Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • Case

    Загружено:

    Nivra Lyn Empiales
    912 просмотров1 страница
    Transfield Philippines received notices of deficiency income tax, expanded withholding tax, and value-added tax for fiscal years 2001 to 2002. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue issued a warrant of distraint and/or levy against Transfield. The Court of Tax Appeals declared the warrant null and void. The issue was whether Transfield was entitled to immunities under the Tax Amnesty Program. The Supreme Court ruled yes, as Transfield complied with all requirements of the tax amnesty by submitting the proper forms and paying the amnesty taxes, so the deficiency taxes for 2001 to 2002 were deemed settled.

    Исходное описание:

    case digest

    Авторское право

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Доступные форматы

    DOCX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    Transfield Philippines received notices of deficiency income tax, expanded withholding tax, and value-added tax for fiscal years 2001 to 2002. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue issued a warrant of distraint and/or levy against Transfield. The Court of Tax Appeals declared the warrant null and void. The issue was whether Transfield was entitled to immunities under the Tax Amnesty Program. The Supreme Court ruled yes, as Transfield complied with all requirements of the tax amnesty by submitting the proper forms and paying the amnesty taxes, so the deficiency taxes for 2001 to 2002 were deemed settled.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате DOCX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    912 просмотров1 страница

    Case

    Загружено:

    Nivra Lyn Empiales
    Transfield Philippines received notices of deficiency income tax, expanded withholding tax, and value-added tax for fiscal years 2001 to 2002. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue issued a warrant of distraint and/or levy against Transfield. The Court of Tax Appeals declared the warrant null and void. The issue was whether Transfield was entitled to immunities under the Tax Amnesty Program. The Supreme Court ruled yes, as Transfield complied with all requirements of the tax amnesty by submitting the proper forms and paying the amnesty taxes, so the deficiency taxes for 2001 to 2002 were deemed settled.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате DOCX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 1

    CIR vs. Transfield Philippines, Inc.

    ,
    G.R. No. 211449, January 16, 2019

    FACTS:
    Transfield Philippines, Inc. received copies of Final Assessment Notice (FAN)
    issued by Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) for deficiency income tax,
    Expanded Withholding Tax (EWT), and Value-Added Tax (VAT) for the Fiscal
    Year 2001 to 2002. CIR issued a Warrant of Distraint and/or Levy (WDAL)
    against Transfield. CTA First Division declared WDAL as null and void, which was
    affirmed by CTA En Banc.

    ISSUE:
    WON Transfield is entitled to the immunities under the Tax Amnesty Program
    provided in R.A. No. 9480?

    RULING:
    Yes. In this regard, Transfield complied with all the requirements pertaining to its
    application for tax amnesty by submitting to the BIR a Notice of Availment of Tax
    Amnesty, Tax Amnesty Return, SALN as of December 31, 2005, and Tax
    Amnesty Payment Form. Further, it paid the corresponding amnesty taxes. Thus,
    the deficiency taxes for Fiscal Year 2001 to J2002 are deemed settled in view of
    respondent's compliance with the requirements for tax amnesty under R.A. No.
    9480.

    Вам также может понравиться