Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Submitted by:
TANPOCO, Melizza Jaune
PAYAWAN, Bettina Aniag
AVILA, Sergei Kenrick P.
11H
Submitted to:
Ms. Cruzado
INTRODUCTION
Abstract
This research was conducted to study the effect of personality traits with the academic
achievement among students. The population was Grade 11 Accounting, Business Management
students, with a total of 131 students. However, only 40 randomly chosen students were chosen to
represent the entirety of the Accounting, Business Management students. The Instruments used
were Goldberg’s Big Five Personality Factors and student's General Average of the first semester
Academic year 2017-2018. The results have shown that only Openness to experience has a
criteria for educational quality in schools. This depends on the students’ ability to garner average, or
even higher, grades. However, teachers, parents, and school admins may be unaware of the
variables that affect these students ability to acquire average, or above average grades, such as their
personality factors. Students have distinctive personality factors that affect their way of thinking and
determine a students’ behaviour in an educational environment. If these factors are taken into
consideration by the teachers and school admins, the curriculum could be manipulated to give
emphasis on the factor that results into academic achievement in order to help students garner
socioeconomic status of one student, and their own mental abilities. Although, according to a
research conducted by Paunonen and Ashton (2001), there is a consistent role played by personality
There are five personality factors according to Lewis Goldberg that he identified as the
1. Extroversion: It is where one person gets his/her energy, and how this energy affects how
he/she acts around other people. In general, extroverts get energy from interacting with others,
while introverts get tired from interacting with others and prefer to be alone to get back the lost
energy. Based on a research by Lebowitz (2016), People high in extroversion tend to seek out
opportunities for social interaction, where they are often the “life of the party.” They are
comfortable with others, gregarious, and prone to action rather than contemplation.
2. Agreeableness: Concerns relationships with other people and how well the person gets along
with other individuals and how well they are in terms of interaction. According to a study by
Lebowitz (2016), People high in agreeableness tend to be well-liked, respected, and sensitive to
the needs of others. They likely have few enemies, are sympathetic, and affectionate to their
3. Conscientiousness: Conscientiousness is a trait that can be described as the tendency to control
impulses and act in socially acceptable ways, behaviours that facilitate goal-directed behavior (John
According to a research by Lebowitz (2016), Those high in neuroticism are generally given to
anxiety, sadness, worry, and low self-esteem. They may be temperamental or easily angered,
5. Openness: Openness to experience has been described as the depth and complexity of an
According to The American Psychological Association (APA) (2017), personality is the individual
differences in characteristic patterns of feelings, behaviour, and thinking. They elaborated on how
the personality and traits of one individual affects his/her way of thinking in various environments
whether in social or educational settings; People choose environments which are consistent with
their respected personalities; when achievement criteria and personality characteristics overlap,
personality and academic achievement may be directly related. (Caspi, Robert, & Shiner, 2005).
Some studies have indicated academic performance is positively associated with openness to
experience, agreeableness and extroversion. Meanwhile it’s negatively associated with neuroticism
(Laidra, 2007)(Lounsbury,2003). However, these findings have not been replicated in other studies
and no relationship has been reported between academic performance and extroversion
neuroticism, openness to experience, agreeableness and extroversion (Wolfe and Johnson, 1995)
achievement (Laidra, 2007). A large pile of studies show a positive association between academic
achievement and conscientiousness (Komarraju, Conard, 2009). According to Furnham, Zhang, &
Chamoro, (2006) found a negative relationship between extroversion and achievement at higher
education. This means that extroversion fails to meet the standard of academic achievement in the
High School curriculum. Highly extroverted students are more likely to spend their time on social and
extracurricular activities in comparison to less extroverted students, and in result, their academic
performance is greatly affected. They also experience stress and anxiety when faced with school
related work.
achievement. (Furnham, 2006). Neuroticism and extroversion leads to many factors that affect
academic performance such as illness, stress, body pains, headaches, and more. However,
Komarraju (2009) conducted a study on 308 undergraduate students and interestingly reported a
the researcher, this is caused by what is called as “achievement anxiety”. It is the anxiety that drives
Some studies also include a positive relationship between agreeableness and academic
achievement wherein performing well in group works and performance tasks compliment academic
achievement. Various researchers such as Furnham (2006), Duckworth & Seligman (2005), and
Lounsbury (2003) concluded more agreeable students tended to have higher GPAs and consequently
academic achievement (Paunonen & Ashton, 2001). Duff et al. (2004) reported a positive
relationship between these variables. As people who are open tend to become more adaptable to
new things, gives students a more active form of imagination, and improves intellectual curiosity,
positive relationships between Openness and academic achievement is not far from expectation.
Objective of the Study
2. To analyze and discuss the different Personalities of Goldberg and its effect on the Academic
Performance;
students.
Hypotheses
Research Questions
2. What personality of Goldberg has the most significant relationship with academic
performance?
CHAPTER II
PROCEDURE
Methodology
The method that was used for the study was the survey research. It is a method in which the
researchers selected random 40 Accounting Business Management from Grade 11 in Colegio San
White’s Principles of Good Research & Research Proposal Guide, which states that participants shall
be clearly informed on what the research is about (White, 2006), stated on the upper portion of the
questionnaire is a brief information about the research. Also, included there is the relevance or the
The instrument consists of a standardized personality test of Goldberg along with the
participants general average during the first semester. The questionnaire was designed in such a
format that it could be easily understood, both by the researchers and by the respondents.
1. The researchers personally gave consent forms for participants of each section to fill in. According to
the University of Tennessee, a consent paper makes sures that the participants are respected by
providing them an opportunity to accept or decline their involvement. Therefore, the researchers
2. Data gathering: Participants who gave their consent will be given a standardized test taken from
Psychologist World to answer in order for the researchers to determine their personality factor.
3. After answering the tests, the participants will be grouped according to the personality factor they
garnered.
4. The researchers will acquire the general average of every participant from the 1st semester of grade
level 11.
5. The researchers then will collect all the data and put it in MS excel which will be used to get the
The participants in this research are from the Grade 11 Accounting, Business, and
Management strand from sections H, I, and J with a population of 131 students. The researchers
used the Slovin’s formula to get the total number of samples. There is a total of forty (40) randomly
selected participants based on their personalities in this research. The breakdown of the participants
is as follows: Twenty-one (21) participants come from 11-H, the high average class of the ABM
strand. Seven (7) participants from 11-I. Twelve (12) participants from 11-J.
Statistical Tool
The statistical tool used in this research is Regression Main Result. The researchers aim to
explore the relationship between Goldberg’s Five Personality Traits and the academic performance
of Accounting Business Management students. The goal of this research is to understand how the
dependent variable (academic performance of students) changes when the independent variable is
Questions/Survey
CHAPTER III
DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
Data Analysis
This column chart shows the results of the participants when in comes to their personalities.
Out of the 40 samples, 8 of them have the personality of Agreeableness; 8 of them have the
personality of Neuroticism; 8 of them have the personality of Extraversion; 8 of them have the
This column chart shows the mean of the general averages of the participants according to
their respective personalities from the first semester. Extraversion garnered the mean of 89;
Openness to experience garnered the mean of 94; Conscientiousness garnered the mean of 92;
Agreeableness garnered the mean of 90; while Neuroticism garnered the mean of 86.
A. Descriptives
This table shows the Descriptive Analysis of data. Extraversion has a mean of 70.12 with a
standard deviation of 12.147. Openness has a mean of 74.05 with a standard deviation of 9.589.
Conscientiousness has a mean of 75.02 with a standard deviation of 8.722. Agreeableness has a
mean of 71.41 with a standard deviation of 11.140. Neuroticism has a mean of 61.68 with a
standard deviation of 14.442. The General Average has a mean of 90.49 with a standard deviation of
3.473.
B. Pearson Correlation
This table shows the Pearson Correlation Coefficient. This was determined to explore the
the General Average. There is no significant relationship between Extraversion and the General
Average (-.017). Likewise, there is also no significant relationship between Neuroticism and the
General Average (-.210). Similarly, there is also no significant relationship between Agreeableness
and the General Average (.211). Correspondingly, there is also no significant relationship between
On the other hand, there is a significant positive linear correlation between Openness and
This table shows that the 5 personality traits of Goldberg can predict the General Average.
The obtained R2 is .460, which means that 46% of the variance in the General Average is positively
variance scores, for F (5,34) = 5.782, p = <.05. Therefore the hypothesis stating that there is a
significant relationship between Goldberg’s personality factor: Openness to experience to the Grade
Discussion
Based on the results of this research, four of Goldberg’s personality factors, Neuroticism,
Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness, will not lead to garnering higher grades or
Academic achievement. However, Openness, affects Academic achievement in a positive way. This
was determined through Linear Regression which showed that Openness, had a significance of p =
.015, making it the highest of all. Based on the related literature the researchers found, it is said that
Openness, Conscientiousness, and Agreeableness are what usually affect Academic Performance in a
positive way. Although, it is stated that Conscientiousness and Openness are what mainly lead to
Academic Achievement, whereas Neuroticism and extraversion may lead to poor Academic
performance due to reasons such as anxiety, stress, pressure, and more. The second to the highest
factor that affects the general average aside from openness, although still does not have a significant
relationship with the DV, is extroversion. According to studies by Komarraju (2009) he reported a
the root of anxiety. According to the researcher, this is caused by what is called as “achievement
anxiety”. It is the anxiety that drives them to study harder in order to get above average grades.
These findings and results may be used and based upon by the schools admins and teachers,
so that they may determine what personality factor they should impose into the program of the
school and onto students in order to achieve an above average Academic Performance. In other
words, this may help the school to shape their students with a certain personality, that is Openness.
Many researchers have suggested a relationship between openness to experience and academic
achievement (Paunonen & Ashton, 2001). Duff et al. (2004) reported a positive relationship between
these variables. As people who are open tend to become more adaptable to new things, gives
students a more active form of imagination, and improves intellectual curiosity. The limitation of this
research is that it is only limited to 3 sections of the Accounting Business Management strand; and
that due to the heavy workload, only a few wanted to participate in the research study. In order for
the results of this research to be more accurate, the researchers should get a bigger sample size
from the ABM students of the Grade 11 batch, expand to the Grade 12 batch if possible, and conduct
this when students are not bombarded with such a heavy workload.
Conclusion
The researchers found that there is a significant and strong relationship between one of
Goldberg’s personality factors, Openness, to the General Average of the students. The other four of
or only has minimal impact to the General Average of these students and therefore will only have
minimal impact on their academic achievement. Having a high percentage with personality factor
Openness will lead to better and higher grades compared to the other four factors of personality.
Recommendations
1. Use a bigger sample size when conducting this kind of research in order to get highly
accurate results.
2. When conducting the personality factor test, use the legitimate long test by Goldberg for
3. Make sure that when the data is randomly hand picked in order to abide to the desired
sample size, every personality factor should have the same amount of participants.
4. After gathering the general average of the students, get the mean of all the grades per
5. Conduct the research during a season when the participants are not busy due to
requirements in order to avoid a test that was falsely answered to save time by a student.
This study will only be limited to the participants who are in the Accounting Business
Management strand in Colegio San Agustin-Makati. The chosen samples to represent the strand do
not represent the rest of the Accounting Business Management students in the Philippines. This
study will only provide a conclusion for the participants that are involved in this research. The
participants will only be taken from Accounting Business Management students studying in Colegio
San Agustin-Makati A.Y. 2017-2018. This research will only focus on a deeper understanding of the
effects of the 5 Personality traits on the Academic Performance in for randomly selected Accounting
Business Management students studying in Colegio San Agustin-Makati A.Y. 2017-2018. The
researchers disregarded factors such as, amount of time sleep, amount of extra-curricular activities,
amount of time to study, and such. The researched only focused on the Personalities of the
participants.
Bibliography
● Five Factor Test. (n.d.). Five Factor Test. Retrieved from
https://www.utc.edu/research-integrity/institutional-review-board/informedconsent/index.
https://www.psychologistworld.com/influence-personality/five-factor-test/test on March
13, 2018.
● Ackerman, C. (2017, October 19). The Big Five Personality Theory: The 5 Factor Model
Explained ( PDF). Retrieved March 14, 2018, from
https://positivepsychologyprogram.com/big-five-personality-theory/
● Furnham, A., Zhang, J., & Chamoro, T. (2006). The relationship between psychometric and
self-estimated intelligence, creativity, personality and academic achievement. Imagination,
cognition and personality. Retrieved on March 14, 2018.
● Cherry | Reviewed by Steven Gans, MD, K. (2018, February 23). What Are the Big 5
Personality Traits? Retrieved March 14, 2018, from
https://www.verywellmind.com/the-big-five-personality-dimensions-2795422
● Lounsbury, J. W., Tatum, H., Gibson, L. W., Park, S. H., Sundstorm, E., Hamrick, F., & Wilburn,
D. (2003a). The development of a big five adolescent personality scale. Retrieved on March
12 2018 from psychoeducational assessment, 21, 111-133.
● Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the big five personality traits in
predicting college students academic achievement. Retrieved on March 12 2018 from
Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 47-52.
● Laidra, K., Pullmann, H., & Allik, J. (2007). Personality and intelligence as predictors of
academic achievement : Across-sectional study from elementary to secondary school.
Retrieved on March 9 2018 from Personality and Individual Differences, 1-11.
● Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and
change. Retrieved on March 13 2018 from Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453-484.