Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
_______________
* EN BANC.
32
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168d2872a5f626cdbd8003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 1/6
2/9/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 113
33
the avowed purpose, that is, to enable him eventually to vote and to be
elected as Director in the event of an unfavorable outcome of the SEC Case
would be pure naivete. He would still appear as counsel indirectly.
Barredo, J.:
I reserve my vote.
PETITION for certiorari and prohibition with preliminary
injunction to review the order of the Commissioner of the Security
and Exchange Commission.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
MELENCIO-HERRERA, J.:
Those named on the left list may be called the Puyat Group; those
on the right, the Acero Group. Thus, the Puyat Group would be in
control of the Board and of the management of IPI.
34
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168d2872a5f626cdbd8003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 2/6
2/9/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 113
_______________
1 p. 23, Rollo.
35
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168d2872a5f626cdbd8003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 3/6
2/9/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 113
“SEC. 11.
No Member of the Batasang Pambansa shall appear as counsel before
any court without appellate jurisdiction.
before any court in any civil case wherein the Government, or any
subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof is the adverse party,
or in any criminal case wherein any officer or employee of the
Government is accused of an offense committed in relation to his office,
or before any administrative body.
Neither shall he, directly or indirectly be interested financially in any
contract with, or in any franchise or special privilege granted by the
Government, or any subdivision, agency or instrumentality
36
_______________
2 p. 6, ibid.
37
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168d2872a5f626cdbd8003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 4/6
2/9/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 113
_______________
3 Am. Digest, 2d Dicennial Ed., Vol. 5, citing Atkinson vs. Board, etc., 108 P.
1046.
38
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168d2872a5f626cdbd8003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 5/6
2/9/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 113
39
plied for the receivership; and, a fortiori, the mere fact that one is a
Solicitor or practicing barrister being in no way connected with the
particular parties or subject matter, does not disqualify him to be
receiver. (Cochingyan, Jr. vs. Cloribel, 76 SCRA 361.)
——o0o——
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168d2872a5f626cdbd8003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 6/6