CY 2019 LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA INCENTIVE

LTIA FORM 01-PERFORMANCE EVALUA

A.IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
Lupong Tagapamayapa
City/Municipality
Region
Category

B.EVALUATION CRITERIA

CRITERIA
I EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS 35

A. Observance of Settlement Procedure and Settlement Deadlines 15

B. Systematic Maintenace of Records 5

C. Timely Submission of Reports to Concernced Agencies 5

D. Conduct of monthly meetings Exclusively on KP Matters 10

EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE SETTLEMENT OF

II.INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE OF THE KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY
(KP) 30
A. Quantity of settled cases againts filed 10

B. Quality of Settlement of Cases 10

C. At least 80% compliance with the terms of settlement or award 10

after the cases have been settled

III. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE 25

LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA

A. Settlement Technique 5

B. Coordination with concerned agencies relating to disputes filed 5

C. Sustained information drive to promote Katarungan Pambarangay (KP) 5
D. KP Training or seminar within the assessment period 10

5
IV. AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP ACTIVITIES

5
V. FINANCIAL OR NON FINANCIAL SUPPORT

TOTAL POINT SCORE 100

C. WE CERTIFY TO THE CORRECTNESS OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION

Chairperson Provincial Awards Committee

Vice Chairperson Provincial Awards Committee

Member Provincial Awards Committee Member Provincial Awards Committee

Member Provincial Awards Committee Member Provincial Awards Committee

D. DATE ACCOMPLISHED:
A. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
Lupong Tagapamayapa: _______________________________
City/Municipality: _____________________________
Region : XII
Category:

B. EVALUATION CRITERIA

ASSIGNED
ACTUAL REMARKS/
CRITERIA OBSERVATIO
POINT POINT SCORE N
SCORE VALUE
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION

A. Observance of Settlement Procedures and Settlement Deadlines 5

1 a proper recording of complaints 2.5
Sending of Summons to Parties within the
b prescribed period 1 to 3 days only 2.5
2 Settlement and Award Period 10
Mediation (within 15 days after initial
a confrontation with
Conciliation (15 theafter
days Lupon Chairman)
initial confrontation 10
with the Pangkat) with column of the date of
b initial confrontation 8
Conciliation with extended period of another 15
c days 6
Arbitration (within 10 days from the date of the
d agreement
Conciliationto arbitrate)
beyond 46 days but not more than 4
e 60 days 2
To compute: cases settled x assigned point score = Score
total number of cases filed
Actual Illustration:
Total Number of cases : 25
Mediated cases: 18
Conciliated cases : 3
Arbitrated Cases : 2

Mediated cases : 18 x 10 = 7.2

25
Conciliated cases : 3 x 8 = 0.96
25
Arbitrated cases : 2 x 4 = 0.32
25
Total Score : 7.2 + 0.96 +0.32 = 8.48 pts

B Systematic Maintenance of Records 5

● Records of Cases by docket number
◊ Manually 1
◊ Computerized
Copies of Minutes of Lupon meetings with 1
● attendance sheet 1
Coplies of reports submitted to the Court and to
● the DILG onare
All records filekept on file in a secured filling 1
● cabinet 1
C Timely Submission of Reports to Concernced Agencies 5
1 To the Court: 4
● complete and on time= 4
● complete but not on time = 2
● incomplete and not on time = 1
● no submission = 0
2 To the DILG 1
● Annual Report submitted to the DILG City or
Municipal Office not later than the 30th of January of the
ensuing year
D Conduct of Monthly Meeting Exclusive on KP Matters 10
● Notice of Meeting (must contain the Agenda) 2
To compute:
number of Notice of Meeting containing the agenda x 2
 12

● Minutes of the Meeting 8

To compute:
number of reported KP meetings x 8
12
EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE SETTLEMENT OF ENTERPERSONNAL DISPUTE
II OBJECTIVE OF THE KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY
A. Quantity of Settled cases againts filed 10
90-100% 10
80-89% 8
70-79% 6
60-69% 4
59% below 2
To compute:
Total number of settled cases x 100
Total no. of cases filed-cases outside the jurisdiction of KP
B. Quality of Settlement of Cases 10
● Zero case repudited 5
● Non-recurrence of cases settled 5

C. At least 80% compliance with the terms of settlement after

the cases have been settled 10
80-100% (with supporting documents) 10
70-79% (with supporting documents) 8
60-69% (with supporting documents) 6
50-51% (with supporting documents) 4
49 and below (with supporting documents) 2
To compute:
Total Number of Complied Settlement or Award X 100
Total no. of cases filed-cases outside the jurisdiction
III CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULLNESS OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
A Settlement Technique 5
Settlement Technique utilized by Lupon
● Reported more than one settlement technique 5
● reported one settlement technique 3
● No report 0
B. Coordination with Concerned Agencies relating 5 5
to disputes filed PNP, DSWD, DILG, DAR, DENR, Office of the
Prosecutor, Court, DOJ, CHR, volunter groups/organizations,
NGOs, CSOs, Barangay Justice Advocates

C. Sustained information drive to promote Katarungang 5

Pambarangay
● IEC materials produced 2
● IEC activities conducted 2
● Innovative Campaign Strategy 1
D. KP Training or seminar within the assessment period 10
1 Conducted by the Barangay 6
2 Training conducted by government or non 4
government organization participated by
Lupon members
IV AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP ACTIVITIES 5
Building structure or space 5
V. FINANCIAL OR NON FINANCIAL SUPPORT 5
1. City, Municipal or Provincial and NGAs 3
2. People's Organization, NGOs or Private Sector and others 2
TOTAL SCORE 100

Date:____________________
R/P/C/M Awards Committee Member
(Signature over printed Name)