COLUMBAN COLLEGE, INC

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ACCOUNTANCY

No. 1 1st Street, East Tapinac, Olongapo City, Philippines

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Subject Teacher: Dolly Vinluan-Abasta, CPA, MBA,

CASE STUDY RUBICS

Group No. _______

CASE STUDY COMPONENT AREAS
NAME OF STUDENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Ability to work as a TEAM: This section should provide evidence that each team member is able to work
harmoniously with each other with outmost professionalism. Students must be able to demonstrate mastery of the
case study and ability to answer questions during presentation.

CASE STUDY COMPONENT AREAS – GRADING CRITERIA

Evaluation Very Good Good Poor
Dimensions (10 – 8) ( 7 - 5) (4 - 1)
Presents accurate and With a few exceptions, Does not recognize the
detailed descriptions of the identifies and outlines the problems or issues of the
problems and issues central principal problems and case, or identifies problems
(1) to the case; provides a well issues in the case; and issues that are not
Identification of focused diagnosis of demonstrates an acceptable based on facts of the case;
the Issues strategic issues and key understanding of the displays little
problems that demonstrates company’s issues, current understanding of the
an excellent grasp of the situation and strategic issues, key problems, and
company’s present situation challenges; executive the company’s present
and strategic challenge; summary provides an situation and strategic
descriptions are compelling adequate overview of the challenges; executive
and insightful. case issues and problems; summary does not present
summary is missing a few a clear overview of the
minor points but meets case issues; main points
expectation are not outlined or cannot
be understood
Clearly and accurately With few minor exceptions, Does not identify or explain
describes the unique adequately identifies and the perspectives of any
perspectives of multiple key summarizes the perspective stakeholders involved in
(2) stakeholders in the case; of the principal stakeholders the case or explanation is
Stakeholder demonstrates insightful involved in the case; outlines flawed in many respects;
Perspective analysis of strategy tensions some conflicts of interest fails to recognize any
or conflicts of interest between the company and differences between the
between the stakeholders. stakeholders. interests of the various
stakeholders.
Presents a balances, in- Provides an acceptable Simply repeats facts
depth and critical analysis of most of the identified in the case and
(3) assessment of the facts of issues and problems in the does not discuss the
Analysis and the case in light of relevant case; in most instances, relevance of these facts;
Evaluation empirical and theoretical analysis is adequately fails to draw conclusions or
research; develops insightful supported by theory and conclusions are not
and well-supported empirical data; appropriate justified or supported; does
conclusions using reasoned, not present relevant data;

1
 sound and informed
judgment.
Effectively weighs and
assesses a variety of
(4) alternative actions that
Courses of Action address the multiple issues
central to the case; proposes
detailed plans of actions;
action plans are realistic and
contain thorough and well-
reasoned justifications.
Objectively and critically
reflects upon alternative
(5) plans of actions; effectively
Recommendation: identifies, thoroughly
discusses and insightfully
evaluates the implications
and consequences resulting
from the proposed action
plans; identifies
consequences are tied to
the key issues central to
the case.
Evaluation Very Good
Dimensions (15 – 10)
Clearly displays evidence
that each team member is
(6) able to work harmoniously
Ability to work as with each other with outmost
a TEAM professionalism; ability to
demonstrate mastery of the
case study and ability to
answer questions during
presentation
Reference: IACBE Advancing Academic Quality in Business Education Worldwide
conclusions are outlined and
summarized.
Outlines and summarizes
some alternative courses of
actions to deal with most of
the issues and problems in
the case; in most instances,
proposed action plans are
outlined, are feasible and
based on relatively sound
theory and evidence.
Demonstrates acceptable
analysis of the results of
proposed action plans;
adequately outlines and
summarizes the implications
and consequences resulting
from the alternative courses
of actions; with a few minor
exceptions; identified
consequences of action
plans are related to key
issues in the case
Good
( 9 - 5)
Demonstrates acceptable
evidence that each team
member is able to work
harmoniously with each
other with outmost
professionalism; with a few
minor exceptions the ability
to demonstrate mastery of
the case study and ability to
answer questions during
presentation
2
shows no critical
examination of case
issues.
Has difficulty identifying
alternative and appropriate
courses of actions; few if
any alternatives are
presented, infeasible
actions are proposed,
action plans are not
supported or action do not
address the key issues and
problems in the case.
Displays limited awareness
and/or understanding of
the consequences of action
plans; fails to identify
implications and
consequences of proposed
action plans. Identified
outcomes do not follow
from proposed action
plans; identified outcomes
do not follow from
proposed action plans or
outcomes are not related to
issues in the case.
Poor
(4 - 1)
Displays limited evidence
that each team member is
able to work harmoniously
with each other with
outmost professionalism;
does not demonstrate
mastery of the case study;
and does not answer
questions during
presentation.
 BACC 40 GOOD GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
CASE STUDY

This rubrics will be used to assess the student’s work by specifying a score based on the performance
ratings using the following:

1. Identification of the Issues: This section should describe the ethical and social
responsibility/sustainability issues relevant to the case. This section should also include a
background of the study that provides an overview of the key issues and problems that are
central to the case.

The group will be asked to watch the documentary The Corporation. Published on Jul 21, 2012

THE CORPORATION is a Canadian documentary film written by Joel Bakan, and directed by Mark Achbar
and Jennifer Abbott. The documentary examines the modern-day corporation, considering its legal status
as a class of person and evaluating its behavior towards society and the world at large as a psychiatrist
might evaluate an ordinary person. This is explored through specific examples. Bakan wrote the book,
The Corporation: Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y888wVY5hzw&t=67s

2. Stakeholder Perspective. This section should identify the key stakeholders in the case and
describe and evaluate their differing perspective and interests.

3. Analysis and Evaluation. This section should present an analysis of the central issues and
problems in the case. This analysis should be informed by relevant theories applying to
business ethics, good governance and CSR and should lead to a set of conclusion that is
supported by appropriate evidence.

 Identify at (3) instances or companies or situations in the film that you think these corporations have
violated based on the Principles of Good Corporate Governance. Identify also which qualities /
Characteristic they failed to have.
 By using the Ishikawa Diagram or the Cause and Effect Diagram, analyse the situation and determine
what led them to do these actions. Discuss each causes that lead to the actions performed. State
the Principles that were violated.

4. Courses of Action: these section present plans of action for dealing with the central issues
and problems in the case. These should flow from previous analysis and evaluation and
should be appropriately justified.

As management students, what could be your courses of actions to the given situation by
providing at least (3) possible courses of action using the criteria SMART (SPECIFIC,
MEASURABLE, ATTAINABLE, REALISTIC and TIMELY) by giving 5 points as the highest score.

3
 Use this table

SPECIFI MEASURA ATTAINAB REALIS TIMELY TOTAL

COURSES OF ACTION C BLE LE TIC
1
2
3

 Please take note that you are to give specific COURSES OF ACTION
 Provide who are supposed to be the people (be specific) concerned to take actions on this.
 Provide also the PROs and CONs on the courses of actions.

5. Recommendation: This section should provide a description and analysis of the pros and cons
of the courses actions starting off with the least recommended courses of action to the best
recommended courses of action.