BALANCE WORK FOUR LANING OF OBEDULLAGANJ TO

ITARSI SECTION OF NH-69 FROM KM. 2.800 TO KM. 8.300 AND

Project: FROM KM. 20.700 TO KM. 63.000 (DESIGN LENGTH 46.3 KM)
EXCLUDING KM. 8.300 TO 20.700 WILD LIFE AREA, IN THE
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (PACKAGE-1 / NH-69) ON EPC
MODE.

Client: NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

HYDROLOGY REPORT FOR MINOR BRIDGE AT

CH. 43+440
(C.A CH. 43+460

Document NHAI/NKC/KDCPL/NH69/HY/MNB/43+440 Prepared By: RK

No.:
Rev. No. R0 Checked By: VVV
Date: 09-03-2019 Approved By: SCK

Submitted To: NKC PROJECTS PVT. LTD

Consultant:
KHANNA DESIGNERS & CONSULTANTS PVT.LTD.
413, EROS City Square, Sector 49
Gurugram-122018, Haryana
M:9873858396 O: +91 124-4277519
 HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS FOR MINOR BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 43+440

PEAK DISCHARGE COMPUTATION BY DIFFERENT METHODS

Discharge (Cumecs)
Design
Existing C.A. By Area
Sr.No Bridge Name P&P chainage By Dicken By Rational Discharge
Chainage Chainage Velocity
method Method (Cumecs)
Method
1 Minor Bridge - 43+460 43+440 43.471 45.689 67.05 67.047

ABSTRACT OF HYDROLOGICAL AND HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS

Proposed chainage 43+440

Design discharge(cumecs) 67.047

Design HFL (m) 311.816

Velocity (m/s) 1.89

Average depth of water (m) 1.542

LBL (m) 310.274

Proposed FRL 314.514 FRL has to be increased = 0.327 mm

Calculated FRL 314.841

Vertical clearance required (m) 0.9

Hydraulic Adequacy Adequate

Proposed waterway (m) 20.1

Proposed Soffit Level 312.389

Silt Factor 0.5

Maximum Scour Level of Abutment (m) 306.114

Maximum Scour Level of Pier (m) 302.837

 DICKEN METHOD

Name of bridge/stream : Minor Bridge

Existing Chainage (km) -
C.A. Chainage (km) 43+460
P&P Chainage (Km) 43+440

Catchment Area, A 4.53 Sq.Km

Normal Annual Rainfall 122.59 cm (as per CGWB, Hoshangabad)
C 14 (As per Clause 4.2, IRC SP:13-2004)
Q CxA0.75
Q 43.47 Cumecs
Existing Chainage - -
C.A. Chainage - 43+460
Proposed Chainage - 43+440

FLOOD ESTIMATION

By Rational Method :

Area of catchment, A = 4.530 km2 = 453 Hectares

Length of longest stream, L = 3.000 km
The fall in level between source and site, H = 6.0 m
Co-efficient of Runoff, P = 0.40 sandy silt lightly covered
Point Rainfall Intensity (100year - 24hr) = 36 cm Plate 10, CWC Report upper Narmada and Tapi subzone 1(b)
Conversion factor (100year - 1hr) = 0.340 Fig. 10, CWC Report upper Narmada and Tapi subzone 1(b)
100 years, 1 hour Rainfall, Io = 12.24 cm / hr
f - curve = 0.99

Concentration time, tc

tc = ( 0.87 X L3 / H )0.385
= 1.6912 hours

Critical Intensity of Rainfall, Ic

Ic = Io (2 / tc+1)
= 9.10 cm / hr

Runoff, Qd

Qd = 0.028 x P x f x A x Ic
= 45.689 m3 / sec
 HYDRAULIC DESIGN REPORT FOR MINOR BRIDGE AT PROPOSED DESIGN CH: 43+440
Details of the bridge:
General details:
Span arrangements = 1 x 23 mxm
Clear Opening per span = 20.1 m
No of span = 1 nos.
Wearing coat = 65 mm
Carriageway width = 19 m
Overall width = 25 m
Drainage spout = As per Specifcations
Levels
HFL = 311.816
Proposed FRL = 314.514 m
Average depth of water = 1.54 m
Lowest Bed Level = 310.274 m
Structural Details
No. of Intermediate walls = 0 nos.
Type of deck arrangement = Girder
Depth of slab = 1.810 m
Cross slope = 2.0%
Design discharge:
a By area velocity method based on Manning's Formula
Calculation of longitudinal slope
Longitudinal slope has been calculated by fitting an equation to the longitudinal section of river bed to find bed slope by using
Microsoft Excel program.

x y
0 310.151
10 310.157
20 310.143
30 310.109
40 309.855
50 309.811
60 309.827
70 309.783
80 309.619
90 309.565
100 309.591
110 309.417
120 309.363
130 309.271
140 309.312 0.84 0.005993

Longitudinal Section of River

310.4

310.2 Series1

310

309.8 Linear (Series1)

309.6

309.4

309.2
y = -0.0069x + 310.22
309
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Hence, Longitudinal slope (s) = 0.005993

The longitudinal bed slope is 1 in 166.87
 Calculation of flood discharge at different cross sections
Flood discharge Q = A*V
where, A is area of cross section in sq m
V is the velocity of water in m/sec considered uniform throughout cross section
V= (1/n)*(S)1/2*(R)2/3
where, R is the hydraulic mean depth = A/P
S is the energy slope which may be taken as bed slope measured reasonably long stretch
n is co-efficient of roughness
P is wetted perimeter in m
i) Calculation of flood discharge through cross section at U/s stream of river
HFL = 311.816 m
Mean
Mean bed Depth of depth of Wetted
Distance Difference in level
Distance Bed level level b/w water water b/w Section at area "X Perimeter
"X" in X*Z b/w adjacent point X2 Y2 = SQRT
(m) (m) adjacent from HFL adjacent D". in Sqm
meter "Y" (in m)
pt. Z (m) to LBL pt. "D" in (X2+Y2)
meter
311.816 0 312.132
311.816 1.23 311.821 311.977 0.000 0.000 1.230 0.000 383.731 0.644 1.5129 0.415 0.000
311.816 5.01 310.523 311.172 0.644 0.322 3.780 1.217 1176.230 0.627 14.2884 0.393 3.832
311.816 9.54 310.568 310.546 1.270 0.957 4.530 4.336 1406.771 0.255 20.5209 0.065 4.537
311.816 13.92 310.013 310.291 1.526 1.398 4.380 6.123 1359.072 0.523 19.1844 0.274 4.411
311.816 15.22 309.521 309.767 2.049 1.787 1.300 2.323 402.697 0.134 1.69 0.018 1.307
311.816 17.14 309.745 309.633 2.183 2.116 1.920 4.063 594.495 -0.058 3.6864 0.003 1.921
311.816 19.62 309.638 309.692 2.124 2.154 2.480 5.341 768.035 -0.033 6.1504 0.001 2.480
311.816 21.44 309.811 309.725 2.092 2.108 1.820 3.837 563.699 -1.135 3.3124 1.288 2.145
311.816 26.08 311.908 310.860 0.956 1.524 4.640 7.071 1442.388 -0.956 21.5296 0.915 4.738

Total Area 34.312 Total Perimeter 25.370

 X*Z 6654.7307

Cross Section of Stream at U/S of Bridge Location

312.5

312

311.5

311

310.5

310

309.5

309
0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Discharge, Q = A*V Cumecs

where A = Area m2
V = Velocity m/sec
From Manning's formula we have V = (1/n) x S^(1/2) x R^(2/3)
where n = Rugosity coefficient
R = Hydraulic mean radius
S = Longitudinal Slope
Referring SP 13. Table 5.1 for section with winding, some pools and shoals, clean
n = 0.05
Hydraulic Mean Radius, R = Wetted Area/Wetted Perimeter
R = A/P
R = 1.352 m
Longitudinal Slope, S = 0.005992857
Velocity, V=(1/n)*(S)1/2*(R)2/3 = 1.89 m/sec
Discharge, Q= A*V = 64.97 Cumecs
ii) Calculation of flood discharge through cross section at bridge location
HFL = 311.816 m
Mean
Mean bed Depth of depth of Wetted
Distance Difference in level
Distance Bed level level b/w water water b/w Section at area "X 2 2
Perimeter
"X" in X*Z b/w adjacent point X Y
(m) (m) adjacent from HFL adjacent D". in Sqm = SQRT
meter "Y" (in m)
pt. Z (m) to LBL pt. "D" in (X2+Y2)
meter
311.816 0 312.156
311.816 4 310.454 311.305 0.511 0.255 4 1.022 1245.220 0.844 16 0.712 4.088
311.816 10 310.468 310.461 1.355 0.933 6 5.598 1862.766 0.008 36 0.000 6.000
311.816 13 310.438 310.453 1.363 1.359 3 4.077 931.359 0.205 9 0.042 3.007
311.816 17 310.058 310.248 1.568 1.465 4 5.862 1240.992 0.383 16 0.147 4.018
311.816 19 309.672 309.865 1.951 1.759 2 3.519 619.730 0.157 4 0.025 2.006
311.816 21 309.744 309.708 2.108 2.029 2 4.059 619.416 0.046 4 0.002 2.001
311.816 22 309.58 309.662 2.154 2.131 1 2.131 309.662 -0.024 1 0.001 1.000
311.816 25 309.793 309.687 2.129 2.142 3 6.425 929.060 -1.164 9 1.355 3.218
311.816 27 311.908 310.851 0.965 1.547 2 3.095 621.701 -0.965 4 0.932 2.221

Total Area 35.788 Total Perimeter 27.559

 X*Z 8379.906

Cross Section of Stream at Bridge Location

312.5

312

311.5

311

310.5

310

309.5

309
0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Discharge, Q = A*V Cumecs

where A = Area m2
V = Velocity m/sec
From Manning's formula we have V = (1/n) x S^(1/2) x R^(2/3)
where n = Rugosity coefficient
R = Hydraulic mean radius
S = Longitudinal Slope
Referring SP 13. Table 5.1 for section with winding, some pools and shoals, clean
n = 0.05
Hydraulic Mean Radius, R = Wetted Area/Wetted Perimeter
R = A/P
R = 1.298599828 m
Longitudinal Slope, S = 0.005992857
Velocity, V=(1/n)*(S)1/2*(R)2/3 = 1.84 m/sec
Discharge, Q= A*V = 65.95 Cumecs
Average depth of water in cross section at bridge location = m which is added to the weighted
average bed level at the upstream and downstream cross section to get the HFL at those sections
iii) Calculation of flood discharge through cross section at D/s of bridge location
HFL = 311.816 m
Mean
Mean bed Depth of depth of Wetted
Distance Difference in level
Distance Bed level level b/w water water b/w Section at area "X 2 2
Perimeter
"X" in X*Z b/w adjacent point X Y
(m) (m) adjacent from HFL adjacent D". in Sqm = SQRT
meter "Y" (in m)
pt. Z (m) to LBL pt. "D" in (X2+Y2)
meter
311.816 0 312.456
311.816 2.5 310.4356 311.446 0.370 0.185 2.5 0.463 778.615 1.121 6.25 1.256 2.740
311.816 8.6 310.215 310.325 1.491 0.930 6.1 5.676 1892.984 0.023 37.21 0.001 6.100
311.816 12.4 310.389 310.302 1.514 1.502 3.8 5.709 1179.148 0.052 14.44 0.003 3.800
311.816 18.1 310.111 310.250 1.566 1.540 5.7 8.778 1768.425 0.245 32.49 0.060 5.705
311.816 20.7 309.898 310.005 1.811 1.689 2.6 4.391 806.012 0.109 6.76 0.012 2.602
311.816 21.3 309.893 309.896 1.921 1.866 0.6 1.120 185.937 0.082 0.36 0.007 0.606
311.816 23.9 309.734 309.814 2.003 1.962 2.6 5.100 805.515 -0.036 6.76 0.001 2.600
311.816 25.5 309.964 309.849 1.967 1.985 1.6 3.176 495.758 -1.187 2.56 1.409 1.992
311.816 26.8 312.108 311.036 0.780 1.373 1.3 1.786 404.347 -0.780 1.69 0.608 1.516

Total Area 36.197 Total Perimeter 27.662

 X*Z 7538.13

Cross Section of Stream at D/s side of Bridge Location

313

312.5

312

311.5

311

310.5

310

309.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Discharge, Q = A*V Cumecs

where A = Area m2
V = Velocity m/sec
From Manning's formula we have V = (1/n) x S^(1/2) x R^(2/3)
where n = Rugosity coefficient
R = Hydraulic mean radius
S = Longitudinal Slope
Referring SP 13. Table 5.1 for section with winding, some pools and shoals, clean
n = 0.05
Hydraulic Mean Radius, R = Wetted Area/Wetted Perimeter
R = A/P
R = 1.309 m
Longitudinal Slope, S = 0.005992857
Velocity, V=(1/n)*(S)1/2*(R)2/3 = 1.85 m/sec
Discharge, Q= A*V = 67.05 Cumecs
Average depth of water in cross section at bridge location = m which is added to the weighted
average bed level at the upstream and downstream cross section to get the HFL at those sections
Discharge from Area velocity is taken as highest of all three discharges
Discharge, Q = 67.05 Cumecs
 CALCULATION OF SCOUR DEPTH FOR ABUTMENT

Existing Chainage (km) -

C.A. Chainage (km) 43+460
P&P Chainage (Km) 43+440
Name of stream/Bridge -
HFL (m) 311.816
Q (cumecs) 67.05
Silt Factor (Ksf or f) 0.50 (From Geotech report)
Qd=1.3xQ (As per IRC: 78-2014) 87.16
Effective Linear Waterway ( Le ) (m) 20.100
Regime Width, W' = 4.8 x (Qd^ 0.5) (m) 39.303

By IRC - 5
Db = Qd / MIN(W',Le) (cumecs/m) 4.336
Mean Depth of Scour (m) , Dsm = 1.34 x [(Db2/Ksf)^(1/3)] 4.490

RECOMMENDATIONS
Final Recommended mean scour depth, dsm = 4.490 m

Without Floor Protection Work

For Abutments
Maximum Scour Depth Below HFL, dsma = 1.27 * dsm = 5.702 m
HFL - dsma = 306.114 m
Maximum Scour Level = 306.114

A-1
 CALCULATION OF SCOUR DEPTH FOR PIER

Existing Chainage (km) -

C.A. Chainage (km) 43+460
P&P Chainage (Km) 43+440
Name of stream/Bridge -
HFL (m) 311.816
Q (cumecs) 67.047
Silt Factor (Ksf or f) 0.500 (From Geotech report)
Qd=1.3xQ (As per IRC: 78-2014) 87.161
Effective Linear Waterway ( Le ) (m) 20.100
Regime Width, W' = 4.8 x (Qd^ 0.5) (m) 39.303

By IRC - 5
Db = Qd / MIN(W',Le) (cumecs/m) 4.336
Mean Depth of Scour (m) , Dsm = 1.34 x [(Db2/Ksf)^(1/3)] 4.490

RECOMMENDATIONS
Final Recommended mean scour depth, dsm = 4.490 m

Without Floor Protection Work

For Piers
Maximum Scour Depth Below HFL, dsma = 2 * dsm = 8.979 m
HFL - dsma = 302.837
Maximum Scour Level = 302.837 m

A-1
Catchment Area Calculations

Catchment Area

Length of longest stream, L

Fall in level between source and site, H