Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
most pressing issue is the fact that they have a roughly 6-month window to develop and deliver a
fully functional product to IBM. In order to most effectively address this, the firm needs to move
forward by outsourcing the development of their product to the Hotshot Coders. Timing is of
the essence in this situation, and the firm needs to deliver on this contract with IBM if they want to
stay in business; the rest of the challenges should be second priority to developing and delivering a
viable product.
Prioritizing the IBM Deal: A full contract with a firm like IBM would be extremely
advantageous for many entrepreneurs and their start-ups. Now that they have it and have only 6
months to develop a product, they should prioritize it over all other decisions, including the
development of their full product suite. A company that has successfully developed a product for
IBM can have so many more doors opened for it down the line. In addition, the successful delivery
of the software would lead to a $1mm cash infusion – significantly decreasing their need to raise
outside capital. Lastly, every professional industry has some degree of interconnectedness.
Ockham should consider the potential costs of failing to deliver on the IBM deal and what that
Ockham’s proprietary software is not a long-term solution. Given the time constraint and
Ockham for in-house development are not suitable for the role. Randy Anderson is another
skillset to execute it. Gus Taylor, on the other hand, was relaxing on a beach enjoying his
severance package from a large company. His experience is different from that of a startup, and he
does not have the proper incentives to return to work to meet a tight deadline. Furthermore,
Ockham’s track record for selecting someone to develop their product (Flex Solutions) has also
not been successful. Hiring somebody to spearhead this product development requires time. In
addition, committing to someone as their lead developer is a significant decision that can have
serious implications for the future of the company; it is a decision that they do not have the time to
make and should not make lightly. This leaves the company with the option to outsource. NIIT,
while they have experience with outsourced products and seem “professional,” are located in India
in a different time zone and will likely need more explicit descriptions on what needs to be done to
develop the product, something that the Ockham team doesn’t seem to have the expertise on.
Thoughtmill, though based in Atlanta and likely more flexible with the hand-holding that will be
required by Ockham due to their lack of programming knowledge, does not have any expertise in
sales management (which will take time to learn). Thus, it seems that the Hotshot Coders is the
best bet. They are local, vetted by Ockham’s accelerator ATDC, have deep knowledge of sales
management, they’re willing to work long hours to meet the deadline, and they are significantly
cheaper than the other two options at $175,000. Though Ockham is in the process of raising
capital, they currently only have $75,000 of their initial $150,000 in founder capital in addition to
$100,000 from IBM. Not only are the Hotshot Coders Ockham’s ideal partner from a strategic
Conclusion: Ockham Technologies would be best served by proceeding with the Hotshot Coders.
Though only a short-term solution to their need to master development expertise, they need to
deliver on this IBM contract if they want to maintain their company’s reputation and capitalize on
the unique opportunity that they have been given. Hotshot is the best company to do this due to
their sales expertise, price point, and willingness to meet the firm’s tight deadline.