Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS

PSALM gravely abused its discretion the disposal of the Angat HEPP by sale
through public bidding – the principal mode of
disposition under EPIRA – remains PSALM’s
primary option.
PSALM cannot sell the AHEPP without the they do not involve the sale of Angat Dam
consent of co-owners MWSS and NIA itself
PSALM clearly violated the constitutional PSALM stressed its compliance with the
provisions relevant laws and the Constitution
Philippine Government, along with its LGUs did not raise any concerns during the
agencies and subdivisions, have an forum held by PSALM
obligation under international law
bidding process initiated by PSALM be DOJ Opinion: AHEPP, as a generation asset,
declared null and void may be sold to a foreign entity
their legal standing to file the present suit in petitioners have no standing to file the
their capacity as taxpayers, or as Filipino petition and that a petition for certiorari is not
citizens the proper remedy
case is capable of repetition yet evading controversy has been rendered moot and
review academic
paramount public interest is involved
Court’s interpretation of public bidding applies Court has no jurisdiction.
to any law which requires public bidding
MWSS asserts that by it has supervision and Neither MWSS nor NIA was a co-owner of
control over the Angat Dam the said structures.
MWSS argues that its powers over
waterworks are vested upon it by a special MWSS never exercised jurisdiction and
law control over the said facility
Manila Prince v GSIS K-Water claim that its participation in the
AHEPP is in dire danger of being wholly- bidding by an abiding respect for the
owned by a Korean corporation which Constitution and the laws of the Philippines,
probably merely considers it as just another and hopes for a prompt resolution of the
business opportunity present petition to further strengthen and
enhance the investment environment
transfer of water rights to K-Water, petitioners only the AHEPP and not the Angat Dam
reiterate that this violates the Water Code which was being privatized

Вам также может понравиться