Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
REMINDERS:
1. This rating sheet should be attached to the manuscript given to the panel members before the
defense to give the panel members sufficient time to evaluate the manuscript. It should be
submitted to the research teacher on the day of the defense. For purposes of transparency, the
students may be issued a copy of the rating sheet upon request.
2. The number of points deducted considered the weight of the specific part. The number of items in
some parts do not necessarily corresponds with the total points in order for the students to still
received some points. Example: Background of the study is 20 points but with 7 indicators. If all the 7
indicators were not observed, the students will still receive 6 points (20-14). The 6 points will
compensate for their “effort, time, expenses…”
3. Other observations not captured in the indicators should be written in the “Comments” Column.
CONTENT(70 points)
-adequate literatures are presented to support the need to conduct the study
-the significance of the study is clearly established _____
-the specific problems/objectives are well-stated
-the specific problems/objectives reflect the main objective of the study
**Deduct 2 points for every item not observed
4. Conceptual Framework of the study (10 points)
-the conceptual framework is clearly identified and discussed in relation to
the study (if necessary)
-supporting theories/concepts are sufficiently discussed in relation to the
study _____
**Deduct 1 point for every item not observed
5. Methodology (20 points)
-the research design is appropriate
-the scope and delimitations of the study are clearly defined
-the locale of the study is clearly identified and described
-the criteria for identifying participants/informants are non-discriminatory
-the data gathering tool is clearly described in relation to the specific ______
problems
-the procedures for data analyses are appropriate and well described
-the proposed data gathering procedures are discussed in an in-depth
manner
**deduct 2 point for every item not observed
6. The Instruments/Tools (10 points)
-the questions are relevant to the topic
-the questions are non-invasive of the privacy of the individual
-the questions are stated clearly
-the questions are sufficient to generate the needed information _______
-the questions are non-discriminatory
-alternative means for recording data/information are presented
**deduct 2 points for every item not observed
7. References (10 points)
-the references follow the institutional format adopted
-the references are adequate _______
-the references are recent (at most 7 years back)
-the reference materials are varied/diverse
** deduct 1 point for every item not observed
SCORE
_______________________________________ ______________
(Signature over printed name of panel member) (Date)