Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

HUMAN CAPITAL - represents the human factor in the POSSIBLE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT - Development Coaching is

organization. They are the source of combined intelligence, OBJECTIVES process in which leaders assist high-potential
skills and expertise that gives the organization a distinctive employees in developing certain competencies for
character. higher roles.

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT - is a system that ensures


the employees are clear on how they can contribute to the
accomplishment of the organization.

WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO LEARN ABOUT


PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT?
The Performance Management Cycle
1. It measures the competency of the organization.
A. Performance Planning and Commitment
2. Performance management articulates the job
- In this phase, organization objectives and
performance of an employee.
competencies are translated into individual performance plans.
D. Performance Rewards
- An important part in this process is ensuring the
alignment between organizational, group, and individual goals. - These are important in motivating and sustaining
- The clearer the goals are the organizational and performance.
group levels, the easier it is to align individual. - It is important to understand what rewards matter to
- It serves two purposes: facilitates achievement of employees in order to retain and engage them.
organizational objectives and highlights employees’ - It is important to look at the link between
contribution to the overall performance of the organization. performance and rewards.
B. Performance Review and Feedback - It is just as important to look at intrinsic rewards.
- Performance monitoring and assessment requires
a clear scoreboard as well as mechanism to track Measuring Job Performance
performance. It may be quantitatively (performance indicators)
or qualitatively (critical incidents). 1. Individual performance can be evaluated using
- Philippine context: Employees consider OBJECTIVE and SUBJECTIVE PERFORMANCE.
TOTAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AS performance and personhood one and the same. Hence, - Objective performance criteria are measures of job
ILLUSTRATED BY ATENEO CENTER FOR leaders must be sensitive to the feelings of their subordinate. performance that are tangible and can easily be quantified.
ORGANIZATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT - More personal approach would be more effective 2. Objective performance criteria are called TARGETS.
(ATENEO CORD) especially when giving feedback (Carbonnell, 2008). - Targets are objectives that define the quantifiable
- Sandwich Approach is the popular approach when result to be attained in terms of output, throughput, income,
giving feedback. sales, levels of service delivery, cost reduction, and reduction
C. Training and Development of rates. (Armstrong, 2006)
- Organizations need to provide mechanisms to 3. These targets are role specific, that is, a given target
ensure training and development. depends on what a particular job role has to do or achieve.
- The most common methods for training and (Armstrong, 2006)
development: - Example: A target for a sales representative can be
the amount of sales generated per month.
4. Following SMART mnemonic in writing clear
performance objectives or target.

S – Specific/stretching - clear, unambiguous, straightforward,


o Job Enrichment involves giving understandable, and challenging.
additional opportunities to high-potential employees in order
for them to gain experience and competencies outside their M – Measurable - quantity, quality, time, money
normal work.
A – Achievable - challenging but within the reach of
o Job Rotation involves exposing
competent and committed person.
individuals to different roles in order to expand their expertise.
o Coaching: R – Relevant - relevant to the objective of the organization
- Performance Coaching so that the goal of the individual is aligned to corporate
refers to assisting employees to perform better on goals.
their current role.
- Career Coaching refers to T – Time framed - to be completed within an agreed
assisting employees in identifying and preparing for timescale.
their desired careers or roles.
5. Subjective performance criteria are those aspects of performers and their performance is forced fit in a Roles in Performance Management
the job that cannot be easily seen and are often normal distribution.
behavioral in nature (Riggio, 2003) Top Executives
Individual methods – used in evaluating individual - Communicating the key role of performance
- Competencies can be considered as subjective performance. management in the organization
performance criteria as these represent knowledge, skills, and - Linking organizational goals with department/unit
behaviors. (Armstrong, 2006). - Graphic Rating Scales – use of a predetermined goals clearly
rating scale to rate performance on certain aspects - Setting clear performance expectations for the
Example: A sale representative can be relationship building of the job. Ideally, the rating scale should match the organization
skills. performance aspect being rated and the points in - Communicating progress in the achievements of
the rating scale should have descriptions. organizational goals
6. In using whether targets or competencies (or both), it - Role modelling of key values and competencies
is important that these performance measures are: Line Managers
- Setting performance goals and expectations with
• related to the strategic goals and measures that are
individual employees
organizationally significant and drive business
- Monitoring performance
performance;
• linked to the job roles and objectives of the - Checklists – rater uses a list of statements to - Giving feedback
assess an individual, with each statement - Looking out for employee development
individuals concerned;
corresponding to a numerical value. The rater - Linking performance with rewards
• focused on outputs, outcomes, inputs, and
would then choose statements that would describe Employees
behaviors that can be clearly defined and for which
the individual. The final rating would be the sum of - Reviewing for performance meetings
evidence can be available;
all the numerical values corresponding to the - Participating in setting performance goals
• verifiable, that is, information that will confirm the
statements chosen by the rater. - Evaluating peers if the performance management
extent to which expectations have been met is
available; - Narratives – written accounts of an individual’s system warrants it.
• precise as possible in accordance with the purpose performance of listing of the individual’s strengths Human Resources
and weaknesses. Using narratives gives the - Facilitating the competency building of line
of the measurement and the availability of date;
individual the freedom to describe their own managers and employees in performance
• a sound basis for feedback and action; and
performance; however, the drawback would be that management.
• comprehensive, covering all the key aspects of
some entries may not just reflect performance and - Evaluating the effectiveness of the performance
performance.
that the narrative may not be useful for work that management system.
7. Sources of performance ratings: needs quantification. Success Factors in Implementing a Performance
Management System
o Peer rating Problems and Pitfalls in Performance Appraisals
o Self- appraisal - Gaining commitment of line managers and employees by
o Subordinate rating - Getting performance data from several sources and clearly communicating the goals and benefits of the system.
o Customer rating choosing a method to rate performance are efforts to make - Involving line managers and employees in the development
the rating process more objective and less biased. Despite of the system.
Methods of Rating Performance these efforts, the raters’ judgment about performance may still - Equipping line managers with the competencies in goal-
be subject to distortions. These pitfalls include: setting, giving feedback, and coaching so that they can
Organizations have utilized various methods to assess implement the system.
performance. In general, these methods can be grouped - Leniency/Severity errors – occurs when the rater - Ensuring that the system is simple enough to implement by
into: has the tendency to either give high or low appraisals using technology and making the forms easy to understand
regardless of actual performance. and use.
Comparative methods – seek to compare and differentiate - Central tendency bias – occurs when the rater - Institutionalizing a culture wherein performance
various individuals’ performance has the tendency to give ratings that are in the middle of the management is not just considered an annual activity, but a
scale. cycle that should be performed all throughout the performance
- Rankings – ranking of individuals from best to - Halo effects – occurs when a rater gives a period.
worst performers. May not be effective if positive appraisal based on only one positive characteristic or Implications
performance is not evaluated objectively. action, and ignoring areas where the individual did not do too - Organization instills a performance-based culture, where
- Paired comparisons – an individual’s performance well. everyone in the organization see the alignment of personal
is compared with another individual’s performance. - Recency effects – occurs when the rating is goals to organization and unit goals.
May be unwieldy when the number of individuals mostly influenced by the most recent performance of the - Top management, supervisors, and staff are oriented and
becomes larger. individual, and not considering earlier performance. skilled at doing performance management.
- Forced distribution – assignment of workers to - Personal biases – occurs when other factors, - Organization members should see performance
predetermined categories, for example, from poor such as age, gender, race, and physical attributes influence management as a continuous activity of setting goals,
to outstanding performers, and organizing them the rating. monitoring performance, and giving feedback throughout the
along the normal curve. Problematic if there are performance period.
many people who are either poor or outstanding

Вам также может понравиться