Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 54

Annexure II: Checklists for Pavements

DPR Checklist – Stage 1 – Inception Report (Pavements)

General Details

Project Name

Consultant's Name

Date of Review

Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

1 Executive Summary Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

2 Project Appreciation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

2.1 Location of site office Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Review of scope of ToR and gap


2.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
identification

Key departments identified for various


2.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
documents

Start and end location of project verified


2.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
with client (Mention details)

Project description
2.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Start and End Chainage
 Village/District
Project location map
2.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 On State Map
 On District Map
2.7 Site photos and data of project alignment Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

2.8 Overview of land use plans Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Overview of existing pavement


conditions
2.9
 Number of Lanes Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Type of Pavement
(Flexible/Rigid/Surfaced/
Unsurfaced)
2.10 Existing right of way details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Number/ Location of major and minor


2.11 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
bridges

Number/ Location of level crossings


2.12 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

2.13 Number/ Location of ROB and RUB Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

2.14 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

3 Approach Methodology Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

3.1 Engineering survey and investigations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

3.2 Design of road, pavements and structures Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Environment and social impact


3.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
assessment

Estimation of project cost, viability and


3.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
financing options

3.5 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Task Assignment and Manning


4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Schedule

4.1 Number of key personnel provided Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Specific tasks assigned to each key


4.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
personnel

4.3 Manning schedule for key personnel Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

4.4 Number of key personnel deployed at site Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

5 Performa for data collection Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Indicative design standards and cross


6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
sections

7 Development plans Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Overview of development plans being


7.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
implemented/ proposed by local bodies

Overview of impact of such development


7.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
plans

8 Quality Assurance Plan Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8.1 Engineering surveys and investigation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8.2 Traffic surveys Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Material geo-technical and sub-soil


8.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
investigations

8.4 Road and pavement investigations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Investigation and design of bridges and


8.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
structures

8.6 Environment and R&R assessment Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8.7 Economic and financial analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8.8 Drawing and documentation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8.9 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Discussion of draft QAP document with


8.10 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
client

Approval of final QAP document by


8.11 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
client

9 Draft design Standards Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Geometric design standards of highway


9.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
(Plain)

Geometric design standards of highway


9.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
(Hilly)
Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

10 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.1 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Report fulfils project objectives and


10.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
scope as per RFP

10.3 Report reviewed for errors and omissions Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Compliance report prepared on client


10.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
observations
DPR Checklist – Stage 2 – Feasibility Report (Pavements)

General Details

Project Name

Consultant's Name

Date of Review

Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/ NO/ NA Remarks
Specifications

1 Executive Summary Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Overview of client organization /


2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
activities

Methodology adopted for feasibility


3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
study

Socioeconomic profile of the project


4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
areas

Regional economic profile basis last 10


4.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
years data as per IRC

Economic profile of project influence


4.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
area basis last 10 years data as per IRC

Socio Economic status of project


4.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
influence area

Indicative design standards,


5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
methodologies, and specifications

6 Traffic surveys and analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Classified traffic volume counts using


6.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IHMCL data (7 day data)

Traffic projection methodology as per


6.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:108

6.3 Projected Traffic data for 20 years Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

6.4 Current and Projected PCU Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐


Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/ NO/ NA Remarks
Specifications

6.5 Current and Projected TVU Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Origin destination surveys as per IRC:


6.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
102

6.7 Speed and delay studies as per IRC:102 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Traffic surveys for the design of road


6.8 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
junctions as per data in IRC: SP:41

Analysis for replacing railway level


6.9 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
crossings with over bridges/ subways

6.10 Axle load survey as per IRC:SP:19 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

6.11 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Traffic surveys monitored and reviewed


6.12 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
by the client

7 Reconnaissance survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

7.1 Road Inventory Survey as per IRC:SP:19 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Review of Road Inventory survey by


7.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
client

Chainage wise details of pavement


7.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
composition survey

Geological Survey
7.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Geological Map of the Area
 Seismicity
Climatic Conditions
7.5  Temperature Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Rainfall
 Wind
Pavement composition and condition
7.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
survey as per IRC:SP:19

Review of pavement composition and


7.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
condition survey by client

Pavement roughness survey as per


7.8 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:SP:16
Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/ NO/ NA Remarks
Specifications

Review of pavement roughness survey


7.9 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
by client

Pavement structural strength survey as


7.10 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
per IRC:81

Review of pavement structural strength


7.11 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
survey by client

7.12 Sub grade characteristics and strengths Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Topographical survey as per IRC:SP:19


using LiDAR
7.13 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Gradient
 Terrain
7.14 Review of topographical survey by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Inventory of bridges, culverts and


7.15 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
structures

Condition survey for bridges, culverts


7.16 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
and structures

Review of condition survey for bridges,


7.17 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
culverts and structures by client

7.18 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8 Geotechnical Survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Geo-technical and sub-soil explorations


8.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
as per IRC:78

Bore holes dug for every pier and


8.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
abutment

Review of geo-technical and sub-soil


8.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
explorations by client

Field testing, soil sampling, laboratory


8.4 testing in accordance with BIS/ Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
AASHTO/ BS

Recommendation of Foundation Type


8.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
and Depth
Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/ NO/ NA Remarks
Specifications

8.6 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9 Hydraulic and Hydrological Survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Hydraulic and hydrological


9.1 investigations as per IRC:SP:13 and Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:5

9.2 High Flood Level specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9.3 Depth of Water Table specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9.4 Ponded Water Level specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9.5 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Review of hydrological investigations by


9.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
client

10 Materials Survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Materials Survey conducted as per


10.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:SP:19

Sources of Naturally Occurring


Aggregates specified
10.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Details of Borrow Pits with
Distance from Project Site
 Cost of Material/ Transportation
Sources of Manufactured Items specified
10.3  Details of suppliers with distance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
from project site
 Cost of material/ transportation
Sources of water for construction
10.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
specified as per IS: 456

10.5 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Environmental screening/ preliminary


11 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
environmental assessment

Analysis basis Initial Environment


11.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Examination in IRC: SP: 19
Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/ NO/ NA Remarks
Specifications

Recommended feasible mitigation


11.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
measures

Initial social assessment/ preliminary


12 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
LA resettlement plan

Analysis basis Initial Environment


12.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Examination in IRC: SP: 19

Details of consultation with potentially


12.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
affected persons

Names/ Details of consultation with local


12.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
NGOs

Names/ Details of consultation with


12.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
municipal authorities

12.5 Preliminary resettlement plan Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

12.6 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

13 Cost estimates Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

13.1 Item rates and rate analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

13.2 Escalation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

14 Economic and financial analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

14.1 Estimated cost details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

14.2 Projected revenues details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

14.3 Assumptions stated Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Analysis and results (IRR, Sensitivity


14.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Analysis, Financial Viability)

15 Strip plan and Alignment Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Details of center line of proposed


15.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
highway

15.2 Details of existing RoW Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

15.3 Details of proposed RoW Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/ NO/ NA Remarks
Specifications

Details about ownership of land to be


15.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
acquired

Strip plan basis reconnaissance and


15.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
topographic surveys

Strip plan reviewed and approved by the


15.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
client

16 Alignment Options Study Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

At least two alignments proposed


16.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Details of Alignments on Map
16.2 Review of options with client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Length of the project along proposed


16.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
alignment options

Land Acquisition required along


16.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
alignment options

16.5 Cost Estimates of alternatives Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Recommended Alignment with


16.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Justification

16.7 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

17 Technical Specifications Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

MoRTH technical specifications for


17.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Roads and Bridge works followed

17.2 Details of technical specifications Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

18 Rate Analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Rate analysis for all relevant items as per


18.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
latest SoR

19 Cost Estimates Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Cost estimates for all relevant items as


19.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
per latest SoR

20 Bill of quantities Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/ NO/ NA Remarks
Specifications

21 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

21.1 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Report fulfils project objectives and


21.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
scope as per RFP

21.3 Report reviewed for errors and omissions Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Compliance report prepared on client


21.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
observations
DPR Checklist – Stage 3 – LA and Clearances I Report (Pavements)

General Details

Project Name

Consultant's Name

Date of Review

Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

1 Executive Summary Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

2 Environment Clearance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Requirement for environment clearance


2.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
identified

Date/ Details of Initial consultation with


2.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Date of submission of draft EIA report/


2.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
proposal for clearance

2.4 Review of proposal/ EIA report by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

3 Forest Clearance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Requirement for forest clearance


3.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
identified

Date/ Details of initial consultation with


3.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Details/cost of trees being felled basis


3.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
concerned District Forest Office

Date of submission of proposal for forest


3.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
clearance

3.5 Review of proposal by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

4 Wildlife Clearance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Requirement for wildlife clearance


4.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
identified

Date/ Details of initial consultation with


4.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Details/cost of trees being felled basis


4.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
concerned District Forest Office

Date of submission of proposal for


4.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
wildlife clearance

4.5 Review of proposal by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

5 Utility Clearances (Electricity) Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

5.1 Identification of overground utilities Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Identification of underground utilities


5.2 using GPR, Induction Locator or Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
equivalent technologies

Name/ Details of consultation with local


5.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
authority/ people

Utility relocation plan with existing /


5.4 proposed location showing existing RoW Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
and topographic details

5.5 Cost for relocation as per authority Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Date of proposal submission to


5.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Review of utility relocation plan/


5.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
proposal by client

6 Utility Clearances (Water) Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Identification of overground utilities in


6.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
RoW

Identification of underground utilities


6.2 using GPR, Induction Locator or Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
equivalent technologies
Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Name/ Details of consultation with local


6.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
authority/ people

Utility relocation plan with existing /


6.4 proposed location showing existing RoW Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
and topographic details

6.5 Cost for relocation as per authority Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Date of proposal submission to


6.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
competent authority

Review of utility relocation plan/


6.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
proposal by client

7 Utility Clearances (Others) Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Identification of overground utilities in


7.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
RoW

Identification of underground utilities


7.2 using GPR, Induction Locator or Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
equivalent technologies

Name/ Details of consultation with local


7.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
authority/ people

Utility relocation plan with existing /


7.4 proposed location showing existing RoW Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
and topographic details

7.5 Cost for relocation as per authority Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Date of proposal submission to


7.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Review of utility relocation plan/


7.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
proposal by client

8 Railway Clearances Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Identification of ROB/ RUB on project


8.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
corridor

Initial consultation with competent


8.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
authority
Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Date of proposal submission to


8.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

8.4 Review of GAD/ proposal by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9 Other Clearances Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Requirement for other clearances


9.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
identified

Date of proposal submission to


9.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

9.3 Review of proposal by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10 Land Acquisition Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Detailed schedule about acquisition of


10.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
landholdings as per land records

10.2 Consultation with affected persons Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Name/ Details of consultation with


10.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
NGOs

Name/ Details of consultation with


10.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
concerned government agencies

Total land required, land area already


10.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
available , land to be acquired identified

Review of land acquisition using digital


10.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
cadastral map by client

10.7 Draft 3a notification submitted Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.8 Review of 3a notification by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.9 Date of 3a gazette notification Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

10.10 Draft 3a notification submitted Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.11 Review of 3A notification by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.12 Date of 3A gazette notification Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

11 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

11.1 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Report fulfils project objectives and


11.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
scope as per RFP

11.3 Report reviewed for errors and omissions Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Compliance report prepared on client


11.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
observations
DPR Checklist – Stage 4 – Detailed Project Report (Pavements)

General Details

Project Name

Consultant's Name

Date of Review

Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

1 Main Report Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

2 Introduction and project background Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Overview of project location, project


2.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
objectives etc.

Overview of report structure,


2.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
deliverables etc.

3 Social analysis of the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Project impact on stakeholders such as


3.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
local people

Project impact on residential, commercial


3.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
and public properties

3.3 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

4 Reconnaissance survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Geometric Features of the Existing Road

Design Speed
4.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Sight distance details
 Horizontal Alignment Details
 Vertical Alignment Details
 Height of Embankment
Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Topographical Survey using LiDAR (or


equivalent technology) as per IRC:SP:19
4.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Gradient
 Terrain
Pavement composition and condition
4.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
survey as per IRC:SP:19

Pavement roughness survey as per


4.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ Na
IRC:SP:16

Pavement structural strength survey as


4.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
per IRC:81

Geological Survey
4.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Geological Map of the Area
 Seismicity
Climatic Conditions
4.7  Temperature Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Rainfall
 Wind
Land Use along the existing alignment
4.8  Map of the Project Area depicting Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Agricultural/Habitation/Forest
Area
Details of Existing Structures

4.9  Map of the Project Area depicting Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Hutments/Buildings/Temples/Pub
lic Building/Any Other
Significant Structure
Inventory and condition survey of
4.10 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
culverts

Geo-technical and sub-soil explorations


4.11 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
as per IRC:78

Number of Bore holes dug (holes for


4.12 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
every pier and abutment)

Field testing, soil sampling, laboratory


4.13 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
testing as per IRC: 78
Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Recommendation of Foundation Type


4.14 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
and Depth

4.15 Hydrological investigations as per IRC:5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

4.16 High Flood Level specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

4.17 Depth of Water Table specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

4.18 Ponded Water Level specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Materials Survey conducted as per


4.19 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:SP:19

Sources of Naturally Occurring


Aggregates specified
4.20 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Details of Borrow Pits with
Distance from Project Site
 Cost of Material/Transportation
Sources of Manufactured Items specified
4.21  Details of Suppliers with Distance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
from Project Site
 Cost of Material/Transportation
Source of Water for construction
4.22 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
specified as per IS:456

4.23 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Traffic studies and demand forecast


5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
designs

Classified traffic volume counts using


5.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IHMCL data (7 day data)

Traffic projection methodology as per


5.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:108

5.3 Projected Traffic data for 20 years Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

5.4 Current and Projected PCU Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

5.5 Current and Projected TVU Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Origin destination surveys as per IRC:


5.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
102
Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

5.7 Speed and delay studies as per IRC:102 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Traffic surveys for the design of road


5.8 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
junctions as per data in IRC: SP:41

Analysis for replacing railway level


5.9 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
crossings with over bridges/ subways

5.10 Axle load survey as per IRC:SP:19 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

5.11 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Traffic surveys monitored and reviewed


5.12 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
by the client

6 Cost estimates Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

6.1 Project costing as per latest SoR Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

7 Environmental aspects Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

7.1 Environment profile of the project region Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Details of Public consultation at


7.2 residential and commercial settlements Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
affected

7.3 Impact analysis and mitigation measures Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8 Economic and commercial analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8.1 Estimated cost details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8.2 Projected revenues details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8.3 Assumptions stated Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Analysis and results (IRR, Sensitivity


8.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Analysis, Financial Viability)

8.5 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Report fulfils project objectives and


9.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
scope as per RFP
Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

9.2 Report reviewed for errors and omissions Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Compliance report prepared on client


9.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
observations

10 Design Report Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.1 Highway improvement proposals Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.2 Highway geometric designs Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.3 Roadside drainage Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.4 Intersections Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.5 Urban service roads Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.6 Bus-stops Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.7 Toll plazas Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.8 Pedestrian crossings Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.9 Utility relocation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.10 Pavement Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.11 Structures Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.12 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Pavement deflection survey as per IRC


10.13 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
81-1997

10.14 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

11 Materials Report Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

11.1 Material investigations as per IRC:10 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Review of material investigations by


11.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
client

11.3 Multiple borrow areas identified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

11.4 Material survey as per IRC: SP: 19 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

11.5 Review of material survey by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Geo-technical and sub-soil explorations


11.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
as per IRC:78

Review of geo-technical and sub-soil


11.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
explorations by client

Field testing, soil sampling, laboratory


11.8 testing in accordance with BIS/ Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
AASHTO/ BS

Pavement composition and condition


11.9 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
survey as per IRC:SP:19

Review of pavement composition and


11.10 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
condition survey by client

Pavement roughness survey as per


11.11 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:SP:16

Review of pavement roughness survey


11.12 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
by client

Pavement structural strength survey as


11.13 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
per IRC:81

Review of pavement structural strength


11.14 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
survey by client

Water sample tests as per MoRTH


11.15 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
specifications

11.16 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Environmental Assessment Report/


12 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan

Option for alignment alternatives


12.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
considered and conclusions

Land environment data collection and


12.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
details/ impact/ mitigation measures

Air environment data collection and


12.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
details/ impact/ mitigation measures
Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Water resources details/ impact/


12.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
mitigation measures

Noise environment details/ impact/


12.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
mitigation measures

Biological environment details/ impact/


12.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
mitigation measures

12.7 Details of public consultation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Environment monitoring and


12.8 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
management plan

12.9 Details of social impact assessment Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Details of resettlement and rehabilitation


12.10 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
action plan

12.11 Measures to minimize resettlement Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Details of public consultation with


12.12 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
stakeholders

Details of implementation arrangement /


12.13 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
budget

12.14 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

13 Technical Specifications Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

MoRTH technical specifications for


13.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Roads and Bridge works followed

13.2 Details of technical specifications Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

14 Rate Analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Rate analysis for all relevant items as per


14.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
latest SoR

15 Cost Estimates Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Cost estimates for all relevant items as


15.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
per latest SoR

16 Bill of quantities Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

17 Drawing Volume Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


DPR Checklist – Stage 5 – Technical Schedules (Pavements)

General Details

Project Name

Consultant's Name

Date of Review

Details /
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

1 Schedule A - Site of the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Schedule B - Development of the


2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
project highway

3 Schedule C - Project facilities Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Schedule D - Specifications and


4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
standards

5 Any other relevant details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


DPR Checklist – Stage 6 – LA and Clearances II Report (Pavements)

General Details

Project Name

Consultant's Name

Date of Review

Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

1 Executive Summary Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

2 Environment Clearance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

2.1 Details of public hearings completed Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Date of final environment clearance by


2.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

3 Forest Clearance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Date/ Details of Joint site inspection with


3.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
DFO/ competent authority

Date of Stage I forest clearance approval


3.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
by competent authority

Date of final forest clearance approval by


3.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

4 Wildlife Clearance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Date/ Details of joint site inspection with


4.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
DFO/ competent authority

Date of final wildlife clearance approval


4.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
by competent authority

5 Utility Clearances (Electricity) Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Date/ Details of Joint site inspection with


5.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority
Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Date of estimate submission by


5.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Date of estimate approval by competent


5.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
authority

6 Utility Clearances (Water) Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Date/ Details of Joint site inspection with


6.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Date of estimate submission by


6.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Date of estimate approval by competent


6.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
authority

7 Utility Clearances (Others) Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Date/ Details of Joint site inspection with


7.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Date of estimate submission by


7.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Date of estimate approval by competent


7.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
authority

8 Railway Clearances Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Date/ Details of joint site inspection with


8.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Date of final approval of GAD by


8.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

9 Other Clearances Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Date of final approval by competent


9.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
authority

10 Land Acquisition Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.1 Draft 3a notification submitted Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

10.2 Review of 3a notification by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐


Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

10.3 Date of 3a gazette notification Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

10.4 Draft 3a notification submitted Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

10.5 Review of 3A notification by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

10.6 Date of 3A gazette notification Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Date of Joint Measurement Survey with


10.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

10.8 Draft 3D notification submitted Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.9 Review of 3D notification by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.10 Date of 3D gazette notification Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

11 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

11.1 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Report fulfils project objectives and


11.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
scope as per RFP

11.3 Report reviewed for errors and omissions Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Compliance report prepared on client


11.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
observations
Annexure III: Checklists for Structures such as ROB/ RUB

DPR Checklist – Stage 1 – Inception Report (Structures)

General Details

Project Name

Consultant's Name

Date of Review

Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

1 Executive Summary Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

2 Project Appreciation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

2.1 Location of site office Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Review of scope of ToR and gap


2.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
identification

Details of key departments for


2.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
documents

Project description
2.4  Existing LC number Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Start and End Chainage
 Village/District
Project location map

2.5  On State Map Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐


 On District Map
 Latitude & Longitude
Coordinates of the LC
Details of Existing Level Crossing

2.6  Number of Railway Tracks Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐


 Type of Railway Tracks
(Broad/Meter/Narrow)
 No. of trains per day
Justification for need of an ROB/RUB
2.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
(on basis of TVU count)
Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

2.8 Overview of land use plans Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Overview of existing pavement


conditions
2.9
 Number of Lanes Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Type of Pavement
(Flexible/Rigid/Surfaced/Unsurfa
ced)
2.10 Existing right of way details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

2.11 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

3 Approach Methodology Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

3.1 Engineering survey and investigations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

3.2 Design of road, pavements and structures Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Environment and social impact


3.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
assessment

Estimation of project cost, viability and


3.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
financing options

3.5 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Task Assignment and Manning


4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Schedule

4.1 Number of key personnel provided Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Specific tasks assigned to each key


4.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
personnel

4.3 Manning schedule for key personnel Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

4.4 Number of key personnel deployed at site Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

5 Performa for data collection Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Indicative Design standards and cross


6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
sections

7 Development plans Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Overview of development plans being


7.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
implemented/ proposed by local bodies

Overview of impact of such development


7.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
plans

8 Quality Assurance Plan Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8.1 Engineering surveys and investigation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8.2 Traffic surveys Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Material geo-technical and sub-soil


8.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
investigations

8.4 Road and pavement investigations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Investigation and design of bridges and


8.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
structures

8.6 Environment and R&R assessment Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8.7 Economic and financial analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8.8 Drawing and documentation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Discussion of draft QAP document with


8.9 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
client

Approval of final QAP document by


8.10 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
client

8.11 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9 Draft design standards Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Geometric design standards of bridges


9.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
(Plain)

Geometric design standards of bridges


9.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
(Hilly)

9.3 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.1 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Report fulfils project objectives and


10.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
scope as per RFP

10.3 Report reviewed for errors and omissions Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Compliance report prepared on client


10.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
observations
DPR Checklist – Stage 2 – Feasibility Report (Structures)

General Details

Project Name

Consultant's Name

Date of Review

Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

1 Executive Summary Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Overview of client organization /


2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
activities

Methodology adopted for feasibility


3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
study

Socioeconomic profile of the project


4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
areas

Regional economic profile basis last 10


4.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
years data as per IRC

Economic profile of project influence


4.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
area basis last 10 years data as per IRC

Socio Economic status of project


4.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
influence area

Indicative design standards,


5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
methodologies, and specifications

6 Traffic surveys and analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Classified traffic volume counts using


6.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IHMCL data (7 day)

Traffic projection methodology as per


6.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:108

6.3 Projected Traffic data for 20 years Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

6.4 Current and Projected PCU Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

6.5 Current and Projected TVU Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

6.6 Axle load survey as per IRC:SP:19 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

6.7 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Traffic surveys monitored and reviewed


6.8 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
by the client

7 Reconnaissance survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

7.1 Road Inventory as per IRC:SP:19 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Review of Road Inventory Survey by


7.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
client

Geometric Features of the Existing Road

 Design Speed
7.3  Sight distance elements Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Horizontal Alignment Details
 Vertical Alignment Details
 Height of Embankment
Topographical Survey as per IRC:SP:19
using LiDAR or equivalent technology
7.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Gradient
 Terrain
7.5 Review of topographical survey by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Pavement composition and condition


7.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
survey as per IRC:SP:19

Geological Survey
7.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Geological Map of the Area
 Seismicity
Climatic Conditions
7.8  Temperature Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Rainfall
 Wind
Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Land Use along the existing alignment


7.9  Map of the Project Area depicting Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Agricultural/Habitation/Forest
Area
Details of Existing Structures

7.10  Map of the Project Area depicting Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Hutments/Buildings/Temples/Pub
lic Building/Any Other
Significant Structure
Inventory and condition survey of
7.11 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
culverts

7.12 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8 Geotechnical Survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Geo-technical and sub-soil explorations


8.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
as per IRC:78

Number of Bore holes dug (holds for


8.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
every pier and abutment)

Review of geo-technical and sub-soil


8.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
explorations by client

Field testing, soil sampling, laboratory


8.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
testing as per IRC:78

Recommendation of Foundation Type


8.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
and Depth

8.6 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9 Hydraulic & Hydrological Survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Hydrological investigations as per IRC:5


9.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
and IRC: 13

9.2 High Flood Level specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9.3 Depth of Water Table specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9.4 Ponded Water Level specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9.5 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Review of Hydrological Survey by the


9.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
client

10 Materials Survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Materials Survey conducted as per


10.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:SP:19

Sources of Naturally Occurring


Aggregates specified
10.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Details of Borrow Pits with
Distance from Project Site
 Cost of Material/Transportation
Sources of Manufactured Items specified
10.3  Details of Suppliers with Distance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
from Project Site
 Cost of Material/Transportation
Source of Water for construction
10.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
specified as per IS:456

10.5 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Determination of whether ROB or


11 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
RUB is appropriate

Justification of whether ROB or RUB


11.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
should be built

11.2 Review of justification by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

12 Alignment Options Study Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

At least two alignments proposed


12.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Details of Alignments on Map
12.2 Review of options with client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Length of the project along proposed


12.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
alignment options

Land Acquisition required along


12.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
alignment options

12.5 Cost Estimates of alternatives Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Recommended Alignment with


12.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
Justification

Skew Angle of Proposed Alignment


12.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
Specified

Review and approval of alignment by


12.8 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
client

12.9 Traffic Diversion Route Specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

12.10 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Environmental screening/ preliminary


13 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
environmental assessment

Analysis basis Initial Environment


13.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Examination in IRC: SP: 19

Recommended feasible mitigation


13.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
measures

Initial social assessment/ preliminary


14 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
LA resettlement plan

Analysis basis Initial Environment


14.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Examination in IRC: SP: 19

Details of consultation with potentially


14.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
affected persons

14.3 Details of consultation with local NGOs Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Details of consultation with municipal


14.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
authorities

14.5 Preliminary resettlement plan Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

14.6 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

15 Cost estimates Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

15.1 Item rates and rate analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

15.2 Escalation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

16 Economic and financial analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

16.1 Estimated cost details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

16.2 Projected revenues details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

16.3 Assumptions stated Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Analysis and results


16.4  IRR Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Sensitivity Analysis
 Financial Viability
16.5 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

17 Strip Plan NA

Details of center line of proposed


17.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
structure

17.2 Details of existing RoW Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

17.3 Details of proposed RoW Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Details about ownership of land to be


17.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
acquired

Strip plan basis reconnaissance and


17.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
topographic surveys

Strip plan reviewed and approved by the


17.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
client

17.7 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

18 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

18.1 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Report fulfils project objectives and


18.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
scope as per RFP

18.3 Report reviewed for errors and omissions Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Compliance report prepared on client


18.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
observations
DPR Checklist – Stage 3 – LA and Clearances I Report (Structures)

General Details

Project Name

Consultant's Name

Date of Review

Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

1 Executive Summary Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

2 Environment Clearance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Requirement for environment clearance


2.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
identified

Date/ Details of Initial consultation with


2.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Date of submission of draft EIA report/


2.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
proposal for clearance

2.4 Review of proposal/ EIA report by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

3 Forest Clearance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Requirement for forest clearance


3.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
identified

Date/ Details of initial consultation with


3.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Details/cost of trees being felled basis


3.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
concerned District Forest Office

Date of submission of proposal for forest


3.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
clearance

3.5 Review of proposal by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

4 Wildlife Clearance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Requirement for wildlife clearance


4.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
identified

Date/ Details of initial consultation with


4.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Details/cost of trees being felled basis


4.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
concerned District Forest Office

Date of submission of proposal for


4.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
wildlife clearance

4.5 Review of proposal by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

5 Utility Clearances (Electricity) Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

5.1 Identification of overground utilities Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Identification of underground utilities


5.2 using GPR, Induction Locator or Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
equivalent technologies

Name/ Details of consultation with local


5.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
authority/ people

Utility relocation plan with existing /


5.4 proposed location showing existing RoW Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
and topographic details

5.5 Cost for relocation as per authority Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Date of proposal submission to


5.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Review of utility relocation plan/


5.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
proposal by client

6 Utility Clearances (Water) Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Identification of overground utilities in


6.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
RoW

Identification of underground utilities


6.2 using GPR, Induction Locator or Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
equivalent technologies
Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Name/ Details of consultation with local


6.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
authority/ people

Utility relocation plan with existing /


6.4 proposed location showing existing RoW Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
and topographic details

6.5 Cost for relocation as per authority Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Date of proposal submission to


6.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
competent authority

Review of utility relocation plan/


6.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
proposal by client

7 Utility Clearances (Others) Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Identification of overground utilities in


7.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
RoW

Identification of underground utilities


7.2 using GPR, Induction Locator or Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
equivalent technologies

Name/ Details of consultation with local


7.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
authority/ people

Utility relocation plan with existing /


7.4 proposed location showing existing RoW Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
and topographic details

7.5 Cost for relocation as per authority Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Date of proposal submission to


7.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Review of utility relocation plan/


7.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
proposal by client

8 Railway Clearances Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Identification of ROB/ RUB on project


8.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
corridor

Initial consultation with competent


8.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
authority
Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Date of proposal submission to


8.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

8.4 Review of GAD/ proposal by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9 Other Clearances Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Requirement for other clearances


9.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
identified

Date of proposal submission to


9.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

9.3 Review of proposal by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10 Land Acquisition Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Detailed schedule about acquisition of


10.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
landholdings as per land records

10.2 Consultation with affected persons Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Name/ Details of consultation with


10.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
NGOs

Name/ Details of consultation with


10.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
concerned government agencies

Total land required, land area already


10.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
available , land to be acquired identified

Review of land acquisition using digital


10.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
cadastral map by client

11 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

11.1 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Report fulfils project objectives and


11.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
scope as per RFP

11.3 Report reviewed for errors and omissions Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Compliance report prepared on client


11.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
observations
DPR Checklist – Stage 4 – Detailed Project Report (Structures)

General Details

Project Name

Consultant's Name

Date of Review

Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

1 Project background Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Project description
1.1  Existing LC number Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Start and End Chainage
 Village/District
Project location map

1.2  On State Map Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐


 On District Map
 Latitude & Longitude
Coordinates of the LC
Details of Existing Level Crossing

1.3  Number of Railway Tracks Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐


 Type of Railway Tracks
(Broad/Meter/Narrow)
 No. of trains per day
Justification for need of an ROB/RUB
1.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
(on basis of TVU count)

1.5 Overview of land use plans Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Overview of existing pavement


conditions
1.6
 Number of Lanes Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Type of Pavement
(Flexible/Rigid/Surfaced/Unsurfa
ced)
1.7 Existing right of way details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

1.8 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

2 Social analysis of the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Project impact on stakeholders such as


2.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
local people

Project impact on residential, commercial


2.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
and public properties

2.3 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

3 Reconnaissance survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Geometric Features of the Existing Road

 Design Speed
3.1  Sight distance details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Horizontal Alignment Details
 Vertical Alignment Details
 Height of Embankment
Topographical Survey using LiDAR or
equivalent technology as per IRC:SP:19
3.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Gradient
 Terrain
Pavement composition and condition
3.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
survey as per IRC:SP:19

Geological Survey
3.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Geological Map of the Area
 Seismicity
Climatic Conditions
3.5  Temperature Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Rainfall
 Wind
Land Use along the existing alignment
3.6  Map of the Project Area depicting Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Agricultural/Habitation/Forest
Area
Details of Existing Structures

3.7  Map of the Project Area depicting Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Hutments/Buildings/Temples/Pub
lic Building/Any Other
Significant Structure
Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Inventory and condition survey of


3.8 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
culverts

Geo-technical and sub-soil explorations


3.9 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
as per IRC:78

Number of Bore holes dug (holds for


3.10 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
every pier and abutment)

Field testing, soil sampling, laboratory


3.11 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
testing as per IRC: 78

Recommendation of Foundation Type


3.12 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
and Depth

Hydraulic and Hydrological


3.13 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
investigations as per IRC:5

3.14 High Flood Level specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

3.15 Depth of Water Table specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

3.16 Ponded Water Level specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Materials Survey conducted as per


3.17 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:SP:19

Sources of Naturally Occurring


Aggregates specified
3.18 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Details of Borrow Pits with
Distance from Project Site
 Cost of Material/Transportation
Sources of Manufactured Items specified
3.19  Details of Suppliers with Distance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
from Project Site
 Cost of Material/Transportation
Source of Water for construction
3.20 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
specified as per IS:456

3.21 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

4 Traffic surveys and analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Classified traffic volume counts using


4.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IHMCL data (7 day)
Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

4.2 Traffic projection as per IRC:108 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

4.3 Projected Traffic data for 20 years Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

4.4 Current and Projected PCU Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

4.5 Current and Projected TVU Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

4.6 Axle load survey as per IRC:SP:19 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

4.7 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Determination of whether ROB or


5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
RUB is appropriate

Justification of whether ROB or RUB


5.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
should be built

6 Alignment Options Study Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

At least two alignments proposed


6.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Details of Alignments on Map
Length of the project along proposed
6.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
alignment options

Land Acquisition required along


6.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
alignment options

6.4 Cost Estimates of alternatives Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Recommended Alignment with


6.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
Justification

Skew Angle of Proposed Alignment


6.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
Specified

6.7 Traffic Diversion Route Specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

6.8 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

7 Design Specifications Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

7.1 Number of Lanes Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐


Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Width of ROB

7.2  Width of Carriageway Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐


 Width of Safety Kerbs
 Width of Footpath
 Any other
Proposed Number of Lanes on ROB in
7.3 line with PCU as per latest MoRTH Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
guidelines

Proposed Length of the Project

 Length of ROB
7.4  Length of Viaduct Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Length of RE Wall
 Length of Approach Road
 Length of Service Road
Span Arrangement
7.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Span Length
 Number of Spans
Are all spans of standardised length as
per Railways standards
7.6 (https://ircep.gov.in/RCApproval/) Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

 If non-standardised, suitable
justification provided
Details of Proposed Superstructure
Design
7.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Type
 Details of Material Use Proposed
 Drawings of Cross-Sections
Details of Proposed Substructure Design

7.8 Type Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

 Details of Material Use Proposed


 Drawings of Cross-Sections
Details of Proposed Pavement Design

Type
7.9 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
 Details of Material Use Proposed
 Thickness
 Design MSA
 Drawings of Cross-Sections
Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

7.10 Details of Drainage Structures Proposed Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

7.11 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8 Cost estimates Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Summary of Cost Estimates (Refer


8.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
following subsection)

8.2 Detailed Abstract of Cost Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8.3 Detailed Bills of Quantity Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

8.4 Detailed Rate Analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9 Financial Viability Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9.1 Estimated cost details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9.2 Projected revenues details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

9.3 Assumptions stated Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Analysis and results


9.4  IRR Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Sensitivity Analysis
 Financial Viability
10 Land Acquisition Study Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Land Acquisition Details


10.1  Total Land Required Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
 Land Area already available
 Area of Land to be Acquired
10.2 Land Acquisition Plan on Cadastral Map Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.3 Details of LA Cost Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

11 Utility Shifting Study Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

11.1 Results of GPR investigation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Utility relocation plan with existing /


11.2 proposed location showing existing RoW Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
and topographic details
Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

11.3 Cost for relocation as per authority Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

12 General Arrangement Drawing Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

12.1 Elevation of Railway Portion Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

12.2 Plan of Railway Portion Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

12.3 General Elevation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

General Plan (showing complete


12.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
ROB/RUB along with diversion)

12.5 Key Plan Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

12.6 Cross-Section of Railway Portion Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Cost Summary Table

S.No. Particulars Cost Estimate(in '000)

1 Cost of ROB Portion

Foundation

Substructure

Superstructure

Total-ROB Portion

2 Cost of Viaduct

Foundation

Substructure

Superstructure

Total-Viaduct

3 Cost of Approach Road


S.No. Particulars Cost Estimate(in '000)

4 Cost of RE Wall

5 Cost of Service Road

6 Miscellaneous Costs

Cost of Subway

Cost of Toll Plaza

Cost of Culverts

Any Other Costs

Civil Cost of the Project

7 Contingencies @x%

Total Civil Cost

8 Supervision Charges @x%

9 Cost of Quality Control @x%

10 Maintenance Charges @x%

11 Escalation Costs @x%

12 Land Acquisition Costs

13 Utility Shifting Costs

14 Any Other Costs

Total Cost of the Project


DPR Checklist – Stage 5 – Tchnical Schedules (Structures)

General Details

Project Name

Consultant's Name

Date of Review

Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

1 Schedule A - Site of the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Schedule B - Development of the


2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
project highway

3 Schedule C - Project facilities Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Schedule D - Specifications and


4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
standards

5 Any other relevant details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


DPR Checklist – Stage 6 – LA and Clearances II Report (Structures)

General Details

Project Name

Consultant's Name

Date of Review

Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

1 Executive Summary Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

2 Environment Clearance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

2.1 Details of public hearings completed Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Date of final environment clearance by


2.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

3 Forest Clearance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Date/ Details of Joint site inspection with


3.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
DFO/ competent authority

Date of Stage I forest clearance approval


3.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
by competent authority

Date of final forest clearance approval by


3.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

4 Wildlife Clearance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Date/ Details of joint site inspection with


4.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
DFO/ competent authority

Date of final wildlife clearance approval


4.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
by competent authority

5 Utility Clearances (Electricity) Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Date/ Details of Joint site inspection with


5.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority
Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

Date of estimate submission by


5.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Date of estimate approval by competent


5.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
authority

6 Utility Clearances (Water) Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Date/ Details of Joint site inspection with


6.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Date of estimate submission by


6.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Date of estimate approval by competent


6.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
authority

7 Utility Clearances (Others) Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Date/ Details of Joint site inspection with


7.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Date of estimate submission by


7.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Date of estimate approval by competent


7.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
authority

8 Railway Clearances Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Date/ Details of joint site inspection with


8.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

Date of final approval of GAD by


8.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

9 Other Clearances Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Date of final approval by competent


9.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
authority

10 Land Acquisition Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.1 Draft 3a notification submitted Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.2 Review of 3a notification by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA


Details/
S.No SECTION OF THE REPORT YES/NO/NA Remarks
Specifications

10.3 Date of 3a gazette notification Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

10.4 Draft 3a notification submitted Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.5 Review of 3A notification by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.6 Date of 3A gazette notification Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

Date of Joint Measurement Survey with


10.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
competent authority

10.8 Draft 3D notification submitted Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.9 Review of 3D notification by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

10.10 Date of 3D gazette notification Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐

11 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

11.1 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Report fulfils project objectives and


11.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
scope as per RFP

11.3 Report reviewed for errors and omissions Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA

Compliance report prepared on client


11.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
observations