Let a1 , a2 , a3 , . . . be a sequence of positive numbers. A series of the form a1 − a2 + a3 − a4 + a5 − a6 + . . . is said to be alternating because of the alternating sign pattern. (The series −a1 + a2 − a3 + . . . is also alternating, but it is more reassuring to start summation with a positive term.)
The partial sums Sn of an alternating series are evidently not monotone,
S1 > S2 , S2 < S3 , S3 > S4 , .... However, the subsequences of odd-numbered and of even-numbered partial sums S1 , S3 , S5 , . . . , S2 , S4 , S6 , . . . , may exhibit monotonic behavior. In fact, S2n+1 and S2n are monotone if and only if the original sequence a1 , a2 , a3 , . . . is monotone.
If convergent, an alternating series may not be absolutely convergent. For this
case one has a special test to detect convergence.
ALTERNATING SERIES TEST (Leibniz). If a1 , a2 , a3 , . . . is a sequence of
positive numbers monotonically decreasing to 0, then the series a1 − a2 + a3 − a4 + a5 − a6 + . . . converges.
It is not difficult to prove Leibniz’s test. Indeed, since
a1 ≥ a2 ≥ a3 ≥ . . . , we have a1 ≥ a1 − a2 + a3 ≥ a1 − a2 + a3 − a4 + a5 ≥ . . . a1 − a2 ≤ a1 − a2 + a3 − a4 ≤ a1 − a2 + a3 − a4 + a5 − a6 ≤ . . . , which means that S2n+1 is monotone decreasing and S2n is monotone increasing. Also S2n+1 = S2n + a2n+1 > S2n for every n, implying that both sequences are bounded and hence convergent. To see that S2n+1 and S2n converge to the same limit, observe that limn→∞ (S2n+1 − S2n ) = limn→∞ a2n+1 = 0. Proof finished.
A couple of conclusions follow from the above argument. First,
S2n < S < S2n+1 , where S is the sum of the series. And second, S − S2n < a2n+1 , S2n−1 − S < a2n . 2
EXAMPLE. The alternating harmonic series
∞ X (−1)n+1 n=1 n converges by Leibniz’s test. Indeed, the sign pattern is + − + − + . . . and, as n → ∞, the term n1 monotonically decreases to 0.
To illustrate the error estimate, observe for instance that
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 − + − + − + − + ≈ .746 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 is larger than the true sum but by no more than 0.1.