Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
By Matt Kramer
This work evolved from the question “what can we do to make the world a
better place?” Additional questions – what makes it worse? Are the
destructive factors applied consciously or unconsciously? How much of the
problem results from acts, policies or decisions generated with the intention
or knowledge that someone will suffer as a consequence?
I do believe that most people are good. I used to believe that within even the
most evil was a spark of goodness that could be tapped to create a
transformation from evil to good. Now, older and wiser, I see that often what
appears to us to be the greatest evil is truly not evil in the minds of those
who actions cause harm to others. In their minds, they are the victims; those
they hurt asked for it: “You made me do it.”
Below is a cobbling of ideas – I have yet to organize them into a cohesive and
accessible order. It is easy for me to go in any number of directions in
expanding this theory – that the psychological makeup of a few (4%
according to Martha Stout – The Sociopath Next Door) has had a hugely
destructive impact upon humanity. I do not believe that violence is man’s
default behavior. I believe that with some study, we can create new ways to
understand the nature of leadership, how the worst people are able to
become our leaders (in all arenas) and how to create the kind of change that
could transform society into a truly nurturing environment for all. At best,
such a change will take at least two or three generations – our human desire
for instant gratification is one of the obstacles to achieving that goal.
Matt
Preamble – I have been told that I lack a succinct theory describing the
paradigm resulting from the rule of predatory leaders. I’m starting with an
attempt to define the theory.
Those who do work to make a difference are divided into two camps. One
group is comprised of the predators and parasites who exploit the resources
and efforts of humanity without any regard to the consequences; the other is
defined by the work of those who seek to heal the damage and improve the
conditions within which we all live.
After reading her response, I went to Google and asked the question: What is a
theory?
With those thoughts in mind, I wrote this first section to serve as an introduction
to the theory of predatory leadership.
I also believe that such a theory can be used to create standards by which the
actions of such people (and the organizations they rule) can be publically
assessed and recognized for the damage they cause.
At this point, I call this a theory of Predatory Leadership. My theory is that many
people in positions of power were able to attain those positions because,
possessed with an abusive or sociopathic personality, a combination of
determination and drive, and exceptional expertise in exploiting and manipulating
human nature, they were able to out compete (or eliminate) any competition that
stood in the way of their goal.
One reason they prevail is that, as predators on their way up the ladder, they are
able to convince many of their followers that they are acting selflessly on their
behalf when, in reality, they see their followers and others as a resource to be
used, mined and exploited with truly no concern for their welfare. When they
obtain control of the army, the reins of the corporation, the top position in their
church or religion, etc., their position may be such that they have to maintain an
outer façade of concern, or they may control such powerful forces that they can
openly act on their agenda.
<>-<> A public lack of understanding of the nature and behavior of the abusive or
sociopathic mind. (As with squares and rectangles, I believe there are
commonalities and differences between abusers and sociopaths.)
<>-<> A desire on the part of the average person to want someone else to be in
charge, someone to take care of them, etc. As a result they are more open to
accepting the outright lies of their leaders. When a sociopath says to his
constituents, “Your problems are the fault of those ‘others’ and when I get rid of
them for you, your world will be all right”, enough people support and believe the
leader to the extent that dissenting voices are easily marginalized or eliminated.
Prologue
"It is too difficult too judge us . . . because what we did goes beyond
human imagination." Jean Hatzfeld (excerpt from an interview with a
perpetrator of the Rwandan genocide)
* * *
There are wonderful things happening in the world today. All over the
planet, thousands, if not millions of people are making bold and
powerful efforts to end war, eliminate disease and famine, and, in
general, make the world a better place for everybody. However, in
addition to the resistance experienced from those entrenched in the
status quo, the idealists face silent and relentless efforts to
marginalize their work. I believe, if it were not for these obstacles,
both visible and invisible, the majority of humanity's challenges could
be conquered within a very short time.
Many feel that it is inevitable that people in power will succumb to the
exploitive opportunities of their position (power corrupts . . .) and
when idealistic youth ask why such people are in power and why don't we
change, their wiser elders shrug their shoulders to say, "That's the way
it's always been and that's how it always will be."
I disagree.
============
by Matt Kramer
Next to plagues and natural disasters, corrupt leaders may be the
greatest contributors to past and present states of human misery. This
article begins to explore the historic and the current nature of
predatory leadership and its impact on humanity. The first step toward
creating effective change in the methods available to those who work
their way into positions of leadership is to understand how such people
think and act, and how they are able to attain the power they seek.
2. They were adept at confusing and camouflaging the issues to the point
that a fair resolution could not be reached .
For the most part, I support a generalization that "most people are
good." In 30 years as a business professional and world traveler, I have
had, at most, two incidents in which I encountered people who
intentionally wished me ill. In general I've found the vast majority of
human interactions to be positive experiences fueled by healthy
intentions.
. In their minds, they are the only victims. In their public trials,
Saddam Hussein and Slobodan Milosevic never acknowledged they were
responsible for causing harm to others; their major efforts in the
courts were to direct attention to how badly they, themselves, were
being treated.
. They make every effort to prove their actions are the fault of
somebody else.
Research shows that the brains of abused children and sociopaths are
physiologically different from those who were raised with the nurturance
each child deserves from birth. Sociopathic behavior indicates that they
lack the capacity for empathy and they appear to be incapable of taking
responsibility for the harm they have caused others. In my own
observations, within the abusers operates a mechanism that works
desperately to keep them from ever acknowledging they did anything
wrong. It's almost as if they are being controlled by a overpowering
subconscious belief that they will self destruct if they ever really
connect with either the nature of their submerged shame or fully grasped
the degree of pain and suffering they inflict upon others.
The source is complex, insidious and in many ways, well hidden. At the
same time, it is publically visible in a way that makes the horrible
acceptable. The consequences of war is sold to the public as a solution
because the other side, led by similar leaders selling the same
propaganda to their people, is making demons out of the first
population. In this way, the predatory leaders are partners in crime;
they need and use each other's pathologies to justify their own.
. Insurgents who plant bombs and the people who recruit and train them.
I will relate a brief story about a friend of mine who has the potential
to be a humane, compassionate and effective political leader. He was on
the ground floor of the national political arena and his friends and
colleagues had high hopes for him. But in his professional environment,
advancement in his field meant he had to compromise his conscience and
morals so thoroughly that he chose to drop out. He would ultimately be
replaced by someone who lacked similar conscience and was sufficiently
self serving that he could do the dirty work necessary to move up in the
organization.
This is one of the key reasons that we find ourselves with malevolent,
exploitive and murderous people in positions of power. While they may
not be proactively murderous, they are sufficiently bureaucratic in
mid-level positions to move through the ranks of the regime,
corporation, military unit or religious institution while serving their
own narcissistic agendas. The inhumane consequences of the bureaucratic
nature of managed health care are a current example.
In 1972 my friend took some time off from his studies at Harvard to work
on George McGovern's presidential campaign in New Hampshire. He did so
well that he was hired to run the state campaign for one of the Dakotas.
He told me about how excited he was to be meeting the top players in the
Democratic Party and that he could see making a career of this work. I
told him I looked forward to voting for him in 30 years.
A year later he dropped out. It wasn't that the competition was too
tough; he thrived on competition. The problem was that he was being
asked to do things that were too filthy for his conscience to bear. But
there were plenty of others waiting in line to do the dirty work, and
they would advance as a result. In this situation a potentially great
leader was marginalized while a sociopath forged ahead in the same
organization.
Over the centuries, the nature and path to power has become so infected
with the poison of sociopaths and the opportunists who gild their
pockets by serving the abusers in power, that a majority of the general
public accepts such abuse as inevitable and feels powerless to do
anything about it. This happens not just in the corporate, government,
military and political arenas, but also in educational, non- profit and
religious institutions. Most average folks complacently leave leadership
to others, and when this happens, ruthlessly competitive goal seekers
who will do anything to achieve their goals pervade all aspects of
culture and society.
For the sake of this discussion, from the Oxford English Dictionary, an
applicable definition of leadership is "a person or thing that leads."
Consider the position that all individuals are leaders in their own
lives by virtue of the fact that on conscious and subconscious levels,
they make leadership choices about every action they take. These choices
are as personal as selecting a school for their children or as
far-reaching as the decision to follow a leader who preaches harm to
others.
In the broad spectrum between the domestic abuser and the dictator of a
nation, they share a common pathological mindset. It is the lack of
understanding about how these sociopathic and abusive minds function
that enables such toxic entities to get into positions of power over and
over again.
3. Write one or more books on the myriad aspects of this subject (the
subject would progress geometrically if it could include contributions
from professionals in the fields of psychology, poly sci, sociology,
history, etc.)
***************************************************
Begin forwarded message: From: "Jack Glaser" Date: September 19, 2007
10:37:19 PDT To: "Matt Kramer" Subject: Re: Introduction to Predatory
Leaders
Thanks for sending your message. The idea is extremely interesting, but
it is so far outside my area of expertise that I'm afraid I can't be of
help. The social psychologist who is most prominent in the study of
leadership is Dean Simonton. You may wish to look into his work.
Jack Glaser
I feel this theory will be best served by sharing the development with
people with different areas of expertise: political scientists,
historians, psychologists, sociologists, etc. I do not wish to own this
idea; my desire is to help it make its way into public dialogue - if the
general population can learn to recognize the behavior patterns, maybe
they will start developing ways to protect themselves in their private
lives and find ways to redirect the predators away from access to
positions of power and control. I know this is tricky ground but I don't
know of any other efforts being made that address what I see as
humanity's primary problem.