0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
186 просмотров1 страница
This case discusses piercing the corporate veil between Tramat Mercantile, Inc. and its president David Ong regarding the sale of a tractor. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's ruling that Ong and Tramat were jointly and severally liable to pay the plaintiff. However, the Supreme Court reversed, finding no basis to pierce the corporate veil and hold Ong personally liable, as there was no evidence he acted in bad faith or committed an unlawful act that would disregard Tramat's separate corporate personality.
This case discusses piercing the corporate veil between Tramat Mercantile, Inc. and its president David Ong regarding the sale of a tractor. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's r…