Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

THE LOST RIVERS AND LAKES OF PAMPANGA, Abacan River- Angeles to Mexico

TARLAC, AND BULACAN - Turns towards Minalin and Sto.


Tomas
“pampang”- riverbank
“Kapampangan”- people from the riverbanks Pasig-Potrero River and Porac-Gumain River-
head towards Guagua River Basin
Ancient lakes and swamps:
Sapang Matulid- also known as San Fernando
 PINAC DE CANDABA
River or Betis River
- Candaba, San Luis, San Simon, San
Rafael, San Ildefonso, San Miguel de Guagua-Pasak River- known as Dalan Bapor
Mayumu, Balioag, Cabiao
 PINAC DE HAGONOY  1762-64 British Occupation, Spaniards
escaped from Manila to Bacolor
- Apalit, Calumpit, Hagonoy, Pulilan,
Paombong, Plaridel, Malolos through the Guagua-Pasak River
- Where Angat River and Pampanga  1899- Spaniards retreating from
River meet via Bagbag River Aguinaldo’s Revolutioinary Army
boarded ships that took them to Manila
 PINAC DE SAN ANTONIO
- located north of Mt. Arayat in via Guagua-Pasak River
Nueva Ecija “Palapawan”- place in Macabebe which means
 CANAREM LAKE place where water overflows
- Located in Victoria, Tarlac
- Now a wetland and bird sanctuary “Tacasan”- place where water escapes
- Formerly known as Catanglaran Sapang Pari- the priest’s creek
(where Tanglad plants grew
abundantly) Our ancestors knew the cycle of flood and built
planting and harvesting seasons accordingly.
These 4 lakes and swamps are located in a
depressed area that runs from Nueva Vizcaya - Welcomed flood with festivals such
down to Manila Bay known as PAMPANGA as Libad (fluvial parade)
RIVER BASIN
- Where 2 big rivers Rio Grande and
Rio Chico meet

Bulacan- direction of flood

Arnedo Dike – built on the Pampanga side of


Pampanga River
- Keeps overflow water from
spreading in San Fernando

GUAGUA RIVER BASIN- large depressed area


where all rivers emanating from Mt. Pinatubo
collect
- Creates a second great river, the
Guagua-Pasak River
HUMAN FLOURISHING IN SCIENCE AND ● Stockpiling
TECHNOLOGY QUESTIONING AS THE PIETY OF THOUGHT
Human person- bearer and beneficiary of ● Piety- obedience and submission
science and technology It is when we start questioning that we submit
ourselves to our thoughts.
Science and technology- must be taken as a
part of human life that merits reflective and ENFRAMING: WAY OF REVEALING IN MODERN
meditative thinking TECHNOLOGY
TECHNOLOGY AS A MODE OF REVEALING The way of revealing in modern technology is an
enframing
The Question of Technology- Martin Heidegger
Enframing that challenges forth and sets upon
- Technology is a means to an end
nature is a way of looking at reality
(Instrumental)
- Technology is a human activity ● Poiesis is concealed in enframing as
(Anthropological) nature is viewed as an orderable and
Heidegger urged people to envision technology calculable system of information
as a mode of revealing.
Calculative Thinking- one orders and puts a
- Technology is a way of bringing forth
system to nature so it can be understood better
and controlled
ANCIENT GREEK CONCEPTS (according to
Meditative Thinking- one lets nature reveal
Heidegger)
itself without forcing it
● Aletheia- unhiddenness or disclosure
“But where danger is, grows the saving power
● Poiesis- bringing forth
also.” - Holderlin
● Techne- skill, art, or craft
Technology is a poiesis that discloses or reveals 4 CAUSES:
the truth
● Causa materialis- the matter out of
MODERN TECHNOLOGY which a thing is made
● Causa formalis- the form, shape into
- challenging forth since it is very
which the material enters
aggressive in its activity
● Causa finalis- the end or reason it is
- brings about a “setting upon” of the
made
land
● Causa efficiens- brings about the effect
- Ex: Mining- extracting minerals from
earth
With modern technology, revealing never Aition- Greek experience of cause
comes to an end.
- indebtedness; responsible for bringing
Heidegger described modern tech as: forth
- The Greeks revere the sun because they
● Age of Switches
are indebted to it not because it is the
● Standing Reserve- sees resources as a
cause of energy
way to fulfill man’s needs
HUMAN FLOURISHING AS REFLECTED IN THE MAGICIAN’S TWIN
PROGRESS AND DEVELOPMENT
1st half of the 21st century- 3 prophetic writers
Forget developing poor countries, it’s time to warned us about the dark side of scientific and
de-develop rich countries by Jason Hickel technological progress

 UN’s new Sustainable Development  G.K. Chesterton


Goals (SDGs)  George Orwell
- Main objective is to eradicate poverty  C.S. Lewis
by 2030
- Main strategy for eradicating poverty is C. S. Lewis- best known for his Narnia stories
growth - had interest in growing power of
scientism
Growth- main object of development for the - critic of scientism
past 70 years - compared science to something
ancient: magic
1980- global economy has grown by 380%
- Number of people living in poverty
increased by more than 1.1 billion Scientism is the idea that the methods of natural
Global hectares- standardized unit that science should be the bar by which every other
measures resource use and waste intellectual discipline must be held.

Ghana and Guatemala- consumes 1.8 global Pursue science to have power over the world and
hectares per person power over the people

US and Canada- 8 hectares Science and Magic

Europeans- 4.7 hectares 3 ways in which they are similar:

Peter Edwards- instead of pushing poor 1. Science as religion - Ability to function as


countries to “catch up” with rich ones, we religion
should think of ways to get rich countries to
“catch down” Belief of something higher than ourselves

US- life expectancy of 79 years; GDP of $53,000 Science can be an alternative religion

Cuba- GDP of only $6000 and consumption of Cosmic struggle of evolution of HG Wells
1.9 global hectares
People offer science as their religion-it is what
Similar claims by Peru, Ecuador, Honduras, gives their life meaning
Nicaragua, Tunisia
2. Science as credulity – encouragement of lack
Costa Rica- sustain one of the highest happiness of skepticism
indicators and per capita income ¼ that of the
US In the modern world, people will believe almost
anything if it’s dressed up in the name of
70% of people in middle- and high-income science.
countries- believe that overconsumption is
putting our planet at risk
Examples according to Lewis: THE GOOD LIFE

 Freudianism Aristotle- Greek philosopher (natural


 Evolutionism – idea that matter could philosophy to logic and political theory)
magically transform itself into complex Nicomachean Ethics:
and conscious living things through a
blind and unguided process  All human activities aim at some good
 Good- that at which all things aim

3. Science as power- quest for power Good life- characterized by happiness that
springs from living and doing well
Much of modern science was actually devoted
Eudaimonia- ancient Greek concept of living
towards power over the world
well and doing well
Power of science was its greatest virtue
- “eu”- good; “daimon”- spirit
Tendency to want to control things
Happiness- ultimate end of human action which
people pursue for its own sake
- Defines a good life
Lewis thought that modern science was far - Not the kind that comes from sensate
more dangerous than magic because magic pleasure
failed - Comes from living a life of virtue, a life
of excellence
- Wrote a book entitled “That Hideous
Strength” Virtuous actions require discipline and practice

By the end of his life, he was worrying about the Good life- marked by happiness brought about
rise of what he called as Scientocracy- gov’t and by virtuous human actions
society based on the claims of modern science Virtue- plays a significant role in living and
attainment of a good life
Lewis did not deny that scientific expertise
- The constant practice of good
might be necessary for good public policy in
- The excellence of character
many areas but he insisted that science alone
was not sufficient
2 TYPES OF VIRTUE
Understand the limits of science  Intellectual virtue
 Moral Virtue

Вам также может понравиться