45 Rig up Run 2G – MSCT

11:45 00:15 Surface checks
12:00 00:35 Run in hole
12:35 00:05 Tool checks at 1500m
12:40 00:20 Continue to Run-in-hole. Unable to pass casing shoe after multiple
attempts.
13:00 00:25 Pull back to surface

CONFIDENTIAL
13:25 00:50 Install hole-finder and make second attempt.
14:15 00:25 Run in hole
14:40 00:05 Get past casing shoe at second attempt
14:45 00:15 Correlation pass. Depth shifted +0.3m
15:00 01:00 Begin coring programme. MSCT Bit Box does not fully rotate to ‘eject’
position after Core 6 (1757.4m). Another core is attempted, the same
happens. Decide to pull out of hole.
16:00 00:50 Pull back to surface
16:50 00:40 Recover 6 from 7 cores. Core 6 (1757.4m) is missing, being pushed out
of the bit by core 7. Core 7 is still in bit which is stuck in between ‘core’
and ‘eject’ position. Clear debris from around bit box and remove springs
from bit travelling assembly.
17:30 00:25 Run back in hole
17:55 00:05 Correlation pass. Depth shifted +0.1m)
18:00 00:45 Repeat Core 6 (1757.4m) and continue coring programme
18:45 00:10 Correlation pass after Core 12.
18:55 00:25 Continue coring programme until Core 16
19:20 00:10 Run in hole. Correlation pass.
19:30 00:15 Continue coring programme from Core 17 (1799m)
19:45 00:10 Correlation pass after Core 18, depth was 0.3m shallow
19:55 01:35 Continue coring programme from Core 19 (1772.5m) until Core 32
(1711.1m)
21:30 00:15 Run in hole. Correlation pass, shift depth +0.3m
21:45 02:15 Complete coring programme from Core 33 (1878.6m) to Core 50
(1708m)
17th April
00:45 00:30 Record core recovery and rig down MSCT
01:15 End of Run 2G (MSCT-GR)

CONFIDENTIAL
Well : P11-06 Run Number : 2H

Geologist : Henk van Gastel Engineers: Vladimir Mukhin
Date : 17-Apr-2008 Tool String : CBL-CCL-GR
Max Rec Temperatures : Not Taken Time Since Last Circulation Stopped : 20hrs and 30 mins
Rm 0.045 Ωm @ 10°C
Rmf 0.041 Ωm @ 10°C
Rmc 0.061 Ωm @ 10°C
Interval Logged : 494m to 1416m
Log Speed : 3600 fph
Interval of Repeat : 900m to 1000m
Total Time
(hrs:mins)
Rig up Run 2H CBL-CCL-GR 01:15 02:10 00:55
Surface checks & calibrations 02:10 02:40 00:30
Run in hole down to 1400m. 02:40 04:05 01:25
Log main pass from 1400m to 500m. Top of good cement at 933m. 04:05 05:00 00:55
Run in hole back to 1000m for repeat pass 05:00 05:15 00:15
Repeat pass from 1000m to 850m 05:15 05:30 00:15
Pull to surface 05:30 05:50 00:20
Rig down Run 2H. Complete rig down of sheaves. 05:50 06:30 00:40
42. Free Pipe Attenuation = 52mV. Fluid Compensation Factor set at 0.42
43. Top of cement showing reasonable bond is at 933m.
44. Log displayed free pipe characteristics from 785m upwards
45. Thermometer reading = 76°C, these thermometers can not have been spun down from the previous run

CONFIDENTIAL
Detailed Time Breakdown for Run 2H:
01:15 00:55 Rig up Run 2H CBL-CCL-GR

02:10 00:30 Surface checks & calibrations
02:40 01:25 Run in hole down to 1400m. It was necessary to go this deep to enable
correlation
04:05 00:55 Log main pass from 1400m to 500m. Top of good cement at 933m.
05:00 00:15 Run in hole back to 1000m for repeat pass
05:15 00:15 Repeat pass from 1000m to 850m
05:30 00:20 Pull to surface
05:50 00:40 Rig down Run 2H and complete rig down of all SL equipment.
06:30 End of Run 2H (CBL-CCL-GR)

CONFIDENTIAL
9.5. Log Headers
9.5.1. Run 2A DSI-HRLA-TLD-MCFL-CAL-CNL-HNGS-SP

CONFIDENTIAL
9.5.2. Run 2B FMI-GPIT

CONFIDENTIAL
9.5.3. Run 2C MDT-GR Pressures
Page Empty – Awaiting Header from Schlumberger

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL
9.5.6. Run 2F MDT-GR Samples

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL
9.6. MDT Summary
9.6.1. Formation Pressures table
Date: 13/04/2008 Client: Petro-Canada Netherlands BV Engineer: J.Espinosa / V.Mukhin
Rig: GSF Labrador Well: P11-06 v
2.4 Log QC: Ian Barwick / Henk van Gastel
Pressures (bara) Mobility Mobility

Depths (m) Times Hydrostatic Formation Hydrostatic Kdd FRA Temp DD
Test File MDBRT TVDBRT TVDSS Start Duration Finish Strain Quartz gm/cc Strain Quartz gm/cc Strain Quartz gm/cc Zone md mD/cP DegC cc Comments
x 1 61 1708.0 1707.6 1667.6 14:25 00:10 14:35 209.8 209.6 1.25 174.7 174.5 1.04 209.8 209.6 1.25 1 572.3 67.7 19.9 Good test
x 2 62 1713.0 1712.6 1672.6 14:38 00:09 14:47 210.4 210.2 1.25 174.8 174.6 1.04 210.4 210.2 1.25 1 437.2 67.5 19.3 Good test
x 3 63 1716.5 1716.1 1676.1 14:50 00:08 14:58 210.8 210.7 1.25 174.9 174.7 1.04 210.8 210.7 1.25 1 484.6 67.7 19.3 Good test
x 4 64 1719.5 1719.1 1679.1 15:01 00:07 15:08 211.2 211.0 1.25 174.9 174.7 1.04 211.2 211.0 1.25 1 132.1 67.9 19.4 Good test
x 5 65 1723.0 1722.6 1682.6 15:12 00:08 15:20 211.6 211.5 1.25 174.9 174.7 1.03 211.6 211.5 1.25 1 448.0 68.1 19.7 Good test
x 6 66 1728.0 1727.6 1687.6 15:23 00:10 15:33 212.2 212.1 1.25 175.0 174.8 1.03 212.2 212.1 1.25 1 106.0 68.4 19.1 Good test
x 7 67 1733.2 1732.8 1692.8 15:36 00:09 15:45 212.9 212.7 1.25 175.1 174.9 1.03 212.9 212.7 1.25 1 697.8 68.6 19.7 Good test
x 8 68 1742.5 1742.1 1702.1 15:49 00:09 15:58 214.0 213.8 1.25 175.2 175.0 1.02 214.0 213.8 1.25 1 35.1 68.9 19.6 Good test
x 9 69 1746.5 1746.1 1706.1 16:01 00:09 16:10 214.5 214.3 1.25 175.3 175.1 1.02 214.5 214.3 1.25 1 7.6 69.3 19.9 Good test
x 10 70 1751.0 1750.6 1710.6 16:13 00:12 16:25 215.0 214.9 1.25 175.3 175.2 1.02 215.0 215.9 1.26 1 14.2 69.6 19.3 Good test
x 11 72 1755.2 1754.8 1714.8 16:45 00:08 16:53 215.5 215.4 1.25 175.6 175.4 1.02 215.6 215.4 1.25 2 50.2 70.4 19.4 Good test
x 12 74 1758.3 1757.9 1717.9 17:28 00:08 17:36 215.9 215.8 1.25 175.7 175.6 1.02 215.9 215.8 1.25 2 14.4 70.8 19.9 Good test
x 13 75 1763.5 1763.1 1723.1 17:45 00:10 17:55 216.5 216.4 1.25 176.1 175.9 1.02 216.5 216.4 1.25 2 17.1 71.0 10.0 Good test
x 14 76 1767.0 1766.6 1726.6 17:59 00:20 18:19 217.0 216.8 1.25 216.8 1.25 3 10.0 Tight Test
x 15 77 1766.5 1766.1 1726.1 18:24 00:06 18:30 216.9 216.7 1.25 176.5 176.3 1.02 216.9 216.7 1.25 3 11.3 71.0 10.0 Good test
16 78 1777.5 1777.1 1737.1 18:39 00:13 18:52 218.2 218.1 1.25 177.7 177.5 1.02 218.2 218.1 1.25 3 3.2 71.2 10.2 Additional point. Misake made with depth
x 17 79 1775.5 1775.1 1735.1 18:54 00:08 19:02 218.0 217.8 1.25 177.4 177.2 1.02 218.0 217.8 1.25 3 15.3 71.3 10.0 Good test
x 18 80 1786.0 1785.6 1745.6 19:05 00:09 19:14 219.3 219.1 1.25 178.4 178.2 1.02 219.3 219.1 1.25 3 27.5 71.4 10.0 Good test
x 19 81 1797.5 1797.1 1757.1 19:19 00:09 19:28 220.6 220.5 1.25 179.4 179.2 1.02 220.6 220.5 1.25 3 425.6 71.7 10.1,9.9 Good test. Repeated drawdown
x 20 84 1871.0 1870.6 1830.6 19:44 00:07 19:51 229.5 229.4 1.25 229.4 1.25 4 Tight Test
x 21 85 1871.4 1871.0 1831.0 19:55 00:10 20:05 229.6 229.4 1.25 186.6 186.4 1.02 229.6 229.4 1.25 4 352.0 73.9 10.1,10.0Good test. Repeated drawdown
x 22 86 1879.0 1878.6 1838.6 20:09 00:08 20:17 230.5 230.4 1.25 187.4 187.2 1.02 230.4 230.5 1.25 4 192.5 74.3 10.1 Good Test
x 23 88 1884.0 1883.6 1843.6 20:21 00:07 20:28 231.1 231.0 1.25 188.0 187.8 1.02 231.2 231.0 1.25 4 9.6 74.7 10.1 Good test
x 24 89 1733.2 1732.8 1692.8 20:57 00:11 21:08 213.0 212.7 1.25 175.2 174.9 1.03 212.9 212.7 1.25 5 214.6 70.2 10,10 Good test. Repeat for QC purpose
x 25 90 1751.8 1751.4 1711.4 21:11 00:14 21:25 215.1 214.9 1.25 175.4 175.2 1.02 215.1 214.9 1.25 2 40.6 69.8 10.1, 10 Good test. Repeated drawdown
x 26 91 1753.0 1752.6 1712.6 21:28 00:08 21:36 215.3 215.1 1.25 175.4 175.2 1.02 215.1 215.3 1.25 2 22.2 70.2 10.1 Good test
x 27 92 1756.3 1755.9 1715.9 21:38 00:15 21:53 215.7 215.5 1.25 175.7 175.5 1.02 215.7 215.5 1.25 2 17.5 70.7 10.1,10 First drawdown did not stabilise.
x 28 93 1760.8 1760.4 1720.4 21:55 00:17 22:12 216.2 216.0 1.25 175.9 175.7 1.02 216.2 216.0 1.25 2 4.2 71.0 10.3,9.4 First drawdown did not stabilise
x 29 104 1751.8 1751.4 1711.4 05:45 00:10 05:55 215.2 1.25 175.4 1.02 2 22.0 70.9 10.0 Abandoned sample due to gas
x 30 107 1755.2 1754.8 1714.8 07:15 00:10 07:25 215.5 1.25 175.5 1.02 2 13.0 72.0 10.0 Sample abandoned due to lost seal
x 31 110 1754.7 1754.3 1714.3 08:15 00:10 08:25 215.5 1.25 175.5 1.02 2 6.0 72.0 10.0 Tight Test
x 32 11 1758.3 1757.9 1717.9 08:35 00:05 08:40 2 72.4 10.0 Tight Test
x 34 114 1755.5 1755.1 1715.1 09:00 00:10 09:10 215.5 1.25 175.6 1.02 2 17.7 72.0 10.0 Sample abandoned due to plugged tool
x 39 123 1755.2 1754.8 1714.8 14:35 00:05 14:40 2 72.7 10.0 Tight Test
x 40 124 1754.7 1754.3 1714.3 14:55 00:30 15:25 215.3 1.25 175.5 1.02 2 4.7 72.6 10.0 Tight Test
x 42 132 1733.2 1732.8 1692.8 21:10 00:15 21:25 212.6 1.25 175.0 1.03 1 363.0 71.2 10.0 Sample abandoned due to pump
x 43 143 1733.2 1732.8 1692.8 12:30 00:10 12:40 212.6 1.25 175.1 1.03 1 416.7 71.0 10.0 6 x MPSR samples taken

CONFIDENTIAL
9.6.2. Sample Summary table
Date: 14/04/2008 Well: P11-06 Client: Petro-Canada Netherlands BV
Sampling File Depth Hydro Formation Temp Pumping Volume Minimum Comments Forecast
Point Number MDBRT TVDSS QG QG QG Time Pumped Draw-Down
(#) (#) (m) (m) (bara) (bara) (degC) (hh:mm) (Litres) Pressure
Samples taken despite slugs still seen

1 116 1755.2 1714.8 215.5 175.4 72.7 03:35 34.8 103.7 on LFA response. N/A
Samples taken at SLB advice due to

2 126 1754.5 1714.1 215.3 175.5 72.6 04:35 141.3 131.2 pump showing signs of potential failure N/A
3 144 1733.2 1692.8 212.6 175.1 71.8 03:45 288.0 174.5 Samples taken with Quick-Siver N/A
4 148 1797.5 1757.1 219.8 179.4 74.3 02:25 124.0 176.2 injection N/A
5 153 1871.4 1831.0 228.9 186.6 76.8 01:30 101.0 186.0 injection N/A
Sample Depth Time MRMS Sample Sample Prior to Sampling Sample Opening Closing
Tool MDBRT Start Finish Slot Bottle Chamber Fluid Pumped E. Time Time Pressure Pressure
Type No (m) (hh:mm) (hh:mm) (No) (No) Type (litres) (hh:mm) (hh:mm) (bara) (bara) Formation Sent To
Oil Phase sent all samples were sent to Corelab in Aberdeen for analysis

CONFIDENTIAL
9.6.3. Formation Pressures
Formation Pressure Plot
1650.0
1670.0
1690.0
1710.0
Depth (m) tvdss
1730.0 Volpriehausen Gas

Volpriehausen Oil
1750.0
Volpriehausen Water
Hew itt
1770.0
QC Repeat
1790.0
1810.0
1830.0
1850.0
170 172 174 176 178 180 182 184 186 188 190
Pressure ((bara))
9.6.4. Hydrostatic Pressures
Hydrostatic Pressure Plot
1650.0
1670.0
1690.0
1710.0
Depth (m) tvdss
1730.0
Hydrostatic (before)
1750.0
Hydrostatic (after)
1770.0
1790.0
1810.0
1830.0
1850.0
205 210 215 220 225 230 235
Pressure (bara)

CONFIDENTIAL
9.6.5. Gauge Temperatures
Gauge Temperature vs TVDSS
1650.0
1670.0
1690.0
1710.0
Depth (m) tvdss
1730.0
1750.0
1770.0
1790.0
1810.0
1830.0
1850.0
66.0 67.0 68.0 69.0 70.0 71.0 72.0 73.0 74.0 75.0 76.0
Temperature (DegC)
9.6.6. Mobilities
Formation Mobilities
1650.0
1670.0
1690.0
1710.0
Depth (m) tvdss
1730.0
1750.0
1770.0
1790.0
1810.0
1830.0
1850.0
1.0 10.0 100.0 1000.0
Mobility (mD/cP)

CONFIDENTIAL
9.7. MSCT Summary Sheet
Petro-Canada
Well: P11-06 (Van Ghent) 16th April
MSCT description sheet 2008
8 ½” Section
No: Depth Core Sample Description Length Time to cut
(m) recovered core
(cms) (secs)
1 1800.0 SST: light grey green (unless stated 4.6 290
otherwise), f. No fluorescence.
2 1792.3 SST: f-m. Spotted fluorescence, 5% very dull 4.7 240
yellow.
3 1776.4 SST: f-m Mod-bright yellow fluorescence 4.6 140
4 1767.7 SST: f-m. Streaked mod-bright yellow 4.2 160
fluorescence
5 1763.3 SST: Even mod-bright yellow fluorescence 3.8 170
6 1757.4 This core was lost during first run in hole, but 4.5 180
recovered on the second. SST: off white m.
Even bright yellow fluorescence, white on
fresh surface.
7 1751 SST: off white, vf-f, live brown oil stain. 4.0 200
Spotted pale mod yellow fluorescence
8 1746.2 SST: m. Even very pale yellow fluorescence 5.0 120
9 1742.5 SST: m-crs. Even pale, locally moderately 3.8 180
yellow fluorescence
10 1738.8 SST: m-crs. Spotted 5% mod yellow 4.0 160
fluorescence
11 1733.1 SST: m. Streaked very dull yellow 4.5 150
fluorescence. No show on fresh surface
12 1729.5 Missing - 150
13 1724.3 SST: vf. No fluorescence 4.3 120
14 1720.4 SST: f-m. No fluorescence 4.2 120
15 1716.0 SST: f-m. Even very pale yellow fluorescence 4.4 100
16 1709.25 SST: f. Spotted orange-brown fluorescence. 4.2 110
No show on fresh surface
17 1799.0 Missing - 45
18 1786.0 SST: m-crs, spotty dark brown oil bleeding. 5 4.5 90
% spotty pale to yellow fluorescence
19 1772.5 Missing - 90
20 1766.1 SST: m, patchy light brown live oil stain, 4.8 90
minor gas bubbling. Even pale-mod yellow
fluorescence
21 1760.8 SST: f. Even bright yellow fluorescence 4.9 60
22 1754.5 Missing - 70
23 1750.0 SST: off white, f-crs, rare residual oil staining. 4.0 140
10% streaked/spotty pale-mod yellow
fluorescence
24 1745.0 SST: m-crs, sl argillaceous (red brown). 5% 4.2 60
spotty pale –mod yellow fluorescence
25 1741.0 SST: f-crs, sl arg (rd brn). Trace spotty pale 4.5 140
yellow fluorescence

CONFIDENTIAL
Petro-Canada
Well: P11-06 (Van Ghent) 16th April
MSCT description sheet 2008
8 ½” Section
No: Depth Core Sample Description Length Time to cut
(m) recovered core
(cms) (secs)
26 1736.6 Missing - 140
27 1732.25 SST: vf-f, spotty residual oil stain. Trace 4.7 130
spotty pale yellow fluorescence
28 1728.4 Missing - 100
29 1725.4 SST: f, occ m-crs, sl arg (rd brn). No 4.0 100
fluorescence
30 1721.2 SST: f-m, sl arg. No fluorescence 3.7 120
31 1717.6 Missing - 30
32 1711.1 Missing - 120
33 1878.6 SST: f, sl arg (rd brn). Streaked yellow 4.8 200
fluorescence from mud. No show on fresh
surface
34 1871.6 Missing - 180
35 1797.3 SST: f-m. No fluorescence. 4.0 120
36 1782.5 SST: f-m, bleeding medium brown oil patches 3.6 40
(10%). Pale to moderate yellow fluorescence.
37 1769.8 SST: f-m, 5% patchy oil bleeding. Patchy to 4.0 75
even bright yellow fluorescence.
38 1764.5 SST: very fine to silt, light to medium brown 4.0 20
live oil stain. Even bright yellow fluorescence.
39 1758.3 SST: f. Even bright yellow to white 4.8 60
fluorescence
40 1753.0 SST: f. Even bright yellow to white 4.0 80
fluorescence
41 1747.5 SST: vf-f, sl arg (rd brn), minor gas bubbling. 4.0 30
60% streaked-even very dull yellow
fluorescence
42 1744.0 SST: f-crs. 10% spotted pale yellow 4.5 50
fluorescence
43 1739.1 SST: f-m. 30% streaked bright yellow 4.3 130
fluorescence.
44 1734.3 SST: f-med. No fluorescence. 4.0 100
45 1731.0 Missing - 140
47 1723 SST: f-crs. No fluorescence. 4.6 90
49 1713.6 SST: f-crs, crumbly. No fluorescence. 3.0 120

CONFIDENTIAL
9.8. P11-06 8 ½” Section Service Quality Issues
Failure
No Date Well Run Service Issue Description Net Result for Petro-Canada
Group
1 12-Apr-08 P11-06 N/A N/A Winch is not upgraded to high-tension modification Winch is limited to 8,000 lbs pull. Increased chance of 1
fishing operations.
2 13-Apr-08 P11-06 2C MDT Strain and quartz gauges in the MDT were reading 40 minutes of rig time 5 or 6?
differently. Tool was pulled to surface and gauges
flushed with silicon oil
3 13-Apr-08 P11-06 2C MDT MDT failed to set at 1758.3m. It was believed to be a 30 minutes of rig time 6
solenoid valve issue in the MRPS (standard probe).
The valves were cycled a number of times downhole
and the tool began to work again.
4 14-Apr-06 P11-06 2D/F MDT Pump-out module started to ‘short-stroke’. MDT Additional time taken for MDT sampling. The turn 6
pulled to surface for service around time was 10 hours 20 minutes
5 15-Apr-06 P11-06 2F MDT Seal valve failure on MRMS during gas sampling. Two additional gas samples were taken to ensure 6
quality samples were obtained. Potentially could have
prevented 6 samples from being taken.
6 16-Apr-06 P11-06 2G MSCT Bit mechanism failed to rotate to ‘eject’ 2 hours of rig time to pull out of hole and free up bit 6
mechanism
Failure Groups:
Failure Group 1 (Unit Mechanical & Electrical) Failure Group 6 (Down-hole mechanical)
Failure Group 2 (Surface equip. depth/tension/collector) Failure Group 7 (Human error)
Failure Group 3 (Software, Modules) Failure Group 8 (Perforating and sampling)
Failure Group 4 (Cables and accessories) Failure Group 9 (Experimental)
Failure Group 5 (Downhole electronics) Failure Group 10 (Pressure Equipment

CONFIDENTIAL
9.9. Wireline Job Execution Summary
Performance Evaluation sheet was not provided to Log QC by Schlumberger

CONFIDENTIAL
10. About the Author

The author, Ian Barwick, obtained a Bachelor of Science First Class Honours Degree in
Exploration Geology at the University of Wales, Cardiff. He joined Baker Atlas as a Field
Engineer in 1998. He worked as a Field Engineer in Aberdeen, Texas, Azerbaijan and
Kazakhstan. His last 2 ½ years in Baker Atlas was spent as Engineer in Charge of
offshore operations in the Kazakhstan sector of the Caspian Sea. Since April 2007 he has
been an independent consultant based in Hampshire, England offering services to the oil
industry.
Ian Barwick BSc

Wireline Logging QA
Gaia Earth Sciences Limited

www.gaia-earth.co.uk ian@gaia-earth.co.uk
13 Tower Street, Alton, Hampshire, GU34 1NX, UK

Phone: +44 (0)1420 85430
Mobile: +44 (0)7776 180514


23. APPENDIX J: BOREHOLE SEISMIC QC REPORT, RUN 2D (RPS ENERGY)

QUALITY CONTROL REPORT
FOR
ZERO OFFSET CHECKSHOT
ON
P11-06
BY
SCHLUMBERGER
FOR
PETRO CANADA NETHERLANDS B.V.
15th April 2008
Report No. : EOB0729 RPS Energy,

The Innovation Centre, Exploration Drive,
Author(s) : Martin Ellis Bridge of Don, Aberdeen,
AB23 8GX
Approved : T +44 (0)1224 355 315
F +44 (0)1224 355382
Date : 24th April 2008 E rpshuk@rpsgroup.co.uk
W www.rpsgroup.com
EOB0729/PetroCanada/P11-06/ME/LH
CONTENTS
Title Page
List of Contents Page Number
1. SUMMARY 1
2. SURVEY REQUIREMENTS 2
2.1. OBJECTIVES 2
2.2. PROGRAMME 2
3. OPERATIONS 4
3.1 OPERATIONS CHRONOLOGY 4
3.2 SURVEY PERSONNEL 5
3.3 SURVEY STATISTICS 5
4. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 6
4.1 SAFETY 6
4.2 DOWNHOLE GEOPHONE ASSEMBLY 6
4.3 RECORDING EQUIPMENT 6
4.4 SOURCE 7
5. SURVEY RESULTS 8
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9

6.1. CONCLUSIONS 9
6.2. RECOMMENDATIONS 9
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1 : Survey Statistics
APPENDIX 2 : Field Report
APPENDIX 3 : Well Data
APPENDIX 4 : Equipment Data
APPENDIX 5 : QC Checklist
1. SUMMARY
On the 15th April 2008 a rig based zero offset checkshot survey was conducted on the P11-06
exploration well offshore Netherlands.
The survey was undertaken by Schlumberger onboard the jack-up drilling rig ‘GSF Labrador’.
Schlumberger provided the wireline.
The toolstring comprised a dual level VSI/GR deployed by wireline and the source a 3 x 150
in3 cluster.
A total of 32 checkshot levels were recorded. Data quality from the deepest level recorded at
1892m up to 727m was good throughout. Moderate amplitude casing interference was
observed at 675m which would not allow a reliable transit time to be field picked. Above 675m
quality degraded rapidly until 519m where high amplitude casing interference rendered the
data useless.
The well was shutdown for a total of 5 hrs 45 mins.
No lost time was incurred and no health and safety issues were observed or reported.
This report outlines the operating procedures and data acquisition system together with an
appraisal of the safety aspects, survey equipment, data quality and overall performance of the
rig based operations.
Details of survey statistics, levels shot and an operations summary are provided.
EOB0729/PetroCanada/P11-06/ME/LH 1
2. SURVEY REQUIREMENTS
2.1. OBJECTIVES
The P11-06 borehole seismic objective was:
• Establish a seismic to well tie.
2.2. PROGRAMME
In order to achieve the objective, a zero offset checkshot survey was proposed. Levels at
nominal 50m MD increments from near TD at 1980m up to the shallowest meaningful level
would be required. A complete list is provided below.
# Actual Depth
Horizon
mtrs (MDBRT)
RIH
1 Top Chalk 770
2 Top Holland 1354
POOH
3 TD 1892
4 Top Hewett 1871
5 Top Lwr Bundsandstein 1801
6 OWC 1761
7 GWC 1752
8 BCU/ Top Volpriehausen 1702
9 In fill 1662
10 In fill 1621
11 In fill 1580
12 Fault/Top Vlieland 1539
13 In fill 1503
14 Lower Holland Marl Mbr 1467
15 In fill 1433
16 Top Mid Holland Clays Mbr 1398
17 Top Holland 1354
18 Top Texel Greensand 1328
19 In fill 1280
20 In fill 1232
21 In fill 1183
22 Top Texel 1134
23 Top ‘Fast Chalk’ / In fill 1082
24 In fill 1030
25 In fill 978
26 In fill 926
27 In fill 874
28 In fill 822
29 Top Chalk 770
30 Top Landen 727
31 In fill 675
32 In fill 623
33 In fill 571
34 In fill 519
35 In fill 467
36 In fill 415
37 Base Miocene Unc 361
38 In-fill 310
The depths were provided by the operations geologist and confirmed from wireline logs.
3. OPERATIONS
3.1 OPERATIONS CHRONOLOGY
12/4/08
13.00 Mobilised from home. Taxi to LHR.
13.30 Arrived LHR.
16.20 Departed LHR.
18.40 Arrived Schiphol. Train to Den Helder.
20.25 Arrived Den Helder. Taxi to hotel.
20.35 Checked into hotel.
13/4/08
08.45 Checked out hotel. Taxi to Den Helder heliport.
09.00 Arrived heliport.
10.30 Departed Den Helder.
11.15 Arrived on board ‘Glomar Labrador’. Commenced safety induction.
12.15 Completed safety induction. Met with Petro Canada Co. Man Bea
Hazelaar and wellsite geologist Henk Van Gastel. Was advised that TD
reached at 1892m and first 2 wireline runs complete. MDT currently in the
well.
12.30 Met with Schlumberger seismic operator Ken Gordon. Discussed
operations and survey timing.
13.00 Commenced seismic equipment rig up and deployment.
18.30 All equipment deployed. Unable to test equipment since wireline/Maxis in
use.
14/4/08
07.00 SLB sampling with MDT.
12.30 Received confirmed formation top depths.
13.00 Finalised workplan and emailed same to Mike Eynon for confirmation.
22.20 Was advised that MDT probe blocked. POOH to commence checkshot.
23.30 Guns deployed and test fired. Soft start procedure employed. Recharge
time determined (15 secs used). 12 secs to recharge. All OK.
15/4/08
00.45 Well ready for checkshot survey. Toolbox talk on drill floor.
01.00 Commenced dual VSI/GR rig up.
01.30 Toolstring retested, evaluation checks performed and zeroed. All OK. RIH.
02.15 Toolstring at run in checklevel at 770m. Good data.
02.35 Toolstring at run in checklevel at 1354m. Good data.
02.50 Depth correlation commenced at 1775m.
02.55 Depth correlation complete. 1m subtracted.
03.00 TD ‘tagged’ at 1892m.
03.05 Checkshots commenced at 1892m
05.40 Checkshots terminated at 519m due to severe casing interference.
06.00 Toolstring at surface. Depth error 0.3m.
06.30 Toolstring rigged down. Well released.
07.30 Preliminary survey details prepared and emailed to Mike Eynon.
08.40 Departed ‘Glomar Labrador’.
09.10 Arrived heliport.
09.40 Departed Den Helder.
11.00 Arrived Schiphol.
13.30 Departed Schiphol.
14.00 Arrived London Heathrow. Taxi to home.
15.00 Demobilised at home.
16/4/08
AM/PM QC’d SLB field report. Finalised QC report and checklist.
3.2 SURVEY PERSONNEL
Name Responsibility Company
Rig
Bea Hazelaar Drilling Supervisor Petro Canada
Henk Van Gastel Wellsite geologist HRH
Ken Gordon Seismic operator Schlumberger
Martin Ellis Client Tech. rep RPS Energy
3.3 SURVEY STATISTICS
Operation Time Date
Well available, commenced rig up 00.45 15/4/08

C/S commenced 03.05 “
C/S completed 05.40 “
Well released, rig down completed 06.30 “
Average shooting rate p/l : 4.84 mins

Total well shutdown : 5 hrs 45 mins
Time lost : None
Non productive time : None
4. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
4.1 SAFETY
All work carried out by the contractor was done so in a safe manner and complied with all
safety regulations as discussed with the GSF safety representative and OIM before the survey
commenced. Schlumberger personnel showed a positive approach to safety and were seen to
be wearing the correct protective clothing.
All high-pressure equipment and airlines were taped off and PA announcements made
warning of high-pressure air usage.
The author was present at a safety meeting with Schlumberger, GSF drilling and the Petro
Canada drilling supervisor and briefed the relevant parties on the safety and logistical aspects
of the survey operations. Toolbox meetings were held with the drill crew just prior to sound
source deployment and toolstring rig up.
Full MMO procedures to JNCC guidelines were implemented prior to the survey and ‘soft start’
firing procedures were employed prior to gun array synchronisation and stability testing.
No HSE incidents were observed or reported.
4.2 DOWNHOLE GEOPHONE ASSEMBLY
Schlumberger utilised a dual level VSI / GR toolstring (primary plus back-up in hole) for the
survey which functioned without fault throughout.
Telemetry, VSI and GR cartridges were separated from the VSI sondes by wireline bridles.
The receiver section ‘sub’ of each sonde contained three orthogonally mounted geophone
accelerometers (GAC type ’D’). The GAC outputs were fed into a telemetry and signal-
conditioning cartridge, which provided signal conditioning, A/D conversion, IFP amplifier and
filtering circuitry. The digitised signals were then transmitted uphole via the telemetry cartridge.
Each ‘sub’ was physically de-coupled from its sonde body. The ‘sub’ isolation was provided by
springs that acted to transmit the force of application of the arm whilst isolating the GAC
sensors from the modal resonances of the tool body.
Tests that could be conducted prior to and during the survey included;
System noise evaluation (minimum and maximum gain)

System distortion
Harmonic distortion
Cross talk
Gain tests
Impulse response
Toolstring to borehole coupling was good throughout. The arms fitted to each VSI sonde could
provide coupling up to ~14” diameter boreholes. The arm locking force was displayed
graphically in the recording unit to show coupling effectiveness.
Depth was corrected to a GR recorded as part of a PEX run. A correction of 1m was

subtracted near TD. The depth error on pull out was found to be 0.3m.
4.3 RECORDING EQUIPMENT
The system employed for recording the downhole and hydrophone signals was a dual bay
Minimum Configuration Maxis (MCM) unit that was interfaced to a well seismic acquisition
(WSAM) module. The module controlled the acquisition and digitisation of the hydrophone
signal together with downhole tool communication.
The MCM software version OP 16 used a window type programme to display downhole and
hydrophone data. The windows were sizeable and the data displayed could be scrolled to view
different parts of the signal. Dual 21” high definition monitors were provided to allow data to be
examined without interruption to the primary acquisition.
Shots and stacks were recorded onto hard disc and later backed up to CD. Data, after being
written to disc were compared with the data held in memory. Any difference would display an
error message.
The auto picking routine used for determination of waveform first break travel times performed
well throughout.
All field picks were timed from hydrophone to integrated accelerometer (geophone) break.
The software provided allowed a frequency analysis to be conducted on any of the recorded
downhole signals together with the sound source signature as monitored by the hydrophone.
Data were sampled at 1ms and each downhole signal recorded for 4 seconds.
4.4 SOURCE
The sound source deployed from the starboard side rig crane comprised a 3 x 150 in3 G gun
array. The array was deployed to a depth of 4.5m below mean sea surface via a floatation
buoy and operated at a pressure of 2000 psi. A suitably weighted Geospace MP24D
hydrophone positioned at the array midpoint 9m below mean sea surface monitored the
source output. An in-water spare was provided.
High pressure air was supplied via a high flow rate pressure regulator from two 48 bottle
‘Quad’ reservoir gas racks initially charged to 4000psi. Large diameter air hoses were provided
to reduce the array recharge time to 12 seconds between shots. The Auto Fire Delay (AFD)
was set to 15 seconds as a precaution to allow the array to fully recharge to operating
pressure.
Source synchronisation was achieved using a WSI source controller link which could adjust
the time of each gun in 1ms increments. The array was checked at regular intervals
throughout the survey and was found to be completely stable with synchronisation better than
1ms.
Significant wave height was 1m with a moderate sea state. The mean wind speed was 20
knots. The source array together with the source controller functioned without fault throughout.
5. SURVEY RESULTS
The zero offset checkshot survey was carried out from 1892m to 519m. A total of 32 levels
were recorded. Drilled TD was 1892m with a 9⅝” casing shoe set at 1703m. The nominal 8½”
drilled diameter open hole was thought to be in good condition as observed on a previously
run calliper log.
Data quality from the deepest level recorded at 1892m up to 727m was good throughout.
Moderate amplitude casing interference was observed at 675m which would not allow a
reliable transit time to be field picked. Above 675m quality degraded rapidly until 519m where
high amplitude casing interference rendered the data useless.
No tube wave interference was observed.
A GR correlation was recorded throughout. A correction of –1m (1m subtracted) was applied
to compensate for cable stretch. The depth error on pull out was found to be 0.3m.
A minimum of three shots per level was recorded.
Run in checkshots were found to correspond to within 1ms of the same outrun depths.
A field report correlating level, number of shots per level (together with shot numbers) and
average one way travel time for each level is presented in Appendix 2.
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1. CONCLUSIONS
Within the bounds of the system utilised and the specification followed the survey was
acquired safely and fulfilled the survey objectives well within the estimated time.
Schlumberger provided a time / depth computation listing rapidly upon survey completion. The
normally provided VSI checkshot field report could not be produced in a timely manner
because the Maxis MCM was busy with continuing MDT logging operations. Since the author
and Schlumberger seismic operator were requested to depart the rig less than 2 hrs following
rig down, the field report was to be produced in Aberdeen and passed on to the author for QC.
The author and Schlumberger seismic operator were not mobilised to the rig until after logging
had commenced which, with the Maxis unit and wireline in use, provided no opportunity to
carry out essential equipment checks. It is the author’s opinion that had the equipment failed to
test successfully possible significant downtime would have been incurred.
The above not withstanding the Schlumberger seismic operator and crew should be
congratulated on a rapid, efficient and trouble free acquisition. The operator was very
experienced with the system and was willing to work with and accept suggestions from the
author.
A full suite of back up equipment was provided.
No downtime was incurred.
6.2. RECOMMENDATIONS
The following point should be noted;
• The seismic specialist and QC rep should be on site ~24hrs prior to expected wireline rig
up to allow full and complete equipment testing.
APPENDIX 1
Survey Statistics
SURVEY STATISTICS
SURVEY TYPE : Zero offset checkshot
DEEPEST LEVEL SHOT : 1892m
SHALLOWEST LEVEL : 519m
LEVEL INCREMENTS : various
TOTAL LEVELS : 32
SURVEY START TIME : 00.45 hrs 15/4/08
SURVEY FINISH TIME : 06.30 hrs 15/4/08
TOTAL WELL SHUTDOWN : 5 hrs 45 mins
TIME LOST CONTRACTOR : None
TIME LOST OTHER CAUSES : None
DEPTH CONTROL TYPE : I.D.W.
DEPTH CORRECTION : -1m
DEPTH ERROR ON PULL OUT : 0.3m
SEA STATE : Moderate
WIND SPEED : 20 kts
SIGNIFICANT WAVE HEIGHT : 1m
APPENDIX 2
Borehole Seismic Field Report
FIELD REPORT
Client: PCNL
Well: P/11-06
Date: 15th April 2008
MD OWTT SHOT Remarks

(m) observed nr
(ms) P/11-06
770 393 21-24 Run in checklevel. 02.15
1354 579 25-27 Run in checklevel 02.35
1892 766 28-31 TD C/S 03.05

1871 760 32-34 Top Hewett
1801 740 35-37 Top Lwr Bundsandstein
1761 726 38-40 OWC
1752 723 41-43 GWC
1702 705 44-46 BCU/ Top Volpriehausen
1662 691 47-49
1621 677 50-52
1580 663 53-55
1539 648 56-58 Fault/Top Vlieland
1503 635 59-61
1467 622 62-64 Lower Holland Marl Mbr
1433 609 65-67
1398 596 68-70 Top Mid Holland Clays Mbr
1354 579 71-73 Top Holland
1328 573 74-76 Top Texel Greensand
1313 569
1280 560 77-80
1232 547 81-83
1183 534 84-86
1134 521 87-89 Top Texel
1082 506 90-92 Top ‘Fast Chalk’
1030 489 93-95
978 471 96-98
926 453 99-101
874 434 102-104
822 415 105-107
770 393 108-110 Top Chalk
727 371 111-113 Top Landen
675 346? 114-118 csg int. pik on Y axis
623 ? 119-123 no TT
571 292? 124-128
519 ? Survey terminated. No TT 05.40
APPENDIX 3
Well Data
WELL DATA
CLIENT : Petro Canada Netherlands B.V.
WELL : P11-06
TYPE : Exploration
BLOCK : P11
RIG NAME : Glomar Labrador
TYPE : Jack up
HEADING : 236° True
LOCATION (Well Head) : 5 801 617.91mN

527 761.71mE
UTM zone 31M on ED50 Datum
Central Meridian 3°E
DEPTH OF CASING SHOE 30” : 146m

13⅜” : 794m
9⅝” : 1703m
DRILLED DEPTH : 1892m
PERMANENT DATUM : MSL
REFERENCE LEVEL : Drill Floor
ELEVATION OF REFERENCE LEVEL : 40m
WATER DEPTH : 34m
MUD TYPE : KCL Polymer
WEIGHT : 1.22 g/cm3
VISCOSITY : 41 s/qt
APPENDIX 4
Equipment Data
EQUIPMENT SERIAL NUMBERS
Downhole tool : VSI 8408

8539
GR (SGTC) 10021
DTCH 8900
WSI 798
WASM 918
Sound Source : 3 'G' gun cluster (150 cu in) 18345

18348
18351
RECORDING EQUIPMENT DATA
CONTRACTOR : Schlumberger
RECORDING SYSTEM TYPE : MCM
RECORDING SYSTEM SAMPLE RATE : 1 ms
RECORDING SYSTEM RECORD LENGTH : 4 secs
DOWNHOLE GEOPHONE TYPE : CSI
SENSOR TYPE : GAC
BOAT SOURCE TYPE : 3 x 150 in3 G gun cluster
DEPTH : 4.5m
VOLUME : 450 in3
PRESSURE : 2000 psi
SOURCE SENSOR TYPE : Geospace MP24D
DEPTH : 9m (4.5m below array midpoint)
OFFSET : 60m
AZIMUTH : 280°
APPENDIX 5
QC Checklist
RPS Energy - QC Checklist - Marine Borehole Seismic Surveys
Well : PCNL; P11-06
Read contractor safety procedures.

9
Discuss survey objectives etc. with client
9
Send Work Plan to contractor and discuss.
9
Pre-mob meeting. 8
Interference assessment - seismic vessels etc.
9
Receive completed JSA.
9
Receive and check Load List. No
Contact telephone list. 9

Pre-survey safety meeting at wellsite. 9
Pre-survey safety meeting on vessel. N/A
Check on sub-sea hazards. 9

All VSP equipment and backup arrived at wellsite. 9
Recording system pre-survey checks. 8 wireline in use on arrival
• Downhole tools pre-survey checks:

All channels active 9
Sensor polarity 9
In-situ tests 9
Arm operation - strength 9
Arm operation - reach 9 ‘standard’ arms fitted
Tool lengths and zero point 9
Rucker system checks N/A
• Safe installation of air supply.

Rig 9 Boat
Barriers 9 Vessel master approved
Signs 9 Installation
P.A. announcements 9
Well : PCNL; P11-06
• Source pre-survey checks.

Rig Source Vessel master informed
Barge master informed 9 Gun & hydrophone depths
Gun & hydrophone depths 9 Individually fire guns etc.
Individually fire guns etc 9 Synchronization
Synchronization 9 +/- 1ms Pressure
. 9 2000psi
PressureVolume Volume
Recharge time 9 15 secs Vessel radio/telemetry tests
Navigation fixes logged
Walkaway cycle test
Boat Source N/A

Check caliper log. 9
Check cement bond log N/A. Cement top estimated at 700m
Approval for major program change. not reqd.
• Information given to VSP engineer

Wellhead co-ordinates 9
Rig heading 9
Reference elevation 9
Seismic datum 9
Water depths and tidal information 9
List of depths (inc. sticky areas etc.) 9
Downhole survey data 9
On site processing requirements
9
• Information given to positioning contractor on vessel
Geodetic data
All co-ordinates - wellhead, walkaway line start/finish etc.
Downhole data
Positioning tolerances
Pre-survey transits
Well : PCNL; P11-06
"Toolbox" safety meeting. 9

Tool zeroed correctly. 9
RIH tests and check levels.
9
Depth correction.
9 1m subtracted. Background log made
• Quality Control of Downhole data:

Polarity 9 Repeatability 9
Signal to noise ratio 9 Amplitude 9
Number of shots 9 3 minimum
Expected transit times and repeated transit times 1 ms
Data integrity on storage device 9
• Quality Control of Source(s)

Rig Boat
Hydrophone data quality 9 Hydrophone data quality
Synchronization 9 Synchronization
Pressure 9 Pressure
Volume 9 450 cu in Volume
Positioning
Navigation fixes logged
Radar check
Contractor maintaining observers log.

9
• Hourly inspection of compressors.
Rig 9 Boat
Re-zero tool and note depth reading. 9 0.3m
Inform rig supervisor when the survey is complete and tool is out of hole. 9
Well : PCNL; P11-06
• Source retrieved safely.

Rig 9 Boat
• Source damaged.
Rig 9 No Boat
Post-survey transits.
Quality control of checkshot report and any on site processing. 9
Fax time/depth data and operational summary to Client. email
Fax any 'quicklook' displays to Client. 9
Data backup satisfactory. 9
Work permits signed off. 9
Signatures:
RPS Energy QC Representative. Contractor VSP Engineer.
M. J. Ellis Ken Gordon


24. APPENDIX K: VELOCITY SURVEY LISTING (SCHLUMBERGER)

Survey type: Zero Offset Checkshot Survey
Company: Petro-Canada Netherlands B.V
Well: P11-06
Field: Van Ghent Prospect
Country: Netherlands
Run: 2E
Date: 15th April 2008
Recorded by: K.Gordon
Witnessed by: M.Ellis

Client: Petro-Canada Netherlands B.V Field: Van Ghent Prospect Well: P11-06
Well Information
Company Petro-Canada Netherlands B.V
Well P11-06
Field Van Ghent Prospect
Country Netherlands
State GSF Labrador 1
Logging Date 15/ 04 / /2008
Run Number 2D
Service Order
Well Head (Latitude) 52* 21' 46.964" N
Well Head (Longitude) 03* 24' 27.645" E
Well Head (X Coordinate) 527761.7 UTM
Well Head (Y Coordinate) 5801618.0 UTM
Total Depth - Driller 1892.0 m
Total Depth - Logger 1892.0 m
Maximum Hole Deviation 0.0 deg
Azimuth of Maximum Deviation
Program Version 15C0-309 SKK 3068 VSI WB: 2.9.18
Bit Size 8.500 in
Recorded by K.Gordon
Witnessed by M.Ellis
Elevation Information
Permanent Datum Mean Sea Level
Elevation Permanent Datum 0.0 m
Above Permanent Datum 40.0 m
Drilling Measured From Drill Floor
Derrick Floor 40.0 m
Ground Level -34.0 m
Kelly Bush 40.0 m
Log Measured From Drill Floor
Elevation Log Zero 40.0 m
Depth Corrected Information
Water Velocity 1500.0 m/s
Seismic Reference Datum 0.0 m
Remarks
Tools run as per tool sketch
Tool string conveyed on conventional wireline
No hole problems or acquisition problems were observed during the survey
Weather conditions remained fair during the survey with a 1.0 - 2.0 m swell
A single VSI was used to acquire the data at 50m intervals as per client request
Logging date: 15/4/2008 Page 2

Well Sketch

Tool Sketch

Well Information
Well Type Open / Cased hole
Rig / Platform Type Jack-Up :GSF Labrador
Well Reference Azimuth (Magnetic, True, or Grid North) True North
Elevation Information
Water Depth 34 m
Elevation Depth 40 m
Sea Condition
Sea Condition Good
Wave Height 1.0 m to 2.0 m

Downhole Equipment Information

Tool Type VSIT-C
Surface Equipment 3 x 150 cu-inch G-Guns- 18345 – 18348 – 18351 ,
WSAM 918 , WSI 798 , DC 3 , Reg D2904 , 2 X
DTL Gas Quads
Combined Tool LEH-QT 2925- ACTS 971,DTC-H 8900, SGTN
10021 , AH-199 DYT 03, 2 level VSI , VSIA
Number of Shuttles 2
Nominal Receiver Spacing 15.12 m
Gimbaled (Y/N) N
Downhole Geophone Type GAC-D Accelerometers
Sensitivity 0.5 V/G +/- 5%
Natural Frequency 20Hz
Damping Factor 5.74
GAC flat band width in acceleration 2-200 Hz
DC Resistance 1500 ohm +/- 3% (@25 degC)
VSCC Temperature 70 Deg C
VSIS 4 Temperature 73 Deg C
Logging Head Temperature 70 Deg C
VSPC 8149
VSCC 8129
VSII Interconnect Bridle 8637
VSIS Shuttle # 2 8408
VSII Interconnect Bridle 8743
VSIS Shuttle # 1 8539
VSIA 8183

General Information
Survey Type Zero Offset Checkshot Survey
Surface Recording Length 1000.0 ms
Suface Sampling Rate 1.0 ms
Downhole Recording Length 4000.0 ms
Downhole Sampling Rate 1.0 ms
Top of Survey 503.9 m
Bottom of Survey 1892.0 m
Number of Shots 110
Number of Downhole Traces 220

Source Configuration (Rig Air Gun Cluster)
Source Location (Rig, Boat, Pit, Borehole) Rig : GSF Labrador

Source Group ID (A, B, C, …) Rig Gun Cluster
Source Offset (for fixed offset) 60 m
Source Azimuth (for fixed offset) 284 degrees T
Source Depth from Surface 4.5 m
Source Depth from Logging Zero 44.5 m
Guns Deployment Method Rig Starboard Side Crane
Gun Controller Type WSI-AB

Gun Controller Model Name WSI-AB
Gun Controller Serial Number 798
Gun Type Sercel G-Guns
Gun Serial Number(s) 18345 , 18348 , 18351
Gun Configuration (3 Gun Cluster, Gun Array, etc.) 3 gun cluster array, 900mm spacing
Gun Chamber Volumes 3 x 150 cu inch
Compressor Type Gas Packs ( 2 x 48 / 50 litre bottles )
Air Regulator Pressure 2000 psi
Surface Sensor Configuration

Number of Surface Reference Sensors 5 ( 2 x Hydrophones + 3 x shot detectors )
Surface Recording Length 1000ms
Surface Sampling Rate 1ms
Sensor Type (S1) Geospace MP24c-L2
Sensor Type (S2) Geospace MP24c-L2
Sensor Type (S3) Shot detector
Sensor Depth from Surface (S1) 9.0 m
Sensor Depth from Logging Zero (S1) 49.0 m
Sensor Offset from Source (S1) 4.5 m below source / 9.0 m from MSL
Sensor Offset from Source (S2) 4.5 m below source / 9.0 m from MSL
Sensor Offset from Source (S3) At source

Source Geometry Sketch

DATE Time Time Time OPERATION

Start Stop Taken Hr :
min
15-Apr-08 01:00 01:30 00:30 Rig up VSI tools
01:30 01:40 00:10 Tool power up and surface equipment checks
Run in hole to checkshot depth at 770 m MD, TT = 393.3
01:40 02:15 00:35
ms
Run in hole to checkshot depth at 1354 m MD, TT =
02:15 02:37 00:22
579.4 ms
02:37 02:50 00:13 Gamma Ray correlation 1.0 m deep ( corrected )
RIH to TD for start of main Checkshot up from 1892 m
02:50 03:05 00:15
MD
Main Checkshot data acquisition from 1892 m MD up to
03:05 05:40 02:35
503.9 m MD
05:40 06:00 00:20 POOH to surface for rig down VSI
06:00 06:30 00:30 Rig down completed
05:30 hrs HRS –TOTAL OPERATING TIME

Geometry Infomation (X-Y)
5801630
5801629
5801628
5801627
5801626
[m]
5801625
Northing
5801624
5801623
5801622
5801621
5801620
5801619
5801618
527700 527720 527740 527760 527780
Easting [m]
Receiver Position
Source Position

Geometry Infomation (Y-Z)
200
400
600
True Vertical Depth [m]
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
5801615 5801620 5801625 5801630
Northing [m]
Receiver Position
Source Position

Geometry Infomation (X-Z)
200
400
600
True Vertical Depth [m]
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
527700 527720 527740 527760 527780
Easting [m]
Receiver Position
Source Position

Stack Summary Listing (1/2) from VSI_001_Rig_geo_wavefield_z.ldf

One-way Two-way Interval Average RMS
Stack Measured True Vertical Measured
Vertical Time Vertical Time Velocity Velocity Velocity
Number Depth [m] Depth [m] Time [s]
[s] [s] [m/s] [m/s] [m/s]
0 0 0 0 0
1792.8
39 571.0 531.0 0.2921 0.2962 0.5924 1792.8 2292.6
1650.3
38 623.0 583.0 0.3234 0.3277 0.6553 1779.1 2238.9
2231.2
37 675.0 635.0 0.3466 0.3510 0.7020 1809.1 2238.4
2126.8
36 727.0 687.0 0.3709 0.3754 0.7509 1829.8 2231.3
1906.3
35 770.0 730.0 0.3933 0.3980 0.7960 1834.2 2214.2
2393.7
34 822.0 782.0 0.4149 0.4197 0.8394 1863.1 2223.8
2773.0
33 873.9 833.9 0.4336 0.4385 0.8769 1902.0 2250.0
2681.1
32 926.0 886.0 0.4529 0.4579 0.9157 1935.0 2270.0
2857.0
31 978.0 938.0 0.4711 0.4761 0.9521 1970.3 2295.2
2910.2
30 1030.0 990.0 0.4889 0.4939 0.9879 2004.3 2320.3
3008.6
29 1082.0 1042.0 0.5061 0.5112 1.0224 2038.2 2346.8
3412.5
28 1134.1 1094.1 0.5213 0.5265 1.0530 2078.1 2384.4
3837.3
27 1183.0 1143.0 0.5340 0.5392 1.0785 2119.7 2428.9
3594.9
26 1232.1 1192.1 0.5476 0.5529 1.1058 2156.1 2464.3
3769.8
25 1280.0 1240.0 0.5603 0.5656 1.1312 2192.4 2501.2
3737.6
24 1312.9 1272.9 0.5690 0.5744 1.1488 2216.1 2524.7
3916.6
24 1328.0 1288.0 0.5729 0.5783 1.1565 2227.4 2536.5
3746.0
23 1354.0 1314.0 0.5798 0.5852 1.1704 2245.4 2554.2
2724.6
22 1398.0 1358.0 0.5959 0.6014 1.2027 2258.3 2558.9
2631.9
21 1433.0 1393.0 0.6092 0.6146 1.2293 2266.4 2560.5
2690.0
20 1466.9 1426.9 0.6218 0.6273 1.2545 2274.9 2563.2
2690.1
19 1503.0 1463.0 0.6352 0.6407 1.2813 2283.6 2565.9
2736.0
18 1539.0 1499.0 0.6483 0.6538 1.3076 2292.7 2569.4
2821.4
17 1579.9 1539.9 0.6628 0.6683 1.3367 2304.1 2575.2
2944.0
16 1621.0 1581.0 0.6768 0.6823 1.3646 2317.2 2583.2
2842.9
15 1662.0 1622.0 0.6912 0.6967 1.3934 2328.1 2588.9
2856.9
14 1702.0 1662.0 0.7052 0.7107 1.4214 2338.5 2594.4
2809.1

Stack Summary Listing (2/2) from VSI_001_Rig_geo_wavefield_z.ldf

One-way Two-way Interval Average RMS
Stack Measured True Vertical Measured
Vertical Time Vertical Time Velocity Velocity Velocity
Number Depth [m] Depth [m] Time [s]
[s] [s] [m/s] [m/s] [m/s]
13 1752.0 1712.0 0.7230 0.7285 1.4570 2350.0 2599.9
2641.7
12 1761.0 1721.0 0.7264 0.7319 1.4638 2351.4 2600.1
3019.4
11 1801.0 1761.0 0.7396 0.7452 1.4903 2363.3 2608.1
3485.6
10 1871.0 1831.0 0.7597 0.7652 1.5305 2392.7 2634.9
3084.1
9 1892.0 1852.0 0.7664 0.7720 1.5441 2398.8 2639.2

Time Depth Plot
500
600
700
800
Vertical Depth (SRD corrected) [m]
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
Vertical Time [s]
One-way Vertical Time

Two-way Vertical Time

Velocity Plot
500
600
700
800
Vertical Depth (SRD corrected) [m]
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Velocity [m/s]
Interval Velocity
Average Velocity
RMS Velocity

Source Sensor Signature Normalization Trace by Trace (100%)

Polarity Normal
One Way Time (ms)
Scaling 33.78 cm/sec, 4.72/cm
One Way Time (ms)

0 100 200 300 400 500
40 40
60 60
Shot #
Shot #
80 80
100 100
120 120
0 100 200 300 400 500

One Way Time (ms)

Raw Stack (X) Normalization Trace by Trace (250%)

Polarity Normal
One Way Time (ms)
Scaling 4.1 cm/sec, 1/5990
One Way Time (ms)

0 1000 2000 3000
600 600
800 800
1000 1000
1200 1200
TVD (m)
TVD (m)
1400 1400
1600 1600
1800 1800
0 1000 2000 3000

One Way Time (ms)

Raw Stack (Y) Normalization Trace by Trace (250%)

Polarity Normal
One Way Time (ms)
One Way Time (ms)

0 1000 2000 3000
600 600
800 800
1000 1000
1200 1200
TVD (m)
TVD (m)
1400 1400
1600 1600
1800 1800
0 1000 2000 3000

One Way Time (ms)

Raw Stack (Z) Normalization Trace by Trace (250%)

Polarity Normal
One Way Time (ms)
One Way Time (ms)

0 1000 2000 3000
600 600
800 800
1000 1000
1200 1200
TVD (m)
TVD (m)
1400 1400
1600 1600
1800 1800
0 1000 2000 3000

One Way Time (ms)

Raw Stack (Z) (Magnified) Normalization Trace by Trace (250%)

Polarity Normal
Zero Time (ms)
Zero Time (ms)

-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300
600 600
800 800
1000 1000
1200 1200
TVD (m)
TVD (m)
1400 1400
1600 1600
1800 1800
-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300

Zero Time (ms)

Surface Sensor QC Plot Page
20
30
40
50
60
70
Shot Number
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
0.0796 0.0798 0.0800 0.0802 0.0804
Break Time (s)
Surface Sensor Break Time

Peak To Peak Plot (X)
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Measured Depth [m]
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
PP Amplitude (mV)
PP Amplitude (mV) accepted for stack

PP Amplitude (mV) rejected

Peak To Peak Plot (Y)
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Measured Depth [m]
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
PP Amplitude (mV)


Peak To Peak Plot (Z)
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Measured Depth [m]
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
PP Amplitude (mV)


Amplitude QC Plot (Surface)
PP Amplitude (bit range)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
0
10
20
30
40
50
Shot Number
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
1 10
Acquisition Gain
PP Amplitude (bit range) accepted for stack

PP Amplitude (bit range) rejected
Acquisition Gain

Amplitude QC Plot (X)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
500
600
700
800
900
Measured Depth [m]
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
1 2 4 8 16 32
Acquisition Gain

Acquisition Gain

Amplitude QC Plot (Y)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
500
600
700
800
900
Measured Depth [m]
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
1 2 4 8 16 32
Acquisition Gain

Acquisition Gain

Amplitude QC Plot (Z)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
500
600
700
800
900
Measured Depth [m]
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
1 2 4 8 16 32
Acquisition Gain

Acquisition Gain

Observer's Note (1/3)

Well depth
Time Shot Type Shot# Stack# Source Remarks
[m]
29.3 23:36:59 NOTO 1 Rig
29.3 23:37:22 NOTO 2 Rig
29.3 23:37:56 NOTO 3 Rig
29.3 23:38:33 NOTO 4 Rig
29.3 23:38:55 NOTO 5 Rig
29.3 23:39:25 NOTO 6 Rig
29.3 23:39:38 NOTO 7 Rig
29.3 23:39:52 NOTO 8 Rig
29.3 23:40:13 NOTO 9 Rig
29.3 23:40:34 NOTO 10 Rig
29.3 23:40:48 NOTO 11 Rig
29.3 23:41:16 NOTO 12 Rig
464.5 02:02:13 BKGD 18
770.0 02:15:24 BKGD 21
770.0 02:15:34 SHOT 22 6 Rig RIH C/SHOT TT = 393.3 ms
770.0 02:16:07 SHOT 23 6 Rig
770.0 02:16:25 SHOT 24 6 Rig
1354.0 02:37:06 SHOT 25 8 Rig RIH C/SHOT TT = 579.4 ms
1354.0 02:37:30 SHOT 26 8 Rig
1354.0 02:37:43 SHOT 27 8 Rig
1892.0 03:08:08 SHOT 28 9 Rig START Checkshots up
1892.0 03:08:21 SHOT 29 9 Rig
1892.0 03:08:34 SHOT 30 9 Rig
1892.0 03:08:47 SHOT 31 9 Rig
1871.0 03:11:36 SHOT 32 10 Rig
1871.0 03:11:49 SHOT 33 10 Rig
1871.0 03:12:02 SHOT 34 10 Rig
1801.0 03:16:06 SHOT 35 11 Rig
1801.0 03:16:19 SHOT 36 11 Rig
1801.0 03:16:32 SHOT 37 11 Rig
1761.0 03:19:28 SHOT 38 12 Rig
1761.0 03:19:41 SHOT 39 12 Rig
1761.0 03:19:54 SHOT 40 12 Rig
1752.0 03:22:23 SHOT 41 13 Rig
1752.0 03:22:37 SHOT 42 13 Rig
1752.0 03:22:50 SHOT 43 13 Rig
1702.0 03:26:06 SHOT 44 14 Rig
1702.0 03:26:19 SHOT 45 14 Rig
1702.0 03:26:32 SHOT 46 14 Rig
1662.0 03:29:13 SHOT 47 15 Rig
1662.0 03:29:27 SHOT 48 15 Rig
1662.0 03:29:40 SHOT 49 15 Rig
1621.0 03:33:33 SHOT 50 16 Rig
1621.0 03:33:46 SHOT 51 16 Rig
1621.0 03:33:59 SHOT 52 16 Rig
1579.9 03:38:56 SHOT 53 17 Rig
1579.9 03:39:09 SHOT 54 17 Rig
1579.9 03:39:22 SHOT 55 17 Rig
1539.0 03:43:39 SHOT 56 18 Rig
1539.0 03:43:52 SHOT 57 18 Rig
1539.0 03:44:05 SHOT 58 18 Rig
1503.0 03:48:13 SHOT 59 19 Rig
1503.0 03:48:26 SHOT 60 19 Rig
1503.0 03:48:39 SHOT 61 19 Rig
1466.9 03:52:00 SHOT 62 20 Rig
1466.9 03:52:13 SHOT 63 20 Rig
1466.9 03:52:26 SHOT 64 20 Rig
1433.0 03:56:07 SHOT 65 21 Rig
1433.0 03:56:21 SHOT 66 21 Rig


Well depth
[m]
1433.0 03:56:35 SHOT 67 21 Rig
1398.0 03:59:49 SHOT 68 22 Rig
1398.0 04:00:02 SHOT 69 22 Rig
1398.0 04:00:15 SHOT 70 22 Rig
1354.0 04:03:58 SHOT 71 23 Rig
1354.0 04:04:13 SHOT 72 23 Rig
1354.0 04:04:34 SHOT 73 23 Rig
1328.0 04:08:49 SHOT 74 24 Rig
1328.0 04:09:02 SHOT 75 24 Rig
1328.0 04:09:15 SHOT 76 24 Rig
1280.0 04:12:40 SHOT 77 25 Rig
1280.0 04:12:53 SHOT 78 25 Rig
1280.0 04:13:06 SHOT 79 25 Rig
1280.0 04:13:19 SHOT 80 25 Rig
1232.1 04:18:23 SHOT 81 26 Rig
1232.1 04:18:37 SHOT 82 26 Rig
1232.1 04:18:50 SHOT 83 26 Rig
1183.0 04:24:02 SHOT 84 27 Rig
1183.0 04:24:15 SHOT 85 27 Rig
1183.0 04:24:28 SHOT 86 27 Rig
1134.1 04:29:32 SHOT 87 28 Rig
1134.1 04:29:45 SHOT 88 28 Rig
1134.1 04:29:58 SHOT 89 28 Rig
1082.0 04:35:35 SHOT 90 29 Rig
1082.0 04:35:49 SHOT 91 29 Rig
1082.0 04:36:02 SHOT 92 29 Rig
1030.0 04:40:44 SHOT 93 30 Rig
1030.0 04:40:57 SHOT 94 30 Rig
1030.0 04:41:10 SHOT 95 30 Rig
978.0 04:45:32 SHOT 96 31 Rig
978.0 04:45:45 SHOT 97 31 Rig
978.0 04:46:07 SHOT 98 31 Rig
926.0 04:50:28 SHOT 99 32 Rig
926.0 04:50:44 SHOT 100 32 Rig
926.0 04:50:57 SHOT 101 32 Rig
873.9 04:55:26 SHOT 102 33 Rig
873.9 04:55:39 SHOT 103 33 Rig
873.9 04:55:52 SHOT 104 33 Rig
822.0 05:00:06 SHOT 105 34 Rig
822.0 05:00:19 SHOT 106 34 Rig
822.0 05:00:32 SHOT 107 34 Rig
770.0 05:06:10 SHOT 108 35 Rig
770.0 05:06:23 SHOT 109 35 Rig
770.0 05:06:36 SHOT 110 35 Rig
727.0 05:10:35 SHOT 111 36 Rig
727.0 05:10:48 SHOT 112 36 Rig
727.0 05:11:01 SHOT 113 36 Rig
675.0 05:15:45 SHOT 114 37 Rig Casing arrivals evident
675.0 05:16:02 SHOT 115 37 Rig
675.0 05:16:20 SHOT 116 37 Rig
675.0 05:16:33 SHOT 117 37 Rig
675.0 05:16:46 SHOT 118 37 Rig
623.0 05:21:35 SHOT 119 38 Rig Very noisy ... bad time picking
623.0 05:21:49 SHOT 120 38 Rig
623.0 05:22:02 SHOT 121 38 Rig
623.0 05:22:15 SHOT 122 38 Rig
623.0 05:22:30 SHOT 123 38 Rig
571.0 05:26:59 SHOT 124 39 Rig Very noisy ... bad time picking
571.0 05:27:28 SHOT 125 39 Rig


Well
depth[m]
571.0 05:27:41 SHOT 126 39 Rig
571.0 05:27:54 SHOT 127 39 Rig
571.0 05:28:07 SHOT 128 39 Rig
519.0 05:36:03 SHOT 129 40 Rig junk
519.0 05:36:18 SHOT 130 40 Rig
519.0 05:36:31 SHOT 131 40 Rig

Shot Summary Listing (1/2)

Measured Tool Stack Relative Caliper Anchoring
Shot number
Depth [m] Number Number Bearing [deg] [in] force [kg]
571.0 2 39 9.9 9.6 865.2 124, 125, 126, 127, 128
623.0 2 38 0.4 9.6 832.6 119, 120, 121, 122, 123
675.0 2 37 -5.2 9.6 818.1 115, 116, 117, 118
727.0 2 36 -10.1 9.6 827.6 111, 112, 113
770.0 2 35 -13.2 9.6 821.5 108, 109, 110
822.0 2 34 -15.3 9.6 790.7 105, 106, 107
873.9 2 33 -5.1 9.6 836.9 102, 103, 104
926.0 2 32 -2.8 9.6 807.4 99, 100, 101
978.0 2 31 -9.7 9.6 825.6 96, 97, 98
1030.0 2 30 -13.0 9.6 816.8 93, 94, 95
1082.0 2 29 -18.1 9.6 822.8 90, 91, 92
1134.1 2 28 28.9 9.6 810.5 87, 88, 89
1183.0 2 27 42.2 9.5 814.6 84, 85, 86
1232.1 2 26 34.4 9.6 818.6 81, 82, 83
1280.0 2 25 36.0 9.6 827.1 77, 78, 79, 80
1312.9 1 24 51.9 9.6 823.8 76
1328.0 2 24 25.3 9.6 811.7 74, 75, 76
1354.0 2 23 24.9 9.6 813.5 71, 72, 73
1398.0 2 22 25.4 9.6 816.1 68, 69, 70
1433.0 2 21 25.3 9.5 784.4 65, 66, 67
1466.9 2 20 24.8 9.6 817.5 62, 63, 64
1503.0 2 19 28.5 9.5 794.9 59, 60, 61
1539.0 2 18 24.8 9.5 802.8 56, 57, 58
1579.9 2 17 24.9 9.5 784.4 53, 54, 55
1621.0 2 16 25.7 9.5 788.1 50, 51, 52
1662.0 2 15 17.2 9.6 790.2 47, 48, 49
1702.0 2 14 9.6 9.5 777.9 44, 45, 46
1752.0 2 13 10.0 9.3 764.0 41, 42, 43

Shot Summary Listing (2/2)

Measured Tool Stack Relative Caliper Anchoring
Shot number
Depth [m] Number Number Bearing [deg] [in] force [kg]
1761.0 2 12 0.2 10.5 774.9 38, 39, 40
1801.0 2 11 -6.8 9.6 758.6 35, 36, 37
1871.0 2 10 177.0 9.3 763.2 32, 33, 34
1892.0 2 9 178.4 6.6 435.6 28, 29, 31

Reference Log First Pass Tie in Log
Log correlated to DSI-HRLA-TLD-MCFL Log dated 12th April 2008 .
Log depth corrected - 1.0 m after correlation … no depth correction to applied on

final processing


25. APPENDIX L: PETROPHYSICAL INTERPRETATION

Petro-Canada
Binckhorstlaan 410
2516 BL The Hague
The Netherlands MEMORANDUM
E-mail: assia.belhaouas@petro-canada.com
To: Rob Newbould, Mike Eynon and Well file

From: Assia Belhaouas Date: 19th August 2008
Subject: P11-06 Exploration Well Petrophysical Evaluation
Introduction
Dutch sector of the North Sea on the Van Ghent prospect. The Van Ghent structure is
located approx. 55 km northwest of The Hague. The Volpriehausen reservoir sequence
was drilled from 1702m to 1801m MDBRT at the crestal position of the Van Ghent
prospect.
The well was drilled vertically with a maximum inclination of 2 degrees and had a 30”, 13
3/8” and 9 5/8” casing and 7” liner scheme.
Data Availability and Data Quality
Across the 8½ in hole section Baker Hughes Inteq LWD Gamma-ray and Resistivity was
recorded, providing good quality real-time and memory data.
At TD, the following wireline logs were acquired:
Run-1: PEX-HRLA-DSI-HNGS-SP
Run-2: FMI-GPIT-GR
Run-3: MDT-GR (for Pressures and Samples)
Run-4: VSI
Run-5: MSCT-GR
Run-6: CBL-GR
The caliper indicates that the borehole was in fairly good condition throughout the reservoir
section, except just below the casing shoe at the top of the Volpriehausen where the
density curve was reconstructed from Sonic. The density correction curve is otherwise well
within tolerance, as is all the other calibration data.
The MDT tool was configured with a standard probe and a Quick-silver probe. The
Quicksilver probe was used to optimise sampling time and reduce contamination of the
down-hole fluid samples.
The MDT pretests give three clear fluid gradients, indicating a gas column, an oil leg and a
water leg in the Volpriehausen. The fluid samples were taken at the following depths:
• two water samples at 1797.5m

• two water samples at 1871.4m
• six gas samples at 1733.2m
• four oil samples at 1754.5m
• two oil samples at 1755.2m
• two drilling mud sample were also collected.
Interpretation
The entire Volpriehausen reservoir sequence was drilled from 1,702m to 1,801m MDBRT
at the crestal position of the Van Ghent prospect, final TD was at 1,892m (1,852m
TVDSS), 21m into the Hewett Formation. Top reservoir was recorded 12m deep to
prognosis and top Lower Buntsandstein was recorded 2m shallow to prognosed.
The same approach has been applied to evaluate P11-06 as used in previous wells,
DeRuyter P11-03 and Van Brakel P10-05.
The interpretation was carried out using the software package “Interactive Petrophysics”
(IP), applying a sand/shale model. All relevant input parameter are summarised in Table 1.
Shale Volume was determined from the minimum of Gamma Ray and Density Neutron
techniques.
Porosity was computed using the Density Neutron crossplot method in the top section of
Volpriehausen (1702 – 1732 m), and the Density method in the remaining Volpriehausen
interval as well as the Bunter. Where no Density or Neutron data was available, in the
Vlieland and the Hewitt, the sonic Wyllie equation was used. Porosity data was calibrated
to sidewall core porosity.
Archie equation was used to estimate water saturation. The deepest laterolog resistivity
RLA5 was used for true resistivity Rt.
Formation water salinity (ca. 110,000 ppm NaCl equ.) was adopted from studies performed
in the offset well, P11-03, and confirmed with a Pickett plot in the Hewett water-leg and
from the MDT water samples taken in the well. Electrical parameters “m” and “n” were
derived from SCAL in well P10-05.
Formation Vcl Phie Sw Rt Rw m n

@ 25 deg. C
Volpriehausen Minimum GR - N/D - Archie RLA5 0.064 1.843 1.913
N/D Density
Table 1: Evaluation parameters
A new saturation height function was derived from the Van Ghent data and was used to
compute an Archie independent water saturation.
SWHT = 1-((1-(l*EXP (m*Phie))*EXP(-1*(b/(Ht+d))^c))
Ht = Height above FWL

l = -9.858
m = 4.2032
b = 28.14889
c = 6.359847
d = 30
A new porosity-permeability transform has been determined using P10-05 core analysis
and P11-06 sidewall core analysis data, as shown in Figure 1
Log(Kh) = -3.5458 + 22.05 * (Phie)
Results
The evaluation confirms that the well penetrated a gas leg, an oil leg and a water bearing
Volpriehausen sandstone. The MDT pressure analysis plot (Figure 2) shows a 50m gas
column and a 11.5m oil column, both confirmed by analysis of fluid samples taken with the
MDT tool. The PVT analysis on the gas sample measured a gas density of 0.1464 g/cc
which corresponds to a gradient of 0.01436 bar/m. The measured oil density was 0.6585
g/cc corresponding to a gradient of 0.0646 bar/m. The specific gravity of the water was
1.092 at normal conditions.
The Gas Oil contact, as indicated by the MDT pressure data is at 1711.4m SS (1751.8m
MD). The free water level (FWL) derived from the MDT gradient plot is at 1723.0m SS
(1763.4m MD). The FWL indicated by the pressure data is in good agreement with the
calculated Rxo curve indicating non moveable hydrocarbon below 1723m SS.
The step change of 1.1 Bars in pressure between the Hewett and the Volpriehausen water
leg is possibly due to pressure depletion from the De-Ruyter production.
Below the FWL we see a 22 m interval of residual hydrocarbon, the water saturation in this
zone averages about 70%, this could be interpreted as a possible paleo OWC.
Net Sand and Net Pay were defined through cut-offs. The porosity cut-off is based on the
core porosity-permeability cross-plot and set to 10.5%. The results are summarised in
Table 2, and the CPI results plots are shown in Figure 4 and 5.
Zone Name Top Base Gross Net N/G Av Pay Av Av Av

Phi Phi Sw Kh
m MD m MD m MD m MD % % m MD % % mD
Volpriehausen 1701.9 1800.8 98.9 98.1 99.2 26.6 60.5 26.6 31.5 705
Gas-leg 1701.9 1751.8 49.9 49.3 98.7 27.0 49.3 27.0 27.1 842
Oil-leg 1751.8 1763.4 11.6 11.6 100 24.9 11.2 24.8 52.5 108
D
Water-leg 1763 1800.8 37.4 37.3 99.6 25.5 --
t
Table 2: Summary of results for P11-06
P11-06 and P10-05 Core Porosity vs Core Permeability Crossplot

10000.
1000.
Core Permeability (mD)
100. Only the data

within the
polygon was
used to define
10. the permeability
transform
1.
0.1
0. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 30. 35. 40. 45. 50.
Core Porosity (dec)
Figure 1: Core Porosity vs. Permeability Cross-plot:

Log(core:KAH) = -3.5458 + 22.05 * (core:CPOR)
Hewett
Pressure data colour coded by mobility
Figure 2: P11-06 MDT Pressure Gradient Plot

Figure 3: De-Ruyter Regional MDT Pressure Plot
Figure 4: P11-06 CPI of the Volpriehausen
Figure 5: P11-06 CPI

26. APPENDIX M: POST WELL STUDIES – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
26.1 SWC Analyses – Conventional and Petrographic Analyses (Corex)
A total of 40 rotary sidewall cores were recovered from well P11-06. The cores were sent
to Corex (UK) Ltd for analysis. Each core was cleaned and dried under controlled
conditions before being analysed conventionally for porosity, permeability and grain
density. The results are tabulated below.
Gas Permeability Grain

Sidewall Depth @ 400 psig Porosity Density
Sample (m) (mD) (%) (g/cc)
50 1708.00 680. 33.7 2.65
16 1709.25 0.912 7.2 2.69
49 1713.60 Frac 31.5 2.67
15 1716.00 376. 32.7 2.64
48 1718.60 448. 31.1 2.66
14 1720.40 145. 28.1 2.65
30 1721.20 128. 33.8 2.65
47 1723.00 1503. 33.1 2.66
13 1724.30 51.7 25.4 2.66
29 1725.40 211. 27.3 2.67
46 1726.70 17.3 25.2 2.67
11 1733.10 369. 26.7 2.64
44 1734.30 666. 29.8 2.65
10 1738.80 807. 28.5 2.66
43 1739.10 809. 28.5 2.65
25 1741.00 964. 30.5 2.64
9 1742.50 188. 27.2 2.65
42 1744.00 15.7 21.7 2.64
24 1745.00 53.4 23.8 2.66
8 1746.20 43.2 23.6 2.65
41 1747.50 4.561 22.3 2.66
23 1750.00 38.4 23.7 2.65
7 1751.00 86.4 24.8 2.65
40 1753.00 71.3 25.7 2.66
6 1757.40 66.3 28.1 2.67
39 1758.30 39.6 25.4 2.66
21 1760.80 55.1 28.1 2.66
5 1763.30 435. 30.0 2.67
38 1764.50 0.552 22.4 2.69
20 1766.10 272. 26.4 2.72

4 1767.70 99.1 26.4 2.68

3 1776.40 44.4 25.5 2.66
18 1786.00 47.2 27.3 2.68
2 1792.30 55.0 28.0 2.65
35 1797.30 162. 31.8 2.65
1 1800.00 35.9 32.3 2.65
33 1878.60 397. 24.9 2.66
Sidewall core petrography was carried out by Corex (UK) Limited. 16 of the rotary
sidewall cores were selected for petrographic analysis. A summary of the samples and
analysis performed is provided below.

Thin Section
Well Sample Depth (m) CCA Geochem SEM XRD
(+point count)
P11-06 50 1708 x
P11-06 16 1709.25 x x x x
P11-06 49 1713.6 x
P11-06 15 1716 x
P11-06 48 1718.6 x
P11-06 14 1720.4 x x x x
P11-06 30 1721.2 x
P11-06 47 1723 x x x x
P11-06 13 1724.3 x
P11-06 29 1725.4 x x
P11-06 46 1726.7 x
P11-06 27 1732.25 x
P11-06 11 1733.1 x
P11-06 44 1734.3 x
P11-06 10 1738.8 x x x x
P11-06 43 1739.1 x
P11-06 25 1741 x
P11-06 9 1742.5 x
P11-06 42 1744 x
P11-06 24 1745 x
P11-06 8 1746.2 x
P11-06 41 1747.5 x x x x
P11-06 23 1750 x
P11-06 7 1751 x x x x
P11-06 40 1753 x
P11-06 6 1757.4 x x x x
P11-06 39 1758.3 x
P11-06 21 1760.8 x x x x
P11-06 5 1763.3 x
P11-06 38 1764.5 x x x x
P11-06 20 1766.1 x
P11-06 4 1767.7 x
P11-06 37 1769.8 x
P11-06 3 1776.4 x x x x
P11-06 36 1782.5 x
P11-06 18 1786 x x x x
P11-06 2 1792.3 x x x x
P11-06 35 1797.3 x x x x
P11-06 1 1800 x x
P11-06 33 1878.6 x x
The full analysis and results are contained in Corex (UK) Limited Petrographic Report,
Exploration Well P11-06, Job No 2008-047A.

26.2 PVT Formation Fluid Analyses
Core Lab were contracted to carry out analyses on the samples taken from the well. A full
API ion analysis, organic acid analysis, sulphate analysis and dissolved CO2 analysis
was performed on the water samples. Compositional analysis from cryogenic distillation
and PVT analysis (constant composition expansion) was performed on the gas samples.
Results are in the separate report Core Lab; Reservoir Fluid Study for Petro-Canada B.V.
Well P11-06 RFLA 20080138.
26.3 Geochemistry
I.G.I (Integrate Geochemical Interpretation Ltd) were contracted to provide analysis and
interpretation of the following data acquired in well P11-06:
• Sidewall cores from 1732.5m (gas leg), 1769.8m and 1782.5m (water leg)
• MDT Gas Sample
• MDT Oil sample
The objectives of the geochemical analysis were to:

• Extract geochemical data from the reservoir of P11-06 for a comparison with oils
gasses and stains analysed in the De Ruyter, Van Nes and Van Brakel Fields.
• Establish oil /oil and gas / gas correlations with offset Fields
• Establish the relationship if any between the oil and the gas in the P11-06
reservoir
• Identify the source of the oil and gas.
• Integrate the results into the existing database and propose an updated model for
the history of oil and gas charging in the area.
At the time of writing this report the geochemical analysis was still ongoing.

26.4 Borehole Seismic Processing
BOREHOLE SEISMIC PROCESSING REPORT. WELL : P11-06, PETRO-CANADA

NETHERLANDS B.V. Upwave Technology, 15th April 2008
Summary
Rig source high density checkshot data were recorded by Schlumberger on 15th April
2008 at the P11-06 Van Ghent well for Petro-Canada Netherlands B.V. and partners.
The objectives of the survey were to provide a detailed time-depth relationship at the well
location and to generate synthetic seismogram responses from the supplied logs. The
checkshot data were acquired with a dual tool and sufficient levels were acquired to
enable successful VSP processing. The VSP has provided a high frequency multiple-free
image at the reservoir interval and reflectivity beneath TD.
The rig source data have a maximum bandwidth of 5-90Hz. Maximum bandwidth 5-90Hz
and seismic match 5-50Hz zero phase filters have been applied to the VSP data.
Processed 5-90Hz and 5-50Hz zero phase VSP and synthetic seismogram data have
been integrated with inline 6820 and crossline 755 seismic data. The tie between the
VSP, synthetic seismogram and seismic data is very good with a zero shift.
Discussion of Results
The P11-06 Van Ghent well is located at 52 21’ 46.964”N 03 24’ 27.645”E. The
borehole was essentially vertical, with a maximum deviation of 1.58 degrees at 1164m
MDKB.
Rig source high density checkshot data were recorded by Schlumberger on 15th April
2008 using a dual level non-gimballed VSI accelerometer array with 15.1m receiver
separation. 64 levels were recorded at irregular spacing between 1892.0 and 503.9m
MDKB. The data quality was good, although the levels above 700m MDKB are affected
by casing arrival interference and have been omitted from the VSP processing. Reliable
first arrival times have been computed for these levels from the recorded horizontal
component data.

The raw accelerometer data were processed by Upwave Limited to produce time-depth
listings and P-wave reflection images. The processed VSP data have been output at a
maximum bandwidth of 5-90Hz zero phase and at a seismic match 5-50Hz zero phase
bandwidth. Figures 1.3 & 1.4 show the VSP enhanced deconvolved upgoing wavefields
together with the VSP corridor stacks and synthetic seismograms at 5-90Hz and 5-50Hz
respectively. The tie between the synthetic seismogram and VSP data is very good.
The processed 5-90Hz and 5-50Hz VSP corridor stacks have been inserted in the
seismic inline 6820 and crossline 755 data. The tie with the seismic data is good with a
zero shift.
Velocity log calibration and synthetic seismograms have been computed using the
corrected vertical times from the VSP data and the available log data after edit. The
resultant acoustic impedance log is displayed together with the seismic match bandwidth
synthetic seismogram, VSP corridor stack and inline 6820 and crossline 755 seismic
data. The tie between the synthetic seismogram, VSP corridor stack and seismic data is
good.

NLOG GS PUB 1580 VGEXP-INT3-GG-RPT-0001.00 P11-06 Geological FWR

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

NLOG GS PUB 1580 VGEXP-INT3-GG-RPT-0001.00 P11-06 Geological FWR

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Document Title P11-06 GEOLOGICAL FINAL WELL REPORT

Document Number VGEXP-INT3-GG-RPT-0001.00

Document / Rev No: VGEXP-INT3-GG-RPT-0001.00

P11-06 GEOLOGICAL FINAL WELL REPORT Revision Date: February 2009

3. RECORD OF CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS ISSUE .................................................5

4. GENERAL WELL INFORMATION .............................................................................6

5. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................7

6.1 Geological Setting and prognosis..............................................................................9

7. WELL OPERATIONS ...............................................................................................17

7.1 Drilling Operations Overview...................................................................................17

8.1 Formation Tops .......................................................................................................29

9. HYDROCARBON INDICATIONS .............................................................................43

9.1 Oil shows.................................................................................................................43

10. PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE ENVIRONMENT ..............................................48

Document / Rev No: VGEXP-INT3-GG-RPT-0001.00

P11-06 GEOLOGICAL FINAL WELL REPORT Revision Date: February 2009

10.1 Formation pressure .................................................................................................48

11. WELL DATA ACQUISITION SERVICES..................................................................51

11.1 Mudlogging Services ...............................................................................................51

12. GEOLOGICAL SAMPLES ........................................................................................68

12.1 Drill Cuttings ............................................................................................................68

13. FIGURES ..................................................................................................................74

13.1 Figure 1: Location Map...........................................................................................74

14. APPENDIX A: CUTTINGS DESCRIPTION TABLE ................................................75

15. APPENDIX B: SAMPLE MANIFESTS.....................................................................76

16. APPENDIX C: DRILL GAS PIXLER PLOTS (INTERNATIONAL LOGGING) ........77

17. APPENDIX D: DIRECTIONAL SURVEY LISTING (BAKER HUGHES INTEQ) .....79

18. APPENDIX E: LWD REPORT (BAKER HUGHES INTEQ).....................................80

19. APPENDIX F: FORMATION PRESSURE SUMMARY (RUN 2B)...........................81

20. APPENDIX G: FORMATION SAMPLING SUMMARY (RUNS 2D & 2F)................82

21. APPENDIX H: WIRELINE LOGGING SUMMARY (RUN 1A) .................................83

Document / Rev No: VGEXP-INT3-GG-RPT-0001.00

P11-06 GEOLOGICAL FINAL WELL REPORT Revision Date: February 2009

22. APPENDIX I: WIRELINE QC REPORT (GAIA EARTH SCIENCES)......................84

23. APPENDIX J: BOREHOLE SEISMIC QC REPORT, RUN 2D (RPS ENERGY) .....85

24. APPENDIX K: VELOCITY SURVEY LISTING (SCHLUMBERGER) ......................86

25. APPENDIX L: PETROPHYSICAL INTERPRETATION...........................................87

26. APPENDIX M: POST WELL STUDIES – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................88

26.1 SWC Analyses – Conventional and Petrographic Analyses (Corex) ......................88

REVISION STATUS APPROVAL

Document / Rev No: VGEXP-INT3-GG-RPT-0001.00

P11-06 GEOLOGICAL FINAL WELL REPORT Revision Date: February 2009

4. GENERAL WELL INFORMATION

Block : P11b, Dutch Sector of Southern North Sea

Document / Rev No: VGEXP-INT3-GG-RPT-0001.00

P11-06 GEOLOGICAL FINAL WELL REPORT Revision Date: February 2009

• Run #2A – DSI-HRLA-TLD-MCFL-CAL-CNL-HNGS-ACTS-SP-ECRD

Document / Rev No: VGEXP-INT3-GG-RPT-0001.00

P11-06 GEOLOGICAL FINAL WELL REPORT Revision Date: February 2009

• Run #2H – CBL-VDL-GR-CCL

The Hewett Formation was entirely water bearing.

Document / Rev No: VGEXP-INT3-GG-RPT-0001.00

P11-06 GEOLOGICAL FINAL WELL REPORT Revision Date: February 2009

6.1 Geological Setting and prognosis

Document / Rev No: VGEXP-INT3-GG-RPT-0001.00

P11-06 GEOLOGICAL FINAL WELL REPORT Revision Date: February 2009

6.2 Well Objectives

The objectives of well P11-06 pre-drill are summarised as:

3. If the reservoir is hydrocarbon bearing obtain sufficient information in order to evaluate

• obtain downhole pressure measurements and temperatures;

• establish fluid contacts;

• acquire rotary sidewall cores to help in the characterisation of the Volpriehausen

Document / Rev No: VGEXP-INT3-GG-RPT-0001.00