Daily Lesson Log

(Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 42 s. 2016)

SCHOOL NAME SANTIAGO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL GRADE LEVEL 12

TEACHER Mr. FRANCES A. PALEC LEARNING AREA PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2

TEACHING DATES JUNE 4 – 5, 2018 QUARTER 1ST

Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4

I. OBJECTIVES
A. Content Standards The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The characteristics, strengths,
weaknesses, and kinds of
quantitative research.
2. The importance of quantitative
research across fields.
3. The nature of variables.
B. Performance Standards The learner is able to decide on
suitable quantitative research in
different areas of interest.
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The characteristics, strengths,
weaknesses, and kinds of
quantitative research.
2. The importance of quantitative
research across fields.
3. The nature of variables.
The learner is able to decide on
suitable quantitative research in
different areas of interest.
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The characteristics, strengths,
weaknesses, and kinds of
quantitative research.
2. The importance of
quantitative research across
fields.
3. The nature of variables.
The learner is able to decide on
suitable quantitative research in
different areas of interest.
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The characteristics, strengths,
weaknesses, and kinds of
quantitative research.
2. The importance of quantitative
research across fields.
3. The nature of variables.
The learner is able to decide on
suitable quantitative research in
different areas of interest.

1

C. Learning Competencies
Session 1
The learner:
Describes characteristics,
strengths, weaknesses, and kinds of
quantitative research.
Session 2
The learner:
Describes characteristics, strengths,
weaknesses, and kinds of
quantitative research.
Session 3
The learner:
Describes characteristics,
strengths, weaknesses, and kinds
of quantitative research.
Session 4
The learner:
Describes characteristics,
strengths, weaknesses, and kinds
of quantitative research.

Nature of Inquiry and Research Nature of Inquiry and Research Nature of Inquiry and Research Nature of Inquiry and Research

II. CONTENT

III. CODE CS_RS12-Ia-c-1 CS_RS12-Ia-c-1 CS_RS12-Ia-c-1 CS_RS12-Ia-c-1

IV. LEARNING Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2
RESOURCES Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros

V. REMARKS Continue the lesson Continue the lesson Continue the lesson Introduce new lesson
VI. REFLECTION
A. No. of learners who earned
80% on the formative
assessment.
B. No. of learners who require
additional activities for
remediation.
C. Intervention

Date Observed

Observed by:

2
 Daily Lesson Log
(Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 42 s. 2016)

SCHOOL NAME SANTIAGO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL GRADE LEVEL 12

TEACHER Mr. FRANCES A. PALEC LEARNING AREA PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2

TEACHING DATES JUNE 11 – 15, 2018 QUARTER 1ST

Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4

I. OBJECTIVES
A. Content Standards The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The characteristics, strengths,
weaknesses, and kinds of
quantitative research.
2. The importance of quantitative
research across fields.
3. The nature of variables.
B. Performance Standards The learner is able to decide on
suitable quantitative research in
different areas of interest.
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The characteristics, strengths,
weaknesses, and kinds of
quantitative research.
2. The importance of quantitative
research across fields.
3. The nature of variables.
The learner is able to decide on
suitable quantitative research in
different areas of interest.
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The characteristics, strengths,
weaknesses, and kinds of
quantitative research.
2. The importance of
quantitative research across
fields.
3. The nature of variables.
The learner is able to decide on
suitable quantitative research in
different areas of interest.
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The characteristics, strengths,
weaknesses, and kinds of
quantitative research.
2. The importance of quantitative
research across fields.
3. The nature of variables.
The learner is able to decide on
suitable quantitative research in
different areas of interest.

3
 Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4
C. Learning Competencies The learner: The learner: The learner: The learner:
Illustrates the importance of Illustrates the importance of Illustrates the importance of Illustrates the importance of
quantitative research across fields. quantitative research across fields. quantitative research across quantitative research across
fields. fields.

Nature of Inquiry and Research Nature of Inquiry and Research Nature of Inquiry and Research Nature of Inquiry and Research

II. CONTENT

III. CODE CS_RS12-Ia-c-2 CS_RS12-Ia-c-2 CS_RS12-Ia-c-2 CS_RS12-Ia-c-2

IV. LEARNING Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2
RESOURCES Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros

V. REMARKS Continue the lesson Continue the lesson Continue the lesson Introduce new lesson
VI. REFLECTION
A. No. of learners who earned
80% on the formative
assessment.
B. No. of learners who require
additional activities for
remediation.
C. Intervention

Date Observed

Observed by:

4
 Daily Lesson Log
(Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 42 s. 2016)

SCHOOL NAME SANTIAGO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL GRADE LEVEL 12

TEACHER Mr. FRANCES A. PALEC LEARNING AREA PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2

TEACHING DATES JUNE 18 – 22, 2018 QUARTER 1ST

Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4

I. OBJECTIVES
A. Content Standards The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The characteristics, strengths,
weaknesses, and kinds of
quantitative research.
2. The importance of quantitative
research across fields.
3. The nature of variables.
B. Performance Standards The learner is able to decide on
suitable quantitative research in
different areas of interest.
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The characteristics, strengths,
weaknesses, and kinds of
quantitative research.
2. The importance of quantitative
research across fields.
3. The nature of variables.
The learner is able to decide on
suitable quantitative research in
different areas of interest.
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The characteristics, strengths,
weaknesses, and kinds of
quantitative research.
2. The importance of
quantitative research across
fields.
3. The nature of variables.
The learner is able to decide on
suitable quantitative research in
different areas of interest.
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The characteristics, strengths,
weaknesses, and kinds of
quantitative research.
2. The importance of quantitative
research across fields.
3. The nature of variables.
The learner is able to decide on
suitable quantitative research in
different areas of interest.

5
 Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4
C. Learning Competencies The learner: The learner: The learner: The learner:
Differentiates kinds of variables Differentiates kinds of variables Differentiates kinds of variables Differentiates kinds of variables
and their uses. and their uses. and their uses. and their uses.

Nature of Inquiry and Research Nature of Inquiry and Research Nature of Inquiry and Research Nature of Inquiry and Research

II. CONTENT

III. CODE CS_RS12-Ia-c-3 CS_RS12-Ia-c-3 CS_RS12-Ia-c-3 CS_RS12-Ia-c-3

IV. LEARNING Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2
RESOURCES Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros

V. REMARKS Continue the lesson Continue the lesson Continue the lesson Introduce new lesson
VI. REFLECTION
A. No. of learners who earned
80% on the formative
assessment.
B. No. of learners who require
additional activities for
remediation.
C. Intervention

Date Observed

Observed by:

6
 Daily Lesson Log
(Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 42 s. 2016)

SCHOOL NAME SANTIAGO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL GRADE LEVEL 12

TEACHER Mr. FRANCES A. PALEC LEARNING AREA PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2

TEACHING DATES JUNE 25 – 29, 2018 QUARTER 1ST

Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4

I. OBJECTIVES
A. Content Standards The learner demonstrates The learner demonstrates The learner demonstrates The learner demonstrates
understanding of: understanding of: understanding of: understanding of:
1. The range of research topics in 1. The range of research topics in 1. The range of research topics 1. The range of research topics in
the area of inquiry. the area of inquiry. in the area of inquiry. the area of inquiry.
2. The values of research in the 2. The values of research in the area 2. The values of research in the 2. The values of research in the
area of interest. of interest. area of interest. area of interest.
3. The specificity and feasibility of 3. The specificity and feasibility of 3. The specificity and feasibility 3. The specificity and feasibility
the problem posed. the problem posed. of the problem posed. of the problem posed.

B. Performance Standards The learner is able to formulate The learner is able to formulate The learner is able to formulate The learner is able to formulate
clearly the statement of research clearly the statement of research clearly the statement of research clearly the statement of research
problem. problem. problem. problem.

7
 Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4
C. Learning Competencies The learner: The learner: The learner: The learner:
Designs a research useful in daily Designs a research useful in daily Writes a research title. Describes background of
life. life. research.

Identifying the Inquiry and Stating Identifying the Inquiry and Stating Identifying the Inquiry and Identifying the Inquiry and
the Problem the Problem Stating the Problem Stating the Problem
II. CONTENT

III. CODE CS_RS12-Id-e-1 CS_RS12-Id-e-1 CS_RS12-Id-e-2 CS_RS12-Id-e-3

IV. LEARNING Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2
RESOURCES Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros

V. REMARKS Continue the lesson Introduce new lesson Introduce new lesson Introduce new lesson
VI. REFLECTION
A. No. of learners who earned
80% on the formative
assessment.
B. No. of learners who require
additional activities for
remediation.
C. Intervention

Date Observed

Observed by:

8
 Daily Lesson Log
(Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 42 s. 2016)

SCHOOL NAME SANTIAGO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL GRADE LEVEL 12

TEACHER Mr. FRANCES A. PALEC LEARNING AREA PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2

TEACHING DATES JULY 2 – 6, 2018 QUARTER 1ST

Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4

I. OBJECTIVES
A. Content Standards The learner demonstrates The learner demonstrates The learner demonstrates The learner demonstrates
understanding of: understanding of: understanding of: understanding of:
1. The range of research topics in 1. The range of research topics in 1. The range of research topics 1. The range of research topics in
the area of inquiry. the area of inquiry. in the area of inquiry. the area of inquiry.
2. The values of research in the 2. The values of research in the area 2. The values of research in the 2. The values of research in the
area of interest. of interest. area of interest. area of interest.
3. The specificity and feasibility of 3. The specificity and feasibility of 3. The specificity and feasibility 3. The specificity and feasibility
the problem posed. the problem posed. of the problem posed. of the problem posed.

B. Performance Standards The learner is able to formulate The learner is able to formulate The learner is able to formulate The learner is able to formulate
clearly the statement of research clearly the statement of research clearly the statement of research clearly the statement of research
problem. problem. problem. problem.

9
 Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4
C. Learning Competencies The learner: The learner: The learner: The learner:
States research questions. Indicates scope and delimitation of Cites benefits and beneficiaries Presents written statement of the
study of study. problem.

Identifying the Inquiry and Stating Identifying the Inquiry and Stating Identifying the Inquiry and Identifying the Inquiry and
the Problem the Problem Stating the Problem Stating the Problem
II. CONTENT

III. CODE CS_RS12-Id-e-4 CS_RS12-Id-e-5 CS_RS12-Id-e-6 CS_RS12-Id-e-7

IV. LEARNING Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2
RESOURCES Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros

V. REMARKS Introduce new lesson Introduce new lesson Introduce new lesson Introduce new lesson
VI. REFLECTION
A. No. of learners who earned
80% on the formative
assessment.
B. No. of learners who require
additional activities for
remediation.
C. Intervention

Date Observed

Observed by:

10

SCHOOL NAME SANTIAGO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
TEACHER Mr. FRANCES A. PALEC
TEACHING DATES JULY 9 – 13, 2018
Session 1
I. OBJECTIVES
A. Content Standards The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
B. Performance The learner is able to:
Standards 1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
Daily Lesson Log
(Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 42 s. 2016)
GRADE LEVEL 12
LEARNING AREA PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
Session 2
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
The learner is able to:
1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
QUARTER 1ST
Session 3
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
The learner is able to:
1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
Session 4
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
The learner is able to:
1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
11
 Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4
C. Learning The learner: The learner: The learner: The learner:
Competencies Selects relevant literature. Selects relevant literature. Cites related literature using Cites related literature using
standard style (APA, MLA or standard style (APA, MLA or
Chicago Manual of Style). Chicago Manual of Style).

Learning from Others and Learning from Others and Learning from Others and Learning from Others and
Reviewing the Literature Reviewing the Literature Reviewing the Literature Reviewing the Literature
II. CONTENT

III. CODE CS_RS12-If-j-1 CS_RS12-If-j-1 CS_RS12-If-j-2 CS_RS12-If-j-2

IV. LEARNING Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2
RESOURCES Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros

V. REMARKS Continue the lesson Introduce new lesson Continue the lesson Introduce new lesson
VI. REFLECTION
A. No. of learners who
earned 80% on the formative
assessment.
B. No. of learners who
require additional activities
for remediation.
C. Intervention

Date Observed

Observed by:

12

SCHOOL NAME SANTIAGO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
TEACHER Mr. FRANCES A. PALEC
TEACHING DATES JULY 16 – 20, 2018
Session 1
I. OBJECTIVES
A. Content Standards The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
B. Performance The learner is able to:
Standards 1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
Daily Lesson Log
(Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 42 s. 2016)
GRADE LEVEL 12
LEARNING AREA PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
Session 2
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
The learner is able to:
1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
QUARTER 1ST
Session 3
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
The learner is able to:
1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
Session 4
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
The learner is able to:
1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
13
 Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4
C. Learning The learner: The learner: The learner: The learner:
Competencies Synthesizes information from Synthesizes information from Writes coherent review of Writes coherent review of
relevant literature. relevant literature. literature. literature.

Learning from Others and Learning from Others and Learning from Others and Learning from Others and
Reviewing the Literature Reviewing the Literature Reviewing the Literature Reviewing the Literature
II. CONTENT

III. CODE CS_RS12-If-j-3 CS_RS12-If-j-3 CS_RS12-If-j-4 CS_RS12-If-j-4

IV. LEARNING Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2
RESOURCES Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros

V. REMARKS Continue the lesson Introduce new lesson Continue the lesson Introduce new lesson
VI. REFLECTION
A. No. of learners who
earned 80% on the formative
assessment.
B. No. of learners who
require additional activities
for remediation.
C. Intervention

Date Observed

Observed by:

14

SCHOOL NAME SANTIAGO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
TEACHER Mr. FRANCES A. PALEC
TEACHING DATES JULY 23 – 27, 2018
Session 1
I. OBJECTIVES
A. Content Standards The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
B. Performance The learner is able to:
Standards 1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
Daily Lesson Log
(Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 42 s. 2016)
GRADE LEVEL 12
LEARNING AREA PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
Session 2
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
The learner is able to:
1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
QUARTER 1ST
Session 3
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
The learner is able to:
1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
Session 4
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
The learner is able to:
1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
15
 Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4
C. Learning The learner: The learner: The learner: The learner:
Competencies Follows ethical standards in writing Follows ethical standards in writing Illustrates and explain conceptual Illustrates and explain conceptual
related literature. related literature. framework. framework.

Learning from Others and Learning from Others and Learning from Others and Learning from Others and
Reviewing the Literature Reviewing the Literature Reviewing the Literature Reviewing the Literature
II. CONTENT

III. CODE CS_RS12-If-j-5 CS_RS12-If-j-5 CS_RS12-If-j-6 CS_RS12-If-j-6

IV. LEARNING Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2
RESOURCES Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros

V. REMARKS Continue the lesson Introduce new lesson Continue the lesson Introduce new lesson
VI. REFLECTION
A. No. of learners who
earned 80% on the formative
assessment.
B. No. of learners who
require additional activities
for remediation.
C. Intervention

Date Observed

Observed by:

16

SCHOOL NAME SANTIAGO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
TEACHER Mr. FRANCES A. PALEC
TEACHING DATES JULY 30 – AUGUST 3, 2018
Session 1
I. OBJECTIVES
A. Content Standards The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
B. Performance The learner is able to:
Standards 1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
Daily Lesson Log
(Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 42 s. 2016)
GRADE LEVEL 12
LEARNING AREA PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
Session 2
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
The learner is able to:
1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
QUARTER 1ST
Session 3
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
The learner is able to:
1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
Session 4
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
The learner is able to:
1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
17
 Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4
C. Learning The learner: The learner: The learner: The learner:
Competencies Defines terms used in study. Defines terms used in study. Lists research hypotheses (if Lists research hypotheses (if
appropriate). appropriate).

Learning from Others and Learning from Others and Learning from Others and Learning from Others and
Reviewing the Literature Reviewing the Literature Reviewing the Literature Reviewing the Literature
II. CONTENT

III. CODE CS_RS12-If-j-7 CS_RS12-If-j-7 CS_RS12-If-j-8 CS_RS12-If-j-8

IV. LEARNING Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2
RESOURCES Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros

V. REMARKS Continue the lesson Introduce new lesson Continue the lesson Introduce new lesson
VI. REFLECTION
A. No. of learners who
earned 80% on the formative
assessment.
B. No. of learners who
require additional activities
for remediation.
C. Intervention

Date Observed

Observed by:

18

SCHOOL NAME SANTIAGO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
TEACHER Mr. FRANCES A. PALEC
TEACHING DATES AUGUST 6 – AUGUST 10, 2018
Session 1
I. OBJECTIVES
A. Content Standards The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
B. Performance The learner is able to:
Standards 1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
Daily Lesson Log
(Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 42 s. 2016)
GRADE LEVEL 12
LEARNING AREA PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
QUARTER 1ST
Session 2 Session 3 Session 4
The learner demonstrates First Quarter Examinations First Quarter Examinations
understanding of:
1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
2. The ethical standards in writing
related literature.
3. The formulation of conceptual
framework.
4. The research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
5. The definition of terms as used in
the study.
The learner is able to: First Quarter Examinations First Quarter Examinations
1. Select, cite, and synthesize
judiciously related literature and use
sources according to ethical standards.
2. Formulate clearly conceptual
framework, research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and define terms used in
study.
3. Present objectively written review of
related literature and conceptual
framework.
19
 Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4
C. Learning The learner: The learner: First Quarter Examinations First Quarter Examinations
Competencies Presents written review of related Presents written review of related
literature and conceptual literature and conceptual
framework. framework.

Learning from Others and Learning from Others and First Quarter Examinations First Quarter Examinations
Reviewing the Literature Reviewing the Literature
II. CONTENT

III. CODE CS_RS12-If-j-9 CS_RS12-If-j-9

IV. LEARNING Practical Research 2 Practical Research 2

RESOURCES Esther L. Baraceros Esther L. Baraceros

V. REMARKS Continue the lesson Introduce new lesson

VI. REFLECTION
A. No. of learners who
earned 80% on the formative
assessment.
B. No. of learners who
require additional activities
for remediation.
C. Intervention

Date Observed

Observed by:

20