Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
on three equally important principles with respect to the rural sector: economic
development, social justice and political democratization. Economic development
involves reinvigoration and re-prioritization of Philippine agriculture within the
country's overall economic development program, rural poverty alleviation (two
thirds of the country's poor are rural poor), and food security.
The Estrada Administration will finish the land reform within four (4) years (July
1998 - June 2002). Republic Act 8532 extends implementation of the
Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) for another ten years, or until
2008, and provides a P50 billion fund. The Estrada Administration is committed
to completing CARP implementation within four years. This means distributing
the program's remaining balance of 3.466 million hectares of land by June 2002.
Of this 3.466 million hectares remaining for distribution, 1.592 million hectares
are private agricultural lands, for which the Department of Agrarian Reform
(DAR) will be responsible.
Republic Act 8532 allocated P50 billion for CARP implementation for the
next ten years, but to finish the remaining components of the program, a
total of P111 billion is needed. The Estrada Administration will therefore
work to ensure that an additional P60 billion is allocated for completion of
the agrarian reform program.
B. Speedy Resolution of Land Reform Legal Cases
One of the hallmarks of the previous DAR leadership was the speedy
resolution of legal cases related to land reform implementation. The
amount of legal cases resolved increased from 53 percent under the
Aquino Administration, to 95 percent under the Ramos Administration --
despite the fact that the number of cases also increased from 8184 (July
1987 -June 1992) to 117,487 (July 1992 to end of 1997). Land reform
implementation-related legal disputes are expected to increase even more
in the coming period due to the highly contentious character of the private
estates slated for reform. To maintain the standard of efficiency set by the
previous DAR leadership in terms of resolution of agrarian legal cases, the
incoming DAR leadership will take steps to immediately increase the
number of DAR Adjudication Board (DARAB) members from the present
three to nine. In addition, the Estrada Administration will also push for
better compensation packages for agrarian lawyers in order to attract
more legal professionals to the field of agrarian law.
Land use disputes have marked CARP implementation over time, slowing
progress and undermining its integrity. Many land use disputes are rooted
in the lack of clear and concrete state policy on land and water use. The
Estrada Administration, and the DAR in particular, will see that appropriate
and effective land and water use policy legislation is enacted at the
soonest possible time. An appropriate land and water use is one that gives
balanced, rational consideration to the country's food security
requirements as well as its industrial-commercial needs, and thus must be
guided by the basic principle that prime (irrigated) agricultural lands should
never be converted to other uses. An effective land and water use policy is
one that will employ a combination of incentives and disincentives, such
as a Land and Water Use Conversion Tax as well as an Idle Land Tax,
and will provide for the creation of a special agency or task force to ensure
that the policy is carried out.
Land- and water-use conversions as bases for land reform reversals are
rampant in areas of urban sprawl. The enactment of an appropriate and
effective land and water use policy should address this type of problem.
While the Estrada Administration also recognizes the need to allocate land
resources for non-agricultural uses, it also sees the need to take into
equal consideration the plight of farmers in areas where development into
non-agricultural use is inevitable. It will push for legislation to encourage
developers to treat displaced farmers as stakeholders in the development
process and assist them in making the shift from agricultural to non-
agricultural activities (through skills upgrading and partnerships in the
development venture).
Of the total CARP funds spent by the Aquino Administration, only 18.37% went to
the land acquisition and distribution (LAD), while 50.53% went to support
services. During the Ramos Administration, the emphasis was reversed: 48.40%
was spent on LAD, while only 18.15% was spent on support services. In
recognition of the interrelated and intertwined character of land reform and rural
development, the Estrada Administration will aim for a balanced fund allocation.
The previous DAR was able to launch 921 ARCs nationwide, in its effort to
focus support services to selected reformed communities. The incoming
DAR leadership will immediately initiate efforts to consolidate the actual
gains already made while filling in the "gaps" as needed.
Though the ARC concept is laudable, given limited state resources, the
current scope of ARCs covers only about 1 million hectares, effectively
excluding 3.6 million hectares of land reformed rural communities. while
the incoming administration will continue making focused and integrated
rural development intervention in the new ARCs, it will aspire to be as
expansionary and inclusionary as possible in order to take care of other
rural communities as well. This can be done through better coordinative
efforts with other state agencies that have important programs in rural
areas, especially the Department of Agriculture (DA).
CARP provides for institutions of interface between the private sector (e.g.
landowners), peasant and non-government organizations and state
agencies. Two of the most important mechanisms of this interface are the
Barangay Agrarian Reform Committees (BARCs) and the Provincial
Agrarian Reform Coordinating Committees (PARCCOMs). Sufficient
representation and effective participation by farmers in these basic local
level groups proved to be vital in successful implementation of land reform
programs in several countries in the past. These communities must
therefore be revitalized.
The agenda of land reform and rural development must be integrated into
the agendas of local government units, especially because there are
cases where local government units do not only not work for, but against,
agrarian reform. It is therefore an imperative that an "internal" education
campaign about the Estrada Administration's agrarian reform agenda be
launched among local government officials in the hope of recruiting them
to (land) reformism.